作者: admin

  • Anne opens history centre at war cemetery

    Anne opens history centre at war cemetery

    In a landmark ceremony highlighting post-war reconciliation between the United Kingdom and Germany, Princess Anne has officially opened a new purpose-built history centre at the Cannock Chase German Military Cemetery in Staffordshire. The Thursday event drew senior representatives from both nations, gathering at the sombre, historic site that holds the remains of nearly 5,000 German and Austrian service members killed across the two World Wars. An adjacent cemetery also holds the remains of 350 additional personnel, making the location one of the UK’s most prominent sites of shared cross-national commemoration.

    Managed and developed in partnership by the German War Graves Commission (Volksbund Deutsche Kriegsgräberfürsorge) and the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, the new facility is designed to turn the cemetery from a site of remembrance into a hub for public education. It features a fully bilingual exhibition and dedicated workshop spaces, which trace the complex shared history of Britain and Germany, and trace the decades-long process of reconciliation that has shaped their modern alliance.

    Vice Admiral Peter Hudson, Vice Chairman of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, spoke at the ceremony, expressing deep honour for his organisation’s role in delivering the project and gratitude for Princess Anne’s participation in the inauguration. He described the Cannock Chase site as a uniquely meaningful space for collective reflection, noting that it honours individual lives lost in the devastating global conflicts of the 20th century. “This new centre is more than a building, it’s a place of learning, of reflection and understanding. It reminds us of the immense human cost of war,” Hudson said. “The stories told within this centre help us understand that cost.”

    Hudson emphasized that the centre’s core mission extends beyond remembrance, to educating coming generations about the value of global cooperation and lasting peace. “Perhaps most importantly, the centre will help future generations engage with that history by understanding the past honestly and thoughtfully,” he explained. “People can better appreciate the value of peace, democracy and international cooperation. The friendship that exists today between the United Kingdom and Germany is one of the great achievements of post-war reconciliation. Places like this demonstrate how remembrance can bring people together.”

    The project marks a key milestone in cross-border collaborative remembrance work, creating a permanent public space that bridges historical division to foster mutual understanding and respect between former adversaries.

  • Wife of US scholar jailed in China asks Trump to raise arrest at Xi meeting

    Wife of US scholar jailed in China asks Trump to raise arrest at Xi meeting

    As Chinese President Xi Jinping prepares for a high-stakes state visit to Washington DC next week, where he will meet with U.S. President Donald Trump, families of American citizens wrongfully detained in China have descended on the U.S. capital to push for urgent action to secure their loved ones’ release. At the center of these appeals is Sylvia Zin, the wife of imprisoned U.S.-affiliated scholar U Min Zin, who publicly called on Trump to raise her husband’s case directly during the upcoming bilateral summit.

    U Min Zin, a respected scholar who leads the Myanmar Institute for Strategic and Policy Studies (ISP-Myanmar), a think tank focused on Myanmar’s regional relations and China’s growing influence in the country, was taken into custody in the Chinese city of Kunming back on June 3, shortly after he arrived to attend an academic conference. A former pro-democracy student activist during Myanmar’s 1988 uprising, U Min Zin’s research has long examined Chinese strategic interests and regional power dynamics in Southeast Asia.

    Appearing Wednesday before the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on East Asia and the Pacific during a hearing focused on wrongful detentions by China and North Korea, Sylvia Zin laid out her desperate plea to the administration. “I’m deeply hopeful that President Trump will raise my husband’s case with President Xi Jinping at the summit next week,” she told lawmakers. She added that she is confident Trump can also secure the release of Chen Youlin, a U.S. seismologist who has been held in a Chinese prison for two years while monitoring nuclear testing activity in the region.

    Sylvia Zin, who resides in Thailand, told the committee she has been barred from direct contact with her husband since his arrest. “Every month, we anxiously await his consular visits because they reassure us that he is alive,” she said, sharing that U.S. officials have informed her that U Min Zin faced up to six hours of interrogations daily in the initial period of his detention. “I’m trying to be strong for our daughter, but I’m constantly wondering if he’s OK and how to get him back home to us.”

    The hearing was chaired by Representative Young Kim, who opened the session with a stark warning for U.S. citizens considering travel to China. “If you travel to China, Beijing may take you hostage as leverage in diplomatic negotiation,” Kim said, adding that U Min Zin’s detention was a deliberate show of force ahead of the summit. “Beijing wanted to send a message to those whose research inconvenienced it, and detained Mr Zin ahead of the upcoming Trump-Xi summit.”

    Another high-profile detainee’s family also joined the advocacy push on Capitol Hill this week. The son of Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai appeared before lawmakers to request Trump raise his father’s case once again during talks with Xi. Trump previously brought up Lai’s detention during past talks with the Chinese president, and told reporters afterward that Xi had described the case as “a tough one.”

    Last month, the U.S. State Department officially formally designated both U Min Zin and Chen Youlin as “wrongfully detained” while in Chinese custody. This classification triggers a formal process that transfers oversight of the cases to the Office of the Special Envoy for Hostage Affairs, a move that elevates the priority of the detentions and allows the U.S. government to dedicate additional specialized resources to securing their release.

    Citing Trump’s track record of securing the return of wrongfully held Americans, Sylvia Zin expressed cautious confidence in the president’s ability to deliver results. “Knowing the president’s historic record on bringing wrongfully detained Americans home has reassured me that he will also be able to secure the swift release of Min Zin and other wrongfully detained citizens,” she said. Past precedent supports this hope: during Trump and Xi’s last formal meeting, the president pressed for the release of underground Chinese church leader Jin Mingri, who was freed just two months after Trump formally raised the request.

    When reached for comment by the BBC this week, a senior anonymous White House official confirmed that resolving wrongful detentions of U.S. citizens remains a core priority for the administration. “Resolving the wrongful detentions of US citizens is always a top priority for the President,” the official said.

    Xi’s upcoming state visit marks the return meeting after Trump traveled to Beijing for a bilateral summit last May, making the discussion of detained American citizens a central point of friction on the agenda ahead of the talks.

  • Warm words on Canada’s EU ‘associate membership’ but no guarantees

    Warm words on Canada’s EU ‘associate membership’ but no guarantees

    Recent headlines across Europe have stirred widespread confusion over a surprising prospect: could Canada, a North American nation thousands of kilometers from the continent, formalize a closer relationship with the European Union as its first ever associate member? Under existing EU constitutional rules, full membership is explicitly off the table, as the bloc restricts membership to geographically European states. But a new framework of associate membership has opened the door to a historic shift in transatlantic relations.

    The discussion moved from speculation to formal proposal last week, when European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen extended an official invitation to Canada to take up this unprecedented associate status. Addressing the European Parliament on Thursday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney responded with enthusiastic support, arguing that deepened cross-Atlantic cooperation across a wide range of strategic sectors is critical to bolstering shared autonomy for both sides.

    Brussels and Ottawa already benefit from the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), a far-reaching free trade deal that has boosted bilateral commerce for years. Carney stressed that associate membership would go beyond existing trade ties, building new collaboration on energy security, economic resilience, critical raw material supply chains, higher education cooperation, artificial intelligence and tech innovation, and joint defense capabilities. These aligned efforts, he argued, would safeguard the sovereignty and economic interests of all participating nations.

    The push for closer alignment comes as both Canada and the EU face growing pressure from competing global forces. Both blocs have increasingly found themselves squeezed between the two world superpowers, the United States and China, while also grappling with the outsized influence of supranational tech giants that operate beyond the reach of individual national regulators. Carney was careful to frame the proposal not as an effort to build a competing third superpower or create a new bloc targeted at any other nation.

    “We do not pursue zero sum deals,” Carney told the assembled parliamentarians. Instead, he argued that like-minded democratic nations must band together to build a renewed, modern multilateral governance framework at a time when global order is shifting toward a ‘might makes right’ approach embraced by many major powers. Only through collective action and rejecting isolationism, he added, can nations close critical capability gaps, build collective strength, and protect their individual national sovereignty.

    Carney’s implicit rebuke of rising nationalist populism came as no coincidence: upcoming national elections across multiple EU member states have seen far-right, nationalist parties gain traction, with slogans ranging from ‘Italy First’ to ‘France for the French’ and ‘Make Poland Great Again’ that echo the nationalist rhetoric of former U.S. President Donald Trump. Carney’s address received a rapturous, heartfelt applause from the majority of European Parliament members in attendance.

    Reaction across the Atlantic has been far less welcoming. Earlier this week, Trump, who currently holds the U.S. presidency, dismissed the proposal out of hand, threatening to impose sweeping, ‘very heavy tariffs’ on both Canada and the EU if the associate membership agreement moves forward, and warned he would consider the move a ‘hostile act’ against U.S. interests.

    Ironically, it is Trump’s own unilateral, unpredictable trade and foreign policy that has pushed Brussels and Ottawa closer together. For decades, the United States has been both the top trade partner and the primary security ally for both Canada and the EU. But in recent years, the White House has repeatedly weaponized trade tariffs against both parties, with Canada currently locked in an escalating trade dispute that Ottawa has described as a full-blown trade ‘war’ with the Biden-Trumper administration. Beyond trade, both Canada and the EU have growing concerns that they can no longer rely on the United States for consistent security and defense backing, given Washington’s shifting foreign policy priorities.

    Canada is not the only non-European ally moving toward closer ties with the bloc amid growing doubts over U.S. reliability. Japan and South Korea, two key U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific, have also expressed interest in gaining closer alignment and what some describe as ‘policy shelter’ under the EU’s institutional umbrella. For its part, the EU has moved aggressively to diversify its global trade and strategic partnerships in recent years, concluding new deals with India, Indonesia, Japan, and other major economies to reduce overreliance on any single global power.

    Despite the momentum behind the proposal, there is no guarantee that Canada’s associate membership will ever come to fruition, let alone serve as a blueprint for other nations like the United Kingdom that have sought closer ties with the bloc short of full membership. Any revised partnership framework would require unanimous approval from all 27 current EU member states, a high bar that has sunk many ambitious proposals in the past. There is also no existing legal precedent for associate membership, meaning negotiations would likely stretch on for years, with multiple potential conflicts of interest already looming, including long-running disputes over global steel tariffs.

    A previous proposal from Germany earlier this year to grant associate membership to Ukraine, which is actively seeking full EU accession, was rejected by multiple member states, highlighting the political hurdles facing any new framework. Some member states, including the current French government, oppose granting non-members overly favorable access to the EU single market and institutions, arguing that this could embolden euroskeptic political forces at home and abroad by giving countries outside the bloc many of the benefits of membership without the corresponding obligations, encouraging voters to support leaving the bloc.

    At its core, however, the debate over associate membership reflects a broader shift for the EU. For decades, the bloc has maintained rigid rules around membership and institutional access. But buffeted by growing geopolitical pressures from the United States, China, and Russia, the EU is facing increasing pressure to demonstrate greater flexibility to accommodate aligned nations that want to deepen cooperation and stand with the bloc amid an increasingly fractured global order.

  • Watch: ‘A better opportunity’ – Canadians on a closer alliance with Europe

    Watch: ‘A better opportunity’ – Canadians on a closer alliance with Europe

    As speculation grows around the future of Canada’s international partnerships, conversations have emerged around the prospect of forging a far closer strategic, economic and political alliance between Canada and the European Union. To gauge public opinion on this potential geopolitical shift, reporters recently headed to Canada’s largest city, Toronto, to speak directly with residents about what a deeper alignment with the 27-nation bloc could mean for their country.

    Canadians from a range of age groups and professional backgrounds shared diverse perspectives on the idea, with many framing the proposed alliance as a promising step forward for the North American nation. Multiple interviewees emphasized that closer ties with the European Union would open new doors for Canadian trade, expand cultural exchange opportunities and strengthen collective diplomatic clout on the global stage. For many residents, this potential alignment represents more than just a policy shift; they see it as “a better opportunity” to deepen collaboration on shared challenges ranging from climate action to democratic governance.

    While discussions around Canada’s relationship with the EU are not new, the renewed focus on a formal, closer alliance comes amid shifting global geopolitical dynamics that have pushed many nations to re-evaluate their key international partnerships. Public input from major urban centers like Toronto will likely play a role in shaping how Canadian policymakers approach future negotiations and cooperation frameworks with Brussels.

  • Netanyahu calls to strip citizenship of those who ‘defame’ Israeli army

    Netanyahu calls to strip citizenship of those who ‘defame’ Israeli army

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ignited fierce political debate after announcing plans to push sweeping new legislation targeting individuals who speak critically of the Israeli military, a proposal triggered by the release of a bombshell independent documentary that includes firsthand testimony from current and former soldiers detailing alleged war crimes committed during the ongoing military campaign in Gaza.

    The film, titled *NAZA*, has drawn swift and fierce pushback from senior Israeli government figures ever since it was awarded the Special Jury Prize at the 83rd Venice International Film Festival over the weekend. The documentary features anonymous on-camera interviews with 24 current and former Israeli military and intelligence insiders, who provide detailed accounts of military operations that resulted in mass civilian casualties. Among the most explosive claims included in the film is that Israeli commanders approved a strike that was expected to kill up to 500 Palestinian civilians solely to eliminate one high-ranking Hamas operative. Interviewees also confirmed that Israeli forces routinely use artificial intelligence tools to identify strike targets and carry out remote bombings, even when operational data clearly projected widespread civilian deaths. Already, the Israeli military has issued an official statement rejecting all allegations raised in the documentary as unsubstantiated.

    In a video address shared widely across social media platforms, Netanyahu laid out the terms of the two bills his government will introduce to the Knesset, Israel’s national parliament. The first bill would grant the state authority to revoke the Israeli citizenship of any individual found to have defamed active-duty or retired Israeli soldiers. The second proposal would drastically increase financial penalties for defamation against military personnel, raising the maximum possible damage awards by 20 times current levels.

    “We will hit them both in the pocket and in citizenship, because they have no place among us,” Netanyahu said in the address, echoing the hardline stance already adopted by other top members of his governing coalition. Netanyahu’s announcement follows explicit calls from multiple cabinet ministers to revoke the citizenship of *NAZA* co-directors Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor over their work on the film.

    On Monday, Israeli Culture Minister Miki Zohar doubled down on that pressure, describing the documentary as “despicable” and calling its Venice Film Festival award “shocking.” Writing on the social platform X, Zohar accused the filmmakers of “burning self-hatred” and betrayal of the Israeli state, arguing that the pair had deliberately harmed their country to win praise from what he called antisemitic audiences abroad. “The creators’ burning self-hatred, and their willingness to harm their homeland in order to receive applause from antisemites around the world, is beyond comprehension and constitutes a betrayal of the state,” Zohar wrote. “I will act immediately to revoke the Israeli citizenship of these despicable creators on the grounds of treason against the state.”

    The proposed legislation has already sparked concerns among civil liberties advocates over its potential to curtail freedom of speech and political dissent inside Israel, though the Netanyahu administration has framed the measures as a necessary defense of the country’s military and national security.

  • Palestinian prisoner gives birth in Israeli jail raising fears for pregnant detainees

    Palestinian prisoner gives birth in Israeli jail raising fears for pregnant detainees

    A highly publicized case of a Palestinian prisoner giving birth inside an Israeli detention facility has reignited long-simmering international and regional scrutiny over the systemic mistreatment of pregnant Palestinian detainees in Israeli custody, shining a harsh light on gaps in medical access, nutrition, and basic human rights protections behind bars.

    Thirty-five-year-old Dana Joudeh, who was held under Israel’s controversial administrative detention policy – a practice that allows indefinite detention without formal charge or trial – welcomed her baby daughter on September 14. Joudeh had been taken into custody from her home in Iraq al-Tayeh, a village near the West Bank city of Nablus, on March 1, when she was already three months pregnant. Just one day after the birth, both Joudeh and her newborn were released and transferred to a medical facility in Ramallah for urgent care. As of initial reports, Joudeh’s full health status remains undisclosed, with her family declining to address media inquiries.

    The Palestinian Commission of Detainees and Ex-Detainees Affairs has placed full responsibility for any harm to Joudeh and her infant on Israeli authorities. The organization confirmed that Joudeh was denied consistent, adequate medical care throughout her entire pregnancy, and condemned the forced delivery in a prison setting as a fundamental violation of human rights. In an official statement released Monday, the commission argued that detaining a pregnant woman and denying her routine prenatal care amounts to a deliberate crime that contravenes established international law and humanitarian conventions, adding that forcing childbirth within a prison system constitutes a second, separate violation.

    Joudeh’s experience has amplified urgent fears for two other pregnant Palestinian detainees still held in Israeli custody: 28-year-old Manar Karaja from Ramallah, who is six months pregnant, and Baraa Abu Khadija from Tulkarm, who is four months along.

    Banan Abu al-Haija, a former Palestinian detainee who spent 14 months in administrative detention alongside the three pregnant women, shared firsthand accounts of the dangerous conditions they endured. Abu al-Haija, who shared a cell designated for pregnant detainees with Joudeh, Karaja, and another detainee who has since been released, told reporters that Joudeh faced persistent health complications throughout her detention. Before her arrest, Joudeh had undergone gastric bypass surgery that required consistent access to specialized vitamins and nutritional supplements – all of which prison officials refused to provide, according to Abu al-Haija.

    “The cell where Dana, Manar, and the other detained woman were held was cramped, overheated, and unsuitable for expecting mothers,” Abu al-Haija explained in her interview with Middle East Eye. “They had no access to enough nutritious food to support their own health and the development of their fetuses. They were denied any regular medical treatment, not even basic over-the-counter pain medication.” She added that trips to the on-site prison clinic were extremely infrequent, with gaps of more than a month between scheduled appointments, and inadequate, unsanitary hygiene facilities compounded their daily suffering.

    Abu al-Haija also recalled a violent incident involving another former cellmate: after Israeli forces fired stun grenades directly at the cell door, the detainee experienced repeated bleeding, yet prison officials dismissed her pleas for care out of hand. “All of these women live under constant, severe psychological stress,” Abu al-Haija said. “They worry nonstop about their families on the outside, their own uncertain legal status, and their children. Every day is spent just waiting and longing for release.”

    For the families of the two remaining pregnant detainees, the fear that their loved ones will face the same traumatic experience of giving birth in prison has grown exponentially in the wake of Joudeh’s case. Musab Zalloum, Karaja’s husband, told reporters that his family’s anxiety has spiked since news of Joudeh’s delivery broke. They now fear Karaja will remain in detention through her delivery and possibly beyond.

    Karaja’s last meeting with her legal counsel took place on August 29, and during that meeting, she outlined alarming conditions in her cell. She reported developing scabies, a contagious parasitic skin infection, caused by poor hygiene and a lack of basic sanitary supplies. She also confirmed consistent shortages of nutritious food and inadequate prenatal care. A mother of two young children – five-year-old Ayman and four-year-old Laila – Karaja told her lawyer that the only medical checks provided at the prison clinic are basic screenings for blood pressure and diabetes. Because of insufficient food rations, her weight has dropped throughout her pregnancy rather than increasing as medically recommended.

    “After we found out Dana gave birth in prison, our fears went from bad to overwhelming,” Zalloum told Middle East Eye. “We are terrified that Manar will have to go through that same traumatic experience, and we worry constantly about both her health and our unborn baby’s.” Zalloum, who was able to be by his wife’s side for both of her previous pregnancies and deliveries, is currently barred from any in-person visits and can only receive sporadic updates on her condition through her legal team. “Our two children miss her more than words can say. They just started kindergarten a few days ago, and she wasn’t there to be with them,” Zalloum said. “Everything is harder without her. We are all just waiting desperately for her to come home.” Karaja remains in detention as of this report, with her next court hearing scheduled for October 4.

    Joudeh’s case is far from an isolated incident: Palestinian prisoner advocacy groups have documented widespread, systemic abuse of female Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons for decades, including repeated cases of forced childbirth behind bars and forced separation of newborns from incarcerated mothers.

    In a statement released just five days before Joudeh gave birth, the Palestinian Prisoners’ Society (PPS) warned that conditions for all female Palestinian detainees have deteriorated to an all-time high level of severity. The group reported that Israeli prison authorities have carried out dozens of violent raids on women’s cell blocks since the start of 2024, including physical assaults, public humiliation, extended solitary confinement, and collective punishment of all detainees for individual actions. During raids, PPS reported, women are routinely handcuffed with their arms bound behind their backs, blindfolded, and forced into prison courtyards for extended periods, while their personal belongings – including essential hygiene and medical items – are confiscated and destroyed. The PPS added that Israeli forces have increasingly used tear gas inside cell blocks and have placed more women in prolonged solitary confinement, a practice that causes severe long-term psychological harm.

    “The damage from these abusive practices is not limited to the immediate physical pain they cause,” the PPS statement read. “It turns daily life for these women into a constant cycle of fear, anxiety, and humiliation that never ends.” The organization highlighted the case of Shaimaa Khazem from Jenin, another Palestinian woman held under administrative detention whose health has deteriorated in recent months.

    As of the beginning of September, prisoner advocacy groups estimate that 90 Palestinian women are currently held in Israeli detention facilities, part of a total population of more than 9,350 Palestinian prisoners overall.

  • What could EU associate member status mean for Canada?

    What could EU associate member status mean for Canada?

    A new chapter in transatlantic relations has opened after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen put forward a groundbreaking proposal: designating Canada as the European Union’s first ever associate member, a status not currently defined in any existing EU treaty. The proposal, outlined during her annual State of the Union address this week, has sparked widespread debate over what this unprecedented partnership would look like, how it would reshape global geopolitics, and whether it can even overcome the significant procedural and political hurdles standing in its way.

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has quickly embraced the ambition, framing the potential partnership as a unique alignment tailored to shared values and pressing modern challenges, rather than a step toward full EU membership. Speaking to reporters and addressing the European Parliament on Thursday, Carney made clear that Canada has no intention of seeking full integration into the bloc, nor does it aim to form a competing third power bloc that would disrupt existing global alliances. “We do not seek power to dominate others,” Carney emphasized, positioning the closer partnership as a response to what he called the “current geopolitical rupture” reshaping global trade and security.

    That rupture is widely understood as a reference to strained trade relations between Canada and its largest trading partner, the United States, fueled by President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff policies and the collapse of bilateral trade negotiations in recent months. Carney laid out a clear roadmap of priority areas where he says Canada and the EU can deepen cooperation to mutual benefit, spanning cutting-edge artificial intelligence governance, secure supply chains for critical minerals, expanded defence industrial collaboration, strengthened energy security, and joint advancement in the space sector. He also confirmed Canada is eager to join the EU’s Erasmus Plus programme, the popular mobility initiative that enables cross-border student study and work exchanges. The UK is already set to rejoin the scheme in 2027, and Canada would become the eighth non-EU participant if its bid succeeds.

    On energy, Carney highlighted a mutually beneficial arrangement: Canada can deliver large-scale volumes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and low-carbon hydrogen to help Europe shore up its energy security after years of market disruption, while Canada would gain access to European expertise and leadership in clean energy technology innovation.

    For all the outlined shared priorities, however, critical details about what associate membership would actually entail remain entirely unclear. Unlike existing partnership models, EU associate membership does not exist under current EU law, and creating the new legal framework would require years of negotiations, unanimous approval from all 27 EU member states, and formal ratification in every national legislature — a process that often stalls on competing national priorities.

    Skepticism is already brewing within the bloc. Some member states argue that expanding existing trade and defence agreements between Brussels and Ottawa would be a more efficient path forward, rather than building an entirely new category of membership from scratch. The EU is already Canada’s second-largest trading partner, and the two sides have operated under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) for more than a decade. Even so, CETA has yet to be ratified by several EU member states, and the existing deal does not eliminate all cross-border checks between Canada and the bloc, leaving analysts to question whether associate membership would address that gap.

    Another open question is what associate membership would mean for Canada’s access to the EU single market. If Canada were to gain full access to the single market, it would be required to adopt all EU regulatory standards without holding any voting seats or decision-making power in Brussels — a dynamic similar to the arrangement that Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Switzerland currently hold. That shift would require a major overhaul of Canada’s existing regulatory framework, which has long been aligned with the United States, its largest economic partner.

    Geopolitical friction could also emerge from the proposal. Multiple countries across the Western Balkans and Eastern Europe — including Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Georgia, and Moldova — have been working for years toward full EU accession. While EU leaders have stated that a new associate partnership with Canada would not slow these countries’ progress, any perception that Ottawa is receiving special, accelerated treatment could create internal tension within the bloc’s expansion process.

    Finally, the proposal has already drawn a hostile response from U.S. President Donald Trump, who has dismissed the prospect of Canada’s associate membership as “laughable” and threatened to impose additional tariffs on the European Union if the plan moves forward. For all the enthusiasm from Carney and von der Leyen, the road to creating the EU’s first associate member is littered with political, procedural, and geopolitical obstacles that will take years to untangle.

  • UN experts say grounds to believe US committed war crimes in Iran strikes

    UN experts say grounds to believe US committed war crimes in Iran strikes

    In a landmark new report submitted to the UN Human Rights Council, three independent human rights experts with the UN-mandated Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran have concluded there is credible evidence to hold both the United States and Iranian authorities responsible for severe, systematic violations of international law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity.

    The core finding of the investigation centers on two deadly February 28, 2026 missile strikes carried out amid open conflict between the US, Israel and Iran that killed a total of at least 177 civilians, more than half of them children. The first strike targeted Shajareh Tayyebeh Primary School in the southern Iranian town of Minab, where local officials confirm 156 people lost their lives, including 120 schoolchildren. While the school sits adjacent to an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval facility that was also attacked that day, the mission’s experts confirmed the educational site was clearly identifiable as a civilian space, with no evidence to suggest it was repurposed for military use.

    Drawing on multiple lines of evidence – including open-source media reports indicating an internal preliminary US military inquiry already found American forces responsible for the strike, and the fact that only the US deploys Tomahawk missiles, the weapon system used in the attack – the experts determined there are reasonable grounds to believe the school was an intentional target, not an accidental miss or unintended collateral damage from the strike on the IRGC complex. Survivor accounts further supported this conclusion, with multiple witnesses confirming the school was hit by two separate missile strikes. The US has not issued an immediate formal response to the report’s findings, and has not yet published the full results of its own internal investigation into the Minab incident. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has previously stated that American forces “never target civilian targets.”

    The second strike examined by the mission hit a civilian sports complex and surrounding residential neighborhood in Lamerd, also on February 28. Local records confirm 21 civilians, including seven children, were killed when Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) dispersed a cloud of lethal tungsten pellets over the area. As with the Minab school, the experts confirmed the sports complex was a clearly marked civilian site with no indication of military use. Again, the mission found reasonable grounds to attribute the strike to the US, noting that only the US possesses PrSM technology. The US military has previously denied carrying out any strikes in Lamerd on that date and disputed claims that PrSM missiles were used.

    Across both incidents, the panel concluded there are reasonable grounds to confirm the US committed the war crime of launching indiscriminate attacks that resulted in mass civilian death, injury and widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure.

    Beyond the US-led strikes, the report also details the Iranian government’s violent crackdown on nationwide anti-government protests that swept the country between December 2025 and January 2026. The experts found that the repression marked a staggering, unprecedented escalation of force compared to past protest crackdowns, with lethal violence deployed across all 31 of Iran’s provinces.

    Witness accounts, testimony from healthcare workers, and statements from victims’ families collected by the mission confirm that Iranian security forces positioned themselves on rooftops and other high vantage points before opening fire with assault rifles on assembled crowds. Many protesters suffered life-altering injuries, including permanent blindness, after being struck by metal shotgun pellets to the head, face and chest. As the crackdown intensified, security forces raided hospitals and other healthcare facilities, beating and arresting wounded demonstrators and detaining medical staff who provided treatment. The experts say this campaign of intimidation prevented hundreds of injured protesters from accessing life-saving medical care.

    Tens of thousands of protesters detained during the unrest have been subjected to widespread torture, prolonged solitary confinement, and systematic denial of access to legal counsel, the report confirms. The panel also found that Iranian authorities have drastically ramped up the use of the death penalty against detained protesters in the months following the unrest: at least 29 men have already been executed after rushed, expedited trials on charges linked to the protests.

    While the mission notes it could not independently verify the full death toll from the crackdown due to restrictions on access, it concluded the actual number of people killed is far higher than the Iranian government’s official count of 3,000 dead – a figure the government frames as mostly security force members and bystanders. The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (Hrana) has independently confirmed more than 7,000 deaths, almost all of them unarmed protesters, a number the mission says is consistent with the evidence it gathered.

    Based on the systematic, widespread nature of the violence against civilian protesters, the experts concluded Iranian authorities committed crimes against humanity, including murder, arbitrary imprisonment, severe unlawful deprivation of liberty, torture, and other inhumane acts carried out as part of a coordinated attack on the country’s civilian population. Iranian officials have not yet issued a formal response to this specific finding, but have previously rejected all claims of systematic human rights violations, and have blamed the unrest on US and Israeli interference, framing protesters as “terrorists” and “rioters.”

    In a closing statement released alongside the report on Thursday, the fact-finding mission warned that Iranian civilians are trapped between two competing forces carrying out gross violations of human rights: “Civilians in Iran are caught between gross human rights violations and crimes against humanity committed by their own government and the nation’s deadly conflict with the United States and Israel.”

  • Hyrox athlete apologises for continuing race after soiling herself

    Hyrox athlete apologises for continuing race after soiling herself

    A high-profile incident at a recent Hyrox fitness competition in Beijing has triggered widespread discussion, public criticism, and official changes to event protocols after the race’s winning athlete issued a public apology and announced she would retroactively withdraw from the event.

    Joanna Wietrzyk, the athlete at the center of the controversy, faced intense online backlash after video footage circulated showing her continuing to compete through the race following an unexpected bodily accident that left her soiled. On Thursday, she took to social media to release a formal statement addressing the incident, offering a full apology to all parties impacted by her decision to stay on the course.

    “I want to offer my sincere apology to the people of China, my fellow competitors, the spectators and the HYROX organizers for what happened during the race in Beijing,” Wietrzyk wrote in her post. She clarified that she had entered the event in full health, with no advance warning of the sudden illness that caused the accident. Reflecting on her on-course choice, she expressed clear regret for not stepping off the track immediately.

    “Looking back, I regret the decision to not have stepped off the track. I recognize that I should have made a different choice. I take responsibility for my decision to continue and am deeply sorry for the discomfort and disruption it caused,” she added. “I know my actions had an impact beyond myself, and I am genuinely sorry to everyone who was affected.”

    Alongside her apology, Wietrzyk confirmed she would forfeit the first-place title she won at the Beijing event, formalizing her retroactive withdrawal from the race.

    The incident also prompted a response from Hyrox leadership, with co-founder Moritz Fürste issuing his own apology for the organization’s handling of the situation. The global fitness brand noted that it maintains formal biocontaminant and medical protocols for competition scenarios, but the unexpected nature of the incident created confusion around how existing rules should be applied.

    In an Instagram statement, Fürste pledged that the organization would revise and strengthen its event processes to prevent similar incidents from occurring at future competitions. Hyrox also moved quickly to condemn online harassment targeting Wietrzyk after her identity was publicly shared, announcing that any user sending threats or abusive messages to the athlete would be permanently banned from all future Hyrox events worldwide. “There is no place in our community for threats of violence or encouragement to harm an athlete,” the organization emphasized in a Monday statement.

    Founded in Hamburg, Germany, in 2017, Hyrox has grown from a niche fitness concept to a global phenomenon, with races hosted across dozens of countries. The sport, which combines 1km running intervals with eight standardized functional fitness stations including sled pushes, burpee jumps, rowing, and weighted lunges, made its debut in mainland China only in late 2024, marking one of its latest major market expansions. The Beijing race where the incident occurred was one of the brand’s early high-profile events in the country.

    Critics have raised questions about the lack of official intervention from race officials during the incident, pointing to Hyrox’s existing competition rules that penalize other unhygienic on-course behaviors including spitting, improper clearing of nasal discharge, littering, and misuse of water stations. The conversation has sparked broader discussion about event officiating protocols and athlete welfare at large-scale fitness competitions as Hyrox works to implement updates to its rules ahead of future events.

  • Zelensky appoints new chief prosecutor after predecessor’s corruption scandal

    Zelensky appoints new chief prosecutor after predecessor’s corruption scandal

    In a fresh shakeup to Ukraine’s top law enforcement ranks amid ongoing Russian invasion and a growing domestic anti-corruption push, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has named 42-year-old Anton Kovalskyi as the country’s new acting prosecutor general. This appointment follows the sudden resignation of former top prosecutor Ruslan Kravchenko, who stepped down last week after Ukrainian anti-corruption authorities executed search warrants at his offices in connection with an investigation into unregulated illegal call center operations across the country.

    The country’s two leading anti-corruption watchdogs — the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAP) — have uncovered what they describe as a sophisticated money laundering network operated by a senior official within Kravchenko’s former department. According to official investigators, the network accepted large bribes to shield fraudulent call centers that run global phone scams, and in the process laundered millions of dollars in illegal proceeds. Those illicit funds were then converted into high-value assets including residential and commercial real estate, luxury jewelry, and other high-end goods, investigators confirmed.

    Kravchenko has forcefully pushed back against all claims of personal involvement, dismissing the allegations against him and his department as entirely unsubstantiated. A day after issuing his denial, Kravchenko resigned from his post and subsequently departed Ukraine. He has levelled counter-accusations, claiming that critical documents were stolen during the office search in a plot to frame anti-corruption officials and cover up separate criminal wrongdoing within NABU and SAP. He also accused NABU Director Semen Kryvonos of forging documents in a decades-old legal case.

    All the allegations put forward by Kravchenko have been uniformly rejected by the two anti-corruption agencies. Kryvonos dismissed Kravchenko’s claims as nonsense, labeling them part of a coordinated, fierce campaign to derail ongoing high-stakes corruption investigations. In a statement, the NABU chief said the current push against his agency’s work is part of an unprecedented effort to disrupt the agency’s active probes, adding that anti-corruption detectives, their personal and official properties, and work vehicles have been placed under covert surveillance, though he did not name any specific parties behind the monitoring.

    “What we are seeing is a deliberate attempt to obstruct the work of NABU and SAP by gaining unauthorized access to sensitive details about upcoming planned investigations,” Kryvonos added. Currently, the two agencies are conducting corruption probes into several of Ukraine’s most high-profile public figures, including Zelensky’s former chief of staff Andriy Yermak, multiple former cabinet ministers, and other influential political actors. A lawyer representing Yermak has already dismissed all allegations against the former official as baseless.

    This latest scandal comes amid long-running tension between Zelensky’s administration and Ukraine’s independent anti-corruption bodies. In 2025, widespread nationwide protests erupted across Ukraine after Zelensky proposed reforms that would have reduced the institutional independence of NABU and SAP. Zelensky ultimately backed down from the plan and restored the agencies’ autonomy, but lingering questions have persisted about the Ukrainian government’s full commitment to rooting out systemic corruption at the highest levels of government — a key requirement for Ukraine’s ongoing integration with European institutions amid its war with Russia.