作者: admin

  • Strike over high fuel prices paralyses transport in Kenya

    Strike over high fuel prices paralyses transport in Kenya

    A nationwide strike by Kenya’s public transport operators has brought major parts of the East African nation to a standstill, as thousands of commuters are left stranded and economic activity grinds to a halt over a record-breaking jump in fuel prices that has deepened an already severe cost-of-living crisis.

    The industrial action, organized by the country’s Transport Sector Alliance (TSA), was launched days after Kenya’s Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (Epra) implemented a more than 20% increase in petroleum prices, pushing rates to all-time highs. As of last Thursday, diesel climbed to 242 Kenyan shillings ($1.80, £1.40) per liter, while petrol rose to $1.65 per liter.

    By Monday morning, key arterial roads in the capital Nairobi were nearly deserted. With nearly all public transit vehicles — including the ubiquitous local matatu minibuses — adhering to the shutdown, thousands of workers and students were forced to walk for miles to reach their destinations, while many businesses kept their doors closed and schools across affected regions advised students to stay home. Local television footage captured demonstrators barricading major thoroughfares and lighting bonfires to block vehicle access, with scattered reports of protesters harassing private motorists who defied the strike call. In multiple areas of Nairobi and other parts of the country, clashes broke out between security forces and demonstrators, with police deploying tear gas to disperse crowds. Ahead of the strike, law enforcement had already announced heightened security deployments and warned participants against engaging in disorderly conduct.

    The TSA, which coordinated the shutdown, extended the strike’s scope beyond transport operators, framing it as a collective action for all Kenyan households struggling with soaring living costs. In an official statement, the alliance said the industrial action was intended to pressure the government to reverse last week’s price hike and implement an overall 35% reduction in fuel costs. It accused the Kenyan government of failing to take meaningful action to protect ordinary citizens from the spiraling cost of fuel, which has already driven up prices for food, public transit fares, and nearly all other essential goods and services.

    The current fuel crisis stems from global supply chain disruptions tied to the US-Israel conflict with Iran that began in late February. Like many other sub-Saharan African nations, Kenya depends almost entirely on fuel imports from the Gulf region, a supply route thrown off balance by instability around the Strait of Hormuz — the strategic chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s daily oil supplies pass. While a ceasefire has been agreed, the strait remains blocked, keeping global oil prices elevated and passing higher costs directly on to Kenyan consumers.

    Kenyan officials have acknowledged the hardship caused by the price increase, but rejected the strikers’ demands and condemned the industrial action. Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi told local NTV on Monday that the fuel price hike was “unfortunate” and acknowledged that it was weighing heavily on the national economy. However, he argued that the strike was “completely uncalled for”, noting that the price surge is a global issue that cannot be resolved with domestic disruptive action. “Why are we trying to solve a global problem using domestic means?” Mbadi asked.

    The government has already taken one limited step to ease fuel costs: last month, it cut value-added tax on fuel from 16% to 8%, a reduction that is set to remain in place until July. But critics and advocacy groups say the move has not gone far enough to offset the massive price increases that have pushed household budgets to breaking point across the country.

  • Beijing’s zero-tariff policy in Africa hailed

    Beijing’s zero-tariff policy in Africa hailed

    When China rolled out its expanded zero-tariff policy for African exports earlier this month, the move was far more than a routine trade adjustment — it marked a landmark step forward in equitable South-South cooperation that experts say could reshape Africa’s position in global trade and value chains.

    Implemented on May 1, the new policy extends duty-free access to all 53 African nations that maintain diplomatic relations with China, expanding on a 2024 framework that only covered the continent’s 33 least developed countries. The policy change was the central focus of a recent online seminar hosted by the Africa-China Centre for Policy and Advisory based in Ghana, where trade and international relations experts broke down the initiative’s long-term potential and remaining challenges for African economies.

    Unlike unilateral preferential trade schemes offered by some Western powers, Tang Xiaoyang, chair and professor of the Department of International Relations at Tsinghua University, emphasized that China’s zero-tariff arrangement carries no binding political conditions. Framing the policy as a long-term framework for collaborative growth between developing nations rather than a short-term aid package, Tang noted that its core aligns with the core South-South principles of equality and mutual benefit. While early gains will likely flow to African agricultural exports — including coffee, fresh fruits, and seafood — the overarching goal is to drive broader industrial development and deeper integration of regional economies into Sino-African value chains, he added.

    The expansion adds major African economies including Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, and Ghana to the zero-tariff scheme, all of which already boast relatively mature export and manufacturing sectors. Tang explained that these economies are well-positioned to drive regional industrial progress via supply chain linkages and cross-border investment spillovers that benefit smaller neighboring nations.

    South African international affairs expert Mikatekiso Kubayi framed the policy as a critical opportunity for African countries to build economic self-reliance and accelerate industrialization at a time of growing global economic volatility. He pointed to the recent shipment of South African citrus to China under the new rules as an early indicator of the tangible market access gains the policy can deliver for African producers. Beyond direct trade benefits, Kubayi noted that deeper collaboration with China in research, technology, and innovation can help African economies evolve from passive importers of foreign technology to active, valued contributors to global production networks.

    While most experts expressed broad optimism about the policy’s transformative potential, many also stressed that duty-free access alone will not automatically translate to sustained development gains for African nations. Long-term success, they agree, hinges on African governments’ ability to address longstanding structural barriers that limit productive capacity and competitiveness.

    Wang Jinjie, a research professor at Peking University’s National School of Development and Institute of Area Studies, noted that the primary barrier facing African economies today is no longer access to global markets — it is the capacity to turn open market access into durable, inclusive industrial growth. “Opportunity doesn’t equal a development outcome by itself,” she explained, adding that most African nations continue to grapple with systemic constraints including underdeveloped logistics networks, limited local processing capacity, widespread skilled labor shortages, exorbitant transportation costs, and inconsistent quality control frameworks.

    Wang highlighted people-centered development initiatives emerging from China-Africa cooperation as a promising pathway to address these gaps, pointing specifically to the growing network of Luban Workshops across the continent. These vocational training programs, developed through bilateral cooperation, equip young African workers with technical skills tailored to growing sectors including manufacturing, agribusiness, and emerging green and digital industries.

    Rosemary Mnongya, a senior researcher at the Africa-China Centre for Policy and Advisory, echoed this outlook, urging African governments to reframe the policy opportunity to shift “from access to advantage.” To do this, she said, nations must prioritize local value addition and cross-border regional industrial cooperation, leveraging the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) framework to build integrated regional production networks that can compete more effectively in the Chinese market. For example, Mnongya pointed to value-addition models: processing Tanzanian avocados into higher-value avocado oil, or weaving Tanzanian cotton into fabric for Ethiopian garment manufacturers, before exporting the finished product to China under the zero-tariff scheme, to capture far greater economic benefit than exporting raw materials alone.

  • Strike halts New York commuter rail line

    Strike halts New York commuter rail line

    On Saturday, the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) — the busiest commuter rail system across North America — ground to a complete halt after unionized workers launched a work stoppage, the first major industrial action the line has seen in 30 years.

    Shortly after midnight, the entire rail network stopped operating. Five labor unions representing approximately half of the LIRR’s total workforce, totaling more than 3,500 employees ranging from locomotive engineers and signal technicians to ticket clerks, electricians, and machinists, walked off the job after months of stalled contract negotiations with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), the public agency that oversees operations of the LIRR.

    Negotiations between the two sides have hit an impasse over two core issues: worker wage adjustments and healthcare premium contributions. As of Saturday, no new bargaining sessions have been scheduled, according to Kevin Sexton, national vice-president of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen.

    By Saturday afternoon, the LIRR’s central hub, Manhattan’s Penn Station, bore little resemblance to its usual crowded weekend self. The bustling main concourse that normally teems with thousands of daily commuters hosted only a few dozen people, most of whom were transiting through the station to access unaffected Amtrak intercity services. Departure boards that once display upcoming LIRR trips by destination now carry unusual entries for “ghost trains” marked “No Passengers,” while hand-placed signs on locked customer service windows inform travelers of the strike-related shutdown. Barricades and roll-down gates block access to LIRR platforms, with MTA police officers posted to redirect displaced commuters to alternative travel options.

    While the shutdown was felt immediately on Saturday, transportation officials and commuters are bracing for far more severe disruption when the workweek begins on Monday. On an average weekday, the LIRR carries nearly 300,000 commuters traveling between New York City and Long Island’s eastern suburbs. Displaced riders will need to rely on limited alternative bus service, which can only accommodate roughly 13,000 passengers during both morning and evening rush hours, or opt to drive into the city, despite ongoing elevated gas prices that already strain household budgets.

    Speaking on the picket line outside Penn Station Saturday morning, union member Duane O’Connor acknowledged the widespread inconvenience the strike would impose on ordinary commuters and local communities, but emphasized that workers are only demanding fair compensation. “I feel terrible. Terrible. This is going to hurt. This is going to hurt the island, this is going to hurt the city … All we are asking for is fair wages,” O’Connor said.

    This work stoppage marks just the fourth strike in LIRR’s recorded history, and the first since 1994. Previous strikes between 1980 and 1994 lasted anywhere from two to 11 days, leaving uncertainty for commuters who rely on the line for daily travel, as no end to the current shutdown is in sight with no new talks scheduled.

  • Petrochemical crunch hits supply chains across Asia

    Petrochemical crunch hits supply chains across Asia

    More than 11 weeks into the ongoing US-Israeli military campaign against Iran, widespread economic disruption is rippling through the interconnected industrial supply chains of Asia, driven by a rapidly deepening shortage of critical petrochemical products, most notably naphtha. Before the outbreak of hostilities, nearly all naphtha exported from Middle Eastern producers was destined for Asian markets, according to Darryl Xu, principal analyst for base chemicals and feedstocks at ICIS Analytics based in Singapore. Middle Eastern suppliers account for roughly 65% of all naphtha imports into Asia, but shipping disruptions along the Strait of Hormuz have halted the vast majority of these cargoes, and alternative supply sources are unable to fully offset the gap, Xu explained. Naphtha, a fundamental derivative of crude petroleum, is a core input for manufacturing solvents and the resin used in commercial printing inks. Persistent supply shortages have the potential to disrupt sectors spanning food packaging, consumer goods, medical equipment manufacturing and infrastructure construction materials across the region. Last week, major Japanese snack manufacturer Calbee announced it would transition packaging for a selection of its potato chip lines to simplified black-and-white packaging, labeled explicitly as “packaging for conserving petroleum materials.” “The company will revise the packaging specifications of some of its products as an interim measure, with the highest priority placed on ensuring a stable supply of products,” Calbee stated in an official release Tuesday. Despite these industry adaptations, Japanese Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kei Sato told reporters the Japanese government had not received any reports of immediate, widespread disruptions to naphtha or printing ink supplies, and maintains the country has secured sufficient stockpiles to meet near-term demand, Reuters reported. In the Republic of Korea, growing anxiety is mounting across the food packaging sector, as the national government works to implement emergency measures to stabilize volatile supplies. Local industry leaders report that raw material costs have surged 40 to 50% since the outbreak of the conflict. The ROK and Japan rank among the most vulnerable Northeast Asian economies to naphtha supply shocks, explained Kwon Seok-joon, an associate professor of chemical engineering at Sungkyunkwan University. In the first half of 2026, roughly 45 to 47% of the ROK’s total naphtha supply is imported, and more than three-quarters of those imported volumes originate from Middle Eastern producers, Kwon noted. Beyond the immediate shipping disruptions, the greater long-term risk stems from the structural vulnerabilities inherent in the ROK’s petrochemical sector, which is structured around naphtha refining, Kwon added. While Japan also faces high exposure to supply disruptions, the ROK’s vertically integrated petrochemical industry is far more dependent on naphtha-based refineries, leaving downstream manufacturing sectors including plastics, rubber, packaging and paints disproportionately exposed to shocks. “If the current situation continues for several more months, the sustainability of these industries could become very fragile,” Kwon warned. Even if full navigation through the Strait of Hormuz is restored immediately, naphtha supplies will not rebound quickly to pre-conflict levels, due to accumulated shipping backlogs, permanently elevated freight and insurance costs, and mismatched contracting terms between existing Middle Eastern supply agreements and newly sourced alternative cargoes, he added. Following the outbreak of the crisis, buyers are now paying price premiums of up to $150 per metric ton to secure available naphtha cargoes, Xu said, while major Asian producers of plastics and olefins — the foundational building blocks of the global petrochemical sector — have been forced to cut operating rates to minimum levels. Even at reduced output, a single large olefins plant still requires more than 150,000 tons of naphtha to maintain operations. Kwon projected that the ongoing crisis will likely compel policymakers and industry leaders across major Asian economies to implement long-term structural adjustments to reduce reliance on single-source Middle Eastern energy and petrochemical inputs.

  • Iran’s World Cup football team leaves for Turkey: media

    Iran’s World Cup football team leaves for Turkey: media

    As the 2026 FIFA World Cup co-hosted by the United States, Mexico and Canada draws near, Iran’s national men’s football team has embarked on the first leg of its journey to the tournament, departing for the Turkish coastal city of Antalya on Monday, according to local Iranian media reports. The trip is designed to serve two key purposes: finalize pre-tournament preparation through warm-up friendly matches, and complete long-delayed visa applications required to enter the U.S. for the global competition.

    The 22-player squad, all currently based at domestic Iranian clubs, traveled alongside full coaching staff, Iran’s Tasnim News Agency confirmed. While in Antalya, the team is scheduled to hold at least two friendly matches, with a fixture against The Gambia already locked in for May 29, per Sam Mehdizadeh, an Iranian-Canadian sports executive who arranges exhibition matches for the Iranian national side.

    Uncertainty has loomed over Iran’s participation for months, even after the team secured its place in the 48-nation tournament back in March 2025. The tension stems from a sharp escalation in hostilities between the U.S.-Israeli alliance and Iran dating back to February 28, when Washington launched a large-scale wave of offensive attacks against Tehran in what amounted to an open state of conflict. A ceasefire has paused active fighting for several weeks, but recent events have reignited fears of a return to violence: fresh drone strikes targeting Gulf nations over the weekend, paired with new inflammatory rhetoric from U.S. President Donald Trump, have further destabilized the already fragile security environment.

    Despite the geopolitical rift, top U.S. officials have repeatedly stated that Iranian players are welcome to compete in the tournament. FIFA has also reaffirmed that Iran’s participation will proceed as planned, rejecting a request from Iranian football authorities to relocate the team’s group stage matches to co-hosts Mexico or Canada. President Trump even publicly voiced support in late April, saying “I think let ‘em play.”

    Still, significant bureaucratic hurdles remain. As of this week, no U.S. visas have been issued to the Iranian delegation, Iranian Football Federation chief Mehdi Taj confirmed to local media Thursday. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has already signaled that complications could arise for non-playing members of the delegation, noting that potential issues center on figures the U.S. suspects of ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which Washington has formally designated a terrorist organization. Taj himself is a former IRGC member, a designation that has already created friction: last month, the entire Iranian federation delegation abandoned a planned trip to the FIFA Congress in Canada after what they described as degrading treatment from Canadian immigration officials, who flagged Taj’s ties to the IRGC, which Canada also lists as a terrorist group.

    Over the weekend, FIFA Secretary General Mattias Grafstrom held a high-stakes meeting with Iranian federation representatives in Turkey to work through outstanding logistics. Both sides characterized the discussion as constructive, offering a small glimmer of progress amid the ongoing uncertainty. If the delegation secures the required visas in time, Iran will set up its official pre-tournament base camp in Tucson, Arizona. The team is drawn into Group G, with its opening group stage match scheduled for June 15 against New Zealand in Los Angeles, followed by a second fixture against Belgium also in Los Angeles, and a final group game against Egypt in Seattle.

    The team held an official send-off ceremony in Tehran last week, but even as players depart for preparation, questions about whether they will ultimately be allowed to step onto the pitch at the World Cup continue to hang over the campaign.

  • Congo health minister announces 3 Ebola treatment centers in Ituri amid ongoing outbreak

    Congo health minister announces 3 Ebola treatment centers in Ituri amid ongoing outbreak

    DAKAR, Senegal – As a rare and deadly Ebola outbreak continues its spread across the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo and spill over into neighboring Uganda, global and national health authorities have ramped up emergency responses, marking one of the most pressing public health crises in Africa this year. During an official visit to the Ebola-impacted Ituri region Sunday evening, Congolese Health Minister Samuel Roger Kamba announced the launch of three new dedicated Ebola treatment centers to expand strained care capacity in the hard-hit area. Standing in Bunia, Ituri’s provincial capital and largest urban center, Kamba acknowledged that existing local healthcare facilities are already overwhelmed by a surge of patients showing Ebola symptoms, but emphasized that the new facilities will boost the country’s ability to care for infected people and slow transmission. The World Health Organization had formally designated the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) – the WHO’s highest level of global public health alert – earlier the same day, following weeks of rising case counts. As of the announcement, officials have recorded more than 300 suspected Ebola cases, with 88 confirmed fatalities in the DRC and two additional deaths in Uganda, where the virus has crossed the shared border. While the epicenter of the outbreak remains Ituri, suspected cases have already been documented as far as Kinshasa, the DRC’s national capital, and Goma, the largest city in the country’s eastern region, raising alarms about potential wider spread across Central Africa. In a separate post to the social platform X Sunday, the WHO Regional Office for Africa confirmed that a joint 35-member expert team from the global health body and the Congolese Ministry of Health has already deployed to Bunia, carrying 7 tons of critical emergency medical supplies and protective equipment to support response efforts. Ebola is a highly contagious viral pathogen that spreads through direct contact with infected bodily fluids including blood, vomit, and semen. While the disease is relatively rare, it causes severe, often fatal organ damage and bleeding in a majority of untreated cases. What makes the current outbreak particularly alarming for public health experts is that it is caused by the Bundibugyo virus, a rare Ebola variant that was only confirmed as the source of this outbreak this past Friday. No officially approved vaccines or targeted therapeutics currently exist for this specific strain, creating a critical gap in response capacity. Prior to 2024, the Bundibugyo variant has only been detected two other times in recorded history: first in Uganda’s Bundibugyo District during a 2007–2008 outbreak that sickened 149 people and killed 37, and again in a 2012 outbreak in the DRC’s Isiro region that recorded 57 cases and 29 deaths. Speaking to Sky News Sunday, Jean Kaseya, Director-General of the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, acknowledged the urgent gaps in the global response, saying, “Currently I’m on panic mode because people are dying, I don’t have medicines, I don’t have vaccine to support countries.” Kaseya added that he has convened an emergency meeting of all global public health and aid partners to advance access to experimental candidate vaccines and therapeutics, with the goal of rolling out limited supplies to impacted areas in the coming weeks. The WHO’s PHEIC designation is only triggered when an outbreak meets three strict criteria: it poses a serious enough threat to global health to require coordinated action, it carries a significant risk of international spread across borders, and it demands a unified, cross-country response. Global health leaders hope the declaration will accelerate funding commitments from donor nations and spur rapid action from pharmaceutical partners to make experimental treatments available to frontline teams. With more than 20 previous Ebola outbreaks recorded across the DRC and Uganda over the past half century, health authorities have well-established protocols for containing viral spread, but the lack of targeted tools for the rare Bundibugyo variant has created an unprecedented challenge for the current response.

  • Russia unleashes another aerial barrage on Ukraine as the war’s long-range strikes escalate

    Russia unleashes another aerial barrage on Ukraine as the war’s long-range strikes escalate

    Fresh waves of large-scale reciprocal long-range strikes between Russian and Ukrainian forces have sent civilian casualty numbers climbing and ratcheted up tensions in the more than four-year full-scale invasion, just days before Russian President Vladimir Putin’s scheduled meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed Monday that Russian forces launched a massive overnight aerial assault across eight Ukrainian regions, deploying a total arsenal of 524 attack drones alongside 22 ballistic and cruise missiles. The central Dnipropetrovsk region, anchored by the major city of Dnipro, absorbed the heaviest blow from the barrage, with bombardment persisting for six consecutive hours that targeted both energy infrastructure and residential areas. Ukraine’s State Emergency Service reported at least 26 wounded civilians across the region, including two children. Additional structural damage and casualties were recorded in Ukraine’s Odesa, Chernihiv, and Zaporizhzhia regions, bringing the total number of injured civilians across the country to more than two dozen, including three children overall. This latest attack follows a string of intensifying large-scale Russian strikes that gained momentum after a brief May 9-11 ceasefire called at the request of former U.S. President Donald Trump, a proposal that failed to produce any lasting reduction in hostilities. Just one week prior, a multi-day Russian bombardment flattened a residential apartment building in Kyiv, killing 24 people. To date, U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to broker a lasting peace settlement have yet to yield tangible progress, with no formal negotiations or draft agreement currently in development.

    The escalation is not one-sided: just one day before Russia’s latest attack, Ukraine carried out one of its largest cross-border drone strikes on Russian territory to date. Russian local authorities confirmed Sunday that the attack killed at least four people, three of whom died in suburbs near Moscow, and left a dozen more injured. Over more than four years of full-scale conflict, Ukraine has methodically built up its domestic long-range strike capabilities, allowing it to consistently target key assets deep inside Russia, including critical oil infrastructure that forms the backbone of the Russian federal budget. These deep strikes have drawn widespread attention from the Russian public and increased domestic pressure on Putin, who made the questionable claim earlier this month that the war was nearing its conclusion even as his ground forces struggle to secure significant territorial gains across the front line.

    Zelenskyy framed these expanding capabilities as a transformative turning point in the conflict. In a post to the social platform X Sunday evening, he noted, “Our long-range capabilities are significantly changing the situation — and, more broadly, the world’s perception of Russia’s war. Many partners are now signaling that they see what is happening and how everything has changed — both in attitudes toward this war and in the reachability of Russian targets on Russian territory.”

    Russian defense officials pushed back on Sunday, announcing that their air defense systems had intercepted or jammed more than 1,000 Ukrainian drones over the preceding 24-hour period, with roughly 80 of those unmanned vehicles headed toward the Moscow region. Separately, the ministry confirmed Monday that between late Sunday and early Monday, air defenses shot down a total of 50 Ukrainian drones across multiple regions.

    The rising violence comes as Putin prepares to travel to Beijing this week for high-level talks with Xi. In the years since Russia launched its full-scale invasion, political and economic cooperation between Moscow and Beijing has deepened substantially, even as most Western nations have moved to diplomatically and economically isolate the Kremlin.

    This reporting draws from on-the-field contributions from AP correspondent Henry Hatton, based in Lisbon, Portugal. Full coverage of the Russia-Ukraine conflict is available on AP News’ dedicated conflict hub.

  • Mark Latham’s ex denies insider trading, punching former Labor leader in extraordinary reply

    Mark Latham’s ex denies insider trading, punching former Labor leader in extraordinary reply

    A high-profile political drama has unfolded in New South Wales parliament, where Nathalie Matthews, the former partner of ex-Labor and One Nation NSW leader Mark Latham, has issued a scathing full-throated denial of a series of explosive claims made against her by her ex-partner, including allegations of insider trading, a drunken drug-fueled assault, and unethical financial arrangements.

    Matthews, a one-time Liberal Party local council candidate who is currently fighting separate, unrelated revenge porn criminal charges (to which she has already pleaded not guilty), laid out her rebuttal in a formally tabled citizens’ reply last week, pushing back against what she describes as false, damaging defamation that has gutted her professional standing.

    According to Matthews’ submission, Latham invoked her name a staggering 44 separate times during a November 12 debate in the NSW Legislative Council, where he leveled multiple incendiary accusations. Among these claims were assertions that she had accepted a $145,000 payment and confidential insider trading tips from Richard White, the billionaire tech co-founder of logistics software firm WiseTech, that she had carried out a “zombie-like drunken and drugged attack” that ended with her punching Latham in the head following their breakup, that she had engaged in a sexual relationship with businessman Paul Byrne, and that Byrne had covered the cost of her London flight.

    Matthews has rejected every single one of these claims point-by-point. “I never punched Mr Latham and I was not under the influence of any prescribed drug or illicit narcotic,” she stated in her reply. She further denied any romantic or financial connection to Byrne, refuting the claims of a paid flight entirely. On the insider trading allegations, she made clear she has never received the $145,000 payment from White, never been given confidential market information by him, and has never received any correspondence or regulatory notice from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) related to insider trading claims.

    The former Liberal candidate emphasized that Latham’s false remarks have triggered widespread negative media coverage that has eroded public trust in her character and left her professional reputation irreparably harmed, to date.

    The NSW Parliament Privileges Committee ultimately voted to release Matthews’ full rebuttal, though the move was not without opposition. Independent Member of the Legislative Council Rod Roberts issued a dissenting opinion, arguing that the submission was “frivolous and vexatious and it contains inaccuracies.”

    This public back-and-forth is only the latest chapter in a long-running bitter public dispute between the two figures. Last year, Matthews applied for and received an apprehended violence order against Latham, alleging he had committed serious domestic abuse including defecating on her – all claims Latham has repeatedly and categorically denied.

  • Protesters light bonfires during public transport strike in Kenya over fuel prices

    Protesters light bonfires during public transport strike in Kenya over fuel prices

    On a Monday morning in Kenya’s capital Nairobi, widespread public protests erupted alongside a coordinated national public transport strike, called to oppose a historic surge in national fuel prices that has sent shockwaves through the East African economy. The industrial action brought the country’s most populous urban center to a standstill: commuters were left trapped across suburban neighborhoods, with central business districts largely empty of daily activity. Protesters set fire to tires along major arterial roads, prompting most private motorists to avoid travel entirely and keep their vehicles parked at home. In response to the unrest, the Kenya Association of Private Schools issued guidance for member institutions to prioritize student safety, leading the vast majority of schools across the affected region to shift to remote online learning for the day. The catalyst for the unrest came just four days prior, when Kenya’s energy regulators announced a new round of fuel price adjustments that pushed costs to all-time record highs. The update set diesel prices up by 23.5% and gasoline prices up by 8% nationwide, a jump far steeper than many households and businesses had anticipated. As of Monday, President William Ruto—who is currently traveling outside of Kenya—had not issued any public statement addressing the new price levels or the resulting protests. This is not the first time Kenya has faced a politically charged fuel price crisis: during an earlier price review in April, Ruto attributed a previous jump to global market volatility tied to the Iran conflict, and intervened to cut fuel taxes in order to prevent a similarly sharp increase at that time. Kenya’s leading business advocacy group, the Kenya National Chamber of Commerce and Industry, sounded the alarm over the price hike within hours of its announcement Friday. In an official statement, the chamber warned that elevated fuel costs would ripple through every sector of the national economy, driving up prices for nearly all consumer goods and public services. The organization also pushed back against claims that the surge is driven solely by global market trends, noting that between April and May, global crude oil prices rose only around 10.7% — less than half the percentage increase seen for Kenyan diesel prices over the same window. “This points to the continued role of domestic cost buildup,” the statement read, indicating that internal factors beyond global shifts are contributing to the extreme price jump. The political opposition has seized on the crisis to criticize the Ruto administration. Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, who was impeached on corruption charges in October 2024 before aligning with the national opposition, has placed the blame for the sharp surge on corrupt business elites he says are inflating prices to pad their own profit margins. Gachagua pointed out a striking comparative inconsistency: neighboring landlocked nations that import all of their fuel through Kenyan ports—including Uganda—actually have lower retail fuel prices than Kenya, despite the additional cross-border transport costs those imports incur. As a regional trade hub, Kenya handles the vast majority of fuel and goods imports for multiple East African inland nations, with all cargo moving overland from the Indian Ocean port of Mombasa. As the strike and protests enter their first day, the Kenyan public is waiting for a formal response from President Ruto, with widespread anxiety over how the fuel price increase will erode already strained household budgets across the country.

  • Philippine senate convenes as impeachment court to try vice president as political storm rages

    Philippine senate convenes as impeachment court to try vice president as political storm rages

    MANILA, Philippines — A high-stakes political crisis has engulfed the Philippines, as the country’s Senate convened an impeachment court Monday to try Vice President Sara Duterte on a slate of criminal allegations, just days after a violent gunfight erupted inside the chamber amid escalating power struggles between the nation’s top two leaders. The proceedings mark the climax of weeks of growing tension between Duterte and her former political ally, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., that has laid bare the deep ideological and partisan divides that have long troubled the Southeast Asian democracy.

    The impeachment proceedings got their start one week prior, when the Philippine House of Representatives voted by a wide majority to advance three core charges against Duterte: unexplained unexplained wealth, misuse of public state funds, and a public threat to assassinate President Marcos Jr. if she were killed amid their ongoing political feud. A rising political figure who has already publicly announced her intent to run for the presidency in the 2028 national election, Duterte has issued a blanket denial of all charges but has declined to respond to the specific allegations in any detail.

    The crisis is deeply tied to the legal troubles of Duterte’s father, former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, who was taken into custody by the International Criminal Court (ICC) earlier this year on charges of crimes against humanity. Those charges stem from the former president’s deadly nationwide anti-drug crackdown, launched during his six years in office, that left thousands of mostly low-level, petty drug suspects dead. Sara Duterte has publicly blamed Marcos Jr. for orchestrating what she calls the “kidnapping” of her ailing father, referring to his March arrest and transfer to ICC custody in The Hague.

    The path to this week’s impeachment trial has already been marked by dramatic, unprecedented chaos in the Senate. Last Monday, 13 of the chamber’s 24 senators — led by a bloc of close Duterte allies — launched a surprise power grab to oust the sitting Senate president and install their own candidate, Alan Peter Cayetano, leaving the final outcome of the impeachment trial deeply uncertain. The power play relied entirely on the unexpected appearance of Senator Ronald dela Rosa, a long-time Duterte confidant who had spent months in hiding to avoid an ICC arrest warrant.

    Dela Rosa, who served as national police chief during Rodrigo Duterte’s anti-drug crackdown, was named by the ICC as a co-conspirator in the alleged crimes against humanity, and the court unsealed an arrest warrant for him just last Monday. After months in self-imposed hiding, Dela Rosa emerged last week, traveling to the Senate in a van arranged by Cayetano. When National Bureau of Investigation agents moved to arrest him upon his arrival, Dela Rosa fled into the Senate complex, darting up a stairwell to the plenary hall, where Cayetano and his bloc placed him under the chamber’s official “protective custody.”

    What followed was a days-long tense standoff between Senate security personnel and NBI agents, who had positioned themselves in an adjacent government building. The standoff boiled over into open gunfire Wednesday night, when Senate security fired what their chief Mao Aplasca described as warning shots toward the agents. In the aftermath of the shooting, President Marcos addressed the nation in a late-night national television broadcast, urging the public to remain calm amid the escalating unrest.

    In a new twist that deepened suspicions of political sabotage, Cayetano later confirmed that Dela Rosa had disappeared from the protected Senate chamber. Government investigators are now probing whether the gunfight was deliberately instigated by Duterte allies to create enough chaos to allow Dela Rosa to slip away from custody entirely. With the impeachment trial now underway and control of the Senate still contested, the Philippines faces one of its most severe political crises in recent decades, as the rivalry between the Marcos and Duterte political clans spills out into open institutional conflict.