作者: admin

  • Weekly quiz: Eurovision went mad for Bangaranga – but who gave the UK its only point?

    Weekly quiz: Eurovision went mad for Bangaranga – but who gave the UK its only point?

    Over the past seven days, a series of diverse developments across global politics, public health, and sports have grabbed headlines, alongside a curated news quiz to test readers’ awareness of events beyond the biggest stories. This week, former U.S. President Donald Trump issued a public warning to Taiwan, cautioning against any moves toward a unilateral declaration of independence. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the ongoing Ebola outbreak has continued to take a devastating toll, with the cumulative death count climbing steadily as public health responders work to contain the spread of the virus. In a far lighter milestone for British sport, global icon Sir David Beckham made history by becoming the first professional athlete from the United Kingdom to amass a personal net worth exceeding $1 billion.

    Beyond these three high-profile stories, the roundup challenges readers to reflect on how closely they have followed other global events that unfolded over the week. The collection of quiz questions has been put together by editor Ben Fell, who has curated the test to gauge readers’ knowledge of recent global happenings. For those eager to test their knowledge further, organizers point to additional resources: readers can access last week’s quiz for another round of testing, or explore a deep archive of past quizzes covering previous weeks’ events. This roundup is also categorized alongside broader coverage of pop culture, music, television, and the long-running annual Eurovision Song Contest.

  • Oxford Union’s Palestinian president on why she invited Tommy Robinson to debate Islam

    Oxford Union’s Palestinian president on why she invited Tommy Robinson to debate Islam

    The Oxford Union, one of the world’s most famous and storied collegiate debating societies, finds itself at the center of yet another firestorm, this time over a decision that cuts straight to the heart of global conversations about free speech, religious scrutiny, and the line between hate speech and open debate. The flashpoint? A planned debate titled “This House believes the West is right to be suspicious of Islam”, featuring an invitation to far-right anti-Islam activist Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, a man with multiple criminal convictions including for assault, fraud, and contempt of court. What makes the controversy even more unexpected is that the invitation came from the union’s current president, 20-year-old Arwa Elrayess — a Muslim student of Palestinian origin.

    Middle East Eye traveled to the University of Oxford this week to meet Elrayess in the union’s historic wood-panelled Gladstone Room, a space steeped in British political legacy. Named for former British prime minister and one-time union president William Gladstone, the room features soaring painted ceilings, shelves lined with centuries of national newspaper archives, and plush leather armchairs that once served as seating for the society’s smoking room in a more permissive era. The semi-circular cabinet table by the window, where Gladstone once met his ministers, is said to have been designed specifically so the former leader could look every minister directly in the eye to spot dishonesty — a detail Elrayess shared with a nod to the confrontational conversation ahead.

    Robinson, a polarizing figure who has built his public profile on anti-Islam activism, recently drew 60,000 attendees to a London rally where he declared he would “stop Islam” if he gained power, called on supporters to “prepare for the Battle of Britain”, and demanded that many Muslims leave the United Kingdom. When asked if these comments qualified as hate speech, Elrayess did not mince words: “I think everything that was said was abhorrent.” But she remains unwavering in her commitment to holding the debate, a stance shaped directly by her own experience as a Muslim and Palestinian student at Oxford.

    In her first year at the university, during the Israeli military campaign in Gaza that Elrayess refers to as genocide, she debated an Israeli soldier on the union floor. At the time, she had family still living in Gaza, making her one of the most personally invested participants in that room. She recalled that experience as deeply empowering: “I could not have thought of anything more vindicating than to be able to stand up there and be given equal weight, and to be able to give my views. People came up to me from all different backgrounds and said, ‘thank you so much for getting to say the things that I wanted to say, but I don’t think we ever had the opportunity.’”

    That experience shaped Elrayess’s core philosophy on inviting controversial figures: inviting a speaker does not grant them moral legitimacy, it simply acknowledges that their views hold enough public influence to require direct scrutiny. “What we are saying is that their views are influential and consequential enough that they deserve to be scrutinized,” she explained. She added that she wants to challenge the harmful perception that Muslims seek to avoid scrutiny of their faith: “I wanted to prove that it is within a Muslim’s term, that I was willing to have this conversation. I’m not afraid to have my faith scrutinised because I know I can defend it. I’m not afraid to hear this rhetoric because I know what I think about it, and I want to be able to give other Muslim speakers or other Muslim students the same opportunity I had when I first came to Oxford, to be able to look someone in the eye who’s done so much harm to your communities and tell them exactly why they’re wrong.”

    Elrayess also pushed back against claims of hypocrisy leveled by Roshan Salih, editor of British Muslim news site 5 Pillars, who has called for her resignation over the unresolved 2024 controversy surrounding Palestinian writer Susan Abulhawa. Last year, Abulhawa’s speech criticizing Israel was deleted and edited from the Oxford Union’s YouTube channel, a decision Elrayess — who was not president at the time — has openly condemned as censorship. She told Middle East Eye that she is working behind the scenes to restore the unedited full speech to the platform before her term ends: “I cannot imagine leaving my term without that video going back up.”

    The decision to invite Robinson has drawn fierce condemnation from across the British political and religious establishment. Labour MP and former cabinet minister Anneliese Dodds, whose constituency covers Oxford East, said this week that “The hatred promoted by Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, also known as Tommy Robinson, has no place in our great city.” The Bishop of Oxford Dr Steven Croft and Imam Monawar Hussain released a joint statement saying they were “disturbed and saddened by the event”, arguing that union leadership “have a duty of care to the many thousands of Muslims, Jews and others of different faiths in the city.”

    Robinson is already persona non grata across most major British institutions: the National Union of Students maintains an official de-platforming policy for him, right-wing media outlet GB News has never extended an invitation for him to appear, and the right-wing Reform UK party has stated he is not welcome within its ranks. Large-scale protests are planned for the day of the debate, scheduled just over a week from now, and security concerns have led many to predict the event will be cancelled entirely. Multiple scheduled speakers have already withdrawn from the debate, with independent MP Adnan Hussain confirming his withdrawal last week over Robinson’s involvement. Some speakers have even threatened to pull out of all future union events in protest.

    Contrary to widespread claims of Muslim opposition to the invitation, however, Elrayess says many Muslim students have privately expressed their support. A poll conducted by 5 Pillars — the same outlet whose editor called for her resignation — found that a majority of its readers also backed holding the debate. Elrayess argues that hiding controversial views from public debate does not make them disappear: “It’s not that these issues will go away if Robinson can’t speak at the union. The real danger is when these conversations are having nobody there to confront them or scrutinise them.” If Robinson attempts to violate British free speech laws during the event, she added, the debate will be immediately halted and he will be removed from the chamber, under the union’s strict existing rules.

    This controversy is only the latest in a 200-year history of the Oxford Union sparking national and global outcry over its commitment to open debate. Founded in 1823 by a group of students rebelling against university censorship, the society has long served as a training ground for future British political leaders and a magnet for contentious conversations. In 1933, it passed a motion declaring “This House would not in any circumstances fight for King and Country”, drawing fierce condemnation from Winston Churchill, who called the resolution “abject, squalid, shameless” and “nauseating”. In 1964, civil rights leader Malcolm X spoke on the union floor in defense of extremism in the name of liberty; former U.S. president Richard Nixon spoke there four years after his resignation over the Watergate scandal; O.J. Simpson drew global headlines when he addressed the union shortly after his acquittal on murder charges; and the British government once banned broadcasts of a speech by Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams. Just last year, the union drew widespread condemnation from conservative media after members voted overwhelmingly to declare Israel an “apartheid state responsible for genocide”.

    The core question at the heart of this debate is not new: when does a view become so dangerous that it deserves to be de-platformed entirely? The argument for barring extreme voices was famously laid out by philosopher Bertrand Russell in 1962, when he rebuffed an invitation to debate British fascist leader Oswald Mosley. “It is always difficult to decide on how to respond to people whose ethos is so alien and, in fact, repellent to one’s own,” Russell wrote. “Nothing fruitful or sincere could ever emerge from association between us.”

    But the Oxford Union has long stood by the opposite principle, a legacy that former British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan once summed up by calling the institution “the last bastion of free speech in the western world.” Whether the Robinson debate goes ahead as planned or is cancelled due to pressure and security concerns, the controversy itself carries on the union’s long tradition of forcing the world to confront the hardest questions about free speech, power, and the price of open dialogue. It is a debate that will continue to rage, both inside the union’s historic chambers and far beyond the walls of Oxford’s university.

  • Iranian press review: State TV airs weapons training

    Iranian press review: State TV airs weapons training

    Against a backdrop of escalating regional tensions tied to the U.S.-Israeli conflict, Iran’s state-controlled public broadcaster has introduced a dramatic shift in programming, rolling out weapons training segments that mark a new escalation of militarized messaging on national airwaves. The Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), the country’s sole television network, remains firmly under the control of hardline political factions, with its top leadership directly appointed by Iran’s Supreme Leader. The new training content walks viewers through step-by-step demonstrations of assembling, disassembling, and operating standard military firearms including Kalashnikov rifles and PK machine guns.

    One particularly striking live segment on IRIB’s Channel 3 featured a masked instructor in an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) uniform walking audiences through Kalashnikov handling. After the host prepared the weapon, he received formal permission from the IRGC officer to open fire on a United Arab Emirates flag displayed inside the studio, carrying out the provocative act live on air. In a separate live outdoor segment, a male presenter joined pro-establishment crowds gathered in central Tehran’s main public squares, firing a shot into the sky directly in front of rolling cameras. He framed the action as a warning to potential foreign adversaries, noting, “This was just a shot for fun, but if necessary, each of us will take up arms and cut off the ear of those who want to invade this land.”

    Militarized messaging on state television has not been limited to male on-air personalities. Prominent pro-establishment presenter Mobina Nasiri appeared on live broadcast holding a Kalashnikov, stating that she had recently been issued the weapon and stands ready to join combat against Israel and the United States if called upon.

    Alongside this shift in state broadcasting, a new report from U.S.-based Iranian human rights monitoring agency HRANA documents a sharp deterioration in Iran’s human rights climate since the escalation of the U.S.-Israeli conflict. Between February 28 and April 8 alone, HRANA records more than 4,000 arrests on broadly defined security-related charges, ranging from espionage and threatening national security to spreading unapproved war-related information and cooperating with what Iranian authorities label hostile foreign states. The same period saw 50 people executed across the country, 32 of whom were charged with political or security-linked offenses, according to the report. Prison conditions have deteriorated dramatically, while Iranian authorities have expanded security checkpoints across urban centers and tightened restrictions on civilian movement. Most notably, HRANA confirms that child as young as 12 years old are being deployed to staff these checkpoints, a practice that has drawn widespread international condemnation.

    The new hardline direction of IRIB programming has also sparked public controversy over a recent inflammatory remark targeting the Iranian Red Crescent Society. During a live on-site segment with pro-establishment demonstrators in Tehran, a host asked a gathered participant, “Who is more despicable than the Red Crescent rescue dogs?” The comment drew swift backlash from Red Crescent rescue personnel, who spoke out publicly against the remark in an interview with independent Iranian outlet Khabar Online. Omid Barzegari, a rescue dog trainer with the organization, pushed back sharply on the insult, emphasizing the critical work these animals do to locate survivors trapped under rubble following U.S. and Israeli strikes. “These dogs are rescue angels,” Barzegari said. “Each of us and these dogs works as a team. These dogs are not despicable. They are trained to serve the people.”

    The interview went viral across Iranian media platforms, sparking widespread public criticism of both the remark and IRIB’s leadership. One Iranian viewer wrote online, “There is not a single person with common sense among the policymakers of this gigantic [IRIB] organisation, this has nothing but terrible costs for the people.” The public friction around the comment ties into long-standing restrictions on dog ownership in Iran, where conservative authorities have enforced bans on public dog walking based on strict interpretations of Islamic law.

    Beyond Iran’s borders, controversy has erupted over recent demonstrations by exiled Iranian monarchist supporters that have drawn condemnation from Iranians both inside the country and in the diaspora. In recent weeks, groups backing Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran’s deposed last shah, have held military-style parades in European cities including London, Copenhagen, and Regensburg, Germany, while carrying flags associated with Savak — the shah-era intelligence agency notorious for systemic human rights abuses and political repression. Critics have compared the aesthetic and organizational structure of the parades to fascist rallies that preceded World War II, and the displays sparked fierce backlash across Persian-language social media.

    Many social media users have mocked and condemned the events, with one creating a viral edited version of the Savak logo that replaces the iconic lion with a ketchup bottle to satirize what many see as the movement’s hollow posturing. Another Iranian user criticized the exclusionary nationalist rhetoric used during the parades, posting an ethnic map of Iran to the platform X and writing, “I don’t want to hear Iran shouted like this from these people. Their Iran is nothing like our Iran.”

    In recent months, growing numbers of Iranians have publicly criticized exiled monarchist factions, which receive open backing from Israel, for supporting foreign military strikes on Iran. Despite this widespread domestic criticism, many major international media outlets continue to frame monarchist leaders as the primary face of the Iranian opposition to the Islamic Republic. That disconnect has drawn frustration from many Iranian social media users, who note the contrast between the exiled faction’s public displays and the risks faced by dissidents inside Iran. “In the bitter days when the brave children of Iran are being led to the gallows, part of the diaspora is putting on ridiculous shows,” one Persian-speaking user wrote on X. “They have turned the real struggle and the price people pay inside the country into vulgarity abroad, and unfortunately, the world only sees this picture.”

    This report is compiled as an Iranian press digest, and its content has not been independently verified by Middle East Eye.

  • First Gaza flotilla activists arrive in Turkey after Israel deportation

    First Gaza flotilla activists arrive in Turkey after Israel deportation

    In the wake of a controversial Israeli interception of a humanitarian flotilla bound for blockaded Gaza, Israel confirmed Thursday it has finished deporting all detained foreign activists, with the first planeload of detainees touching down in Turkey to a warm welcome from supporters.

    The interception, which took place Monday in international waters, marked the latest activist effort to breach a 17-year Israeli blockade on Gaza that has tightened dramatically into a full-blown humanitarian crisis since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war in October 2023. Hundreds of participants from dozens of nations were taken into Israeli custody after the boarding operation, sparking global outrage over how detainees were treated.

    According to Turkish foreign ministry officials, 422 activists — including 85 Turkish citizens — were transported from southern Israel’s Ramon Airport to Istanbul aboard three planes chartered by the Turkish government. An AFP correspondent on the ground at Istanbul Airport reported that the first group of arriving activists exited the airport’s VIP terminal to cheers from a crowd of hundreds of supporters waving Palestinian flags. One activist addressed the gathering, defiantly stating: “We’ve been tortured, we’ve been beaten, we’ve been arrested in international waters, but we won’t give up. We will return. Palestine will be free from the river to the sea.”

    The international backlash was triggered earlier this week when far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir posted a widely condemned video showing detained activists with their hands bound and foreheads pressed to the ground, while Ben Gvir walked among them heckling detainees and waving an Israeli flag, with the caption “Welcome to Israel.” The footage drew condemnation from world capitals across Europe, North America and Oceania, and even drew criticism from within Israel’s own government: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar publicly distanced themselves from Ben Gvir’s actions, as did U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee.

    Multiple European governments have called for formal action against Israel and Ben Gvir over the incident. Italy’s Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez labeled the treatment of activists “unacceptable” and called on the European Union to impose sanctions on Ben Gvir. A leaked letter from Irish Prime Minister Micheal Martin revealed he is pushing EU leaders to take sweeping measures against Israel, including a ban on goods from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and a partial or full suspension of the EU’s association agreement with Israel. The United Kingdom also summoned Israel’s top diplomat in London to protest what officials called the “inflammatory video.”

    Legal representatives for the flotilla participants have confirmed multiple reports of abuse and mistreatment in custody. Adalah, the Israeli legal center representing detainees, reported that most activists were held at Israel’s high-security Ktziot Prison in the Negev Desert near the Gaza border, before being processed for deportation. Adalah legal director Suhad Bishara told AFP that many detainees received access to legal counsel, but others were forced to attend court hearings without legal representation. Bishara also confirmed that at least two activists were hospitalized after being hit with rubber bullets, and many other detainees reported injuries including suspected broken ribs from beatings by Israeli security forces.

    Alessandro Mantovani, an Italian journalist who was detained alongside the activists and deported earlier than the main group, described his mistreatment to reporters in Italy Thursday. “We were taken to Ben Gurion airport in handcuffs and with chains on our feet and put on a flight to Athens,” he said, adding: “They beat us up. They kicked us and punched us and shouted ‘Welcome to Israel’.”

    Activists from neighboring countries were deported over land: Egyptian detainees were transferred to the Israeli-Egyptian border crossing at Taba, while Jordanian participants were sent to the Israeli-Jordanian crossing at Aqaba.

    The latest flotilla, organized under the banner Global Sumud Flotilla, involved around 50 vessels that departed from Turkey last week, marking the second major activist attempt to break the blockade in as many months. Israel has maintained a full naval and land blockade on Gaza since 2007, when Hamas took control of the territory. Following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack that sparked the current war, the blockade has cut off almost all access to essential goods, leaving Gaza’s 2.2 million residents facing catastrophic shortages of food, clean water, medicine and fuel, with aid groups warning of widespread famine and a total collapse of Gaza’s healthcare system. Israeli officials have reiterated that they will not allow any violations of their blockade, with foreign ministry spokesman Oren Marmorstein stating Thursday: “Israel will not permit any breach of the lawful naval blockade on Gaza.”

  • Morocco launches mass deportations to block Europe migration route

    Morocco launches mass deportations to block Europe migration route

    Since mid-April 2026, Morocco has launched an expansive, ongoing deportation campaign targeting sub-Saharan African migrants seeking passage to Europe, with local sources confirming security forces are arresting more than 100 people daily as operations expand across the country’s northern region.

    Initial coordinated raids targeted informal forest encampments between Fnideq and Belyounech, a common shelter area for migrants waiting to attempt crossings to Europe, where human rights groups estimate roughly 800 people have been detained. After sweeping through this northern border zone, authorities shifted focus to large-scale operations in Tangier and its surrounding areas. Multiple witnesses and migrant advocates have documented serious abuses during the crackdown, including mass arbitrary arrests, physical beatings, racist verbal harassment, and forced transfers toward Morocco’s eastern border with Algeria.

    Deportation procedures follow a tiered pattern: detainees from Sudan and Chad are transported by bus to remote border regions and abandoned without supplies, while migrants from Senegal, Mali, Mauritania, Burkina Faso, and Guinea are put on charter flights out of Casablanca for expulsion to their home countries.

    This escalation of migration enforcement is directly tied to the European Union’s deepening border externalization strategy, a core pillar of the bloc’s incoming Pact on Migration and Asylum set to enter into force in June 2026. For years, the EU has increasingly outsourced its immigration control to North African nations with well-documented poor human rights records, allocating more than €900 million through its Global Europe development instrument to fund expanded border management, surveillance, and migration restriction initiatives across the region.

    “Essentially, this is about the EU exercising border control without getting its own hands dirty,” explained Frey Lindsay, a journalist with Statewatch’s Outsourcing Borders project, which monitors the bloc’s offshored migration enforcement. “The goal is to stop migration as far downstream along the route as possible, before anyone reaches EU territory.”

    As a key transit country for sub-Saharan African migrants heading to Europe, Morocco has steadily deepened its cooperation with Frontex, the EU’s Border and Coast Guard Agency, to block irregular departures from its northern coast. Moroccan interior ministry data shows authorities thwarted 73,640 irregular migration attempts in 2025, a small decline from 2024 that officials attribute to shifts to alternative migration routes.

    Worsening conditions for migrants in northern Morocco have been well documented by grassroots and human rights groups. Chad Boukhari, a journalist and member of Border Resistance, a Mediterranean grassroots collective supporting migrants, told Middle East Eye that migrants reported widespread mistreatment and humiliation at the hands of Moroccan security forces. “Many were abandoned near the Algerian border with no food or water, and many of those people were then detained by Algerian forces,” Boukhari said. “Witnesses told us the Algerian army tortured many detainees, and some migrants even found the bodies of other migrants left in the desert.” This pattern of cross-border abandonment and abuse is not new: in 2025 alone, Algeria expelled more than 30,000 migrants to Niger, leaving multiple deportation convoys stranded in the Sahara, with widespread accounts of torture, enslavement, and systematic abuse emerging from the region.

    Middle East Eye reached out for comment to Moroccan, Algerian, and EU authorities, but had not received a response as of publication.

    For most sub-Saharan African migrants, the journey to Morocco already involves crossing the Sahel, an arid, dangerous trans-Saharan belt, through Niger and Algeria or Mauritania. Many originate from Sahel nations gripped by chronic instability and ranked among the lowest on the United Nations’ Human Development Index, making the dangerous journey to Europe a compelling option despite the risks. After arriving in Morocco, many spend months or even years living in informal camps in the country’s dense northern forests, where humanitarian groups occasionally provide limited aid—though these efforts are often disrupted by authorities.

    Long before the current 2026 crackdown, Human Rights Watch has documented repeated, systemic abuses against migrants in Morocco dating back to 2014, including beatings by police, confiscation and destruction of personal property, burning of informal shelters, and extrajudicial expulsions without due process. Ousman Sow, a Guinean migrant who spent a year in Morocco before successfully crossing to Spain and now resides in Germany, described a pattern of coordinated monitoring of humanitarian aid efforts. “Oftentimes, the Red Cross would come to the forest and give us blankets and clothing, but we always knew that was a bad sign,” Sow said. “Shortly after those visits, Moroccan security forces would show up, like they had been tipped off or were watching. They burned all our things, then drove us to remote areas and left us there with nothing.”

    Security operations are primarily focused on blocking access to Ceuta and Melilla, two Spanish enclaves on Moroccan territory that represent the only land border between Europe and Africa. The 2022 Melilla fence tragedy, where at least 23 mostly sub-Saharan African migrants were killed under disputed circumstances while attempting to cross the border, with another 70 people still missing, has served as a grim reminder of the deadly risks of this route. Reports have since emerged that Moroccan authorities buried many of the victims in unmarked, unrecorded graves.

    Even with sharply increased enforcement, migration flows from North Africa to Europe have remained steady, driven by the ongoing war in Sudan and accelerating political and security collapse across the Sahel. For millions of displaced people, the promise of safety and opportunity in Europe still outweighs the extreme risks of the journey.

    Lindsay warns that increased securitization of borders does nothing to address the root causes of migration, and only makes the journey deadlier. “The more borders and walls you build, the more dangerous alternative routes migrants are forced to take,” she noted. “Securitization doesn’t change why people leave their homes—it just makes more people die along the way.”

    Rights advocates emphasize that the current crackdown in Morocco is a direct response to the EU’s new migration pact, which overhauls the bloc’s existing asylum system to speed up asylum case processing and deportations. The new framework expands biometric border surveillance and makes it easier to reject asylum claims on the grounds that a migrant passed through a “safe third country” before reaching the EU. Morocco is among the nations listed as safe third countries, alongside Egypt and Turkey—both of which face widespread allegations of systemic human rights abuses against migrants. Over 50 international non-governmental organizations have formally opposed the pact, arguing that its expedited procedures violate the fundamental right to a fair asylum review.

    By externalizing enforcement, the EU effectively blocks most migrants from ever reaching a point where they can file an asylum claim, shifting all operational and ethical responsibility for border control to non-EU nations. Under the EU’s Emergency Trust Fund for Africa, the bloc has already allocated hundreds of millions of euros to strengthen migration enforcement in Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya.

    The new migration pact is a high-stakes political priority for European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and her administration, which needs a legislative win to maintain political support among EU member states. “Member states have made it very clear they will not back the pact unless the European Commission does everything possible to cut arrivals and deport as many people as possible,” Lindsay explained.

    Patterns of abuse linked to EU-funded externalized border enforcement have already been well-documented in Libya, where the EU directly funds, trains, and equips Libyan coastal authorities that have been repeatedly accused of colluding with human trafficking networks to detain migrants, who are then subjected to systematic exploitation, physical and sexual violence, and enslavement. The EU is currently moving forward with plans to fund a new maritime control center in Benghazi, which is controlled by warlord Khalifa Haftar—accused of multiple war crimes by the United Nations—to intercept migrants at sea and force them back to Libya. Similar violent pushback practices have been documented along the EU’s eastern Balkans route, where Croatian border forces have repeatedly been recorded forcing migrants back into Bosnia, blocking them from accessing asylum procedures on EU territory.

    The new pact also establishes a network of “return hubs,” third countries where rejected asylum seekers can be transferred and detained while waiting for deportation—often to nations where they have no family, community, or prior connections, with proposed hubs ranging from Bangladesh to Rwanda.

    Human rights groups warn the pact reflects a broad, dangerous hardening of anti-migrant policy across EU member states that will have deadly consequences for thousands of people every year. For migrants in transit, shifting political winds in Europe directly shape their treatment in North African transit nations. As Ousman Sow put it: “Whenever the political climate changes in Europe, you can feel it in Morocco. If Europe wants immigrants, Morocco is okay. If not, it’s hostile there.”

  • ‘Why was this young life taken away?’: Protests after Dublin city death

    ‘Why was this young life taken away?’: Protests after Dublin city death

    A wave of raw grief and public outcry has swept through central Dublin after the tragic death of a young man, Yves Sakila, prompted hundreds of local residents and community activists to gather in protest and honor his memory. The incident, which unfolded in the heart of the Irish capital, has left communities reeling, with attendees gathering to question how such senseless loss of the young life has sparked demands for greater action on street safety and more transparent investigations into the circumstances surrounding his passing.

    Protesters carried placards bearing messages demanding justice, the question: “Why was this young life taken away?” became the central rallying cry of the demonstration, which brought together people from multiple local communities to stand in solidarity with Sakila’s family, who have yet to receive full clarity on social media to express their condolences, with many calling for urgent answers as Dublin’s law enforcement agencies have launched a full probe into what led to the fatal incident.

    The gathering was largely peaceful, with participants holding a moment of silence to honor Sakila’s life rather than just to protest. Community leaders speaking at the event highlighted growing concerns over urban safety in the city, which has seen a string of high-profile violent incidents in recent months, and called on national and local authorities to implement new measures to prevent more young lives from being lost to violence.

    Local law enforcement confirmed they are continuing to interview witnesses and collect evidence to establish the full sequence of events that led to Sakila’s death. As the investigation continues, the community remains united in their calls for justice and their demand for make Dublin’s streets safer for all residents.

  • Macron once campaigned for Ramy Shaath’s freedom. Now he wants to deport him

    Macron once campaigned for Ramy Shaath’s freedom. Now he wants to deport him

    In January 2022, after 900 days of detention in an Egyptian correctional facility, Ramy Shaath stepped onto French soil at Paris’ Roissy Airport. To secure his release, the Palestinian academic and long-time political organizer was forced to renounce his Egyptian citizenship, and was greeted on arrival by his French wife Celine Lebrun-Shaath and crowds of cheering supporters. The release came after intensive diplomatic pressure from then-French President Emmanuel Macron, who personally lobbied Egyptian leader Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to secure Shaath’s freedom. “I share the relief of his wife,” Macron wrote at the time. “Thank you to everyone who has played a positive role in this happy outcome.”

    Four years later, that warm welcome has curdled into a formal deportation order, framing Shaath as a “serious threat to public order” in France. On Thursday, he is scheduled to appear before an advisory deportation committee in Nanterre, the western Paris suburb where he has resided since 2022, to review the government’s attempt to remove him from the country. While the committee’s ruling is non-binding and French authorities retain the power to act regardless of its outcome, the proceedings mark the latest escalation in a months-long campaign of administrative harassment targeting the prominent activist.

    Born in the besieged Gaza Strip, Shaath argues that French and European law prohibit his deportation to any available destination. “They cannot send me back to Gaza; one, because it’s a war zone and because I am targeted by the Israelis,” he told Middle East Eye in an exclusive interview. “And in both cases, European law will not allow them to send me to Palestine. And of course, I know more Egyptians, but they cannot send me to Egypt.” While he acknowledges a remote possibility that authorities could resettle him in an unrelated third country – “so I could find myself in Liberia or Gambia” – he expects to instead be left in a permanent state of legal limbo, locked out from renewing his temporary residency, cut off from basic public services, and subjected to ongoing law enforcement surveillance.

    The foundation for the deportation push is Shaath’s decades-long open advocacy for Palestinian rights and statehood. Before his detention in Egypt, he rose to prominence as a key organizer during the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings that ousted longtime authoritarian leader Hosni Mubarak, and served as the national coordinator for the Egyptian chapter of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement targeting Israel over its occupation of Palestinian territory.

    After arriving in France in 2022, Shaath was granted an initial one-year residence visa. When he applied for renewal in September 2023, shortly after Israel launched its large-scale military campaign in Gaza following the October 7 attacks, he received no official response. He has since filed 10 urgent legal appeals for residency renewal, all of which have gone unanswered. On April 30, he received formal notice at his Nanterre home that deportation proceedings had officially been opened against him.

    Documents released by the Nanterre prefecture lay out the government’s justifications for the order, centered almost entirely on Shaath’s public comments and pro-Palestine organizing. The filing cites his long-standing connections to prominent Palestinian rights organizers in France, his public descriptions of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza as a “criminal occupation,” his open self-identification as an anti-Zionist, and his public support for a one-state solution that guarantees equal rights for all people living in historic Palestine.

    Reacting to the prefecture’s claims, Shaath expressed sarcastic disbelief. “Oh my god, are you fucking serious? The French services cracked the biggest secret of my life! For 40 years I have not had one speech that I didn’t attack Zionism, and today you cracked my heart that I’ve been lying about – that I am anti-Zionist? Unbelievable.”

    Other accusations in the filing, he says, are outright falsifications. Authorities cite one incident where he gave a “militaristic speech” while wearing military fatigues; Shaath notes that publicly available video of the event shows him sitting to deliver an academic lecture, wearing plain beige Uniqlo trousers. The filing also highlights a public comment where Shaath called on Iran to intervene to stop Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, which has killed more than 72,000 Palestinians, the vast majority of them women and children, and reduced most of the Gaza Strip to rubble. Shaath counters that he has also repeatedly called on France to deploy its military to intercept Israeli aircraft carrying out strikes on civilian targets in Gaza, a fact French officials have deliberately omitted from their filing.

    “This is a McCarthyist attack that is racist, that is criminal, that is beyond the law to harass everybody who talks about Palestine,” he said.

    Middle East Eye reached out to both the French Interior Ministry and the Nanterre prefecture for comment on the proceedings, but received no response ahead of publication.

    Shaath’s case is far from isolated. Since the start of Israel’s Gaza war in October 2023, France has joined most other Western European nations in rolling out a widespread crackdown on pro-Palestine advocacy and protest. The crackdown has been particularly acute on university campuses, where student organizers, faculty, and labor unions have repeatedly warned of growing punitive pressure on anyone expressing public support for Palestinian rights. Peaceful demonstrations, public lectures, and campus occupations have been reclassified as illegal public disorder, leading to disciplinary proceedings, administrative fines, criminal charges, and in dozens of cases, permanent criminal records for participants.

    Last month, the French parliament was scheduled to debate a controversial new bill that would introduce a range of new criminal penalties for public criticism of Israel, including criminalization of denials of Israel’s right to exist and criminal sanctions for public comparisons of Israeli policy to Nazi Germany. While the bill was ultimately pulled from the parliamentary calendar amid procedural disputes, the Macron administration has confirmed it intends to reintroduce identical legislation this summer. The proposed text would also expand the definition of terrorism-related offenses to include “implicit provocation,” a vague standard that legal experts warn would enable widespread crackdowns on anti-war and pro-Palestine speech.

    Unlike many grassroots Palestinian rights organizers, Shaath comes from a prominent Palestinian political background: he is the son of Nabil Shaath, a former Palestinian Authority prime minister and chief Palestinian negotiator, previously served as an advisor to iconic PLO leader Yasser Arafat, was a member of the Palestinian Authority’s official negotiation team with Israel, and has even been invited to deliver formal addresses to the French Senate and Foreign Ministry. Nanterre, his home city, named him an honorary citizen in 2021, before his release from Egyptian prison. None of these credentials have shielded him from the sweeping new crackdown on pro-Palestine speech.

    In response to the deportation order, Shaath’s family, friends, and supporters announced a new public campaign last Sunday to block his removal, under the hashtag #FreeRamyShaath2. The name references the first international campaign that secured Shaath’s release from Egyptian prison between 2019 and 2022, when he was charged with “aiding a terrorist group in achieving its goals.” Crucially, the first campaign enjoyed formal support from the French political establishment; the second is a direct challenge to that same establishment’s current crackdown on Palestinian advocacy.

    This is not the first time French authorities have targeted Shaath over his pro-Palestine speech. In November 2023, Laurent Nunez, then the prefect of Paris and now the French Interior Minister, referred Shaath to the French justice system on charges of “apology for terrorism,” based on a rally speech where he stated that “the Palestinian people, like all people under occupation, have the right to defend themselves and resist.” The case was ultimately dismissed by Paris prosecutors 11 months after it was opened.

    Shaath, who explicitly says he opposes all forms of violence and racism, including antisemitism, argues that even when the baseless charges are thrown out, the administrative process itself is a form of punishment designed to force him to end his activism or leave the country voluntarily. “Yes, of course, if they continue this draconian decision against me and put me under house arrest… I will fight it, but I’m not going to spend my life in that condition. Eventually, probably, that might lead me to leave,” he said.

    The deportation notice already includes a provision that would place Shaath under house arrest ahead of any final ruling, restrict his movement to his home municipality of Nanterre, and require him to check in “morning and evening” at the local police station. Shaath says he intends to exhaust every available legal avenue to fight the order, including taking his case to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary.

    “I will not live under intimidation. If they insisted on being a banana republic, I will insist on taking the legal route,” he said. “They want to keep me, to stop talking about Gaza and Palestine. I’m not going to do that.”

  • Man jailed for fatal Boxing Day hit-and-run

    Man jailed for fatal Boxing Day hit-and-run

    A tragic hit-and-run collision near Blanchardstown Shopping Centre in west Dublin, Republic of Ireland, has claimed the lives of a married couple, leading to a five-year prison sentence for the 46-year-old driver responsible. John Halpin, a resident of Whitestown Avenue in Blanchardstown, entered guilty pleas to three counts: dangerous driving resulting in the deaths of Anthony Hogg, 39, and Georgina Hogg Moore, 38, failing to stop after the crash, and fleeing the accident scene despite knowing he had caused serious injury to multiple people.

    Halpin’s partner, 35-year-old Nicole Fallon, who shares the same address, also pleaded guilty to the charge of impeding Halpin’s arrest by law enforcement. In handing down her sentence, Judge Martin Nolan issued a three-year suspended sentence, ruling that the court must take into account the severe impact that imprisoning Fallon would have on the four children she shares with Halpin, according to reporting from Irish national broadcaster RTÉ.

    The couple’s 17-year-old daughter, Becky Joy Hogg, who was walking alongside her parents at the time of the December 26, 2024 crash, delivered a harrowing victim impact statement to the court. She recalled that her parents had been heading out for a rare evening date, while she was planning to meet friends in the same general direction. The trio decided to walk together, with Becky walking ahead of her parents, who she described as looking visibly happy and content in that moment.

    Becky told the court she heard her mother’s scream before she fully processed what was happening, when the vehicle struck the crossing. She turned to see her father lying on the concrete, bleeding severely from his injuries. Initially, she thought the screaming she heard next came from her mother, but quickly realized both of her parents had been struck by the car. Georgina was dragged underneath the vehicle and was pronounced dead at the scene of the crash, while Anthony later passed away from his injuries while receiving treatment at hospital. Becky herself suffered non-fatal injuries to her hip and ankle in the collision.

    Detective Alan Murphy told the court that the three family members were crossing the road at a marked pedestrian crossing when the light for pedestrians was green, confirming they had the right of way. Witnesses who saw the crash recalled hearing the screech of car tyres, and observed the vehicle speeding away from the scene immediately, with no skid marks left on the road to indicate Halpin had attempted to emergency brake before impact.

    Forensic specialists who investigated the crash determined that Halpin had been driving at approximately 85 kilometers per hour (around 52 miles per hour) in an area with a posted speed limit of 60 kilometers per hour (37 miles per hour), meaning he was traveling well above the legal speed limit when the collision occurred.

    When Irish police (known locally as gardaí) first attended the address where Halpin’s car was registered, they were met by Fallon, who told officers she had no idea where Halpin was and claimed he had not returned home all day. Investigators later learned that Halpin had in fact fled back to the house immediately after the crash, and Fallon quickly moved his car to a different nearby housing estate, along with hiding Halpin’s jacket and two mobile phones to obstruct the investigation.

    Halpin eventually turned himself in to gardaí later that same night. During questioning, he told investigators he could not explain his actions or why he chose to leave the scene. The court heard that at the time of the crash, Halpin and Fallon’s eight-month-old infant was being treated in hospital, and the couple had been taking turns staying with the baby at the medical facility. Halpin told gardaí he was returning from the hospital that evening, and claimed he was exhausted from the stressful situation, and had not seen the green pedestrian crossing light. He told officers he might have been adjusting the radio or air conditioning controls when the crash happened.

    Tests confirmed Halpin was not intoxicated at the time of the crash, and no evidence was found to indicate he was using his mobile phone while driving. The court was also told that Halpin has a total of 33 previous criminal convictions, including charges for drug possession and multiple prior road traffic offenses, including previous convictions for drink driving and driving without valid insurance.

    In his sentencing remarks, Judge Nolan noted that all drivers recognize that accidental mistakes can happen behind the wheel, but courts are required to weigh aggravating factors when determining appropriate sentences for fatal collisions. The judge confirmed that Halpin did not intend to kill the couple, but emphasized that he should have seen the crossing pedestrians. The road was straight, the area was fully lit by streetlights, and the Hoggs had a clear green pedestrian signal to cross.

    Judge Nolan identified Halpin’s excessive speed and his decision to flee the scene, when he must have known he had hit people, as key aggravating factors in the case. For Fallon, the judge confirmed that her actions of lying to gardaí and moving Halpin’s vehicle to hide evidence clearly impeded the official investigation into the fatal crash.

  • Looting and destruction are Israeli army’s ‘primary mission’ in Lebanon, soldiers say

    Looting and destruction are Israeli army’s ‘primary mission’ in Lebanon, soldiers say

    Fresh firsthand accounts from serving Israeli military reservists have laid bare systemic widespread looting and deliberate destruction of civilian property by Israeli troops operating in southern Lebanon, according to a new investigation published Wednesday by Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz. One reservist, who spoke to the outlet on condition of anonymity, laid out the consistent pattern of operations his unit followed: after opening fire on residential homes to clear any suspected Hezbollah fighters and confirm the area was secure, the unofficial, and in many cases primary, mission of stealing civilian property would begin. The reservist described that stolen goods ranging from fine rugs and upholstered armchairs to motorbikes and household heaters were pulled from private homes, while local shops were completely stripped of high-value merchandise. Even basic supplies used at Israeli military outposts in the region, including hand soap, were stolen from Lebanese properties, he added. Stolen spoils were stockpiled at forward outposts to be carried back to Israel when soldiers completed their tours of duty, and troops frequently argued over who would claim the most valuable items. This new account comes amid a growing tide of public reports of large-scale looting that have emerged since Israel-Hezbollah fighting escalated in March, following the joint Israeli-U.S. military strike on Iran. The issue of rampant theft by Israeli troops is not new: just one month prior, Haaretz first reported that soldiers had stolen sofas, televisions, and motorbikes from southern Lebanese households, with senior army commanders largely ignoring the practice. Earlier this month, Israeli outlet Ynet also reported that top military leaders have been unable to curb the scale of the looting across southern Lebanon. In comments made to senior commanders at a military conference last month, Israeli Army Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir publicly condemned the practice, stating, “the phenomenon of looting, if it exists, is disgraceful and could stain the entire military.” He added, “If such incidents occurred, we will investigate them. I am not willing for us to become an army of looters.” Following Zamir’s remarks, Israeli broadcaster Channel 14 reported that the chief of staff had asked frontline commanders operating in Lebanon to sign a public letter pledging to crack down on looting. However, at least one senior commander refused to sign, telling the outlet that discipline problems within the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) originate at the highest ranks of command. The reservist who spoke to Haaretz echoed this assessment, saying most senior commanders openly tolerated the looting. “The attitude was that there was no problem with looting as long as you didn’t get hurt. The higher command didn’t really try to stop us either,” he said. After initial reports of looting broke last month, the reservist said his own commanding officer ordered troops to halt theft – before entering local shops himself and smashing any remaining valuables so soldiers would have nothing left to steal. To date, no IDF soldiers have faced formal disciplinary action or punishment for participating in looting, the reservist confirmed. He added that some troops have even tried to justify the theft on religious grounds, while others argue that since most civilian properties were already slated for destruction, there was no reason to leave valuables intact. The reservist compared the IDF’s current approach to that of a historical Viking army, saying leadership allows widespread looting as a way to keep troops satisfied and willing to continue fighting. Israeli historian Adam Raz, who has extensively researched the looting of Palestinian property during the 1948 Nakba, noted last month that looting has been a consistent feature of every Israeli military campaign in the region. “What’s new is the total indifference,” Raz said. “The senior command turns a blind eye, the criminality continues, and the crime achieves its goals.” The findings from Haaretz’s latest investigation align with findings from international human rights groups. Last month, the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said on-the-ground reports from southern Lebanon confirm a clear, organized pattern of theft during Israeli military operations. The group documented that Israeli forces regularly raid civilian homes, rummage through personal belongings, and steal cash and private property, adding that the practice has become an official, unstated policy of the Israeli state and military. Euro-Med has also documented identical patterns of looting by Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip and the occupied West Bank. In a separate incident from January, Israeli forces were reported to have stolen roughly 250 goats from Syrian territory and transferred the animals to Israeli settlement outposts in the occupied West Bank. Even after the United States-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah was announced last month, cross-border clashes and military operations have continued uninterrupted. Data from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) shows that roughly 100,000 Lebanese civilians have fled their homes in recent weeks out of fear of incoming Israeli strikes. Official figures from the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health confirm that Israeli forces have killed at least 3,020 people since the latest military offensive began in March, including 824 civilian and combatant deaths that have occurred since the April 17 ceasefire was announced. For its part, Hezbollah has killed at least 21 Israeli soldiers since March, eight of whom have died since the ceasefire, the majority of them invading troops stationed inside Lebanese territory. The new Haaretz testimonies also reveal that targeting Hezbollah fighters was not always the primary mission for Israeli troops on the ground. A second reservist told the outlet that the IDF’s core objective in southern Lebanon is not countering militant activity, but the deliberate destruction of civilian homes. “There was no reason other than revenge,” the reservist stated. He described a pre-invasion speech delivered by a battalion commander as “a pagan ritual”, adding that he had heard identical inflammatory rhetoric during previous Israeli military campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon. “When we entered the village, there were no militants. The houses were empty,” he said. “There was no fighting there at all – only operations to flatten homes.” The reservist noted that this destructive mission has been the IDF’s core focus in the region for the past two years, joking that the Israel Defense Forces should be renamed the “Israel Defence Forces for house demolitions”. He confirmed that even in areas with no sign of militant activity, soldiers still entered empty civilian homes to search for valuables to steal. According to his account, residential homes, public schools, and local clinics are destroyed without any formal military justification. Much of the demolition work is carried out by private contractors, including extreme Israeli settlers, as well as Bedouin and Druze laborers. For religiously observant soldiers in his unit, the reservist added, destroying Lebanese civilian homes is viewed as a sacred, ultimate mission. He also recounted that whenever troops raised the prospect of returning to Israeli territory, the battalion commander would respond: “This is Israel too.”

  • Walmart warns US shoppers are cutting spending as higher gas prices bite

    Walmart warns US shoppers are cutting spending as higher gas prices bite

    The ripple effects of the ongoing Iran conflict are now creating tangible financial strain for American households, and one of the nation’s largest retail giants is sounding the alarm over shifting consumer spending habits. Walmart, the biggest private employer in the United States and a bellwether for national consumer trends, has confirmed that skyrocketing gasoline prices are prompting shoppers to pull back on discretionary purchases across other categories of its business.

    The Middle Eastern conflict has triggered a sharp jump in global wholesale oil prices, which has directly translated to higher pump costs for drivers across the U.S. Fresh data from the American Automobile Association (AAA) underscores just how dramatic the increase has been: since the war began, the national average price for a gallon of regular gasoline has surged from $3 per gallon to $4.56.

    In comments made to CNBC, Walmart Chief Financial Officer John David Rainey explained that earlier this year, the financial pressure of rising living costs was partially buffered by larger-than-usual tax refunds stemming from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), the tax cut legislation signed under former President Donald Trump. But that temporary relief is now fading, and Rainey warned that consumers will begin to feel the full weight of elevated fuel costs in the current April-to-July financial quarter.

    “ Higher tax returns muted some of the pressure related to higher fuel prices, and as we’re in a period of time right now where those tax refunds are largely not coming in, I think consumers are going to feel more of that pressure from higher fuel prices,” Rainey told CNBC. The CFO added that Walmart is monitoring pump prices closely, and current projections indicate that elevated costs will persist through the coming months.

    Beyond non-essential spending, Rainey also flagged a more serious risk to grocery prices during a call with investors. If the ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz continues, key agricultural inputs including fertilizer, nitrogen and phosphates could face supply chain disruptions and shortages, which would force Walmart to raise prices on food staples for consumers.

    Despite the grim forward guidance, Walmart’s first quarter financial results (covering February through April) tell a different story. The retailer reported a net profit of $5.3 billion for the quarter, representing an 18.8% year-over-year increase, while total quarterly sales climbed 7.3% to hit $177.8 billion. That strong growth trajectory is not expected to hold, however: Walmart projects that sales growth will slow to a range of 4% to 5% between May and July, as broad inflation and rising fuel costs cut into household purchasing power.

    Investors reacted quickly to the downbeat forecast, pulling Walmart’s share price down by 7% in Thursday morning trading. As a key indicator of broader consumer health, the retailer’s warning has also raised new concerns across the U.S. retail sector about the impact of geopolitical conflict on domestic economic stability.