作者: admin

  • Mateta fires Palace to Conference League glory in Glasner farewell

    Mateta fires Palace to Conference League glory in Glasner farewell

    In a historic night of European football at Leipzig’s Red Bull Arena, Crystal Palace claimed the first major European trophy in the club’s 120-year history with a tense 1-0 victory over Spain’s Rayo Vallecano in the 2025 UEFA Conference League final, powered by Jean-Philippe Mateta’s second-half match-winner.

    The opening 45 minutes delivered a tightly contested, cagey affair, with both sides trading half-chances but failing to break the deadlock. Rayo Vallecano, who entered the final on a nine-match unbeaten run and entered the tie as underdog overachievers, carved out the first clear opportunity of the game in the 25th minute, when midfielder Alemao saw his low driven effort flash just wide of the Palace goalpost. Moments before halftime, the London side squandered a golden opening: Adam Wharton, who passed a late fitness test to start just hours after battling an ankle injury, floated a pinpoint cross over the Rayo defense that found Tyrick Mitchell unmarked at the back post, only for the full-back’s header to drift inches wide of the target.

    The game sprang to life six minutes into the second half, as Crystal Palace found their rhythm and converted the breakthrough. Wharton unleashed a powerful strike from the edge of the 18-yard box that Rayo goalkeeper Augusto Batalla got both hands to, but could only parry the rebound straight into the path of Mateta. The French striker reacted instantly, tapping the loose ball into the empty net to put his side ahead, and send departing manager Oliver Glasner into his final match in charge with the lead.

    Palace came tantalizingly close to doubling their advantage shortly after, when Yeremy Pino’s curling free-kick crashed against both the crossbar and the post before ricocheting off a Rayo defender and hitting the woodwork a third time. Rayo somehow cleared the ball off the line to keep the scoreline at 1-0, and the Spanish side rarely threatened an equalizer after that, with Palace’s defense holding firm to see out the win.

    The result caps an extraordinary two-and-a-half year reign for Glasner, who departs the club having secured three trophies in two seasons — the most successful run in Crystal Palace’s history. After leading the club to a breakthrough FA Cup win last year and a Community Shield victory at the start of this campaign, the Austrian tactician adds the Conference League title to his collection, having already lifted the Europa League with Eintracht Frankfurt back in 2022, cementing his reputation as a knockout competition specialist.

    The triumph is all the more remarkable given the off-season and mid-season upheaval Palace navigated this term. The club sold star players Eberechi Eze and Marc Guehi, the latter to Manchester City in January, and was originally set to compete in the Europa League this season before being demoted to the Conference League due to UEFA multi-club ownership regulations. Even Mateta, the hero of the final, came close to leaving the club in the winter transfer window, collapsing a move to AC Milan only after a failed medical.

    Speaking after the final whistle, midfielder Adam Wharton, whose late fitness boost proved pivotal for Palace, hailed Glasner’s transformative impact on the club. “The difference he has made in two and a half years is incredible,” Wharton told TNT Sports. “Three trophies, the first European trophy in the history of the club. He’s got to be one of the best managers Palace have ever had, and he’s completely changed how we approach cup competitions — now we go into every one expecting to win.”

    Mateta, who put in a tireless shift up front for Palace, echoed his teammate’s excitement: “I feel fantastic. First time we’ve competed in Europe, and we did it! I’m tired, I gave everything out there, the whole team gave everything, and that’s why we’re champions tonight. Right now I just want to celebrate with the lads.”

    Palace’s win makes them the third consecutive London-based Premier League club to lift the Conference League trophy, following West Ham United in 2024 and Chelsea in 2025, a run that underscores the unmatched financial depth of the English top flight across European competition. With Aston Villa already crowned Europa League champions this term, the Premier League is on the cusp of a historic clean sweep of all three major UEFA club trophies, with league champions Arsenal set to face Paris Saint-Germain in the Champions League final this Saturday.

  • ‘Trump’ buffalo spared sacrifice, sent to Bangladesh zoo

    ‘Trump’ buffalo spared sacrifice, sent to Bangladesh zoo

    In a last-minute twist that has captured public attention across Bangladesh, a rare albino bull buffalo, widely nicknamed ‘Donald Trump’ for its striking golden blond coat that resembles the former U.S. president’s signature hairstyle, has been saved from ritual slaughter ahead of Eid al-Adha and will now live out its life under professional care at the South Asian nation’s national zoo.

    Bangladesh, a Muslim-majority country home to 170 million people, prepares to mark Eid al-Adha — the global Islamic Festival of Sacrifice — on Thursday. For generations, the holiday has centered on the ritual slaughter of livestock, with meat distributed to family, friends, and low-income communities. This year, an estimated 12 million animals including goats, sheep, cattle and buffalo are expected to be sacrificed across the country, giving many disadvantaged households a rare opportunity to enjoy meat during the festive celebrations.

    The 700-kilogram (1,500-pound) rare albino bull was originally purchased by a local trader ahead of the holiday, slated for slaughter like thousands of other livestock across the nation. But weeks before the event, the animal went viral on local social media platforms, drawing widespread attention for its unique pale complexion and distinct light-colored mane. Crowds of curious onlookers, social media content creators, and local families flocked to the small farm in Keraniganj, on the outskirts of Dhaka, just to catch a glimpse of the rare animal and snap photos with the unexpected viral star.

    The buffalo’s original owner, 38-year-old Zia Uddin Mridha, told reporters that his brother first came up with the nickname ‘Trump’ because of the bull’s unusual flowing light hair. Mridha added that in the weeks leading up to Eid, his property saw a nonstop stream of visitors eager to see the rare buffalo.

    Even with the growing attention, Mridha completed the sale of the bull ahead of the holiday, as is common for livestock owners ahead of Eid al-Adha. But just hours before the animal was set to be slaughtered, Bangladeshi authorities intervened to spare its life. Local police were dispatched to seize the buffalo from the new owner, following an official order from the national government to protect the rare animal.

    ‘Livestock department officials requested that we take possession of the buffalo because it is a rare genetic specimen,’ Mohammad Ruhul Quddus, officer-in-charge of Keraniganj Police Station, confirmed to Agence France-Presse. ‘They noted the albino buffalo is still young, and can be cared for and bred for research and conservation over the next several years.’

    After being taken into government custody, the buffalo was transferred to Bangladesh’s National Zoo in Dhaka, where zoo officials have already prepared dedicated accommodations for the new resident. Atiqur Rahman, curator of the National Zoo, told reporters on Wednesday that the facility has set aside a private shed for the albino buffalo, assigned a full-time dedicated caregiver, and implemented a mandatory two-week quarantine to ensure the animal is healthy before it is displayed to the public.

    ‘We will make sure he gets the best possible care here,’ Rahman said. Since the news of the buffalo’s rescue broke, local media reports indicate that zoo attendance has already seen a small boost, with many locals saying they plan to visit to see the viral animal once it goes on public display.

  • Ex-US government official arrested after $40 million in gold bars found in home

    Ex-US government official arrested after $40 million in gold bars found in home

    A high-stakes corruption probe has ended in the arrest of a recently retired top Central Intelligence Agency official, who authorities say hoarded more than $40 million in stolen government gold bars at his private residence in Virginia. Federal Bureau of Investigation agents confirmed they seized 303 one-kilogram gold bars, roughly $2 million in untraceable U.S. cash, and 35 high-end luxury watches—most manufactured by Rolex—during a May 18 search warrant execution at former official David Rush’s home.

    Court filings lay out the timeline of the alleged scheme: Between November 2025 and March 2026, Rush repeatedly submitted formal requests to the U.S. government, claiming the millions of dollars in gold and large amounts of foreign currency were needed to cover confidential work-related expenditures. Once the assets were released to him, internal CIA auditors were unable to track any of the gold or significant portions of the currency, and found no documentation showing how Rush had used the assets for official agency business.

    According to reporting from *The New York Times*, Rush held a senior leadership role at the CIA until very recently, and maintained top-secret security clearance with full access to the agency’s most sensitive classified information. Beyond the theft of public funds, the former executive faces additional charges: court documents accuse Rush of falsifying his educational background and military service record during his initial government job application, and of improperly collecting thousands of dollars in pay while fraudulently claiming authorized military leave.

    The investigation traces back to an internal ethics probe by the CIA itself. In an official written statement, the FBI confirmed that CIA Director John Ratcliffe personally referred the case to federal law enforcement after the agency’s internal review flagged potential criminal violations. FBI agents moved to arrest Rush on May 19, and he remains in federal detention ahead of his first court hearing scheduled for this week. His legal counsel has declined to provide any statement on the charges to reporters. As of press time, court documents have not offered clarification on what Rush intended to do with the cached assets, and the BBC has confirmed it has not yet received a response to its request for additional comment from the CIA.

  • AP Exclusive: Trump administration tells prosecutors to stand down on Venezuela leader, sources say

    AP Exclusive: Trump administration tells prosecutors to stand down on Venezuela leader, sources say

    In a development that highlights the Trump administration’s shifting diplomatic approach toward oil-rich Venezuela, multiple current and former U.S. law enforcement officials have confirmed that the White House has quietly ordered federal prosecutors based in Miami to halt active criminal investigations into Venezuelan acting President Delcy Rodríguez, a figure who has been on the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s watchlist for nearly a decade. This decision marks the most recent step in a rapid thaw of relations between Washington and Caracas following the ouster of former Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

    It remains uncertain whether prosecutors had gathered enough evidence to implicate Rodríguez in any criminal activity, or whether law enforcement teams were on the verge of issuing a formal indictment against her. A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Justice claimed in an emailed statement that “there was never an investigation into her to shut down.” However, DEA records obtained earlier this year by The Associated Press confirm that Rodríguez has repeatedly appeared on federal law enforcement’s radar since at least 2018. Unlike a number of other high-ranking Venezuelan government officials, she has never been formally criminally charged in U.S. courts to date.

    Multiple officials familiar with the internal directive said the order to suspend investigations into Rodríguez was intentionally crafted to avoid disrupting the administration’s broader efforts to stabilize Venezuela in the wake of Maduro’s capture. It is still unclear whether the White House, which directed all inquiries about the decision to the Department of Justice, directly intervened to order the probes paused. “Everybody has been told to stand down,” one unnamed former senior law enforcement official told the AP. All sources who shared details of the internal deliberations spoke on condition of anonymity, as they were not cleared to publicly discuss confidential law enforcement and policy matters. Requests for comment from Rodríguez, her U.S. legal representative, and Venezuela’s Communications Ministry went unanswered.

    By removing the lingering threat of a potential indictment, even on a temporary basis, the U.S. has significantly reduced diplomatic and legal pressure on Rodríguez as the Trump administration works with the acting president to rebuild stability in Venezuela and open the country’s energy sector to American investment. Shortly after U.S. military forces transported Maduro and his wife to New York to face federal narcotics charges — both have pleaded not guilty — former President Donald Trump publicly praised Rodríguez as a “terrific person.”

    In recent months, the U.S. has lifted all sweeping sanctions that were imposed on Rodríguez during Trump’s first term, formally recognized her as Venezuela’s legitimate head of state, and cleared the way for her administration to re-establish working relationships with Western financial institutions. This shift has also cleared a path for U.S. energy firms to pursue access to Venezuela’s proven petroleum reserves, the largest on the planet. As bilateral ties deepen, some foreign policy analysts have pointed to the U.S.’s Venezuela strategy — which combines oil blockades, criminal indictments of incumbent leaders, and implicit military threats to force internal regime change — as a potential blueprint for pressure campaigns against other long-standing U.S. adversaries, including Iran and Cuba.

    During Trump’s first term, Rodríguez and her brother Jorge Rodríguez, who currently leads Venezuela’s National Assembly, were sanctioned for their role in what the U.S. described as undermining Venezuelan democracy and entrenching Maduro’s authoritarian government. Despite that history, Trump publicly praised Rodríguez’s leadership in a social media post from early March, writing: “The Oil is beginning to flow, and the professionalism and dedication between both Countries is a very nice thing to see!” In recent weeks, Rodríguez has welcomed multiple high-profile delegations of American energy executives to Caracas, including groups led by U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum.

    Notably missing from the growing diplomatic goodwill between the two governments is any public commitment from Rodríguez to hold long-promised democratic elections. Last month, Rodríguez exceeded a 90-day temporary mandate to hold office that was set by Venezuela’s high court after Maduro’s ouster. When a visiting U.S. journalist asked her earlier this month for a specific timeline to schedule elections, she replied only: “Some time.”

    Top Democratic lawmakers have openly criticized the administration’s softening approach to Rodríguez. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has demanded the administration publicly explain its favorable treatment of Rodríguez, calling her a “central figure in Nicolás Maduro’s repressive regime.” Shaheen, joined by Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, sent a formal letter last week to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, noting that “Sanctions have been lifted on Ms. Rodríguez without any indication that she has taken concrete and meaningful actions to restore democratic order.”

    Rick de la Torre, former CIA chief of station in Caracas and current CEO of the geopolitical advisory firm Tower Strategy, said the decision to shield Rodríguez from prosecution aligns cleanly with the Trump administration’s core foreign policy priorities in Venezuela. “She’s a lifelong Marxist and was a senior leader of one of the world’s most corrupt regimes but the U.S. is providing her with breathing space and carrots to lay the foundation for democracy and U.S. investment,” de la Torre explained. He added, “There’s a shelf life to her utility, however. At some point she will face justice.”

    As the AP previously reported, the DEA has built a detailed intelligence file on Rodríguez stretching back to at least 2018, with allegations against her ranging from large-scale drug trafficking to illegal gold smuggling. According to DEA records, a confidential informant told agency investigators in early 2021 that Rodríguez used hotels on the Caribbean Venezuelan resort of Isla Margarita as a front to launder proceeds from illegal activity. Her name has been connected to roughly a dozen separate DEA investigations spread across field offices from Paraguay, Ecuador, Phoenix and New York, with several of those probes still active earlier this year. Records also link Rodríguez to Alex Saab, a Colombian-Venezuelan businessman alleged to be Maduro’s chief bag man, who was first arrested by U.S. authorities in 2020 on money laundering charges. Just this month, Rodríguez ordered Saab deported as part of a broader purge of insider business figures accused of enriching themselves through corrupt deals with the former Maduro regime.

    It remains unclear which specific active investigations in Miami included Rodríguez’s name, though two former officials confirmed she has also been discussed in meetings among investigators in Tampa, who were tasked last year by former Attorney General Pam Bondi with probing financial corruption linked to Venezuela. At the time the investigations began, Rodríguez was serving as Maduro’s vice president. Under long-standing Department of Justice policy, the attorney general must personally approve any criminal charges against a sitting foreign head of state, who generally enjoy broad immunity from prosecution under both international law and U.S. domestic law.

    The pause in investigations into Rodríguez is not an isolated case: the Trump administration has also hit the brakes on ongoing federal probes into another high-profile Latin American leftist leader, Colombian President Gustavo Petro. The DEA had previously designated Petro a “priority target” over alleged ties to drug trafficking organizations, with federal prosecutors conducting a months-long investigation into the claims. The New York Times reported in March that U.S. officials have privately assured the Colombian government that Petro will not face criminal charges in connection with the probe.

    Duncan Levin, a former federal prosecutor who previously served in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, said that ordering law enforcement to stand down from a legitimate investigation for political or diplomatic reasons would be “deeply troubling.” “The White House cannot use criminal enforcement as a diplomatic light switch,” Levin told the AP. “DOJ decisions are supposed to be based on law, evidence, policy and public safety — not on whether a foreign official is useful to the administration at a given moment.”

    This report was contributed to by Durkin Richer from Washington, Mustian from New York, and Regina Garcia Cano from Mexico City, as part of an ongoing investigation tied to the FRONTLINE documentary *Crisis in Venezuela*, which premiered on PBS on February 10, 2026.

  • Bolivia at ‘breaking point’, president warns protesters

    Bolivia at ‘breaking point’, president warns protesters

    Bolivia has entered its fourth week of widespread anti-government demonstrations, with President Rodrigo Paz warning Wednesday that the Andean nation has reached a critical “breaking point” as blockades have choked off supplies of food, fuel, and life-saving medical resources to the country’s political capital La Paz.

    Six months into his term, the US-backed center-right leader took office during Bolivia’s most severe economic downturn in 40 years. Now he faces a growing wave of public anger rooted in policy disagreements, led by low-income workers and members of Bolivia’s Indigenous majority — the nation’s largest demographic group — who have gathered in La Paz demanding his immediate resignation.

    Speaking at a public gathering in the capital Wednesday, the 58-year-old president reiterated his call for negotiation while stressing the urgent need for social order. “The country needs order, and is reaching breaking point,” Paz stated. The previous day, Bolivia’s Congress removed legislative barriers that would prevent the president from declaring a national state of emergency, clearing the way for a potential military deployment to clear blockades and restore calm.

    To date, Paz has framed dialogue as his preferred path forward, but has refused to rule out activating what he calls “constitutional instruments” to end the ongoing siege of La Paz — a clear reference to emergency powers. “Anyone who wants to destroy the nation will have to deal with this president and the full force of the Constitution,” he added, confirming that police and military forces enjoy full public and government backing for their efforts to maintain order.

    Paz’s warnings coincided with a high-profile Mother’s Day march in La Paz, where thousands of Indigenous women in traditional layered skirts took to the streets to back striking transport workers and amplify the call for the president’s ouster. “We are not afraid to die. We have already told him to pack his bags and leave,” protest organizer Marta Poma Luque told Agence France-Presse in an on-the-ground interview.

    The unrest first erupted in early May, when demonstrators initially called for higher wages to offset the impact of the deep economic crisis, more reliable fuel distribution, and the full repeal of a deeply unpopular agrarian reform law. Though Paz has already backed down on several key demands, including rolling back parts of the land reform, demonstrations have expanded into a full-scale movement against his administration.

    Over the past two weeks, La Paz has descended into repeated conflict, with riot police clashing regularly with thousands of blockading protesters. The blockades have cut off all major supply routes into the city, leaving residents facing acute shortages of critical goods. Local resident Zulm Hinojosa, whose 13-year-old son lives with chronic asthma and heart conditions, told reporters that essential medication has become exponentially more expensive and in many cases has run out entirely.

    At Clinicas de La Paz, one of the country’s oldest and largest public medical facilities, medical staff confirmed Tuesday the hospital only has enough oxygen to sustain patients for a few more days. For his part, Paz has calculated total economic losses from the weeks of unrest at roughly $600 million.

    In a bid to defuse tensions, the president has already announced a series of concessions: he pledged to halve his own presidential salary as a gesture of solidarity with low-income Bolivians, a largely symbolic move given his monthly salary of just 24,000 bolivianos (approximately $3,500). He has also promised greater policy input for Indigenous groups and labor unions, and dismissed his widely unpopular labor minister. None of these steps have managed to end the protests.

    Paz’s administration has accused former president Evo Morales of secretly orchestrating the nationwide unrest. Morales is currently in hiding, facing criminal charges related to the alleged trafficking of a teenage girl with whom prosecutors claim he fathered a child.

    In response to the crippling blockades, small groups of La Paz residents have held counter-demonstrations in recent days calling for an end to the supply disruptions that have turned daily life in the capital into a crisis.

  • Why Fifa is being investigated over World Cup ticket prices

    Why Fifa is being investigated over World Cup ticket prices

    Global soccer governing body Fifa is now under official scrutiny from regulators in New York and New Jersey, following widespread claims that fans were deliberately misled during World Cup ticket sales processes. The investigation, which was recently launched, centers on growing consumer complaints that ticket buyers received inaccurate information about both pricing structures and exact seat locations when purchasing spots for the upcoming 2026 FIFA World Cup, co-hosted across multiple North American cities including matches scheduled in New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium.

    Authorities in both U.S. states have confirmed they are examining whether Fifa violated local consumer protection laws through the disputed sales practices. Multiple fans have come forward to report that what was advertised as premium-priced seating turned out to be located in far worse positions than marketed, with some customers paying thousands of dollars for tickets that offered obstructed views of the pitch, far worse than what was promised during the sales process. These allegations have sparked widespread outrage among soccer supporters who had saved for months or even years to secure tickets for the world’s biggest sporting event.

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup, the first to expand to 48 teams, has already faced high levels of public scrutiny over soaring ticket prices that have put match attendance out of reach for many casual fans. The addition of this consumer fraud investigation adds another layer of controversy to the tournament, which is set to kick off in June 2026 across 16 host cities in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. As of now, Fifa has not issued an official public response to the launch of the investigation, and regulators have not announced a timeline for how long the probe is expected to take.

  • Israel kills chief of Hamas armed wing in Gaza strike

    Israel kills chief of Hamas armed wing in Gaza strike

    In a targeted strike that has further escalated tensions amid a fragile current ceasefire, Israel announced Wednesday that it has killed Mohammed Odeh, the newly appointed leader of Hamas’s Ezzedine Al-Qassam Brigades, the armed wing of the Palestinian militant group. Odeh’s assassination marks the fourth time Israel has eliminated the top commander of the Brigades since the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, underscoring Israel’s sustained campaign to decapitate Hamas’s leadership structure.

    Odeh was appointed to the role just weeks earlier, following the Israeli killing of his predecessor Ezzedine al-Haddad on May 15. The confirmation of his death came in a joint statement from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Shin Bet domestic security agency, which noted Odeh was killed in a strike on Tuesday. Hamas later publicly confirmed Odeh’s death, referring to him as a martyred leader of the Palestinian resistance in a defiant statement that condemned the attack as a “cowardly assassination.”

    The strike did not end with Odeh: the entire family was killed in the attack, including his wife and three children — two adult sons and a minor daughter. The assassination took place during Eid al-Adha, one of the most important religious holidays in the Muslim calendar. Bassem Abu Odeh, a cousin of the deceased leader, told Agence France-Presse (AFP) that Odeh and his family had been making preparations to celebrate the holiday when Israeli missiles struck their location. “They were ready to welcome Eid, but instead the criminal Zionists welcomed and targeted them with missiles,” he said.

    On Wednesday, hundreds of mourners gathered in Gaza City for Odeh’s funeral. An AFP journalist on the ground reported that an AK-47 rifle was placed atop Odeh’s casket as the procession carried his body to a local mosque for traditional funerary prayers before burial.

    Prior to taking command of the Brigades, Odeh served for years as the head of Hamas’s intelligence division and was one of the highest-ranking remaining Hamas leaders still operating in the Gaza Strip. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz reacted to the killing with characteristic belligerence, writing on social media platform X that Odeh had been “sent to meet his associates in the depths of hell.”

    The strike on Odeh came hours before the IDF announced another targeted operation in northern Gaza Wednesday evening, saying it had hit two senior Hamas operatives, identified by Israeli media as a brigade commander and his deputy. Local rescue officials from Gaza’s Hamas-run civil defence agency reported that the central Gaza City strike left 10 people dead and multiple others wounded, with a medical source confirming five children were among the fatalities.

    Odeh’s assassination is the latest in a years-long, systematic Israeli campaign to eliminate top Hamas figures across the region, launched in response to Hamas’s October 7, 2023 cross-border attack that triggered the current war. Israel has already killed a long list of senior Hamas leadership in recent months: former political chief Ismail Haniyeh, Yahya Sinwar — widely labeled the mastermind of the October 7 attack — longtime armed wing commander Mohammed Deif, and Mohammed Sinwar, who succeeded his brother Yahya as Hamas’s Gaza leader, have all been killed in Israeli strikes.

    In his social media statement, Katz reaffirmed Israel’s commitment to eliminating all Hamas leaders responsible for the October 7 attack. “We committed ourselves to eliminating everyone who led the October 7 massacre, and that is what we will do: they are all marked for death, wherever they may be,” he wrote. IDF Arabic spokeswoman Lieutenant Colonel Ella Waweya echoed that messaging, joking that the position of Ezzedine Al-Qassam Brigades commander “has become the shortest-lived job in Gaza.” She added, “The question is no longer who’s next — but how long they have left.”

    Katz also reiterated Israel’s core war goal of dismantling Hamas’s rule over Gaza, and alluded to a controversial Israeli plan to push for the forced displacement of Gaza’s civilian population. “The plan for voluntary migration from Gaza will also be implemented — everything will be done at the right time and in the right way,” he said. The displacement proposal is heavily backed by far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, and gained brief support from former U.S. President Donald Trump before he walked back the position. The United Nations’ top human rights official, High Commissioner Volker Turk, condemned such plans in February, denouncing proposals “aimed at making a permanent demographic change in Gaza.”

    Hezbollah, the Lebanese armed group and key Hamas ally, released a statement of condolence following Odeh’s killing, dismissing Israeli efforts to break Palestinian resistance through leadership decapitation. “All Israeli attempts to undermine this resistance by targeting its leadership and fighters will end in failure,” the group said.

    Despite a formal ceasefire that has been in place since October 10, daily violent incidents continue to rock the Gaza Strip, with both sides repeatedly accusing one another of truce violations. Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry, whose casualty figures are deemed reliable by the United Nations, reports that more than 900 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli military action since the ceasefire went into effect. Israel currently maintains full military control over roughly 60 percent of the Gaza Strip, including all border entry and exit points, while the vast majority of Gaza’s civilian population is confined to a narrow coastal strip.

  • Legal bid to block UK-backed French migrant detention centre

    Legal bid to block UK-backed French migrant detention centre

    A looming legal appeal against a UK-supported migrant detention centre near Dunkirk has emerged as a major threat to a landmark £660 million bilateral agreement aimed at curbing illegal small boat crossings across the English Channel. The ongoing legal challenge, brought by a French environmental advocacy group, casts uncertainty over the timeline of the facility’s opening — a key prerequisite for the UK to release its pledged funding for the project.

    The 140-bed detention centre in Loon-Plage, currently under construction and targeted for operational launch by the end of 2026, was first greenlit by French interior authorities in July 2025. Within months, local environmental group Association pour la Défense de l’Environnement du Littoral Flandre-Artois (ADELFA) contested the construction permit, arguing the facility breached multiple local and national regulations. After an initial challenge was dismissed, the group escalated the case to the Administrative Court of Lille in February 2026, opening the current appeal process.

    ADELFA’s legal arguments center on four core claims: first, the site falls within an industrial zoning district where permanent residential accommodation is prohibited under local planning rules, and the detention centre qualifies as residential use; second, the facility sits in close proximity to industrial sites including an ammonia-cooled warehouse, creating unacceptable public health hazards for detainees; third, the interior ministry failed to comply with mandatory fire safety consultation requirements; and fourth, the ministry neglected to post the approved building permit in a publicly visible location as required by French law.

    While the appeal is not automatically suspensive, meaning construction work can continue throughout the legal process, legal experts warn a ruling in favor of ADELFA could result in the permit being revoked — and in the most severe scenario, require the partial or full demolition of the completed facility. Even an unsuccessful challenge, however, would almost certainly delay the centre’s opening, a common outcome for legal disputes over migrant detention infrastructure in France.

    This facility is a central pillar of the new bilateral migration deal signed by UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and French Interior Minister Laurent Nunez last month, which expands on a 2023 agreement struck between the UK’s former Conservative government and France. Under the terms of the new £660m arrangement, the UK has set aside £160m in dedicated funding directly tied to measurable results in reducing Channel crossings, with payment for the detention centre explicitly conditional on the facility opening and delivering proven outcomes within its first year of operation. If the centre fails to meet performance benchmarks, or does not open as scheduled, the UK has confirmed the allocated funding will be withdrawn.

    For UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the France agreement is a core policy response to mounting political pressure to reduce the persistent flow of small boat crossings that have become a defining political issue in recent years. Once operational, the new centre will house migrants intercepted while attempting to reach the UK, before they are deported to their countries of origin or EU member states they previously transited. The facility will prioritize deportations of migrants from the 10 most common origin countries for 2025 crossings: Eritrea, Afghanistan, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Iraq, Syria, Vietnam and Yemen. A pilot of the new detention and deportation model is already set to launch this month at an existing removal centre in nearby Coquelles, while construction of the permanent facility is completed.

    ADELFA president Nicolas Fournier said the group acknowledges a favorable ruling is not guaranteed, but remains committed to disrupting the project through the legal process. Fournier argued that the current approach of increasing law enforcement and detention capacity — what he described as overinvestment in repressive measures — has repeatedly failed to curb crossings, and that policymakers must pursue alternative, more humane solutions to address the risks migrants face when attempting the dangerous sea crossing.

    French legal experts have offered differing perspectives on the appeal’s potential outcome. Francois Benchendikh, a senior public law lecturer at Sciences Po Lille, noted the court’s central debate will revolve around whether the detention centre qualifies as residential accommodation under zoning rules, and that the nearby ammonia storage facility could be enough to justify annulling the permit. By contrast, Paris-based urban planning lawyer Alice Darson said the facility should be classified as a public service facility, which would exempt it from the residential zoning ban, though failure to properly consult fire safety officials could still lead to the permit being canceled.

    Migration policy analyst Dr. Mihnea Cuibus, a researcher at the UK’s Migration Observatory, noted that even if the centre opens on schedule, there are significant structural barriers to scaling up deportation operations from the facility, and that the project’s success will likely remain a contentious sticking point in bilateral relations between London and Paris. As of this reporting, the French government has not responded to requests for comment on the ongoing legal challenge, and has not released public figures for the total construction and operational costs of the facility. A recent report from the French Senate, however, estimated that a standard 140-bed migrant detention centre costs roughly €40 million (£36 million) to build. A UK government spokesperson reaffirmed that France remains committed to completing the project, and that the UK will only release funding once construction is finalized.

  • How my brother went from liberal Hollywood actor to manosphere ‘messiah’

    How my brother went from liberal Hollywood actor to manosphere ‘messiah’

    A year-long investigation by BBC World Service has uncovered a sharp, underdocumented surge in the popularity of misogynistic manosphere content across the Global South, tracing how algorithmic amplification, financial incentives, and shifting gender dynamics have turned once-marginalized anti-feminist rhetoric into a mainstream, lucrative industry. At the center of the trend is Luis Castilleja, a former aspiring Hollywood actor who now goes by the alias El Temach—Latin America’s largest manosphere creator, boasting more than 11 million followers across social platforms and an annual income from content alone that tops $1.5 million.

    A decade ago, Castilleja was a free-spirited creative living a liberal lifestyle in Los Angeles, pursuing work as a performer after studying theater in Mexico City. But after struggling to land consistent roles and experiencing a painful breakup, he returned to Mexico and launched a social media channel in 2020 focused on male self-development. According to his sister Alex Castilleja, a Mexico-based design engineer, his early mission was rooted in good intentions: he wanted to help other young men process feelings of inadequacy and disappointment after life setbacks. That initial purpose quickly warped, however, as Castilleja realized the viral and financial potential of content that blamed women for men’s struggles.

    Alex, who has not spoken to her brother in two years, says Castilleja openly admitted he was copying the playbook of Western manosphere figurehead Andrew Tate, whose controversial content had already gone viral globally. As algorithmic engagement rewarded increasingly extreme rhetoric, Castilleja doubled down on misogynistic talking points: he attacks single mothers as poor life choices, labels women who reject traditional gender roles as promiscuous unfit partners, and frames feminism as a movement that erases men’s legitimate struggles. Alex says her brother now suffers from a “Messiah complex,” convinced he is the sole figure who can fix modern men’s issues, and that much of his extreme rhetoric is tailored purely to game social media algorithms. “He believes some things – and others, he’s just experimenting what works best with the algorithm,” she told the BBC, describing his transformation as shocking and tragic, turning a once-close sibling relationship toxic.

    El Temach is far from an isolated case. The BBC investigation analyzed 15 leading manosphere influencers based across Latin America, South and East Asia, and Africa, finding that their combined follower counts have tripled on average over the past three years. In Kenya, for example, influencer Andrew Kibe has become a household name, attracting more than 500 million views across hashtags linked to his content, with a fanbase of young men hungry for messaging about male empowerment. Like El Temach, Kibe repeatedly labels women gold diggers, attacks single mothers, and frames gender equality progress as discrimination against men.

    Both influencers deny their content is misogynistic. El Temach initially agreed to participate in the BBC documentary before pulling out last minute, launching a profanity-laced rant against the outlet on a live YouTube stream. When confronted by reporters after his sold-out Las Vegas show, his security blocked access. His team has called the BBC’s estimates of his income “highly irresponsible” and categorically denied allegations that he promotes misogyny, calling the claims unfounded and out of context. Kibe went further, disputing the very existence of misogyny as a concept, telling the BBC: “No man hates a woman. We love you – we are like gods to you, worship us.”

    Experts say the rapid growth of manosphere content in the Global South is directly tied to recent, rapid gains in gender equality across these regions. As more women enter higher education, the workforce, and positions of leadership, a subset of young men feel disenfranchised and invisible, a gap manosphere influencers have been quick to exploit. A 2025 global survey from King’s College London of more than 23,000 adults found that 57% of Gen Z men agree with the statement: “We have gone so far in promoting women’s equality that we are discriminating against men.” That belief is the foundational tenet of nearly all leading manosphere creators’ messaging.

    “He focuses a lot on men as having been dismissed by society, and [the narrative that] women have, you know, been the stars of the show,” explained Dr. Ali Siles, a gender and masculinities researcher at the National Autonomous University of Mexico. “He has this message of: ‘You do matter, believe in yourself.’” For many young men who feel abandoned by traditional support systems, that message resonates. The BBC gained full access to the multi-year social media histories of two Gen Z followers—19-year-old Mexican Julian, and Kenyan university student Ryan—to trace how users drift into manosphere content. Julian, who first started engaging with fitness and car content at 16, encountered El Temach via Instagram’s recommendation algorithm within months; today, he has liked more than 3,000 videos from manosphere creators, and says he believes “feminism has made men’s problems invisible.” Ryan, raised by a single mother, turned to Kibe’s content while searching for guidance on masculinity and success from a father figure, calling the influencer a surrogate for the parental guidance he lacked.

    But that validation of men’s struggles comes at a steep cost, researchers warn: it is built on the dehumanization and subjugation of women, rolling back decades of progress toward gender equality by pushing women back into restrictive, stereotypical roles. The investigation found real-world harm linked to this content, including intimate partner abuse. Fernanda, a doctor based in Mexico City, told the BBC her ex-partner—also a doctor—used El Temach’s messaging to justify years of controlling behavior. On the day they separated, she says he locked her in a room and forced her to watch four hours of El Temach’s videos, telling her she was the one at fault for their relationship problems, before threatening to kill her. “I think [my former partner] was already a sexist who was hiding it. But El Temach influenced him to no longer feel bad about it,” she said.

    For Alex Castilleja, her brother’s rise is a personal and public warning: it shows how the allure of fame and fortune can push even the most unlikely people into promoting harmful rhetoric that damages lives. “I think he knows what he’s doing on some level. I think that he sees and realises that if he ever owns up to what he did, it’ll destroy him,” she said. “He drifted… into this weird dystopic hell and he’s just this… violence robot. It’s very sad.”

  • Ravindra and Blundell hit centuries as NZ and Ireland meet for 1st time in a test match

    Ravindra and Blundell hit centuries as NZ and Ireland meet for 1st time in a test match

    In a groundbreaking moment for cricket between two longtime cricketing nations, New Zealand staged a remarkable comeback on the first day of its maiden test match against Ireland in Belfast on Wednesday, powered by back-to-back centuries from Rachin Ravindra and Tom Blundell that lifted the Black Caps to a dominant 361 for five wickets by the close of play. The historic one-off four-day fixture at Belfast’s Civil Service Cricket Club got off to a dream start for the Irish side, after captain tossed the coin correctly and opted to put New Zealand into bat first to exploit early pitch conditions. Irish pace bowler Mark Adair turned this opening advantage into an immediate breakthrough, dismissing New Zealand skipper Tom Latham for a duck off just the second ball of the entire match. Adair followed that up with a second early wicket, removing Devon Conway for just four runs, leaving the Black Caps reeling early in their innings. By the time the fourth wicket fell, New Zealand had struggled to 86 runs on the board, leaving the match perfectly poised for an Irish fightback. That was when Ravindra and Blundell joined forces to turn the tide of the game completely in New Zealand’s favor. The pair forged a match-defining 217-run partnership that silenced the Irish bowling attack and rebuilt the innings from its shaky start. Ravindra’s impressive knock of 121 runs finally came to an end when he was caught off the spin bowling of Harry Tector, by which point New Zealand had moved to 303 for five wickets. Blundell remained unbeaten at the close of play on 142 not out, anchoring the innings and carrying New Zealand to its imposing final total heading into the second day. Beyond this historic fixture, the match serves as critical preparation for New Zealand ahead of their upcoming high-profile three-test series against England, which is scheduled to get underway on June 4 at the iconic Lord’s Cricket Ground in London. Wednesday’s opening day delivered a dramatic display of cricketing resilience, proving that even with an early setback, top-tier batting can turn a match on its head in test cricket.