作者: admin

  • Algerians struggle to afford Ramadan feasts as prices rise despite government pledges

    Algerians struggle to afford Ramadan feasts as prices rise despite government pledges

    ALGIERS, Algeria — The sacred month of Ramadan, traditionally marked by spiritual reflection and communal feasting, has become a period of financial anxiety for many Algerians grappling with severe economic pressures. Despite Algeria’s substantial oil and gas reserves, declining purchasing power has pushed numerous families below the poverty line, transforming what should be a time of celebration into one of calculation and sacrifice.

    At Algiers’ bustling Clauzel market, the commercial epicenter of the capital, stalls overflow with vibrant fruits and vegetables artfully displayed. Yet beneath this appearance of abundance lies a harsh reality: essential food items have experienced dramatic price surges. Onions doubled from 45 to 100 dinars (approximately $0.35 to $0.77) per kilogram within days, while carrots reached 150 dinars, peppers 200 dinars, and green beans an astonishing 550 dinars per kilogram.

    The situation has created tense confrontations between vendors and consumers, with occasional eruptions of violence in marketplaces. Ahmed Messai, a retired railway worker, reflects on the stark contrast: “In the 1970s, we didn’t earn much, but we could stock up for Ramadan and afford fresh meat, fruit, and vegetables.”

    President Abdelmadjid Tebboune’s administration has attempted to address the crisis through measures including the importation of 144,000 sheep and 46,000 cattle to improve meat accessibility. However, even with government intervention, locally sourced mutton from the High Plateaus and cattle from the Kabyle mountains remain prohibitively expensive for middle-income professionals.

    The growing economic distress has catalyzed a remarkable solidarity movement. Restaurant owners across the country have converted their establishments into “mercy restaurants” serving free meals to those in need. The Algerian Red Crescent operates one of the largest such initiatives in Algiers, serving up to 800 meals daily in a massive tented community space.

    Academic Hocine Zairar notes that while these efforts demonstrate “solidarity and civic awareness,” their proliferation signals a troubling societal shift: “Poverty is gaining ground in our country.” Indeed, mercy restaurants—once frequented primarily by singles, homeless individuals, and travelers—now regularly serve entire families.

    President Tebboune acknowledged the profound economic transformation during a recent television interview, stating that “the middle class, once the pride of Algeria, is now being decimated by the crisis.” His administration has promised wage increases, raised the minimum wage from 20,000 to 24,000 dinars, and increased retirement pensions by 5-10%.

    According to Professor Redouane Boudjema of the Institute of Journalism in Algiers, these Ramadan assistance measures represent a governmental effort to maintain “social peace” and mitigate political discontent arising from restrictions on civil and trade union freedoms. With the average Algerian salary equivalent to approximately $330 officially (and less than $235 on the informal market), the economic challenges extend far beyond the holy month, threatening the nation’s social fabric.

  • World leaders react cautiously to US and Israeli strikes and death of Iran leader Ali Khamenei

    World leaders react cautiously to US and Israeli strikes and death of Iran leader Ali Khamenei

    BRUSSELS (AP) — The international community responded with measured apprehension this weekend following coordinated military strikes by the United States and Israel against Iranian targets, an operation that reportedly resulted in the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and triggered immediate regional retaliation.

    Unverified reports from multiple sources indicate the 86-year-old Iranian leader may have been killed during strikes on his compound early Saturday. U.S. President Donald Trump declared on social media that Khamenei’s apparent demise presented “the single greatest chance for the Iranian people to take back their Country.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu subsequently acknowledged “growing signs” supporting these claims, though Iranian state media offered only minimal confirmation without detailing circumstances.

    The potential loss of Iran’s second revolutionary leader—who had not publicly designated a successor—casts immediate uncertainty over the Islamic Republic’s political future while dramatically heightening concerns about broader regional conflict. In response to the escalating situation, the U.N. Security Council convened an emergency session to address the crisis.

    Global reactions revealed a complex diplomatic landscape. European powers including Britain, France, and Germany issued joint statements condemning Iranian retaliatory strikes while carefully avoiding explicit endorsement of the U.S.-Israeli operation. French President Emmanuel Macron emphasized that France was “neither warned nor involved” in the military action, advocating instead for intensified diplomatic efforts.

    The Arab League denounced Iranian counterstrikes as “a blatant violation of the sovereignty of countries that advocate for peace,” though historically critical of both Iranian and Israeli policies. Several Arab states, including Morocco, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates, specifically criticized Tehran’s attacks on U.S. bases throughout the region.

    Russia and China delivered more direct criticisms, with Moscow’s Foreign Ministry labeling the strikes “a pre-planned and unprovoked act of armed aggression” and Beijing calling for immediate cessation of military actions. Conversely, Canada and Australia expressed open support for the operation, with Canadian leadership describing Iran as “the principal source of instability and terror throughout the Middle East.”

    Regional observers noted palpable tension across conflict zones. In the West Bank, Palestinians continued daily life despite audible missile interceptions, while authorities prepared for potential supply disruptions. Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide voiced concerns about the “failure of negotiations” potentially leading to “a new, extensive war in the Middle East.”

    The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons issued a stern warning that the attacks “risk provoking further escalation as well as increasing the danger of nuclear proliferation.” EU leadership and the Arab League jointly appealed for de-escalation and a return to diplomatic channels to prevent further regional destabilization.

  • AFL 2026: Carlton defender Jacob Weitering is closing in on a swift return from injury

    AFL 2026: Carlton defender Jacob Weitering is closing in on a swift return from injury

    Carlton Football Club is maintaining a guarded yet hopeful stance regarding the fitness of vice-captain Jacob Weitering, with his availability for the highly anticipated Opening Round clash against Sydney hanging in the balance. The key defender suffered a significant setback last month, sustaining a broken rib during the revived State of Origin event, casting immediate doubt on his participation in the season’s commencement.

    Despite the severity of the injury, club sources indicate Weitering has remained firmly within selection calculations. Teammate George Hewett provided insight into the cautious optimism permeating the club, stating the defender must successfully navigate this week’s training sessions to be considered. “He’s got to get through this week,” Hewett emphasized. “We hope he’s a good chance, but he’s got to train today and we play Thursday, so (train again on) Tuesday, and hopefully he’s right to go. He’s been doing as much as he can… he looks in good shape.”

    The potential absence of Weitering would deliver a substantial tactical blow to Carlton’s defensive structure, particularly in their mission to contain former teammate Charlie Curnow. The star forward sought a move to Sydney at the conclusion of last season, setting the stage for a compelling narrative in Thursday’s encounter.

    Hewett, who himself transitioned between these two clubs in 2021, downplayed any extra motivation in facing a former teammate. “(We’re) just going to treat it like another game,” he remarked. “He’s in a different team now, he was a great servant at this club, but things move on quickly. Six months ago, some players in the AFL wouldn’t have thought they’d be at certain clubs, and it happens, so you’ve just got to move on very quickly.”

    The midfielder emphasized focus on fundamental responsibilities rather than personal narratives, adding: “I think if you worry about that, you’re not worrying about the ball and your role, so once the ball bounces, you get pretty fixated on what you need to do. It’s going to be an exciting game and it will be good for the viewers to watch, which is cool.”

  • At least 23 protesters killed in Pakistan after killing of Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

    At least 23 protesters killed in Pakistan after killing of Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

    Pakistan witnessed a day of widespread violence and civil unrest on Sunday as mass protests erupted in response to the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a reported US-Israeli operation. The demonstrations turned deadly across multiple cities, resulting in at least 23 confirmed fatalities and numerous injuries.

    In Karachi, the nation’s commercial capital, hundreds of protesters stormed the US consulate complex, with several managing to breach the outer perimeter and inflict damage on the main building’s windows. The confrontation turned lethal as security forces employed live ammunition, tear gas, and rubber bullets against the crowds. According to Sindh’s chief police surgeon Sumaiyya Syed, at least ten individuals lost their lives in Karachi alone, with approximately 60 others sustaining injuries.

    The capital city Islamabad became another focal point of violence, where thousands gathered to express outrage over Khamenei’s death. At least two protesters were killed during demonstrations near the heavily fortified “Red Zone” that houses parliament buildings and diplomatic compounds, including the US embassy.

    The mountainous northern region of Gilgit-Baltistan emerged as a particularly violent flashpoint, with eleven fatalities reported in the city of Skardu. Protesters set fire to the office of the United Nations Military Observer Group, prompting authorities to impose a three-day curfew in the area.

    The widespread unrest stems from Pakistan’s significant Shia Muslim population, which constitutes approximately 20 percent of the country’s 200 million inhabitants. Many Pakistani Shias regarded Khamenei as their spiritual leader and regularly undertake pilgrimages to holy sites in Iran.

    In response to the security crisis, the US embassy in Islamabad announced the cancellation of all visa appointments and consular services for American citizens. Embassy officials advised US nationals in Pakistan to monitor local news, avoid large gatherings, and ensure their registration with the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP) remained current.

    Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi addressed the nation, acknowledging the shared grief with Iran while urging citizens to “not take the law into their hands” and protest peacefully. The government has condemned what it characterized as “unwarranted attacks” against Iran, noting that these developments occurred amid ongoing diplomatic efforts to achieve peaceful solutions in the region.

    The violence highlights Pakistan’s delicate geopolitical position, caught between its western neighbor Iran and its historical allies in the Gulf region. This balancing act became particularly complex following Pakistan’s recent mutual defense agreement with Saudi Arabia, which commits both nations to treat aggression against one as aggression against both.

  • Trump’s bet on Iranian regime change could be his biggest gamble yet

    Trump’s bet on Iranian regime change could be his biggest gamble yet

    In a dramatic escalation of Middle East tensions, President Donald Trump has authorized joint US-Israel military strikes against Iran, resulting in the death of the regime’s Supreme Leader. Dubbed Operation Epic Fury by Pentagon officials, this unprecedented action represents Trump’s bold attempt to achieve what previous administrations failed to accomplish: the complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program and potential regime change through aerial power alone.

    The operation unfolded after the White House issued ultimatums demanding Iran abandon its nuclear weapons program, cease ballistic missile production, and withdraw support for proxy groups including Hamas and Hezbollah. President Trump monitored the strikes in real-time from his Mar-a-Lago estate while advisors convened in the White House Situation Room.

    This military campaign marks a significant departure from Trump’s previous non-interventionist stance and campaign promises to end ‘forever wars.’ The administration now faces critical questions about long-term strategy and potential regional blowback. Military experts warn that eliminating Iran’s leadership without ground forces could spark a broader regional conflict, particularly given Iran’s retaliatory strikes against US allies including Bahrain, UAE, and Qatar.

    Domestically, the operation has triggered sharp political divisions. While Republican leadership largely supports the action, Democratic leaders condemn what they characterize as an unauthorized war of choice. House Democrats are preparing measures to constrain presidential war powers, setting the stage for a contentious political battle as midterm elections approach.

    The administration’s unconventional approach to foreign policy faces its ultimate test as Iran vows aggressive retaliation. With global energy markets watching nervously and the potential for prolonged conflict looming, Trump’s gamble could either redefine Middle East geopolitics or plunge the region into unprecedented instability.

  • Explosion, gunfire as Afghan forces shoot at aircraft over Kabul

    Explosion, gunfire as Afghan forces shoot at aircraft over Kabul

    Kabul was thrust into a state of high alert on Sunday as the sound of explosions and sustained anti-aircraft gunfire echoed through the city center. According to reports from AFP journalists on the ground, the Taliban-led government confirmed its forces were engaging Pakistani aircraft in a significant escalation of ongoing border hostilities.

    The current crisis represents a dangerous intensification of cross-border tensions that have been building for months. The situation deteriorated dramatically on Thursday when Afghan forces initiated an offensive along the contentious frontier, prompting Pakistan to respond with both ground operations and aerial bombardments.

    Taliban government spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid stated Sunday that “anti-aircraft fire is being directed at Pakistani aircraft in Kabul,” confirming the defensive measures being taken in the capital. Pakistan has acknowledged conducting bombing campaigns on Friday targeting key Afghan cities including Kabul and Kandahar—the latter being home to Afghanistan’s supreme leader.

    Civilian casualties have become a central point of contention in the conflict. Afghan authorities have accused Pakistan of killing non-combatants in multiple attacks, allegations that Islamabad has not directly addressed. In rural southern Kandahar, construction workers reported being hit by two airstrikes on Sunday, with site managers confirming three fatalities.

    “Everything went dark before our eyes,” recounted 20-year-old Enamullah, who provided only one name. “I came from Kabul just to earn a piece of bread.”

    According to Afghan government deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat, Pakistani fire has killed 30 civilians across eastern Khost, Kunar, and Paktika provinces since Thursday, in addition to those killed in Kandahar. These casualty figures, like many claims from both sides, remain difficult to verify independently.

    The conflict has expanded beyond aerial engagements. An AFP journalist in Jalalabad reported hearing a jet and two explosions on Saturday, with Afghan security forces claiming they downed a Pakistani fighter jet and captured its pilot—an assertion Islamabad dismissed as “totally untrue.”

    Diplomatic efforts to secure a ceasefire have thus far proven unsuccessful. Saudi Arabia and Qatar have engaged in mediation attempts, while China has stated it is “working with” both countries and called for calm. The United States has expressed support for “Pakistan’s right to defend itself against Taliban attacks,” according to Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Allison Hooker.

    The fundamental dispute centers on Pakistan’s accusation that Afghanistan has failed to act against militant groups conducting attacks within Pakistani territory—a charge the Taliban government rejects. Many recent assaults have been claimed by Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a militant group that has intensified operations since the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021.

    Analysts note that this week’s escalation marks a strategic shift, with Pakistan focusing airstrikes on Afghan government facilities rather than solely targeting militant positions as in previous operations.

    Pakistan’s information minister reported that 37 locations across Afghanistan had been hit by airstrikes since operations began, while Islamabad earlier stated that 12 of its soldiers had been killed. Meanwhile, Afghan officials claim to have killed more than 80 Pakistani soldiers and captured 27 military posts.

    The defense ministry in Kabul has also asserted it conducted air strikes on Pakistani territory over the past two days, which observers believe may have been drone operations.

    With Islamabad declaring “open war” on Friday and the Afghan government calling for “dialogue,” the current violence represents the worst outbreak since October fighting that killed more than 70 people on both sides. Land borders between the neighboring nations have remained largely closed since that time, further complicating the humanitarian and diplomatic situation.

  • Bowen: A dangerous moment, but US and Israel see opportunity not to be missed

    Bowen: A dangerous moment, but US and Israel see opportunity not to be missed

    Tehran has been plunged into crisis following a massive coordinated airstrike by United States and Israeli forces that resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The attack, described by Israel as ‘pre-emptive,’ represents the largest aerial operation in Israeli Air Force history according to military officials.

    Security footage from Tehran shows chaotic scenes with smoke rising over residential neighborhoods as emergency services respond to the strikes. The operation appears calculated rather than reactive, with both nations judging Iran vulnerable due to economic crises, damaged defenses from last summer’s conflict, and internal unrest following brutal crackdowns on protesters.

    This military action delivers another blow to international law frameworks, as both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu justified the strikes under self-defense principles despite the enormous power disparity between their nations and Iran. Netanyahu, facing domestic elections, has consistently viewed Iran as Israel’s primary security threat, while Trump’s objectives have shifted from previously declaring Iran’s nuclear program ‘obliterated’ to now emphasizing nuclear ambitions as justification.

    The political calculus appears to include hopes for regime change, with both leaders addressing the Iranian people directly about ‘freedom’ and overthrow opportunities. Historical precedents in Iraq and Libya suggest such outcomes remain highly uncertain and likely to produce catastrophic collateral damage including state collapse and prolonged civil conflict.

    Iran’s complex political structure, maintained through ideological commitment, corruption, and ruthless security enforcement, suggests the regime will persist despite leadership decapitation. The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) remains positioned to install a new clerical leader, unlikely to be swayed by Trump’s offers of immunity given the cultural significance of martyrdom in Shia ideology.

    Regional powers including Saudi Arabia face heightened instability as this conflict threatens to export violence across the Middle East and beyond. The deliberate targeting of Khamenei demonstrates a belief in assassination as strategy, though dealing with a state rather than militant movement creates fundamentally different challenges than previous operations against Hamas or Hezbollah leadership.

    With trust obliterated following the US withdrawal from the JCPOA nuclear agreement and recent demands for missile program restrictions, diplomatic solutions appear remote. Iran’s remaining leadership now calculates survival strategies while the world confronts the unpredictable consequences of escalated conflict in an already volatile region.

  • Why did the US attack Iran? Is the US at war? Here’s what to know

    Why did the US attack Iran? Is the US at war? Here’s what to know

    In a dramatic escalation of Middle East tensions, the United States and Israel initiated joint military operations against Iranian targets early Saturday. The coordinated offensive, designated “Epic Fury” by US forces and “Lion’s Roar” by Israel, represents the most significant military confrontation between the nations in decades.

    President Donald Trump utilized social media to announce the operations, simultaneously declaring the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, whom he characterized as “one of the most evil people in History.” Iranian state media subsequently confirmed the passing of the 86-year-old leader and declared a 40-day mourning period. Intelligence sources indicate approximately 40 Iranian officials perished in the strikes, with satellite imagery revealing substantial damage to Khamenei’s compound in Tehran.

    The military action follows the collapse of nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran just two days prior. President Trump justified the offensive by citing Iran’s nuclear ambitions, historical grievances including the 1979 hostage crisis and 1983 Beirut barracks bombing, and what he described as an “unending campaign of bloodshed” targeting American interests.

    Iranian forces launched immediate retaliatory strikes throughout the Middle East, with projectiles targeting US military installations in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the UAE. Iranian Foreign Minister condemned the initial attack as “unprovoked and illegal.”

    Domestic reaction in the United States fractured along partisan lines. Congressional Republicans largely endorsed the operation, with Senator Lindsey Graham declaring it “necessary and long justified.” Democrats denounced the unilateral action, with Senator Tim Kaine labeling the conflict “Trump’s illegal war” and renewing calls for war powers legislation.

    Current US military presence in the region includes two aircraft carrier groups and approximately 30,000-40,000 troops distributed across 13 bases, though officials indicate no immediate plans for ground troop deployment in Iran. Casualty reports indicate over 200 fatalities and 700 injuries within Iran, with additional casualties reported in Israel and the UAE. President Trump warned that military operations would likely continue throughout the coming week.

  • Will Oscars be 17th time lucky for songwriter Diane Warren?

    Will Oscars be 17th time lucky for songwriter Diane Warren?

    After an unprecedented 17 nominations spanning nearly four decades, legendary songwriter Diane Warren stands on the precipice of potentially claiming her first competitive Academy Award. The 68-year-old music icon, recognized for penning timeless hits like Aerosmith’s “I Don’t Want to Miss a Thing” and Celine Dion’s “Because You Loved Me,” has become a perennial Oscars fixture despite never securing the golden statuette.

    This year’s nomination carries profound personal significance for Warren. Her nominated composition, “Dear Me,” serves as an emotional letter of empowerment to her childhood self. Featured in the documentary “Diane Warren: Relentless,” the Kesha-performed ballad directly addresses Warren’s experiences with childhood bullying and isolation. “This is my most personal song I’ve ever done for a movie,” Warren revealed, describing how music provided salvation during her difficult youth.

    The Grammy-winning songwriter conceptualized the piece as a therapeutic message to her younger self, assuring that life would eventually improve despite contemporary hardships. With characteristic humor, Warren added that she envisioned telling her bullied younger self that “you’re going to go back to your reunion, they’re going to look really old, you’re going to still look good, too.”

    Despite holding the record for most Oscar nominations without a win, Warren maintains philosophical perspective about the recognition. She emphasizes that selection by the Academy’s music branch—comprising esteemed composers, songwriters, and music editors—already constitutes victory among hundreds of contenders.

    Warren faces competition from Nicholas Pike’s “Sweet Dreams of Joy” from the opera documentary “Viva Verdi!,” alongside entries from “KPop Demon Hunters,” “Train Dreams,” and “Sinners.” Pike, a first-time nominee, echoed Warren’s sentiment that nomination itself represents extraordinary achievement, remarking that “everyone is a winner” among the distinguished finalists.

    The 98th Academy Awards ceremony on March 15 will determine whether Warren’s 17th attempt finally yields that transformative victory, potentially crowning one of American music’s most influential careers with its missing ultimate accolade.

  • ‘Dubai’s nightmare’: Iranian strikes shatter calm of UAE business hub

    ‘Dubai’s nightmare’: Iranian strikes shatter calm of UAE business hub

    Dubai’s carefully cultivated image as a secure haven in the turbulent Middle East faced an unprecedented challenge on Saturday as Iranian missiles and drones targeted the emirate. The assault, launched in retaliation for a surprise US-Israeli operation, sent billowing smoke and flames across the skyline of the region’s premier business and entertainment capital.

    The attack carries profound implications beyond immediate geopolitical tensions. Dubai has emerged as the world’s foremost beneficiary of post-pandemic economic trends, attracting London bankers, American finance professionals, and global entrepreneurs with its low-tax environment and efficient bureaucracy. The city-state’s property market has soared by 75% since 2020, while its financial institutions have become magnets for diverse capital flows—from Sudanese militia leaders trading gold to Eastern European expatriates fleeing conflict.

    Symbolic footage of an Iranian drone striking the luxurious Fairmont Hotel on Palm Jumeirah circulated rapidly through expatriate communities, challenging the fundamental calculation that built modern Dubai. The evacuation of the Burj Khalifa—the world’s tallest building—and indefinite flight suspensions at Al Maktoum International Airport further underscored the city’s vulnerability.

    Regional analysts note that Dubai’s essence depended on being a safe oasis in a troubled region. The attacks demonstrate that no amount of economic success can fully insulate the emirate from the Middle East’s unpredictable politics. This development potentially reprices risk assessments for the wealthy global citizens who have fueled Dubai’s boom, with competitors like Doha, Riyadh, and Muscat waiting to offer alternatives.

    The strikes have unexpectedly unified Gulf Cooperation Council leaders, with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman expressing solidarity with Emirati leadership. Iran’s broader calculation appears to be forcing regional monarchs to either support US military operations or pressure Washington to de-escalate tensions—particularly if economic hubs continue suffering collateral damage.