作者: admin

  • French lawmakers set to push bill criminalising speech on Israel

    French lawmakers set to push bill criminalising speech on Israel

    A deeply divisive bill that would impose sweeping new criminal penalties on a wide range of speech related to Israel is currently moving through France’s national parliament, triggering fierce public backlash and reigniting long-simmering debates over the boundaries of political expression in the country.

    The legislation, scheduled for its first reading in the National Assembly on April 16, has already earned unusual cross-party support, with backing even from far-right political factions. But the broad political consensus behind the bill has not quelled public opposition: more than 500,000 people have signed a public petition demanding the legislation be scrapped, and organized protests against the measure have spread across multiple French cities as critics warn it poses an unprecedented threat to core free speech protections.

    The proposal is the brainchild of sitting French MP Caroline Yadan, a prominent lawmaker who publicly identifies as an “unconditional” supporter of Israel. Yadan represents the 8th constituency for French citizens living overseas, a district where Israeli residents make up a substantial share of the voting electorate, and she has centered her entire political tenure on advancing policies that defend Israeli actions and interests. She has already openly broken with French President Emmanuel Macron over his official recognition of the Palestinian people’s right to statehood, and publicly condemned Macron in October 2024 after the president called for a halt to French weapons deliveries to Israel amid Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza. Yadan, who is Jewish, has defended the bill with an unsubstantiated claim that “For fifteen years, Jews have been killed in France ‘in the name of Gaza.’”

    If enacted, the bill would introduce a series of far-reaching new criminal offenses. It would make it a crime to deny Israel’s right to exist, and explicitly criminalize comparisons between the Israeli state and Nazi Germany — a legal protection that is not extended to France itself. The legislation also expands existing terrorism-related statutes to cover what the text labels “implicit” provocation, broadening the definition of “apology for terrorism” to include the “minimising or trivialising” of terror attacks.

    Under the bill’s first article, anyone found guilty of speech interpreted as justifying or reframing acts designated as terrorism could face up to five years in prison and substantial financial fines. This broad language could even criminalize framing such acts as “resistance,” or providing contextual background that courts deem insufficiently condemnatory. Critics note the new wording would allow courts to treat attempts to explain the political root causes of violence as criminal acts, opening the door to widespread prosecution of dissenting political speech.

    Marc Trevidic, a former French anti-terrorism judge, has issued a sharp public warning about the dangerous implications of the bill’s vague wording. “Implicit provocation to terrorism: do you realize what that means? Becoming a censor of other people’s thoughts, trying to guess what a person really meant,” Trevidic said.

    One high-profile provision expands existing French laws on crimes against humanity, explicitly classifying any comparison between Israel and Nazi Germany as “outrageous trivialization” of the Holocaust, a criminal offense under the new legislation. The bill’s preamble makes its core intent unambiguous: it explicitly states that framing the Israeli state as equivalent to the Nazi regime must be treated as a criminal act, effectively shielding Israel from one of the most politically charged forms of criticism directed at the country’s policies.

    The legislation builds on France’s already strict existing speech regulations, which have criminalized Holocaust denial under the 1990 Gayssot Act for decades. But legal experts and free speech advocates note the new measures go far beyond existing prohibitions, extending criminal liability into a broad swathe of mainstream political expression. As the first parliamentary vote approaches, the clash between the bill’s cross-party backers and mass public opposition has put France’s commitment to free expression under unprecedented national scrutiny.

  • Norwegian effectively cured of HIV after transplant from brother

    Norwegian effectively cured of HIV after transplant from brother

    In a groundbreaking medical announcement made Monday, a 63-year-old Norwegian man has been pronounced functionally cured of HIV, marking one of the raiest and most hopeful breakthroughs in global HIV research in recent years. Dubbed the “Oslo patient,” he becomes the first person worldwide to achieve long-term HIV remission following a stem cell transplant from a related family member, joining a small group of fewer than 10 people globally who have reached this milestone after receiving transplants to treat concurrent blood cancer.

    The patient had lived with an HIV diagnosis since 2006, before receiving a devastating secondary diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome, a life-threatening blood cancer, in 2017. His care team at Oslo University Hospital launched a search for a suitable donor that could address both conditions, ultimately turning to the patient’s older brother when no matching unrelated donor with the required genetic trait was found. In a stunning twist of fate revealed on the day of the 2020 transplant, doctors discovered the brother unknowingly carried the rare CCR5Δ32 genetic mutation—an alteration that blocks HIV from entering and infecting human immune cells. Only 1% of northern European populations carry this rare protective mutation.

    “It was like winning the lottery twice,” lead study author Dr. Anders Eivind Myhre, of Oslo University Hospital, told Agence France-Presse. The case study detailing the achievement was published in the journal *Nature Microbiology*. Two years post-transplant, when the patient discontinued his daily antiretroviral therapy that had long kept his viral load suppressed, researchers found no trace of replicating HIV in samples of his blood, bone marrow, or intestinal tissue. “For all practical purposes, we are quite certain that he is cured,” Myhre confirmed. The patient, who has chosen to remain anonymous, is now thriving with abundant energy and reports enjoying a full, unrestricted life, according to his care team.

    Unlike the handful of prior cured HIV cases that relied on unrelated donor transplants, the Oslo case marks the first time a successful cure has been achieved with a family member donor. Study co-author Dr. Marius Troseid of the University of Oslo explained that the patient’s entire immune system has been fully replaced by the donor’s genetically resistant cells—a complete reconstitution that has been clearly documented in both his bone marrow and gut tissue for the first time in any cured HIV patient. Given his current excellent health, Troseid noted that the “Oslo patient” label may no longer fit: “The Oslo patient is perhaps no longer a patient. At least he doesn’t feel like it.”

    This achievement builds on a decades-long line of incremental breakthroughs, starting with the first ever declared HIV cure, that of Timothy Ray Brown, the “Berlin patient,” in 2008. Subsequent cases have since been reported in London, New York, Geneva, Düsseldorf, and other cities around the world, with one 2024 case even achieving long-term remission without a donor carrying two copies of the mutated CCR5 gene, expanding researchers’ understanding of what makes a cure possible.

    Crucially, experts stress that the high-risk, invasive stem cell transplant procedure remains only an option for the small subset of people living with HIV who also have a life-threatening blood cancer, making it completely unfeasible for the more than 38 million people globally living with HIV. Still, researchers remain optimistic that the insights gained from studying these rare, successful cases will deepen scientific understanding of how HIV persists in the body and pave the way for a widely accessible cure that can help all people living with the virus end their lifelong reliance on antiretroviral treatment.

  • Monster typhoon in the Pacific Ocean is bearing down on group of remote US islands

    Monster typhoon in the Pacific Ocean is bearing down on group of remote US islands

    The strongest tropical cyclone recorded on Earth so far this year, Super Typhoon Sinlaku, is advancing rapidly toward remote U.S. island territories in the Western Pacific, with emergency officials bracing for catastrophic wind damage, widespread flooding, and destructive rainfall as the storm nears landfall. As of Monday, the storm had maintained sustained maximum winds of 173 miles per hour (278 kilometers per hour), placing it well within the super typhoon classification—an intensity category equivalent to a Category 4 or 5 Atlantic hurricane, reserved for the North Pacific’s most powerful systems. The Joint Typhoon Warning Center, which has tracked super typhoons in the region since 1947, projects Sinlaku will make landfall on the Northern Mariana Islands Tuesday, and will retain Category 4 or 5 strength even as it weakens slightly over the coming 48 hours. The storm’s projected path places the islands of Rota, Tinian, and Saipan directly at risk, while Guam, a major U.S. territory that hosts key American military installations, has already been placed under a tropical storm warning, with damaging winds expected to begin impacting the island as early as Monday. U.S. Coast Guard officials first issued high wind and flood warnings for Guam over the weekend, and military leaders have ordered service members to prepare for the storm and shelter in place—an urgent step that comes just two years after Typhoon Mawar knocked out power across Guam for days, causing widespread disruption. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump approved emergency disaster declarations for both Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, unlocking federal resources to support local emergency response efforts and speed assistance to affected communities after the storm passes. Super typhoons are the highest classification for tropical cyclones that form in the northwestern Pacific, the ocean basin that consistently produces Earth’s most intense storm systems. To qualify as a super typhoon, a cyclone must produce sustained winds of at least 150 mph (240 kph), and more than 300 such storms have been recorded by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center since the naming convention was adopted in 1947. The approaching storm aligns with recent research finding that rising ocean temperatures driven by climate change are supercharging tropical cyclone intensity, increasing the risk of extreme damage when powerful storms make landfall.

  • Ruili celebrates annual Water-Splashing Festival with blessings

    Ruili celebrates annual Water-Splashing Festival with blessings

    Nestled in southwest China’s Yunnan Province within the Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, the border city of Ruili came alive with vibrant color, joyful laughter and age-old tradition over the weekend of April 11, 2026, as it hosted its iconic annual Water-Splashing Festival. The event, a cornerstone of local Dai cultural identity that marks the beginning of the Dai New Year, drew participants from dozens of ethnic communities across the region, turning the city into a sprawling celebration of shared heritage and collective goodwill.

    The festivities kicked off with a grand opening ceremony that placed intangible cultural heritage front and center. Traditional performances from the Dai and De’ang ethnic groups dominated the stage, bringing centuries-old artistic practices to life for attendees. The iconic peacock dance, renowned for its graceful, fluid movements that mimic the elegant bird central to Dai mythology, blended seamlessly with the thunderous, rhythmic elephant-foot drum dance. Every beat of the large carved drums and every fluid gesture of the dancers held deep cultural meaning, captivating onlookers and setting a festive tone for the days of celebration ahead.

    Once the official opening concluded, the celebration spilled out onto the streets and riverbanks of Ruili, particularly along the scenic shoreline of the Ruili River. Equipped with everything from traditional wooden basins to modern water guns, participants of all ages and ethnic backgrounds rushed into the fun, splashing one another with cool, refreshing water as a symbolic gesture of blessing. For generations, this ritual has carried profound meaning: the water is believed to wash away misfortunes and negativity from the past year, clearing the way for good luck, prosperity and health in the coming months.

    Joyful shouts and peals of laughter echoed across the riverbank as crowds sang, danced and joined together in the fun, embodying the spirit of unity that defines the festival. What began as a sacred cultural observance for local ethnic communities has grown into an inclusive event that brings together people from all walks of life, showcasing the rich multicultural tapestry of southwest China and preserving beloved traditions for new generations.

  • Pope Leo responds to Trump, saying he will continue to ‘speak out’

    Pope Leo responds to Trump, saying he will continue to ‘speak out’

    A growing diplomatic and religious rift has emerged between U.S. former President Donald Trump and Pope Leo XIV, the first American-born pontiff in Roman Catholic history, after the pontiff’s public rebuke of Trump’s threats against Iran triggered a sharp personal attack from the former president.

    The conflict began when Pope Leo XIV publicly pushed back against aggressive rhetoric from Trump targeting the Islamic Republic of Iran, warning that escalatory threats risked sparking broader regional instability and endangering civilian lives across the Middle East. That condemnation quickly prompted a retaliatory attack from Trump, who took aim at the pontiff’s leadership and his unprecedented role as the first U.S. citizen to lead the global Catholic Church.

    In a recent public statement responding to Trump’s criticism, Pope Leo XIV made clear that his commitment to advocating for peace and global justice would not be silenced. The pontiff reaffirmed that the Catholic Church has long played a role in speaking out against aggression and promoting diplomatic solutions to global conflict, and that his position on Iran was rooted in that longstanding tradition, rather than political alignment.

    Observers note that the exchange marks a rare high-profile clash between a sitting (and future prospective) U.S. political leader and the head of the Catholic Church, particularly given the historic context of Pope Leo XIV’s ascension as the first American pope. The disagreement also highlights the growing intersection of religious leadership and global political discourse, as the pontiff continues to weigh in on pressing international security issues that impact millions of people worldwide.

  • US judge dismisses $10bn Trump defamation suit against Wall Street Journal

    US judge dismisses $10bn Trump defamation suit against Wall Street Journal

    A Florida federal judge has tossed out a high-profile defamation lawsuit brought by former President and current 2024 presidential candidate Donald Trump against the Wall Street Journal, its parent company News Corp, and media magnate Rupert Murdoch, stemming from a 2024 report linking Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The dismissal opens the door for Trump to refile an amended complaint, setting the stage for a continued legal battle over the controversial reporting.

    Trump first launched the suit last summer, demanding no less than $10 billion in damages over the Journal’s exclusive July 17 report. The story centered on a handwritten entry in a 2003 birthday book presented to Epstein, which the outlet claimed included Trump’s name and a crude drawing of a woman’s body. The former president has long maintained the entry is a fabrication, arguing the publication’s claims amounted to damaging defamation that tarnished his reputation.

    In his 12-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles made clear that Trump failed to meet the stringent legal standard required to proceed with a defamation claim brought by a public figure. Under longstanding U.S. defamation law, public figures must prove a news outlet acted with “actual malice” — meaning the organization either knew the reporting was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth — to win a damages claim. Gayles wrote that Trump had come “nowhere close” to satisfying this high legal threshold, and that the former president had not plausibly alleged the Journal published the story with malicious intent.

    Crucially, the judge dismissed the case without prejudice, a procedural ruling that allows Trump to submit an amended, corrected lawsuit by the court’s April 27 deadline. In response to the ruling, a lawyer for Trump told CBS News — the U.S. news partner of the BBC — that the former president intends to refile what he called a “powerhouse” amended suit. The legal team added that Trump remains committed to “hold accountable those who traffic in Fake News to mislead the American People.”

    The reporting at the center of the case has been a flashpoint in national conversations about Trump’s long-rumored ties to Epstein, the wealthy financier who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. Weeks after the Journal published its original report, Democratic lawmakers released an image of the handwritten birthday note to the public on social media, ahead of the scheduled release of a trove of sealed court documents related to Epstein’s case. Though the Journal never published the image itself, the details of the outlet’s description of the note matched the image released by lawmakers. Trump has repeatedly denied writing the entry, calling it a “fake thing” fabricated to hurt his political standing.

  • Controlled demolition brings down luxury Miami hotel in seconds

    Controlled demolition brings down luxury Miami hotel in seconds

    In a dramatic display of controlled urban engineering, one of Miami’s iconic luxury hospitality landmarks, the former Mandarin Oriental hotel, was reduced to rubble in mere seconds via planned implosion on Wednesday. The carefully coordinated demolition, executed by a team of specialized structural engineers, cleared the 2.2-acre waterfront plot to make way for a far larger mixed-use development that will reshape the city’s iconic skyline.

    Local urban planning officials confirmed that the new project will combine high-end residential units, expanded hospitality spaces, and public retail areas, representing a multi-billion-dollar investment in Miami’s continued waterfront revitalization. In statements ahead of the implosion, project leaders emphasized that extensive safety measures were put in place to protect nearby residents and businesses, including temporary road closures and air quality monitoring to mitigate dust and debris.

    The original Mandarin Oriental opened in 2000 and quickly established itself as a go-to destination for high-profile visitors and luxury travelers, cementing Miami’s reputation as a top global luxury resort hub. Its demolition marks a key turning point in the city’s ongoing evolution, as developers prioritize larger, more comprehensive mixed-use projects to meet growing demand for coastal living and tourism infrastructure in the fast-growing South Florida metro.

    Local residents gathered at designated viewing spots across Biscayne Bay to watch the implosion, with many documenting the historic moment on social media. While some long-time community members expressed nostalgia for the iconic hotel, most have expressed cautious optimism about the economic and infrastructure benefits the new development is expected to bring to the area.

  • French cement giant guilty of financing militant groups including Islamic State

    French cement giant guilty of financing militant groups including Islamic State

    In a historic legal milestone that marks the first time a corporation has stood trial on terrorism financing charges in France, Paris-based judges have delivered a guilty verdict against global cement manufacturer Lafarge for paying millions of dollars in extortion and protection payments to designated jihadist groups, including the self-proclaimed Islamic State (IS), to maintain operations at its Syrian plant amid the country’s ongoing civil war. Eight former senior Lafarge employees, including the firm’s one-time chief executive officer Bruno Lafont, were also convicted of the same terrorism financing charges on Monday, with Lafont handed a six-year prison sentence by the court.

    The judicial panel confirmed that between 2013 and 2014, at the height of escalating conflict in northern Syria, Lafarge transferred a total of $6.5 million (equivalent to €5.59 million or £4.83 million at current exchange rates) to armed militant groups to keep its Jalabiya cement factory operational. The plant, which Lafarge acquired for $680 million in 2008 and launched just months before the 2011 outbreak of the Syrian civil war, sat in territory that had fallen under the control of multiple jihadist factions by 2013.

    Presiding judge Isabelle Prevost-Desprez outlined the gravity of the offenses in court, emphasizing that these direct payments allowed banned terrorist organizations to consolidate control over Syria’s critical natural resources, generating critical revenue that they used to fund violent attacks across the Middle East and into European countries. “It is clear to the court that the sole purpose of the funding of a terrorist organisation was to keep the Syrian plant running for economic reasons. Payments to terrorist entities enabled Lafarge to continue its operations,” Prevost-Desprez stated. She added that the financial arrangement amounted to “a genuine commercial partnership with IS.”

    Prosecutors laid out details of the payments during the trial, explaining that Lafarge’s personnel were based in the nearby northern town of Manbij and were forced to cross the Euphrates River to reach the plant. Of the total transfers, roughly €800,000 went toward securing safe passage for staff and supplies, while an additional €1.6 million was paid to access raw material from quarries controlled directly by IS. Alongside IS, the court confirmed the Nusra Front—an al-Qaeda-affiliated group designated as a terrorist organization by the European Union and most of the global community—also received payments from the firm.

    Beyond Lafont’s six-year sentence, Christian Herrault, Lafarge’s former deputy managing director, received a five-year prison term. Syrian former employee Firas Tlass, who directly facilitated the payments to militant groups, was sentenced in absentia to seven years behind bars. Herrault had defended his actions during the trial, arguing that the decision to keep the factory open stemmed from a sense of responsibility to local staff. “We could have washed our hands of it and walked away, but what would have happened to the factory’s employees?” he said.

    Lafarge, which is now a subsidiary of Swiss building materials conglomerate Holcim, was fined more than €1 million ($1.3 million) as part of the verdict. The company has not yet issued an official public statement following the ruling, and a separate parallel investigation into allegations that the company was complicit in crimes against humanity remains ongoing.

    This French conviction comes three years after a 2022 legal settlement in the United States, where Lafarge admitted to violating U.S. sanctions by providing support to designated terrorist groups and agreed to pay a $777.8 million (£687.2 million) penalty to resolve the charges. The case is widely regarded as a landmark precedent for corporate accountability in relation to business operations in conflict zones where terrorist groups control territory.

    To provide context for the case, Syria’s civil war erupted in March 2011 after the regime of then-president Bashar al-Assad launched a brutal crackdown on peaceful anti-government protests. By 2014, IS had seized large swathes of territory across northern Syria and neighboring Iraq, declaring a transnational “caliphate” and enforcing a violent, extremist interpretation of Islamic law across the areas under its control.

  • China develops key composite module for reusable spacecraft

    China develops key composite module for reusable spacecraft

    China has achieved a landmark technological milestone in its reusable launch vehicle development program, with the country’s first 5-meter-diameter composite rocket module rolling off the production line on April 11, 2026. Developed by the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology based in Beijing, this new component is the largest domestically produced composite module ever built for a reusable launch system, and is slated for use in a high-priority national space initiative.

    Composite materials make up more than 60 percent of the module’s total construction, bringing major advantages in weight reduction compared to traditional metallic rocket structures. Despite its lightweight design, the module’s engineered wall panels are capable of withstanding an axial compressive load of up to 1,000 metric tons, while integrated self-adaptive adjustment interfaces add enhanced functionality for vehicle integration. The development team overcame a series of complex engineering hurdles, most notably the challenge of high-precision, high-quality manufacturing of large-scale advanced composite structures. Remarkably, the entire process from initial conceptual design to final production and delivery was completed in just seven months, a timeline that underscores the program’s rapid progress.

    The breakthrough comes as China continues to advance its ambitious goal of building a full fleet of reusable rockets, a technology that is expected to slash space launch costs significantly while boosting the efficiency and enabling higher frequency of orbital space missions. Following this successful production milestone, the Beijing-based academy is now preparing to conduct a key recovery test for its reusable rocket prototype in the coming months, moving the program one step closer to operational deployment.

  • UK report lays bare ‘catastrophic’ missed chances before stabbings at girls’ dance class

    UK report lays bare ‘catastrophic’ missed chances before stabbings at girls’ dance class

    In the wake of one of the most brutal acts of violence in recent British history, a landmark public inquiry has concluded that the 2024 mass stabbing that left three young girls dead and 10 others injured at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport, northwestern England, could and should have been averted. The attack, carried out by 17-year-old Axel Rudakubana, exposed cascading, repeated missed opportunities for intervention by both public agencies and the teenager’s own parents as his violent obsessions escalated over years, retired judge Adrian Fulford, who led the nine-week probe, outlined in a 763-page final report released Monday.

    Fulford’s report catalogs a years-long pattern of red flags that were never properly addressed, documenting dozens of moments when targeted action could have stopped Rudakubana before he launched his attack. He described the killings as unprecedented in the UK for their “extreme and very particular depravity,” emphasizing that the sheer volume of unaddressed warning signs directly enabled the catastrophe.

    “One of the most striking conclusions from this inquiry’s extensive investigation is the sheer number of missed opportunities over many years to intervene meaningfully, which directly contributed to the failure to avert this disaster,” Fulford said. “The consequences were catastrophic.”

    Rudakubana is currently serving a life sentence with a 52-year minimum term before eligibility for parole, convicted of murdering 9-year-old Alice da Silva Aguiar, 7-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe, and 6-year-old Bebe King. Eight children and two adults were also wounded in the targeted attack on the children’s dance class.

    In the days immediately after the attack, Southport was rocked by days of far-right unrest, after extremist groups circulated false claims that the attacker was a recently arrived Muslim migrant. In reality, Rudakubana was born in Wales to Rwandan Christian parents.

    The inquiry’s investigation laid bare systemic failures across multiple public institutions: police, social services, education authorities, and the UK’s anti-extremism program Prevent all missed critical chances to intervene. As early as 2019, when Rudakubana was just 13, he was convicted of assaulting a fellow student with a hockey stick, and placed under youth offender supervision. Between 2019 and 2021, he was referred to Prevent three separate times for openly expressing fascination with school shootings, the 2017 London Bridge terror attack, the IRA, and political violence in the Middle East. In each instance, investigators closed his case after determining he was not at risk of radicalization into terrorism.

    Over that same period, local police were called to Rudakubana’s home five times in response to concerns over his behavior. He was connected to mental health and educational support services, but gradually disengagement from social work support. He was ultimately expelled from school after being caught carrying a knife, and rarely attended any alternative education placement afterward. In Fulford’s assessment, the teenager’s care became a disjointed “merry-go-round of referrals, assessments, case-closures and ‘hand-offs’” between disconnected public agencies, with no entity taking responsibility for monitoring his escalating risk.

    Fulford highlighted one particularly glaring missed opportunity in March 2022, when Rudakubana was stopped on a bus carrying a knife. When questioned by police, he openly admitted he wanted to stab someone, and confessed he had been attempting to manufacture poison. According to Fulford, this encounter should have resulted in immediate arrest and a home search, which would have uncovered his purchases of ricin-producing seeds and downloads of terrorist propaganda on his personal computer. Instead, Rudakubana was released without arrest and returned to his parents’ custody.

    The report also notes that Rudakubana’s parents, who lived in fear of their son, failed to report the multiple weapons he purchased, his persistent threatening behavior, and his graphic threats of violence. While Fulford emphasized these parental failures contributed to the tragedy, he urged against public vilification of the couple, noting their home life had become overwhelming.

    “Their life at home must have become little short of a nightmare given, to use the words of his own father, AR had turned into a ‘monster,’” Fulford said.

    After the attack, a search of Rudakubana’s home uncovered the ricin toxin hidden under his bed and a downloaded copy of an al-Qaida training manual. Despite this find, counterterrorism police concluded the attack did not qualify as an act of terrorism, as Rudakubana had no clear political or religious ideological motivation for his violence.

    The inquiry has put forward 67 formal recommendations to address systemic gaps and prevent similar atrocities from occurring in the future. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged to implement sweeping reforms to correct the systemic failures that led to the attack. “The report today is truly harrowing and profoundly disturbing,” Starmer said. “While nothing will ever bring these three little girls back, I’m determined to make the fundamental changes needed to keep the public safe.”

    Starmer has previously argued that the case highlights a shifting nature of extremist violence in the UK, suggesting that existing laws may need to be updated to better address the growing threat of extreme violence perpetrated by isolated, self-radicalized individuals operating outside formal terrorist groups.