作者: admin

  • Three years of messages at once – a chronicle of Sudan’s war pours in as trapped reporter’s phone turns on

    Three years of messages at once – a chronicle of Sudan’s war pours in as trapped reporter’s phone turns on

    On April 15, 2026, Sudan’s devastating civil war marks the end of its third year and slides into a fourth year of unrelenting violence – a milestone that survivor and journalist-academic Mohamed Suleiman says is a damning indictment of global failure to end the crisis.

    Suleiman’s journey to safety in the coastal city of Port Sudan, which he completed in January 2026 after a two-month trek through Chad, ended three years of entrapment in el-Fasher, the capital of Sudan’s western Darfur region. For 18 of those years, el-Fasher was held under a brutal tight siege by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the paramilitary group that has been locked in a power struggle with Sudan’s regular army since the war first erupted in Khartoum in April 2023. Cut off from all outside contact by a total communications blackout, Suleiman found himself unable to share the full horror of what he watched unfold on the city’s streets.

    It was only when he stepped into a Port Sudan telecom office in January that he reconnected to the digital world, a moment that brought immediate, overwhelming tears. “Throughout the past three years, my phone was silent. After I inserted the SIM card, my tears flowed,” he told the BBC. Three years of unread messages flooded his device, each one a record of staggering loss: updates of colleagues killed in the violence, desperate pleas from friends begging for confirmation he was still alive. He recalled one caller who refused to believe he had survived until they spoke via video call, breaking down in tears when the connection confirmed Suleiman was alive.

    For Suleiman, the silence of the blackout was nearly as deadly as the open violence of the war. “It was a suffocating feeling because I was watching systematic killings through drone strikes and bombs or deadly killing through the tight siege” imposed by the RSF, he said. When the RSF finally seized full control of el-Fasher in October 2025, he described the scene as nothing less than “the Day of Judgment on Earth.”

    The fall of el-Fasher stands as one of the war’s most brutal chapters. The conflict, sparked by a falling-out between the army and its former ally the RSF, quickly spread from Khartoum across the country, with Darfur emerging as the epicenter of some of the worst violence. As the war enters its fourth year, Sudan has been effectively partitioned into separate territories held by the two warring parties. More than 12 million Sudanese have been displaced, creating the world’s worst active humanitarian crisis, with millions scattered across refugee camps inside the country and across neighboring borders.

    Civilians trapped in el-Fasher during the siege endured unthinkable conditions: a UN-backed food monitor officially declared famine in the city as food and water supplies dwindled to nothing. When the RSF advanced to take full control of the city, the chaotic escape attempt that followed left dead children abandoned in streets, and starving women too weak to carry their own children forced to leave them by the roadside. “You cannot do anything. So you step over them, jump over them, cry, and continue walking,” Suleiman recounted.

    Countless dead and injured were left abandoned along the road to the nearby safe haven of Tawila, a tragedy Suleiman says could have been mitigated if only trapped residents had been able to call for outside help. He argues the full scale of what unfolded in el-Fasher remains unknown to the global public and even to Sudan’s transitional government, because the communications blackout and danger faced by journalists prevented any accurate, widespread reporting from the city.

    Both warring sides have been accused of systematic war crimes, including mass civilian casualties from airstrikes and drone attacks. The RSF has acknowledged that isolated individual violations took place during the takeover of el-Fasher but claims these are under investigation and argues that the scale of atrocities has been exaggerated by its political opponents.

    Communications infrastructure in el-Fasher collapsed almost immediately after the war began, damaged by fighting and crippled by fuel shortages that cut power to the entire city. The blackout was solidified once the RSF laid full siege to the city in May 2024. A small number of residents managed to smuggle in Starlink satellite internet devices, but the hardware was prohibitively expensive, restricted by the army when it controlled the city, and immediately confiscated by the RSF if discovered. Journalists who managed to access satellite connections faced deadly accusations of espionage from both sides: the RSF claimed users worked for foreign security agencies, while the army accused journalists of acting as enemy target spotters to direct artillery fire. These risks silenced most attempts to get news out of the city.

    Suleiman himself nearly died in the siege: in July 2025, an artillery shell landed less than two meters from him as he walked home. He escaped unharmed, but lay trapped on the ground for half an hour, unable to call for any help even if he had been injured. Drones patrolled the skies constantly, and even turning on a disconnected phone to check the time put users at risk, as the screen light could draw targeted fire. Residents were forced to hide for hours at a time under beds, in trenches, or in makeshift shelters during heavy shelling, sweltering in extreme heat, unable to speak or share their situation with the outside world. “You remain silent, unable to speak. And you cannot convey what you are seeing,” he said.

    Amid the daily horror, Suleiman says residents clung to their faith, gathering to read the Quran in between rounds of shelling, moving from room to room to avoid incoming fire. When he finally arrived in Port Sudan, the military-backed government’s de facto headquarters for most of the war, he prostrated himself at the airport and cried, unable to believe he had reached safety.

    Even in safety, however, Suleiman has faced new struggles. He lost all his official identification documents during his escape, and navigating Sudan’s bureaucracy to replace them has been a grueling, weeks-long process. He notes that special procedures for war survivors announced by officials have failed to materialize, pointing out that the requirements for witnesses and family verification leave many displaced survivors with no path to restore their identity documents. He is calling on the government to issue free replacement identification to all people fleeing conflict zones.

    Now reconnected to the global world, Suleiman says the world has failed Sudan at every turn. He is scathing in his criticism of international bodies and global powers, arguing that ongoing diplomatic efforts to end the war have achieved nothing. US-led diplomatic initiatives have collapsed entirely, while both warring sides continue to receive military backing from competing regional powers that allow the fighting to continue. A September 2025 peace plan drafted by the Quad grouping – the U.S., Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt – has stalled completely, and current efforts by U.S. envoy Massad Boulos to negotiate even a limited humanitarian ceasefire have yet to deliver results.

    The UN’s 2026 humanitarian appeal for Sudan, which totals $2.87 billion, has only received 16.2% of its required funding to date, leaving aid organizations unable to meet the overwhelming need for food, medical care and shelter across the country. Humanitarian access is also blocked by ongoing fighting and bureaucratic restrictions imposed by both the army and RSF.

    Today, Sudan is a fragmented nation, its people scattered across borders and displaced within its own territory. For Suleiman, however, telling the story of what happened to el-Fasher and its people gives him a clear purpose. “There are events that happened that no-one is left to narrate, and the memory remains only with us… until we die, we will convey the truth to correct the situation for the next generation, so they live dignified and honoured in their homeland,” he said.

  • AFL Players’ Association CEO James Gallagher on Lance Collard’s homophobic slur ban

    AFL Players’ Association CEO James Gallagher on Lance Collard’s homophobic slur ban

    A controversial nine-week suspension handed to St Kilda AFL forward Lance Collard for a repeated homophobic slur incident has drawn formal response from the AFL Players’ Association (AFLPA), with the governing body voicing disappointment and pushing for sweeping systemic change to how the sport handles discriminatory conduct.

    Collard received the penalty this week following a hearing into his verbal abuse of a Victorian Football League (VFL) opponent, where he was recorded using an openly homophobic slur during a match against Frankston. The nine-week sentence includes a nine-week playing ban, with two weeks of the punishment deferred to the end of the current season. This marks Collard’s second breach of the league’s anti-discrimination rules: he previously served a six-week suspension in 2024 for an identical offence of using a homophobic slur.

    In addition to this latest penalty, Collard is already serving a separate two-match ban for a high tackle offence committed during the same Frankston match. Throughout the tribunal process, Collard has consistently maintained his innocence, with his legal team arguing that a harsh suspension for the second offence could have irreversible, life-ruining impacts on his young playing career. To date, Collard has appeared in 15 senior AFL matches for St Kilda.

    AFLPA chief executive James Gallagher released an official public statement Wednesday confirming the association’s position, noting that while the entire Australian Football industry shares a unified goal of eliminating homophobia from the sport, the current case underscores deep flaws in the existing approach to addressing discrimination.

    Gallagher explained that the tribunal itself acknowledged that complex issues like homophobia and racism cannot be resolved through polarizing debate centered on whether offending language was used, and that the AFLPA is disappointed the panel did not accept Collard’s consistent claims of innocence. The association will continue to provide full support to Collard and St Kilda Football Club throughout the process, including exploring all possible avenues for an appeal against the suspension.

    “A holistic solution that doesn’t focus solely on punitive measures can only be realised through meaningful engagement with LGBTIQA+ community leaders, education that reflects diverse backgrounds and experiences of players, alongside a disciplinary process that is fit for purpose, minimises and remedies the harms caused and shifts behaviour,” Gallagher said.

    He added that through collective bargaining agreements, the AFLPA has already negotiated a formal shared commitment with the broader AFL to embed equality, inclusion and safety across the sport, and work continues to progress these pledges to make the game welcoming and safe for all participants. Gallagher also acknowledged the far-reaching impact of the entire disciplinary process on multiple affected groups, including the LGBTIQA+ community, First Nations communities, and Collard and his family.

  • Trump hints Iran talks could resume this week as US port blockade continues

    Trump hints Iran talks could resume this week as US port blockade continues

    Nearly two months after Iran came under coordinated air strikes from the United States and Israel, the region remains at a dangerous geopolitical crossroads, with a new US naval blockade of Iranian ports threatening to upend a fragile two-week ceasefire and raise the stakes for upcoming diplomatic talks.

    The current crisis traces back to collapsed weekend negotiations hosted in Islamabad, Pakistan, that failed to bridge deep divides between Washington and Tehran, primarily over the future of Iran’s nuclear program. In the wake of the failed talks, US President Donald Trump ordered the full enforcement of a maritime blockade targeting all commercial traffic entering or exiting Iranian coastal areas, a move designed to cut off two of Tehran’s most critical revenue streams: crude oil exports and shipping tolls collected for passage through the Strait of Hormuz. As of Tuesday, more than a dozen US warships and roughly 10,000 American military personnel are deployed to enforce the blockade.

    US Central Command, which oversees American military operations across the Middle East and Central Asia, confirmed that in the first 24 hours of the blockade going into effect, six commercial merchant vessels complied with US orders to turn back toward Iranian ports. But independent verification by BBC Verify’s ship-tracking analysis tells a more complicated story: at least seven vessels, four linked directly to Iranian shipping interests and three foreign-flagged ships, successfully crossed the Strait of Hormuz despite the US operational order.

    The military escalation has thrown the future of the existing two-week ceasefire, which is scheduled to expire next week, into serious question. Even so, there have been tentative signals from multiple stakeholders that negotiations between the US and Iran could restart as soon as this week. In an interview with the *New York Post*, President Trump suggested that a resumption of talks was likely within 48 hours, noting that US negotiators remain positioned in the region to reconvene. “You should stay there [Islamabad], really, because something could be happening over the next two days, and we’re more inclined to go there,” Trump told the outlet.

    United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres has also voiced cautious optimism, saying he considers it “highly probable” that talks will get back on track. Separate anonymous official sources from Gulf states, Pakistan and Iran confirmed to Reuters that both US and Iranian negotiating teams are expected to return to Islamabad later this week, though a firm starting date has not yet been finalized. Tehran has not yet issued an official public response to Trump’s latest remarks on restarting talks.

    The core sticking point that derailed the previous round of talks remains Iran’s nuclear program. A senior US official told CBS News, a partner outlet of the BBC, that Washington has demanded a 20-year full suspension of all Iranian uranium enrichment activities. But Tehran has only offered a five-year halt to enrichment, according to sources cited by other US media outlets, leaving a significant gap between the two sides’ opening positions.

    The economic fallout of the ongoing standoff has already rippled through global commodity markets. For weeks, the conflict has disrupted global energy supplies, after Iran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz—one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for global oil and natural gas transportation—shortly after the February air strikes. On Tuesday, however, growing hopes that diplomatic talks would resume calmed volatile oil markets, pushing benchmark crude prices below the $100 per barrel threshold for the first time in recent weeks.

    Global powers have already begun weighing in on the US blockade, with starkly differing views. The International Monetary Fund has already warned that the protracted conflict could push the entire global economy into a recession, but US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defended the strategy in comments to the BBC, arguing that a “small bit of economic pain” is a reasonable tradeoff for long-term global security. China, a key diplomatic and economic partner of Iran, has taken a far harder line, calling the blockade “dangerous and irresponsible” on Tuesday and warning that it would only inflame regional tensions and irreparably damage the fragile ceasefire agreement.

    In a separate, unrelated development in regional diplomacy, Israel and Lebanon announced Tuesday that they will launch the first direct official negotiations between the two nations since 1993, following a day of talks in Washington DC. The talks stem from ongoing cross-border tensions triggered by Israeli air strikes targeting the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Both sides described the initial meeting at the US State Department as a positive step: Lebanon’s ambassador to the US called the discussions “productive”, while his Israeli counterpart said the talks open a path to a “new era of peace.” A senior unnamed US official emphasized to the BBC that the Israel-Lebanon negotiations are completely separate from the ongoing US-Iran talks in Pakistan, with no overlapping agenda or linkage.

  • In Hormuz war of words, US illustrates threat with ‘drug boat’ hit

    In Hormuz war of words, US illustrates threat with ‘drug boat’ hit

    Rising geopolitical friction between the United States and Iran has reached a dangerous new flashpoint in the Strait of Hormuz, after former U.S. President Donald Trump announced a full naval blockade of the critical global waterway over the weekend, followed by stark threats to destroy any Iranian craft approaching the enforcement line. The escalation, which comes six weeks after the two nations launched an undeclared conflict in the region, has put major energy and trade supplies at risk and drawn pushback from global powers including China, while experts warn the standoff could freeze all maritime traffic through the strait entirely.

    Trump first outlined the blockade order on his Truth Social platform Sunday, framing the move as a response to Iran’s earlier partial closure of the strait, which Tehran implemented after the outbreak of hostilities. The U.S. leader accused Iran of engaging in “world extortion” by claiming potential unreported mines in the waterway and demanding tolls from passing vessels. “I have also instructed our Navy to seek and interdict every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran. No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas,” Trump wrote in his post, adding that U.S. forces would begin clearing mines laid by Iran and that any Iranian attack on U.S. personnel or civilian ships would be met with devastating force.

    On Monday, Trump doubled down on the aggressive posture, threatening that any Iranian vessels that “come anywhere close” to the U.S. blockade would be “immediately ELIMINATED” using the same lethal tactics his administration has deployed against suspected drug trafficking boats in international waters. He characterized the tactic as “quick and brutal,” and noted that 34 vessels passed through the strait on Sunday, the highest daily volume since Iran’s initial closure.

    Parallel to the U.S. escalation, Iran has issued its own firm warnings to Washington, vowing to respond with unforeseen military capabilities if conflict expands. A spokesperson for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) told the IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News Agency that if hostilities continue, Tehran will unveil new warfare capacities that enemy forces have no knowledge of, and that these methods will be largely difficult for the U.S. to counter. Iranian Lt. Col. Ebrahim Zolfaqari clarified Iran’s position, stressing that vessels affiliated with the U.S.-led blockade have no right to transit the strait now and in the future, while neutral civilian ships can still pass in compliance with Iranian armed forces regulations. Zolfaqari also warned that if the security of Iranian ports is jeopardized, no ports across the Persian Gulf or Sea of Oman will remain safe.

    The escalating confrontation has already split global powers, with NATO members confirming on Monday they would not participate in Trump’s blockade. China, which maintains active trade and energy agreements with Tehran, has openly defied the U.S. order. Chinese Defense Minister Dong Jun confirmed that Chinese commercial and military vessels continue transiting Hormuz waters in accordance with bilateral agreements with Iran, saying “We will respect and honor them and expect others not to meddle in our affairs. Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz, and it is open for us.”

    Maritime analysts warn the dual, competing blockades from the U.S. and Iran could create an unprecedented logjam in one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints. Salvatore Mercogliano, a maritime historian at Campbell University in North Carolina, told Al Jazeera that he expects U.S. naval forces to turn away exiting vessels while staying out of range of Iran’s coastal missiles and drones, resulting in two overlapping blockade operations. This scenario, Mercogliano noted, carries a serious risk of freezing all incoming and outgoing shipping through the strait entirely, a disruption that would send shockwaves through global energy and commodity markets.

    To back up his threat against Iranian vessels, Trump highlighted his administration’s ongoing campaign of lethal airstrikes against suspected drug trafficking boats in international waters, a policy that has already killed more than 170 people and drawn widespread condemnation from human rights groups and international legal experts as extrajudicial killing. On the same day Trump issued his Hormuz threat, U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) carried out a new strike on a vessel in the eastern Pacific, which the command claims was operated by groups linked to narco-trafficking. No publicly released evidence has been provided to support the accusation, and the strike killed at least two people. The attack came just days after separate April 11 strikes on two other Pacific boats that left at least five more dead.

    Following the latest strike, SOUTHCOM published unclassified footage of the bombing on social media, labeling it a “lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations”—a move that critics say is part of a pattern of publicizing lethal operations without justifying their legality. Brian Finucane, senior adviser to the U.S. Program at the International Crisis Group, pointed out that the Trump administration has been eager to post graphic footage of these strikes online but has refused to defend the legal standing of the attacks in international waters.

    United Nations experts and multiple human rights organizations have formally condemned the boat bombing campaign as extrajudicial killing and murder, arguing that officials who ordered and carried out the strikes should face prosecution for homicide. Investigative journalist Nick Turse of The Intercept reported hours before Monday’s strike that the Trump administration is actively pressuring the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to shut down a potential inquiry into the illegal strikes across the Caribbean and Pacific. Last month, the commission held a public hearing where legal experts testified to the unlawful nature of the strikes. Angelo Guisado, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, told the commission that “The administration’s desire to play imperial superpower in the region cannot be a reason to completely displace the foundations of international law.”

    As of Monday, the standoff in the Strait of Hormuz shows no signs of de-escalation, with both sides holding firm to their competing blockade claims and raising the risk of an accidental clash that could spiral into full-scale open conflict across the Middle East.

  • Australia’s economy in “weakened state”, Bridget McKenzie says, as IMF delivers recession warning

    Australia’s economy in “weakened state”, Bridget McKenzie says, as IMF delivers recession warning

    As escalating tensions in the Middle East fuel mounting global recession fears, a senior Australian conservative senator has issued a stark warning that the nation enters this period of economic volatility in a significantly weakened position. The warning comes on the heels of a bleak updated economic outlook from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which cautions that the ongoing energy crisis sparked by Middle East hostilities could push the entire global economy into a sustained downturn.

    In its latest quarterly assessment, the IMF projects that Australia’s inflation rate will remain stubbornly above the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) target range of 2 to 3 percent for at least two more years. Forecasts put national inflation at 4 percent in 2026, with a gradual cooling to only 3.2 percent by 2027—still above the RBA’s policy goal. The Fund also predicts that Australia’s inflation-adjusted real gross domestic product (GDP) growth will decelerate sharply to just 2 percent in 2026, before sliding further to 1.6 percent in 2027.

    The international financial body emphasized that the ongoing Middle East conflict has created unprecedented new stress tests for interconnected global economies. Beyond the devastating humanitarian toll and destruction of critical regional infrastructure, the conflict has severely disrupted key global shipping lanes and air transit routes, the IMF noted, with spillover effects that will push commodity and consumer prices upward across every major region.

    Appearing on Seven Network’s morning current affairs program *Sunrise* alongside federal Housing Minister Clare O’Neil, Nationals Senator Bridget McKenzie framed the current economic landscape as deeply worrying. “We have entered this new global crisis already stuck in a high inflation, low growth scenario, which has left us in a far weaker position to absorb new shocks,” McKenzie argued. She echoed the IMF’s implicit call for fiscal discipline, stating that the Fund’s outlook confirms what opposition figures have argued for months: the current federal government must rein in its runaway spending to shore up the nation’s resilience.

    “The defining test for Treasurer Jim Chalmers in the upcoming May federal budget will be whether he makes the tough, necessary fiscal decisions that the Australian economy needs—decisions he has failed to make in three years in office—to protect our country from the worst impacts of this global crisis,” McKenzie added.

    Minister O’Neil pushed back on the criticism, acknowledging the profound uncertainty facing Australian households but outlining the federal government’s approach to balancing urgent relief for struggling families with responsible fiscal management. O’Neil pointed to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s recent diplomatic outreach across Asia as proof the government is already taking proactive steps to secure critical fuel supplies and insulate Australia from global energy market disruptions.

    “You’ve seen the Prime Minister travel across Asia, hold discussions with world leaders to guarantee our supply security and ensure Australia is prioritized for energy exports when markets are strained,” O’Neil said. She added that supporting Australian households is the government’s top priority heading into the budget, noting that many families were already facing severe cost-of-living pressures long before the latest outbreak of Middle East conflict pushed fuel prices higher.

    The IMF’s sobering report arrives just one day before Treasurer Chalmers departs for Washington D.C., where he is set to join G20 finance ministers and central bank governors for emergency talks focused on addressing spreading global economic uncertainty. When asked Wednesday whether the IMF’s projections align with internal forecasts from the Australian Treasury, Chalmers acknowledged the gravity of the moment.

    “This is an extraordinarily dangerous period for the global economy,” Chalmers told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. “The IMF is forecasting prolonged slow growth and persistent high inflation, and our own internal forecasts match that outlook. We will reflect these global developments in our official budget projections when we hand down the budget in May.”

    Chalmers emphasized that the IMF’s warning is a clear alarm bell for the most severe downside scenarios of the ongoing conflict. “What this tells us, over and over, is that an end to this war cannot come soon enough. We need a durable, lasting ceasefire, and we need the Strait of Hormuz—one of the world’s most critical energy shipping lanes—to be fully reopened,” he said. “Even once the conflict ends, we have to accept that many of its economic consequences will be felt around the world, including here in Australia, for months to come. Australians did not create this war, but they are already paying a heavy price for it.”

    In its report, the IMF urged advanced economies around the world to implement fiscal restraint, noting that many governments have run overly loose budgetary policies in recent years, worsening inflationary pressures. Critics, including dozens of prominent Australian economists, have argued that the Albanese government’s expansive spending agenda is itself a key driver of domestic inflation.

    Chalmers pushed back against that criticism Wednesday, noting that the IMF acknowledges different countries face different economic contexts. “We have already made substantial progress on budget repair over the past three and a half years,” he said. “We acknowledged even before the Middle East conflict broke out that more work needs to be done, and Australians will see the results of that work in the upcoming budget.”

    He acknowledged that the outbreak of hostilities in the Middle East has shifted budget priorities, but confirmed the May 12 budget will center on two core pillars: building economic resilience to external shocks and delivering targeted structural economic reform. Chalmers also left the door open to a potential extension of temporary fuel excise cuts if energy prices continue to climb in the coming months, stopping short of ruling out the policy change.

  • Texas lawmaker resigns after admitting affair with aide who died by suicide

    Texas lawmaker resigns after admitting affair with aide who died by suicide

    In a seismic development that has sent shockwaves through Capitol Hill, two sitting U.S. congressmembers — one Republican and one Democrat — formally stepped down from their congressional seats this week, exiting office amid mounting ethical pressure and public allegations of sexual misconduct.

    Texas Republican Representative Tony Gonzales was the second lawmaker to submit his resignation on Tuesday, capping weeks of growing controversy that began when he ultimately confirmed a years-long extramarital affair with a married congressional staffer, Regina Santos-Aviles. Santos-Aviles died by suicide in September 2025 near her Uvalde, Texas home after setting herself on fire, a finding confirmed by the local medical examiner and first reported by CBS News, the U.S. partner of the BBC.

    The timeline of the scandal accelerated rapidly over the past month. Gonzales, who had initially dismissed the claims of an affair as a coordinated political blackmail campaign to force him out of office, had already announced he would not seek re-election in the November 2026 midterm vote. But as new details of his misconduct emerged and a formal congressional ethics probe was launched, pressure for an immediate departure grew overwhelming.

    Parallel developments unfolded for California Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell, who faced a separate set of public allegations ranging from sexual harassment to assault against a former member of his own staff. After the allegations became public over the weekend, a groundswell of bipartisan criticism erupted, and congressional leadership moved quickly to open a formal ethics inquiry and debate holding full votes to expel both men from office. Maneuvering to avoid a humiliating forced expulsion — which would have cost both lawmakers their post-congressional pension benefits — both lawmakers opted to submit voluntary resignations, effective immediately this week.

    Swalwell, who had been running for the Democratic nomination for California governor before the allegations broke, dropped his gubernatorial campaign Sunday and announced his resignation Monday, even as he and his legal team have forcefully denied all claims against him. “These accusations are false, fabricated, and deeply offensive – a calculated and transparent political hit job,” said Swalwell’s attorney Sara Azari. In his final resignation letter submitted Tuesday, however, Swalales offered a muted apology, writing: “I am deeply sorry to my family, staff, and constituents for mistakes in judgement I’ve made in my past.”

    Gonzales, for his part, offered only a brief farewell in his own resignation letter, noting: “It has been my privilege to serve the residents of Texas’s 23rd congressional district.”

    The dual resignations, one from each major political party, have little impact on the partisan balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives, where Republicans hold a narrow but stable majority. Even with the two vacancies, Republicans will retain their controlling grip on the chamber for the remainder of the 119th Congress.

    The scandal has already reignited broader conversations about congressional accountability, workplace culture on Capitol Hill, and the leniency of rules that allow members accused of misconduct to resign voluntarily and retain taxpayer-funded benefits, rather than face expulsion and lose those privileges.

  • China faces Trump’s Iran offensive in the Hormuz Strait

    China faces Trump’s Iran offensive in the Hormuz Strait

    Six weeks into the joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran, a dramatic new escalation by former U.S. President Donald Trump has pushed a long-simmering geopolitical rivalry to the brink of direct superpower conflict. Trump’s recent decision to close the Strait of Hormuz to all commercial ship traffic has left China facing an unprecedented and high-stakes dilemma: comply with the American ban on trade with Tehran, a longstanding strategic partner, or defy the blockade and risk open military confrontation between the world’s two largest nuclear-armed powers.

    Until the blockade was imposed, China had maintained a cautious, distance stance on the ongoing conflict. Beijing publicly criticized the large-scale U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign, noted the Trump administration’s repeated failures to force Iran into submission, and quietly benefited from deeply discounted Iranian crude oil and natural gas shipments that passed unimpeded through the strait to Chinese ports. That quiet balancing act is no longer possible.

    Trump has stated the strait will remain closed to all commercial traffic until every vessel, including those from U.S. Arab allies, is permitted to transit under American terms. For China, maintaining its steady supply of discounted Iranian energy and upholding its decades-long alliance with Tehran now requires directly challenging the U.S. naval blockade.

    Zineb Riboua, a Middle East analyst at the U.S. conservative think tank the Hoover Institute, argues the unfolding crisis is fundamentally rooted in Sino-American competition. Just days after Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched their aerial offensive, Riboua published a report noting that Beijing has invested hundreds of billions of dollars to build Iran into a core strategic asset in the Middle East. “By striking Iran directly, the Trump administration is dismantling – whether by design or by consequence – a pillar of China’s regional architecture,” Riboua wrote.

    The stakes are also personal for the reputations of both Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, who have already been engaged in a gradual, low-intensity confrontation that has rolled back Chinese influence in areas Washington considers critical to its national security. A key precedent came when Trump deployed commandos to Caracas, Venezuela, to arrest then-president Nicolas Maduro on drug trafficking charges. Maduro, who sold oil to China in exchange for military hardware, received no direct intervention from Beijing, a choice that made strategic sense for China at the time: Venezuela only supplied 4% of China’s total oil imports, and the Caribbean falls firmly within the U.S.’s traditional sphere of influence, where China lacks the military capability to challenge American actions.

    Iran is an entirely different proposition. For one, Iran meets 15% of China’s annual fossil fuel demand, all at prices well below the global market average. Beyond energy, Beijing has built a deep strategic partnership with Tehran to develop Iran’s vast rare earth mineral reserves – resources that have become one of the most globally sought-after commodities, due to their non-negotiable role in manufacturing advanced semiconductors. These chips power everything from consumer electronics and artificial intelligence systems to core components of modern military hardware, including the guidance systems for U.S. Tomahawk cruise missiles and the avionics and weapons controls for F-35 fighter jets and armed drones.

    China currently controls roughly 90% of the world’s refined rare earth production, and has long sought to expand its grip on upstream mineral reserves. In 2021, Beijing signed a landmark 25-year agreement to invest $400 billion in Iran’s economy, in exchange for guaranteed long-term access to both Iranian oil and rare earth deposits. Online energy publication OilPrice notes that by positioning itself as a rare earth hub for China, Iran has become far more than just a discounted energy supplier to Beijing. “This gives Xi a reason to view the country as more than a ‘sanctioned’ gas station,” the outlet wrote, adding that the U.S. offensive against Tehran poses a direct threat to this Sino-Iranian resource alliance.

    Beyond energy and minerals, Chinese firms have also played a central role in building and modernizing Iran’s domestic telecommunications and digital surveillance infrastructure. During widespread anti-government protests in Iran earlier this year, the Tehran regime used Chinese-supplied tools including facial recognition cameras to identify, detain and crack down on demonstrators, and deployed China’s “Great Firewall” censorship technology to shut down nationwide internet access to hide evidence of its repression. “Iran has not developed its censorship infrastructure in isolation,” the Washington-based Arab Gulf States Institute (AGSI) wrote in a January report. “The regime has received assistance from China, the world’s most experienced practitioner of internet control.” AGSI added that these Chinese-built systems allow governments to track online users, intercept communications, censor content, and isolate populations during periods of civil unrest.

    All of these Chinese strategic gains, as well as recent diplomatic wins in the region, are now at risk from the U.S.-led offensive. Beijing brokered the historic 2023 reconciliation between long-time regional rivals Iran and Saudi Arabia, welcomed Iran into the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, China’s leading regional security bloc, and extended its signature Belt and Road Initiative through Iran to open new trade routes connecting Chinese goods from Central Asia to the Indian Ocean.

    Since the start of the campaign, Beijing has initially taken a diplomatic, rule-based approach to the crisis. “The sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity of Iran and other regional countries must be respected,” China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong stated. “China stands ready to work with the international community to advance peace efforts and help restore peace and stability in the Middle East at an early date.”

    That diplomatic tone shifted sharply on April 14, the day Trump’s Hormuz blockade took effect. In a defiant public statement, China’s Foreign Ministry made clear it had no intention of backing down: “Chinese ships continue to move in and out of the waters of the Strait of Hormuz. We have trade and energy agreements with Iran, which we will respect and abide by. We expect others not to interfere in our affairs. Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz, and has opened it to us.”

    A direct naval confrontation between two global nuclear superpowers has not occurred since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, when then-U.S. President John F. Kennedy ordered a naval quarantine of Cuba to stop Soviet shipments of nuclear ballistic missiles. War was averted only when Soviet ships turned back, following a secret compromise that saw the U.S. agree to remove its nuclear missiles from NATO member Turkey.

    Now, analysts warn the Hormuz standoff could escalate to open conflict if China follows through on its promise to continue trading with Iran. “Chinese support for a U.S. adversary could directly result in American casualties,” warned Joe Webster, a geopolitical and energy analyst who authors the China-Russia Report blog. “What will be the U.S. response if Chinese military intelligence support for Iran results in the deaths of US airmen or sailors?” It is a question that hangs over the entire Middle East, with global consequences that remain impossible to predict.

  • Man wins €1m Picasso painting in €100 charity raffle

    Man wins €1m Picasso painting in €100 charity raffle

    A lucky Paris-based engineer and lifelong art lover has walked away with a priceless original Pablo Picasso masterpiece, valued at more than €1 million ($1.2 million), after having his name drawn at random from a pool of over 120,000 global participants in a charity fundraising raffle. Fifty-eight-year-old Ari Hodara first learned of his win during a video call with officials from Christie’s Paris auction house on Tuesday, his initial reaction one of healthy skepticism rather than unbridled joy. When informed he was now the owner of the 1941 work by the iconic Spanish modernist, Hodara asked the auction team: “How do I know this isn’t a prank?”

    Organized to accelerate research into Alzheimer’s disease, this year’s raffle sold 120,000+ entries at €100 apiece to buyers across dozens of countries around the world. The draw ultimately generated approximately €11 million in total proceeds, a major milestone for the fundraising initiative that has delivered impactful global grants across its previous two editions.

    This year’s top prize was *Tête de Femme* (Head of a Woman), a gouache-on-paper portrait created in Picasso’s instantly recognizable cubist style that depicts Dora Maar, his partner and frequent creative muse who was a prominent French surrealist artist in her own right. In a post-draw interview with auction staff, Hodara shared his reaction to the life-changing win. “I was surprised, that’s it,” he explained. “When you bet on this, you don’t expect to win… But I’m very happy because I’m very interested in painting, and it’s great news for me.” Hodara purchased his winning ticket — number 94,715 — just days before the draw, after stumbling on information about the raffle by chance over the preceding weekend.

    The charity initiative, dubbed “1 Picasso for 100 euros”, was founded in 2013 by French journalist Peri Cochin, and has received official backing from the Picasso family and the Picasso Foundation throughout its history. Cochin noted that it was an especially happy outcome that the winner was a local Paris resident, eliminating complex international logistics for the handover of the valuable artwork. “It’s going to be very easy for us to deliver the painting, so we’re happy,” she said. The selection of Paris also holds special cultural resonance: the city was Picasso’s primary home and creative base for most of his adult career, and Parisian museums hold thousands of the artist’s works in their permanent collections.

    Of the total funds raised in this year’s draw, €1 million will go to the Opera Gallery, which owned the portrait prior to the raffle. The remainder of the proceeds will be donated to France’s Alzheimer’s Research Foundation to advance clinical and academic research into the neurodegenerative condition. Olivier de Ladoucette, head of the foundation, called the initiative a critical step forward in the global fight against Alzheimer’s. “This Picasso initiative is one more building block so that one day Alzheimer’s will be nothing more than a bad memory,” he told the AFP news agency.

    This year’s draw marks the third installment of the recurring charity event, which has supported different good causes across its history. The inaugural 2013 raffle, which raised funds for preservation work at the UNESCO World Heritage Site of Tyre in Lebanon, awarded the Picasso prize to a 25-year-old participant from Pennsylvania in the United States. The second edition, held in 2020, was won by a 58-year-old Italian accountant after her son gifted her a raffle ticket as a Christmas present. Proceeds from that draw funded public sanitation infrastructure projects in schools and rural communities across Cameroon, Madagascar and Morocco.

  • Swiss travel retailer Avolta marks a new chapter in the Chinese market

    Swiss travel retailer Avolta marks a new chapter in the Chinese market

    Global travel retail and food and beverage leader Avolta, headquartered in Switzerland, has made its first exhibition appearance at the 2026 China International Consumer Products Expo (CICPE) held in Haikou, marking the start of a fresh, ambitious phase for the firm’s 16-year operation in the Chinese market.

    With a footprint spanning 70 countries, Avolta runs a diverse portfolio that includes duty-free shops, convenience retail outlets, and food and beverage locations around the world. In an exclusive interview with China Daily on the sidelines of the expo, Michael Wong, Avolta’s Managing Director for North Asia, highlighted that the CICPE offers an unmatched platform to demonstrate the company’s full global capabilities and deepen collaborative ties with domestic partners, particularly in China’s Hainan province.

    “We are pleased to be participating in this year’s expo for the first time as an exhibitor,” Wong stated. “It provides an important platform to present Avolta’s capabilities, strengthen relationships across the industry, and support closer connections between brands, partners, and markets.”

    Avolta’s journey in China dates back more than 16 years, with existing operations spread across major transportation hubs and cities including Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport, Chongqing, Shenzhen and Wuhan. Earlier this year, the firm marked a historic breakthrough when it secured the bid to launch new duty-free operations at Shanghai Pudong International Airport’s Terminal 1 and Satellite Terminal 1. This win is notable as it marks the first time in 26 years that an international operator has won such a large-scale duty-free tender in China’s key airport sector.

    Wong described the tender victory as a major milestone and the solid cornerstone for all of Avolta’s future business expansion across China. During the 2026 CICPE, the company took the opportunity to launch a key customer initiative: Club Avolta, its first global loyalty program. The program enables registered members to earn and redeem rewards across both retail and food and beverage outlets at more than 5,100 Avolta locations worldwide. To mark its expo debut, all new sign-ups from CICPE visitors receive complimentary automatic upgrades to gold membership, jumping directly from the standard entry-level silver tier.

    In addition to the loyalty program launch, Avolta also presented a carefully curated exhibition of top-selling products sourced from 12 of its key global markets, including Italy, France, Switzerland, and Japan, giving Chinese consumers and industry partners a first-hand look at the breadth of its global supply network.

    When discussing growth prospects in Hainan, Wong emphasized that Avolta sees strong, long-term potential in the region, driven by China’s Hainan Free Trade Port policy and the recent implementation of visa-free entry policies for international visitors that have already spurred a sharp rise in international tourist arrivals. The company is actively exploring collaborative opportunities across the island and stands ready to scale up its footprint the moment market conditions align for expansion.

    “We are very determined to grow in China in the long term, and we want to stay,” Wong said. “When the opportunity comes, we’re ready.”

    Beyond its core mission of bringing premium international brands to Chinese consumers and travelers, Avolta has also outlined a secondary strategic goal: supporting high-quality Chinese brands to access global markets through the company’s extensive international retail network, positioning itself as a two-way bridge connecting the Chinese market with global consumer markets.

    The 2026 China International Consumer Products Expo runs through Saturday in Haikou, Hainan, attracting hundreds of global brands and industry players from across the world seeking to tap into China’s growing consumer demand.

  • Hainan Expo: Why the world comes

    Hainan Expo: Why the world comes

    As one of China’s most anticipated high-profile consumer trade events of 2026, the China International Consumer Products Expo held in southern China’s Hainan Province has emerged as a powerful global gathering, attracting more than 3,400 brands spanning over 60 countries and regions around the world. For years, this annual expo has carved out a unique niche as a gateway for international brands to access China’s vast, rapidly evolving consumer market, and the 2026 iteration has reinforced its reputation as a can’t-miss event for global merchants looking to expand their footprint in Asia and beyond.

    The question on many industry observers’ minds this year is simple: what continues to make this Hainan-based expo such an irresistible draw for businesses across every consumer sector, from luxury goods to sustainable consumer tech, from artisanal food products to cutting-edge home goods? To unpack the appeal of the expo for global participants, China Daily sent correspondent Xia Ji to connect with international exhibitors on the ground, capturing unfiltered insights into what drives brands to commit time, resources, and exhibition space to the Hainan event year after year.

    Against a backdrop of shifting global trade dynamics and growing demand for access to China’s 1.4 billion consumers, the Hainan Expo has positioned itself as more than just a trade show. It serves as a platform for cross-border cultural exchange, partnership building, and trend forecasting, giving small and medium-sized international brands as well as multinational corporations the opportunity to connect directly with Chinese distributors, consumers, and industry leaders. This combination of market access, networking opportunities, and policy support for foreign businesses in Hainan’s free trade port framework has turned the expo into a magnet for global commerce, solidifying its status as a key annual event on the global trade calendar. The 2026 edition’s high participation rate, with more global brands joining than many previous iterations, signals sustained international confidence in China’s consumer market and the long-term value of the Hainan Expo as a trade catalyst.