作者: admin

  • ‘If I don’t work, I go hungry’: The migrant workers risking their lives to keep the Gulf running

    ‘If I don’t work, I go hungry’: The migrant workers risking their lives to keep the Gulf running

    As Iranian missiles strike the Gulf region, the area’s vast migrant workforce continues laboring under dangerous conditions with minimal protection. Delivery riders, cleaners, construction workers, and security personnel—primarily from Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, and other developing nations—find themselves on the frontlines of a conflict they didn’t create.

    Despite escalating violence that has killed at least 12 civilians across Gulf states (all migrant workers from South Asia), these essential workers report receiving no safety guidance, shelter information, or evacuation support. According to Equidem, a human rights organization with investigators across the region, migrant workers experience universal trauma and panic while being systematically excluded from official safety measures.

    Executive Director Mustafa Qadri identifies two forms of discrimination: exclusion from safety communications and structural discrimination that forces workers to continue working during attacks. ‘There is a conscious choice made to get workers from relatively poor countries,’ Qadri explains, ‘because they’re less likely to complain or demand protection.’

    Delivery riders working for major platforms in the UAE describe continuing to work through attacks with no instruction or choice. ‘I came here to earn money, and working in any situation has become a necessity,’ one Pakistani driver told Middle East Eye. ‘If I do not work, I may go hungry.’

    Paradoxically, these workers face increased demand for their services as wealthier residents shelter indoors, relying on delivery apps for basic necessities. Some riders report better tips but describe relentless workloads and empty roads as they move toward danger while others flee.

    The crisis highlights historical failures by sending countries—including Nepal, Kenya, India, Bangladesh, and Ethiopia—to provide meaningful consular support. Meanwhile, workers on US and Western military bases face particular vulnerability, as standard procedures typically evacuate Western civilians while essential services continue to be run by migrant workers who remain behind.

    Migrant workers have also become primary witnesses to the attacks, with much visual documentation circulating online captured on their phones. This has led to arrests, with Bahrain detaining five Pakistani and one Bangladeshi worker for allegedly praising Iranian strikes while filming aftermath footage.

    The emotional toll remains largely unaddressed. As one shopkeeper in Qatar noted, ‘Mental health is passive. It’s about being prepared and navigating this if it prolongs. Spending 15 minutes of our day worrying about falling shrapnel is something people have made peace with.’

  • New US ambassador to South Africa summoned over ‘undiplomatic remarks’

    New US ambassador to South Africa summoned over ‘undiplomatic remarks’

    South Africa has formally summoned US Ambassador Leo Brent Bozell III following controversial remarks he made about the anti-apartheid chant ‘Kill The Boer,’ creating a significant diplomatic rift between the two nations. The newly appointed ambassador, who assumed his position last month, sparked outrage by challenging a South African Constitutional Court ruling that had previously determined the chant does not constitute hate speech.

    The diplomatic confrontation unfolded after Bozell addressed a business gathering in Hermanus on Tuesday, where he presented five areas requiring improvement in South Africa. His comments regarding the judicial system’s handling of the contentious chant were particularly inflammatory, with the ambassador stating he ‘did not care what the courts said’—a remark perceived as disrespecting the country’s legal institutions.

    South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation issued a formal demarche, expressing the government’s severe disapproval of Bozell’s ‘undiplomatic’ statements. Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola emphasized the reciprocal nature of US-South Africa relations, noting that South African companies maintain substantial investments in the United States.

    Following the diplomatic summons, Bozell issued a clarification and apology on Wednesday. Zane Dangor, Director-General of International Relations, confirmed the ambassador had expressed regret that his comments ‘detracted from any impression that he wanted to work with us constructively.’ Bozell subsequently affirmed that ‘the US government respects the independence of South Africa’s judiciary.’

    This incident occurs against a backdrop of deteriorating relations since President Donald Trump took office. Tensions have escalated over multiple issues including trade policies, diplomatic approaches, and South Africa’s strategic partnerships. Trump has repeatedly criticized President Cyril Ramaphosa’s administration, accusing it of failing to protect white minorities and questioning land reform initiatives.

    Conversely, South Africa has condemned the US decision to prioritize refugee applications from white Afrikaners, maintaining that claims of ‘white genocide’ lack credible evidence. The relationship further strained last year when the US imposed unprecedented tariffs on South African goods, the highest among African nations.

  • Israel to build base in Somaliland to target Houthis, says report

    Israel to build base in Somaliland to target Houthis, says report

    Israel is actively considering the establishment of a strategic military installation in Somaliland to enhance its operational capabilities against Yemen’s Houthi forces, according to a Bloomberg investigation. This development follows Israel’s groundbreaking diplomatic recognition of Somaliland as a sovereign state in December—making it the first nation to extend such acknowledgment.

    Anonymous Somaliland officials revealed that the proposed facility would serve dual purposes: intelligence gathering and direct military operations targeting Houthi positions. The strategic location, approximately 260 kilometers from Yemen across the Gulf of Aden, offers geographical advantages for regional security operations.

    Preparatory activities have already commenced, with Israeli security delegations conducting coastal surveys along Somaliland’s shoreline in June to identify suitable locations. Concurrently, Israel has secured blast-resistant facilities in Hargeisa’s hotels while scouting for permanent diplomatic premises.

    Somaliland’s Minister of the Presidency, Khadar Hussein Abdi, confirmed the evolving security partnership, stating: “We will have a strategic relationship that encompasses many dimensions. While military base discussions remain preliminary, comprehensive analysis will undoubtedly occur.”

    The timing of this initiative coincides with heightened regional tensions. The Houthi movement, aligned with Iran, has previously launched missile and drone attacks against international shipping routes and Israeli territory in solidarity with Palestinians during the Gaza conflict. Israeli military officials have established specialized intelligence units dedicated to monitoring the Houthis, whom they consider among Israel’s most significant security threats.

    This strategic partnership also intersects with complex regional dynamics. The United Arab Emirates maintains substantial infrastructure in Somaliland, including a military airstrip and port operations managed by DP World. Somalia’s federal government has previously severed ties with the UAE over these developments, while both Somaliland and Puntland administrations rejected Mogadishu’s objections.

    The geopolitical implications extend beyond immediate security concerns, potentially reshaping diplomatic recognition patterns and regional alliance structures in the Horn of Africa and Arabian Peninsula.

  • US dropped charges against Turkey’s Halkbank in Hamas hostage deal, court documents show

    US dropped charges against Turkey’s Halkbank in Hamas hostage deal, court documents show

    In a landmark decision with significant geopolitical implications, the United States Justice Department has formally abandoned its multi-billion dollar prosecution against Türkiye’s Halkbank. The case, which alleged massive sanctions evasion on behalf of Iran, was terminated following Ankara’s crucial role in securing the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas in 2025, according to legal documents filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

    The judicial proceedings, initiated in 2019, accused the Turkish state-owned financial institution of orchestrating a sophisticated scheme involving fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy. Prosecutors contended that Halkbank facilitated the covert transfer of approximately $20 billion in restricted Iranian assets, orchestrated the conversion of oil revenues into gold and cash, and fabricated documentation for nonexistent food shipments to legitimize illicit financial flows through entities in Iran, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates.

    Under a deferred prosecution agreement endorsed by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton, all charges will be dismissed contingent upon the bank implementing comprehensive internal reforms. Notably, the settlement imposes no financial penalties or administrative fines on Halkbank, as confirmed in the institution’s official statement.

    This resolution underscores the strengthened diplomatic alignment between Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and U.S. leadership, with sources indicating former President Trump pledged to resolve the matter amicably. Court documents dated March 6, 2026, reveal the settlement was directly intertwined with high-stakes diplomatic negotiations concerning the Gaza conflict. The filing specifically acknowledges the involvement of Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in multilateral efforts that ultimately yielded a ceasefire agreement and hostage release following the protracted hostilities initiated by the October 2023 terror attacks.

    The judicial documentation states: ‘The national security and foreign policy interests furthered by the Agreement are unique and extraordinary… serving as an important component of multilateral international efforts to secure the release of dozens of living hostages and hostage remains.’ It further emphasizes that the U.S. commitment to resolving the Halkbank case was a pivotal element in obtaining Türkiye’s instrumental assistance. The agreement is anticipated to receive formal court approval in an upcoming hearing.

  • US energy chief’s deleted Hormuz X post called market manipulation

    US energy chief’s deleted Hormuz X post called market manipulation

    US Energy Secretary Chris Wright, a former fracking executive, faces allegations of market manipulation after posting and swiftly deleting a false claim about naval operations in the Strait of Hormuz. On Tuesday, Wright asserted on social media platform X that the American Navy had “successfully escorted an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz to ensure oil remains flowing.”

    The post triggered immediate market reactions, with oil prices experiencing their most dramatic plunge in years according to Wall Street Journal reports. The Energy Department subsequently attributed the misinformation to staff who “incorrectly captioned” the post, while White House officials publicly acknowledged the statement’s inaccuracy. This incident occurs amid escalating tensions following the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran, which has threatened global oil supplies.

    Hedge fund manager Spencer Hakimian questioned the financial implications, asking: “So who just made $100 million dollars shorting oil for the three minutes that Chris Wright had that post up?” The controversy drew international condemnation, with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accusing US officials of “posting fake news to manipulate markets.”

    Contrary to Wright’s deleted assertion, Reuters confirmed that the US Navy has consistently denied escort requests through the critical waterway due to heightened security risks. The strategic Strait of Hormuz handles approximately 31% of global seaborne crude oil, transporting 13 million barrels daily. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have explicitly threatened vessels associated with nations attacking Iran, creating unprecedented market uncertainty that analysts compare to historical oil crises combined.

    The situation intensified as UK Maritime Trade Operations reported a cargo vessel struck by an unknown projectile in the strait, forcing crew evacuation. Simultaneously, the US military claimed to have eliminated multiple Iranian naval vessels, including minelayers near the strategic passage. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) revealed after a classified briefing that the administration “had no plan” for securing the strait despite the predictable consequences of military action against Iran.

  • US will permanently close the consulate in Peshawar, Pakistan, its closest mission to Afghanistan

    US will permanently close the consulate in Peshawar, Pakistan, its closest mission to Afghanistan

    The United States Department of State has announced the permanent closure of its diplomatic consulate in Peshawar, Pakistan, marking the first overseas mission shuttered under the administration’s comprehensive reorganization plan. Located strategically near the Afghan border, this consulate served as a critical operational hub during multiple phases of U.S. involvement in Afghanistan since the 2001 invasion.

    According to official congressional notification documents obtained by The Associated Press, the closure decision results from a year-long review process and is projected to generate annual savings of $7.5 million. The State Department emphasized that this diplomatic consolidation will not impair America’s ability to protect its national interests within Pakistan.

    The Peshawar mission currently employs 107 personnel, including 18 American diplomats and government officials alongside 89 local staff members. The shutdown process will require approximately $3 million in implementation costs, with a significant portion ($1.8 million) allocated for relocating armored trailers that functioned as temporary office structures. Remaining resources will facilitate the transfer of vehicle fleets, telecommunications infrastructure, and office equipment to the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad and consulates in Karachi and Lahore.

    Despite its historical significance as a logistical gateway to Afghanistan and contact point for American citizens and Afghan nationals, consular services will transition to the Islamabad embassy located 184 kilometers away. The department confirmed that the closure is unrelated to recent regional tensions surrounding Iran, which temporarily suspended operations at multiple U.S. diplomatic facilities in Pakistan.

    This action follows broader staffing reductions within the State Department, including substantial cuts to diplomatic personnel and the restructuring of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

  • US has ‘no plan’ for Iran war and Strait of Hormuz, senators say after briefing

    US has ‘no plan’ for Iran war and Strait of Hormuz, senators say after briefing

    In a striking display of bipartisan concern, Democratic senators emerged from a confidential briefing on Tuesday to condemn the Trump administration’s apparent lack of strategic planning for the ongoing conflict with Iran. The two-hour session with the Senate Armed Services Committee revealed what lawmakers described as a dangerously incoherent approach to one of America’s most significant military engagements.

    The briefing exposed critical gaps in strategic thinking across multiple fronts, including the vital Strait of Hormuz—the world’s most crucial energy chokepoint—as well as questions regarding regime change and handling Iran’s nuclear program. Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland characterized the administration’s position as demonstrating ‘complete incoherence,’ mirroring concerns already circulating in public discourse.

    Multiple senators revealed that administration officials explicitly stated the war aims did not include destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities or effecting regime change. Instead, according to Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, the objectives appeared limited to ‘destroying lots of missiles and boats and drone factories’—a approach he warned could lead to ‘endless war’ as Iran inevitably rebuilds its capabilities.

    Perhaps most alarmingly, Murphy disclosed that administration officials admitted having ‘NO PLAN’ for resolving the critical situation at the Strait of Hormuz, acknowledging they lacked a strategy to safely reopen this essential global energy artery despite the crisis being ‘100 percent foreseeable.’

    The senators further questioned the legitimacy of the conflict’s foundation. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren declared the ‘illegal war is based on lies and was launched without any imminent threat to our nation,’ noting Trump ‘has not given a single clear reason for the war and has no plan to end it.’

    The briefing also revealed troubling motivations behind the conflict. Van Hollen suggested the administration was effectively executing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s long-standing desire to attack Iran, quoting Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s March remarks about Netanyahu’s decision to strike. This perspective was bolstered by Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli diplomat, who told Middle East Eye that Netanyahu had been ‘trying to co-opt and manipulate Trump into a major war for the last year’ for political reasons.

    The decision to engage in conflict has created divisions within Trump’s base and administration, with figures like Tucker Carlson viewing it as a betrayal of ‘America First’ principles, while officials including Jared Kushner and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have adopted more aggressive postures.

  • F1 Chinese Grand Prix returns with major upgrades

    F1 Chinese Grand Prix returns with major upgrades

    Shanghai International Circuit prepares to host the highly anticipated return of Formula 1 racing to China from March 13-15, 2026, marking the second round of a transformed championship season. The event signals both F1’s commitment to the Chinese market and the debut of sweeping technical regulations that promise to reshape competitive dynamics.

    The 2026 season introduces the most significant technical overhaul in recent Formula 1 history, featuring dramatically redesigned vehicles that are 32 kilograms lighter with advanced active aerodynamics. The revolutionary power units now operate with an equal 50-50 power distribution between internal combustion and electric systems, representing a major step toward sustainable racing technology.

    Adding to the season’s novelty, the grid expands to accommodate the all-new Cadillac Formula 1 Team as the championship’s eleventh constructor. The American manufacturer’s entry carries particular significance for Chinese motorsport enthusiasts as hometown hero Zhou Guanyu joins the team as reserve driver, maintaining Chinese representation in the elite racing series.

    Event organizer Juss Sports anticipates unprecedented competitive uncertainty. “Whether through the entry of a new team or innovations in technology and regulations, it will inject greater uncertainty and excitement into the race,” stated Zhang Weiyao, Deputy General Manager of Juss Sports. He emphasized that the Chinese Grand Prix would serve as “an important window for global auto fans to observe the latest developments in the sport.”

    The Shanghai International Circuit, which last hosted Formula 1 in 2019, undergoes final preparations to accommodate the new technical specifications and safety requirements. The return to China after a seven-year absence underscores both the country’s importance in the global automotive industry and its growing influence in international motorsport.

  • France flanker Jégou hit with four-week ban for reckless eye contact in Six Nations

    France flanker Jégou hit with four-week ban for reckless eye contact in Six Nations

    In a significant disciplinary ruling from Dublin, French rugby flanker Oscar Jégou has received a four-week suspension for making reckless contact with the eyes of Scottish opponent Ewan Ashman. The incident occurred during a maul in last weekend’s intense Six Nations clash at Murrayfield, which concluded with a surprising 50-40 victory for Scotland over France.

    Although match officials did not penalize Jégou during the game, video evidence subsequently revealed the concerning infringement. Following a formal citing process, a disciplinary panel convened to review the matter thoroughly. The hearing was notably delayed by 24 hours to incorporate ‘reckless’ as a specific descriptor in the charge, which was ultimately upheld by the judicial body.

    The independent panel determined that Jégou’s actions constituted foul play serious enough to warrant a red card had it been identified during match proceedings. In considering the appropriate sanction, the committee noted that Ashman sustained no physical injury from the encounter, resulting in a baseline suspension of six weeks. This penalty was subsequently reduced by two weeks due to Jégou’s demonstrated good conduct throughout the process and his previously clean disciplinary record.

    As a consequence of this ruling, Jégou will be unavailable for France’s final Six Nations match against England this Saturday in Paris. Additionally, the suspension extends to his club commitments, requiring him to miss three upcoming games for Top 14 side La Rochelle.

  • Spain decides to withdraw ambassador to Israel

    Spain decides to withdraw ambassador to Israel

    In a significant escalation of diplomatic tensions, Spain has formally withdrawn its ambassador to Israel indefinitely. The Official State Gazette confirmed on Wednesday that Ambassador Ana Maria Salomon Perez has been recalled from Tel Aviv, with the Spanish embassy now to be led by a charge d’affaires—mirroring the level of diplomatic representation maintained by Israel in Madrid.

    This decisive action represents the latest development in a deteriorating relationship between the two nations that has intensified since Israel’s military operations in Gaza commenced in October 2023. Under Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s leadership, Spain has emerged as Europe’s most vocal critic of Israel’s conduct, which Madrid has consistently characterized as genocide.

    The diplomatic rift has deepened through several consequential moves by Spain. In 2024, Spain extended formal recognition to Palestinian statehood, prompting Israel to recall its ambassador from Madrid. The following year, Spain implemented restrictions prohibiting ships and aircraft transporting weapons to Israel from utilizing Spanish ports or airspace.

    Tensions further escalated when Sanchez openly rejected US President Donald Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ proposal for Gaza in January, denouncing the plan as contrary to international law and criticizing its exclusion of the Palestinian Authority.

    The current diplomatic crisis has been compounded by recent disagreements over the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran. Sanchez has vehemently criticized the operation as illegal and refused American requests to utilize jointly operated military bases in southern Spain for operations connected to strikes on Iran.

    This refusal triggered a public confrontation with President Trump, who accused Spain of adopting an ‘unfriendly’ posture and threatened trade repercussions. In a televised address on March 4th, Sanchez defended Spain’s position with a simple declaration: ‘No to war.’

    The Spanish leader articulated a principled stance grounded in historical awareness and international legal frameworks. ‘One illegality cannot be met with another, because that is how humanity’s great disasters begin,’ Sanchez stated. ‘We must learn from history and cannot play Russian roulette with the destiny of millions of people.’

    Sanchez emphasized Spain’s commitment to ‘the founding principles of the European Union, the Charter of the United Nations, and international law,’ positioning the nation as a defender of peaceful coexistence between countries amid escalating global tensions.