作者: admin

  • ‘Major asset’: Dragons sign Scott Drinkwater for the next three years leaving a veteran without a clear role for 2027

    ‘Major asset’: Dragons sign Scott Drinkwater for the next three years leaving a veteran without a clear role for 2027

    The National Rugby League (NRL) has been rocked by a major offseason roster move, with St George Illawarra Dragons securing the signature of elite Cowboys fullback Scott Drinkwater on a three-year contract starting in 2027. The deal, confirmed by both clubs in late April 2026, ends weeks of intense transfer speculation and triggers cascading position changes across two teams.

    After weeks of widespread rumors linking Drinkwater to a move south to the Dragons, North Queensland Cowboys formally agreed on Saturday to release the 28-year-old from the final year of his existing contract, clearing the way for the official announcement. The timing of the deal comes off a career-defining performance from Drinkwater: just one day before the agreement, the dynamic fullback notched one try and three assists in a dominant home victory over the Cronulla Sharks, underscoring his top form ahead of the move.

    In a statement following the signing, Drinkwater expressed his enthusiasm for the next chapter of his career. “I’m really looking forward to joining the Dragons and being part of what the club is building,” he said. “You can see the young talent from the area making its way through the ranks, so it’s an exciting challenge to go on this journey with them. I look forward to finishing strong at the Cowboys this year and then arriving at the Dragons for 2027 to do everything I can to contribute to the team’s success.”

    For the Dragons, the signing fills a long-standing gap in the club’s attacking lineup. Drinkwater’s signature creativity and elite ball-handling skills from the fullback position add the attacking spark the franchise has lacked for multiple seasons, and he joins recently signed forward Keaon Koloamatangi as a key foundational recruit for the incoming full-time head coach set to replace interim leader Shane Flanagan. The official Dragons NRL account welcomed Drinkwater to the club with a social media announcement alongside a graphic introducing the new recruit.

    Dragons chief executive Tim Watsford emphasized the high value the club places on the new signing. “Scott is a player of genuine class in our competition, and we’re thrilled to have him commit to the Dragons from 2027,” Watsford said. “He brings proven NRL experience, composure, skill and an attacking instinct that will be a major asset for our club. Importantly, we believe Scott will fit strongly with our playing group both on and off the field.”

    The blockbuster signing immediately prompts questions about the future of incumbent Dragons fullback Clint Gutherson, who is currently under contract through 2026. To accommodate Drinkwater’s arrival in the fullback role starting 2027, Gutherson will need to transition to a new position, most likely centre or five-eighth, opening up a key position shift for the veteran back.

    For the Cowboys, Drinkwater’s departure creates an unexpected opportunity for rising club talent. Young gun fullback Jaxon Purdue is now set to step into the starting fullback role for the 2027 season, giving the dynamic, promising playmaker expanded space to showcase his explosive running game and cement his place in the NRL.

    Cowboys chief executive Micheal Luck paid tribute to Drinkwater’s eight-year tenure with the North Queensland franchise, noting that the club could not match the long-term contract offer extended by the Dragons. “Scott has been not just a valued member of our club, but a wonderful member of the North Queensland community since he arrived eight years ago,” Luck said. “Scott received a long-term offer from another club, which we were not in the position to match. He remains an integral member of our squad for the remainder of the 2026 season. We wish Scott and his young family the very best in their next adventure. They will always be welcome at our club.”

    The official announcement of the signing was made just hours before the Dragons’ high-stakes clash with the Sydney Roosters, drawing major attention from NRL fans and analysts across the country ahead of the blockbuster match.

  • Katya Adler: Europe’s Nato allies push back at reported US threat to Spain

    Katya Adler: Europe’s Nato allies push back at reported US threat to Spain

    When European Union leaders gathered in Cyprus this week, they arrived intending to hash out pragmatic policy priorities, most notably the bloc’s next multiyear budget. Instead, they found themselves confronting yet another simmering transatlantic crisis that has laid bare deep fractures between the United States and its European allies – a rift that experts and leaders warn threatens the very foundation of the post-WWII collective defence order.

    The catalyst for the latest standoff was a leaked internal Pentagon email, first reported by Reuters Friday, that outlined potential punitive measures against Nato allies who refused to back the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran. Most alarmingly, the document floated the idea of suspending Spain from the 32-member defensive alliance over Madrid’s public opposition to the offensive.

    Under Nato’s founding treaties, however, no mechanism exists to expel or suspend a member state. Any attempt to block Spain from occupying key civilian or military alliance roles, another potential penalty cited in the leak, would require unanimous approval from all Nato members – a step that all but guarantees rejection, given the swift, unified pushback from European leaders this week.

    Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, who has been one of the most vocal critics of the U.S.-Israeli strikes, struck a measured tone as he arrived at the summit, telling reporters simply: “We are fulfilling our obligations toward Nato.” Later, he dismissed the leaked email as an unauthorised document, noting Madrid conducts its diplomacy based on official U.S. government positions, not unsourced internal correspondence.

    Sanchez’s defiance has long rankled the Trump administration: he was the only Nato leader to refuse Trump’s demand that members boost defence spending to 5% of GDP, and he immediately blocked U.S. forces from accessing shared U.S.-Spanish military bases for operations against Iran, earning earlier threats of U.S. trade sanctions.

    Fellow European leaders were quick to rally to Spain’s side. Dutch Prime Minister Rob Jetten said he wanted to be “crystal clear” that Spain is and will remain a full Nato member, adding that European contributions to strengthening the alliance directly serve U.S. security interests. A senior German official echoed the sentiment, saying “Spain is a member of Nato. And I see no reason why that should change.”

    Even Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, once widely viewed as a pro-Trump ally and a potential bridge between Europe and Washington, joined the criticism, describing the rising tensions between the U.S. and Madrid as “not at all positive.” Meloni has herself fallen out of favour with Trump in recent months: she denied U.S. forces permission to use the Sigonella airbase in Sicily for Iran operations, and called Trump’s derogatory remarks about the Pope “unacceptable.” Trump responded publicly by branding Meloni herself unacceptable, ending their once-close political alliance.

    The leaked email also targeted another Nato ally, the United Kingdom, proposing a review of Washington’s position on the UK’s sovereignty over the Falkland Islands – a territory also claimed by Argentina. The move comes amid lingering tension between Trump and British Prime Keir Starmer, who initially denied Trump’s request to use British military bases for February strikes on Iran. Though the UK has since allowed limited base access and participated in drone interception missions, Starmer has refused to deepen UK involvement in the conflict or back the U.S. port blockade on Iran, drawing repeated verbal attacks from Trump.

    Beyond the immediate threats against Spain and the UK, the leak has laid bare a growing crisis of confidence in the transatlantic alliance that experts say poses existential risk to Nato. Former Nato Assistant Secretary General for Defence Investment Camille Grande, now head of ASD Europe, said the leak reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of how the alliance works on the part of the Trump administration.

    “The defence alliance is based on consensus; not run by the United States,” Grande explained. He compared Trump’s approach to that of a landlord seeking to evict tenants who do not pay what he deems sufficient rent, stressing that “Nato is not Trump’s building.”

    French President Emmanuel Macron went even further, accusing Trump of deliberately “hollowing out” Nato through repeated public attacks on the alliance. Trump has repeatedly called Nato a “paper tiger” and a “one-way street” that benefits Europe at U.S. expense, writing on social media recently that “We will protect them, but they will do nothing for us.”

    These public divisions have sparked deep anxiety among eastern European Nato members that have long relied on U.S. security guarantees to deter Russian expansionism. Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine is now entering its fourth year, and the country’s war economy is growing, fueled by high global oil prices spurred by the current crisis around the Strait of Hormuz. Dutch military intelligence this week warned that once the conflict in Ukraine concludes, Moscow could be ready to launch a limited regional conflict against Nato within 12 months, aiming to divide the alliance politically through limited territorial gains and nuclear coercion.

    That threat has left eastern allies questioning whether the U.S. would honour its Article 5 commitment to defend any attacked member. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a longstanding transatlanticist, openly raised that question this week. Even Estonia, a small Baltic state that spends heavily on defence and has long been courted by Trump, was left feeling vulnerable this week after the Pentagon delayed delivery of six contracted High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) to meet U.S. operational needs for the Iran war – a capability the U.S. itself called the most significant upgrade in Estonian military history.

    The Trump administration has openly framed its approach as dividing allies into a tiered system of “good guys” and “bad guys.” In a December speech, U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said model allies that fully back U.S. priorities would receive special favours, while those that do not would face consequences.

    But former U.S. ambassador to Nato Julianne Smith, now president of Clarion Strategies, said punitive threats against European allies are entirely overreactive. “The President is obviously upset by Europeans that failed to fully support the US war in Iran. But punitive measures like removing force posture in Spain seem over-reactive in light of the fact that allies were never asked to assist the US and Trump has frequently denied that the US actually needed European support,” she noted. She added that new threats come as the transatlantic relationship is already reeling from Trump’s stated policy to seize Greenland from Nato member Denmark, and could deliver a devastating blow ahead of the alliance’s July summit.

    Alarmed by the growing uncertainty over Nato’s reliability under the Trump administration, some EU leaders at the Cyprus summit floated the idea of activating the bloc’s own mutual defence clause, Article 42.7, as a potential backstop should Nato’s Article 5 prove unworkable. But European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the guardian of EU treaties, acknowledged the clause leaves critical details undefined: while it requires member states to come to each other’s aid, it offers no clarity on when activation is appropriate or what specific actions each member must take.

    Caught between domestic public opposition to Trump’s Iran policy and the need to maintain working security and economic ties with Washington, many European nations are moving forward with independent plans to deploy international maritime patrols and mine-clearing operations in the Strait of Hormuz once hostilities end, in a bid to ease tensions with the U.S. France has pushed to exclude the U.S. from these discussions, though the UK has reportedly pushed for U.S. involvement.

    Former Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg warned this week that the mounting tensions put the alliance’s long-term survival in question, saying its existence cannot be guaranteed a decade from now. Still, he argued that Nato’s survival remains a core U.S. national interest: together, the U.S. and Nato allies account for 50% of global GDP and 50% of global military capability, giving the U.S. a network of global partners that rival powers Russia and China lack.

    Stoltenberg pushed back on claims that Europe has broadly abandoned the U.S. over Iran, noting that most allies have provided quiet logistical support for operations, with only a handful of public dissenters. He also warned against Trump’s description of Nato as a paper tiger, stressing that alliances are rendered useless when they are undermined and attacked from within by their own members.

    For European leaders, the core dispute with Washington is not whether Iran poses a threat to global security, but how to address that threat. European governments broadly favour diplomatic engagement and targeted sanctions over the unilateral military offensive launched by the U.S. and Israel, which they view as an unnecessary war of choice that has destabilized global energy markets and increased the risk of a broader regional conflict.

  • Palestine Action defendants targeted Elbit’s use of ‘deadly AI’, court hears

    Palestine Action defendants targeted Elbit’s use of ‘deadly AI’, court hears

    On Friday, a high-profile trial at London’s Woolwich Crown Court heard gripping testimony from six Palestine Action activists charged with criminal damage over an August 2024 break-in at a Bristol-area Elbit Systems facility, with defendants centering their defense on the Israeli arms manufacturer’s development of AI-powered weapons deployed against Palestinian civilians.

    The six defendants — Leona Kamio, 30, Charlotte Head, 29, Jordan Devlin, 31, Fatema Rajwani, 21, Zoe Rogers, 22, and Samuel Corner, 23 — all stand accused of vandalism and trespassing stemming from the early-morning incursion into Elbit’s Filton research and development factory, located just outside Bristol in western England.

    Taking the witness stand Friday, Rogers, a north London resident with diagnosed autism and ADHD, told the court she and Kamio targeted factory computer systems specifically because of Elbit’s documented work on AI tools that enable more precise targeting of civilians in conflict zones. She explained that the Filton site is not a general manufacturing facility, but a core R&D hub advancing cutting-edge weapons technology for the Israeli government, including AI-driven decision support and targeting systems. Publicly available information on Elbit’s own website confirms the state-owned Israeli firm’s development of world-leading AI-powered decision support systems, built on decades of specialized experience in military simulation and weapons technology.

    In his afternoon testimony, Devlin — a product designer from Ballymena, Northern Ireland — echoed Rogers’ framing, calling Elbit’s AI tools the most lethal component of the company’s weapons arsenal. He argued that disrupting the early development stage of these systems would prevent countless future civilian deaths. “If you can disable these AI systems while they are still being refined, you are directly saving lives,” Devlin told the jury. Rogers added that the group’s core goal entering the facility was to disable Elbit’s “killer drones” and save as many civilian lives as possible, telling the court: “I remember destroying weapons used to kill children.”

    Rogers told the court she had reviewed public footage of Elbit’s Thor BTOL quadcopter drone, a model the company produces that has been openly deployed in the Gaza Strip, where it is used to drop grenades on civilian populations. Rajwani, Rogers’ co-defendant, confirmed Friday that she specifically targeted Elbit’s quadcopter drones during the incursion, saying: “This is a weapon I knew would kill or injure children. My specific intention was to dismantle drones and other weaponry, and I damaged computer systems along with drone components.”

    The trial this week has shown jurors raw on-site footage of the incursion, capturing violent confrontations between the activists, on-site security guards and responding police officers. During the clashes, multiple defendants suffered injuries after being hit with a sledgehammer, struck by police tasers, and sprayed with Pava, a potent synthetic pepper spray authorized for UK law enforcement use. Jurors have also heard details of encounters between defendants and security: footage shown Friday captured on-site guard Angelo Volante shouting at Rajwani and Head to “get on the floor.” Rajwani, a Tanzanian-born British student who works four part-time jobs, told the court the encounter left lasting psychological trauma: “Volante is one of the scariest people I have ever encountered. I still have nightmares about his shouting.”

    After her initial arrest for the break-in, Rajwani told the court she was subsequently re-arrested on terrorism offenses. As a visibly Muslim woman of color who grew up in the UK, she described overwhelming fear following the second arrest: “I grew up hearing what terrorism charges mean for people like me. I associate that label with torture and unfair trials. I was terrified I would never get out of custody.” Rajwani added that she brought a GoPro camera to the factory to both document Elbit’s weapons development and live broadcast the action to global audiences.

    Rogers, who shared autism and ADHD diagnoses with Corner, told the court she joined Palestine Action after embracing the group’s model of direct action — creating change directly rather than lobbying government officials for reform. Her defense attorney Audrey Cherryl Mogan presented a 2023 Palestine Action document prepared to train activists for the risk of imprisonment, which reads: “Becoming a prisoner for taking action against Israel’s arms trade is proof of causing significant costs to the arms industry and its protector, the imperial British state. In a neutered, pacified society that tolerates a business model built on the genocide of Palestinian people, taking action is not only crucial, but a rare act of meaningful solidarity.” Rogers confirmed she shared this core belief, though she told the court she never wanted to be imprisoned, and has already been unable to resume her university studies while detained. She also criticized the UK’s prison system as a profit-driven enterprise.

    In closing testimony Friday, Devlin shared his personal background growing up Catholic in the majority-Protestant town of Ballymena, noting that a British soldier saved his grandfather’s life after he was nearly beaten to death by loyalist paramilitaries. The court was also told that Devlin, a working product designer, created a statue that won singer Sam Fender the 2023 Mercury Prize. Devlin told the jury he has seen senseless violence up close throughout his life, saying: “I grew up surrounded by violence, and it has always seemed senseless to me that humans inflict this harm on each other. There is no reason to accept extreme violence as inevitable, when we can stop it at its source.” He added that Palestine Action’s core goal is to force Elbit to cease all operations in the UK: “It is an absolutely horrific company, and I cannot understand why it is still allowed to operate here.”

    On Thursday, Corner testified about his confrontation with Sergeant Kate Evans, who was struck twice during the incursion. Corner told the jury he had already been incapacitated by Pava spray, and mistook Evans for an aggressive security guard attacking a fellow activist. The trial is ongoing.

  • King’s ‘high stakes’ visit with Trump will be toughest test yet of his reign

    King’s ‘high stakes’ visit with Trump will be toughest test yet of his reign

    Next week, King Charles III and Queen Camilla will embark on a historic state visit to the United States, a trip that insiders and analysts universally describe as a high-risk, high-reward endeavor unfolding against the most strained Anglo-American diplomatic backdrop in a century. Far from a perfunctory ceremonial stop marked by photo opportunities and celebrity receptions, the four-day tour carries genuine geopolitical and personal jeopardy, shaped by overlapping global conflicts, domestic political friction, lingering royal scandal, and the monarch’s ongoing health challenges.

    The visit arrives at a moment of extraordinary volatility across global politics. A fragile ceasefire currently holds in the Middle East following violent escalation around Iran, creating a tense international backdrop for diplomatic engagement. On the US side, the trip’s host, President Donald Trump, brings a well-documented record of unpredictability that has kept officials on both sides of the Atlantic on high alert. Recent controversies, including a widely criticized AI-generated image that appeared to depict Trump as a religious figure – a awkward situation for Charles, who serves as Supreme Governor of the Church of England – have added extra layers of sensitivity to the meeting.

    While Trump has long expressed open admiration for the British monarchy, his public criticism of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and his dismissive description of UK aircraft carriers as “toys” compared to American warships, has put the King – who holds the constitutional role of Head of the Armed Forces – in a delicate position. Transatlantic and NATO relations between the US and UK have sunk to a perilously low point in the months since Trump’s 2025 visit to Windsor Castle, with open disputes over the UK’s stance on the Iran conflict and Trump’s public downplaying of British military contributions in Afghanistan. Former Obama administration State Department advisor Max Bergmann warns that even with a carefully scripted itinerary designed to avoid unscripted interactions, there is no guarantee Trump will curb his usual off-the-cuff commentary during the visit.

    “The Trump show doesn’t get turned off because the King is in town,” Bergmann cautioned.

    Personal challenges compound the diplomatic pressure facing the 77-year-old monarch, who has lived with cancer for more than two years and will tackle a packed schedule of events across Washington D.C., New York City, and a Virginia national park. Most notably, lingering fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s long-standing ties to the convicted sex offender has already drawn demands from survivors’ advocates for a meeting with the King. Prince Andrew has consistently denied all allegations of wrongdoing connected to the case, and reached an out-of-court settlement with accuser Virginia Giuffre in 2022 without admitting liability or issuing an apology. Still, Giuffre’s family says they plan to lobby the King during his visit, asking for just 10 minutes of his time to receive a symbolic gesture of acknowledgement and support for ongoing investigations.

    “It’s an olive branch that we’re looking for,” said Amanda Roberts, Giuffre’s sister-in-law. “Acknowledgement, shaking the hand and looking us in the face and saying, ‘I will continue on my promise to honour a fair trial. I will support the investigations. And I’m sorry that all these survivors have waited so long for justice.’”

    Despite these stacked challenges, the trip also opens a rare window of opportunity to reset strained transatlantic ties. Analysts note that Charles, a longstanding advocate for liberal democratic values and the rules-based international order, has a unique personal connection with Trump that no UK elected official can match. Trump has repeatedly praised the King, calling him “a brave man, and a great man” in a recent BBC interview, and previous private interactions between the two saw Charles successfully persuade Trump to take a harder line on supporting Ukraine. Biographer Andrew Lownie, a leading royal commentator, argues that even with their stark ideological differences – Charles is a committed multilateralist, while Trump has embraced an America First agenda – the King’s decades of diplomatic experience let him find common ground.

    The centerpiece of the visit will be Charles’ address to a joint session of the US Congress, only the second time a British monarch has spoken to the full legislature, following his mother Queen Elizabeth II’s landmark 1991 speech. That 1991 address, which opened with a lighthearted joke about the Queen’s 1976 “talking hat” microphone mishap, made a forceful case for consensus politics and multilateral cooperation – a message that analysts say carries extra resonance today amid rising populism and global conflict. Charles’ speech is expected to balance flattery of the US president with quiet advocacy for core UK priorities: strengthened NATO unity, continued support for Ukraine, and progress on a bilateral US-UK trade agreement, leavened with gentle historical nods to the long-standing shared ties between the two nations.

    Royal insiders describe the trip as a “delicate balancing act,” acknowledging the current frictions but emphasizing that the visit is as much about celebrating the long history of the special relationship as it is about addressing current divides. The timing also aligns with the 250th anniversary of US independence, a symbolic marker that royal officials hope will highlight how far the transatlantic partnership has evolved since the Revolutionary War.

    While some analysts, like Bergmann, warn that the deep rift in current political relations makes this an inherently fraught endeavor, others see the visit as an unexpectedly timely opportunity for the UK. Harvard Kennedy School director Shannon Felton Spence, who organized a 2015 US visit for Charles when he was Prince of Wales, notes that the British monarchy remains the UK’s most effective soft power asset in the United States, particularly with a president who openly admires the institution.

    “This couldn’t have come at a better moment for the UK,” Spence said. “They’re playing exactly the right card, at a time when they didn’t even realize they’d be needing to play it.”

    Beyond the immediate political outcome, historians point to the long-term impact of royal state visits, from Queen Elizabeth II’s famous ride with Ronald Reagan in 1982 to Princess Diana’s iconic dance with John Travolta at the White House in 1985, moments that shaped public perception of the transatlantic relationship for decades. For King Charles, this trip will test whether his decades of preparation for the throne will let him navigate an unprecedented set of challenges to pull the special relationship back from its current low.

  • Thousands at risk after multi-million dollar Everest flood warning system left to rust

    Thousands at risk after multi-million dollar Everest flood warning system left to rust

    Nestled more than 5,000 meters above sea level in the shadow of Mount Everest, Imja Glacial Lake has long been recognized as one of the Himalayas’ most high-risk flood threats, swollen by accelerating glacial melt driven by human-caused global warming. A decade ago, a $3.5 million United Nations-backed risk reduction project drained 3.5 meters of water from the lake and installed a state-of-the-art early flood warning system designed to alert thousands of at-risk locals and visitors of an impending outburst. Today, that life-saving infrastructure has fallen into catastrophic disrepair, Nepalese government officials have confirmed to the BBC, leaving communities in the Everest region completely unprotected against a potential catastrophic disaster.

    Local Sherpa communities were the first to sound the alarm, reporting that no routine inspections or maintenance work have been carried out on the system since the 2016 draining project was completed. On-site observations confirm siren towers, built to blare audible warnings across remote mountain valleys, have been left to rust in the harsh high-altitude climate. Some units have even had their batteries stolen, leaving them completely inoperable. Compounding this critical failure, the satellite-linked infrastructure designed to transmit real-time water level data from the lake to forecasters in Kathmandu, which would trigger automated mobile phone alerts to at-risk communities, has been unreliable for years, according to officials from Nepal’s Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM).

    Scientists have repeatedly warned that glacial melt across the Hindu Kush Himalaya region is accelerating at an alarming rate, with ice loss doubling since 2000, according to a recent assessment from the Kathmandu-based International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development. Rising temperatures do not only expand glacial lakes like Imja to dangerous volumes; they also weaken mountain slopes, triggering more frequent rockfalls and glacial collapses that can instantly spark a catastrophic outburst flood. If Imja were to burst, the resulting wall of water would sweep away everything in its path, including downstream villages, popular trekking routes, bridges, and tourist infrastructure. Over the past 50 years, the Everest region has already recorded at least five separate glacial lake outburst floods, a trend experts project will grow worse as global temperatures continue to rise.

    For local communities, the failure of the early warning system has become a daily source of existential fear. Jangbu Sherpa, a resident of Chhukung, the first village that would be destroyed in an Imja outburst, says local leaders were promised annual inspections from DHM officials when the project was launched, but no official has visited the site in years. “We travel all the way to Kathmandu every year to beg DHM to repair and maintain the system, but nothing ever comes of our requests,” he said. Ang Nuru Sherpa, chairman of the Chaurikharka buffer zone adjacent to Sagarmatha National Park, echoed that frustration, pointing out that the local siren tower is already rusted, leaning, and at risk of collapsing at any moment. “Going by the state of the infrastructure, we don’t expect any warning at all even if the lake bursts tomorrow,” he said.

    The risk extends far beyond the six local villages that sit in Imja’s flood path. Tshering Sherpa, chief executive of the local NGO Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee, noted that spring brings more than 60,000 tourists, trekkers, and mountain climbers to the Everest region every year, all of whom are completely unaware of the unmonitored threat hanging over the area.

    DHM officials have acknowledged the risk, but blame chronic underfunding for the system’s collapse. Senior DHM meteorologist Niraj Pradhananga told the BBC that the central Nepalese government has failed to allocate any budget for maintenance, and a proposal to fund upkeep through contributions from downstream hydropower companies has never been implemented. “As things stand right now, we can’t even confirm if the sirens still work,” Pradhananga said, confirming reports that batteries have been stolen from units in downstream villages including Dingboche.

    Archana Shrestha, the DHM’s acting director general, added that all available resources and staffing were recently redirected to upgrade the early warning system for another high-risk glacial lake, leaving Imja completely neglected. “That work consumed all of our time and resources, but now we will turn our attention to Imja,” she said. The department is also revising its internal rules to ensure remote high-altitude sites like Imja get the dedicated staffing, budget, and resources required for regular maintenance, Shrestha added.

    The broken data transmission system has added another layer of failure. Even if the sirens were functional, the DHM has not received consistent real-time water level data from Imja’s hydro-met station, making it impossible to issue timely mobile alerts. Pradhananga said the department has raised the issue repeatedly with the satellite company and its local service provider, but the issue remains unresolved: the satellite company denies any fault on its end, blaming the local provider, which has not responded to the DHM’s inquiries and has not yet commented to the BBC on the issue.

    In a striking twist, the United Nations Development Programme has recently secured $36 million in grant funding to replicate the Imja risk reduction project at four other high-risk glacial lake sites across Nepal. UNDP Nepal communication head Monica Upadhyay said the failures at Imja have shaped the new projects, which will prioritize long-term sustainability from the start through clearer institutional governance, dedicated dedicated long-term financing, and targeted public-private partnerships to support ongoing maintenance.

    For Sherpa communities living in Imja’s shadow, that future planning offers little comfort. “This whole project has just been an eyewash,” said Nawang Thome Sherpa, head of the local government in Phakding, one of the vulnerable downstream villages. “They spent millions of dollars in the name of protecting us from disaster, but we still wake up every day living in fear of losing our lives and our homes.”

  • China to send two pandas to Atlanta

    China to send two pandas to Atlanta

    A decades-long collaborative conservation partnership between China and the United States will enter an exciting new chapter this year, following a formal announcement Friday from the China Wildlife Conservation Association that two young giant pandas will soon travel to Zoo Atlanta in Georgia under a freshly sealed 10-year agreement. The pact extends a bilateral giant panda conservation cooperation that first launched between the two institutions back in 1999, building on a 25-year track record of landmark scientific and cultural achievements.

    Born and raised at the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding in southwest China’s Sichuan Province, the new panda residents—male Ping Ping and female Fu Shuang—were selected for this assignment after years of careful health and behavioral assessment, association officials confirmed. The framework for the new decade-long cooperation was first negotiated and agreed upon between the Chengdu research base and Zoo Atlanta in 2025, with formal administrative approval completed earlier this year ahead of the public announcement.

    Preparation for the pandas’ arrival is already well underway at Zoo Atlanta, with Chinese conservation specialists providing on-site technical guidance to upgrade the pair’s new enclosure. Teams have worked closely to align habitat specifications with modern giant panda welfare requirements, refine daily husbandry routines, update nutritional feeding plans, and establish proactive health monitoring protocols tailored to the new arrivals.

    The previous generation of giant pandas at Zoo Atlanta, Lun Lun and Yang Yang, who arrived at the facility in 1999 as the first pair under the original partnership, left an extraordinary legacy of breeding success. Over their 25 years at the zoo, the pair produced seven cubs across five successful litters—a record that still stands as the most successful giant panda breeding outcome for any China-Western country international conservation partnership to date.

    Beyond breakthroughs in captive breeding, the two-decade collaboration has delivered far-reaching advances across multiple areas of giant panda science and public outreach. Joint research projects have produced new insights into giant panda behavioral patterns, developed cutting-edge protocols for preventive veterinary care, and expanded global public conservation education programs that reach millions of visitors annually. These shared research outputs and people-to-people exchanges have not only accelerated global progress in giant panda protection but also fostered deeper cultural understanding and connection between the Chinese and American public.

    For the new 10-year agreement, collaboration will prioritize four key focus areas: advanced disease prevention and control research, expanded cross-border scientific exchanges, in-situ giant panda conservation work in native wild habitats, and ongoing development of China’s Giant Panda National Park. The park, established in 2021, has already dramatically improved the connectivity, ecological coordination and overall protection integrity of giant panda habitats across China, bringing roughly 72% of the country’s total wild giant panda population under strict, unified protection.

    In a statement following the announcement, Raymond King, President and CEO of Zoo Atlanta, expressed enthusiastic support for the renewed partnership, noting that the facility feels deeply honored to once again be trusted as stewards of this globally beloved endangered species. “Zoo Atlanta is delighted and honored to yet again be trusted as stewards of this treasured species and to partner with the association on the continued conservation and research efforts that are the most important outcomes of this cooperation,” King said. “We can’t wait to meet Ping Ping and Fu Shuang, and to welcome our members, guests, city and community back to the wonder and joy of giant pandas.”

    Zoo Atlanta’s official statement also highlighted the extraordinary progress China has made in giant panda conservation over the past decades, noting that the Chinese government has allocated extensive human, material and financial capital to restore and protect wild giant panda habitats, establishing 67 dedicated giant panda reserves across the country to support population recovery. The statement added that the creation of Giant Panda National Park has marked a major step forward for cohesive, landscape-scale protection of the species, cementing China’s role as a global leader in endangered species conservation.

  • A nation built on pan-African principles faces questions about racism

    A nation built on pan-African principles faces questions about racism

    Zambia has long positioned itself as a continental leader in African nationalism and the anti-colonial struggle, yet 60 years after gaining full independence from British rule, dozens of Zambian citizens have spoken to the BBC about a persistent, underreported issue: subtle, systemic racism that continues to marginalize Black Zambians in daily life.

    While the discrimination is rarely open or explicit, those who shared their experiences describe feeling like second-class citizens in their own homeland. Accounts range from qualified Black candidates being sidelined for professional roles to being snubbed at hospitality venues and overlooked by rental property landlords. Even amid these accounts, however, many Zambians expressed cautious optimism, noting that open conversations about racial inequity are slowly becoming more mainstream across the country. The Zambian government has rejected claims that racism is a problem within its borders.

    Alexander Bwalya, a Black Zambian who requested a pseudonym to protect his privacy, told the BBC he finds it deeply jarring to experience anti-Black racism in a majority-Black African nation. He shared a firsthand account of discrimination at a wine bar in Lusaka, the country’s capital, where he and his friends were told specific high-end bottles of wine were out of stock. Moments later, the same bottles were offered to a white family that arrived after them, with waiters acting openly warm and accommodating to the new group.

    When Bwalya and his friends complained to the venue’s manager, they were told to leave if they were unhappy with the service. The argument escalated, and Bwalya claims the white manager used a racial slur against one of his Black friends. Like many others who experience these incidents, Bwalya chose not to file a police report, saying he lacked confidence that authorities would take the claim seriously.

    This conversation around race comes 60 years after Kenneth Kaunda, the iconic leader of Zambia’s independence movement, took office as the country’s first president in 1964. Before independence, colonial rule imposed harsh systemic racism: Black Zambians were forced to carry movement-restricting passes, schools and hospitals were legally segregated, and high-paying skilled mining jobs in Zambia’s copper-rich economy were exclusively reserved for white workers.

    As president, one of Kaunda’s core policy goals was to empower the Black majority. His signature “Zambianisation” program replaced white executive leaders in key industries with Black Zambian professionals, and he was a vocal international supporter of movements fighting to end white minority rule across southern Africa. Kaunda’s founding vision for the nation was unambiguous: Black Africans would no longer be subjugated, and Zambia would be built on a foundation of equal respect for people of all races, colors, and creeds.

    Yet a 2019 report from a United Nations human rights committee found that, like many other post-colonial societies, Zambia has failed to fully address the deep racial and class inequalities left by colonial rule. At the peak of colonial control, white residents made up less than 2% of Zambia’s population, and many left after independence. Today, no official population data tracks the current size of the white community, but all ethnic minorities combined, including Indians, Chinese and Arabs, make up roughly 9% of the total population.

    No official public data tracks racial disparities in modern Zambia, but anecdotal reports and grassroots conversations about the issue have exploded across social media in recent years. In one high-profile case earlier this year, a local recruiter from Zambian employment firm Recruitment Matters posted a sales and marketing manager opening that explicitly stated, “THIS ROLE IS CURRENTLY NOT OPEN TO ZAMBIAN NATIONALS; WE ARE LOOKING FOR EXPATS OR FOREIGN RESIDENTS IN ZAMBIA.”

    The post went viral across Zambian social media, sparking widespread public anger over its open discrimination. Omar Chanshi, a 37-year-old marketing professional based in Zambia, told the BBC that systemic exclusion from opportunities is a common experience for local workers. “There are contracts and systems and a lot of opportunities that we just don’t have access to as locals,” Chanshi said. “Forget trying to show whether you are the best or most qualified person, you just don’t have access.”

    Following the public backlash, the recruiter apologized and deleted the post. The company later issued a formal statement acknowledging the public concern, saying the wording of the post failed to meet the company’s standards and did not reflect its recruitment approach. “Recruitment Matters operates a non-discriminatory, skills-based recruitment policy,” the firm told the BBC.

    Victoria Phiri Chitungu, a historian and director of Livingstone Museum, argues that Kaunda’s zero-tolerance stance on overt discrimination simply pushed racism underground rather than eliminating it. “The obvious racist signs and acceptance of racism was no longer welcome and people were aware of that,” Chitungu explained. “But people started conforming to behave in ways that would not show racism. That doesn’t mean that it’s now absent.”

    Chitungu and fellow Zambian historian Chanda Penda note that while Zambia faces its own challenges with racism, it is not an outlier on the continent. Both point to far more severe discrimination they have observed in post-apartheid South Africa, where stark racial inequality remains rampant 30 years after the end of formal segregation.

    Malama Muleba, a Lusaka-based estate agent, told the BBC he does not see racism as a pervasive national crisis, but he confirms it is a widespread, open secret within the property rental sector. When landlords and property managers screen prospective tenants, Muleba says, white skin is still widely equated with financial stability. “If a person’s skin colour is white, people look at it, they see stability,” Muleba said. “They say: ‘OK, this person will be able to pay the rent or they will be able to not give me problems.’ Personally, it makes me feel a bit disappointed, but on the other side, it’s the reality.”

    Most of Zambia’s small white population, which includes both foreign expats and Zambian citizens, is concentrated in major urban centers and tourist hubs including Lusaka, Livingstone and Mkushi. Many white residents in Lusaka work for large multinational corporations, a demographic detail that has reinforced a widespread link between race and perceived wealth. Multiple Zambians who spoke to the BBC highlighted this intersection of race and class, noting that service providers often assume non-Black customers are wealthier and receive better treatment as a result.

    One common experience of discrimination came up repeatedly in the BBC’s interviews: preferential queue jumping for non-Black customers at public and private services. “When it comes to accessing certain services, you’ll find maybe there’s a queue and you’ve got some black Zambians, you’ve got some Indians and you’ve got a few white people there,” Muleba explained. “You’ll find in certain situations the white man will come first in getting attended to. The other Zambians will be looking among each other saying: ‘Look, we have been here long before this white man came here!’”

    Many observers note that it is often Black employees who provide this preferential treatment to non-Black customers in retail banks, coffee shops and retail stores. Some Zambians argue that this dynamic is not always rooted in personal prejudice: one Black citizen told the BBC that preferential treatment often tracks perceived wealth and class as much as race, with wealthy Black drivers in nice cars or with Western accents receiving the same elevated service.

    Zambia’s government has firmly denied that any form of racism exists in the country. Government spokesperson Cornelius Mweeta says anyone who claims racism is a problem is simply trying to sensationalize the issue for attention. “I’ll challenge any citizen out there to state that racism is a problem in Zambia. If there is somebody who has said that is a problem, I think perhaps they just wanted to sensationalise. Everyone is living harmoniously,” Mweeta said.

    Historian Penda agrees that racism in Zambia is almost entirely subtle, not overt, and traces its roots to cultural dynamics that predate modern independence. He argues that the deference to white people was culturally embedded long before colonial rule ended, rooted in the ancient regional legend of Luchele, a mystical white-appointed figure said to help ancestral communities found their kingdoms. When European colonialists and missionaries arrived in the late 19th century, many Zambian communities who had never seen white people before identified the newcomers as Luchele and treated them with reverence normally reserved for divine figures.

    “So from my perspective, it is not a big surprise that even up to now, we have this high esteem for white people – this racial imbalance has been passed down as from history,” Penda said.

    Adrian Scarlett, a white British man who has lived in Zambia for three years and is married to a Black Zambian woman, says he still struggles to comprehend how racial inequality can persist in a majority-Black African nation. Scarlett, who lives in Livingstone, says there are still exclusive private venues where Black Zambians are effectively unwelcome, forming all-white social cliques that gather for evening and weekend events.

    Scarlett originally built a large social media following under the alias Bye Bye Fatman documenting his weight loss journey, but today his content, which reaches more than 520,000 followers across Facebook and TikTok, focuses heavily on exposing and discussing racial inequality in Zambia. Some of his white friends have cut ties with him over his activism, but he says the response from Black Zambians has been overwhelmingly positive.

    Scarlett argues that these open conversations are long overdue, a sentiment echoed by Bwalya, who says Zambia desperately needs honest public dialogue about race. Bwalya says he is glad more people are willing to talk about the issue openly now, and he hopes the growing conversation will eventually lead to a national reckoning that revives the egalitarian, anti-racist vision of Zambia’s founding father.

  • Meeting with the King would ‘demonstrate human dignity’, says Epstein survivor

    Meeting with the King would ‘demonstrate human dignity’, says Epstein survivor

    A request for a meeting between survivors of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and senior British royals, including King Charles III, has been turned down by Buckingham Palace ahead of the upcoming state visit to the United States. One of Epstein’s survivors has publicly stated that a meeting with the King would have stood as a powerful demonstration of respect for human dignity, highlighting the symbolic weight that such an encounter would have carried for victims of sexual exploitation.

    The confirmation of the royal household’s refusal came from an anonymous source within Buckingham Palace, who confirmed that no audience between the King and the survivor group is scheduled to take place during the trip. This decision has drawn attention to the ongoing conversations around accountability for powerful figures connected to Epstein’s network, as well as the expectations that many survivors hold for global leaders to acknowledge their trauma.

    Epstein, a wealthy financier, died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, leaving dozens of survivors still seeking acknowledgment and justice. Many of his victims have spent years pushing for conversations with prominent public figures who once associated with Epstein, in hopes of raising broader awareness about sexual violence and the failures of systems that enabled his crimes for decades. The rejected request for a meeting during the British monarch’s high-profile US visit places renewed focus on how institutional bodies engage with survivors of high-profile abuse cases.

  • Activists break into Leicester factory owned by Israeli firm Elbit Systems

    Activists break into Leicester factory owned by Israeli firm Elbit Systems

    In a dramatic act of pro-Palestinian civil disobedience, a group of campaigners from the activist collective “People Against Genocide” has carried out a targeted occupation of an Israeli arms manufacturer’s facility in Leicester, United Kingdom. The action, which unfolded on the morning of April 24, 2026, targeted a site operated by UAV Tactical Systems, a subsidiary of Elbit Systems UK — the British branch of Israel’s largest defense contractor.

    According to on-the-ground reporting from independent media outlet The Aftershock, the group bypassed high-security perimeter defenses first: activists climbed over reinforced razor-wire fencing using ladders to access the factory grounds before moving to secure the building’s roof. Once on the roof, the team drilled access holes and abseiled down into the facility’s interior, breaking through a ceiling to enter the production floor.

    Circulated social media footage confirms the breach, showing activists entering the restricted clean room space that local reports confirm is used to manufacture components for Israeli military drones. The Aftershock’s reporting notes that the introduction of external contaminants to the tightly controlled clean room environment could render the entire production space inoperable for as long as several months, a major disruption to the site’s output.

    One participating activist spoke publicly about the motivation behind the action, emphasizing widespread anger over the British government’s ongoing diplomatic and logistical support for Israeli military operations in Gaza. “We are sick and tired of our government’s collaboration in this genocide that Israel is committing on the Palestinian people,” the activist said. “We know that genocide has no place in this world – so that’s why we’re here to shut Elbit down.”

    Elbit Systems holds an outsize role in Israel’s military infrastructure: the company supplies roughly 85 percent of all drones and land-based military equipment used by the Israeli Defense Forces, and has been identified as a key weapons supplier for Israel’s 2023–present military campaign in Gaza. Headquartered globally, the firm employs approximately 20,000 workers and posts annual revenues of around $2 billion, and has been a repeated target of pro-Palestinian direct action across the United Kingdom for years due to its deep military ties to Israel.

    A 2025 report from Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur for Palestine, underscored the company’s financial stake in the ongoing conflict, noting that “for Israeli companies such as Elbit Systems… the ongoing genocide has been a profitable venture.” Beyond its work supplying Israel, Elbit’s UK subsidiary currently holds a £57 million contract with the British Ministry of Defense to run Project Vulcan, a simulation-based training program for UK tank crews, a contract secured in 2023.

    This most recent action is part of a long-running campaign targeting Elbit’s British operations. In 2025, the UK government officially designated Palestine Action, another prominent direct action group that has repeatedly targeted Elbit subsidiary headquarters across the country, as a terrorist organization. Despite the ban, activism against Elbit’s UK presence has continued, driven by growing public opposition to British complicity in the Gaza crisis.

  • OpenAI boss ‘deeply sorry’ for not telling police of Tumbler Ridge suspect’s account

    OpenAI boss ‘deeply sorry’ for not telling police of Tumbler Ridge suspect’s account

    The chief executive and co-founder of leading artificial intelligence developer OpenAI has issued a formal public apology to the small Canadian community of Tumbler Ridge, after the company faced widespread criticism for failing to notify law enforcement of a problematic ChatGPT account tied to the perpetrator of a deadly January mass shooting.

    In a personal letter released publicly Thursday, Sam Altman expressed deep regret that OpenAI did not alert Canadian police to the account, which the company banned six months before the attack for violating content policies. “The pain your community has endured is unimaginable,” Altman wrote in the correspondence addressed directly to Tumbler Ridge residents. “While I know that words can never be enough, I believe an apology is necessary to recognize the harm and irreversible loss your community has suffered.” Altman, who is a parent to a young child, added, “I cannot imagine anything worse in this world than losing a child.”

    The shooting, carried out by 18-year-old Jesse Van Rootselaar, left eight people dead and nearly 30 others injured, making it one of the deadliest mass violent events in the history of British Columbia. Multiple of the victims were young secondary school students. Van Rootselaar died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound during the incident, law enforcement confirmed after the attack.

    In the weeks following the January shooting, OpenAI acknowledged that it had identified and banned Van Rootselaar’s ChatGPT account months before the attack over inappropriate usage. However, the company chose not to share the account information with police at the time, arguing that the activity on the account did not meet OpenAI’s internal threshold for a credible, imminent plan to inflict serious physical harm on others. Altman explained in his letter that he delayed the public apology out of respect for the community’s grieving process, noting that time was needed to allow residents to mourn before any public statement.

    An OpenAI spokesperson confirmed the authenticity of Altman’s letter to reporters, but declined to provide any additional comment beyond the content of the correspondence. The apology comes after the parents of a student who was severely wounded in the school attack filed a lawsuit against OpenAI. The lawsuit alleges that the company had clear, specific knowledge of the shooter’s long-term planning for a mass casualty event but failed to take any action to warn authorities or prevent the attack.

    This incident is not the only legal and regulatory scrutiny OpenAI is facing over connections between its AI chatbot and mass violent attacks. The company is already the subject of an active criminal investigation in Florida, tied to a 2025 shooting at Florida State University that left two people dead and multiple others injured. Authorities are probing the case after the suspect accused in that attack reportedly used ChatGPT to plan his assault.

    In response to growing pressure over AI safety protocols, OpenAI has committed to updating and strengthening its internal safety monitoring systems. In his letter, Altman reaffirmed the company’s commitment to collaboration, writing that OpenAI will continue working with all levels of government to put new safeguards in place that prevent a similar tragedy from occurring in the future.