作者： admin

Nigeria confronts a severe security emergency as conflicting narratives emerge regarding perpetrators behind a recent wave of mass abductions. While the government attributes these kidnappings to jihadist organizations Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), independent analysts present contradictory evidence pointing to local criminal networks.

The crisis intensified through three major incidents within one week: On November 17, 25 students and a teacher were abducted from Government Girls Comprehensive Secondary School in Kebbi state; November 18 witnessed 38 worshippers kidnapped from Christ Apostolic Church in Kwara state; and November 21 saw the most devastating attack with approximately 250 children and 12 staff members taken from St. Mary’s Catholic School in Niger state. While most victims from the first two incidents have been released, the majority from the Niger state kidnapping remain captive.

Presidential spokesman Sunday Dare asserted to BBC that ‘abundant data nationally and internationally reveals clearly that ISWAP are all over the place,’ maintaining that both ISWAP and remnants of Boko Haram are responsible. However, the government has not produced concrete evidence supporting these claims.

Contrary to official statements, security analysts and the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) identify Fulani militia groups—locally termed ‘bandits’—as the actual perpetrators. These decentralized criminal networks operate primarily in northwestern Nigeria, distinct from the jihadist groups concentrated in the northeast. According to ACLED’s analysis, the school abduction in Niger state appears partially motivated by political objectives against the government, while the church attack in Kwara state aligns with Fulani expansionist agendas and displacement campaigns for illegal mining operations.

The kidnapping epidemic represents a lucrative criminal enterprise in Nigeria, where ransom payments remain illegal but widely suspected to occur. Presidential spokesman Dare ambiguously referenced ‘kinetic, non-kinetic, negotiations, etc.’ as successful processes for securing releases, avoiding direct confirmation of ransom payments.

This security crisis has attracted international attention, particularly after former US President Donald Trump threatened military intervention if Christian targeting continues. However, Nigerian officials and experts emphasize that victims span all religious affiliations, contradicting narratives of sectarian targeting.

The situation echoes Nigeria’s tragic history with mass abductions, notably the infamous Chibok schoolgirls incident where many children remained captive for years or died in captivity. Current President Bola Tinubu has promised to rescue remaining abductees but provided no timeline for resolution.

In a landmark conservation decision, the oceanic whitetip shark has received the highest level of international protection at the ongoing UN wildlife conference in Samarkand, Uzbekistan. The species becomes the first among more than 70 proposed shark and ray species to be uplisted to Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), effectively banning all commercial international trade of these sharks and their products.

The decision, adopted during the 20th Meeting of the CITES Conference of Parties (November 24-December 5), has been hailed by conservationists as a historic breakthrough for marine protection. The oceanic whitetip has experienced catastrophic population declines of 80-90% within just three generations due to relentless hunting for its fins and meat.

Barbara Slee, senior program manager at the International Fund for Animal Welfare, described the move as “our last hope for the oceanic whitetips,” emphasizing that these ancient predators have roamed oceans for millions of years but faced systematic slaughter. Luke Warwick, director of shark and ray conservation at the Wildlife Conservation Society, called the decision “a watershed moment for all sharks and rays,” noting it represents the first time CITES has granted full protection with a complete international trade ban to any shark species.

The protection comes amid alarming scientific evidence about global shark declines. A recent study in Science Advances revealed that over 37% of shark species now face extinction threats due to overexploitation. Another study in PLOS One documented severe ecological stress in coastal marine protected areas, with researchers observing a disturbing trend of “fishing down the food web” where removal of large species forces targeting of increasingly smaller species, pushing ecosystems toward collapse.

Lester Gittens, lead delegate from the Bahamas, stressed both economic and ecological imperatives for protection: “Sharks support jobs across our islands and further declines benefit no one. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the term critically endangered—the next category is extinct in the wild.”

The Appendix I listing is expected to eliminate incentives for illegal fishing and provide the species with critical recovery opportunities. With over 3,000 delegates attending the conference, further discussions will address additional proposals for shark and ray species protections.

The recently concluded G20 Leaders’ Summit in Johannesburg has received widespread acclaim from South African officials and policy experts for its unprecedented focus on African priorities and reinforcement of multilateral cooperation. Supra Mahumapelo, Chairperson of the South African Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on International Relations, emphasized that the presidency successfully positioned African concerns at the forefront of the global agenda, creating what he described as “a strategic diplomatic focus on Africa that will never disappear in future global history.

The summit, which concluded with South Africa formally passing the presidency to the United States, produced a landmark declaration that extensively addresses continental issues. The comprehensive document includes commitments on Africa’s debt sustainability, support for the African Union, development of the African Continental Free Trade Area, and policies on artificial intelligence and strategic mineral beneficiation.

According to Sizo Nkala, Senior Researcher at the University of Johannesburg’s Centre for Africa-China Studies, the declaration represents “the most Africa-focused G20 Declaration we have seen since its inception in 1990.” He noted that Africa was referenced 52 times throughout the document, reflecting South Africa’s Pan-Africanist approach and the continent’s growing influence in global forums following the African Union’s permanent membership.

The declaration captures critical issues affecting both Africa and the Global South, including climate finance, food security, and reform of international financial institutions. Despite Africa’s abundance of critical minerals, Nkala highlighted that these resources have not been sufficiently leveraged to benefit African citizens, while many nations continue to face acute food insecurity and substantial debt-servicing burdens.

The diplomatic process itself drew praise for building consensus among diverse global actors, with the declaration receiving overwhelming approval on the first day of proceedings. Aleta Miller, UN Women South Africa Country Representative, noted that while disagreements emerged during negotiations, member states successfully found common ground, demonstrating the continued strength of multilateral cooperation in addressing global challenges.