Japan Inc is betting big on India as China risks deepen

Against a backdrop of shifting global supply chains and stagnating domestic demand, Japanese corporations across retail, finance, technology and manufacturing are rapidly scaling their presence in India, marking one of the most significant cross-border investment waves the South Asian economy has seen in recent years.

Last week, India’s Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal led the nation’s largest-ever business delegation to Tokyo to deepen bilateral trade and investment ties, a high-profile engagement that underscores how quickly Japan’s economic footprint in Asia’s third-largest economy has grown in recent years. A walk through any major commercial district in Mumbai, New Delhi or Bengaluru makes this expansion impossible to miss: established Japanese consumer brands are racing to open new locations, while first-time entrants are carving out new market share across the country.

Well-known names including apparel retailers Uniqlo and Muji, as well as premium footwear brand Onitsuka Tiger, have operated in India for years, but are now rolling out aggressive expansion plans to reach tier-2 and tier-3 cities. Niche Japanese firms are also joining the push: furniture manufacturer Nitori recently completed its market entry, while major convenience store chain Lawson has announced plans to launch 10,000 locations across India by 2050, starting with a first wave of stores in Mumbai.

The trend extends far beyond consumer retail. At a time when many global financial institutions are divesting from Indian banking assets, Japanese banks are actively acquiring large stakes in the country’s growing financial sector. In 2024, Japan’s largest lender MUFG Bank closed a $4.4 billion deal to purchase a 20% stake in Indian non-bank financial firm Shriram Finance, the largest single foreign investment in India’s financial history to date. That same year, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) became the largest shareholder of Indian private sector lender Yes Bank, acquiring a 24.22% stake in the institution.

Japan has also emerged as the top Asia-Pacific contributor to India’s fast-growing global capability centre (GCC) ecosystem, according to recent analysis from professional services firm Deloitte. More than 100 Japanese multinational corporations now operate GCCs—offshore innovation hubs that handle high-value core functions including research and development, corporate strategy and artificial intelligence development—across India, tapping the country’s large pool of skilled tech and business talent.

Industry analysts say this coordinated expansion is driven by clear long-term business logic. Vipul Nath Jindal, founder of Next Bharat Ventures, a Suzuki-backed impact fund that recently launched a $200 million India-focused fund, explained that Japan’s shrinking domestic population has created a permanent decline in domestic demand, forcing Japanese firms to look abroad for sustainable growth. “Japan’s population has been declining for 16 to 17 years, so it’s not just a temporary slowdown—its home market is permanently shrinking,” Jindal told the BBC.

At the same time, other traditional expansion markets for Japanese firms have become far less attractive. Geopolitical tensions and shifting economic conditions have caused a sharp drop in Japanese investment into China, while high tariffs and intense domestic competition make the U.S. market a challenging growth destination, and smaller Southeast Asian economies lack the scale to support large-scale expansion. Against this backdrop, India’s 1.4 billion-person consumer market and rapidly growing middle class make it a natural long-term growth target.

Bilateral government ties have laid the groundwork for this private sector boom. The two nations signed a bilateral trade liberalization agreement nearly 15 years ago, and after Prime Minister Narendra Modi took office in 2014, the relationship was upgraded to a “special strategic and global partnership.” The Indian government set a target to double the number of Japanese firms operating in the country, and launched high-profile infrastructure projects including India’s first high-speed bullet train between Mumbai and Ahmedabad, which is being built using Japanese Shinkansen technology.

Today, the expansion is being led primarily by private Japanese companies, rather than just intergovernmental initiatives. During Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s first official visit to New Delhi in July, Japanese firms announced 120 new investment agreements totalling $12.5 billion, spanning sectors from semiconductors to renewable energy. Commerce Minister Goyal has noted that Japan is on track to hit its 10 trillion yen ($68 billion) investment target for India years ahead of schedule. Even small and medium-sized Japanese enterprises (SMEs) are joining the trend: Hamamatsu City, a manufacturing hub that is home to Suzuki, Honda and Yamaha and hosts one of Japan’s highest concentrations of manufacturing SMEs, recently established the Hamamatsu India Committee to help local small businesses enter the Indian market.

This rising investment in India has coincided with a drop in net Japanese investment into China, but experts emphasize that this is not a coordinated, government-led shift away from China. University of Tokyo researcher Toshiro Nishizaewa argues that the trend reflects a market-driven diversification strategy by Japanese firms, which are reallocating capital to reduce risk rather than responding to political pressure to decouple from China. Shruti Pandalai, India Chair at the Lowy Institute, explained that Japanese firms are simply reducing concentration risk after years of supply chain disruptions and geopolitical uncertainty, and India acts as a useful hedge against China-related disruptions. Pandalai adds that the alignment between Japan’s economic security priorities and India’s ambition to become a global manufacturing hub has strengthened the bilateral relationship, even through multiple changes of government in Tokyo. “Successive Japanese administrations have raised investment targets instead of cutting them, which shows the relationship is no longer just dependent on top-level diplomacy—it’s embedded in the bureaucratic, corporate and strategic planning of both countries,” she said.

For India, which is actively seeking to attract sustained foreign direct investment to drive economic growth and job creation, this wave of Japanese capital comes at a critical juncture. Pandalai notes that closer economic cooperation with Japan could also help reduce India’s large trade deficit with China and gradually decrease Beijing’s economic leverage in key sectors including critical minerals and advanced manufacturing over the long term.

Despite the momentum, experts warn that significant challenges remain to fully expanding the bilateral economic relationship. Pratnashree Basu, an analyst at the Observer Research Foundation, points out that Japan remains deeply integrated into Chinese manufacturing supply networks, which limits how far coordinated Japan-India economic action against China can go—any coordinated measures would impose major commercial costs on Japan and risk retaliation from Beijing.

India’s own challenging business environment also remains a major barrier for foreign investors, including Japanese firms. Longstanding issues including tax policy uncertainty, bureaucratic red tape, and lengthy delays for land and environmental approvals continue to slow investment projects. A former Japanese cabinet minister recently publicly criticized the Indian government for repeated delays to the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project, accusing India of reneging on commitments to prioritize its own interests—a claim the Indian government quickly rejected. Chinese state media quickly highlighted the public disagreement to emphasize what it frames as endemic contractual risks in doing business in India.

The incident underscores that even as India signs dozens of large-scale economic and defense agreements with Japan, New Delhi will need to implement targeted regulatory and bureaucratic reforms to maintain the current investment momentum, especially as it struggles to attract consistent large-scale foreign capital from other major global economies.