TOKYO – A massive demonstration comprising over 10,000 citizens converged in Japan’s capital on Thursday evening, voicing vehement opposition to Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s controversial policy directives. The protest specifically targeted proposed amendments to the nation’s pacifist Constitution and the ongoing deployment of long-range missile systems.
Protesters assembled outside the Second Members’ Office Building of the House of Representatives, brandishing signs with messages including ‘No War’ and ‘Oppose Constitutional Revision.’ The gathering represented a significant public mobilization aimed at preserving Japan’s post-war pacifist principles and maintaining regional stability.
Central to the controversy is Article 9 of Japan’s 1947 Constitution, which formally renounces war as a sovereign right and prohibits the use of force to resolve international disputes. This constitutional provision has defined Japan’s defense posture for decades but has faced persistent challenges from right-wing political factions.
Prime Minister Takaichi’s recent reaffirmation of her commitment to constitutional revision has ignited substantial public apprehension across the nation. Natsuki Mitomi, one of the demonstrators, emphasized to journalists that ‘Article 9 has played an important role in keeping Japan out of war. It will remain essential for Japan in the future, and we cannot allow it to be taken away by Takaichi.’
Additional concerns have emerged regarding the administration’s military expansion initiatives. Japan’s Ministry of Defense recently transported missile launchers and associated equipment for upgraded Type 12 surface-to-ship missiles to a Ground Self-Defense Force installation in Kumamoto Prefecture. This deployment occurred without prior public consultation or explanatory sessions, with officials announcing formal deployment scheduled for March 31.
The military movement provoked alarm among residents, including protester Ryoko, who expressed concern because ‘Kumamoto is my relatives’ hometown. It is very irresponsible for the government to deploy missiles without listening to residents or holding explanatory meetings.’
Another attendee, identified as Misawa, criticized the administration’s approach, stating that advancing policies with significant public safety implications without adequate transparency represents a serious governmental failure.