Whistleblower claims KPMG partners took millions of dollars in secret commissions

A series of explosive confidential documents, submitted by anonymous whistleblowers, detailing grave allegations of secret commission payments, widespread tax avoidance, and misuse of client funds at major global accounting firm KPMG have been formally presented to an Australian parliamentary committee. The submissions, which form part of an ongoing parliamentary inquiry into KPMG audit leaks, bring a wave of new scrutiny to the firm’s internal conduct over decades of operation in Australia. At the heart of the submissions is a heavily redacted whistleblower letter dated August 8, 2023, which claims that former senior partners at KPMG’s Australian division collectively received $2.4 million in off-the-books secret commissions that rightfully belonged to the firm as corporate income. A separate earlier whistleblower submission, dated July 19, 2021, similarly alleges that former partners accepted hidden kickbacks in exchange for arranging aggressive, potentially illegal tax schemes for the firm’s high-net-worth clients. Unredacted versions of the correspondence, first reported by Australian media, name Chris Jordan, the former head of the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), as one of the former partners implicated in the claims. The whistleblower alleges Jordan received secret commissions during his tenure as a KPMG partner prior to leading the national tax agency, and additionally claims he failed to file a personal tax return for more than 25 years. A second former partner, Phillip Henry, is also named in the submissions. The documents allege Henry misappropriated client funds to cover personal expenses, including home renovations and the purchase of a private jet ski, and also engaged in repeated inappropriate conduct toward female colleagues and clients. Beyond the personal and financial misconduct allegations, the submitted documents also detail additional institutional failures at KPMG Australia. The whistleblower claims the 1997 internal partner election outcome for the firm’s New South Wales division was deliberately falsified, and that one partner illegally smuggled cash from Singapore into Australia to help a client evade tax obligations. Further allegations center on misuse of confidential client data, claiming sensitive client information was improperly shared among KPMG teams working for competing client companies, and that the firm mishandled prior internal whistleblower complaints about misconduct. It is important to note that the submissions only represent allegations made by anonymous whistleblowers, and no findings of wrongdoing have been proven against any of the named partners or KPMG as an institution at this stage of the parliamentary inquiry.