标签： Oceania

A 46-year-old man from Mernda is at the center of multiple allegations of aggressive harassment and trespassing after targeting businesses across Melbourne, with shocking CCTV footage capturing his hostile interactions with staff who rejected his unsolicited sales pitches. Victoria Police have confirmed they spoke to the man following a formal complaint filed over the May 11 incident at a Ravenhall business, located in Melbourne’s western outskirts, and he has since been released pending a future court summons.

The first and most widely reported incident involves Mikaela Borg, a small business owner who says she was left shaken and in tears after the man showed up at her workplace unannounced to push discount vouchers for a local mechanic. When Borg declined the offer and asked him to exit her premises, the man erupted into verbal aggression. Security footage from Borg’s store captures the visibly angry man reaching for her security camera before launching into a verbal tirade, telling Borg to “shut the door and … go jump in a lake” before leaving the property.

In an interview with 7News, Borg described the lingering fear from the encounter, saying “I’m just frightened, obviously, to be in my own workplace. I didn’t know who he was – he wasn’t wearing ID.” What Borg has experienced is not an isolated case, according to local reporting. Multiple businesses across Melbourne, and even some in Perth, have come forward with similar accounts of the man’s uninvited, aggressive sales tactics. Additional CCTV footage from other workplaces shows the man screaming profanities at staff after being asked to leave, and approaching waiting patients inside a chiropractic clinic just hours after his confrontation with Borg.

Leon Callea, owner of Ravenhall-based mechanic workshop GM-F Performance, previously allowed the man to sell discount vouchers at his business after the man claimed he could help boost the workshop’s customer base. Callea told reporters he terminated the agreement almost immediately after receiving a complaint about the salesman’s behavior.

A Victoria Police spokesperson shared detailed context around the incident in an official statement, confirming the allegations: “It is alleged a man entered a warehouse on Katherine Dr and aggressively touted a business service about 3.40pm. When the offer was declined by the sole occupant of the premises, the man became aggressive and refused to leave after being told to. The man eventually left the premises.” Police confirmed the 46-year-old Mernda man was interviewed after the report, and was released pending summons. Authorities have not yet released information on whether formal charges have been filed.

Local business owners have taken to social media to share their own encounters with the man and warn others about his behavior. Victoria Police is urging any member of the public or business owner who has had a negative interaction with the man or has additional information related to the incident to contact Crime Stoppers anonymously on 1800 333 000 or file a report through the official Crime Stoppers Victoria website.

A landmark transgender discrimination case in Australia has concluded with a revised ruling that strengthens protections for gender-diverse people, boosting the compensation awarded to a trans woman who was expelled from a female-only digital platform.

The case, which has made legal history as the first gender identity discrimination claim to be heard by Australia’s Federal Court, stems from an incident in 2021, when Roxanne Tickle, a trans woman, downloaded and registered for the Giggle for Girls app. After completing the selfie-based registration process, Tickle used the platform for six months before her account was removed by the app’s founder, Sall Grover.

Grover, who launched the app in 2020 after experiencing misogynistic abuse from men during her career as a screenwriter in Hollywood, created the platform to serve as a private, women-only digital safe space. During the original court proceedings, Grover testified that she removed Tickle’s account after identifying what she described as “male facial features” in Tickle’s profile photo, treating her the same way she would treat any cisgender man seeking access to the platform.

Nearly two years ago, the original ruling found Grover guilty of indirect discrimination against Tickle and awarded the trans woman AU$10,000 in compensation. Dissatisfied with the finding, Grover filed an appeal seeking to overturn the original verdict. On Friday, a full panel of three Federal Court judges dismissed Grover’s appeal, upgrading the ruling to a finding of unlawful direct discrimination against Tickle and doubling her compensation to AU$20,000, equal to roughly $14,000 USD or £11,000 GBP.

In their judgement, the judges noted that the original trial judge had made an error in not classifying Tickle’s removal, which followed Grover’s initial visual assessment of her profile photo, as direct discrimination. The ruling confirmed that under Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act, service providers are prohibited from discriminating against individuals on the basis of gender identity. The court made clear that Grover had treated Tickle, a trans woman, far less favorably than she would have treated a cisgender woman seeking access to the app.

Throughout the original trial, Grover’s legal team argued that sex is a strictly biological category, and conceded that discrimination did occur, but claimed it was based on biological sex rather than gender identity.

Shortly after the Federal Court released its revised ruling Friday, Grover announced she plans to take her challenge to Australia’s High Court in a final bid to overturn the judgement.

A shocking animal cruelty case out of Mount Barker, South Australia, has exposed the horrific neglect 30 cats and two dogs endured at the hands of local couple Kelly and Matthew De La Haye, who this week received sentencing after pleading guilty to 24 separate counts of animal ill-treatment.

The case unfolded after officials from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) South Australia launched an investigation into the couple’s three-bedroom residential property. When RSPCA inspectors first arrived at the home, they were immediately overwhelmed by the thick, putrid stench of accumulated animal waste. Body-worn camera footage and official photos captured by inspectors lay bare the full scale of the unsanitary conditions the animals were forced to endure: feces and pooled urine covered nearly every surface, caking flooring, walls, and door frames across all rooms of the home.

Of the animals found on the property, many showed clear signs of severe neglect and untreated illness. Some cats were visibly emaciated and unwell, with most suffering from untreated conditions including cat flu, conjunctivitis, and advanced dental disease, several of which required urgent surgical intervention. Three young kittens were found entirely coated in diarrhea from their legs to their backs, and when questioned, Kelly De La Haye admitted she had known the three kittens had been ill for months but had never booked a veterinary appointment for them. Only six of the 32 animals removed from the property had been desexed, in violation of South Australia’s Dog and Cat Management Act.

Following the inspection, 28 cats were voluntarily surrendered by De La Haye, while the remaining two cats and two dogs were legally seized by the organization. All animals were transported to RSPCA SA’s dedicated animal care campus in O’Halloran Hill for urgent veterinary assessment and care. Unfortunately, the severe neglect left some animals with irreversible health complications: one animal died of natural causes related to its poor condition, and four others required humane euthanasia to end their unmanageable suffering. Twenty-seven of the rescued animals were able to recover with treatment and have since been adopted into new, loving homes.

Speaking after the sentencing, Andrea Lewis, head of animal welfare at RSPCA SA, expressed disappointment that the couple failed to take action to improve the deadly conditions in their home before the investigation. “It is disappointing this couple didn’t address their squalid and unhygienic conditions, as it jeopardized the health and wellbeing of the animals in their care,” Lewis said. She also used the case to issue a critical public reminder to prospective pet owners: “We seriously urge people to only commit to pets that they have the resources to adequately care for, and desex their animals, as required by law under the dog and cat management act.”

At a hearing held at Mount Barker Magistrates Court on Thursday, Magistrate Oliver Koehn handed down the court’s sentence. The couple were each issued a two-year good behavior bond requiring a $200 security deposit, and ordered to pay $6,672 each in victim of crime levies. In addition to the financial penalties, Koehn issued a permanent ban preventing the De La Hayes from owning any kind of pet in the future, unless the court issues a subsequent order reversing the ban. All animals originally in the couple’s care were formally forfeited to the RSPCA to complete their recovery and adoption process.

A major suburban shopping centre in Brisbane’s northwest was forced into an immediate evacuation and full lockdown on Wednesday after a pair of teenage girls launched a destructive rampage through an on-site Woolworths supermarket, threatening bystanders and destroying store property before arriving police took the pair into custody.

Videos of the chaotic incident, which were widely shared across Australian social media platforms, capture the full sequence of the disturbance at the Keperra Great Western Super Centre. Footage shows the two teens wandering through the supermarket aisles, yanking hundreds of dollars worth of packaged goods, beverages and grocery products off display shelves and leaving items scattered across the floor in their wake. Audio recorded on one clip captures the open frustration of trapped shoppers who confronted the pair mid-rampage. One woman is heard sarcastically praising the teens’ destructive actions, while an angry man shouts that he hopes they will face jail time for their behavior.

One video shows one of the teenage suspects sipping from a stolen bottle of Powerade, before shrugging off angry shopper confrontations and moving to spray the beverage’s contents toward nearby bystanders. Throughout the footage, the wail of the shopping centre’s evacuation alarm can be heard blaring in the background, as staff and customers begin exiting the building in response to the unfolding emergency.

Queensland Police confirmed that officers were dispatched to the Ridgeline Way shopping centre at approximately 3 p.m. local time following multiple emergency calls about the public disturbance. In an official statement following the incident, a police spokesperson confirmed that the entire supermarket was fully evacuated as a safety precaution, and the two teen girls were taken into police custody without further incident. As of Thursday morning, law enforcement officials have not released any additional details about whether formal charges will be filed against the pair, nor have they released the ages of the suspects due to Australian youth privacy laws.

Local business owner Felicity Osborne, who operates Keirden Dry Cleaners just steps from the Woolworths location, told local outlet The Courier Mail that early unconfirmed reports suggest the rampage stemmed from an internal argument between the two suspects. She confirmed the entire Great Western Super Centre was cleared of all visitors and staff for roughly 30 minutes while police responded to the scene, and the Woolworths location remained closed for the rest of the day to clean up the damage caused by the incident.

Representatives for both Great Western Super Centre and Woolworths Australia have been contacted for additional comment on the incident and the extent of property damage, but have not yet released a public statement as of publication.

Against the backdrop of a persistent, deadly national gun violence epidemic that has plagued K-12 campuses across the United States, one private company has introduced an unconventional new approach to stopping active shooters before first responders can arrive: human-piloted unarmed drones designed to disable attackers.

The concept is the creation of Campus Guardian Angel, a U.S.-based firm that has already launched pilot programs for the technology at schools in Georgia and Florida, with mounting interest from education communities in Texas — a state that has seen some of the country’s deadliest school shootings in recent years. To date, the system has not been tested in a real active shooter scenario, but its developers say it fills a critical gap in campus safety between the moment an attack is reported and law enforcement reaches the scene.

The framework mirrors a long-running ideological strain in U.S. gun violence policy debates, which argues that the solution to recurring mass shootings is not stricter firearms regulation, but additional defensive technology in public spaces — similar to the controversial push to arm teachers and school staff.

Here is how the system operates: When a potential shooter enters a school campus, a teacher or staff member triggers an alarm via a smartphone app that simultaneously alerts local police. While officers are en route, a drone is immediately activated from a pre-positioned hiding spot inside the school, serving as the first line of defense against the attacker.

These small, black, roughly square craft weigh approximately two pounds (one kilogram) each. Unlike military offensive drones, they carry no bullets or lethal projectiles. Instead, they are controlled remotely by human operators based in Austin, Texas, who navigate the drones through school hallways using custom 3D maps of each campus pre-loaded into the system.

According to Khristof Oborski, Campus Guardian Angel’s director of tactical operations, the idea grew out of observations of small drone effectiveness on battlefields in the war in Ukraine. Bill King, the company’s CEO and a former Navy SEAL, noticed how even lightweight, low-cost drones could disrupt and disable targets, prompting him to adapt the technology for the growing U.S. crisis of school shootings.

Oborski explained that the drone’s response is tailored to the attacker’s actions. If the suspect is still moving through hallways without opening fire, the drone’s built-in two-way radio allows remote operators to communicate directly with the attacker, attempting to persuade them to surrender and lay down their weapon. Operators maintain constant contact with responding law enforcement, guiding officers directly to the attacker’s location to cut down on response time. If the shooter has already begun firing on students and staff, the system immediately escalates to disabling tactics: either direct kinetic impacts by flying into the attacker, or a blast of less-lethal JPX pepper gel to incapacitate them.

Data from the firearms incident database IntelliSee shows that U.S. schools recorded 233 separate incidents involving firearms in 2025 alone. The 2022 mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas — which left 19 children and two teachers dead — highlighted catastrophic delays in law enforcement response, with officers taking 77 minutes to engage and kill the attacker. Proponents of the drone system say it addresses exactly this gap, providing an immediate response while police are on the way.

Campus Guardian Angel offers the system through annual service contracts, with pricing adjusted based on a school’s student population, size and number of campus buildings. Beyond the ongoing pilot projects in Florida and Georgia, the company reports that groups of parents in Houston, Texas have already expressed interest in installing the drones at their local children’s schools.

King emphasized that the ultimate goal of the system is deterrence, rather than active use. “The best-case scenario is we put this in every single school in America and then never have to use it, right? Because it’s got a deterrent quality to it,” he said. King also addressed common concerns about autonomous operation, confirming that no artificial intelligence is used to pilot the drones — a detail that many school stakeholders find reassuring.

Alex Campbell, a 30-year-old system operator and professional drone-racing competitor, framed his role as a quiet contribution to campus safety. “To be the nerd behind the scenes, to help the heroes on this Earth saving us from the bad things happening, it’s really fulfilling to be able to have a hand in that,” Campbell said.