标签: North America

北美洲

  • Rocky Horror star Tim Curry dies at 80

    Rocky Horror star Tim Curry dies at 80

    Legendary British actor Tim Curry, whose decades-long career spanned stage, screen, and voice work and shaped popular culture across generations, has passed away peacefully at his home in Los Angeles’ Toluca Lake neighborhood on August 25 at the age of 80. His decades-long body of work included some of the most recognizable and beloved characters in modern entertainment history, starting with the role that made him a household name: the flamboyant, irreverent mad scientist Dr. Frank-N-Furter in *The Rocky Horror Picture Show*.

    Curry’s path to stardom began shortly after he graduated from university, when he landed his first professional acting role in the original 1968 London production of the boundary-pushing rock musical *Hair*. It was there that he met playwright Richard O’Brien, who invited him to audition for O’Brien’s new experimental stage production in 1973. Curry won the lead role, and first brought the lingerie-clad “sweet transvestite” Dr. Frank-N-Furter to life at London’s Royal Court Theatre, where the show quickly gained a cult fanbase that pushed for a big-screen adaptation.

    The 1975 film adaptation, co-starring Susan Sarandon and Barry Bostwick, was not an immediate box office success, but it grew into a global cultural phenomenon that still holds the record for the longest-running theatrical release in film history. Curry’s iconic performance of the famous line “Don’t dream it, be it” became a rallying cry for self-expression, and cemented his legacy as a performer who redefined what on-screen character acting could be.

    Beyond *Rocky Horror*, Curry built a sprawling, versatile career that spanned every genre of entertainment. In the 1990 television miniseries adaptation of Stephen King’s horror classic *It*, his menacing portrayal of the killer clown Pennywise set a benchmark for on-screen horror that still influences adaptations decades later. He took on comedic roles as Long John Silver in 1996’s *Muppet Treasure Island*, the con artist Rooster Hannigan in 1982’s *Annie*, and the uppity hotel manager in 1992’s *Home Alone 2: Lost in New York*, alongside memorable turns in *The Hunt for Red October*, *Clue*, *Legend*, *Congo*, and *Scary Movie 2*.

    On Broadway, Curry earned three Tony Award nominations: first for his portrayal of Mozart in the original 1981 production of *Amadeus*, then for 1993’s *My Favorite Year*, and finally for his leading turn as King Arthur in the hit Monty Python musical *Spamalot* in 2005, a role he also performed in the West End to critical acclaim. Even in the digital space, Curry gained a new generation of fans in the 2000s: his over-the-top performance as Soviet Premier Anatoly Cherdenko in the 2008 video game *Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3* spawned a viral meme that has racked up more than 10 million views on YouTube alone. The line, “I’m going to escape, to the one place that hasn’t been corrupted by capitalism… space!” delivered with a barely stifled laugh, remains a staple of online comedy.

    In 2012, Curry suffered a debilitating stroke that left him reliant on a wheelchair, but he never retired from creative work. He shifted his focus to voice acting, continued to make appearances at fan conventions around the world, and published his memoir *Vagabond* in 2025, which was released by Grand Central Publishing.

    Following the announcement of his death, tributes poured in from fellow performers, collaborators, and fans across the globe. Welsh actor Luke Evans, who stepped into the role of Frank-N-Furter for a Broadway revival, praised Curry as “a force, a bright fierce flame, an exquisite charm.” In a letter to the late actor, Evans thanked him for inspiring generations of performers to embrace bravery, writing, “Being compared to you has been one of the greatest compliments I’ve ever received, even though it’s a comparison no one could ever hope to live up to.”

    The official Broadway *Rocky Horror Picture Show* account also paid tribute, saying Curry “gave the world a little more freedom, a little more fearlessness, and through the tears in our eyes, the courage to BE IT,” nodding to his iconic line. Comedy legend Carol Burnett, who worked with Curry on *Annie*, noted that “nobody could play lovable villains better than he could.” *Home Alone 2* co-star Rob Schneider called the news “gutting,” writing, “A truly gifted performer of stage and screen, his one eyebrow could say more than most actors entire bodies. I am grateful to have the rare gift of watching him work, he made you better just standing near him.”

    Michael McKean, Curry’s co-star from *Clue*, shared that his final conversation with the actor centered on “life and love and laughter,” adding “The grim physical state he found himself in has now ended, a blessing. Our blessing was that we had Tim Curry in our lives. RIP, my friend.” Grand Central Publishing, which released Curry’s memoir, released a statement calling him a “singular talent” whose work left an “indelible mark on generations of audiences.”

    In an official statement released after his death, Curry’s representatives highlighted his five-decade career moving seamlessly between comedy, horror, drama, and music, noting, “Few actors can claim to have left as many distinct fingerprints on pop culture – and though he suffered a debilitating stroke in 2012, he continued adding to his achievements as an artist and, most recently, a writer. Though widely known for his inimitable, flamboyant characters and colorful stage performances, his greatest legacies to those who knew him were his curious, expansive mind and generous, gentle heart, both of which remained open and filled with anticipation until his final breath.”

    Local law enforcement confirmed to BBC News that officers responded to a death investigation at the address Tuesday evening at 23:23 local time, matching the details of Curry’s age and place of death.

  • US designates Palestine Action a terrorist group

    US designates Palestine Action a terrorist group

    In a sweeping new move targeting groups it labels as far-left terrorist organizations, the Trump administration has imposed sweeping economic sanctions on UK-based advocacy group Palestine Action, formally designating the entity as a terrorist organization. The U.S. Department of the Treasury made the announcement Wednesday, confirming that the agency had activated its full regulatory and economic toolset to target the group.

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized in his official statement that the designation sends a clear warning to radical left networks, their affiliated front organizations, and supporting actors. “Far-left extremists, their fronts, and their enablers should be on notice: We will bring the full weight of our economic tools to bear,” Bessent said. “Political terrorism has no place in our society, and we will continue to cut the financial lifelines of these groups until they are eliminated.”

    Per the Treasury Department’s accusations, Palestine Action has backed multiple acts the U.S. classifies as terrorism dating back to July 2020. These alleged activities include attacks that physically injured British law enforcement personnel, disruptive actions intended to intimidate legally operating commercial businesses, and coordinated campaigns to pressure the UK government into changing its policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The group has long organized so-called direct action protests targeting arms companies in the UK that maintain business ties with Israel.

    Palestine Action already faced a full domestic ban in the UK, which went into effect in 2025 under the country’s existing counter-terrorism legislation. The group has mounted a sustained legal challenge to overturn that ban, with its case working its way through the British court system. Earlier this year in June, UK Court of Appeal judges ruled that the government’s ban represented a “justified and proportionate” limitation on the group’s freedom of expression rights. Despite that setback, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has since granted Palestine Action permission to appeal that ruling.

    The June court ruling came on the heels of another legal development for the group: four Palestine Action members were sentenced to prison terms for breaking into a UK defense facility, causing more than £1 million in property damage. One of the four was additionally convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm on a police officer after striking the officer with a sledgehammer during the incident.

    Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, has pushed back fiercely against the new U.S. sanctions. In a social media post responding to the designation, Ammori — who identifies as a Palestinian-Iraqi activist — condemned the move as an act of staggering hypocrisy. “As a Palestinian and Iraqi, the fact the country which destroyed both my homelands is calling me a terrorist, is beyond hypocritical,” she wrote. Speaking to the BBC in an interview, Ammori defended the group’s activities, arguing that all of Palestine Action’s work has been focused on protecting civilian lives. She added that both the UK ban and the new U.S. designation should serve as a “wake-up call to anyone who cares about free speech and democracy.”

    Wednesday’s sanctions against Palestine Action marks the latest step in a broader push by the Trump administration to impose penalties on far-left organizations the U.S. classifies as terrorist networks across the globe.

  • Olympic champion Liu announces break from competition

    Olympic champion Liu announces break from competition

    Fresh off a historic double gold performance at the 2026 Milano Cortina Winter Olympics, 21-year-old American figure skating star Alysa Liu has announced she will step away from competitive competition for the 2026-27 season to refine her craft, a decision that pauses her dominant run just months after her career-defining Olympic victory.

    Liu made history at this year’s Milano Cortina Games, becoming the first American woman since 2002 to claim Olympic gold in the women’s singles event. She also added a second gold medal to her collection as a key contributor to Team USA’s win in the Olympic team event, capping a remarkable comeback story that began four years earlier.

    In a public Instagram post shared with her fans, Liu explained her choice to pause competitive play, emphasizing her commitment to personal and artistic growth within the sport. “I always want to challenge myself in new ways, so my artistry & skating can evolve. It’s important to me that my sport reflects my personal growth,” she wrote. “I’m gonna take the time to recalibrate, fine-tune things & whatnot. So fear not, I’ll be back, & in the meantime I’ll be rooting for my teammates near & far.”

    The break means Liu will not compete at the upcoming 2027 World Figure Skating Championships scheduled for March in Finland. In a subsequent interview with U.S. broadcaster NBC, Liu expanded on her reasoning, noting the decision aligns with her logical, emotional, and physical needs as an athlete. “Logically and emotionally and physically, this just makes the most sense,” she said. “I will miss seeing the international competitors at all the international (competitions), but there will be more, so it’s fine.”

    This planned hiatus is not the first time Liu has stepped away from competitive skating, a path that has been marked by early prodigy success and unexpected turns. A once-in-a-generation young talent, Liu made history in 2019 when she became the youngest U.S. national champion in history at just 13 years old. In a shock announcement that stunned the figure skating world in 2022, the 16-year-old Liu announced her full retirement from the sport. But her love for skating brought her back to competition in a sensational comeback: she claimed the world championship title in her first season back, before parlaying that momentum into Olympic gold in 2026.

  • Trump officials threaten Kennedy Center demolition if court blocks renovations

    Trump officials threaten Kennedy Center demolition if court blocks renovations

    A bitter legal conflict over the future of Washington D.C.’s iconic John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts has escalated dramatically, with court filings revealing the second Trump administration is threatening to raze the historic venue if court-ordered restrictions on its proposed renaming and renovation are not lifted.

    The dispute traces back to late May 2025, when a federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump’s name had been added to the center’s facade illegally. Under U.S. law, the Kennedy Center is designated a permanent memorial to assassinated former President John F. Kennedy, and any official name change requires explicit congressional approval. Following the judge’s order, Trump’s name was removed from the building in June.

    Weeks later, the Kennedy Center’s board of directors — whose majority of pro-Trump members were appointed by the president himself — voted to reverse course, reinstating Trump’s name and approving a two-year full closure to carry out a sweeping structural renovation. The ruling from the May court order blocked this action, prompting the U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the administration, to file new court documents escalating the standoff.

    In the filings, Justice Department attorneys have made two core demands: first, that the court reverse its earlier ruling and allow the board to re-add Trump’s name to the building. Second, they argue that blocking the proposed renovation will force the administration’s hand. “Without the planned rehabilitation work, the venue will continue to deteriorate into an unsafe, decrepit structure that will be required to be taken down,” the administration’s legal team argued, adding that the aging building is “embarrassing to the Nation’s Capital.”

    Justice Department attorney Brantley Mayers laid out the administration’s post-demolition plans in the filing: after the existing structure is torn down, officials will open a public consultation process to determine what new development will replace it. One leading option under consideration is construction of a large outdoor amphitheater with unobstructed views of the Potomac River, Mayers wrote.

    The administration’s legal team also warned of broader financial consequences if the court upholds its original ruling, arguing that a block on recognizing Trump’s involvement would drive away major donors, dry up critical private funding for the project, and bring all planned structural repair work to a halt.

    This high-stakes clash over the Kennedy Center is just the latest in a string of controversial infrastructure and branding projects Trump has pursued since returning to the White House in 2025. Since his inauguration, the president has overseen renovations to the National Mall’s iconic Reflecting Pool, proposed construction of a 250-foot victory arch in the capital, ordered the demolition of the White House East Wing to build a new presidential ballroom, and pushed to add his name to multiple federal institutions including the Kennedy Center and the U.S. Institute of Peace.

  • How Dolly Parton became a fashion icon

    How Dolly Parton became a fashion icon

    For decades, Dolly Parton has been far more than just a legendary country music vocalist and songwriter. Beyond her chart-topping hits and signature gravelly vocals, the cultural icon has built a lasting legacy through one surprising avenue: her one-of-a-kind personal style that has redefined what it means to be a fashion trailblazer. In a new exploration of Parton’s decades-long career, BBC culture correspondent Noor Nanji dives into how the star’s unapologetically bold aesthetic cemented her status as a global fashion icon, turning a signature look into a cultural movement.

    Long before celebrity branding and curated personal style became ubiquitous in the entertainment industry, Parton crafted an image that was entirely her own. Rejecting the understated, conservative aesthetic that dominated the country music scene in her early career, she leaned into exaggerated, unapologetic glamour: sky-high blonde bouffants, form-fitting sequined gowns, statement rhinestone jewelry, and sky-high platform heels that became instantly recognizable to fans around the world. What many early critics dismissed as over-the-top spectacle, Parton framed as an extension of her personality — a celebration of joy, self-acceptance, and intentional self-expression that resonated far beyond country music circles.

    Nanji’s analysis traces how Parton’s style evolved alongside her career, adapting to changing cultural trends while never losing its core authenticity. From her early days performing at the Grand Ole Opry to her recent induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, Parton has used fashion to challenge stereotypes about working-class Southern women, country music performers, and aging in the public eye. Unlike many celebrities who conform to industry standards of beauty as they age, Parton has continued to embrace her bold look, turning down pressure to tone down her style at any age.

    What has made Parton’s impact on fashion so enduring, experts note, is her ability to balance accessibility with boundary-pushing creativity. She has never positioned her style as unattainable for ordinary fans; instead, her willingness to lean into kitsch, sparkle, and over-the-top details has encouraged generations of creators and fashion lovers to embrace their own unique taste, regardless of mainstream approval. Modern designers from Marc Jacobs to Christian Siriano have cited Parton as a key influence, drawing on her love of glamour and unapologetic self-expression in their own collections.

    Today, as the fashion industry continues to shift toward celebrating individuality and authenticity over rigid beauty standards, Parton’s status as a fashion icon only grows stronger. What began as a personal branding choice for a young country singer from Tennessee has turned into a lasting cultural legacy, proving that style is about far more than clothes — it is about telling the world who you are on your own terms.

  • Meta agrees to pay up to $16.7bn to settle social media case

    Meta agrees to pay up to $16.7bn to settle social media case

    One of the world’s largest social media conglomerates, Meta, has finalized a landmark legal settlement with a bipartisan coalition of 52 U.S. states, territories and the District of Columbia to resolve a high-profile lawsuit centered on failures to protect children and teens on its flagship platforms Facebook and Instagram.

    According to official court filings, the company is on the hook to pay up to $16.68 billion (£12.26 billion), a sum Meta itself clarified will be disbursed in annual installments spread across a 10-year period. The funds will be allocated to state priorities including youth online safety programs, marking one of the largest financial resolutions ever reached in a tech industry youth protection case.

    Beyond the financial penalty, the settlement imposes sweeping new mandatory safety measures designed to limit underage users’ exposure to harm on Meta’s platforms. Key requirements include daily screen time limits for teenage accounts, automatic night-time usage blocks, restricted access to platforms during standard school hours, enhanced parental oversight tools, and more rigorous age verification processes to stop children from creating accounts under false ages.

    The legal action, brought by state attorneys general, accused Meta of violating multiple federal and state privacy regulations designed to protect minors. Plaintiffs alleged the company deliberately built platform algorithms to entice, engage, and ultimately ensnare young users, while deliberately turning a blind eye to well-documented harms to the mental and physical health of America’s youth. Meta has consistently denied any wrongdoing, and said it agreed to the settlement to avoid prolonged legal conflict.

    Following the announcement of the agreement, District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb framed the resolution as a transformative win for public health. “The safety features Meta is required to install will fundamentally and immediately change how young people use Instagram and Facebook,” Schwalb said.

    In its own official statement, Meta framed the settlement as an extension of its existing work to support teen wellbeing and give parents more control over their children’s online activity. The company also called on its major industry competitors, TikTok and YouTube, to adopt identical safety frameworks for their own underage user bases.

    “Our new Time Limit commitments, Night Mode features and usage limits during school hours set the right path forward for our whole industry, but this framework will only work if all our peers join us,” said Meta Chief Legal Officer CJ Mahoney. As of the settlement announcement, representatives for both TikTok and YouTube have been contacted for comment but have not yet released a public response.

  • How Dolly Parton helped the world – from children’s books to supporting Covid vaccine

    How Dolly Parton helped the world – from children’s books to supporting Covid vaccine

    Dolly Parton, the globally beloved country music icon whose name is synonymous with chart-topping hits and warm Southern charisma, leaves behind far more than a legendary entertainment career: a decades-long legacy of grassroots philanthropy that has transformed millions of lives across the United States and beyond. Though Parton passed away recently, her team’s request that fans honor her memory by donating to her signature initiative, the Imagination Library, ensures her work will continue lifting up communities for generations to come.

    Born the fourth of 12 children in a cramped one-bedroom cabin in Tennessee’s Smoky Mountains, Parton grew up immersed in working-class poverty. Her father, Robert Lee Parton, a hardworking tobacco farmer, was unable to read or write—a barrier that the young Dolly watched prevent him from achieving all his dreams. That experience would shape the core of her charitable work for the rest of her life. “He was the smartest man I have ever known but I know in my heart his inability to read probably kept him from fulfilling all of his dreams,” Parton once wrote. In 1988, she turned that motivation into action, founding the Dollywood Foundation to expand access to life-changing educational opportunities for children.

    Seven years later, in 1995, the foundation launched the Imagination Library, Parton’s most far-reaching philanthropic project. Designed to foster early literacy, the program mails a free, personalized book every month to every child under the age of five, starting from birth. What began as a small local initiative limited to Sevier County, Parton’s hometown, quickly expanded across the U.S., then crossed borders to reach Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Australia. To date, the program has distributed more than 332.4 million free books, putting a personalized, owned book into the hands of children who have never had a book of their own before. “They get this little book with their little name on it in the mail, and they feel special… they know that somebody out there is thinking of them,” Parton explained of the program’s quiet power.

    The Imagination Library has earned widespread praise from educators, authors, and community leaders around the world. Scottish councillor Lee Mills, a lifelong Parton fan who brought the program to Dundee after his election, noted: “Dolly’s legacy will last with every page turned of a children’s book. I will do my utmost best to ensure that this is delivered to every child in Scotland.” For British author Selina Brown, whose children’s book *My Rice is Best* was selected for distribution, the program does more than boost literacy—it advances critical representation in children’s publishing. “For my book in particular, the protagonist is black. It helps with representation, it helps with real life situations and having a book that speaks directly to you and speaks to a different world is important,” Brown told the BBC.

    Early literacy was far from Parton’s only educational focus. In the early 1990s, she launched an innovative high school graduation incentive program in Sevier County: every 12- to 14-year-old student who stayed in school to graduate would receive $500, with a peer buddy system to keep students accountable. Though Parton joked the initiative was a “bribe,” it delivered transformative results: the county’s high school dropout rate plummeted from 35% to just 6%, according to foundation data. More recently, in 2022, Parton extended educational support to adult learners, announcing that all Dollywood employees—seasonal, part-time, and full-time alike—would have 100% of their college tuition and textbook costs covered if they chose to pursue further education. The foundation also runs an annual scholarship program that awards $15,000 to five graduating high school seniors pursuing personal and professional dreams.

    Beyond education, Parton’s giving extended to medical research, disaster relief, and wildlife conservation. When the COVID-19 pandemic shut down the world in 2020, Parton donated $1 million to Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, funding early-stage research that was critical to the development of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, which ultimately reached 95% efficacy against severe disease. To encourage vaccine uptake, she even reworked the lyrics to her iconic hit *Jolene*, famously singing, “vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, I’m begging of you, please don’t hesitate,” before sharing a video of herself receiving the injection. This contribution was just one of many major gifts to medical causes: a 2007 benefit concert raised $1 million for a new Sevier County hospital and cancer center that includes the Dolly Parton Center for Women’s Services; in 2017, after her niece received leukemia treatment at Nashville’s Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital, she donated $1 million to the facility, followed by a second $1 million gift years later to fund pediatric infectious disease research. Earlier this year, East Tennessee Children’s Hospital announced it would be renamed the Dolly Parton Children’s Hospital in recognition of her decades-long partnership and support.

    When disaster struck her home state, Parton was always one of the first to step up. After a devastating 2016 wildfire destroyed hundreds of homes in Sevier County, she organized a star-studded telethon that raised more than $13 million, then pledged $1,000 a month for six months to nearly 900 displaced families. When Middle Tennessee suffered catastrophic flooding in 2021, she helped raise $700,000 to support affected residents. She has also partnered with the American Eagle Foundation to host the world’s largest sanctuary for non-releasable bald eagles at her Dollywood amusement park. The sanctuary’s breeding and rehabilitation work contributed to the recovery of the species, which was removed from the U.S. endangered species list in 2007.

    Throughout her life, Parton earned widespread recognition for her generosity, including the 2022 Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy, which honored her as “one of the entertainment world’s most generous philanthropists.” For Parton, giving was not just a public gesture—it was a core part of who she was. “I’m kind of addicted to the feeling of giving,” she once said. “Knowing that I’m doing something good for someone else.” She often spoke of her hope that her work would outlive her, writing that her father, who inspired the Imagination Library, was prouder of that initiative than he ever was of her entertainment career. When announcing her death, her team echoed that vision, asking fans to forgo sending flowers and instead donate to the Imagination Library to carry her work forward. “When I’m done, I can rest in peace knowing I’ve done my best,” Parton once said. “I hope that when my time comes, I’ll leave something behind that others can use to lift themselves up.” That vision, it seems, is already secured.

  • Heart, hope and a steely determination: Dolly Parton’s musical legacy

    Heart, hope and a steely determination: Dolly Parton’s musical legacy

    Dolly Parton, the one-of-a-kind country music legend whose career spanned seven decades and reshaped both the music industry and conversations around gender and worker rights, leaves behind an unparalleled legacy as both an artist and a trailblazer.

    Few of Parton’s hits carry the layered history and cultural weight of 9 to 5, the iconic theme song for the 1980 comedy film of the same name, her first major Hollywood project. The song’s origin story is as memorable as its catchy hook: while on set, Parton could not access her banned guitar, so she created the track’s distinct beat by strumming her acrylic nails together, mimicking the clack of a typewriter that matched her character’s experience as an overworked, underappreciated office secretary facing constant belittlement and sexual harassment from her male boss. Immediately recognizing she had created something special, she ran to share the unfinished song with co-stars Lily Tomlin and Jane Fonda, who also produced the film. Fonda later recalled that both she and Tomlin were instantly moved, knowing the track was far more than a movie theme—it was an anthem for working women everywhere. When 9 to 5 was released in November 1980, it became Parton’s only solo number-one hit on the U.S. charts and earned her an Academy Award nomination for Best Original Song. Beyond its commercial success, the track’s legacy lies in its unflinching take on working-class struggle and gender inequality in corporate spaces. On the surface, the jaunty, infectious chorus (“Working 9 to 5 / What a way to make a living!”) resonates as a universal nod to the drudgery of daily work, but deeper lyrics reveal a quiet, righteous fury: “It’s a rich man’s game, no matter what they call it / And you spend your life putting money in his wallet. They just use your mind and they never give you credit.” Those words gave voice to widespread unspoken frustrations among working women, a testament to Parton’s skill at wrapping sharp social commentary in accessible, memorable melody. What many listeners miss, however, is that this quiet anger was rooted in Parton’s own lifelong experience navigating the rampant sexism of the music industry, which she began facing as a 13-year-old rising performer.

    Parton’s path to stardom was forged through repeated stands against industry exploitation, a pattern of courage that paved the way for future generations of female artists. Her first major break came in 1967, when she was hired as the “girl singer” on the nationally syndicated Porter Wagoner Show, which brought her talent into millions of American homes each week. Over the next decade, the pair released 21 hit duets, and as Parton’s star grew to outshine Wagoner, she made the difficult decision to launch a solo career—writing the timeless ballad *I Will Always Love You* as a heartfelt farewell and apology to her mentor. Instead of accepting her departure graciously, Wagoner sued Parton for breach of contract in 1979, demanding $3 million in damages. Eager to avoid a lengthy, career-derailing court battle, Parton settled for roughly $1 million, a choice she never regretted. “I made up my mind that if he could live with it, I could live without it,” she wrote in her autobiography, adding, “I am neither his conscience nor his accountant.” True to her trademark graciousness, Parton never held a grudge, continuing to credit Wagoner for giving her her first big break, but she never let goodwill override her commitment to protecting her work and her autonomy. That conviction was tested again just a few years later, when Elvis Presley expressed interest in covering *I Will Always Love You*. Parton was elated at the opportunity, but just one day before the scheduled recording session, Presley’s manager Colonel Tom Parker delivered an ultimatum: Elvis would only record the track if Parton surrendered half of the song’s lucrative publishing rights. Parton refused, explaining that she intended to leave the rights to her family as a legacy. Though she cried all night after the deal fell through and always wondered what Presley’s version would have sounded like, she never questioned her choice. That decision ultimately paid off decades later, when Whitney Houston recorded her record-breaking cover of the track for 1992’s *The Bodyguard* soundtrack. Because Parton retained full publishing rights, she earned enough from the hit to buy Presley’s iconic Graceland mansion. Instead of keeping the windfall for herself, she invested the proceeds into a majority-Black neighborhood in Nashville, Tennessee—a intentional choice to honor Houston’s legacy.

    That willingness to stand up for artistic autonomy inspired countless women who followed in her footsteps, most notably Taylor Swift, who re-recorded her entire early catalog to reclaim control of her work from private equity firms that purchased her master recordings. When asked about Swift’s campaign, Parton praised her openly: “Smart! She’s so smart, she’s so great, she’s genius. I mean really, look at what she’s doing! That’s amazing!” After Parton’s passing, Swift honored the trailblazer, crediting Parton’s “backbone of steel” in the lifelong fight “to defend her own self worth as an artist.”

    Beyond her industry activism, Parton’s musical legacy is defined by her unparalleled ability to turn quiet, everyday moments and personal stories into universally resonant art. She wrote her first song at just six years old: *Little Tiny Tasseltop*, a tender ode to her favorite doll with corn-silk hair. That commitment to drawing from personal experience shaped her entire discography. Her 1971 classic *Coat of Many Colors* tells a deeply moving story of childhood poverty and pride, centered on a hand-sewn coat her mother made for her when her family could not afford store-bought clothes. The 1974 concept album *My Tennessee Mountain Home* is a full musical autobiography, opening with a recording of the first letter Parton wrote home after moving to Nashville as a teenager, where she reassured her family she would be fine even if success took time. The album cover featured a photograph of the two-room log cabin that was her actual childhood home, and its lyrics frame her humble upbringing not as a hardship, but as a source of joy and community: “We might have been poor but we didn’t know it / We’d heard that word but we didn’t know what it meant.”

    This diaristic, personal songwriting style produced some of the most beloved hits in country music history, from *Jolene*—the haunting story of a red-headed woman threatening Parton’s marriage—to *All I Can Do*, a tender love letter to her long-time husband Carl Dean. Even as her over-the-top stage costumes and signature blonde bouffant became cultural touchstones, her lyrics remained rooted in raw, relatable authenticity. Long before 9 to 5 cemented her status as a feminist voice, Parton was pushing back against gendered double standards in tracks like *When Possession Gets Too Strong* and *Just Because I’m A Woman*, which challenged the idea that women should be judged more harshly for their mistakes than men: “My mistakes are no worse than yours / Just because I’m a woman.” At a time when the music industry forced women into narrow, limiting stereotypes—housewife, temptress, fallen woman—Parton leaned into the performative nature of these roles to satirize them, while never hiding her core strength. On 2008’s *Backwood Barbie*, she sang, “I’ve always been misunderstood because of how I look. Don’t judge me by the cover, cos I’m a real good book”—a message that inspired generations of women to reject others’ expectations and embrace their true selves.

    Even as the country music establishment leaned heavily into conservative politics in later decades, Parton used her platform to unite diverse audiences. In a 2002 performance at Los Angeles’ House of Blues, she playfully changed the lyrics of *Jolene* to center a drag queen, to the delight of the crowd of drag performers in attendance. Beyond music, Parton’s philanthropic work touched millions of lives: she funded scholarships for low-income students and built the Imagination Library, which has delivered more than 200 million free books to young readers across the world.

    No other star has ever been able to replicate Parton’s magic, and no successor was ever billed as “the next Dolly Parton”—for good reason. She was one of a kind: irreplaceable, unapologetic, and unforgettable. A legend in her own lifetime, her legacy will continue to resonate for generations to come.

  • Darline Graham wins primary to contest late brother’s US Senate seat

    Darline Graham wins primary to contest late brother’s US Senate seat

    In a high-stakes primary election that has underscored former President Donald Trump’s enduring hold over the U.S. Republican Party, South Carolina voters have tapped Darline Graham — the younger sister of late longtime Senator Lindsey Graham — as the party’s nominee for the November U.S. Senate general election. Graham, who has never before campaigned for public office, was appointed as an interim senator in July to finish out her brother’s term following his unexpected sudden death that month, and her successful bid for the permanent nomination came with robust, high-profile support from Trump, who traveled to the state to rally voters on her behalf.

    With vote counting nearly completed, CBS News — the U.S. partner of the BBC — projects Graham secured 52.5% of the Republican primary vote, beating out a challenge from hardline right-wing incumbent Congressman Ralph Norman. A fellow Trump ally who has supported the majority of the former president’s policy agenda, Norman attempted to frame Graham as a tool of establishment Washington insiders during the campaign. The head-to-head runoff was triggered after the two candidates finished as the top two vote-getters in an earlier crowded primary contest held earlier this month. Norman’s 2024 decision to initially back Nikki Haley, Trump’s rival for the Republican presidential nomination, is widely seen as having undermined his standing with party loyalists, opening a door for Trump’s endorsement to carry Graham to victory.

    Graham’s victory has already been interpreted by political observers as clear proof of Trump’s unbroken influence over the national Republican Party, even as the 2026 midterm elections enter their final stretch. Graham acknowledged her lack of traditional political experience during the primary campaign, a gap that became a central point of discussion after she stumbled while answering a foreign policy question during a televised debate. When pressed to outline the U.S. policy position on Taiwan, Graham admitted openly: “I’m not that informed on national security. National security is not my thing, not my area of expertise, but I do support the military.” Following her win, Graham took to the social platform X to share her reaction, thanking her supporters and Trump, and saying she was “deeply honoured and humbled” by the outcome of the vote.

    Political analysts widely predict Graham will win the November general election, noting that South Carolina has not elected a Democratic candidate to the U.S. Senate in more than 70 years, making the solidly red state unlikely to flip to Democrats this cycle. Beyond South Carolina, Tuesday’s primaries marked a key testing ground for Trump’s political clout in other Republican contests across the country. In Oklahoma, another deep red state, Trump-endorsed former state lawmaker Mike Mazzei faced off against incumbent state Attorney General Gentner Drummond for the Republican gubernatorial nomination; the winner of that contest is all but guaranteed to win the general election in November. For the national political landscape, the 2026 midterm elections as a whole will determine which party holds a majority in both chambers of the U.S. Congress, a balance of power that will shape the entire second half of Trump’s current presidential term.

    South Carolina was not the only state holding special elections on Tuesday to fill seats left vacant by sitting lawmakers’ deaths. In the Atlanta, Georgia area, voters cast ballots to replace Democratic Congressman David Scott, who died in office back in April. Scott’s daughter, Marcye Scott, joined the crowded field of candidates seeking to finish out the final months of his term, which ends in January. However, U.S. media projections show that she was defeated by opponent Everton Blair, who will serve out the remaining months of the term, with a new general election for a full two-year term set for November.

  • Canada’s retaliation tests the limit of American power under Trump

    Canada’s retaliation tests the limit of American power under Trump

    The fragile landscape of US-Canada trade relations collapsed abruptly over the weekend, with a leaked set of private comments from US Vice-President JD Vance adding fuel to already tense negotiations that ultimately ended in a full breakdown and new reciprocal tariffs.

    Two days before Canadian negotiators walked away from the table, Vance told attendees at a closed-door private fundraiser that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was a “very sweet guy” who puts on a tough performance to outmatch former president and current White House incumbent Donald Trump. Vance dismissed this posturing as hilarious, adding that Canadian officials ultimately back down on most contentious trade issues. The private remarks, captured on an audio recording leaked to Canada’s national press, spread rapidly across Canadian media outlets. While analysts do not label the comments as the direct cause of the negotiation breakdown, they are widely agreed to have poisoned the atmosphere for talks.

    The sudden end to negotiations for a updated bilateral trade deal has triggered a new cycle of retaliatory tariffs between the two countries, which share more than $872 billion in annual two-way trade. This deepening rift is the latest example of the second Trump administration’s approach to global diplomacy, which applies aggressive pressure to both allies and adversaries alike – and underscores the significant unintended disruptive risks that come with this strategy.

    What is more, the Trump administration’s core assumption that Canada would quickly cave to US pressure, as many other US allies have done over the past 19 months of Trump’s second term, appears to be a critical miscalculation. The fallout from this misjudgment could shape bilateral relations for the remainder of Trump’s presidency.

    Cross-border trade friction between the two nations is not a new development. Tensions stretch back to Trump’s first term, when the United States renegotiated the 1990s North American Free Trade Agreement into the updated US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, a process marked by open personal friction between Trump and then-Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau. Ahead of Trump’s 2024 return to the White House, he infamously mocked Trudeau as the “governor” of America’s so-called 51st state, Canada.

    These public insults reflect a broader Trump administration geopolitical framework that frames the US as the dominant hemispheric power entitled to exert political, military and economic influence over its immediate neighbors. Senior administration officials have repeatedly argued that Canada contributes far too little to regional collective defense while reaping outsized economic benefits from open trade with the US. In Trump’s worldview, economic security and national security are inseparable, making Canada and Mexico – America’s two largest trading partners – natural early targets for renegotiation and pressure. This same framework underpinned Trump’s public comment that he wanted to acquire Greenland from Denmark.

    “If you listen to really anybody in state, treasury, or commerce [departments], you will hear the phrase ‘economic security is national security’,” explained Drew Delong, head of corporate statecraft at the Kearney Foresight think tank.

    By the start of 2026, while North American trade negotiations lurched forward in uneven stops and starts, Trump’s foreign policy attention shifted away from Canada to military interventions in Venezuela and later the Middle East. Even across disparate regions, however, the core pillar of Trump’s international strategy remains unchanged: the US is a global power that can impose its will to advance its own national interests. But this approach is increasingly running into hard limits, and Trump’s second term has become a sustained test of where those boundaries lie.

    While there are obvious gaps between an active military conflict in Iran and a trade dispute with a close neighbor, the core strategic lesson is surprisingly similar: in both cases, the US faces a counterpart that, despite holding far less overall power, still retains meaningful tools to retaliate against American pressure. For Iran, that leverage comes from targeting US regional allies and disrupting global energy trade by threatening the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints. For Canada, that means leveraging its position as a key economic and trade partner to inflict tangible damage on the US economy. Canada’s new round of targeted tariffs, announced this week, is just the first step; future measures could include cutting off US access to Canadian energy supplies, critical mineral exports, and even widespread consumer boycotts of American-made goods.

    “As the broader world shifts into a more economic security theatre, you see this game of chokepoints and leverage angles continue to pan out across supply chains,” DeLong noted, adding that nations around the globe are now actively identifying these tools to push back against great power pressure.

    At present, clear offramps to de-escalation are scarce. Trump has ramped up his aggressive rhetoric, repeatedly claiming Canada is “ripping off” the US economy, while Ontario Premier Doug Ford responded with a blunt rebuke, telling the American president to “kiss my ass”.

    “Every time we push allies and partners away, I think we incentivise them to look for new relationships and new partnerships rather than trying to acquiesce to US demands,” said Imran Bayoumi, deputy director of the GeoStrategy Initiative at the Atlantic Council.

    Despite the escalating rhetoric, there remains a window for cooler heads to restart negotiations. Canada’s new tariffs will not go into effect for another two weeks, and the Trump administration’s most significant proposed retaliatory measure – a 25% universal tariff on all Canadian-built vehicles and auto parts – will not take effect until early 2027. While cycles of escalation are notoriously difficult to break in any conflict, whether economic or military, this multi-month gap before the next major tariff increase gives negotiating teams time to restart discussions. Before the breakdown late last week, talks had actually been showing incremental signs of progress.

    The more pressing timeline shaping the current standoff is the upcoming November 2026 US midterm elections. If Democrats score major congressional victories, they could significantly curtail Trump’s policy authority. Conversely, unexpected strong results for Republicans would likely embolden the White House to take an even harder line with Canada. Right now, the Canadian government in Ottawa is betting on a Democratic wave, calculating that Trump will back down before election day to avoid economic pain for voters in key industrial swing states such as Michigan and Ohio that would be hit hard by continuing trade tensions.

    “I don’t think there’s the kind of internal political divisions in Canada that maybe the Trump administration would have expected,” Bayoumi said. “I think Carney has a lot of political runway to really get a good deal for Canada and not settle for anything less.”

    Still, another long-term outcome is increasingly possible, one that Prime Minister Carney has publicly acknowledged since Trump returned to office: Canada could permanently shift its economic and diplomatic alignment away from the United States, deliberately widening the gap between the two nations. “We cannot depend on traditional alliances when the rules of the game have fundamentally changed,” Carney has argued. While geographic proximity will ensure the two countries remain tied in many ways, the deeply integrated bilateral economic relationship built over the past three decades may be reaching its end.

    This trajectory puts Canada in stark contrast to Mexico, which has moved toward closer economic integration with the US in recent months. Meanwhile, other US allies across Europe and Asia are closely watching Canada’s confrontational approach to Washington as a potential blueprint for their own future dealings with the Trump administration.

    “Ten years from now, this is going to be taught in classrooms,” DeLong said. “You have these bifurcating paths within North America, and the question is: Are they going to come back together, or is this going to continue to split? And if it does, who benefits most in the long run?”

    If even traditionally diplomatic, close ally Canada is willing to stand up to a more aggressive United States, other nations may well draw the same conclusion and follow suit.