标签: North America

北美洲

  • Jurors in Lindsay Clancy trial deadlocked but judge asks them to keep trying

    Jurors in Lindsay Clancy trial deadlocked but judge asks them to keep trying

    After three full days of closed-door deliberations, the jury hearing the high-profile triple murder case against Massachusetts resident Lindsay Clancy has failed to reach a unanimous verdict, leaving the court in shock on Tuesday. Despite the impasse, the presiding judge has instructed the panel to continue their deliberations in an effort to resolve the deadlock.

    Clancy, a 36-year-old former nurse, stands accused of killing her three young children at the family’s Massachusetts home in 2023, and faces three counts of first-degree murder. Prosecutors with the commonwealth’s legal team have argued that Clancy carried out the killings in a premeditated, intentional act that meets the legal standard for first-degree homicide. Her defense team does not contest that Clancy caused the deaths of her children, but has centered its entire case on the argument that she was suffering severe, untreated postpartum psychosis at the time of the incident. This condition, the defense argues, left Clancy unable to distinguish right from wrong, negating the criminal intent required for a first-degree murder conviction.

    The 12-member jury, made up of nine women and three men, began deliberations last week, wrapping up weeks of testimony from more than 50 witnesses called by both the prosecution and defense. When Judge William Sullivan read the jury’s note announcing the deadlock to the court, audible gasps from spectators filled the courtroom. Clancy, who appeared in court seated in a wheelchair beside her legal counsel, remained stoic as the announcement was made.

    Legal experts note that jury deadlocks are a far from uncommon outcome in high-stakes, emotionally fraught criminal cases, and the court system has established long-standing protocols for addressing such impasses. Heather Cucolo, a professor at New York Law School and a leading expert in mental health law, explained to media outlets that hung juries are particularly typical of what she described as “complex and emotionally charged trials” such as Clancy’s.

    “If the deadlock does not break, the judge may issue what is commonly called a ‘dynamite instruction’ – known as a Tuey-Rodriguez charge in Massachusetts state courts – which encourages jurors to reconsider opposing perspectives in an effort to reach a consensus, while still upholding each juror’s right to their own honest conviction,” Cucolo explained. She added, however, that this kind of additional instruction is typically only deployed as a last-ditch effort to avoid a mistrial.

    If the jury ultimately convicts Clancy on all three first-degree murder charges, Massachusetts state law requires a mandatory sentence of life in prison without any possibility of parole. If no verdict can be reached, the case will result in a mistrial, leaving open the possibility that prosecutors would have to try Clancy again at a later date.

  • Trump says US position on Falklands ‘one of many’ under review

    Trump says US position on Falklands ‘one of many’ under review

    In a development that has sparked cross-party friction in British politics, former U.S. President Donald Trump has confirmed that the United States’ longstanding ambiguous stance on the Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute is “one of many” international positions currently under formal review, as the U.S. presses the United Kingdom to accelerate its planned increases to NATO-aligned defence spending.

    The confirmation follows a weeks-old report from The Daily Telegraph, which first revealed that senior U.S. defence officials were drafting a set of proposals designed to pressure NATO allies into meeting their mandatory 2% of GDP defence spending commitments. Among the leverage options reportedly under consideration was a U.S. shift away from its longstanding neutrality on the Falklands dispute, which could see Washington oppose London’s long-held sovereignty claim over the South Atlantic territory.

    The Falkland Islands, located 300 miles off the southern coast of Argentina, have been the site of a bitter sovereignty dispute between London and Buenos Aires for nearly two centuries. The dispute boiled over into open conflict in 1982, when Argentine military forces invaded the islands to stake the South American nation’s territorial claim. A 74-day British military campaign retook control of the territory, but the conflict left more than 900 people dead – 255 British service members, three civilian islanders, and 649 Argentine military personnel. For decades, successive U.S. administrations have formally recognized the UK’s de facto governance of the islands, but have declined to take an official position on the underlying sovereignty question.

    During a press briefing with reporters on Monday, BBC correspondents asked Trump directly whether his administration was actively reviewing the U.S.’s longstanding position on the dispute. Trump responded simply: “I always review every position. That’s just one of many.” He added that the UK “has got some problems, but they’ll get solved” when pressed for further comment on the link between the review and British defence spending targets.

    Trump’s remarks drew immediate pushback from senior British political figures. Dame Emily Thornberry, the Labour Member of Parliament who chairs the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, dismissed the comments as “nonsense” and called on the UK government to issue an immediate, formal response to the threat from Washington. Responding to the call during Tuesday’s parliamentary session, Foreign Office Minister Uma Kumaran reaffirmed London’s unwavering position on the dispute, telling MPs: “The UK has no doubt about its sovereignty over the Falkland Islands. They are and will always remain a British overseas territory in line with the wishes of the Falkland islanders. The UK is steadfast in our support for the islanders’ rights of self-determination. Our position remains unchanged.” A UK government spokesperson added in a separate statement: “Falkland islanders are British with a right to determine their own future. The islanders have repeatedly expressed their wish to remain a British overseas territory and our commitment to them is unwavering.”

    The current debate around the Falklands is not the first time a potential review of U.S. policy has emerged. Earlier this year, an internal Pentagon email obtained by Reuters revealed the U.S. was considering a range of punitive options against NATO allies that it deemed insufficiently supportive of its military operations in Iran. The Falklands sovereignty position was one of the potential leverage tools listed in that internal correspondence, and the proposal has reemerged in recent reporting tied to the Trump administration’s pressure on NATO members to increase defence spending.

    The row over the Falklands comes as the UK’s new ruling administration works to lock in commitments to raise defence spending in line with NATO demands. New Prime Minister Andy Burnham has pledged to honour a commitment made by his predecessor, former Prime Minister Keir Starmer, to hit a target of 3.5% of GDP for core defence spending by 2035. On Tuesday, Chancellor John Healey told The Times that he would outline a clear, binding timeline to meet that 3.5% target during the next government spending review, scheduled for spring 2026. Healey added that the plan will also include an explicit target date for reaching an interim 3% of GDP spending target. Healey, who served as defence secretary under Starmer, resigned from the previous cabinet in June over a public dispute about military spending timelines, saying in his resignation letter that he was frustrated by the lack of a clear plan to hit the 3% target by 2030, his preferred timeline.

    Beyond the Falklands dispute, the Burnham administration is also facing ongoing political pressure over a stalled plan to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. The 2024 agreement, reached under Starmer, would have seen London hand over control of the Indian Ocean archipelago in exchange for a long-term lease to retain the joint US-UK military base on Diego Garcia, a key strategic logistics hub for U.S. and British military operations across the Middle East and Africa. In April, the deal was paused indefinitely after Trump withdrew U.S. support for the agreement, throwing the entire process into doubt.

    Appearing before the Commons on Tuesday, Kumaran reaffirmed that maintaining long-term operational control and security of the Diego Garcia base remains the UK government’s top priority, and that this goal is the entire foundation of the ongoing negotiations with Mauritius. She added that any funding tied to a final agreement would be covered within existing spending allocations for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and the Ministry of Defence. But the minister’s comments drew fierce criticism from the opposition Conservative Party. James Cartlidge, the Conservative shadow defence secretary, called the existing Chagos agreement “crazy” and said it “belongs on the ash heap of history.” He called on Burnham to “show some backbone” and scrap the deal entirely, reallocating any planned funding for the transfer to the armed forces. Conservative shadow Foreign Office minister Wendy Morton also pressed the government for clarity, noting that the Starmer administration acknowledged in April that the treaty had become “impossible to agree at political level” and asking what had changed to justify continuing negotiations. In response, Kumaran said the Burnham government would “continue to work with the US and Mauritius to find a way forward that is in the UK’s best interests and protects our national security.”

  • US borrowing costs hit fresh highs over inflation fears

    US borrowing costs hit fresh highs over inflation fears

    Renewed military strikes in the Middle East have sent global oil markets into volatility, pushing crude prices above $92 per barrel and amplifying long-running concerns about sticky U.S. inflation. This geopolitical and economic pressure triggered a fresh surge in U.S. government borrowing costs on Tuesday, with the 10-year Treasury yield – the benchmark effective interest rate for U.S. government borrowing – climbing to 4.79%, its highest point since January 2025.

    Beyond impacting how much the federal government pays to access capital, movements in the U.S. bond market have far-reaching ripple effects across the domestic economy. Benchmark Treasury yields directly shape the interest rates consumers pay for everyday forms of borrowing, including home mortgages, auto loans, and credit card balances. Already, 30-year fixed mortgage rates have jumped to nearly 6.7%, a one-year high, following the recent bond market selloff.

    The sharp uptick in borrowing costs has coincided with growing market speculation that the U.S. Federal Reserve will greenlight a new interest rate hike when it meets later this month. Persistent above-target inflation has left policymakers open to further tightening, with top Fed officials signaling that stubborn price growth could force decisive action.

    In a public speech delivered Tuesday, Federal Reserve Governor Michael Barr emphasized that inflation has remained unacceptably elevated for five years. “If it does not cool, then I think we should act decisively to raise rates,” Barr warned. His remarks echoed comments made the previous week by Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh, who told attendees that policymakers would “have work to do” if they cannot confirm that cost-of-living pressures are easing for U.S. households.

    Latest official inflation data puts annual price growth at 3.4% as of July, a full 1.4 percentage points above the Federal Reserve’s longstanding 2% target. Despite this overshoot, the central bank has held its benchmark policy rate steady for months at a range of 3.5% to 3.75%. While Warsh has declined to elaborate on his personal outlook for rate policy, shifting investor expectations following recent official comments have pushed the probability of a September rate hike sharply higher.

    For bond markets, persistent inflation is the core driver of rising yields – the term used to describe the effective interest rate governments pay to investors who buy their debt. When governments issue bonds, they are essentially selling interest-bearing IOUs to raise capital for public spending. Bond investors routinely demand higher yields when inflation is high or projected to stay elevated, to offset the eroding impact of price growth on their future returns. Since U.S. Treasury yields serve as a global benchmark for borrowing, this shift pushes up borrowing costs across nearly every major economy worldwide.

    Inflation is not the only factor weighing on bond investors. Growing anxiety over ballooning government debt levels across the world, paired with uncertainty over the future returns of Big Tech’s massive artificial intelligence investments, has also put upward pressure on yields. In the U.S. specifically, total national debt has crossed the $40 trillion threshold, doubling over the past 10 years under both the Trump and Biden administrations.

    Last week, 30-year Treasury yields reached levels not seen since 2008, prompting a policy response from the Treasury Department. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that the U.S. government would expand debt buyback programs in an effort to cool rising rates. However, the positive market reaction to the announcement faded quickly, leaving yields to resume their upward climb.

    Economists warn that the sustained rise in borrowing costs carries meaningful downside risks for U.S. economic growth. Higher interest rates make both consumer borrowing and business investment less attractive. If households pull back on discretionary spending and companies pause expansion plans in response to elevated rates, the broader economy could slow sharply, tipping the balance between cooling inflation and triggering a downturn.

  • Vance calls Michigan Senate candidate El-Sayed ‘evil’ at campaign rally

    Vance calls Michigan Senate candidate El-Sayed ‘evil’ at campaign rally

    A heated Michigan Senate campaign has devolved into raw personal confrontation this week, after U.S. Vice President JD Vance delivered a blistering attack on Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed at a campaign rally for Republican nominee Mike Rogers in suburban Detroit Monday night. Vance, a close ally of former President Donald Trump, labeled the 41-year-old Muslim candidate “a very, very evil” person seeking to “destroy” the United States, framing El-Sayed as a divisive extremist who represents a dangerous rising force in American politics.

    The vice president’s tirade came after El-Sayed made controversial remarks about Vance’s family, specifically suggesting that Vance’s late grandfather would not accept Usha Vance, the Hindu Second Lady and Vance’s wife. Addressing that comment directly, Vance issued a sharp public warning: “keep my wife’s name the hell out of your mouth.”

    Vance also sought to tie El-Sayed to far-left streamer Hasan Piker, who once claimed the U.S. “deserved” the 9/11 terrorist attacks. El-Sayed appeared alongside Piker during his primary campaign, but has repeatedly denied sharing Piker’s views and publicly distanced himself from the 9/11 comment. Undeterred, Vance repeated unsubstantiated insinuations that El-Sayed sympathizes with terrorists and aligns with anti-American ideology, claiming the candidate sided with attackers over victims of a shooting at a Detroit-area synagogue.

    Within hours, El-Sayed pushed back forcefully against Vance’s accusations during an interview with CNN, turning the “evil” label back on the Trump administration’s policy agenda. He argued that the real harm facing American communities comes from what he called the Trump White House’s unethical policy choices: “Evil is ripping healthcare away from working people in exchange for tax breaks for billionaires. Evil is making people pay more for groceries and gas while pushing for trade wars and actual war. Evil is dividing people for your own gain. Evil is selling out your morals for a little bit of power.”

    El-Sayed also moved to clarify his earlier comments about Usha Vance, explaining that his remarks were never intended as a personal attack. Instead, he said, they were meant to illustrate what he frames as Vance’s core political belief: that some people are inherently “more American than others” based on their identity or background.

    The contest between El-Sayed and Rogers, a long-time former law enforcement official and seasoned political figure, has already become one of the most closely watched races of the 2026 midterm elections. Michigan is a critical battleground state: it went to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election, and flipped back to Donald Trump in 2024, making this Senate seat a key target for both major parties as they fight for control of the upper chamber.

    A recent poll released by Michigan-based research firm Epic-MRA shows the race remains tight, with El-Sayed holding only a narrow four-point lead over his Republican opponent ahead of the general election. The rapid escalation of personal hostility between the candidates has underscored the deep polarization that continues to shape competitive electoral contests across the U.S. ahead of 2026’s voting.

  • Watch: Judge orders deadlocked Clancy jurors to keep deliberating

    Watch: Judge orders deadlocked Clancy jurors to keep deliberating

    A high-profile homicide trial in Massachusetts has hit a procedural snag, after a jury announced it was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the case against Lindsay Clancy. Clancy, a 32-year-old Massachusetts woman, stands accused of murdering her three young children in a tragic 2023 incident that unfolded in the basement of the family’s suburban home.

    Following days of deliberation that saw jurors fail to bridge their divides on a final verdict, the presiding judge made the rare decision to direct the deadlocked panel to return to closed-door deliberations in an effort to find consensus. Court observers confirmed that the instruction came after the jury sent a note to the judge indicating they were stuck and could not agree on a guilty or not guilty finding.

    The case has gripped local communities across the state, with the brutal nature of the alleged crimes sparking widespread public discussion about domestic violence, maternal mental health, and access to psychiatric care for at-risk parents. Legal analysts note that while directing deadlocked jurors to continue deliberating is within a judge’s discretionary authority, the move often raises questions about whether a mistrial will ultimately be declared if the panel remains at an impasse. As of the latest court update, jurors have resumed their deliberations, with the public awaiting a final outcome in one of the most tragic criminal cases the region has seen in recent years.

  • One still missing after Grand Canyon floods kill two and prompts rescue efforts

    One still missing after Grand Canyon floods kill two and prompts rescue efforts

    A brutal flash flood that swept through popular hiking trails at Arizona’s Grand Canyon over the weekend has left two people dead and only one hiker still missing, according to updates from the U.S. National Park Service (NPS). What began as an ordinary Saturday on one of the nation’s most visited natural landmarks quickly turned deadly when the sudden flood hit, destroying critical infrastructure and stranding dozens of visitors in low-lying areas.

    The disaster unfolded around 14:30 local time on Saturday, when intense monsoon rains triggered what the NPS describes as significant flooding in Bright Angel Canyon, the location of the park’s most popular hiking route. Floodwaters surged downstream, sweeping away footbridges, dislodging massive boulders, and cutting off access to popular campgrounds and outposts including Phantom Ranch, the area hardest hit by the disaster. By the time emergency crews arrived, at least two adult males had been killed; the NPS has confirmed one of the victims as a 46-year-old man whose body was recovered near Crystal Rapids along the Colorado River, and officials have declined to release further identifying details at this time.

    When the flood first struck, 30 hikers and visitors were initially unaccounted for. But incident commander Dave Black told reporters at a Monday press briefing that NPS rangers and emergency response crews have worked tirelessly around the clock to locate those missing, reducing the number of unaccounted-for people to just one. “We’ve had a very busy couple of days,” Black noted, praising his teams for their extraordinary efforts to get the rapidly unfolding crisis under control.

    Rescue operations centered on airlifting stranded visitors from Phantom Ranch, with 45 people evacuated by air on Saturday alone. An additional 37 people were lifted to safety by Sunday afternoon. Search crews will resume their hunt for the final missing person on Tuesday morning, focusing on the stretch of trail between Phantom Ranch and Cottonwood Manzanita. The search is complicated by a new forecast for further heavy rain overnight Monday into Tuesday, which brings an elevated risk of additional flash flooding in the already vulnerable area.

    Nikki Baggs, a 41-year-old hiker who was airlifted from the canyon along with two friends, described the chaotic moments when the flood hit to the BBC. “The whole thing was terrifying,” she said. “It was a beautiful day and then people were screaming, running.”

    Preliminary infrastructure assessments released Monday show nearly all footbridges spanning Bright Angel Creek were destroyed in the flood. The NPS has instituted a full closure of Phantom Ranch, Bright Angel Campground, the entire North Kaibab Trail to Phantom Ranch, Black Bridge, Silver Bridge and the adjacent stretch of the Colorado River. Additionally, roughly 40% of the Transcanyon Waterline, which supplies drinking water to park visitors and approximately 2,500 local residents, has been damaged or destroyed, creating a major ongoing challenge for park operations.

    The Grand Canyon draws roughly 5 million visitors every year, making it one of the most popular national parks in the United States, and the Bright Angel trail is its most frequently hiked route. This flooding is tied to the annual North American monsoon season that brings frequent heavy storms to the Southwestern U.S. This time of year, a shift in wind patterns pulls warm, moisture-heavy air north from the Gulf of California and tropical Pacific, which collides with the region’s mountainous terrain to trigger sudden, intense storms. These monsoon storms are notoriously difficult to predict accurately, meaning they can strike with little to no warning. Compounding the risk, the region’s typically parched ground cannot absorb heavy rainfall quickly, so even strong downpours almost immediately spawn dangerous flash floods, while frequent lightning from the storms also increases the threat of wildfires across the Southwest.

  • Woman killed in Times Square stabbing, suspect shot dead by police

    Woman killed in Times Square stabbing, suspect shot dead by police

    One of the busiest tourist hubs in the United States, New York City’s Times Square, was the site of a shocking random violence incident on a Wednesday afternoon that left two people dead and one injured, city officials have confirmed.

    At a press briefing shortly after the attack, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani confirmed the details of the incident, outlining that a 32-year-old female bystander and the 49-year-old female attacker both died after being transported to a local hospital. The third person involved, a 68-year-old man who was also stabbed, remains in stable condition, Mamdani added.

    NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch expanded on the timeline of the rapidly unfolding attack, which she described as an unprovoked act of random violence. According to preliminary investigation data, the city’s 911 emergency call center began receiving multiple reports of the stabbing at approximately 4:24 p.m. local time. Witness accounts collected by investigators indicate the incident started near the intersection of West 41st Street and Seventh Avenue, when the suspect pulled two knives from a red Target bag before approaching her first victim.

    That first victim, the 68-year-old man, had just exited a nearby subway station and was waiting to cross the street with his wife when he was attacked. The suspect stabbed him in the right abdomen, and he was quickly transported to Bellevue Hospital, where his condition has been updated to stable.

    After the initial assault, the suspect continued moving north along Seventh Avenue toward 42nd Street, where she carried out a second stabbing that claimed the life of the 32-year-old female victim. Responding NYPD officers encountered the suspect moments later and attempted to de-escalate the situation for four minutes, ordering her repeatedly to drop her weapons. According to Tisch, the suspect refused all commands, telling officers “I’m not dropping anything, I’d rather kill both of you” and repeating threats to take their lives.

    When the suspect advanced on officers while brandishing her blades, officers first attempted to stop her with a Taser. However, the less-lethal weapon proved ineffective, and the suspect continued moving toward the responding team. Faced with an immediate threat to their safety and the safety of nearby bystanders, officers opened fire, striking the suspect. She was rushed to Bellevue Hospital alongside the other victims, where she was later pronounced dead.

    Investigators have since identified the attacker as Pamela Cisneros, a 49-year-old Queens resident. Tisch confirmed that Cisneros had no prior criminal arrests, but NYPD records show she had documented interactions with police related to mental health incidents in both 2018 and 2019.

    Witnesses who were in the area during the attack described the chaotic scene that unfolded. Melinda Puzon, a tourist visiting New York from Boston, told reporters she heard the gunshots and immediately saw crowds of people scrambling in response. “It’s very shocking,” Puzon said of the incident in one of the city’s most crowded public spaces.

    In his remarks, Mayor Mamdani extended his gratitude to the first responders who acted quickly to contain the threat, noting that their fast intervention “prevented a horrific attack from becoming even worse.”

  • Liberals sweep three seats in boost for Carney after trade tensions with US

    Liberals sweep three seats in boost for Carney after trade tensions with US

    In a significant show of political force that underscores continued public confidence in Prime Minister Mark Carney’s leadership, Canada’s ruling Liberal Party claimed victory in all three federal parliamentary by-elections held across the country on Monday. The outcome comes more than a year into Carney’s premiership, and on the heels of high-stakes trade friction with the United States that appears to have rallied domestic support behind the government.

    The special elections were called to fill vacancies left by the resignations of three sitting Members of Parliament. The most high-profile upset came in the Quebec riding of Chicoutimi-Le Fjord, where the Liberals flipped the seat from the official opposition Conservative Party. In the other two contests, held in Beaches-East York (Ontario) and North Vancouver-Capilano (British Columbia), the governing party held onto the seats, matching pre-election polling projections.

    Carney’s standing in national opinion polls has risen sharply since he made the decision to end stalled trade negotiations with the U.S., accusing Washington of pushing unfair terms that would harm Canadian economic interests. Taking to social media platform X to celebrate the by-election results, the prime minister congratulated the three winning Liberal candidates and struck a determined tone on the challenges ahead. “Canada is being tested in a changing world, and Canadians are up for it,” Carney wrote.

    The clean sweep preserves Carney’s narrow working majority in the House of Commons, a critical outcome for the government’s legislative agenda going forward.

    Canadian election projections confirmed a commanding victory for the Liberals in Chicoutimi-Le Fjord. The party’s candidate, Daniel Gobeil, a third-generation dairy farmer, won more than 50% of the popular vote to claim the seat, defeating Bloc Québécois (second) and Conservative (third) challengers. This marked a shift from the previous election in the riding, which was a tight three-way contest. Speaking to supporters in French, Gobeil framed the win as a mandate for advancing national unity across all regions of Canada, according to public broadcaster CBC.

    In Ontario, Tanveer Shahnawaz secured the Beaches-East York seat for the Liberals, while Braeden Caley held the North Vancouver-Capilano riding for the party in British Columbia, capping off an undefeated night for the governing bloc.

    The results add to a string of struggles for the Conservative Party, which has failed to narrow its polling gap with the Liberals since losing the 2025 federal election. Current national surveys show the Conservatives trailing Carney’s party by roughly 10 percentage points. Since the April 2025 vote, four Conservative MPs have crossed the floor to join the Liberals, while three more have resigned or announced plans to leave office. The Quebec seat contested on Monday was vacated when former Conservative MP Richard Martel resigned last month after Carney appointed him to the unelected Canadian Senate.

    The loss of Martel’s former seat delivers another major blow to Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who won a landslide leadership confidence vote in January but has faced growing scrutiny over his ability to connect with Canadian voters in the current political climate.

    Meanwhile, new polling data released Monday by Canadian research firm Abacus Data shows Carney’s government approval rating has risen four percentage points in recent weeks, alongside a matching jump in the prime minister’s personal popularity. Abacus Data founder David Coletto attributes the upward trend to two key factors: deeply negative views of U.S. President Donald Trump among Canadian voters, and a national rallying effect around Carney’s decision to walk away from unfavorable trade talks with the White House.

    Coletto noted that the shift in approval is most dramatic in Quebec, where Carney’s personal approval rating is now higher than in any other Canadian province. The province is also set to bear the brunt of new 50% tariffs on a wide range of Canadian goods imposed by Trump, which took effect after trade talks collapsed earlier this month. Global forecasting firm Oxford Economics recently warned that Quebec could lose up to C$2 billion ($1.4 billion) in annual economic output by 2028 if the tariffs remain in place.

  • Teen girl charged with murder over recording of San Diego mosque attack

    Teen girl charged with murder over recording of San Diego mosque attack

    A horrific mass shooting at the Islamic Center of San Diego that left three people dead in May has led to a major legal development, with a 17-year-old girl from North Carolina indicted on multiple murder charges for her role in aiding and abetting the attack. Prosecutors allege the teenager directly facilitated the white supremacist-motivated attack by live-streaming the assault and publishing the attackers’ hateful manifesto after the shooting.

    Forsyth County District Attorney Jim O’Neill announced this week that the teen was arrested last week and formally indicted by a grand jury on Monday. O’Neill told reporters the decision to move forward with immediate arrest and charges was rooted in public safety concerns, noting that authorities could not take risks given the upcoming school week and religious holidays. “The thought of her going back to school, with the weekend approaching, holy days approaching, we didn’t know what she was capable of,” O’Neill said at a press briefing.

    The teen now faces three counts of murder and one count of conspiracy. Under North Carolina state law, any individual charged with aiding and abetting a criminal act faces the same level of criminal liability as the perpetrators who directly carried out the violence, O’Neill explained.

    The May 18 attack was carried out by two teenage males, ages 17 and 18, who opened fire on worshippers and other people at the Southern California mosque before dying by suicide. O’Neill confirmed the pair had two core goals for their attack: first, to kill as many people as possible, and second, to record and live-stream the carnage to spread their ideology and inspire further violence. The attackers mounted recording devices on GoPro-style helmets to capture the entire assault.

    Three people lost their lives in the attack: mosque security guard Amin Abdullah, and worshippers Mansour Kaziha and Nader Awad. Abdullah acted heroically during the attack, exchanging gunfire with the shooters and initiating a building lockdown that protected roughly 140 children who were inside the mosque at the time. San Diego Police Chief Scott Wahl previously praised Abdullah’s quick, brave actions, saying they “undoubtedly” saved dozens of lives. Kaziha and Awad were killed in the parking lot after drawing the shooters’ attention away from people inside the building.

    Investigators have since uncovered disturbing details about the attackers’ broader plans and extremist beliefs. The pair held a cache of roughly 30 firearms and a crossbow, all of which were stolen from one of the shooter’s parents. They also plotted follow-up attacks at three additional targets: a nearby Jewish temple and a majority African American high school. The attackers left behind written materials filled with virulent racist and antisemitic rhetoric rooted in white supremacist ideology, and they explicitly cited the 2019 Christchurch, New Zealand, mosque shooter—who killed 51 people in a live-streamed attack—as an inspiration for their violence.

  • Could Tupac verdict inspire new efforts to also find killer of his rap rival?

    Could Tupac verdict inspire new efforts to also find killer of his rap rival?

    After three decades of unresolved speculation surrounding one of hip-hop’s most shocking tragedies, a Las Vegas court has finally handed down a guilty verdict in the murder trial of iconic rapper Tupac Shakur, closing a chapter that has haunted global music culture for generations. The defendant, Duane “Keffe D” Davis, was convicted of orchestrating the 1996 drive-by shooting that killed the West Coast rap legend, a outcome that drew raw emotional reactions from Shakur’s family inside the courtroom and reignited calls to solve the parallel unsolved killing of East Coast rap star The Notorious B.I.G.

    For legal experts, the conviction marks a historic end to one of America’s highest-profile cold cases. “We’re talking about the greatest rapper of all time, an icon, and not a single arrest or prosecution for 30 years,” former prosecutor Neama Rahmani told the BBC, describing the case as an uphill battle that few believed prosecutors could win. “This is huge. It was a tough case. It’s a cold case. It gives closure to 30 years of mystery, the end of an era.”

    Inside the courtroom, the moment the guilty verdict was read brought immediate tears and embraces from Shakur’s loved ones, with one family member even hugging the lead prosecutor on the case. For his part, Davis has already announced he plans to appeal the ruling, while legal observers and hip-hop fans alike have turned their attention to the long-dead case of Christopher Wallace, better known by his stage names Biggie Smalls and The Notorious B.I.G., Shakur’s iconic East Coast rival who was killed in a nearly identical drive-by shooting in Los Angeles just six months after Shakur’s death.

    What makes the Davis conviction particularly notable is that the entire case rested almost entirely on Davis’ own repeated public admissions of his role in the killing. Over decades, Davis openly discussed his involvement in multiple media documentaries, a published memoir, podcast interviews, and even a secret police interrogation. He claimed that on the night of September 7, 1996, he placed a firearm in the backseat of a vehicle, and his nephew Orlando Anderson fired the fatal shots at Shakur as their car pulled alongside Shakur’s near the Las Vegas Strip. Anderson, who always denied killing Shakur, was shot and killed in a separate gang confrontation in 1998.

    Notably, prosecutors presented no physical evidence to corroborate Davis’ admissions: there were no eyewitnesses who could place Davis in the vehicle during the shooting, no murder weapon was ever recovered, and no video or photographic evidence placed Davis at the scene that night. Davis’ defense team argued aggressively that his repeated confessions were nothing more than fabricated tall tales designed to sell books and boost his public profile, telling the jury that there was no concrete proof of his guilt. Trial attorney Shaun Kent summed up the prosecution’s position ahead of the verdict, noting that “the strongest witness against him – is him.” The case only moved forward because Davis repeatedly chose to discuss his role publicly, with Kent explaining “the case really evolved with each interview and moment that Davis decided to open his mouth and talk about the case more.”

    Rahmani argued that Davis’ repeated willingness to confess on the record makes him one of the most unassuming criminals in recent history. “He would have never have faced charges if he had stayed silent,” Rahmani said. “He really couldn’t stop himself. Even when he was arrested and in custody, he was giving interviews.”

    The trial also pulled the jury back into the context of 1990s hip-hop culture, when a brutal high-profile feud between East Coast and West Coast rap scenes dominated the genre, and deep-seated gang influence and a street code of silence kept witnesses from cooperating with police. Even after being fatally wounded, Shakur refused to name his attackers to responding officers, telling an ambulance crew that he would handle the situation on his own. That same code of silence allowed Biggie’s killing to remain unsolved for 29 years.

    Davis has long been tied to Biggie’s killing as well: he was acquainted with the rapper and was present at the same Los Angeles party the night Biggie was killed, and the investigator who interviewed Davis after Biggie’s death even testified during the Tupac trial. The Los Angeles Police Department has confirmed that Biggie’s murder remains an active, open investigation, and legal experts are hopeful that the Tupac conviction will encourage investigators to re-examine the 29-year-old cold case.

    “It’s really a stain on the LAPD. The fact that this could happen and not a single arrest was made and no one was prosecuted,” Rahmani said of Biggie’s unsolved death, which occurred on a public street in the middle of America’s second most populous city. “Prosecutors don’t like to lose and tend to be a little gun shy, but maybe this [Tupac’s conviction] will embolden folks in Los Angeles to maybe take another look at it, a cold case that’s coming up on 30 years.”

    In a statement to the BBC, LAPD Lieutenant Elpidio Orozco confirmed the department remains committed to solving the case, saying “The murder of Christopher Wallace remains an open, unsolved case within LAPD’s Robbery-Homicide Division,” and urging any member of the public with new information to contact authorities.

    For fans and family of Tupac Shakur, however, the verdict brings a long-awaited end to three decades of uncertainty, closing one of the most infamous chapters in modern music history.