标签: North America

北美洲

  • Costs from Trump’s tariffs paid almost entirely by US consumers, NY Fed says

    Costs from Trump’s tariffs paid almost entirely by US consumers, NY Fed says

    A comprehensive analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York demonstrates that American corporations and consumers are absorbing approximately 90% of the financial burden resulting from elevated tariffs imposed on imported goods. The research, published Thursday, indicates that the average tariff rate surged dramatically from 2.6% to 13% throughout 2025, marking one of the most significant increases in recent trade history.

    The study examined tariff implementations targeting multiple trading partners including China, Mexico, Canada, and the European Union. Contrary to conventional economic expectations, exporting nations maintained stable pricing structures rather than reducing costs to mitigate potential declines in U.S. demand. This pricing strategy resulted in importers transferring additional expenses directly to American consumers through elevated retail prices.

    This pattern mirrors outcomes observed during the 2018 tariff implementations during President Trump’s initial term, suggesting consistent economic behavior across different trade environments. The New York Fed’s findings receive substantial validation from parallel international studies.

    Independent analysis from Germany’s Kiel Institute for the World Economy, based on examination of 25 million transactions, confirmed nearly complete transfer of tariff costs to U.S. import prices. Their research revealed that major exporters including Brazil and India opted to reduce shipment volumes rather than decrease pricing, resulting in what researchers termed ‘trade volume collapse.’

    Supporting evidence from the National Bureau of Economic Research indicated approximately 100% pass-through of tariffs to consumer pricing. Meanwhile, the Tax Foundation, a Washington DC-based policy research organization, characterized the tariffs as effectively constituting a new consumer tax. Their calculations suggest the average American household incurred approximately $1,000 in additional costs during 2025, with projections indicating a rise to $1,300 for 2026.

    The Tax Foundation further noted that the effective tariff rate—accounting for reduced purchasing in response to higher prices—currently stands at 9.9%, representing the highest average rate recorded since 1946. According to their analysis, these increased costs will completely offset any potential economic benefits derived from tax reductions included in the administration’s legislative proposals.

  • DHS shutdown looms as funding bill fails over immigration demands

    DHS shutdown looms as funding bill fails over immigration demands

    A critical funding bill for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been blocked in the Senate following a contentious partisan dispute over proposed reforms to immigration enforcement protocols. Thursday’s procedural vote failed to secure the necessary majority, stalling legislation just before Saturday’s midnight funding deadline.

    The deadlock centers on Democratic demands for substantial operational changes at Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). These reforms, prompted by recent fatal incidents involving ICE operations, include prohibiting agents from wearing masks during interactions, mandating body camera usage, and implementing stricter oversight mechanisms.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer characterized these proposals as “common sense” measures already standard among local law enforcement nationwide. “Democrats will not support a blank cheque for chaos,” Schumer declared following the vote, emphasizing requirements for judicial warrants before entering private properties and bans on enforcement at sensitive locations including schools, medical facilities, and places of worship.

    Despite the funding lapse, ICE operations will continue largely unaffected due to previous legislation allocating billions to advance President Trump’s immigration agenda. However, other critical DHS agencies face immediate impacts. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem warned that agencies including FEMA (disaster response) and TSA (airport security) would experience operational disruptions, with personnel potentially facing unpaid furloughs.

    Republican opposition focuses on maintaining enforcement capabilities, with Senate Majority Leader John Thune dismissing certain Democratic proposals as “non-starters that unnecessarily tie the hands of law enforcement.” The GOP’s central demand remains mandatory cooperation between local police and federal immigration authorities.

    With the Senate currently in recess, legislators await a potential compromise that could trigger a recall vote. The already House-approved bill remains in legislative limbo as both parties navigate complex negotiations surrounding immigration policy and security funding.

  • The US economy is growing – so where are all the jobs?

    The US economy is growing – so where are all the jobs?

    The American labor market is presenting a paradoxical scenario that defies conventional economic wisdom. While macroeconomic indicators show robust growth with the economy expanding at a 4.4% annual pace, job seekers like Jacob Trigg face unprecedented challenges. The 42-year-old Texan project manager, previously accustomed to quick employment transitions, has submitted over 2,000 applications without securing permanent professional work, instead relying on package delivery and landscaping jobs to survive.

    This personal struggle reflects a broader national phenomenon where job openings and hiring rates have plummeted to multi-year lows. Recent data reveals the US added merely 15,000 jobs monthly last year—a strikingly low figure by historical standards. Yet simultaneously, the unemployment rate remains stable at 4.3%, layoffs stay limited outside notable exceptions like Amazon and UPS, and economic expansion continues.

    Economists describe this combination as highly unusual. Jed Kolko of the Peterson Institute for International Economics notes: ‘It’s actually very hard to point to another moment in the last 25 years where you have the combination we see today.’

    The situation has sparked intense debate about potential structural shifts in the economy. Goldman Sachs’ widely cited October report suggested the US might be entering a period of ‘jobless growth,’ driven particularly by artificial intelligence adoption enabling companies to achieve more with reduced human resources. This concern resonated through World Economic Forum discussions in Davos, contributing to widespread economic anxiety.

    Professor Constantin Burgi of University College Dublin observes that such decoupling of job gains from overall growth typically occurs during fundamental economic transformations. While he views the situation as potentially temporary, he acknowledges it could persist for years if jobs are permanently lost to AI or outsourcing.

    The human impact is profound. James Richardson, a 33-year-old information security analyst from Pittsburgh, has applied to over 1,200 positions since October, sometimes receiving rejections within 15 minutes. ‘It feels like there is no-one on the other side even bothering to look at your experiences,’ he lamented, noting he would be homeless without parental support.

    Multiple factors beyond technology may contribute to the hiring slowdown. Many companies, especially in tech, still carry surplus workers hired during pandemic-era booms. The Trump administration’s immigration crackdown simultaneously reduces both available workers and demand for them. Economic uncertainty from government spending cuts and tariff programs may also suppress hiring appetite.

    Despite stronger-than-expected January job gains offering some hope, economists like Indeed’s research director Laura Ullrich caution against declaring a ‘new normal.’ She maintains current conditions are unsustainable long-term, as low hiring, low firing, and low quit rates during economic growth cannot persist indefinitely.

    For job seekers like Amy Beson, laid off from the University of Arizona amid government funding cuts, the situation feels desperately permanent. Even expanding her search to healthcare—typically a resilient sector—has yielded nothing, leading her to worry this challenging environment represents a permanent shift rather than a temporary anomaly.

  • Troop who fell overboard becomes first American killed in drug boat targeting operation

    Troop who fell overboard becomes first American killed in drug boat targeting operation

    The United States Marine Corps has confirmed the first fatality in President Trump’s intensified counter-narcotics operations in Caribbean waters. Lance Corporal Chukwuemeka E. Oforah, a 21-year-old Florida native, was lost at sea on February 7th after falling overboard from the USS Iwo Jima during Operation Southern Spear. Despite an extensive search effort involving five naval vessels and ten aircraft, the Marine was pronounced dead on February 10th after three days of intensive searching.

    The incident represents the first known American military death in the administration’s expanded campaign against drug trafficking networks. Operation Southern Spear has conducted 38 lethal strikes against suspected narcotics vessels since its inception in September, playing a pivotal role in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro, whom the Trump administration accuses of collaborating with drug trafficking organizations.

    Colonel Tom Trimble, commanding officer of the Marine Expeditionary Unit, expressed profound grief, stating, “We are all grieving alongside the Oforah family. The loss of Lance Cpl. Oforah is deeply felt across the entire Navy-Marine Corps team. He will be profoundly missed, and his dedicated service will not be forgotten.”

    The circumstances surrounding Oforah’s fall remain under military investigation, with officials providing no specific details about how the tragedy occurred. The USS Iwo Jima, which recently transported the captured Venezuelan leader, has been at the forefront of the administration’s hemispheric narcotics interdiction efforts.

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has characterized Operation Southern Spear as essential to removing “narco-terrorists from our hemisphere” and protecting Americans from deadly drugs. However, the campaign faces mounting legal challenges, including a lawsuit filed by families of two Trinidadian men killed in an October strike, alleging “lawless killings in cold blood.” Legal experts have raised concerns about potential violations of international law, particularly regarding due process for suspects targeted in maritime operations.

  • Analysis: Trump takes victory lap after biggest climate rollback yet

    Analysis: Trump takes victory lap after biggest climate rollback yet

    In a landmark environmental policy reversal, the Trump administration has formally rescinded the 2009 “endangerment finding” that served as the legal foundation for federal climate regulations. The announcement, made at the White House on Thursday, represents one of the most significant environmental policy shifts of Trump’s second term.

    President Trump framed the decision as a political victory over what he termed the Democratic Party’s “radical environmental agenda,” characterizing the move as liberation from bureaucratic overreach. The original 2009 finding, established during the Obama administration, provided scientific justification for regulating greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act, enabling policies targeting emissions from vehicles, power plants, and industrial sources.

    EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, appearing alongside the president, described the endangerment finding as the “holy grail of climate change religion” and hailed its revocation as “the single largest act of deregulation in the history of the United States.” Both officials emphasized economic benefits, arguing that eliminating these regulations would reduce energy costs for consumers and remove burdens on the automotive and fossil fuel industries.

    The policy reversal sparked immediate condemnation from environmental groups and Democratic leaders. Former President Barack Obama declared on social media that the decision would leave Americans “less safe, less healthy and less able to fight climate change” while benefiting fossil fuel interests. The move continues Trump’s pattern of climate policy reversals, having previously withdrawn the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord during his first term and again reversing Biden’s reinstatement at the start of his second term.

    The political implications of this decision remain uncertain as the November midterm elections approach. While Trump and Republicans have positioned climate deregulation as economically beneficial, polling indicates growing public concern about climate change, with a 2024 Yale study showing 63% of Americans worried about global warming and a 2025 Gallup poll finding a record 48% believing it will pose a serious threat in their lifetime.

  • US House, again defiant, votes to end Trump tariffs on Canada

    US House, again defiant, votes to end Trump tariffs on Canada

    In a significant bipartisan rebuke of former President Donald Trump’s trade policies, the House of Representatives voted 219-211 to terminate the national emergency declaration at the northern border that had authorized tariffs on Canadian goods. The resolution revokes Trump’s February 1, 2025 executive order that imposed these tariffs under an unprecedented application of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

    Six Republican representatives—Don Bacon (Nebraska), Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania), Jeff Hurd (Colorado), Kevin Kiley (California), Thomas Massie (Kentucky), and Dan Newhouse (Washington)—crossed party lines to support the Democratic-led measure. Only one Democrat, Jared Golden of Maine, voted against the resolution, while two Republicans abstained from voting.

    The vote occurred amid ongoing legal scrutiny at the Supreme Court regarding whether presidents possess the authority to impose tariffs under the 1970s-era emergency powers law. The Court heard arguments in November but has yet to issue a ruling.

    The debate revealed sharp divisions over the justification for the tariffs. Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the resolution’s lead sponsor, criticized what he called a “manufactured emergency,” emphasizing that “Canada isn’t a threat. Canada is our friend. Canada is our ally.” Meeks cited analyses indicating tariffs cost American households between $1,300 and $1,750 annually.

    Counterarguments focused on fentanyl trafficking, with Representative Brian Mast (R-FL) asserting that the emergency declaration addressed the opioid crisis. However, Customs and Border Protection data shows fentanyl seizures at the northern border remain substantially lower than those at the southwest border.

    This congressional action follows previous bipartisan efforts to check Trump’s tariff authority, including a Senate vote in October that overturned tariffs on Brazilian goods. The development signals growing legislative resistance to executive trade actions that critics argue overstep presidential authority and harm American consumers.

  • Quadria Capital steps up focus on GCC healthcare investments

    Quadria Capital steps up focus on GCC healthcare investments

    Asia’s premier healthcare-focused private equity firm Quadria Capital is intensifying its strategic focus on the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) healthcare market, positioning itself to capitalize on the region’s substantial growth potential. With assets under management exceeding $4.2 billion, the firm is establishing enhanced regional presence to develop scaled healthcare platforms across GCC nations.

    The GCC healthcare sector, valued at approximately $120 billion, demonstrates robust annual growth between 5-13%, significantly outpacing regional GDP expansion. This growth trajectory is fueled by multiple structural factors including rising chronic disease prevalence, aging demographics, mandatory insurance implementation, and predictable healthcare utilization patterns. Despite these favorable demand drivers, the region faces substantial supply constraints with hospital bed density languishing at approximately 50% of OECD standards, persistent workforce shortages, fragmented provider networks, and significant outbound medical tourism indicating gaps in specialized care capacity and quality.

    According to Abrar Mir, Co-Founder and Managing Partner at Quadria, “The GCC stands at a healthcare inflection point. Demand characteristics show large, paying, and long-term requirements while supply remains constrained across both infrastructure and clinical capacity dimensions. Policy support demonstrates both depth and durability.”

    The firm’s leadership emphasizes the region’s readiness for modern healthcare delivery models. Amit Varma, Co-Founder and Managing Partner, notes that “near-universal digital penetration combined with supportive regulatory frameworks positions technology as a core enabler for accelerated scaling, enhanced operational efficiency, and improved patient outcomes.”

    Sunil Thakur, Partner leading GCC initiatives, highlighted Quadria’s hands-on approach: “We maintain close collaboration with management teams focusing on value creation, strategic partnerships, and implementation of digital and AI-driven healthcare models. Our physical presence enables more intensive engagement.”

    Quadria’s expansion strategy leverages existing portfolio companies operating within or entering Middle Eastern markets, providing support through partnership development, market entry assistance, and talent acquisition. The firm will additionally utilize HealthQuad—India’s largest healthtech-focused venture growth fund—to facilitate digital healthcare expansion throughout the GCC region as governments increasingly transition toward regulatory and ecosystem-building roles.

  • US antitrust chief resigns amid tensions with Trump officials

    US antitrust chief resigns amid tensions with Trump officials

    In a significant development for US competition policy, Gail Slater, the head of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, announced her resignation on Thursday via social media. The departure marks the latest in a series of leadership changes within the division since last summer, including the removal of two other senior officials.

    Slater, appointed by President Donald Trump last year and confirmed with bipartisan support, wrote that she was leaving her role ‘with great sadness and abiding hope.’ The Justice Department confirmed her departure but provided no details regarding the circumstances.

    The resignation has sparked concern among antitrust practitioners, lawmakers, and former officials who interpret it as evidence of the White House retreating from robust monopoly enforcement. Critics allege that senior Trump administration officials have repeatedly overruled antitrust division leaders on enforcement decisions, suggesting a softer approach to corporate mergers under lobbyist influence.

    These tensions became publicly visible last summer when the DOJ unexpectedly dropped a lawsuit challenging Hewlett-Packard Enterprise’s $14 billion acquisition of Juniper Networks after companies appealed to top officials. Following this decision, Roger Alford, Slater’s top deputy and veteran of the first Trump administration, was ousted. Alford has since described an internal ‘battle within the Department of Justice’ between antitrust enforcers and senior leadership.

    The ongoing turbulence raises serious questions about the fate of major ongoing cases against companies including Live Nation, Visa, and Apple. According to John Newman, a former FTC official during the Biden administration, this regulatory uncertainty creates a ‘worst case scenario’ for honest businesses while potentially benefiting those indifferent to legal compliance.

    Senator Elizabeth Warren characterized Slater’s departure as appearing ‘like corruption’ and called for congressional investigation into the Trump administration’s actions. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment, while a DOJ spokesperson declined to address allegations of intervention by higher-ups.

  • What is the SAVE America Act that mandates voter ID?

    What is the SAVE America Act that mandates voter ID?

    The U.S. House of Representatives has approved the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act in a narrow 218-213 vote, introducing stringent citizenship verification requirements for voter registration as midterm elections approach. The legislation mandates that individuals present valid U.S. passports or birth certificates to establish citizenship when registering to vote, alongside requiring valid photo identification at polling stations.

    This legislative move has ignited intense partisan debate. Republican proponents, including former President Donald Trump who has consistently endorsed the measure, argue that such provisions are essential to prevent voter fraud and strengthen electoral integrity. “American citizens, and only American citizens, should decide American elections,” stated a White House social media post echoing this position.

    Conversely, Democratic opponents have characterized the bill as a form of voter suppression, expressing concerns that it could disenfranchise millions of eligible voters. Particular attention has been drawn to challenges facing married individuals who have changed their names and may lack matching documentation, with an estimated 21 million Americans reportedly lacking readily available citizenship proof.

    The bill faces significant obstacles in the Senate, where Majority Leader John Thune acknowledges insufficient support to reach the 60-vote threshold required for passage. Thune has explicitly dismissed suggestions to alter filibuster rules to facilitate the bill’s advancement. Further complicating its prospects, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski has declared her opposition to the measure, diminishing its chances of successful passage through the upper chamber.

    The legislative proposal represents a renewed version of previously stalled efforts, establishing specific procedures for individuals with name changes to submit additional identity verification documents while imposing potential criminal penalties on election officials who register voters without obtaining required citizenship proof.

  • FTC warns Apple over alleged lack of conservative news

    FTC warns Apple over alleged lack of conservative news

    Apple Inc. finds itself at the center of a political storm as federal regulators question whether the tech giant’s news aggregation platform systematically disadvantages conservative media outlets. Federal Trade Commission Chair Andrew Ferguson has formally requested that Apple conduct a comprehensive review of its editorial policies following allegations of ideological bias in content curation.

    The regulatory inquiry stems from a Media Research Center report claiming Apple News excluded right-leaning publications from its prominently featured ‘Top Stories’ section throughout January. These allegations have gained traction within conservative circles, receiving endorsement from former President Donald Trump himself.

    In his official correspondence, Ferguson emphasized that while the FTC lacks authority to regulate speech directly, it maintains jurisdiction over consumer protection matters. He cautioned that companies promoting or suppressing content based on ideological considerations might violate regulations against material misrepresentations.

    Apple News, which boasts partnerships with over 3,000 publications and dominates the news app market in multiple English-speaking countries, utilizes algorithmic curation responsive to user interactions and preferences. The company maintains its selection criteria prioritize journalistic quality, excluding content that fails to meet widely accepted standards or contains factual inaccuracies.

    This development occurs against a broader backdrop of heightened scrutiny regarding tech platforms’ content moderation practices. While companies like X (formerly Twitter), Google, and Meta have faced accusations across the political spectrum, Apple had largely avoided similar controversies until now.

    Notably, Apple CEO Tim Cook has cultivated relationships with the Trump administration, contributing financially to the former president’s causes and presenting him with valuable gifts. Cook’s diplomatic efforts have previously helped navigate challenges including tariff disputes, making the current allegations particularly noteworthy given this established rapport.

    The FTC chair acknowledged the commission’s limited authority to mandate platform changes but emphasized the importance of transparency in how Apple represents its curation processes to consumers.