标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Israel intercepts Gaza flotilla near Crete and detains 175 activists

    Israel intercepts Gaza flotilla near Crete and detains 175 activists

    A months-long standoff over Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza has escalated into a new international dispute, after Israeli security forces intercepted at least 22 vessels from the pro-Palestinian Global Sumud Flotilla (GSF) carrying humanitarian intent to the blockaded enclave in international waters off Greece’s Crete. Organizers of the aid mission have decried the operation as outright piracy, while Israeli officials frame the action as a legitimate response to what they call a provocative publicity stunt.

    The 58-vessel flotilla launched two weeks prior from ports across Spain, France, and Italy, with the explicit goal of breaking the years-long Israeli naval blockade that has restricted movement and goods access in and out of Gaza since the outbreak of the current conflict. GSF organizers confirmed that the interceptions took place roughly 965 kilometers (600 miles) from Gaza’s shores, far outside of Israel’s recognized territorial boundaries. In a formal statement released Thursday at 04:30 GMT, the group accused Israeli naval commandos of storming the intercepted vessels in open violation of international maritime law.

    An earlier GSF statement detailed aggressive tactics during the operation: Israeli forces jammed all onboard communications, including dedicated emergency distress channels, before forcibly detaining all civilians on the seized ships. “This is piracy. This is the unlawful seizure of human beings on the open sea near Crete, an assertion that Israel can operate with total impunity, far beyond its own borders, with no consequences,” the GSF said in its official remarks. As of the latest update, GSF tracking data shows the 36 remaining flotilla vessels are holding position off Crete’s southwestern coast, having avoided interception so far.

    Israeli officials have pushed back against the organizers’ claims, asserting that all actions taken comply with international law. The Israeli foreign ministry confirmed that roughly 175 activists from more than 20 intercepted boats have been taken into custody and are being transported to Israeli territory. The ministry dismissed the entire flotilla mission as nothing more than a calculated provocation, claiming no actual humanitarian aid was being carried aboard the vessels. In a pre-interception statement Wednesday, Israeli officials went further, alleging that the militant group Hamas is the driving force behind the flotilla, working in tandem with professional protest provocateurs. The goal of the action, the ministry claimed, is to sabotage the second phase of U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed Gaza peace plan and shift public attention away from Hamas’s ongoing refusal to disarm.

    Israeli media reports add that naval forces issued multiple warnings for the flotilla vessels to change course and retreat before moving in to seize the ships that refused to comply. The Israeli foreign ministry also released its own video footage of the aftermath, which it says shows detained activists moving peacefully onto Israeli naval vessels for transport. This is not the first time Israel has intercepted a GSF mission bound for Gaza: in October of last year, the Israeli military stopped an earlier flotilla before it could reach the enclave, arresting and later deporting more than 470 onboard activists, including high-profile Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg.

    The interception has already sparked new debate over the legality of Israeli military operations far beyond its own territorial waters, as well as renewed international scrutiny of the years-long blockade of Gaza that has severely limited the entry of food, medicine, and other essential supplies into the enclave.

  • UK vows to tackle antisemitism ‘emergency’ as police probe double stabbing attack

    UK vows to tackle antisemitism ‘emergency’ as police probe double stabbing attack

    LONDON – In the wake of a fatal terror stabbing last year and a double stabbing that left two Jewish men seriously injured this week, the British government formally declared antisemitism a national emergency on Thursday, committing £25 million ($34 million) to boost security at Jewish community sites across the country.

    The latest violent incident unfolded Wednesday in Golders Green, a northwest London neighborhood widely recognized as one of the hubs of British Jewish life, home to dozens of synagogues, Jewish schools, and kosher businesses alongside diverse Asian and Middle Eastern communities. Two men, aged 34 and 76, were stabbed in the attack; both remain in stable condition as of Thursday.

    Counterterrorism police took a 45-year-old suspect into custody on suspicion of attempted murder, and have officially classified the stabbing as a terrorist act. Law enforcement officials confirmed the suspect, who has not been publicly identified, has a documented history of severe violence and mental health conditions. Detectives executed a search warrant at a property in southeast London Thursday, following reports the suspect was involved in a local altercation in the area hours before the Golders Green attack. Investigators are still working to confirm a definitive motive, and are assessing unverified claims of responsibility and potential links to Iranian-backed proxies.

    The stabbing is also being examined for possible connections to a recent string of arson attacks targeting synagogues and other Jewish sites across London, which began after the outbreak of the Iran war on February 28. No injuries have been reported in the arson incidents, and multiple suspects ranging from teenagers to people in their 40s have been arrested and charged in connection with the attacks. A little-known group calling itself Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamia (Islamic Movement of the Companions of the Right) has claimed responsibility for the arsons online, and also claimed the Golders Green stabbing. Israeli officials describe the group as a newly formed militant organization with ties to an Iranian proxy, which has also carried out synagogue attacks in Belgium and the Netherlands. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood noted Thursday that authorities are still working to determine whether the group’s claim is legitimate or an opportunistic false claim of responsibility.

    For the British Jewish community, which numbers roughly 300,000 people – less than 0.5% of the UK’s total population – this recent violence marks the latest escalation in a surge of antisemitic activity that began nearly two years ago. Data from the Community Security Trust (CST), a charity that monitors antisemitism and protects Jewish communities, shows reported antisemitic incidents jumped from 1,662 in 2022 to 3,700 in 2025, a surge that followed the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on southern Israel and the subsequent Gaza war. The violence reached a deadly peak in October 2025, when an attacker drove a vehicle into a crowd gathered outside a Manchester synagogue on Yom Kippur, fatally stabbing one person; a second person died during the response after being inadvertently shot by police.

    The sharp rise in antisemitic hostility has ignited fierce political debate over the role of widespread pro-Palestinian protests held across the UK since the Gaza war began. While the vast majority of these demonstrations have remained peaceful, many Jewish community members and political leaders argue that some rhetoric and chants used at the protests – most notably the slogan “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” – cross the line from criticism of Israeli policy to open incitement of antisemitic hatred. A small number of protesters have been arrested for openly expressing support for Hamas, which is classified as a banned terrorist organization in the UK.

    Jonathan Hall, the UK’s former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, has publicly called for a temporary ban on large pro-Palestinian marches, arguing that the demonstrations have created an environment that “incubates” antisemitic violence. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the opposition Conservative Party, has backed the call for a ban, claiming the protests are routinely used as cover for violence and intimidation targeting Jewish communities.

    Speaking Thursday, Mahmood emphasized that the government is treating the current antisemitism crisis as a top national security priority. “I am treating antisemitism as an emergency – it is the top pressing issue in relation to security that I face,” she said. The new £25 million security funding will be used to expand visible police patrols and upgrade physical protection at synagogues, Jewish schools, and Jewish community centers across the UK. In addition to the new security investment, the government announced Thursday it will introduce new legislation to allow prosecution of individuals and groups that operate on behalf of state-sponsored terrorist organizations, a move widely seen as targeted at Iranian-linked groups operating in the UK.

  • Wood’s penalty gives Nottingham Forest a 1-0 win over Aston Villa in Europa League semifinal 1st leg

    Wood’s penalty gives Nottingham Forest a 1-0 win over Aston Villa in Europa League semifinal 1st leg

    In an all-English UEFA Europa League semifinal first leg clash on Thursday, a 71st-minute penalty from striker Chris Wood earned Nottingham Forest a narrow 1-0 win over Aston Villa at the City Ground, putting the historic English club one step closer to ending a 46-year wait for a continental competition final.

    The encounter pitted two sides with storied past European success against each other, both eager to recapture the glory that defined their legacy decades ago. Wood’s decisive spot kick left Aston Villa goalkeeper Emiliano Martínez with no chance to make a save, after referee ruled defender Lucas Digne handled the ball inside the box. Speaking to broadcaster TNT Sports after the full-time whistle, the New Zealand international struck a balanced tone about Forest’s position heading into the return leg. “It’s nice to have the advantage but going to Villa Park will be a tough game,” Wood said. “But we’ve done the job here at home and now hopefully we’ll build into next week.”

    The result stretches Forest’s current unbeaten run across all competitions to nine matches, an impressive run of form for a side balancing multiple high-stakes battles this season. Nuno Espírito Santo’s side (corrected from the original text’s attribution to Vítor Pereira, who does not manage Nottingham Forest) currently sit five points above the Premier League relegation zone, locked in a tense fight to avoid dropping to the English second division even as they chase European silverware. A unique quirk of UEFA’s competition rules creates a rare possible scenario: if Forest win the Europa League title but are relegated from the Premier League, they would still earn a spot in next season’s UEFA Champions League, the continent’s top club competition.

    For Forest, this run to the Europa League semifinal marks a full-circle moment for the club. It is their first appearance in a continental semifinal since 1984’s UEFA Cup, and their return to European competition after a 30-year absence, capping a remarkable rise after years spent outside the top flight. The club cemented its place in European history in the late 1970s and early 1980s, when it shocked the continent to win back-to-back European Cups – the predecessor to today’s Champions League – in 1979 and 1980. Aston Villa, the opposition, has its own European title pedigree: the club claimed the European Cup crown just two years after Forest’s second win, in 1982.

    Aston Villa, currently fifth in the Premier League, remains on track to qualify for next season’s Champions League through domestic league standing. Managed by Unai Emery – the most successful manager in Europa League history with four titles to his name (three with Sevilla and one with Villarreal), Villa will enter the return leg at their home ground Villa Park next Thursday with plenty of time to turn the tie around. Before that second leg, Forest faces a critical Premier League away test against Chelsea on Monday, as they continue to juggle domestic survival and European ambition.

    In the other Europa League semifinal played Thursday, Portuguese side Braga secured a dramatic 2-1 home win over Germany’s Freiburg, with substitute Mario Dorgeles scoring the winning goal deep into second-half stoppage time. The match held its own late drama: before Dorgeles’ winner, Freiburg goalkeeper Noah Atubolu kept the scores level with a diving save to his right to deny Rodrigo Zalazar’s penalty. Braga is targeting its first European final appearance since falling 1-0 to domestic rival Porto in the 2011 Europa League title match. The second leg of that tie will also be held next Thursday, with the Europa League final scheduled for May 20 in Istanbul, Turkey.

    Across in the UEFA Conference League, the third-tier European club competition, three more first leg semifinal matches kicked off Thursday. Ismaïla Sarr gave Crystal Palace a dream start just 60 seconds into their tie against Ukraine’s Shakhtar Donetsk, scoring the opening goal on the way to a 3-1 first leg win for the English side. Daichi Kamada and Jorgen Strand Larsen added further goals for Palace after Oleh Ocheretko had drawn Shakhtar level early on. Due to the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, the match was hosted at a neutral venue in Krakow, Poland, with the return leg set for next Thursday at Palace’s home Selhurst Park in London.

    In the day’s other Conference League semifinal, Spain’s Rayo Vallecano claimed a 1-0 home win over France’s Strasbourg to take their first leg advantage. The Conference League final is scheduled for May 27 in Leipzig, Germany.

  • Activists say Israel has intercepted their Gaza aid flotilla near Crete, detaining crews

    Activists say Israel has intercepted their Gaza aid flotilla near Crete, detaining crews

    In an operation that has reignited global debate over Israel’s 18-year blockade of the Gaza Strip, Israeli security forces intercepted dozens of activist vessels from the Global Sumud Flotilla, a humanitarian mission aiming to deliver aid to the blockaded Palestinian enclave, overnight between Wednesday and Thursday. The interception took place roughly 1,000 kilometers (over 600 miles) from Gaza, in international waters near the southern Greek island of Crete, with all crew members on the stopped vessels detained.

    The Global Sumud Flotilla first launched earlier this month from Barcelona, Spain. Organizers originally announced that more than 70 vessels and 1,000 participants from dozens of countries would join the mission, with additional ships joining the convoy as it traveled east across the Mediterranean Sea. By mid-morning Thursday, ship tracking data published on the activist group’s website confirmed that 22 vessels had been intercepted, while 36 other craft remained en route. Israel’s Foreign Ministry announced in a post on the social platform X that it would transfer the roughly 175 detained activists from more than 20 intercepted boats to Israeli territory.

    This interception comes less than 12 months after Israeli authorities foiled a previous attempt by the same activist coalition to reach Gaza. In an official statement responding to the operation, the group called Israel’s action a dangerous and unprecedented escalation, labeling the detainment of civilian activists hundreds of kilometers off Gaza’s coast as an abduction carried out in full view of the international community.

    The background to this confrontation stretches back to 2007, when Israel and Egypt imposed a graduated blockade on Gaza after Hamas seized control of the territory from rival Palestinian factions. Israeli officials justify the blockade as a critical security measure to prevent Hamas from smuggling weapons into the enclave, but human rights critics argue that the restriction amounts to collective punishment of Gaza’s 2 million civilian residents.

    International pushback against the interception was swift. Turkey’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the seizure of the flotilla as an act of piracy in an official statement Thursday, noting that Israel had violated core humanitarian principles and international law by targeting a mission focused on drawing global attention to the humanitarian catastrophe facing Gaza’s civilian population. The ministry added that Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan had held a phone call about the raid with his Spanish counterpart, Jose Manuel Albares Bueno, to coordinate diplomatic responses.

    Local activists in Greece have also called out Athens for its lack of response to the interception, noting that the operation unfolded within the maritime search and rescue responsibility zone assigned to Greece, yet the Greek coast guard took no action. Demonstrators planned a protest rally for Thursday afternoon outside the Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs in central Athens to voice their anger.

    The interception comes amid a fragile six-month ceasefire that has paused the most intense phase of the Israel-Hamas war that began in October 2023. The conflict erupted when Hamas-led militants launched a cross-border incursion into southern Israel that killed roughly 1,200 people, most of them civilians. Retaliatory Israeli military operations in Gaza have killed more than 72,300 Palestinians since the war began, according to Gaza’s Hamas-run Health Ministry, whose casualty tracking is widely regarded as reliable by United Nations agencies and independent analysts. Even with the ceasefire in place, the ministry reports that more than 790 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli attacks across the enclave.

    Even after months of paused active fighting, most of Gaza remains in ruins, with 2 million residents facing acute shortages of food, clean water, and essential medicine. Only a limited volume of humanitarian aid is allowed to enter Gaza through a single border crossing controlled by Israeli authorities. Flotilla organizers emphasized that their mission aims to refocus global public attention on the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza, particularly as international media and diplomatic focus has recently shifted to escalating tensions between Israel and Iran.

    The 2024 interception mirrors a similar confrontation last year, when the Global Sumud Flotilla attempted to breach the blockade. Last year’s mission included high-profile participants such as Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, and all participating vessels were ultimately intercepted, seized, or turned away even after one craft crossed the 12-nautical-mile boundary marking Gaza’s territorial waters. After the 2023 operation, detained activists claimed that Israeli authorities physically abused them during detention, claims that Israeli officials have repeatedly denied. All participants were eventually arrested, detained, and deported after last year’s attempt.

  • Royal recruits boost volunteers as the Netherlands builds up its military reservists

    Royal recruits boost volunteers as the Netherlands builds up its military reservists

    Deep in a forested training ground in eastern Netherlands, a company of Dutch reserve infantrymen slip silently between tree trunks, their faces streaked with camouflage paint and Colt C7 rifles held ready. Sweeping their surroundings for simulated hostile threats, the weekend exercise is far more than routine training: it is part of a sweeping national push to expand the Netherlands’ armed forces, one that mirrors a continent-wide military build-up reshaping European defense policy amid growing geopolitical tension.

    The Dutch government and military leadership have set an ambitious target to grow active and reserve personnel from 80,000 today to 120,000 by 2035, a plan that has earned cross-party political backing across the political spectrum. The expansion of reserve forces is a core pillar of this strategy, and the initiative has gotten an unexpected boost from the country’s royal household: Queen Máxima and her eldest daughter, Princess Amalia, the heir to the Dutch throne, have enlisted as volunteer reservists. Images of Máxima training at a shooting range have circulated globally, creating what Dutch defense officials have dubbed the “Amalia effect,” a surge in public interest that has left recruiters grappling with a welcome but unprecedented challenge.

    Dutch Defense State Secretary Derk Boswijk confirmed the phenomenon in an interview with the Associated Press. “It’s really a thing, yes. It’s very inspiring to see how members of our royal family inspired people to join our armed forces,” he said. Currently, the Netherlands counts roughly 9,000 active reservists, with a target of at least 20,000 by 2030. Today, “We have more applications than we can handle,” Boswijk noted, adding that the military is now working overtime to address bottlenecks: limited training capacity, insufficient housing for new recruits, and backlogs in issuing essential gear from uniforms to firearms. Even so, Boswijk calls it a “luxury problem” for a force that long struggled with low public engagement.

    The Dutch recruitment push is not an isolated effort. Across Europe, nations are expanding and modernizing their militaries in response to two defining shifts in global security: the ongoing grinding war in Ukraine launched by Russia, and growing uncertainty over the long-term commitment of the United States to the NATO alliance, the foundation of European collective defense since the end of World War II. European Union and NATO officials have warned that Russian President Vladimir Putin could be prepared to launch an attack on another European nation within three to five years if he secures victory in Ukraine, prompting NATO to update its defense plans to require allies to prepare for large-scale conventional conflict, with a focus on agile, rapidly deployable forces.

    Many European nations are adjusting their recruitment models to meet new force requirements. Germany is considering a proposal to improve pay, training, and service flexibility for short-term recruits, avoiding a full revival of conscription suspended in 2011 but leaving the door open to limited compulsory service if voluntary enlistment falls short. France, like the Netherlands, is leaning into voluntary expansion: a new program launching in September will recruit 3,000 18 to 25-year-olds for 10-month uniformed service across metropolitan and overseas France, with a target of 50,000 new volunteers annually by 2035.

    In northern and eastern Europe, where the threat of Russian aggression is felt most acutely, many nations have retained or reintroduced conscription. Finland requires all male citizens to complete military service while allowing voluntary service for women. Sweden reinstated gender-neutral partial military service in 2017, holding a lottery to fill remaining slots if voluntary enlistment is insufficient. Denmark uses a similar system, and Latvia revived its draft in 2023 in direct response to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    The Netherlands has never formally abolished conscription, but call-ups have been suspended since 1997, and the government has no plans to revive the policy. Instead, defense officials are working to make military service attractive to a far broader cross-section of Dutch society, recognizing that modern threats extend far beyond traditional battlefields into cyberspace and digital infrastructure. “We need all kind of skills, to keep our society, our country, our allies safe,” Boswijk said. “So, yes, we need also people wearing hoodies, having blue hair, who can game perfectly.”

    For many new Dutch recruits, shifting global insecurity and lessons from national history are key motivations. Lisette den Heijer, a prospective reservist, recalled the lessons she learned in primary school about the 1940 Nazi invasion of the Netherlands, which saw the country conquered in just five days. “I don’t want history to repeat itself,” she said at a recent information session for new volunteers. A private first class in the 10th Infantry Battalion, who spoke anonymously due to his civilian work in the defense sector, noted a clear shift in training priorities over the last half-decade. “So where we were just focused on peaceful operations in 2018, we’re now more focusing on protecting vital infrastructure,” he said, pointing to his recent deployment as part of the massive security operation for the 2024 NATO summit in The Hague.

    A female corporal in the reserve battalion, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, echoed that observation. “When I first joined, there was almost no risk or almost no threat … and now it’s changing so we are more aware of it,” she said. That shift has pushed a change in mindset toward “more what we call ‘green things,’ infantry things,” she added, “We are here to defend our country and to make sure to keep the threat down.”

    Under current Dutch rules, reserve personnel commit just 300 hours of service annually, mostly through regular weekend training exercises. Traditionally, reservists are tasked with securing domestic critical infrastructure, supporting national emergency responses such as flood control sandbag operations, and are not deployed to overseas combat missions. On the recent weekend exercise in the eastern Netherlands, the reserve unit’s mission wrapped up successfully after the team rooted out a hidden simulated enemy combatant from a camouflaged foxhole. Exchanging high-fives after the exercise, the reservists broke down their camp and prepared to return to their civilian lives, ready to answer the call if their country needs them.

  • The AP Interview: Ukraine bets on battlefield AI as the race for weapons autonomy intensifies

    The AP Interview: Ukraine bets on battlefield AI as the race for weapons autonomy intensifies

    As Ukraine defends itself against a larger, better-resourced invading force, the accelerated integration of artificial intelligence into military operations has become an existential priority for the nation, according to a senior Ukrainian defense AI leader. Even as full battlefield-wide AI integration remains a multi-year goal, the technology is already delivering tangible advantages to Kyiv’s frontline forces.

  • The Bank of England is expected to keep interest rates on hold as it weighs the impact of Iran war

    The Bank of England is expected to keep interest rates on hold as it weighs the impact of Iran war

    LONDON – As geopolitical turbulence from the Iran war ripples through global energy markets, the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee is widely projected to hold its benchmark interest rate steady at 3.75% when it announces its latest policy decision on Thursday. Policymakers are treading carefully amid ongoing uncertainty over the conflict’s long-term economic fallout, particularly after Tehran effectively shut down the Strait of Hormuz – a critical global oil chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s crude oil supplies flow during periods of peace.

    Before the outbreak of hostilities between the U.S.-Israel coalition and Iran on Feb. 28, financial markets had been pricing in a potential interest rate cut, with analysts forecasting that U.K. inflation would ease back to the central bank’s 2% target by spring. That outlook has been completely upended by the conflict, which has sent global energy prices surging and forced policymakers across major economies to rewrite their economic projections.

    While the majority of the nine-member policy panel is expected to back a rate hold, insiders and economists suggest one or two members could push for a 25-basis-point hike as a preemptive strike against mounting inflationary pressure. Economists also note the committee is likely to signal that future rate increases remain on the table if the Middle East conflict – currently held in check by a fragile ceasefire – fuels further upward pressure on U.K. consumer prices.

    Sandra Horsfield, a senior economist at global investment firm Investec, emphasized that the economic fallout from the conflict remains acute, with no clear path forward for geopolitical stability in the region. “The repercussions of the conflict are still keenly felt and uncertainty about how the situation could evolve also remains high,” Horsfield noted.

    Beyond the immediate rate decision, all eyes will be on the central bank’s quarterly economic forecast, released alongside the policy announcement, and the subsequent press conference led by Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey. These projections will be the first published since the war began, and economists broadly expect the bank to upgrade its inflation forecasts while downgrading estimates for GDP growth.

    New official data released last week already underscored the inflation threat the conflict has brought to the U.K. Annual consumer price inflation rose to a three-month high of 3.3% in March, up from 3% in February, driven largely by a sharp spike in gasoline and diesel prices stemming from global energy supply disruptions. Economists warn inflation could climb even higher in coming months, potentially hitting 4% as elevated energy costs flow through to household utility bills and broader consumer prices.

    Unlike the energy price shock that followed Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine – which pushed U.K. inflation to a four-decade peak above 11% – most analysts do not expect a return to those extreme levels this time around. Oil and gas prices have not seen the same dramatic spike, and interest rates are already far higher than they were two years ago, which acts as a brake on broad price growth.

    Even so, Bank of England policymakers are closely monitoring for secondary inflationary effects, such as wage increases as workers adjust to higher prices, which could lock in elevated inflation long after the immediate energy shock fades. They are also waiting to see what measures Britain’s Labour government will roll out to buffer households and businesses from rising costs.

    Treasury Chief Rachel Reeves has already acknowledged that the conflict has derailed the government’s progress on easing the cost of living for U.K. households. “This is not our war, but it is pushing up bills for families and businesses,” Reeves said, confirming that the Middle East crisis has thrown U.K. economic policymaking off its pre-war trajectory.

  • US ‘studying’ whether to reduce troops in Germany, Trump says

    US ‘studying’ whether to reduce troops in Germany, Trump says

    A brewing diplomatic spat between US President Donald Trump and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has taken a sharp new turn, with Trump announcing he is actively evaluating a major drawdown of the thousands of American military personnel permanently stationed across Germany. The development comes just days after Merz publicly lambasted Trump’s handling of ongoing tensions surrounding the Iran war, claiming the United States had suffered a public humiliation at the hands of Iranian negotiators.

    In a public post shared to his Truth Social platform, Trump confirmed that his administration is “studying and reviewing the possible reduction of Troops in Germany, with a determination to be made over the next short period of time.” As of last December, the US maintains a substantial military footprint in Germany, with more than 36,000 active-duty service members deployed to bases distributed across the European nation. The BBC has formally contacted the White House to request additional comment on the potential drawdown, and no further details have been released as of press time.

    Merz first made his critical remarks during an address to university students in the German city of Marsberg this Monday. During the talk, he argued that “the Americans clearly have no strategy” for managing negotiations with Iran. He went on to frame recent diplomatic talks as a demonstration of Iranian negotiating skill, noting “the Iranians are obviously very skilled at negotiating, or rather, very skillful at not negotiating, letting the Americans travel to Islamabad and then leave again without any result.” Merz finished his criticism by claiming the entire United States had been “humiliated” by the Iranian leadership.

    The day following Merz’s remarks, Trump took to Truth Social to push back hard against the German chancellor. In his post, Trump claimed Merz believed it was acceptable for Iran to develop a nuclear weapon and argued the chancellor “doesn’t know what he’s talking about.” He went on to lash out at Germany’s broader standing, writing “No wonder Germany is doing so poorly, both Economically, and otherwise!”

    When asked to respond to Trump’s social media attack during a Wednesday press conference, Merz sought to downplay tensions, telling reporters that “the personal relationship between the American president and myself remains just as good as before.” As of Thursday, the German chancellor has not issued any public comment on Trump’s new announcement that he is considering troop reductions.

    This latest exchange comes amid a months-long pattern of aggressive rhetoric from Trump toward US alliances, particularly the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Over the past two months, the US president has repeatedly threatened to withdraw the United States from the 32-member transatlantic alliance, dismissing NATO as a “paper tiger” and claiming the partnership is a “one-way street” that benefits European nations at American expense.

    Earlier in April, a leaked internal Pentagon email laid out potential punitive measures the US could take against allies that refused to back its military and diplomatic campaign in Iran. One of the most controversial proposals outlined in the document suggested the US could push to suspend Spain from NATO over its public opposition to the Iran campaign. In response to the leak, a NATO spokesperson told the BBC that the alliance’s founding charter “does not foresee any provision for suspension of Nato membership, or expulsion”, making any such suspension legally impossible under the bloc’s current rules.

  • Trump says that he’s is weighing reducing American troop presence in Germany after Iran fued

    Trump says that he’s is weighing reducing American troop presence in Germany after Iran fued

    A sharp public rift between U.S. President Donald Trump and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over Washington’s two-month military campaign against Iran has escalated this week, with Trump issuing a new threat to draw down American military forces stationed in Germany, a key NATO ally.

    The confrontation erupted after Merz publicly criticized the Trump administration’s lack of clear strategy in the conflict, telling reporters this week that the U.S. had been “humiliated” by Iranian leadership. On Wednesday, just hours before Trump’s threat, Merz doubled down on his concerns, noting that Germany and the broader European Union have already suffered significant economic damage from the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz – the critical global oil chokepoint that carried roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply before the war began on February 28.

    “We are suffering considerably in Germany and in Europe from the consequences of, for example, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz,” Merz stated Wednesday, adding that he continued to urge a diplomatic resolution to the ongoing conflict. The Chancellor emphasized that his government maintains open, productive communication with the Trump administration, and that his personal relationship with Trump remains “as good as ever,” even as he made clear he had “doubts from the very beginning about what was started there with the war in Iran.”

    This is not the first time Trump has pushed to reduce the U.S. military footprint in Germany. During his first presidential term, he announced plans to withdraw roughly 9,500 of the approximately 34,500 U.S. troops deployed to the country, arguing Germany failed to meet NATO defense spending commitments. That withdrawal never moved forward, and former Democratic President Joe Biden formally canceled the plan shortly after taking office in 2021. Today, Germany hosts some of the most critical U.S. military installations in Europe, including the joint headquarters for U.S. European Command and U.S. Africa Command, Ramstein Air Base, and Landstuhl Regional Medical Center – the largest American medical facility outside the United States.

    Trump has not held back on his frustration with Merz’s public criticism. On Tuesday, he took to social media to attack the German leader, claiming “The Chancellor of Germany, Friedrich Merz, thinks it’s OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon. He doesn’t know what he’s talking about!” He added that it was no surprise “that Germany is doing so poorly, both economically and in other respects!”

    Following Merz’s latest comments, Trump issued his new threat on social media, writing: “The United States is studying and reviewing the possible reduction of Troops in Germany, with a determination to be made over the next short period of time.”

    Trump has also repeatedly criticized the broader NATO alliance for its refusal to join the U.S. and Israel in their war against Iran. The current tensions between the U.S. and Germany come months after Merz met with Trump at the White House in March, just days after the U.S.-Israel bombing campaign of Iran began. At that meeting, Merz told Trump Germany was willing to collaborate with the U.S. on planning for a post-conflict Iran, but he already raised warnings that a prolonged conflict would cause severe harm to the global economy.

    Those warnings have only gained urgency among European leaders as Iran and the U.S. have failed to reach an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Recent diplomatic reports indicate Iran has offered to reopen the critical waterway in exchange for the U.S. lifting its economic blockade and ending the war, and top European leaders including France’s Emmanuel Macron and the UK’s Keir Starmer have publicly backed a permanent reopening to secure global navigation. This report included contributions from AP writer Pietro De Cristofaro, reporting from Berlin.

  • Hungary’s next PM says frozen EU funds will be paid out soon

    Hungary’s next PM says frozen EU funds will be paid out soon

    Weeks after ending 16 years of nationalist rule under Viktor Orbán in a landslide election victory, Hungary’s incoming Prime Minister Péter Magyar has already begun urgent high-stakes diplomacy in Brussels to unlock billions of euros in frozen European Union funds, even before his formal swearing-in next month.

    Magyar, whose newly formed Tisza party secured a two-thirds parliamentary supermajority in the April 12 election, held his first in-person talks with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during his debut visit to the EU capital. He described the negotiations as “extremely constructive and successful,” leaving confident that long-blocked EU resources will flow to Hungary in the near term.

    For years, more than €32.8 billion in combined EU recovery, cohesion, and defense funding has been frozen over the Orbán government’s documented democratic backsliding, systemic corruption, and repeated clashes with EU rule of law standards. On top of the frozen allocations, Hungary has been forced to pay €1 million in daily fines for violating EU migration policies, a penalty Magyar has vowed to end.

    The most pressing deadline facing the incoming government is the expiration of the €10.4 billion EU Covid-19 recovery fund at the end of August. If Budapest fails to meet a pre-set series of anti-corruption and judicial reform milestones by that date, Hungary will lose access to the allocation permanently. Beyond the recovery funds, an additional €6.3 billion in cohesion funds remains blocked over rule-of-law concerns, while another €16.1 billion in low-interest EU defense loans is available once reforms are implemented.

    Magyar moved quickly to reassure both Brussels and Hungarian voters that unlocking the funds will not require concessions harmful to national interests. He emphasized that the unblocked billions will provide a much-needed boost to Hungary’s stagnant economy, which has recorded near-flat growth for three consecutive years. Márton Hajdu, a senior Tisza party official, outlined the straightforward conditions Brussels has required: independent judiciary free from government interference and robust measures to eliminate public sector corruption. While Magyar is pushing for a rapid agreement scheduled to be signed during his return to Brussels on May 25, analysts note the incoming government faces a steep challenge to deliver on the required reforms in such a compressed timeline.

    Von der Leyen struck a collaborative tone after the meeting, saying the European Commission stood ready to support Magyar’s government as it works to realign Hungarian policy with shared European values. Magyar also held talks with European Council President António Costa, and reaffirmed Hungary’s unwavering place in the European Union in a post-meeting social media statement.

    Not yet sworn in until May 9, Magyar has already moved at a breakneck pace to reset Hungary’s relationship with the EU: just two days after his election win, he placed a personal call to von der Leyen to press for progress on fund release. Beyond economic and EU policy, the new government is also moving to repair strained ties with Ukraine. Orbán’s long-held veto on a €90 billion EU loan package for Ukraine was lifted last week at an informal summit the outgoing prime minister declined to attend, and Magyar has extended an offer to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in early June in the Hungarian-majority Ukrainian town of Berehove.

    Political analysts note Magyar enters his term with rare advantages for advancing his reform agenda: his party’s parliamentary supermajority gives Tisza the power to amend the Hungarian constitution unilaterally, and the EU has already signaled significant goodwill toward the new government after years of friction with Orbán’s administration. What remains to be seen is whether Magyar can meet Brussels’ tight reform requirements to unlock the vital funds before the critical August deadline.