标签: Europe

欧洲

  • French singer Patrick Bruel charged with rape, attempted rape and sexual assault

    French singer Patrick Bruel charged with rape, attempted rape and sexual assault

    PARIS — One of France’s most celebrated entertainment figures, 67-year-old singer and actor Patrick Bruel, has been charged with multiple counts of rape, attempted rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment spanning an 11-year period from 2008 to 2019, Nanterre’s public prosecutor’s office confirmed in an official announcement Thursday. The celebrity has repeatedly denied all allegations against him.

    The legal process moved forward this week after Bruel completed two days in police custody. On Wednesday, he was brought before four investigative judges at the Nanterre court, located in the western suburbs of Paris, to hear the formal charges. The ongoing formal investigation covers a specific set of documented accusations: a rape allegation from 2008 in Neuilly-sur-Seine, an attempted rape reported in 2010 in Brussels, and multiple counts of sexual assault and sexual harassment that allegedly took place in 2019 in the southern French city of Perpignan and Ajaccio on the island of Corsica.

    Prosecutors added that the judicial inquiry will also expand to examine additional claims of rape, attempted rape and sexual harassment that occurred between 2010 and 2019 across three other French cities and Nyon, Switzerland. Notably, several accusations that were previously closed without further action have been reopened and added to the current case file.

    Following the hearing, Bruel was released from custody but placed under strict conditional judicial supervision. The terms of his release include a ban on exiting French territory, a requirement to surrender his passport to authorities, a mandate to complete ongoing psychological assessment and treatment, and a €500,000 ($576,760) bail payment. He is also prohibited from making any contact with his accusers or their family members, and barred from entering massage parlors — the location where some of the alleged offenses are said to have occurred.

    In a statement released after the hearing, Bruel’s legal team confirmed that their client will fully cooperate with the ongoing investigation and remains compliant with all requests from judicial authorities.

    The case gained public momentum in recent weeks, after French investigative outlet Mediapart published a series of reports highlighting accusations from multiple women against Bruel that date back decades. Those reports prompted additional accusers to come forward and file new formal complaints with authorities. Prosecutors noted that even accusations from other women that fall outside the applicable statute of limitations have been added to the case file, to allow investigating judges to build a full, comprehensive picture of the claims. Complaints filed in other jurisdictions may also be consolidated into the Nanterre-based investigation at a later date.

    A towering figure in French popular culture, Bruel rose to massive fame across the French-speaking world in the late 1980s and 1990s. His unprecedented popularity earned the nickname “Bruelmania” from French media, a comparison to the global Beatlemania frenzy that surrounded the Beatles in the 1960s. Hit tracks from his 1989 second album became enduring staples of French popular music, exploring relatable universal themes of love, heartbreak, nostalgia and childhood that resonated with cross-generational audiences for decades. Alongside his music career, Bruel built a successful parallel acting career, appearing in dozens of French film and television productions over the course of decades. In response to the emerging allegations last month, Bruel canceled all scheduled public performances planned for this summer across France, Canada, Switzerland and Belgium, as well as his end-of-year tour dates in Canada.

  • Pope Leo heads to Canary Islands to highlight perilous journeys of migrants

    Pope Leo heads to Canary Islands to highlight perilous journeys of migrants

    At 19 years old, Bakary Jaiju made an unthinkable choice: leave behind his young wife and infant child in the Gambia, board an overcrowded wooden dinghy, and cross the deadly Atlantic Ocean to Europe in search of a future he could never build at home. For seven terrifying days at sea, the gravity of his gamble sank in with every passing hour. Food and fresh water dwindled to almost nothing, and sleep became a luxury no one dared afford—one wrong move, and a sleeper would tumble into the churning open water.

    “I decided to go, whether I survive or I die, because I want my family to be in a good condition,” Jaiju recalled from his new home in Tenerife, where he finally landed late last year after surviving the crossing. He counts himself among the extraordinarily lucky. In the months since his arrival, hundreds of other migrants have perished attempting the same treacherous journey, their stories ending before they ever reach Europe’s shores.

    This week, the perilous plight of these migrants and the harrowing survival stories of those who make it will take center stage, as Pope Leo XIV kicks off a visit to Spain’s Canary Islands starting Thursday. The Pope’s focus on migration stands in deliberate contrast to the rising rhetoric of a migration “crisis” and “ideological invasion” that has gained traction across much of Europe.

    Recent data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees confirms that overall migrant sea arrivals to Spain have dropped sharply this year, a decline largely attributed to increased EU-funded interception operations off the coast of West Africa. Even so, thousands of desperate people continue to attempt the crossing, and hundreds continue to lose their lives to the Atlantic. During his trip to Gran Canaria and Tenerife, the Pope will push for expanded “safe and legal pathways” for migration, while calling for a deeply humane approach and a “respectful welcome” for those who have already risked everything to reach European borders. He will also honor those who never made it, dropping a wreath of flowers into the ocean off Gran Canaria to commemorate entire boatloads of migrants that vanished without a trace.

    For Jaiju, survival was only the first hurdle. The 160-person boat that carried him—including dozens of women and children—managed to evade the heightened naval patrols off the coasts of Mauritania and Senegal, only to run out of fuel hundreds of miles from shore. They were eventually spotted and rescued off the small Spanish island of El Hierro. After that, Jaiju spent three freezing, grueling months in a migrant reception camp on Tenerife, before he connected with a local integration project that helps him learn Spanish and navigate the process of securing legal residency.

    The project is the brainchild of Padre Pepe, an outgoing local parish priest who eschews a traditional clerical collar for jeans and checked shirts. He noticed a growing gap in support: local authorities only provided care for underage migrants until they turned 18, after which young people were left completely on their own. “But the streets will eat you up, young people are like carrion there,” Padre Pepe explained. Today, his Good Samaritan Foundation provides housing and vocational training for roughly 170 young migrant men, and the priest argues that local labor markets are more than capable of absorbing these workers. “The labour market could absorb all these people, there is huge demand,” he said. Questioning the increasingly hardline attitudes toward migration across the continent, he added: “It’s hard for me to understand why the human heart is so hard. If we do it well, integrate people well, there is nothing bad in it at all. Quite the contrary.”

    Jaiju’s path to legal status has been smoothed by a controversial one-time policy from Spain’s ruling Socialist government led by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. The administration is currently allowing hundreds of thousands of undocumented migrants who arrived before December 2025 to apply for residence and work permits to regularize their status. Padre Pepe’s team is working around the clock to help as many eligible migrants as possible submit their paperwork before the application deadline closes.

    The policy has drawn fierce condemnation from Spanish opposition groups. The conservative Popular Party has labeled the move “irresponsible” and out of step with EU immigration frameworks, while far-right party Vox has decried it as enabling an “invasion” that will overwhelm the country’s public health system, housing market, and security infrastructure. For the Socialist government, however, the move balances humanitarian principle with practical economic reality: like much of the rest of Europe, Spain faces an aging, shrinking native population and a growing gap in available workers.

    That demand is already visible on the ground in the Canary Islands. At the Domingo Alonso Group, a car dealership and service center in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, managers struggled for months to fill open positions for bodywork painters and panel beaters, unable to recruit local workers. The company partnered with a local government scheme to hire young migrants after they age out of state care, and today the firm employs roughly 30 migrant workers. Initially, the move drew intense backlash online, with critics accusing migrants of “stealing” local jobs, said human resources manager Diana del Molino Rodriguez. “It was a really hard thing to do because immigration was not something seen as positive. Nobody was looking at migrants like persons,” she explained. Today, the program is a success: one of their workers, 19-year-old Tiene Lama from Ivory Coast, earns enough to send hundreds of euros home to his family each month. Dozens of local businesses, including major hotel chains that rely on the islands’ booming tourism industry, have now joined the scheme.

    As Pope Leo works to shift the narrative around migration toward greater compassion, a new EU migration pact is set to take effect this week that will further tighten Europe’s external border controls. The new framework is designed to make it easier to detain and deport migrants who arrive irregularly by sea. For desperate young people like Jaiju, who are already willing to risk death for a better future, policy experts say the new restrictions will do little to deter crossings. Human rights organizations warn the new rules will create new barriers for asylum seekers seeking to have their claims heard.

    The sharpest criticism of the new pact comes from local officials in the Canary Islands, where the policy will be implemented directly. “We have no-one to work in the hotels, drive our buses or work in construction; we don’t have masons or mechanics,” said Francis Candil, the Canary Islands’ deputy minister for welfare. “What we need is a real migration policy that means people from African countries don’t have to risk their lives but can come to Europe and have options for work. Instead, we have Europe trying to protect itself behind walls – and to expel people.”

  • Pope visiting ‘dock of shame’ in Canary Islands where migrants slept in squalor

    Pope visiting ‘dock of shame’ in Canary Islands where migrants slept in squalor

    BARCELONA, Spain — On the final leg of his week-long official visit to Spain, Pope Leo XIV traveled Thursday to the Canary Islands, a Spanish archipelago off the northwest coast of Africa, to honor a long-held wish of his predecessor Pope Francis and shine a global spotlight on the dangerous journey that hundreds of thousands of migrants undertake each year to reach European shores. Positioned far closer to West Africa than to mainland Spain’s Iberian Peninsula, the Canaries have emerged as one of the most pivotal entry points for irregular migration to the European Union, making it a natural epicenter for debates over migration policy across the continent.

    During his two-day visit, the pontiff scheduled a series of engagements: private meetings with migrants who have arrived in the archipelago in recent months, discussions with representatives of Catholic Church outreach groups and humanitarian organizations that provide life-saving aid and integration support for new arrivals, and a solemn commemoration at a site that has become a global symbol of the world’s failure to protect vulnerable migrants: Arguineguin Port, infamously dubbed the “dock of shame” after a 2020 crisis exposed inhumane conditions for displaced people.

    In 2020, a sudden spike in migrant crossings to the Canary Islands overwhelmed local authorities, forcing thousands of new arrivals to camp in open-air makeshift facilities on the port’s dock. For weeks, migrants had access only to basic blankets, with no functioning shower facilities, limited access to food and medical care, and no proper legal support for people seeking international asylum. Many were detained far longer than the 3-day maximum detention period permitted under Spanish law, triggering national outcry. Spain’s national ombudsman eventually ordered the camp closed and all migrants relocated, leaving a permanent stain on the country’s immigration policy reputation.

    Pope Francis, who centered much of his papacy on upholding the biblical call to “welcome the stranger” and made refugee rights a defining policy priority, had long planned to visit the Canary Islands to stand in solidarity with migrants after the 2020 crisis, but he never had the opportunity to make the trip before stepping down. Pope Leo, the first American pope, has carried forward this commitment, emerging as a vocal critic of hardline migration policies both in his home country, where he has pushed back against former President Donald Trump’s mass deportation crackdown, and across the globe.

    Earlier in his Spanish trip, Pope Leo made history by becoming the first pope ever to address the Spanish Parliament, where he delivered a rousing defense of migrant dignity that earned him a seven-minute standing ovation from lawmakers. “The moral greatness of a nation is manifested, above all, in its capacity to accompany, protect and love those lives that are most fragile,” he told the chamber, extending his framing of inherent human dignity to unborn children, the elderly, and people living with terminal illness. Beyond his call for welcome, the pope has pushed for coordinated global action to dismantle human smuggling networks, establish safe, legal migration pathways, and invest in economic development in migrants’ countries of origin to give people the choice to build stable lives at home rather than undertaking dangerous cross-border journeys.

    Spain’s current Socialist-led government has carved out a unique stance on migration relative to many other Western nations, bucking the hardline trend that has taken hold across much of Europe and the United States. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has openly defended liberal immigration policies on both humanitarian and economic grounds, pointing to Spain’s rapidly aging population and chronically low birth rate, which have left critical gaps in the national workforce that immigrant workers can fill. Earlier this year, the administration launched an ambitious regularization campaign that will grant legal status to hundreds of thousands of unauthorized migrants currently living and working in the country.

    Migrant arrivals to the Canary Islands hit a peak of nearly 47,000 people in 2024, but numbers have dropped dramatically in recent years, with just over 2,000 arrivals recorded in the first four months of 2026. Following his visit to the Canaries, Pope Leo will continue his tour of key migration epicenters next month, when he plans to spend U.S. Independence Day on the Italian island of Lampedusa — another major entry point for migrants crossing from North Africa. The visit will echo Pope Francis’ first official trip outside Rome back in 2013, when he traveled to Lampedusa to toss a wreath into the Mediterranean Sea in honor of thousands of migrants who died attempting the crossing, and coined his iconic phrase decrying the “globalization of indifference” that allows the world to turn a blind eye to migrant suffering.

    This coverage from the Associated Press is supported through a collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding provided by Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP retains sole editorial responsibility for all content.

  • What to know about the stabbing that set off fiery riots in Northern Ireland

    What to know about the stabbing that set off fiery riots in Northern Ireland

    BELFAST, Northern Ireland – A brutal street stabbing committed by an asylum-seeking Sudanese man in Northern Ireland has ignited two consecutive nights of violent, arson-fueled rioting, stoked by preexisting anti-migrant rhetoric that has been spreading across parts of the United Kingdom and Europe. The 30-year-old suspect, Hadi Alodid, made his first court appearance at Belfast Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday, where he faced charges including attempted murder, a separate count of threatening to kill, and illegal possession of a bladed weapon.

    According to law enforcement testimony delivered during the hearing, Alodid carried out the attack with a common kitchen knife, leaving his primary victim, Stephen Ogilvie, permanently blinded in the left eye with deep lacerations across the head, face, and back. After the stabbing, while Alodid received medical treatment for a self-inflicted hand wound, he allegedly threatened to kill an attending radiologist. A detective testifying in court shared that Alodid told hospital staff, “I’ve killed someone, I don’t know if they are dead.” To date, investigators have not confirmed a clear motive for the attack, though they have explicitly ruled out terrorism as a driving factor. Alodid declined to secure legal representation through an Arabic interpreter, entered no plea during the Wednesday hearing, and was ordered to remain in custody pending further proceedings.

    The first wave of unrest broke out within hours of the attack on Tuesday, when groups of masked rioters took to Belfast’s streets. The mob set fire to multiple residential properties that they claimed housed migrant families, torched a city bus, and launched a barrage of rocks and other projectiles at responding police officers. Firefighters were forced to carry out dramatic rescue operations to pull trapped residents out of burning homes. By the end of the two days of violence, more than 20 local residents had been left homeless, including African migrant communities already settled in the area. Anselme Shima, a Congolese native who has lived in Belfast for nearly a decade, described the chaos as deeply traumatic. “I’ve lived on my street for almost 10 years, I have a good relationship with my neighbors, but last night was a horrific one,” Shima said. “We don’t know what to do. I’m scared. Seeing this, I’m wondering if I’m next.” Police deployed water cannons to disperse the rioters, who tore bricks and stone chunks from local garden walls and patios to hurl at officers.

    Senior political leaders from both blocs of Northern Ireland’s power-sharing regional government have unanimously condemned the outbreak of violence. First Minister Michelle O’Neill of the Irish nationalist party Sinn Féin labeled the unrest “thuggery,” echoing widespread cross-party rejection of the rioting.

    The current unrest in Belfast mirrors a pattern of anti-migrant violence that has followed recent high-profile stabbing cases across the U.K. over the past two years. Most notably, three young girls were killed in a 2024 stabbing attack at a dance class near Liverpool, which sparked widespread rioting across England and parts of Northern Ireland after false social media claims misidentified the underage suspect as a Muslim asylum seeker. Even after police confirmed the suspect was a British citizen born in Wales, raised by Rwandan Christian parents, violence remained centered on migrant and Muslim communities. The Belfast riots also come just one week after violent clashes between protesters and police in Southampton, which erupted following the sentencing of a man convicted of fatally stabbing university student Henry Nowak.

    In the Southampton case, the stabbing, carried out by Vickrum Digwa, exposed deep tensions over policing and immigration. Judge William Mousley found that Digwa, who used an illegal long dagger after initially carrying a traditional Sikh ceremonial knife, misled police by falsely claiming Nowak had attacked him first, resulting in a life prison sentence. Outrage among far-right groups grew after it was revealed that responding officers, called to the scene of a reported racist assault, misidentified Nowak as the perpetrator. Officers dismissed his dying pleas that he had been stabbed and could not breathe, handcuffing him as he lost consciousness. Nigel Farage, leader of the anti-immigration Reform UK party, seized on the case to promote the far-right talking point of “two-tier policing” – the unsubstantiated claim that British policing systems systematically favor ethnic minorities over white residents. While government officials and police leaders have repeatedly denied the existence of such bias, many independent analysts note that multiple major studies, including a 2022 report on London’s Metropolitan Police, the U.K.’s largest force, have confirmed the force is plagued by widespread institutional racism that disadvantages ethnic minority communities.

    Far-right and anti-immigration activists across social media have actively organized these post-stabbing protests, with prominent international figures amplifying their rhetoric to stoke division. High-profile far-right British activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known by his pseudonym Tommy Robinson, has been a key voice calling protesters to action. Tech billionaire Elon Musk, owner of the social platform X, has amplified the outrage over Nowak’s killing, posting more than 100 times about the case around the time of Digwa’s trial and offering to fund a private prosecution of the local police force. U.S. Vice President JD Vance also waded into the debate, posting on X that the killing was proof of “the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.” U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer pushed back sharply against these foreign interventions, criticizing outside actors “trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets.”

    The unrest in Belfast reflects a broader, years-long surge in anti-immigrant sentiment across the U.K. and much of Western Europe, fueled by ongoing political debates over asylum policy, the steady arrival of asylum seekers via small-boat crossings across the English Channel, and rising public pressure on housing and public services.

    Some British anti-immigration political figures have blamed the open border policy between the U.K.’s Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland for allowing Alodid to enter the region. Alodid reportedly traveled from Paris to Dublin before moving north into Northern Ireland, a path made possible by the free movement policy that has been a core pillar of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, the peace deal that ended 30 years of sectarian conflict known as “The Troubles” that killed nearly 3,600 people. “There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this man should not have been in this country,” Farage said Wednesday. “He entered the country illegally. And is it any surprise that people in Belfast and elsewhere are scared?”

  • G7 summit at Swiss-French border brings tight security in case violent protests occur

    G7 summit at Swiss-French border brings tight security in case violent protests occur

    GENEVA — Ahead of the upcoming G7 summit set to kick off on Monday near Lake Geneva, French and Swiss law enforcement and border officials are rolling out strict, pandemic-style border controls to counter anticipated large-scale and potentially violent protests against the attending leaders, including former U.S. President Donald Trump. The three-day gathering, which runs from June 15 to 17 in the French lakeside town of Evian-les-Bains, brings together the heads of government from the world’s seven largest advanced economies to deliberate on key global issues ranging from Middle East stability and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine to growing global economic imbalances.

    The threat of unrest stems from a long history of disruptive protests at elite global summits, and local stakeholders in nearby Geneva, Switzerland are determined to avoid a repeat of the violent clashes that damaged downtown storefronts during the 2003 G8 summit, when Russia was still a member of the group. This year, a broad coalition of activist groups has organized demonstrations to channel widespread frustration across multiple flashpoints: from Trump’s policy stances on trade tariffs and Middle East conflicts to perceived inaction on climate change, as well as renewed scrutiny of his past ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    The coalition of anti-capitalist, environmental, feminist, and progressive activist groups, which brands itself the No G7 coalition, framed the gathering as a meeting of global powers that perpetuates exploitation and inequality. “As the G7 meets in Evian, France, to plan the destruction of peoples, the exploitation of life and the domination of bodies, let us organize our resistance against fascism and imperialism,” the coalition said in an official call for large-scale international protest mobilization. The standoff between authorities and activists centers on competing priorities: the right of demonstrators to gather and voice dissent, and the right of residents and businesses to be protected from damage and unrest targeting symbols of political and corporate power.

    In preparation for potential unrest, businesses across central Geneva, a major hub for United Nations and global intergovernmental agencies, have already boarded up their storefronts. Several key institutions, including the World Trade Organization — which was the target of massive anti-globalization protests in Seattle in the 1990s — have closed their downtown offices and ordered all non-essential staff to work remotely for the duration of the summit. While Switzerland is not a G7 member state, the close proximity of Geneva to the summit host town makes it a natural gathering point for traveling activists.

    To coordinate security, the two neighboring nations have signed a new military cooperation agreement tailored to the summit. Because Geneva’s main international airport is 95% surrounded by French territory, all arriving G7 leaders will travel through French-controlled airspace and border checks before entering Switzerland. The Swiss federal government confirmed it will deploy roughly 4,000 armed forces personnel to support local police operations, which include sweeping airspace restrictions, floating patrols across Lake Geneva, and targeted closures on cross-border road routes. Only seven of the 35 existing road border crossings between the two countries will remain open for the week, and Geneva officials have permanently closed a major downtown park that activists had selected as their primary protest gathering spot.

    On the French side of the border, security will be even more stringent: more than 13,000 police and gendarmerie officers will be deployed to secure the summit perimeter, with 800 dedicated border control officers on duty — a major jump from the 60 officers that work the crossing on a typical day. French authorities have implemented a special resident permit system for Evian, a town best known globally for its branded bottled water, and cordoned off a large secure exclusion zone around the Hotel Royal, where G7 leaders will hold their closed-door meetings. Only one pre-authorized protest march has been approved, scheduled for June 14 ahead of the summit’s official start, and all unapproved public gatherings are banned for the week.

    Not all observers agree that the harsh security measures are justified. Cedric Dupont, a professor of international relations at the Geneva Graduate Institute, argues that authorities are overreacting to the protest threat, pointing to widespread economic disruption and long border delays similar to those experienced during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. “It seems that they have not learned the lesson,” Dupont said, noting that protesters can easily enter Geneva from other regions of Switzerland regardless of border restrictions. “It’s just creating more problems than actually solving them.”

    The restrictions are already set to upend daily life for cross-border communities. According to the French Foreign Ministry, more than 110,000 commuters cross the France-Switzerland border daily to work in Geneva. French officials have advised all residents to cancel non-essential travel to the region and work from home where possible. Commuter ferry crossings across Lake Geneva that normally stop in Evian have been rerouted to other docks outside the restricted zone, though authorities have confirmed recreational activities such as swimming and paddleboarding will remain permitted in non-restricted areas as the summer tourist season gets underway. To offset expected economic losses for local businesses, the Geneva cantonal government has allocated a 6 million Swiss franc ($7.6 million) compensation fund for any properties damaged during protests. Officials have acknowledged that violent unrest cannot be ruled out entirely, even with the sweeping security measures in place.

  • The ‘King of the North’ seeks a path to becoming Britain’s next leader in a special election

    The ‘King of the North’ seeks a path to becoming Britain’s next leader in a special election

    Deep in the former coal-mining belt of northwest England, 75,000 eligible voters in the Makerfield constituency are preparing to cast ballots that hold the potential to upend the entire trajectory of British national politics. Scheduled for June 18, this special House of Commons by-election is no ordinary midterm vacancy contest: it could elevate a new prime minister to power, deepen the political chaos roiling the nation’s ruling party, or even deliver both outcomes in one blow.

    For decades, this working-class district has been an unshakable stronghold of the center-left Labour Party, holding Labour representation for 120 consecutive years. But this year, the race is anything but predictable, drawing global media attention rarely seen for a single parliamentary by-election. At the center of the contest is Andy Burnham, the wildly popular mayor of Greater Manchester, who has been dubbed the “King of the North” for his regional popularity and independent political brand. Burnham, who is running as Labour’s candidate, needs a parliamentary seat to mount a leadership challenge against embattled incumbent Prime Minister Keir Starmer—whose tenure has been marked by stumbling performance, sinking approval, and growing calls for his resignation from within Labour’s own ranks.

    Starmer’s Labour government, which swept to power in July 2024, has failed to deliver on core campaign promises of economic growth, repaired public services, and relief from the country’s persistent cost-of-living crisis. A series of high-profile missteps—including the controversial appointment of scandal-linked Peter Mandelson as U.S. ambassador—have compounded the party’s woes. Last month’s abysmal local election results triggered open mutiny among Labour lawmakers, forcing cabinet minister Wes Streeting to resign to prepare for an impending leadership contest. A win for Burnham in Makerfield would clear his path to challenge Starmer, making a leadership change that would install him as Britain’s next prime minister almost a foregone conclusion, political analysts say.

    Standing in Burnham’s way is Reform UK, the hard-right anti-immigration party led by veteran populist Nigel Farage. Last month, Farage’s party shocked the political establishment by taking 24 of 25 up-for-grabs local council seats in the Makerfield area, signaling a dramatic erosion of Labour’s longstanding hold on the region. Reform’s candidate, local plumber and sitting councilor Rob Kenyon, is framing the race as a rejection of a failing Labour establishment, tapping into deep voter frustration over the UK’s recent immigration surge. The contest comes as immigration has reemerged as the most polarizing issue in British politics, fueled by high annual net migration in recent years and fresh unrest following a stabbing attack in Belfast that sparked violent arson protests.

    On the ground in Ashton-in-Makerfield, the constituency’s main town, many voters echo Reform’s narrative that record immigration has stretched public housing, healthcare, and other local services to breaking point, with working-class taxpayers bearing the cost. “Immigration’s too high, all the services are being put under pressure and Labour just keep inviting more and more people into the country and it’s the taxpayer who has to pay for them,” said retiree Phil Arrowsmith, one of a growing number of long-time Labour voters abandoning the party in this election. Long-time Makerfield resident Shirley Prior summed up the widespread disillusionment with the status quo: “I think they’re all a waste of time,” she said of the field of candidates, noting she abandoned her family’s generations-long Labour voting pattern years ago.

    Burnham, who has served as Greater Manchester’s mayor since 2017, is leaning hard into his successful regional record to win over skeptical voters. Under his leadership, post-industrial central Manchester has experienced an economic boom, with new skyscrapers transforming once-blighted former factory sites. He won widespread praise for bringing the region’s fragmented public transport system under municipal control as the Bee Network, delivering cheaper, more reliable service for commuters. Though he served 15 years as a Labour MP and cabinet minister before entering regional office, he leans into his “outsider” brand, positioning himself as a leader who can deliver tangible change that London’s political establishment has failed to deliver. “What we’ve built in Greater Manchester needs to go national,” Burnham told reporters at a recent campaign stop. “I know what it is to turn places around.”

    Burnham has acknowledged the deep anger driving support for Reform, calling the party’s rising local support a “cry for real change” that Labour cannot ignore. Even so, he faces a steep uphill battle to hold the seat, with even long-time Labour supporters admitting the unpopularity of Starmer’s national government will make the contest close. Retired teacher and Labour backer Michael Poultney noted that without Burnham’s personal local popularity, the party would struggle to hold the seat. “Keir Starmer has done reasonably well on the international stage, but the government are yet to be in control of the economy,” Poultney explained.

    Burnham for his part has refused to take victory for granted, insisting he is focused on representing Makerfield constituents rather than his national leadership ambitions. “I am making no assumptions beyond the 18th of June,” he said, though he acknowledged the historic stakes of the contest: “this is a change by-election. I will take the fight for the changes I want to see in politics as far as I can take it.” With national leadership hanging in the balance, all eyes of British and global politics will be on this small corner of northwest England when polls open next week.

  • Watch: Thousands fill Barcelona streets for Pope Leo visit

    Watch: Thousands fill Barcelona streets for Pope Leo visit

    Barcelona’s central streets were flooded with thousands of excited attendees this week, as Pope Leo XIV made a high-profile stop at the city’s world-famous Sagrada Família basilica during his seven-day official visit to Spain. The historic landmark, a UNESCO World Heritage Site known for its one-of-a-kind Antoni Gaudí architecture, served as the centerpiece of the pontiff’s itinerary during the Catalan stop of the trip. Crowds lined the thoroughfares leading up to the basilica from early morning, waiting for hours to catch a glimpse of Pope Leo XIV as his motorcade made its way to the iconic site. The week-long visit to Spain marks a key moment in papal engagement with the country’s Catholic community, with the Sagrada Família stop drawing one of the largest public gatherings of the entire trip. Local authorities had deployed enhanced security measures to accommodate the massive turnout, while organizers reported that the crowd remained peaceful and enthusiastic throughout the pontiff’s time at the basilica.

  • French singer Patrick Bruel faces rape charges

    French singer Patrick Bruel faces rape charges

    One of France’s most high-profile entertainment industry figures has become the latest high-profile figure to face legal consequences growing out of the global Me Too movement, with judicial officials opening a formal investigation into Patrick Bruel on multiple counts of rape and sexual abuse.

    After 48 hours of police custody held in Nanterre, a western suburb of the French capital, the 67-year-old multi-hyphenate star – who built his decades-long career as both a chart-topping singer and a successful film and stage actor – appeared before a panel of four investigating judges on Wednesday evening. The panel upheld a request from the state prosecutor to place Bruel under formal judicial investigation over allegations of rape, attempted rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment. A final decision on whether Bruel will remain in pre-trial custody is still pending from a senior judge.

    Throughout the legal process, Bruel has repeatedly and forcefully denied all allegations against him. Under the French judicial system, formal investigative status means an examining magistrate will now conduct a deep-dive review of all claims, with full access granted to Bruel’s legal team to review prosecution evidence. Judicial data shows that this process most often leads to a full public trial in the majority of cases. French legal code defines rape as any non-consensual act of sexual penetration.

    Feminist advocacy groups across France have welcomed the announcement of the investigation, expressing satisfaction that the claims are moving forward through the legal system. The case lands at a moment of intense national scrutiny over how French courts handle sexual offenses, sparked by the high-profile murder of 11-year-old Lyhanna – whose suspected killer had been previously reported for multiple instances of abuse but faced no prior legal consequences.

    Bruel is the second major household name in French entertainment to face widespread sexual abuse allegations in recent years, following fellow actor Gérard Depardieu. The 77-year-old Depardieu received a suspended prison sentence last year on sexual assault charges stemming from an incident on a film set, and he has since filed an appeal to overturn his conviction.

    Born Patrick Benguigui in Algeria in 1959, Bruel launched his entertainment career and rose to stardom in the early 1980s, driven by the massive commercial success of hit singles including *Marre de cette nana-là* (Had Enough of That Chick). His distinctive baritone voice and brooding dark features sparked a nationwide cultural frenzy dubbed “Bruelmania” by contemporary media. Over the course of his career, he has appeared in more than 30 feature films, and most recently headlined a Paris stage production before the allegations came to light.

    In the wake of the new claims, all of Bruel’s remaining performances at the Paris theater were canceled, as were nearly all scheduled stops on a planned international concert tour spanning France, Belgium, Switzerland and Canada. The tour has now been permanently scrapped, according to organizers.

    This is not the first time Bruel has faced sexual misconduct claims: a previous set of sexual harassment complaints against him were closed in 2020 after investigators cited a lack of sufficient evidence to proceed. In May of this year, French investigative news outlet Mediapart published a bombshell report revealing that roughly 30 women had come forward with consistent accounts of harassment or assault at Bruel’s hands, with many of the alleged incidents occurring on film sets or in backstage areas at music venues.

    Last month, a high-profile accuser joined the list of claimants: well-known French television and radio presenter Flavie Flament, who alleged that in 1991, when she was 16 years old and Bruel was 32, he drugged and raped her at his private Paris residence. The Flament allegation is not included among the nine counts formally cited by judges in the current investigation, as the statute of limitations for the alleged crime has expired. However, the state prosecutor has formally requested that Flament’s claim and 12 other additional older allegations be re-evaluated for potential inclusion in the formal charges.

    Reaffirming his denial of all wrongdoing, Bruel told French media in recent comments that he acknowledged he may have been “heavy-handed” in past interactions, but insisted he “always took no for an answer.” In a public Instagram post shared last month, the star wrote: “I have never in my life forced myself on a woman. Nor have I ever drugged, manipulated or tried to subjugate anyone… nor used my fame to abuse or obtain non-consensual relations.”

  • Norway crown princess’s son to stay in custody before rape verdict, says court

    Norway crown princess’s son to stay in custody before rape verdict, says court

    In a high-profile legal decision that has gripped Norway and drawn new scrutiny to the country’s royal household, Oslo’s Court of Appeal has rejected a bid to release Marius Borg Høiby, the son of Crown Princess Mette-Marit, from pre-verdict custody, reversing a lower court’s ruling that would have freed him ahead of his upcoming rape trial verdict.

    Høiby, 29, has been held in custody since early February 2026, when he was detained ahead of trial on 40 separate criminal charges, including four counts of rape, multiple counts of assault, violation of a restraining order, drug possession, and traffic offenses. He has consistently denied the most severe allegations, including all rape and relationship violence charges, though he has admitted to some lesser offenses. The case against Høiby first emerged in August 2024, when he was arrested at an ex-girlfriend’s apartment in Oslo’s upscale Frogner neighborhood, where a restraining order barred him from contacting her.

    The release request came amid a devastating health update for Høiby’s mother, 52-year-old Crown Princess Mette-Marit, who has lived with a rare, incurable form of pulmonary fibrosis since 2018. Last week, her medical team confirmed her condition has deteriorated sharply over the past three months, placing her on a waiting list for a life-saving lung transplant. Per Norwegian transplant protocol, placement on the list indicates doctors estimate the patient has less than 12 months to live without the procedure. Pulmonary fibrosis causes progressive scarring of lung tissue, restricting breathing and oxygen flow through the bloodstream.

    Høiby’s legal team argued that their client should be granted temporary release to be by his mother’s side during her health crisis. “Sitting inside when I know Mum is so sick is unbearable,” Høiby told Oslo District Court earlier this week. On Monday, the lower court sided with the defense, ruling that while there was a small risk of reoffending, Høiby had remained drug-free in custody, and continued detention would be “disproportionately intrusive.”

    That ruling was quickly appealed by prosecutors, and on Wednesday the higher court rejected the release order entirely. The Court of Appeal found that the risk of Høiby reoffending and making prohibited contact with the Frogner ex-girlfriend remained “virtually unchanged” from its previous May 13 assessment, with no new evidence to justify altering his custodial status.

    “We are very, very disappointed on behalf of our client. One can imagine how he feels,” Ellen Holager Andenæs, one of Høiby’s two defense attorneys, told local Norwegian media outlets after the ruling. Prosecutors have requested a seven-year and seven-month prison sentence for Høiby, and the three judges presiding over the six-week trial are set to deliver their full verdict on all 40 charges next Monday.

    Though Høiby was born before Mette-Marit married Crown Prince Haakon, the heir to the Norwegian throne, and is not an official member of the royal family, he has been raised within the royal household. The ongoing legal proceeding, compounded by recently revealed details of a three-year friendship between Mette-Marit and disgraced deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has created significant public controversy and cast a shadow over the Norwegian royal institution.

    The royal family has remained visible amid the dual crises: Crown Prince Haakon and Crown Princess Mette-Marit visited Høiby in Oslo prison last Sunday, shortly after her transplant waiting list placement was made public. The couple’s two children, Princess Ingrid Alexandra and Prince Sverre Magnus, visited Høiby hours after Mette-Marit was admitted to hospital last Thursday. Høiby was granted a temporary furlough from custody on Monday to meet with his mother’s medical team at the royal family’s Skaugum estate outside Oslo.

    Norway’s elderly monarchs, 89-year-old King Harald V and 88-year-old Queen Sonja, have largely stayed out of the recent crises, though during a public royal engagement on Tuesday, Queen Sonja confirmed to reporters that “the situation is serious” regarding the crown princess’s health.

  • Ukraine says missiles hit military plant deep inside Russia

    Ukraine says missiles hit military plant deep inside Russia

    In a significant escalation of cross-border strikes, Ukrainian forces have carried out a rare long-range missile attack on a major Russian military production facility deep inside Russian territory, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has confirmed. The strike, carried out overnight using newly developed FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles, targeted a drone and missile manufacturing plant in Cheboksary, a city located in Russia’s Chuvash Republic more than 900 kilometers from the active front lines in eastern and southern Ukraine.

    Zelensky announced the operation in an official post on his Telegram channel Wednesday, confirming that the strike hit the VNIIR-Progress plant, a facility that produces critical components for Moscow’s military drone and missile programs used in its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. He also published purported footage of the operation, showing a missile in flight toward the target followed by plumes of smoke rising from the facility after impact. Oleg Nikolaev, the head of the Chuvash Republic, confirmed a missile strike had hit the city and reported three people injured, though he did not publicly confirm damage to the military facility.

    The FP-5 Flamingo missile used in the attack carries a 1,150-kilogram warhead and has an advertised maximum range of 3,000 kilometers, a capability that places Moscow and nearly all of Russia’s major population and industrial centers well within Ukrainian strike range. This development marks a notable advancement in Ukraine’s domestic long-range strike capacity, as Kyiv works alongside its Western allies to expand its missile arsenal to put increased pressure on Russia’s war machine.

    Alongside the Cheboksary strike, Ukrainian military officials also confirmed additional simultaneous strikes on other Russian positions and critical infrastructure: the Moscow-occupied Sea of Azov port of Mariupol, a Russian oil refinery in Samara, and an oil tanker belonging to Russia’s shadow fleet operating in the Black Sea.

    The Cheboksary attack comes amid a months-long pattern of intensified Ukrainian strikes on key Russian facilities far from the front, though deep penetration missile attacks of this nature remain rare. Kyiv has repeatedly stated that any infrastructure supporting Russia’s invasion, including energy and military production sites, qualifies as a legitimate military target, arguing that disrupting these supply chains raises the cost of Moscow’s invasion and forces it to consider negotiated peace. So far, however, Russian President Vladimir Putin has rejected all of Kyiv’s proposals for peace talks. Just last week, Putin claimed there was no purpose in holding a face-to-face meeting with Zelensky after the Ukrainian leader had requested direct negotiations to end the conflict. The Kremlin leader also repeated his claim that Russian forces are advancing across the entire front line, despite open source and independent reporting showing the front has remained largely static for months.

    The overnight exchange of fire between the two sides extended far beyond the long-range strike. Russia’s defense ministry announced that its air defense systems intercepted or shot down 326 Ukrainian drones launched across multiple Russian regions overnight. On the Ukrainian side, the country’s air force reported it had downed 181 of 207 Russian drones launched at Ukrainian targets overnight, and confirmed 21 direct Russian hits across 14 separate locations across the country.

    Local Ukrainian officials reported that Russian strikes over the preceding 24 hours have left at least two civilians dead and 26 more injured, including two children, across four Ukrainian regions. Among the latest Russian attacks is a drone strike on the northeastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv, where police experts were seen assessing the damage to impacted sites, per Reuters reporting.