标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Russian families use AI to ‘resurrect’ loved ones killed in Ukraine

    Russian families use AI to ‘resurrect’ loved ones killed in Ukraine

    Since mid-2025, a new, deeply divisive trend has taken root on Russian social media: AI-generated videos that depict Russian soldiers serving in Ukraine returning home to their families, or appearing as peaceful spiritual figures after their deaths. For grieving relatives, these clips can offer a fragile, longed-for sense of closure. But critics denounce the practice as unethical, exploitative, and a dangerous distortion of the reality of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    The trend gained widespread attention after a 15-second AI-generated clip posted by popular blogger Katya Jin went viral. Set against a backdrop of snowy Moscow streets, the video features billboards bearing the message: “The Special Military Operation is over. Our heroes are coming home” – language that mirrors the Kremlin’s official framing of its war on Ukraine. At the center of the clip is a reunion: an airbrushed woman pushing a stroller hugs a man in military uniform, tears in her eyes. The fictional couple is modeled on Jin and her own husband, who, like tens of thousands of Russian troops, went missing on the front line, his fate still unconfirmed.

    Jin was not the only creator behind this content. Until recently, she shared regular AI videos with her 10 million TikTok followers and 50,000 Instagram followers, even offering step-by-step tutorials for making similar clips. She also turned her personal grief into a commercial service: customers could submit photos of their own missing or deceased loved ones, and Jin would generate custom AI videos for a fee. Dozens of relatives placed orders, hoping to see a final embrace or peaceful final moment with the soldiers they lost. After BBC Russian reached out to Jin for comment, she removed all of her AI-generated content from her social media accounts and did not respond to questions.

    Across Russia, other creators have built similar businesses around the trend. Anna Korableva, based in the Ural Mountain town of Kamensk-Uralsky, launched her “Farewell Video” project alongside her sister in May 2025. Korableva says her goal is to help families process “unfinished farewells,” giving them the chance to “embrace” husbands, fathers, and children one more time. “In the first months of working on these videos, I cried almost every day,” she told the BBC. “Over time, I learned to separate my emotions from work. I try to focus on the technical side, to make sure the video turns out beautiful and worthy of someone’s memory.” Most of Korableva’s requests come from families of soldiers killed in Ukraine since Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion.

    As of 2026, a joint investigation by the BBC, Russian independent outlet Mediazona, and volunteer researchers has verified the deaths of at least 225,000 Russian soldiers in the war, with the true death toll widely believed to be far higher. Russian state officials have never released full, reliable casualty figures, and generally avoid public discussion of mass military deaths.

    Most AI-generated clips follow a predictable, sentimental narrative. For killed soldiers, common tropes show the uniformed man embracing his family, then walking slowly up a staircase into a bright blue sky, often flanked by angels, or appearing as a gentle “ghost” embracing his family from heaven. Videos for soldiers still serving on the front sometimes add symbolic angel wings to shield the man from harm. In nearly all clips, the reality of the war in Ukraine – the Russian invasion, widespread destruction, and Ukrainian civilian and military casualties – is entirely erased, with Russian soldiers uniformly framed as heroic defenders of their homeland and families.

    This whitewashing has sparked fierce outrage among Ukrainians who encounter the clips online. “You should be ashamed to show your ‘heroes’ who went to earn blood money by killing our children,” one Ukrainian commenter wrote.

    International generative AI tools have been largely blocked or restricted for users in Russia, pushing customers to turn to local independent creators like Jin and Korableva. Prices for custom AI content range from just 200 roubles (£2) to 10,000 roubles (£100), and quality varies widely: some low-budget clips produce distorted figures with missing limbs or grotesquely altered faces. Even so, low production costs allow popular creators to turn a significant profit. Ulyana Lebed, a creator whose husband is also a Russian serviceman, told the BBC she earns between 150,000 and 200,000 roubles (£1,500 to £2,000) per month – roughly double the average Russian monthly wage. This commercialization has drawn criticism from online users who accuse creators of cashing in on mass grief: “Be careful that loss doesn’t come knocking at your door. Some subjects should not be touched — but you just wanted to make money,” one commenter wrote under a AI clip of a dead soldier.

    Academics studying the trend say it fits into a growing global “digital afterlife” industry that uses AI to create posthumous avatars and content for deceased people, already seen in museums, courtrooms, and political campaigns. It is no surprise, experts say, that this trend has flourished amid a brutal war where mass death and grief are pervasive. But the ethical and psychological impacts remain deeply understudied and hotly contested.

    “Creating ‘deadbots’ of Russian soldiers or deepfakes of fallen Russian soldiers returning from Ukraine is extremely complex and ethically difficult to assess in a clear-cut way,” explained Katarzyna Nowaczyk-Basińska, a researcher at the University of Cambridge’s Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence. Ethically, she notes, the political context of the war makes these videos deeply problematic. Psychologically, it remains unclear whether AI-generated depictions help grieving families process loss or trap them in unhealthy denial that deepens their pain. “In a sense, we are all in the midst of a technological and cultural experiment,” she said.

    Reactions from people who have commissioned these AI works are similarly divided. Some say the clips provide no meaningful comfort, calling them what they are: an illusion. “Could technology help me accept that I will never hug my son again? No. It’s an illusion,” one grieving mother told the BBC. Another woman, who bought an AI-generated photo of her late husband for his headstone, said, “Psychologically, no, of course it didn’t help – how could it?” even as she hung two other AI prints of him in her bedroom. For others, however, the virtual connection offers a small, valuable sense of peace, even if it exists only in a digital fantasy. “Thank you, AI, for this opportunity to be with my loved one,” one Russian woman wrote beneath a farewell video of her husband, who has been dead for nearly two years.

  • Norway braces for verdict in rape trial of crown princess’s son Høiby

    Norway braces for verdict in rape trial of crown princess’s son Høiby

    As Oslo District Court prepares to deliver a highly anticipated verdict on Monday morning, Norway stands at the intersection of a high-profile criminal case and an unprecedented crisis gripping its royal household. Three judges in Courtroom 250 will reveal the length of the sentence for 29-year-old Marius Borg Høiby, the son of Crown Princess Mette-Marit, who faces a total of 40 criminal charges including four counts of rape. Due to unspecified health reasons, Høiby will not appear in person for the ruling, instead joining the court session remotely via video link, nearly three months after his trial concluded.

    Høiby has maintained his innocence on all the most serious sexual offense charges, but has taken responsibility for a series of lesser offenses, including drug possession and trafficking, as well as multiple traffic violations. The gulf between the two sides’ sentencing requests is stark: state prosecutors have pushed for a combined prison term of seven years and seven months, while Høiby’s defense team has argued that a 18-month custodial sentence is appropriate. Høiby has remained in custody since early February, after police took him into custody shortly before the trial opened on additional suspicion of assault and violating a restraining order related to a former romantic partner. All repeated applications for his release filed by his legal team have been rejected by Norwegian courts.

    The criminal case has unfolded against a devastating backdrop of personal and family crisis for the Norwegian royal family. Just over a week ago, Crown Princess Mette-Marit — Høiby’s mother, who married into the royal family when Høiby was four years old — was placed on a national lung transplant waiting list, with her medical team confirming that the placement reflects a prognosis that she has approximately one year left to live without a transplant. Last week, an appellate court turned down a desperate request to allow Høiby temporary release from prison to be with his ailing mother, who has been visited in her hospital stay by Høiby and her husband, Crown Prince Haakon, who has stepped back from all public royal duties to care for her. The crown princess, who has suspended all public engagements and now requires a nasal breathing tube, retains broad public sympathy, a shift from earlier in the proceedings when public anger flared over revelations of her three-year friendship with deceased disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein between 2011 and 2014.

    While Høiby has never formally held a place in the line of royal succession or been an official working member of the royal family, he grew up alongside his and Mette-Marit’s royal children, and any lengthy custodial sentence is expected to cast a long shadow of public scrutiny over the entire Norwegian monarchy, which has already been grappling with overlapping crises for months. At 89 years old, popular reigning King Harald and 88-year-old Queen Sonja have very limited public options to address the unfolding controversy, according to royal observers.

    Throughout the trial, Crown Prince Haakon, who is set to become Norway’s next king, has walked a careful line between maintaining quiet support for Høiby and acknowledging the gravity of the allegations from the four women who have accused him of rape. All four accusers have been granted anonymity by the court, which also banned publication of any photos of the women or the defendant. The only exception was high-profile influencer Nora Haukland, a former girlfriend of Høiby, who alleges he assaulted, hit, and choked her — claims Høiby denies. Footage of Haukland leaving the court after giving testimony dominated front-page coverage across Norway, as one of the few public, identifiable faces in a trial otherwise documented only by courtroom sketches.

    Prosecutors detail that the four alleged rapes occurred when the victims were either asleep or incapacitated after consensual sexual activity with Høiby, who continues to deny all four charges. Prosecutors have requested conviction on 39 of the 40 total charges, which also include multiple counts of physical and psychological abuse against former romantic partners. One woman, referred to publicly as the “Frogner woman” after the upscale Oslo neighborhood where she lives, is linked to multiple charges; Høiby has partially admitted charges of serious bodily harm and abuse against her, but denies non-consensual sexually explicit filming of her or any other woman. The charges Høiby has admitted to include trafficking 3.5 kilograms of marijuana, driving without a valid license, reckless driving, and one count of violating a restraining order. A few days ahead of the verdict, Høiby was transferred to Ila Prison and Detention Centre, located on the outskirts of Oslo.

    Early in the trial, Høiby broke down in tears while addressing the court, attributing his harmful behavior to an “extreme need for affirmation” and his long-held public reputation as “mamma’s son.” That level of public drama will not be repeated on Monday: his video reaction to the verdict will only be visible to those present in the main courtroom and two designated overflow viewing rooms.

    Monday’s verdict will close a legal process that began with Høiby’s initial arrest in August 2024, but it will not resolve long-simmering questions about the future of the Norwegian monarchy, concerns that were first raised publicly more than two decades ago. In a television interview, King Harald’s late elder sister Princess Ragnhild noted that when Haakon and Mette-Marit had their first biological child, young Marius would be left in an ambiguous position with no formal royal role — a prediction that many royal commentators argue has been borne out by the current crisis.

    Reputation and public relations specialist Peggy Simcic Brønn, professor emerita at BI Norwegian Business School, describes the situation as an institutional crisis and a major collapse of public trust in the monarchy. “Things cannot go on as they are, they just can’t. This is an institutional crisis, and it’s a huge crisis of trust,” she said, warning that international scrutiny will surge in the coming week, and that the royal family’s failure to address the controversy openly will only worsen damage to its reputation.

    With Mette-Marit’s health rapidly declining, crafting a coherent public response has become even more challenging. Mette-Marit addressed public pressure over her Epstein friendship in a March television interview, saying she “didn’t know he was a sex offender or a predator,” but many commentators argued the interview left more questions unanswered than it resolved. The royal household has announced no further joint public interviews will be held in the near term, and the planned celebration of Haakon and Mette-Marit’s silver wedding anniversary in August has been canceled. The palace says it will not issue any further public updates on Mette-Marit’s condition until after a lung transplant is completed.

    Many Norwegians have looked to Crown Prince Haakon to provide leadership through the overlapping crises, but he has stepped back from all official duties to care for his wife. He recently canceled a trip to Stockholm to attend the Swedish royal family’s golden wedding anniversary, and missed a regular weekly cabinet meeting with King Harald the previous week. For now, any effort to repair the royal family’s damaged reputation will have to wait.

  • David Raya praises Unai Simón and downplays goalkeeping debate ahead of Spain’s World Cup opener

    David Raya praises Unai Simón and downplays goalkeeping debate ahead of Spain’s World Cup opener

    As Spain gears up to kick off its 2025 FIFA World Cup campaign in Group H against Cape Verde in Atlanta on Monday, longstanding speculation over who will claim the starting goalkeeper spot has intensified – but one of the contenders is working to ease the tension around the discussion. On Saturday, Brentford-turned-Arsenal shot-stopper David Raya shifted the narrative, heaping praise on first-choice keeper Unai Simón and emphasizing the entire squad is aligned around the national team’s goal of a second World Cup title.

    For months, debate has swirled around coach Luis de la Fuente’s eventual selection. Simón has held the starting role consistently since de la Fuente took charge of La Roja, backstopping the side to major international silverware in recent years. But standout club seasons from Spain’s entire three-man goalkeeper corps have sparked calls for a potential change. Raya turned in elite performances for Arsenal this season, helping the London club secure the Premier League title and advance to the UEFA Champions League final. Meanwhile, Joan García claimed the Spanish La Liga title with Barcelona this campaign and earned the league’s award for best goalkeeper for his form.

    Rather than lean into the competition for the starting spot, Raya struck a unifying tone during Saturday’s comments, one day before Spain’s opening match. ‘Spain is in very good hands no matter who gets to play,’ he told reporters. ‘I think Unai Simón, since his debut, has raised the level of the goalkeeping position. We won the Nations League and the European Championship with him. And I think he’s a great goalkeeper who has given us these titles as the starter.’

    De la Fuente has declined to name his starting goalkeeper ahead of the opener, a decision that only amplified public discussion of the position in Spain. The coach rotated all three keepers through warm-up matches in the lead-up to the World Cup, though Simón was selected to start in the team’s final preparation fixture.

    Raya framed the healthy competition between the keepers as a strength for the national side, not a source of division. ‘It’s normal to have a debate,’ he said. ‘There’s always been a lot of competition among the goalkeepers that we’ve had. It’s about camaraderie, striving to be better, to make the coach’s job difficult. We’re all here to help the team. Whoever gets to play will do their best.’

    Saturday marked Spain’s final practice session at its pre-tournament training camp in Tennessee, before the squad traveled to Atlanta for its opening group stage fixture. Good news for de la Fuente: the full Spanish squad will be available for selection on Monday, after key forwards Víctor Muñoz, Lamine Yamal and Nico Williams all returned to full training this week following minor injury recoveries.

    After Monday’s clash with Cape Verde, Spain will face Saudi Arabia in Atlanta on June 21 for its second group stage match, before wrapping up Group H play against Uruguay on June 26 in Guadalajara, Mexico.

    Spain enters this World Cup on a strong run of recent international form, coming off back-to-back major trophy runs after disappointing performances in past World Cups. The side was knocked out in the round of 16 by Morocco at the 2022 Qatar World Cup, but rebounded to claim the 2023 UEFA Nations League title and win the 2024 European Championship in Germany. Most recently, Spain finished as runners-up to Portugal in the 2025 Nations League. Despite consistent success in other competitions, Spain has not advanced past the round of 16 at the World Cup since claiming its only World Cup title in 2010, making a deep run in this tournament a top priority for the squad.

  • Tens of thousands join Pride marches in Romania, Bulgaria to call for equality

    Tens of thousands join Pride marches in Romania, Bulgaria to call for equality

    On a recent Saturday, tens of thousands of LGBTQ+ advocates and their allies flooded the central streets of Bucharest, Romania’s capital, and Sofia, Bulgaria’s capital, for their annual Pride parades, staging a public call for equal rights and legal recognition amid growing pushback from conservative and religious factions in the two majority Eastern Orthodox Christian nations.

    Marchers in both capitals carried vibrant rainbow flags, sounded whistles, and chanted demands for equal treatment under the law, highlighting the stark gap between the European Union’s non-discrimination standards and the domestic legal status of LGBTQ+ people in both countries. Both Romania and Bulgaria gained EU membership back in 2007, and each implemented sweeping human rights reforms to meet the bloc’s accession requirements at the time. Yet decades later, public and institutional support for LGBTQ+ rights lags far behind most other EU member states. In ILGA-Europe’s 2025 Rainbow Map, which ranks European countries based on the strength of their legal and policy protections for LGBTQ+ communities, the two nations hold the bottom two spots among the EU’s 27 members. Neither country currently offers legal recognition for same-sex partnerships, let alone same-sex marriage, even though EU law explicitly prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

    Alina Purcaru, a Bucharest-based writer who participated in the Romanian capital’s Pride march, described the deep-seated cultural barriers that LGBTQ+ Romanians continue to face. “We still have a deeply conservative society, with very strong traditional values,” Purcaru explained. “We still live in a patriarchy, sometimes explicit … with a lot of prejudice and a lot of fear.” For activists, the core demand of this year’s marches centered on establishing legal recognition for civil partnerships, a change that would grant same-sex couples access to fundamental legal protections that most couples take for granted.

    Vlad Viski, president of Romanian LGBTQ+ rights NGO MozaiQ, told reporters that these legal protections are not abstract privileges but essential to daily life. “We are talking about essential rights, such as the right to inheritance, hospital visits, medical decisions, survivor’s pension,” Viski said. In Sofia, Simeon Vassilev, one of the lead organizers of Sofia Pride, echoed that sentiment, noting that thousands of same-sex couples in Bulgaria already build shared lives, raise children, and care for one another, yet have no access to legal safeguards for their relationships. “Thousands of same-sex couples live together, build homes, raise children, and care for one another … without the right to legal protection or recognition of their relationships,” Vassilev told journalists.

    Human rights organizations monitoring the region have documented a steady rise in open hostility and targeted hate speech against LGBTQ+ communities in both countries over the past several years. That opposition was on full display on Saturday, as anti-Pride rallies organized by conservative, nationalist, and religious groups were held in both capitals simultaneously. In Sofia, the annual “March of the Family,” launched by right-wing and religious groups in 2021, gathered to promote what organizers call “Christian, patriotic and traditional values.” The Bulgarian Orthodox Church, which counts roughly 80% of the country’s population as its members, publicly stated its disagreement with Pride’s messaging and blessed the anti-Pride rally, framing traditional marriage as a core social institution. In Bucharest, a nationalist group held a parallel “March for Normality” opposing LGBTQ+ rights.

    This year’s Sofia Pride was organized under the slogan “Different Together,” a deliberate framing designed to counter the polarizing anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric that has become increasingly mainstream in Bulgarian politics. Notably, the governing Progressive Bulgaria party, led by Prime Minister Rumen Radev which won April’s general election, publicly backed the “March of the Family” in a parliamentary statement, calling the traditional nuclear family “a cornerstone of our national security, identity and future.” The Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, one of the country’s leading human rights watchdog groups, condemned the ruling party’s statement, arguing that it effectively enshrines a hierarchy of citizenship that marks LGBTQ+ Bulgarians as second-class citizens by framing one group of relationships as more valuable than another.

  • Thousands march in Rome in anti- and pro-migration rallies

    Thousands march in Rome in anti- and pro-migration rallies

    ROME — Italy’s capital became the stage for two massive dueling demonstrations on Saturday, as a far-right grassroots initiative pushing hardline anti-migration policies crossed the threshold to force parliamentary consideration, catapulting the once-marginal idea of “remigration” into the center of national political discourse. The initiative, branded “Remigration and Reconquest,” collected the 50,000 certified signatures required to trigger a parliamentary discussion on its proposal, though no voting timeline has been set to date.

    The proposal, advanced by a coalition of right-wing extremist groups, outlines sweeping measures targeting non-Italians that include forced deportations, state-funded incentives for voluntary departure, and broad policy language that critics warn could be extended to target even legal residents and naturalized citizens. On Saturday, several thousand anti-migration demonstrators traveled from across the country to Rome to rally in support of the plan. Video and on-the-ground reports show crowd members singing the Italian national anthem, and multiple instances of demonstrators raising their arms in the fascist salute while chanting “Duce! Duce!” — the infamous honorific for Benito Mussolini, the fascist dictator who ruled Italy from 1922 to 1943.

    Countering that demonstration, tens of thousands of pro-migration protesters gathered in a separate district of Rome Saturday evening. The pro-migration rally drew support from a broad coalition of left-wing political parties, major national trade unions, and immigration advocacy groups, with many attendees also waving Palestinian flags in a show of solidarity amid the ongoing Gaza conflict.

    Italian authorities deployed thousands of police officers across the city to keep the two opposing protest groups separated, a precaution that prevented violent clashes. Officials confirmed no incidents of violence were reported by the end of the day.

    The heated national debate over the proposal presents a delicate political tightrope for Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s ruling right-wing coalition. While the anti-immigration League party has thrown its support behind opening parliamentary debate, Meloni’s own Brothers of Italy party and its centrist coalition partners have been far more cautious about backing a plan tied to extremist circles. Leaders have raised concerns about potential legal challenges to the proposal and the risk of deepening internal rifts within the governing alliance.

    Opposition parties and legal scholars have repeatedly warned that the plan violates both Italy’s constitution and international anti-discrimination law, as it explicitly targets people on the basis of ethnic origin — a classification that would include naturalized Italian citizens and even their Italian-born descendants.

    Notably, the controversy over the “remigration” proposal comes as Meloni’s government is simultaneously pursuing an expansion of legal migration to solve pressing labor gaps. Last year, the administration approved a multi-year plan that will allow hundreds of thousands of non-European Union workers to enter Italy legally to fill shortages in key sectors including agriculture, manufacturing, and care work.

    Saturday’s protests also came 24 hours after a landmark new European Union migration policy went into force across all 27 member states. The EU Migration and Asylum Pact represents the culmination of years of fractious, deadlocked negotiations to replace the bloc’s previous migration framework, which was widely discredited as a dysfunctional failure. That old system’s collapse opened political space for far-right parties across the continent to weaponize public anxiety over migration to gain electoral support.

  • Thousands rally in Belfast to condemn anti-immigrant rioting that followed stabbing

    Thousands rally in Belfast to condemn anti-immigrant rioting that followed stabbing

    LONDON – In a powerful rebuke of days of race-fueled arson and unrest sparked by a violent criminal incident, thousands of peaceful demonstrators gathered in Belfast on Saturday to condemn the anti-immigrant rioters whose actions left dozens homeless and multiple police officers injured earlier that week.

    The chaos erupted after a 30-year-old asylum seeker from Sudan was taken into custody on attempted murder charges connected to a brutal stabbing that left a local victim permanently partially blind. What began as public outcry over the attack was quickly manipulated into widespread violence by far-right and anti-immigrant agitators, despite repeated calls for calm from Northern Irish officials and even the stabbing victim’s own family.

    Groups of masked rioters targeted residential properties believed to house immigrant families, setting several homes and parked vehicles ablaze, torching a public bus, and launching a barrage of bricks, glass bottles, and firebombs at responding law enforcement. In the aftermath of the four nights of unrest, officials labeled the unrest organized thuggery that left more than 20 people displaced from their destroyed homes and 12 police officers injured.

    By Saturday, anti-racism organizers pulled together a large public rally outside Belfast City Hall to push back against the narrative of hate that had dominated headlines. Many demonstrators carried hand-painted signs with messages rejecting the conflation of criminality with race, including slogans like “The problem is evil & violence not race,” “Your racism is not patriotism,” and “Protect people not prejudice.”

    For some attendees, joining the rally was an unplanned but necessary choice. Newlyweds Cara Bell and Matthew Richardson had just wrapped up their wedding ceremony inside Belfast City Hall when they stepped out to join the crowd, still reeling from the violence they had watched unfold across the city days earlier. Bell emphasized that the large turnout of peaceful protesters told a far more accurate story of Belfast’s community than the riots had.

    “It’s important to note that things like today really show that this is not the general feeling of people in Belfast,” Bell told reporters. “It was a week where you’ve seen the worst of humanity and the best of humanity in Belfast.”

    Elaine Crory, one of the rally speakers, told the gathered crowd that racism in the region remains a persistent threat that can be reignited almost instantly after a single high-profile incident involving a non-local, non-white person. “All it takes is for one person who’s not white and local to commit a crime and that fire of racism is rekindled,” she said.

    The unrest was not limited to Northern Ireland. Across the United Kingdom, far-right groups capitalized on the stabbing to incite anti-immigrant disorder in multiple cities. In Glasgow, Scotland, rioters targeted minority communities, forcing worshippers at a local mosque into lockdown as the violence surrounded the site.

    In a parallel show of solidarity on Saturday, thousands of Glasgow residents also gathered for an anti-racism rally organized by local activist groups, aimed at reclaiming the city’s streets from far-right extremism. The anti-racism gathering was met by a small but aggressive counter-group, primarily made up of men who were documented making Nazi salutes and shouting anti-Muslim slurs. In response, the thousands of anti-racism demonstrators chanted in unison: “Nazi scum off our streets.”

  • Trump and Macron will meet over dinner at Versailles palace after G7 summit in France

    Trump and Macron will meet over dinner at Versailles palace after G7 summit in France

    As leaders of the world’s major industrialized economies prepare to gather in southern France for next week’s G7 summit, new details have emerged about the packed diplomatic agenda awaiting former U.S. President Donald Trump, including a high-profile celebratory dinner with French President Emmanuel Macron at the iconic Palace of Versailles.

    Senior White House administration officials, speaking to reporters on condition of anonymity under the White House’s established press ground rules, confirmed Saturday that the summit will bring a full slate of one-on-one bilateral meetings for Trump, who has publicly stated he is working to finalize a new Iran nuclear agreement in the coming days. Trump is set to depart Washington D.C. on Sunday evening immediately after marking his 80th birthday with a primetime mixed martial arts event hosted on the White House South Lawn, and will arrive in France for the summit on Monday afternoon.

    Following the conclusion of the main G7 gathering in the scenic Alpine lakeside town of Evian-les-Bains, Macron will host Trump for a private dinner at Versailles, the opulent former royal residence just outside Paris that has long stood as a symbol of Franco-American diplomatic ties. According to the Élysée Palace, the dinner will also commemorate the 240th anniversary of U.S. independence, an occasion chosen to highlight the deep historical friendship between the two nations.

    Versailles, which served as the official seat of the French monarchy from the reign of Louis XIV through Louis XVI, is a regular venue for state visits and meetings with visiting global leaders. In 2021, Macron welcomed Britain’s King Charles III and Queen Camilla to the palace for its 400th-anniversary celebrations, hosting a state dinner in the palace’s famous Hall of Mirrors, one of the most famous spaces among the sprawling estate’s 2,300 rooms. Prior to that, in 2017 shortly after his first election to the presidency, Macron welcomed Russian President Vladimir Putin to Versailles, a meeting that took place before relations between Paris and Moscow collapsed entirely following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

    Beyond his scheduled meeting with Macron, Trump is also set to hold separate bilateral talks with the leaders of Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and India. All four nations have been invited to participate in this year’s summit as guest countries at Macron’s request.

    The 2025 G7 summit, which brings together leaders from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan, will cover a wide range of pressing global policy topics. Officials confirm the agenda includes discussions on sustainable global economic growth, securing resilient supply chains for critical minerals needed for the energy transition, addressing irregular cross-border migration, and establishing global guardrails for artificial intelligence development.

    Two ongoing conflicts are expected to dominate much of the off-agenda and bilateral conversation: the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and escalating tensions around Iran. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is confirmed to attend the summit to meet with G7 leaders, but administration officials noted that no formal bilateral meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy has been added to the U.S. president’s official schedule as of Saturday. The pair could still hold an informal meeting on the summit sidelines, officials added.

    The report was compiled from contributions by AP correspondent Petrequin, reporting from London, and fellow AP writer Aamer Madhani.

  • Canada’s Carney says middle-power countries shouldn’t compete for favor with the US

    Canada’s Carney says middle-power countries shouldn’t compete for favor with the US

    Ahead of the upcoming Group of Seven summit kicking off Monday in France, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has ramped up his diplomatic push to realign Canada’s global partnerships away from the United States and toward deeper integration with Europe, making his case for collective middle-power action during a visit to Dublin this weekend.

    Carney’s European tour began with a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday, followed by talks Saturday with Ireland’s Taoiseach Micheál Martin. During a remarks delivered at Dublin’s Trinity College, the Canadian leader laid out a clear alternative path for nations caught in an era of intensifying great power rivalry. Instead of smaller and middle-sized countries competing to win favor from major global powers, Carney argues that uniting with like-minded allies can multiply collective strength to create an independent, influential third way.

    “ In a world of great power rivalry, middle powers have a choice — to compete for favor or to combine to create a third path with impact,” Carney told the audience. This framing builds on comments he made earlier this year at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he made global headlines by declaring the traditional post-Cold War rules-based global order defunct and condemned coercive pressure exerted by great powers on smaller sovereign states.

    Carney highlighted the combined scale of Canada and the European Union to back his case for closer cooperation: together, the two blocs hold a combined population more than double that of the United States, a combined GDP matching that of the U.S., and a collective defense budget twice the size of China’s. He framed the Canada-EU partnership as a values-driven force for global good, rooted in shared commitments to human rights, individual dignity, and pluralism.

    “The new world order will be built starting with Europe,” Carney stated during a joint press conference with Martin ahead of his Trinity College address. “Canada is the most European of non-European countries. We are transforming our cooperation with Europe.”

    This shift toward Europe is already well underway, Carney noted. Just five months ago, Canada became the first non-European country granted membership in the EU’s SAFE defense procurement initiative. In the 15 months since Carney took office as prime minister, this trip marks his ninth visit to the continent, and Canada has already secured 56 critical minerals partnerships across more than 10 European nations. Carney has also set a formal national target to double Canada’s non-U.S. exports over the next decade, a goal shaped by ongoing trade friction with Washington under the second Trump administration.

    Ireland, which is set to take over the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union starting in July, has fully embraced Canada’s ambition. “Prime Minister Carney has spoken with great clarity and conviction about Canada’s desire to deepen its engagement with Europe. Ireland warmly and unreservedly welcomes that ambition, and we will do what we can to strengthen relations between the European union and Canada during our forthcoming presidency,” Martin confirmed.

    Even as Canada leans into closer European ties, trade tensions with the U.S. remain a lingering issue, with the upcoming July 1 mandatory review of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) looming on the horizon. The USMCA, the latest iteration of a North American free trade framework that has linked the three regional economies since the 1990s, has been the subject of conflicting signals from Trump, who said this week he may choose not to renew the pact.

    Carney pushed back against fears of a full collapse of the regional trade arrangement, noting that the Trump administration has made clear it has no interest in rewriting the core structure of the agreement. Changing the agreement fundamentally would require congressional approval, a step Carney said the White House has no intention of taking. He added that roughly 85% of Canadian exports to the U.S. already enter tariff-free under the current USMCA framework, a status the administration has chosen to maintain.

    A senior anonymous U.S. administration official confirmed that no bilateral meeting between Trump and Carney is scheduled for the G7 summit, and that no major trade breakthroughs are expected during the gathering. The official did note that the White House has viewed Canada’s recent reversal of a regulation requiring foreign streaming platforms to invest a share of their Canadian revenue into local content and news as a positive step, and that Washington has received outreach from Ottawa for further trade discussions.

    Carney acknowledged that Trump’s trade policies have created uncertainty for cross-border investment, a key factor driving Canada’s push to diversify its economic and geopolitical partnerships. The new alignment with Europe, he argues, will strengthen both blocs at a time of shifting global power dynamics.

  • Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney begins two-day visit to Ireland

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney begins two-day visit to Ireland

    Eight years after former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s last official bilateral trip to the Republic of Ireland, current Prime Minister Mark Carney has touched down in Dublin for a landmark two-day visit that aims to deepen political, economic and people-to-people ties between the two North Atlantic nations.

    Carney and his wife Diana Fox Carney arrived at Dublin Airport shortly after 10 a.m. local time on Saturday, where they were formally welcomed by Irish Taoiseach Micheál Martin. Gardaí, Ireland’s national police service, has noted that any traffic disruptions tied to the visit will be confined to small local areas and kept minimal, though temporary rolling road closures will be implemented across Saturday to accommodate the visit’s itinerary and required security escorts.

    At a joint press briefing held at Dublin’s Government Buildings following their opening meeting, Martin extended a warm, nationwide welcome to the Canadian leader, noting his deep Irish roots. “I know I speak for the people of Mayo, and indeed for the Irish people more broadly, when I say that we are deeply honoured to welcome him back,” Martin said, framing the visit as a unique chance to celebrate and reinforce the longstanding bond between Ireland and Canada.

    Responding to the welcome, Carney expressed gratitude for the hospitality, calling the trip a personal and professional milestone. “It is a true pleasure to return to Dublin, and an honour to be the first Canadian prime minister in a decade to be making an official visit here,” he said.

    Beyond ceremonial welcomes, the core policy focus of the visit is the adoption of a new framework for strategic and economic partnership between the two countries. The Irish government confirmed the agreement will expand collaboration across a range of high-priority sectors, including bilateral trade and investment, life sciences, academic research and innovation, and security and defense cooperation.

    Economic data released ahead of the meeting shows that bilateral ties have already expanded dramatically in recent years. Total two-way trade in goods and services between Ireland and Canada jumped from €3.2 billion (£2.76 billion) in 2016 to more than €12 billion (£10.35 billion) in 2024. Canadian direct investment in Ireland has grown 131% over the same period, and Ireland currently ranks as Canada’s eighth-largest foreign investor globally.

    On Saturday evening, Carney will be the guest of honor at an official dinner hosted at Dublin’s historic Dublin Castle, before traveling to Trinity College Dublin on Sunday to deliver a public address. The visit also carries deep personal meaning for Carney, who traces his heritage to Ireland. On the second day of the trip, he will travel west to County Mayo, to visit Aghagower, the small village where his paternal grandparents lived before emigrating to Canada more than a century ago.

    While in Aghagower, Carney will attend Mass at the local parish church and tour the nearby village cemetery, where multiple generations of his ancestors are buried. He also has a second set of grandparents with roots in County Cavan. After his visit to the ancestral village, Carney will travel to nearby Westport to meet with Irish President Catherine Connolly to wrap up his official trip.

  • Switzerland to vote on plan to cap population at 10 million

    Switzerland to vote on plan to cap population at 10 million

    This Sunday, Swiss voters will head to the ballot box to decide on one of the most divisive policy proposals in the Alpine nation’s recent history: a nationwide initiative to cap the country’s total population at 10 million by 2050, a vote that has laid bare deep national rifts over immigration, economic stability and Switzerland’s relationship with the European Union.

    The proposal, branded the “sustainability initiative” by its backer, the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP), frames population caps as a solution to growing public strains. The country’s population has surged from 7.3 million in 2002 to 9.1 million today, with 27% of current residents born abroad. SVP supporters argue that unregulated immigration has directly driven a national housing shortage, overcrowded transit networks, overburdened public schools, and strained social and health services. Limiting population growth, they claim, will preserve Switzerland’s unique quality of life for current and future generations.

    Opponents from across the political spectrum, including the Swiss federal government, business associations, trade unions, and left-leaning parties, have dismissed the plan as a dangerous “chaos initiative” that threatens Switzerland’s economic prosperity and global standing. Under the proposal, once the population hits 9.5 million, the government would be required to implement strict restrictions, including cutting asylum acceptances and ending family reunification rights for foreign workers. If the 10 million cap is reached, Switzerland would be forced to withdraw from existing international agreements, most notably the EU’s free movement of people accord.

    For business leaders, that prospect carries severe risks. Switzerland’s economy, particularly its critical hospitality and healthcare sectors, relies heavily on immigrant labor: half of all hotel workers in the country are foreign-born, and hospitals and care facilities depend on overseas staff to address persistent labor gaps. Economiesuisse, Switzerland’s leading business association, warns that ending free movement of people would jeopardize Switzerland’s access to the EU single market — its largest trading partner by far. EU officials have repeatedly made clear that non-member states cannot cherry-pick single market benefits while rejecting core commitments like free movement, raising the specter of trade barriers and economic disruption.

    Demographic experts and opponents also argue the plan ignores Switzerland’s pressing aging population crisis: roughly 20% of Swiss residents are currently over 65, and the country requires a steady inflow of young working immigrants to fund pension systems and staff care services for the elderly.

    The referendum is made possible by Switzerland’s iconic direct democracy system, which allows any initiative to go to a national ballot if organizers collect 100,000 valid signatures. For many undecided voters, the core question remains how exactly a hard population cap — a policy never attempted by any other modern nation, outside of China’s now-discarded one-child policy aimed at slowing birth rates — would function in practice.

    Recent polling points to an extraordinarily tight race, with opponents holding a wafer-thin 52% to 45% lead, though pollsters note a large share of voters remain undecided. The national divide is illustrated by two young politicians from Bern, both from immigrant backgrounds, who hold diametrically opposed views on the initiative. Twenty-nine-year-old Nils Fiechter, an SVP member of the Bern cantonal parliament who holds dual Swiss-Canadian citizenship, argues unchecked immigration is eroding Switzerland’s national identity. “Unchecked immigration is leading to Switzerland no longer being Switzerland,” he says, framing the initiative as a push to protect the country’s prosperous, safe way of life for all residents, regardless of background.

    Thirty-one-year-old Helin Genis, a Social Democrat on the Bern city council whose parents immigrated from Turkey, calls the SVP’s arguments blatant scapegoating. “It is not migrants who determine rent levels. It is not migrants who raise health insurance premiums. Nor is it migrants who make political decisions on housing, infrastructure or social investment,” she explains. “Viewing problems through the lens of migration does not lead to solutions, but to division.” Genis argues the real policy challenge is expanding affordable housing and strengthening public services, not excluding new residents.

    As voting day approaches, fears of international isolation have become a central argument for the no campaign. Amid heightened global geopolitical uncertainty — from the war in Ukraine to ongoing trade tensions with the United States that have already left 15% punitive tariffs on Swiss goods unresolved — anti-initiative posters have adopted a striking visual to drive home their message: the posters feature U.S. President Donald Trump with the silhouettes of Russian leader Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping behind him, with the headline: “Break with Europe, at a time like this?”

    While SVP supporters dismiss warnings of EU retaliation as fearmongering, arguing existing trade agreements benefit the bloc as much as Switzerland, the threat of broken ties and international isolation could prove the deciding factor for swing voters. As the country heads to the polls, all sides agree the outcome of this unprecedented referendum will shape Switzerland’s demographic, economic and political trajectory for decades to come.