标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Industrial heritage inspires new creative outlooks

    Industrial heritage inspires new creative outlooks

    Beneath the first clear skies after weeks of unbroken spring rain, French-German artist Alexandre Dupeyron wandered through the weathered corridors and crumbling staircases of the long-shuttered Wumuchong coal mine in Ningxiang, Hunan province. With every step, clouds of fine dust, undisturbed for decades, rose from the broken debris scattered across the facility’s concrete floors.

    Stopping amid the remnants of the mine’s once-bustling operations, Dupeyron bent to pick up a small, dense lump of coal left behind when the mine closed. Not far from where he stood, the rusted frame of an old coal conveyor jutted toward the sky, its metal beams forming a skeletal, weathered monument to the site’s industrial past. In that quiet moment, that ordinary chunk of coal — its surface glinting faintly in the rare spring sunlight — transformed from a forgotten relic of heavy industry into the core raw material for a new body of art.

    Arriving at the Wumuchong site in early March 2026 for a month-long artist residency, the 43-year-old creator has centered his practice here on working with locally sourced crushed coal, blending hand-drawing and photography to create site-specific works. Inside his makeshift studio, set within one of the mine’s repurposed original buildings, Dupeyron grinds collected coal chunks and broken brick fragments from the site into fine powder, running the mixture through multiple rounds of filtering to refine it. Using a custom blending recipe he developed over years of experimental work, he turns this locally sourced material into natural pigments for his drawings, photographic pieces, and mixed-media works that draw directly from the mine’s own physical identity.

    Dupeyron explained that the connection between human activity and the natural world is a persistent throughline in all his creative work. As an artist who has spent his career focusing on shifting urban and post-industrial landscapes, he had long sought the opportunity to create work on location at a decommissioned industrial site. “This place is amazing,” he shared of the former mining hub, which has been reinvented as the Wumuchong Art Zone, a creative space that attracts artists from across China and around the world.

    Dupeyron’s residency is just one example of a growing trend across China: repurposing abandoned industrial heritage sites — from retired mines and shuttered factories to obsolete steel mills and disused warehouses — into dynamic public cultural spaces. What were once symbols of 20th-century industrial expansion have been reborn as art centers, public museums, community sports facilities, and creative hubs that draw visitors and creators alike, breathing new economic and cultural life into former industrial hubs while preserving the region’s industrial history for future generations.

  • 10 measures aim to advance cross-Strait ties

    10 measures aim to advance cross-Strait ties

    As a high-profile delegation led by Chinese Kuomintang Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun wrapped up its six-day visit to the Chinese mainland, the mainland on Sunday announced a comprehensive 10-measure policy package designed to advance peaceful cross-Strait relations and lift the well-being of residents on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. This announcement comes on the heels of a historic Friday meeting between Xi Jinping, General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, and Cheng — the first top-level dialogue between the two cross-Strait political parties in a decade.

    During the meeting, General Secretary Xi emphasized that the core goal of advancing cross-Strait relations is to deliver a higher quality of life for people on both sides. With the mainland kicking off its 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030), Xi extended an open invitation to Taiwan compatriots to share in the mainland’s development opportunities and progress, calling for joint efforts to strengthen the broader Chinese national economy. He also made clear that high-quality products from Taiwan, including agricultural and fishery goods, are welcome to gain greater access to consumer markets across the mainland.

    The 10 new initiatives, released by the Taiwan Work Office of the CPC Central Committee, span a wide range of key areas including party-to-party communication, youth exchanges, infrastructure connectivity, cross-Strait transportation, trade facilitation, and cultural cooperation. A centerpiece of the package is a proposal to explore the establishment of a regular communication mechanism between the CPC and the KMT, built on the shared foundation of upholding the 1992 Consensus and opposing “Taiwan independence”. The 1992 Consensus, which enshrines the one-China principle, was first reached in 1992 by the cross-Strait authorized bodies the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait and the Straits Exchange Foundation.

    Other key measures include expanding youth exchanges through long-term institutional programs and arranging annual cross-Strait delegation visits. The package prioritizes advancing utility interconnection and cross-connection bridge projects between Fujian Province and the Taiwan-controlled Jinmen and Matsu islands. It also lays out plans to promote the normalization of direct cross-Strait passenger air services and restore suspended routes connecting Taiwan with multiple mainland cities.

    To boost economic ties, the measures streamline approval and purchase processes for qualified Taiwan agricultural and fishery products, expand market access support for Taiwan-based businesses, and improve port and service conditions for Taiwan fishing vessels operating in cross-Strait waters. In the cultural and media sector, the mainland will open its market to more Taiwan-produced content, encourage collaborative media production projects, and support the innovative development of shared Chinese culture. Additionally, the package outlines steps to resume individual tour travel from Shanghai and Fujian residents to Taiwan; currently, only group tours are permitted for residents of these two regions, though individual travel to Jinmen and Matsu from Fujian resumed in the second half of 2024.

    KMT Vice Chairman Chang Jung-kung, a member of the visiting delegation, framed the 10-point package as a goodwill “gift” from the mainland delivered to the Taiwanese people through Cheng’s visit, noting that the measures directly advance Taiwanese public welfare. He highlighted that the package demonstrates the mainland’s sincere goodwill and delivers tangible, practical benefits to Taiwan.

    Cheng’s six-day trip, which ran from April 8 to April 13, marked the first visit to the mainland by a KMT chairperson in 10 years, and included stops in Jiangsu Province, Shanghai and Beijing. This year marks the 160th birth anniversary of Sun Yat-sen, the founding figure of the KMT, so the itinerary included traditional stops for KMT leaders: the delegation paid respects to Sun at his mausoleum in Nanjing and the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall at Biyun Temple in Beijing’s Xiangshan.

    Beyond traditional exchanges, the trip included multiple stops showcasing the mainland’s cutting-edge technological progress. On the final day of the tour, the delegation visited Xiaomi’s electric vehicle hyperfactory in Beijing, where members learned about the mainland’s breakthroughs in electric vehicle research and manufacturing. A day earlier, the group toured the Zhongguancun National Innovation Demonstration Zone Exhibition Center in Beijing, where they viewed the latest developments in artificial intelligence, embodied intelligence, and high-end medical devices.

    Speaking after the Zhongguancun visit, Cheng noted that Taiwan’s service sector and traditional manufacturing industries face growing headwinds, and said, “I found answers for Taiwan’s future here.” She expressed deep admiration for how the mainland has integrated AI and technological innovation across every economic sector, calling the trip “highly rewarding.” “Without political barriers across the Strait, the two sides could make significant contributions to humanity,” she said, calling for deeper cross-Strait cooperation that leverages the unique strengths of both sides. She added that collaborative work to narrow differences and reduce confrontation is ultimately aimed at delivering better lives for all people across the Strait.

    Li Peng, dean of the Taiwan Research Institute at Xiamen University, noted that Cheng’s visit reaffirms the shared commitment of both sides to pursue peaceful cross-Strait development, uphold the 1992 Consensus, oppose “Taiwan independence”, and work to improve public well-being on both sides. He pointed out that mainstream public opinion in Taiwan supports restarting and expanding people-to-people cross-Strait exchanges, with many Taiwan residents eager to access the benefits of the mainland’s robust development. “Cheng’s trip has achieved these core objectives,” Li said, adding that the new 10-measure package delivers tangible benefits to Taiwan compatriots and stands as a landmark, productive outcome of the visit.

  • Tributes pour in for legendary Indian singer Asha Bhosle

    Tributes pour in for legendary Indian singer Asha Bhosle

    One of India’s most celebrated and influential musical figures, legendary playback singer Asha Bhosle, has passed away at the age of 92 in Mumbai. She died on Sunday, days after being admitted to a local hospital for treatment following a sudden heart attack. Bhosle’s extraordinary 77-year career included thousands of recordings, two Grammy Award nominations, and a permanent place at the heart of Indian popular culture. Her final funeral rites will be held on Monday evening at Mumbai’s Shivaji Park, and the Indian government has granted full state honours to mark her legacy.

    Since news of her death broke on Sunday, an outpouring of grief and tribute has spread across India and the global music community, with public figures, fans, and fellow artists from every sector hailing Bhosle as one of the defining artistic voices of 20th and 21st century Indian cinema. By Sunday evening, crowds of respectful fans had begun gathering outside Bhosle’s Mumbai home to lay tributes and pay their final respects to the singer.

    India’s highest political leaders have been among the first to honour Bhosle’s memory. Prime Minister Narendra Modi called her “one of the most iconic and versatile voices India has ever known,” while President Draupadi Murmu described her passing as “an irreparable loss to music lovers” across the world. The widespread reach of her cross-generational influence is reflected in tributes from leading figures beyond the music industry, including global Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan and legendary Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar.

    Khan wrote in his tribute that Bhosle was “a talent that will outlive many,” adding that her “voice has been one of the pillars of Indian cinema and will continue to resonate world over for centuries to come.” Tendulkar, who counted Bhosle as a close personal friend and noted that she was a passionate lifelong cricket fan, said, “Asha Tai [Marathi for elder sister] was family, and through her eternal songs, she will remain timeless.” Bhosle’s connection to cricket was honoured publicly during an Indian Premier League match on Sunday, where the home team Mumbai Indians wore black armbands and held a minute’s silence in her memory before kickoff.

    Fellow artists from across the global music industry have also shared their condolences. Oscar-winning composer AR Rahman noted that “she lives forever through her voice and aura — what an artist.” Leading contemporary Indian singer Shreya Ghosal recalled growing up “listening to her, learning from her, and being in awe of her effortless versatility,” adding that Bhosle made “every note feel alive, every emotion feel personal.” Singer, actor and director Farhan Akhtar emphasized how foundational Bhosle’s work was to modern playback singing, saying it was “impossible to talk about playback singing without mentioning Asha Bhosle” and calling her voice, joy and energy “irreplaceable.”

    Bhosle’s cross-cultural appeal stretched far beyond South Asia. In 1997, her iconic status in global music inspired the British band Cornershop’s hit single Brimful of Asha. On Sunday, Tjinder Singh, the band’s frontperson, said that “few have reached the ability to be loved in so many languages and dialects, and even fewer have reached so many with the astonishment of heart that her songs gave us.” Most recently, in early 2026, Bhosle collaborated with British virtual band Gorillaz on their latest album *The Mountain*, a project exploring themes of grief and mortality. The track she featured on, *The Shadowy Light*, paired her distinct vocals with international musicians to reflect on death and the afterlife.

    Born in 1933 into a family of working musicians, Bhosle began performing as a child alongside her elder sister, the equally legendary Lata Mangeshkar, after the death of their father when she was still young. Her early life was marked by significant personal challenges: she entered her first marriage at just 16, a union that ultimately ended in separation. For much of her career, she was frequently compared to her older sister, who was revered as the “nightingale of Bollywood” and passed away in 2022. But Bhosle carved out a uniquely distinct artistic identity for herself: while Mangeshkar became best known for poignant, melodic devotional and romantic tracks, Bhosle rose to fame for her bold, dynamic interpretations of jazzy, cabaret-style and upbeat pop numbers through the early and middle stages of her career.

    Bhosle’s professional breakthrough came in the 1950s, during her prolific collaboration with iconic composer OP Nayyar, a partnership that marked a permanent turning point in her career and cemented her status as a leading playback singer. Later in her career, she worked closely with composer RD Burman, who she would go on to marry; the pair collaborated for 14 years until Burman’s death in 1994, and their creative partnership allowed Bhosle to expand her vocal range and experiment with new genres and styles. Even into her 90s, she continued to record and push creative boundaries, collaborating on cross-cultural projects long after most artists retired.

    Beyond her decades-long musical career, Bhosle was known for her love of cooking, and turned that passion into a successful business venture. She was the founder of the popular restaurant chain “Asha’s”, which operates locations across Dubai and the United Kingdom. Veteran Indian lyricist Javed Akhtar recalled on Sunday that Bhosle often cooked homemade kebabs for him when he visited, and took great joy in receiving praise for her culinary work.

    As the Indian nation and the global music community mourn her passing, tributes continue to flow in highlighting the lasting impact of Bhosle’s trailblazing career. Her ability to adapt across decades, move seamlessly between every musical genre from romantic ballads to high-energy dance tracks, and connect with audiences across generations and geographies has left an irreplaceable mark on global popular culture.

  • Iran war’s global energy crisis sharpens China’s advantage in clean tech

    Iran war’s global energy crisis sharpens China’s advantage in clean tech

    The ongoing conflict in Iran has upended global energy markets, with widespread disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz — the chokepoint through which most of the world’s traded oil and natural gas flows. With the strait mostly shut and most of its pre-conflict cargo bound for Asian markets, regional governments are racing to conserve existing supplies and rebuild depleted energy reserves, even as a fragile temporary ceasefire struggles to hold. Soaring gasoline prices have already hit consumers across the United States and Europe, and the crisis has laid bare the deep geopolitical and economic risks of global dependence on fossil fuels. For most energy-importing Asian nations, the shock has delivered severe economic pain. But against this backdrop, analysts and industry experts predict China, the world’s largest buyer of Iranian crude oil, is uniquely positioned to turn the global energy disruption into a major strategic and economic gain.

    Decades of targeted investment have left China as the unrivaled global leader in the clean energy technologies the world is now scrambling to adopt. China controls more than 70% of global electric vehicle (EV) manufacturing capacity and roughly 85% of global lithium-ion battery cell production, according to data from the International Energy Agency. Its domestic industry giants, including EV manufacturer BYD and battery producer CATL, already dominate global export markets for these products, and years of policy prioritization have cemented this lead: China’s current five-year development plan running through 2030 reaffirms clean technology as a core national strategic priority.

    This position is the result of a deliberate policy shift dating back more than a decade, when Chinese President Xi Jinping integrated long-term energy security into the country’s broader national security framework. While fossil fuels still make up the majority of China’s domestic energy mix, consistent government support has allowed its clean energy sector to outpace development in most other major economies, particularly the United States.

    Under the second Donald Trump administration, U.S. energy policy has doubled down on fossil fuel development, leaning on the country’s vast domestic oil and gas reserves to pursue what Trump has called “energy dominance,” centered on the slogan “drill, baby, drill.” Washington has prioritized expanding exports of liquefied natural gas while scaling back federal support for renewable energy development. Even before the Iran conflict broke out in late February, this created what analysts call a “bifurcation” in global energy markets, with the world’s two superpowers pushing competing visions for the future of energy and leaving other nations to navigate complicated choices about which path to pursue.

    Now, the energy shock from the Iran war is tilting that balance sharply in China’s favor. Global demand for affordable clean energy technology has spiked as governments, businesses and households wake up to the fragility of global fossil fuel supply chains. Data from London-based energy think tank Ember shows Chinese exports of solar panels, batteries and electric vehicles hit a record high of nearly $22.3 billion in December 2025, a 47% year-over-year increase, with most shipments bound for Southeast Asia and Europe. Credit rating firm Fitch Ratings projects investment in renewable power and battery storage will surge across energy import-dependent nations, particularly in Western Europe, as countries look to insulate themselves from future fossil fuel price shocks.

    Financial markets have already priced in this expected growth: in March 2026, shares of CATL and BYD traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange rose roughly 24% and 11% respectively, as investors bet on rising global demand for Chinese clean energy products.

    China’s EV sector was already outpacing U.S. and European rivals before the conflict, with aggressive expansion of production capacity and affordable pricing helping Chinese brands gain significant market share across emerging markets in Southeast Asia and beyond. Analysts say that growth will only accelerate in the wake of the energy crisis. “The energy shock is going to help the Chinese industry globally and hurt the American car industry globally,” said Amy Myers Jaffe, senior fellow at New York University’s Center for Global Affairs. While high U.S. tariffs have largely blocked Chinese EVs from the American market, surging domestic fuel prices are expected to further boost BYD’s sales growth within China’s own large EV market, according to Chris Liu, an analyst at research and advisory firm Omdia.

    Early data from around the world already shows a sharp shift in consumer and government behavior in response to rising fuel costs. In Pakistan, which previously relied on the Strait of Hormuz for 80% of its oil imports, decades of gradual renewable expansion has already softened the blow of the current crisis. By December 2025, Pakistan had imported more than 50 gigawatts of Chinese solar panels as part of its national renewable rollout. Analysts from Renewables First and the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air estimate that if current fuel prices remain high, existing solar capacity will save Pakistan $6.3 billion in fossil fuel import costs over the next year. “The shock isn’t as big as it would have been without solar,” said Nabiya Imran of Renewables First.

    In the United Kingdom, British renewable energy group Octopus Energy reported that EV leasing demand jumped more than a third in the first three weeks of March 2026 compared to the pre-conflict period in February, alongside sharp increases in sales of rooftop solar systems and customer inquiries about solar energy. Even in Southeast Asia, where regional EV maker VinFast has moved to offer discounts to offset rising fuel prices, the crisis has reinforced interest in transitioning away from gasoline-powered vehicles. While analysts note it will take time for long-term purchasing trends to shift, as consumers wait to see how the Iran conflict evolves, the prolonged price shock is expected to act as a lasting catalyst for EV adoption.

    Even Indonesia, the world’s largest coal exporter, is accelerating its transition to electric transportation, a shift that stands to benefit Chinese clean energy firms. In March 2026, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto announced a major national push into EV production and charging infrastructure development. Chinese firms already hold a dominant position in Indonesia’s clean energy supply chain: they signed more than $54 billion in deals with Indonesia’s state utility in 2023, and added a further $10 billion pledge during Prabowo’s 2024 visit to Beijing. “There will be direct financial benefits to Chinese companies,” said Sam Reynolds, energy analyst at the U.S.-based Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA).

    Experts say the conflict has fundamentally vindicated China’s long-term approach to energy policy and geopolitics. “China’s approach to energy sector development and geopolitics has been completely validated by the Iran conflict,” Reynolds noted. Li Shuo, director of the Asia Society Policy Institute’s China Climate Hub, added: “They are at the very forefront of this, more so than any other countries in the world, certainly more so than the United States.”

    This reporting was contributed by Ghosal in Hanoi, Vietnam, Delgado in Bangkok, and AP Business Writer Paul Wiseman. The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations, with the AP retaining full editorial control over all content.

  • Already under financial pressure, Midwest soybean farmers are squeezed further by tariffs, Iran war

    Already under financial pressure, Midwest soybean farmers are squeezed further by tariffs, Iran war

    As 60-year-old fifth-generation farmer Doug Bartek stepped into a Nebraska grain bin this spring, shoveling soybeans toward a conveyor amid gusty plains winds, the weight of mounting industry stress was far heavier than any load of grain. For Bartek, who chairs the Nebraska Soybean Association and runs a 2,000-acre operation near Wahoo where three-quarters of the land is rented, this planting season has brought a tangled web of crises that have left many American soybean producers trapped between skyrocketing input costs and stagnant, depressed crop prices.

    Bartek’s anxiety is far from unique. Across the U.S. Midwest, which produces the bulk of the nation’s soybean crop, thousands of commercial grain farmers are grappling with overlapping economic pressures that have pushed many toward negative margins, cash flow crunches, and even the risk of bankruptcy. What began as a gradual trend of rising costs and oversupplied global markets has been compounded in recent months by trade policy fallout and geopolitical conflict in the Middle East, creating a perfect storm for an industry that forms the backbone of American agriculture.

    Soybeans have grown from a minor crop to one of the United States’ most valuable agricultural exports over the past 60 years. Driven by rising international demand, particularly from China, production exploded in the 1990s, and today soybeans and corn are the two dominant row crops across U.S. farm country. But even before recent geopolitical and trade disruptions, farmers faced systemic financial headwinds. Global soybean production has consistently hit new record highs in recent years, largely fueled by expanded output from Brazil, which overtook the U.S. as the world’s top soybean producer years ago. The resulting global supply glut has kept soybean prices stubbornly low for nearly a decade.

    At the same time, every major cost associated with farming has climbed steadily, and in many cases sharply. U.S. Department of Agriculture data shows overall farm production expenses, including seed, pesticides, equipment, and land, have trended upward for decades, with soybean operating costs remaining elevated since 2020 and projected to rise again by 2026. For many Midwest farmers who rent at least part of their land — a common arrangement across the region — rising rental rates have added an extra layer of strain. Bartek notes that many absentee landowners, unfamiliar with the struggles of on-the-ground farming, are hiking rents to cover their own rising property taxes, passing that cost directly onto producers.

    Paul Mitchell, a professor of agricultural and applied economics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, says the combination of low commodity prices and bloated input costs has left many farmers in a critical liquidity crunch. Long-term industry consolidation has amplified this pressure: the number of U.S. farms has shrunk for decades, as larger, more capital-intensive operations have absorbed smaller struggling farms. Today’s modern commercial farm requires far more financial reserves than it did a generation ago, leaving producers far more vulnerable to sudden market and cost shifts.

    Market forces are not the only drag on farmer profits. In 2025, sweeping tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on Chinese goods triggered a full-scale trade war, with Beijing responding by placing retaliatory tariffs on U.S. soybeans — China was the top global buyer of American soybeans at the time, representing a critical export market for Midwest producers. The result was an immediate collapse in soybean prices that left farmers who needed to sell to cover operating costs and mortgage payments facing devastating losses.

    While the two nations reached a trade deal later that year, with China committing to large annual soybean purchases and the Trump administration rolling out a $12 billion emergency aid package for affected farmers, industry experts and producers agree the damage was lasting. Even with federal aid, the American Soybean Association estimates farmers still lost nearly $75 per harvested acre of soybeans from the 2025 crop. More importantly, the trade war pushed China to permanently shift its purchasing toward competing suppliers, primarily Brazil, accelerating the long-term decline of U.S. soybean market share in China. Today, U.S. soybean exports remain 15% to 20% below pre-trade war levels, a gap that has never been filled by other global markets, according to Iowa State University agricultural economist Chad Hart.
    “We’re not nearly as dominant in the world export market as we used to be,” explained Joseph Glauber, former chief economist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Global competitors have reaped permanent benefits from the trade shift caused by the dispute, he added.

    The most recent shock to hit soybean farmers came from the February 2026 Iran conflict, after joint U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran triggered a near-total shutdown of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global chokepoint for energy and commodity trade. The shutdown sent global oil prices soaring, pushing up the cost of gasoline and diesel that farmers rely on for planting, harvesting, and transporting crops. More critically, the disruption cut off access to key fertilizer exports from the Persian Gulf: roughly half of the world’s traded urea, a widely used nitrogen fertilizer, comes from the Middle East, which is a top supplier of U.S. fertilizer imports.
    While soybeans do not require nitrogen fertilizer, nearly all U.S. soybean farmers also grow corn, which depends heavily on nitrogen inputs. The result was an immediate, dramatic spike in fertilizer prices that has not fully abated.
    A two-week ceasefire was reached in early April that called for reopening the Strait of Hormuz, but ongoing tensions over related conflicts have kept shipping slow, and fertilizer prices remain far higher than pre-conflict levels. While many farmers locked in fertilizer prices last fall by purchasing ahead of planting season, producers short on cash last year are now facing unmanageable input costs, according to Dave Walton, an Iowa farmer and vice president of the American Soybean Association. The conflict also damaged critical energy and chemical export facilities in the Middle East, and supply chain disruptions for crop chemical inputs will persist long after the ceasefire, according to Seth Goldstein, senior equity analyst at investment research firm Morningstar.
    For many corn and soybean farmers like Chris Gould of Maple Park, Illinois, the cumulative effect of higher fuel and fertilizer costs makes a negative return nearly inevitable this growing season. “It’s hard to say if I’m gonna come out ahead or behind on this whole deal,” Gould said. “But I suspect I’m going to come out behind.”

    The cumulative strain of these overlapping crises is already showing up in national farm health metrics. While still relatively low by historical standards, farm bankruptcies continued to climb in 2025, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation. A late March survey of 400 U.S. farmers conducted by Purdue University’s Center for Commercial Agriculture found that nearly half of respondents reported their operations were in worse financial shape than one year prior. Goldstein warns that if input costs continue to outpace crop price growth, the U.S. will see more bankruptcies in coming months.

    For Bartek, who has farmed Nebraska soil for 43 years, the thrill of spring planting remains — but the uncertainty about the future has never been heavier. He has watched neighbors lose their farms to bankruptcy or forced retirement auctions, and even heard of farmers dying by suicide amid unmanageable financial stress. Today, he questions whether he made the right choice in helping his son purchase his own farm just a few years ago. Like many of his peers across the Midwest, Bartek compares modern commercial farming to a high-stakes gamble, where producers bet millions of dollars on an unpredictable growing season, with increasingly little guarantee of a return that will cover their costs.

  • Five emerging themes for the Indo-Pacific from Trump’s Iran war

    Five emerging themes for the Indo-Pacific from Trump’s Iran war

    The phrase “this is not our war” has become a major source of friction within the Trump White House, after dozens of European leaders invoked it to explain their refusal to deploy military forces alongside the U.S. and Israel in their ongoing attacks on Iran. This public rift has thrown the future of the post-WWII transatlantic alliance into renewed uncertainty, even as the ripple effects of the Iran conflict extend far beyond the Middle East to reshape global security and economic assumptions. While the war itself remains unresolved, following the breakdown of April 11 negotiations hosted in Islamabad, early trends indicate that five major long-term global shifts are already taking shape, affecting every region from the Indo-Pacific to the Persian Gulf.

    Financial markets have so far reacted with muted volatility to the conflict, as investors hold out hope for a rapid end to hostilities. This bet aligns with the reality that the dramatic disruptions of open war can fade as quickly as they emerge once active combat ceases. Still, analysts have identified clear emerging themes that will outlast any near-term ceasefire, starting with the greatest long-term risk: accelerated nuclear proliferation across the globe.

    North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has openly argued that his country’s decades-long investment in nuclear weapons, begun by his father and grandfather, has insulated Pyongyang from the same type of attack Iran is now facing. Many experts agree that this example is not lost on Iran’s ruling regime, which is now widely believed to regret moving more slowly toward a nuclear weapons program. While some observers argue the war could deter proliferation by highlighting the risk of American intervention for nuclear aspirants, this logic falls apart for states that can leverage great power protection, like North Korea’s close relationship with China that makes a large-scale U.S. attack too risky to contemplate.

    In the Indo-Pacific, this new calculus has already pushed Japanese officials into open, unprecedented discussions about abandoning the country’s long-held nuclear taboo. These talks stem from two overlapping fears: that South Korea and other regional states could move quickly to develop their own nuclear arsenals, and that the U.S.-promised “extended deterrence” nuclear umbrella can no longer be counted on to protect regional allies. That doubt around American deterrence forms the second major shift laid bare by the Iran conflict.

    The war has put U.S. military power on full display, but it has also revealed alarming vulnerabilities. In a conflict against an already heavily weakened Iran, which had sustained significant damage from Israeli and American strikes in June of last year, the U.S. military rapidly depleted a large share of its stockpiles of advanced precision weapons and cutting-edge missile defense systems. This has raised urgent questions across the Indo-Pacific: if the U.S. can exhaust its stockpiles in weeks of fighting a weaker adversary, how would it fare in a prolonged conflict against a far stronger peer competitor like China?

    Compounding these concerns is the fact that the Iran war has forced the U.S. to reallocate critical military assets—including warships, entire Marine regiments, and layered missile defense systems—from the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East. While the immediate capability gaps created by this shift are not the primary worry, regional strategists cannot discount the risk that China or North Korea could choose to exploit this opening, even if the probability remains low. The far bigger concern is that despite an annual defense budget approaching $1 trillion, the U.S. military has already become severely overstretched after just a short conflict in Iran. This confirms long-held warnings about U.S. defense production capacity constraints, and suggests that current spending prioritizes fixed overhead costs like global basing over the flexible assets and stockpiles needed for modern conflict.

    The third key takeaway from the war is a global reevaluation of air and missile defense doctrine. The Gulf monarchies—the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia—have faced repeated barrages of Iranian missiles and drones, and their existing defense systems have failed to stop these attacks effectively. Part of this failure stems from the global shortage of advanced, costly interceptors for U.S.-made Patriot and THAAD systems, a supply crunch that was first exposed by the war in Ukraine. Another factor is that most countries had not adapted their defense strategies to counter the swarms of low-cost drones that have become a staple of modern warfare, until the Iran conflict forced a reckoning. As a result, demand for the type of low-cost, mass-deployed anti-drone defenses Ukraine has honed is set to surge across the globe, not just in the Middle East.

    Fourth, the conflict has underscored the urgent need for diversified energy supply chains and expanded strategic stockpiles of critical commodities. For years, analysts have warned that global trade chokepoints could become tools of leverage during open conflict, but the U.S. largely downplayed or even ignored the strategic risk of the Strait of Hormuz, despite the fact that roughly 20% of the world’s annual oil supply passes through the narrow waterway shared by Iran and Oman. After the collapse of the Islamabad talks, the world now faces a high-stakes game of brinkmanship between Trump and Iran over control of the strait. Trump’s recent declaration that U.S. warships will blockade the strait to block Iran from levying transit tolls is a direct challenge to Tehran, a bold gambit that carries a major risk of reigniting full-scale hostilities.

    Beyond the immediate crisis, the Hormuz standoff makes clear that nations need to diversify trade routes and build up larger strategic reserves to reduce the leverage chokepoints can give to adversarial powers. For Taiwan, this lesson hits particularly close to home: the island’s still-small strategic energy and commodity stockpiles leave it extremely vulnerable to a potential Chinese blockade.

    The fifth and final emerging shift centers on the future of American global alliances. The Iran war has laid bare Trump’s extreme sensitivity to any perceived lack of support from U.S. allies, even as he spent much of the past year publicly insulting and alienating those same partners. Already, the rift over European refusal to join the war has increased the odds that Trump could withdraw the U.S. from NATO in a fit of pique. While the Indo-Pacific alliances have not yet faced the same existential risk, the conflict confirms that U.S. foreign policy is now heavily concentrated in the hands of a single individual: the president. Though Trump is scheduled to leave office in less than three years under current constitutional rules, he has already made dozens of deeply personal, unilateral decisions that will reshape global order in that time, and no country can insulate itself from the consequences of his actions.

    This article is an updated version of an original piece published by Mainichi, appearing in Bill Emmott’s Substack column Global View.

  • Trump announces closure of Hormuz Strait as Iran talks falter

    Trump announces closure of Hormuz Strait as Iran talks falter

    In a sudden Sunday announcement via his Truth Social platform, U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered an immediate military blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a move that comes after Vice President JD Vance’s negotiation team failed to secure the trust of Iranian officials amid already heightened tensions between the two nations. Iranian negotiators, who have a long history of broken agreements with the United States, have refused to compromise on their sovereignty over the country’s nuclear program, derailing the first direct high-level talks between Washington and Tehran since 1979.

    Trump’s early morning post framed the closure as a response to what he called “world extortion” by Iran, claiming the country has leveraged unconfirmed claims of hidden mines in the strategic waterway to extract illegal tolls from commercial shipping. Prior to the Trump administration’s launch of the latest conflict, the strait — which carries roughly 20% of global oil trade — remained open to all vessels. “At some point, we will reach an ‘ALL BEING ALLOWED TO GO IN, ALL BEING ALLOWED TO GO OUT’ basis, but Iran has not allowed that to happen by merely saying, ‘There may be a mine out there somewhere,’ that nobody knows about but them,” Trump wrote. “THIS IS WORLD EXTORTION, and Leaders of Countries, especially the United States of America, will never be extorted.”

    The U.S. president went on to outline the parameters of the new blockade, stating he has instructed the U.S. Navy to interdict any vessel in international waters that has paid the so-called toll to Iran — a provision that was reportedly part of a draft ceasefire agreement Trump approved just last week. “No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas. We will also begin destroying the mines the Iranians laid in the Straits. Any Iranian who fires at us, or at peaceful vessels, will be BLOWN TO HELL!” he added. Trump doubled down on his hardline stance, warning that Iran will not be permitted to profit from what he calls illegal extortion, and reiterated that the U.S. military is “locked and loaded” to complete the destruction of remaining Iranian military infrastructure if necessary, citing Iran’s pursuit of nuclear capabilities as a core casus belli.

    The announcement sparked immediate pushback from peace advocates, policy experts, and Iran-focused analysts across the political spectrum. Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the anti-war organization CodePink, highlighted the contradictory logic of Trump’s policy in a post on X, writing, “So get this. Trump wants to open the Strait of Hormuz by closing the Strait of Hormuz. Blow up the world economy to punish Iran. Make sense?” Ryan Costello, policy director for the National Iranian American Council, went further, noting that a blockade qualifies as an act of war under international law. “Trump is announcing he will reenter the US into a war has been illegal under domestic and international law and has been disastrous for US interests, regional security, and the people of Iran,” Costello added. Independent journalist Séamus Malekafzali called the policy one of the most reckless in modern U.S. history, saying “I have legitimately never heard of a more insane, designed-to-backfire policy under this administration; maybe ever. Not only attempting to blockade Iranian ships, but ANY ship that goes through the Strait of Hormuz by paying the toll.”

    While Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio attended a high-profile Ultimate Fighting Championship event in Miami, Vance led the collapsed talks with Iranian officials in Islamabad, Pakistan. Speaking to reporters after the negotiations concluded, Vance reaffirmed the White House’s core demand: “We need to see an affirmative commitment that [Iran] will not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon. That is the core goal of the president of the United States, and that’s what we’ve tried to achieve through these negotiations.”

    Contextualizing the collapse of trust, Iranian officials note that Tehran was open to sweeping nuclear concessions before the U.S. and Israel launched a joint bombing campaign against Iran on February 28. Notably, every U.S. administration former President George W. Bush’s term — including Trump’s first term — has concluded that Iran is not actively pursuing a nuclear weapons program. Iran previously committed to permanent non-proliferation under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the landmark nuclear deal brokered during the Barack Obama administration. Trump unilaterally withdrew from the agreement in 2018 during his first term, despite widespread confirmation that Iran was in full compliance with its terms.

    Iranian Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf publicly blamed the U.S. for the failed talks, confirming that Iranian negotiators refused to trust Vance’s team despite Tehran putting forward new, forward-looking proposals. The Iranian negotiating delegation was named “Minaab 168” in honor of 168 children and school staff killed in a U.S. cruise missile strike on the town of Minaab on the first day of the current war. “Before the negotiations, I emphasized that we have the necessary good faith and will, but due to the experiences of the two previous wars we have no trust in the opposing side,” Ghalibaf explained on X. He added that “America has understood our logic and principles, and now it’s time for it to decide whether it can earn our trust or not.”

    This is not the first time talks have collapsed amid accusations of bad faith from Tehran: just hours before Trump ordered the start of bombing in February, Omani mediators — who have facilitated backchannel talks between the two sides for years — announced a peace deal was within reach, leading Iranian officials to accuse Washington of walking away from a near-agreement to launch hostilities. Similar accusations arose when the U.S. and Israel launched offensive strikes against Iran in summer 2025, mid-way through an earlier round of nuclear negotiations.

    As of Trump’s blockade announcement, the U.S. and Israeli bombing campaign against Iran has entered its 43rd day. Coalition forces have struck more than 13,000 targets across Iran, assassinated dozens of senior political and military leaders — including former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — and killed more than 3,000 Iranians, hundreds of whom are women and children, according to Iranian medical officials. Concurrent Israeli bombing operations in Lebanon have killed hundreds of additional civilians, and the Israeli campaign in Gaza has killed and maimed over 250,000 Palestinians, leading to an ongoing genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice and an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from the International Criminal Court on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Trump has previously publicly vowed to bomb Iran “back to the Stone Ages” and “destroy Iranian civilization.”

    Despite major military losses, Iran retains strategic leverage in the conflict, a reality Trump has rejected in his public statements. “The Iranians don’t seem to realize they have no cards, other than a short term extortion of the World by using International Waterways,” Trump wrote on Truth Social as Vance departed for negotiations in Pakistan. “The only reason they are alive today is to negotiate!” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei struck a measured tone in response to the collapse, advising that breakthroughs do not come after a single round of talks. “Naturally, from the beginning we should not have expected to reach an agreement in a single session,” Baghaei said. “No one had such an expectation.”

  • Iran’s IRGC warns any wrong move by ‘enemy’ in Strait of Hormuz to have lethal consequences

    Iran’s IRGC warns any wrong move by ‘enemy’ in Strait of Hormuz to have lethal consequences

    Tensions have flared again in the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz just days after a fragile ceasefire between Iran and the United States went into effect, with Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy issuing a stark public warning that any miscalculated move by hostile forces in the waterway will be met with deadly consequences.

    The warning was published Saturday on the social media platform X, where the IRGC Navy also shared drone-collected surveillance footage purporting to show the full operational landscape of the strait. The branch emphasized that every movement—whether active or stationary—of foreign vessels within the strategic waterway is under constant, full surveillance by Iran’s armed forces. “Any erroneous maneuver will trap the enemy in deadly whirlpools in the strait,” the post read.

    The escalation of rhetoric follows conflicting accounts of a U.S. naval operation in the region one day prior. U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced Saturday that two American warships had completed a transit through the Strait of Hormuz and launched mine-clearing operations in the Persian Gulf. Iran’s top military body, Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, immediately pushed back against the claim, issuing a strong denial that any American vessels had entered the strait’s territorial waters.

    In an exclusive Sunday report, Iran’s state-owned Press TV framed the U.S. military’s attempted deployment of the two destroyers—identified as the USS Michael Murphy and USS Frank E. Peterson—as a botched propaganda exercise timed to coincide with newly resumed Tehran-Washington negotiations in Islamabad. Press TV reported that Iranian naval forces forced the two American destroyers to retreat before they could reach the strait.

    Expanding on its stance Sunday, the IRGC released an official statement clarifying that any foreign military vessel seeking to approach the Strait of Hormuz under any pretext will be classified as a violation of the ongoing ceasefire and will face harsh, decisive retaliation.

    The current standoff comes against a backdrop of sharply escalated regional conflict that began in late February 2026, when Israel and the United States launched joint airstrikes targeting Tehran and multiple other Iranian cities. The strikes killed Iran’s then-Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, alongside a number of senior Iranian military commanders and civilian bystanders. In response, Iran launched a massive retaliatory campaign of missile and drone attacks targeting both Israel and U.S. military assets across the Middle East, and moved to tighten its control over the Strait of Hormuz by banning passage for all vessels owned or affiliated with Israel and the United States.

    A two-week ceasefire between Iran and the United States entered into force on Wednesday, paving the way for extended bilateral negotiations between the two delegations in the Pakistani capital. As of Sunday, those talks had not resulted in any breakthrough agreement, leaving the fragile truce at growing risk of collapse amid the latest naval dispute.

  • Political turmoil in Indian border state as nine million lose voting rights

    Political turmoil in Indian border state as nine million lose voting rights

    Ahead of high-stakes state assembly elections scheduled for late April in India’s eastern state of West Bengal, a massive voter roll cleanup initiative has plunged the state into political chaos, triggering accusations of disenfranchisement, partisan bias, and a threat to India’s democratic foundations.

    The dispute centers on the Election Commission of India’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR), a nationwide drive launched to purge duplicate, outdated, or ineligible entries from electoral registers. While 13 other Indian states and union territories have completed the SIR process, West Bengal is the only region required to add an extra layer of adjudication for challenged deletions. To date, the exercise has removed roughly 9 million names – 12% of the state’s total 76 million electorate – from the 2026 voter rolls. Of those deletions, more than 6 million have been categorized as absentee or deceased voters, leaving 2.7 million eligible-looking voters in limbo, their voting fate pending tribunal review.

    One of those caught in the bureaucratic and political crossfire is 65-year-old Muhammad Daud Ali, a retired Indian Army technician from West Bengal. Despite holding official Indian documentation including a valid passport and military service records, Ali and all three of his children were struck from the rolls, leaving only his wife registered to vote. Ali is far from alone: with polls set to open on April 23 and 29, thousands of voters in similar limbo see virtually no path to restoring their voting rights before ballots are cast. “I am dumbstruck. I feel deeply hurt and insulted,” Ali told reporters. “How can they conduct the elections without solving our disputes? I simply have no idea who to seek justice from.”

    The controversy has deepened along partisan and religious lines, pitting the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC), led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, against the national Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and India’s national Election Commission. The TMC alleges the SIR process was intentionally designed to disenfranchise millions of Muslim voters to tilt the election outcome in the BJP’s favor – a claim both the BJP and the Election Commission strongly deny. Modi and other BJP leaders have framed the voter roll cleanup as a crackdown on “illegal Bangladeshi infiltrators”, a framing the TMC argues is targeted directly at West Bengal’s large Muslim community.

    Data compiled by political parties and independent analysts supports uneven exclusion patterns that have amplified these concerns. Muslims account for roughly 27% of West Bengal’s population per the 2011 national census, but make up 34% of the 9 million deleted voters and 65% of the 2.7 million undecided cases. The deletions have not been limited to Muslim voters, however: in Kolkata, the state capital, up to 29.6% of all registered voters have been struck from rolls across the city, and in the border district of North 24 Parganas, which lost 1.26 million voters (15% of its electorate), most deletions were Hindu voters, including large numbers of Dalit Hindus from the Matua migrant community. In Paschim Bardhaman district, 80% of deleted voters are Hindi-speaking Hindus with roots in northern India.

    India’s Supreme Court has allowed the election process to move forward even as 2.7 million voter disputes remain unresolved, scheduling a hearing on the challenges for April 13 – leaving only a narrow, uncertain window for any last-minute relief. Banerjee, whose TMC has held power in West Bengal since 2011, has vowed to return to the Supreme Court to challenge the decision, arguing that holding an election while millions are disenfranchised undermines democratic principles.

    Political observers and voters alike have voiced deep alarm over the impact of the deletions. Political scientist Sibaji Pratim Basu called the situation unprecedented, noting “there is no example of an election happening in India with voters’ rights remaining suspended.” He described leaving 2.7 million voters off the rolls as “an absurd proposition” and “a shame for democracy.” London School of Economics anthropologist Mukulika Banerjee added that voting is far more than a procedural act for marginalized communities, saying “By denying them their right to vote, one takes away one of their fundamental rights, and one that is hugely meaningful to them and allows them to assert their voice.”

    BJP leaders have defended the SIR process, arguing that purging non-citizen voters is a constitutional requirement. “The constitution says only Indian citizens can choose prime ministers and chief ministers. Therefore, purging non-citizens was important,” said Sukanta Majumdar, a BJP federal minister from West Bengal. Majumdar blamed the TMC state government for delays in resolving the 2.7 million disputed cases, arguing the party’s decision to bring the matter to the Supreme Court slowed the revision process, and rejected claims the Election Commission is biased toward the BJP.

    For affected voters like Hasnara Khatun, a 35-year-old resident of Harishchandrapur constituency along the West Bengal-Bangladesh border, the deletion has left her feeling disenfranchised and uncertain. Five of seven members of Khatun’s multi-generational voting family have been removed from the rolls, leaving her to question her status as an Indian citizen. “We have been effectively turned into non-citizens. Who knows what comes next?” Khatun said. “The system can’t be trusted anymore. Therefore, the legal battle will go on, but we won’t stop protests either.”

    West Bengal holds outsized political importance in Indian national politics: it is the fourth-largest state by parliamentary representation, and the BJP has not yet won control of its state government. In the 2021 assembly elections, the BJP secured just a quarter of the state’s 294 assembly seats, making the 2026 race a key target for the national ruling party. The voter roll controversy has now overtaken nearly every other campaign issue, setting the stage for one of the most tense and closely watched elections in India’s recent history.

  • US, Iran fail to reach a deal after talks in Pakistan

    US, Iran fail to reach a deal after talks in Pakistan

    After 21 hours of marathon face-to-face negotiations hosted in Islamabad, Pakistan, the United States and Iran have failed to strike any binding agreement, throwing a fragile two-week truce into severe jeopardy just six weeks into a conflict that has already claimed thousands of lives and roiled global energy markets.