标签: Asia

亚洲

  • A Chinese box office hit sparks a debate about identity in Singapore

    A Chinese box office hit sparks a debate about identity in Singapore

    This summer, a low-budget Chinese drama has become an unexpected cultural flashpoint halfway across the world, after a sleeper box office success from China reignited long-simmering conversations about cultural identity and language policy in Singapore. *Dear You*, a nostalgic story exploring family bonds, hardship, and cross-generational hope, was shot almost entirely in Teochew — a regional dialect originating from China’s Chaoshan area that remains a mother tongue for many older ethnic Chinese communities across Southeast Asia, including Singapore.

    When the film arrived in Singaporean cinemas this month, local audiences were quick to express frustration: most screenings were slated to run only with a Mandarin dub. Mandarin, one of Singapore’s four official languages alongside English, Malay, and Tamil, has been actively promoted by the government for decades as a unifying common language for the country’s Chinese majority, at the expense of regional Chinese dialects. Only eight special original-language Teochew screenings were initially scheduled, and all tickets sold out in under two hours, highlighting overwhelming unmet demand from local viewers.

    Wu Silin, a Singaporean church worker who secured tickets to one of the rare original screenings alongside her mother, noted that experiencing the film in Teochew added an irreplaceable layer of personal meaning for community members. The outcry over limited original screenings quickly grew into a broader public debate about Singapore’s decades-long language policy. Even expats like Anna Zhang, a Beijing-based worker who relocated to Singapore for employment, sought out the original Teochew cut with subtitles, arguing that dubbed versions lose the authentic nuance of the original characters’ performances.

    Written on a modest budget and led mostly by first-time actors, *Dear You* follows the journey of a young southern Chinese villager who travels to Thailand to track down his grandfather, who fled his hometown in 1948 to avoid conscription during China’s civil war. The grandfather built a new life as a trishaw rider in 1950s Bangkok, sending years of longing-filled letters back to his wife and children in China. The story’s themes resonate deeply with Singapore’s ethnic Chinese community, 70% of the country’s total population, whose ancestors were part of the massive 19th to mid-20th century wave of Chinese migration that brought millions to Southeast Asia in search of new lives.

    “Dialects have always been the root of where the Singaporean Chinese come from. Mandarin, I would say, is mostly a superimposed language that we learn from schools,” explained Lee Cher Leng, an associate professor of Chinese studies at the National University of Singapore. “I think it’s really interesting that a small movie like that would bring something so impactful to the surface.”

    Singapore’s official approach to dialects dates back to the 1960s, when the government adopted a national bilingual policy that designated English as a universal working language and assigned one of four ethnic “mother tongues” — Mandarin for Chinese Singaporeans — to be taught in schools. The 1979 Speak Mandarin Campaign amplified this push, aiming to unify the linguistically diverse Chinese community by replacing regional dialects including Teochew, Hokkien, Cantonese, and Hakka with standard Mandarin. By the 1980s, dialect content had been removed from radio and television, and most films screened in Singapore were dubbed into Mandarin.

    The policy has been undeniably successful in its original goals: in 1980, roughly 70% of Singaporean Chinese spoke a dialect at home. By 2020, that number had plummeted to just 8.7%, with dialect use now concentrated almost entirely among a shrinking cohort of elderly Singaporeans. Today, nearly half of all Singaporeans report English as their most comfortable language, but restrictions on dialect content remain largely in place.

    In response to the public outcry over *Dear You*, Singapore’s Ministry of Communications and Information acknowledged widespread calls for more accessible dialect film screenings in a public statement, announcing that authorities would adopt a “more flexible approach” to the policy. Following the initial sell-out of the eight original screenings, a second round of 5,000 tickets for eight additional shows sold out in two hours, and authorities approved 50 more Teochew-language screenings just days later. Some viewers even reported planning cross-border trips to neighboring Malaysia to catch the original cut before the additional screenings were approved.

    The debate has drawn commentary from across Singapore’s political and cultural spheres. In an open letter published in *The Straits Times*, two local filmmakers argued that the Speak Mandarin Campaign had fully achieved its founding goal of unifying Chinese Singaporeans around Mandarin, and that relaxing dialect screening rules would signal a new, mature approach to celebrating the community’s cultural diversity. Opposition Member of Parliament Dennis Tan echoed this sentiment in a Facebook post, framing dialects as “the living, breathing repositories of our forefathers’ journeys, customs, and identity.” Two sitting lawmakers have also formally submitted questions to authorities about revising rules for screening original dialect films, ensuring the conversation will continue in official circles.

    For many Singaporeans, the film is more than entertainment — it is a window into a fading cultural heritage. Wu, who attended the original screening, pointed to a Teochew coming-of-age ritual featured in the film called “leaving the garden,” which was held for her when she turned 15 but was omitted for her niece’s 15th birthday last year, an example of how cultural traditions tied to dialect are disappearing alongside the language itself.

    While a growing number of young Singaporeans have begun pursuing connection to their ancestral roots in recent years — taking dialect classes, organizing trips to ancestral hometowns in China, and seeking out community dialect events — academics warn this grassroots interest is not enough to reverse the long-term decline of dialect use. “Young people who are learning them now … You can learn it like a foreign language and learn it for fun. But if no-one is speaking it in daily life, you’re not going to be able to retain it,” said Tan Ying Ying, an associate professor at Nanyang Technological University specializing in dialect studies. She described the public uproar over *Dear You* as “perhaps like grieving a loss” for a cultural heritage that is slowly fading from daily life in Singapore.

  • Two Republicans flip votes, blocking Iran war powers resolution

    Two Republicans flip votes, blocking Iran war powers resolution

    In a dramatic late-night reversal that capped a day of intense White House pressure and partisan friction, two Senate Republicans who had previously backed a measure calling for a withdrawal of U.S. forces from the ongoing conflict in Iran flipped their votes Wednesday, bowing to aggressive public and private berating from former President Donald Trump. Trump had lashed out at GOP lawmakers who supported the earlier resolution, branding them “losers” who were offering what he called “aid and comfort to the enemy.”

    Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who was reported to have engaged in a shouting match with Trump over the Iran policy during a closed-door GOP lunch earlier the same day, ultimately joined nearly all other Senate Republicans in opposing the war powers resolution pushed by Democrats. Just one day prior, Cassidy had backed a separate, non-binding symbolic measure that called for the removal of U.S. troops from the Iran conflict. The second Republican, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, also switched his position, moving to vote “present” after direct urging from the president.

    The hastily scheduled late vote was organized explicitly by Senate Republican leaders to placate Trump, who had publicly fumed over the initial symbolic resolution that passed the upper chamber earlier in the week. Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, the lead Democratic sponsor of the resolution that Republicans successfully blocked Wednesday, called the entire process nothing more than an effort to appease what he described as Trump’s “temper tantrum.”

    Kaine argued that after both chambers of Congress, when previously led by Republican majorities, took the historic step of voting to affirm that any expanded war against Iran would be illegal without explicit congressional authorization, Trump traveled to the Capitol to intimidate Republican senators who had upheld their constitutional oaths of office. Kaine emphasized that Wednesday’s flipped votes do not erase Congress’s formal stated position that further military action against Iran cannot proceed without a formal congressional vote of approval.

    Following the successful block of the resolution, Trump celebrated the outcome in a late-night post on his personal social media platform. He thanked top Senate Republican leaders and specifically highlighted the vote reversals by Cassidy and Paul as a key victory. Notably, Cassidy, who lost his re-election bid last month, had publicly stated just hours before the vote that he would not be bullied by the administration. After flipping his position, he said the White House had provided him with a thorough national security briefing on Iran that addressed many of his core concerns. Multiple reports indicate Trump called Cassidy a “lunatic” during their private confrontation at Wednesday’s lunch.

    Wednesday’s vote unfolded against the backdrop of fragile diplomatic negotiations between the U.S. and Iran, aimed at reaching a peaceful resolution to the conflict that Trump launched in late February. The military campaign has killed thousands of Iranians, disrupted global economic activity, and driven up consumer prices across the United States.

    Earlier on Wednesday, the White House formally submitted a request to Congress for an $87.6 billion emergency supplemental funding package, nearly $70 billion of which would go toward covering operational military costs incurred during the Iran war.

    Democratic lawmakers across the chamber have uniformly rejected the funding request, framing it as a waste of critical taxpayer resources that could be directed toward domestic priorities. Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said in a statement that the tens of billions in military spending requested by the Trump administration could instead be used to shore up American healthcare, provide food assistance to hungry children, and ease the financial burden working families face covering basic daily needs. Boyle added that Trump is forcing American taxpayers to continue paying for a reckless, unnecessary war that has pushed gas and consumer goods prices sharply higher, put U.S. military personnel in unnecessary danger, and done nothing to improve security in the Middle East.

    Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democratic appropriator in the Senate, said she would refuse to rubber-stamp tens of billions more in funding for what she called a disastrous, unnecessary war of choice. She argued that the president tells the American public there is insufficient funding for core domestic priorities like healthcare, affordable housing, and childcare, while simultaneously claiming there should be unlimited taxpayer money for an unpopular war most Americans do not support.

  • Archbishop of Canterbury vows to help Palestinians achieve ‘freedom you deserve’

    Archbishop of Canterbury vows to help Palestinians achieve ‘freedom you deserve’

    During a high-profile visit to the occupied West Bank, the head of the Church of England, Archbishop Dame Sarah Mullally, has publicly committed to using her influential position to advocate for the peace and freedom that Palestinians are inherently owed, while framing the daily acts of persistence amid occupation as powerful examples of “faithful resistance”.

    Mullally delivered these remarks in a sermon this past Sunday at St Peter’s Anglican Church, located in Birzeit, a Palestinian Christian community in the West Bank. She told gathered worshippers that this quiet, faithful resistance does not always take dramatic forms: it can be seen in the everyday efforts of parents who navigate the complex, restrictive network of Israeli checkpoints every day just to earn a living to support their households, or to get their children to school to build a better future. It is also visible, she added, in the simple act of congregating week after week in this church to share communion together.

    “All these acts of faithful resistance point to our hope in Jesus Christ and reflect your ongoing struggle for freedom and dignity,” Mullally told the congregation. She acknowledged the profound gap in experience between her own life and the reality of Palestinians under occupation, noting that she takes for granted basic privileges that are out of reach for most people living in the territory: the ability to cross borders and checkpoints without obstruction, to gather freely with neighboring communities, and to travel to Jerusalem without restriction.

    “I will use my role as archbishop to seek the peace you desire and the freedom you deserve,” she stated. Mullally also emphasized that the global Christian community has not forgotten Palestinian people, adding: “The church is called to rejoice with those who rejoice and to weep with those who weep. The church stands with you in your right to live in freedom and dignity.”

    As part of her regional tour, which also included stops in Jerusalem, Nazareth and Bethlehem alongside Hosam Naoum, the Anglican Archbishop in Jerusalem, Mullally met with 26-year-old Palestinian Christian woman Layan Nasir, who has been detained by Israeli authorities three times over the past five years. After being welcomed by Nasir’s family in their home, Mullally said she would hold the family in her prayers, and ask for divine blessing and healing for Layan following what she described as the terrible trauma of her imprisonment. She also extended her prayers to all people held in what she called unjust detention across Palestine, Israel, and the entire globe.

    Mullally noted that the core purpose of her visit was to create space to listen directly to the experiences of local communities, to hear both their hopes and their anxieties, their moments of joy and the enormous challenges they face daily, and to join them in praying for justice and peace that can bring healing to both people and the land.

    This visit comes amid growing concern from senior Church of England leaders over the deteriorating situation in the occupied Palestinian territories. Last year, four senior bishops from the church called on the British government to take immediate action to address escalating Israeli settler violence, warning that the ongoing aggression is eroding Palestinian life and putting the long-standing Christian presence in the Holy Land at severe risk. In their statement, the bishops highlighted that as the war in Gaza continues, conditions in the West Bank have deteriorated rapidly, with rising levels of settler violence and intimidation—including direct attacks on land and church properties in Taybeh, another Christian-majority West Bank town.

    Just earlier this year, the Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, shared his own firsthand experience of occupation during a visit to the region, recounting that he was stopped at checkpoints and intimidated by armed militias who barred him from visiting Palestinian families in the West Bank. “It was sobering for me to see this wall for real on my visit to the Holy Land, and we were stopped at various checkpoints and intimidated by Israeli militias who told us that we couldn’t visit Palestinian families in the occupied West Bank,” Cottrell said.

    The warnings from Church of England leaders align with recent alerts from Palestinian church affairs officials. Just last month, a delegation from Palestine’s Higher Presidential Committee for Church Affairs told European Union officials that long-standing Israeli policies pose an existential threat to the centuries-old Palestinian Christian community in the Holy Land.

  • Drones and decomposing babies: What’s in UN report on Israel’s genocide of Palestinian children

    Drones and decomposing babies: What’s in UN report on Israel’s genocide of Palestinian children

    The United Nations’ leading independent investigative body focused on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict released a landmark 88-page report this week, concluding that Israeli security forces have systematically and deliberately targeted Palestinian children as a central component of alleged genocide in the Gaza Strip. The inquiry, conducted by the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel, documents widespread harm against children across Gaza and the occupied West Bank dating from October 7, 2023, stretching past the October 2025 ceasefire.

    Srinivasan Muralidhar, chair of the commission and an experienced Indian jurist, stated that the weight of collected evidence irrefutably confirms that Palestinian children have been intentionally targeted and killed by Israeli forces. Muralidhar emphasized that violations have persisted despite the ceasefire agreement, noting that Israel continues to disregard both the truce terms and its obligations under international law to protect Palestinian civilian children.

    This latest report builds on the commission’s earlier finding that Israel bears responsibility for genocide in Gaza, detailing two distinct pathways through which children have been targeted. The first involves direct strikes using precision weaponry, including military quadcopters and sniper rifles. The second is an indirect, systemic campaign to destroy the basic conditions required for children to survive.

    The inquiry’s compiled casualty data underscores the scale of child harm: between the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack and October 7, 2025, Israeli military operations killed at least 20,179 children and injured an additional 44,143 across Gaza. These figures account for 30% of all total fatalities and 26% of all injuries recorded during the period. Children under the age of five made up at least 5,031 of those killed, including 1,029 infants under one year old and approximately 420 newborns. The commission estimates an additional 5,160 children remain trapped and buried under rubble from Israeli strikes, and notes that the true death toll is almost certainly higher, as many deaths have gone unrecorded amid the breakdown of civil governance and health infrastructure.

    Investigators documented a repeated pattern of intentional targeting of children with precision weapons, collecting testimony from 17 Gaza-based medical practitioners who described treating large numbers of children with single gunshot wounds to the head and upper torso, inflicted by Israeli snipers or drone operators. One doctor told the commission that the consistent pattern of injuries indicated Israeli soldiers were engaging in what amounted to “deliberate shooting teenage boys in a game of target practice.” Forensic analysis of 15 of these cases confirmed that 12 of the victims suffered single gunshot wounds consistent with the accounts of intentional targeting.

    The report includes detailed accounts of multiple specific, verified cases of deliberate child targeting. On January 29, 2024, Israeli forces from the 401st Brigade, 162nd Division shot and killed five-year-old Hind Rajab in the Tal al-Hawa neighborhood of Gaza City, alongside six of her family members. When two Palestinian Red Crescent paramedics traveled to the area to rescue the child, Israeli forces shelled their ambulance, killing both first responders. The commission concluded Israeli forces deliberately shot the family and intentionally obstructed the medical rescue mission.

    Less than a week earlier, on January 24, 2024, Israeli soldiers from the 98th Division operating in Khan Younis shot and killed a 15-year-old boy who had exited his family’s home carrying a white flag after receiving an Israeli evacuation order. When the boy’s 20-year-old brother ran to his aid, soldiers shot him as well. The commission ruled the shooting was deliberate.

    Additional cases include an April 12, 2024 strike by an Israeli quadcopter operator on a 10-day-old infant who was being breastfed by his mother inside a shelter tent in the Nuseirat refugee camp. The commission confirmed the operator had a clear, unobstructed view of the interior of the tent before opening fire; the baby survived but now experiences permanent seizures. On August 24, 2024, another quadcopter operator shot a four-year-old girl in the head while she ate with her family in a Khan Younis tent. She survived but was left permanently paralyzed on her left side, with the inquiry confirming she was deliberately targeted. Even after the October 2025 ceasefire, the commission documented more than 100 additional child killings and hundreds of injuries in the weeks immediately following the truce. One high-profile post-ceasefire case involved two brothers, ages nine and 10, who were killed by a drone strike from the Israeli Kfir Brigade while gathering firewood for their wheelchair-using father near Bani Suheila in southern Gaza. Israel claimed the boys were armed suspects crossing a newly established Israeli demarcation line inside Gaza known as the “yellow line,” but the commission dismissed the claim as baseless: the boys were more than 300 meters from Israeli positions, were visibly children engaged in collecting firewood, and the drone operator had an unobstructed view before firing.

    Beyond Gaza, the inquiry documented widespread child targeting in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem. Between October 7, 2023, and October 20, 2025, Israeli forces killed 213 Palestinian children in the West Bank, with investigators confirming a systemic pattern of labeling boys as “terrorists” or “future terrorists” to justify targeting. One case details the January 25, 2025 killing of a two-year-old girl, shot in the back of the head by soldiers from the Menashe Brigade while the child ate dinner with her family in southern Jenin. She is the youngest child killed in the West Bank since the start of the current conflict. Another case records the January 28, 2025 shooting of a 10-year-old boy by soldiers from the Ephraim Brigade during a raid on his family’s home in Tulkarm. CCTV footage confirmed the boy was unarmed; Israeli forces delayed an ambulance transporting him to care for 30 minutes, and one soldier openly told the boy’s father, “I am the one who shot your son. God willing, he will die.” The child succumbed to his injuries on February 7, 2025.

    The report also documents widespread violence against children carried out by Israeli settlers in the West Bank. Between January and June 2025 alone, settlers carried out more than 1,000 attacks across 230 Palestinian communities. Specific incidents include the April 2025 knife-point abduction of two siblings under five years old who were playing outside their home; settlers dragged the children to an olive grove and tied them to a tree. In August 2024, armed settlers abducted two 15-year-old boys who were herding cattle, beat them, sexually assaulted them, and fractured one boy’s leg, with one settler urinating on the victim.

    Mistreatment of detained Palestinian children is another core finding of the report. Since October 7, 2023, Israeli forces have detained more than 1,655 children in the West Bank, 600 of whom were arrested in 2025 alone. As of December 31, 2025, 51% of all detained children are held under administrative detention—imprisonment without charge or trial—the highest share ever recorded. The commission collected consistent testimony of abuse: children are beaten, blindfolded, forced into painful stress positions on sharp gravel, terrorized by attack dogs from the moment of arrest, and denied food, water, and medical care by prison authorities. Multiple accounts confirm systemic sexual violence against detained boys, including rape by prison guards. One 17-year-old boy from Ramallah died in March 2025 at Megiddo Prison; Israeli authorities had been aware of his head trauma, severe malnutrition, and weight loss since December 2024 but failed to provide any medical care. A post-mortem confirmed he died from prolonged, severe starvation, with the commission ruling his death amounts to the war crimes of torture, inhuman treatment, and wilful killing, and that Israeli prison authorities are directly responsible.

    The report also details the systematic destruction of Gaza’s child-serving infrastructure, including hospitals and schools. All three of Gaza’s major pediatric hospitals were attacked and forced to close within the first two months of hostilities. Before October 2023, Gaza operated 178 incubators across eight neonatal intensive care units; Israeli attacks and the ongoing siege reduced that number to just 54 by November 2024, forcing medical staff to place three or four infants in a single incubator. At Al-Nasr Paediatric Hospital, Israeli forces cut power, gave staff just 30 minutes to evacuate, and blocked evacuation efforts for remaining patients. When a ceasefire allowed investigators access weeks later, four dead babies were found decomposing in the neonatal unit, still connected to non-functional life support machines. At least 15 newborns died of preventable hypothermia between December 2024 and February 2025, a direct result of the conditions created by the Israeli siege. Israel’s blockade and attacks on reproductive healthcare have pushed miscarriage rates up by as much as 300% since October 2023, and by October 2024, Gaza women were three times more likely to die in childbirth than before the war. As of March 2026, 70% of all newborns in Gaza are premature or underweight.

    In the education sector, Israeli forces hit 459 of Gaza’s 564 school buildings between October 2023 and October 2025, with more than 97% of all schools suffering damage or complete destruction. More than 668,000 school-age Gaza children have missed three full academic years and been locked out of formal education. The inquiry documented multiple cases of Israeli soldiers filming themselves during controlled demolitions of schools and posting the footage online. In one video, a soldier can be heard saying, “In my childhood, I’ve always dreamed of blowing up my school. Today I’m blowing up a school. Wow.” In another, a soldier mocks Palestinian students, saying they will “not be engineers any more.” The commission confirmed the 252nd Division carried out deliberate demolitions of at least two UN-run schools in Beit Hanoun in November 2023, and that Israeli forces have seized dozens of other schools to use as military bases, weapons storage, and barracks.

    Systemic starvation of children has been another key tactic, the report finds. By October 2025, UNICEF had recorded 151 child deaths from malnutrition caused by Israel’s siege and blockade, with July 2025 seeing 24 children under five die from starvation-related causes. The blockade also derailed a planned fourth round of polio vaccinations for 600,000 Gaza children scheduled for April 2025, allowing polio to re-emerge in Gaza in August 2024, 25 years after the disease was eradicated from the territory.

    Investigators also documented a widespread pattern of dehumanization of Palestinian children, with at least 35 instances of Israeli soldiers filming themselves destroying or mocking children’s toys, schoolwork, and personal belongings in wrecked Palestinian homes, schools, and public spaces, then posting the footage to social media. The commission concluded these are not isolated incidents, but reflect an institutionalized culture of dehumanization across Israeli military units, with no disciplinary action taken by commanders against soldiers responsible for the acts.

    In its final conclusions, the commission ruled that there are reasonable grounds to confirm Israeli authorities and security forces have continued to commit genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in Gaza, and war crimes in the West Bank. On the charge of genocide, the inquiry notes that the deliberate targeting of children is a key piece of evidence establishing genocidal intent: as the bearers of Palestinian biological and social continuity, targeting children is a deliberate strategy to destroy the Palestinian people as a group. The commission named specific Israeli military units responsible for documented killings, urged the International Criminal Court to prioritize crimes against children in its ongoing investigation into the situation, and called for full accountability for all commanders bearing responsibility for the violations. Israel did not respond to any of the commission’s 13 requests for information or access to Israeli territory for the investigation.

  • China-US youth pickleball tournament builds cross-cultural ties

    China-US youth pickleball tournament builds cross-cultural ties

    On Tuesday, a landmark people-to-people exchange event between China and the United States, the 2026 China-US Youth Pickleball Friendship Tournament, was officially held at the University of International Business and Economics in the Chinese capital, Beijing. The on-court competition brought together two distinct groups of young participants: student members of a study tour delegation originating from Iowa, the United States, and teenage athletes from Shijiazhuang Foreign Language School, located in North China’s Hebei Province.

    Organizers of the friendly competition note that the event was designed around a far more ambitious goal than simply crowning a winning team. By bringing young people from the two countries together through the fast-growing, accessible sport of pickleball, the tournament seeks to build a new, informal bridge for cross-cultural connection and dialogue. The initiative focuses on nurturing the next generation of advocates and informal ambassadors for lasting China-US friendship, with the ultimate aim of making a tangible, positive contribution to the long-term development of bilateral relations between the two nations.

  • MP urges UK government to take action on English football ties to Israeli occupation

    MP urges UK government to take action on English football ties to Israeli occupation

    A cross-party independent British Member of Parliament, Iqbal Mohamed, has launched a formal call for urgent government intervention to cut ties between English football and corporations accused of complicity in Israel’s illegal occupation, apartheid policies, and reported war crimes against the Palestinian people.

    In an official letter addressed to UK Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy dated Wednesday, and shared publicly via his social media channels on June 24 2026, Mohamed laid out his case that top-flight English football is being used to ‘sportswash’ grave human rights violations against Palestinians. He argued that the English Premier League (EPL), its 20 member clubs, and the Football Association (FA) — the governing body of English football — have no business maintaining commercial partnerships with firms linked to documented abuses of Palestinian human rights.

    Mohaved’s appeal draws heavily on a new investigative report released by UK-based pro-Palestinian campaign group War on Want, titled *Red Card: English Premier League Sportswashing of Israel’s Atrocities against the Palestinians*. According to the MP, the investigation identifies 16 major sponsoring companies that the United Nations and other leading international authoritative bodies have linked to complicity in Israeli violations. The named firms include global brands Alphabet/Google, AXA, BP, Canon, Carlsberg, Cisco, Coca-Cola, Expedia/Hotels.com, Eurobank, Evelyn Partners, HPE, HSBC, Meta, Oracle, Sony, and Standard Chartered.

    The report further finds that at least 10 top-flight clubs — Arsenal, Aston Villa, Chelsea, Crystal Palace, Everton, Fulham, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, and Tottenham Hotspur — maintain direct sponsorship deals with one or more of these companies. Five clubs — Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham, Manchester City, and Manchester United — were named as the most deeply connected to firms that facilitate Israeli atrocities, while Arsenal, Fulham, both Manchester clubs and Newcastle United were also flagged for potential implication through the activities of their majority owners.

    Mohamed also noted that every EPL club receives indirect backing from Barclays, the league’s headline sponsor. While Barclays ended its practice of underwriting Israeli wartime bonds in 2024, other major sponsors maintain active operations in occupied territories. Coca-Cola, for example, holds subsidiaries and licensing agreements in Israel that operate facilities including agricultural vineyards in occupied East Jerusalem, the occupied West Bank, and the occupied Syrian Golan Heights, all territories held by Israel in violation of international law.

    “I am very concerned that our country’s great football institutions are sportswashing Israel’s atrocities,” Mohamed wrote in the letter. He added: “Our beautiful game must not be used to sportswash such grave injustice. I ask that you ensure that the EPL must not be a profitable safe haven for companies complicit in atrocities.”

    Mohamed is calling on Nandy to facilitate coordinated action between the UK government, the EPL, the FA, individual clubs, and other relevant stakeholders to end all sponsorship and advertising partnerships with linked companies as rapidly as possible. He also urged the government to enforce a policy that ensures no UK entity, public or private, provides material aid or assistance to Israel’s illegal occupation and apartheid regime.

    Beyond commercial ties, the War on Want report also documents alleged restrictions on pro-Palestinian expression within top English football. It found that four EPL clubs — Arsenal, Brighton, Burnley and Everton — have disciplined pro-Palestinian staff and supporters in ways that may violate the right to freedom of expression and constitute unlawful discrimination.

    One high-profile case highlighted in the report is that of Mark Bonnick, an Arsenal kitman with 22 years of service at the club. Bonnick posted online criticism of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, and following what the report describes as a coordinated smear campaign led by politically motivated individuals who falsely accused him of antisemitism, he was abruptly terminated from his role on Christmas Eve 2024.

    Following an internal investigation by the FA, no misconduct was found. Arsenal’s own internal review also confirmed there was no evidence of antisemitism, a conclusion backed by independent Jewish anti-racism campaigners. Despite this, Arsenal dismissed Bonnick on the grounds that his social media activity had brought the club “into disrepute”.

    War on Want said of the case: “Arsenal appears to have prioritised seemingly prejudiced and racist views of those who targeted him online rather than its staff’s livelihood, wellbeing and rights – including the right to freedom of expression in support of people suffering genocide, illegal occupation and apartheid.”

    As of publication, no response has been issued from the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, the Culture Secretary’s office, the EPL, the FA, or any of the named clubs or companies in response to Mohamed’s request.

  • Infantino’s Middle East playbook: How Fifa boss uses geopolitics on the World Cup stage

    Infantino’s Middle East playbook: How Fifa boss uses geopolitics on the World Cup stage

    As the 2026 expanded-format FIFA World Cup kicks off across the United States, Mexico and Canada, 48 national teams are competing across 104 matches to claim football’s most coveted global trophy. At the helm of this six-week sporting spectacle is Gianni Infantino, the Swiss-Italian president of FIFA, who oversees a multi-billion-dollar commercial and athletic empire second only to the Olympic Movement in global reach.

    For years, Infantino has publicly maintained that “politics should stay out of football and football should stay out of politics” — but this mantra has repeatedly collided with reality, nowhere more dramatically than across the Middle East, a region that has shaped Infantino’s tenure and drawn constant criticism of his leadership since he took over as FIFA president in 2016, replacing disgraced former chief Sepp Blatter.

    Infantino’s ties to the Middle East are personal as well as professional: his wife Leena al-Ashqar is Lebanese, and he was granted Lebanese citizenship by former President Joseph Aoun in early 2025. As the 2026 World Cup enters its knockout phase, a deep dive into his actions across the region reveals just how deeply intertwined politics and FIFA leadership have become during his tenure.

    The intersection of U.S. politics and FIFA’s operations came into sharp focus early in Infantino’s presidency. In early 2017, then-U.S. President Donald Trump introduced a travel ban targeting six Muslim-majority nations — Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen — a restriction that was later expanded to cover 75 countries during Trump’s second term. By March of that year, Infantino acknowledged the ban could disqualify the U.S. from hosting future World Cups, noting: “Teams who qualify for a World Cup need to have access to the country, otherwise there is no World Cup.” He framed the comment as a general sporting rule rather than a direct rebuke of the Trump administration, a carefully calibrated statement that came just one month before the U.S. officially launched its joint 2026 bid alongside Mexico and Canada, which was awarded to the three nations in June 2018.

    Eight years later, those travel restrictions have created tangible disruptions for the 2026 tournament itself. Iran, whose national side is playing its group stage matches in Los Angeles despite ongoing U.S.-Israeli military action against Iran that has killed thousands of Iranians, has been barred from bringing Iranian fans into the U.S. Iranian head coach Amir Ghalenoei has publicly lashed out at Infantino and FIFA over the unequal treatment, calling his team “the most oppressed one in the whole World Cup.” Ghalenoei revealed that after Iran’s opening match, Infantino visited the squad’s dressing room to inform them they had to leave the U.S. immediately for their training camp in Mexico, adding: “It seems others are doing the planning for us.”

    Other Muslim-majority nations have faced similar entry issues: FIFA-appointed Somali referee Omar Artan was blocked from entering the U.S. over unproven Trump administration claims of ties to suspected terrorist groups. While FIFA ultimately paid Artan his full tournament fee, and UEFA later awarded him a 2026 UEFA Super Cup officiating assignment between Paris Saint-Germain and Aston Villa, the incident highlighted the impact of U.S. policy on the tournament. Iraqi striker Aymen Hussein was detained and questioned for seven hours upon entry to the U.S. before being granted access — and went on to score in Iraq’s opening World Cup match against Norway.

    Critics have repeatedly accused Infantino of currying favor with Trump, a pattern that has played out across the Middle East. In May 2025, multiple FIFA member state delegates staged a walkout of the organization’s annual congress in Paraguay after Infantino arrived hours late, delaying the entire agenda. The delay came after Infantino traveled with Trump on a trip to meet with leaders in Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The incident sparked a public rebuke from UEFA, which accused Infantino of prioritizing “private political interests” over the governance of the sport. Infantino blamed the delay on flight issues, claiming “important discussions took place in regard to the World Cup, and I felt that I needed to be there to represent football and all of you.”

    Trump, who has publicly sought a Nobel Peace Prize, was awarded the first ever “FIFA Peace Prize” by Infantino during the 2026 World Cup draw in Washington D.C. in December 2025. Infantino praised Trump for “exceptional and extraordinary actions to promote peace and unity around the world,” telling the U.S. president “You can always count on my support.” Infantino also attended Trump’s second presidential inauguration in January 2025 and the premiere of a documentary about First Lady Melania Trump, and FIFA maintains a leased office space in New York’s Trump Tower.

    Questions of FIFA’s close ties to Middle Eastern nations with questionable human rights records date back to the 2022 Qatar World Cup, awarded to Qatar in 2010, six years before Infantino took office. The run-up to the first Middle Eastern World Cup was dominated by accusations of sportswashing, driven by reports of widespread migrant worker abuses that killed more than 6,500 migrant workers between 2010 and 2021, many of whom worked on World Cup infrastructure. Critics also raised alarms over extreme summer temperatures, which led organizers to move the tournament to the winter months.

    Facing mounting global criticism, Infantino delivered a controversial 57-minute speech on the eve of the 2022 tournament, declaring: “Today I have very strong feelings. Today I feel Qatari. Today I feel Arab. Today I feel African. Today I feel gay. Today I feel disabled. Today I feel like a migrant worker.” He pushed back against critics, arguing that migrant workers earned higher wages in Qatar than they would in their home countries and claiming labor rights standards matched those of Western Europe. The comments drew fierce condemnation from global human rights groups including Amnesty International, which accused Infantino of ignoring the massive human cost of the tournament and FIFA’s own responsibility for the abuses. Qatari officials dismissed the allegations as racist double standards, but human rights organizations rejected that defense.

    Infantino’s actions around the awarding of future World Cup tournaments have also drawn scrutiny over political maneuvering in the Middle East. The 2030 tournament, marking the centenary of the first World Cup held in Uruguay in 1930, attracted multiple competing bids: a sentimental joint bid from South American nations Uruguay, Argentina, Chile and Paraguay; a European bid from Spain and Portugal that at one point included Ukraine; and a standalone bid from Morocco, which had unsuccessfully bid for the tournament six times previously. Morocco had emerged as a rising football power, reaching the 2022 World Cup semi-finals as the first African nation ever to do so, and winning the 2026 Africa Cup of Nations in a controversial final.

    By late 2024, technical evaluations ranked the joint Morocco-Spain-Portugal bid ahead of other contenders, and in December 2024, an extraordinary online FIFA Congress confirmed Morocco would co-host the 2030 tournament alongside Spain and Portugal, with three ceremonial centenary matches held in South America. But leaked internal messages revealed Infantino had floated the idea of Morocco joining the Spanish-Portuguese bid as early as 2018, contradicting FIFA’s official position that it remained neutral throughout the bidding process. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez acknowledged in a message to then-Spanish FA president Luis Rubiales that both Rubiales and Infantino had proposed the idea to him, with Rubiales noting that FIFA’s neutrality meant the coordination should not be made public. FIFA has repeatedly denied Infantino played any role in bid negotiations. While the decision was praised by many for bringing the World Cup to Africa for only the second time after 2010’s South Africa tournament, critics have raised ongoing concerns about Morocco’s human rights record and its occupation of Western Sahara.

    The 2034 World Cup awarding process drew even sharper criticism, when Saudi Arabia was awarded the tournament as the only eligible bidder. Under FIFA’s continental rotation rules, only Asian and Oceanian confederations were eligible to host 2034, after North America hosted 2026 and Europe/Africa/South America co-host 2030. FIFA opened bidding for 2034 with no advance warning in October 2023, setting a tight 25-day deadline. Saudi Arabia immediately announced its bid, part of the kingdom’s broader strategy to rebrand its global image through major sporting investments, and Australia — the only other potential contender — withdrew before the deadline. FIFA pushed delegates to approve both the 2030 and 2034 hosts as a single package, meaning rejecting one would eliminate both. After a brief round of applause, Infantino declared the result “loud and clear” and approved both bids. Infantino argued the World Cup would act as a “catalyst for social improvements and social change” in Saudi Arabia, but a joint statement from 21 leading human rights organizations including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch condemned the decision as “a moment of great danger” for global human rights.

    Infantino’s tenure has also brought tangible changes for football across the Middle East. In 2018, he lifted a 32-year ban on Iraq hosting competitive international matches, imposed in 1986 during the Iran-Iraq War that forced Iraq to play all home World Cup qualifiers abroad. Iraq has since hosted qualifiers in Basra and Karbala for the 2022 and 2026 tournaments, and qualified for the 2026 World Cup — its first appearance at the finals since 1986.

    In Iran, where women were largely barred from attending football matches after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Infantino took a public stand after the 2019 death of Sahar Khodayari, an Iranian woman who died by self-immolation after being arrested for attempting to enter a stadium disguised as a man. FIFA set a firm deadline for Iran to lift the ban, with Infantino stating: “Our position is clear and firm. Women have to be allowed into football stadiums in Iran.” The Iranian government has since allowed a limited number of women to attend selected matches at Tehran’s Azadi Stadium, though full access remains restricted with small, limited ticket allocations for women.

    Infantino’s most controversial actions in the region center on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where he has faced criticism from all sides. He has attempted to use football as a tool for diplomacy, suggesting during a 2021 visit to Israel that Israel could co-host a future World Cup alongside the United Arab Emirates, noting “nothing is impossible. We need to think big.” The comment came months after the 2020 Abraham Accords, brokered by Trump, normalized relations between Israel and the UAE, and the first UAE club side played in Israel the following year.

    Following the 2023 outbreak of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza that has killed more than 72,000 Palestinians, global calls grew for Israel to be suspended from international football, mirroring the 2022 ban on Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. In early 2026, Infantino called for Russia’s reinstatement to international competition and argued any ban on Israel would be a “defeat.” Months later, FIFA announced it would not sanction the Israeli Football Association for allowing Israeli clubs to play matches in the occupied West Bank, claiming “the final legal status of the West Bank remains an unresolved and highly complex matter under public international law.” Instead, FIFA offered to mediate between the Palestinian and Israeli FAs, a decision that prompted the Palestinian FA to file an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport. FIFA did fine the Israeli FA $185,000 for failing to address repeated incidents of racist and discriminatory abuse by fans of two top Israeli clubs.

    In early 2026, FIFA signed a strategic partnership with Trump’s Board of Peace, a body created to administer post-conflict Gaza that includes no Palestinian representatives. Infantino framed the deal as an effort to “foster investment into football for the purpose of helping the recovery process in post-conflict areas.” Months later, at the 2026 annual FIFA congress, Infantino attempted to orchestrate a public handshake between Palestinian FA president Jibril Rajoub and Israeli FA vice president Basim Sheikh Suliman. Rajoub refused the handshake, exclaiming “We are suffering!” as he left the stage. Susan Shalabi, vice president of the Palestinian FA, later explained that Rajoub told Infantino he “cannot shake the hand of someone the Israelis have brought to whitewash their fascism and genocide.”

    Despite the public rejection, Infantino has pushed forward with plans for a symbolic under-15 youth “peace match” between Israeli and Palestinian teams scheduled for September 2026 in the U.S., according to reporting from The Athletic that has not been confirmed by FIFA. The idea was first proposed by Infantino’s predecessor Sepp Blatter in 2015, but never moved forward after it was rejected by the Palestinian FA, despite support from then-Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Palestinian FA has stated it has no knowledge of the new plans and “rejects any attempt to promote or impose matches with an occupying power that systematically targets Palestinian athletes and sports infrastructure.” The Israeli FA has said it remains willing to use football as a tool to promote normalization and peace in the region.

    As Infantino prepares to run for a fourth term as FIFA president at the organization’s upcoming 2027 congress in Rabat, Morocco, the ongoing tensions between his stated goal of keeping politics out of football and the deep political entanglements of his tenure remain the defining story of his leadership of global football’s governing body.

  • Billionaire who owns Camden Market ‘finances’ Israeli military programmes

    Billionaire who owns Camden Market ‘finances’ Israeli military programmes

    A new investigative report from independent media outlet Novara Media has uncovered a direct connection between three popular UK-based online competition platforms and an Israeli billionaire with a long history of donating to the Israeli military, as a United Nations inquiry recently confirmed Israel’s commission of genocide in Gaza.

    At the center of the revelation is Teddy Sagi, the $7.1 billion billionaire (per Forbes 2024 estimates) who already holds high-profile UK assets including London’s iconic tourist destination Camden Market. Sagi controls a 69.5% majority stake in Winvia Entertainment Group, the British operator behind three of the most visited online prize draw websites in the country: Rev Comps, Best of the Better (BOTB), and Click Competitions.

    Novara’s investigation finds that hundreds of thousands of British consumers enter these platforms every month, paying entry fees in the hopes of winning high-value prizes ranging from luxury sports cars and residential properties to high-end watches and the latest consumer electronics. BOTB alone claims a track record of more than 500,000 unique winners and has disbursed over £147 million in total prizes to date, drawing consistent consumer engagement across the UK.

    Beyond his ownership of the prize draw group, Sagi holds a sprawling global business empire that includes gambling software giant Playtech, British-Israeli cybersecurity firm Kape Technologies, and a portfolio of major VPN services counting ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, Private Internet Access, and ZenMate among its holdings.

    What has drawn renewed scrutiny in light of the crisis in Gaza, however, is Sagi’s longstanding pattern of financial contributions to the Israeli military. According to Novara’s reporting, as recently as November 2023 – weeks after Israel’s military campaign in Gaza began, when the Palestinian death toll already topped 15,000 – Sagi donated 1 million Israeli shekels (equivalent to roughly $340,000) to fund homebound taxi transport for Israeli soldiers on leave from frontline positions.

    That donation is just one in a series of contributions dating back years. Before the 2023 campaign, Sagi gave more than $3 million to an Israeli Ministry of Defense scholarship program for discharged soldiers. During a 2019 industry gala, he also publicly committed to offering employment at his global companies for active Israeli troops. Sagi is no stranger to controversy either: he was named in the 2021 Pandora Papers leak, which linked him to no fewer than 60 companies registered in secretive offshore tax havens. In 1996, he also served five months in an Israeli prison following conviction on fraud and bribery charges.

    The revelations come just as a United Nations Commission of Inquiry released a long-awa report confirming that Israel has committed acts of genocide in Gaza through the deliberate targeting of Palestinian civilians, particularly children. Commission chair Srinivasan Muralidhar confirmed to reporters that since the launch of Israel’s campaign on October 7, 2023, more than 20,000 Palestinian children have been killed, and an additional 44,000 have been injured. Even after an agreed ceasefire in 2025, Muralidhar noted, children continue to face harm, with Israel disregarding both ceasefire terms and its obligation to protect Palestinian civilians under international law. Overall, the total Palestinian death toll from the campaign has surpassed 73,000, with more than 170,000 people injured, according to the commission’s data.

    Novara Media reached out to Winvia Entertainment Group for comment on the connections to Sagi and his donations to the Israeli military, but no response has been made public. This reporting was aggregated and contextualized by independent global outlet Middle East Eye, which specializes in on-the-ground coverage of the Middle East and North Africa region.

  • India beats Bangladesh and sets up must-win clash with Australia at Women’s T20 World Cup

    India beats Bangladesh and sets up must-win clash with Australia at Women’s T20 World Cup

    At Old Trafford in Manchester, England, India has edged closer to a Women’s Twenty20 World Cup semifinal spot after a five-wicket victory over Bangladesh on Thursday, putting the team in position to punch its ticket to the knockout stage with an upset over undefeated Australia this weekend.

    Despite a disjointed, error-riddled fielding performance that saw Indian players drop four early catches and medium-pacer Nandni Sharma receive two official warnings for overstepping the pitch mark, India still restricted Bangladesh to a total of 136 runs for the loss of 8 wickets at the close of the innings. Bangladesh’s struggle to capitalize on India’s fielding mistakes stemmed from a critical gap in its lineup: a lack of power hitters capable of turning small errors into a match-winning big total. The team’s top scorers were Juairiya Ferdous, who notched 33 runs before being caught and bowled by Nandni in the ninth over, and captain Nigar Sultana, who contributed 32 runs before being stumped late in the innings.

    India’s successful chase got off to a flying start thanks to a lucky break for star batter Shafali Verma: Bangladesh wicketkeepers dropped Verma behind the stumps in the very first over, an error that would prove decisive. Verma took full advantage of the second chance, powering India to 63 runs for the loss of just one wicket during the powerplay segment, and hit a 29-ball half-century—her second fifty of the entire tournament. Though she was stumped for 53 runs shortly after reaching the milestone, her early blitz put India firmly in control of the chase. Additional contributions from Yastika Bhatia (23 runs) and Jemimah Rodrigues (26 runs) saw India cross the finish line at 139 for 5 with a full 19 balls left to spare.

    Speaking after the match, Verma expressed mild disappointment with her own performance, saying, “Was sad I got out. Would’ve been happier had I batted through.”

    The win sets up a winner-takes-all final group stage match against four-time unbeaten Australia, scheduled for this Sunday at London’s iconic Lord’s Cricket Ground, which has already sold out all tickets for the highly anticipated clash. Australia has cruised to four wins from four matches so far in the tournament, including a victory over South Africa—the same side that handily defeated India just last week.

    Indian captain Harmanpreet Kaur made her team’s ambitions clear following the win over Bangladesh, stating, “All set for Australia. We’ll get a lot of confidence if we win that.”

    Later the same day, South Africa was scheduled to face off against the Netherlands in their own group stage fixture.

  • Israeli forces kill unarmed man ‘in bedroom’ during West Bank home raid

    Israeli forces kill unarmed man ‘in bedroom’ during West Bank home raid

    In a pre-dawn incursion into a Palestinian village in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday, Israeli occupation forces shot and killed an unarmed 32-year-old Palestinian man inside his own bedroom, according to local reporting and family accounts of the fatal incident.

    The victim, identified as Mustafa Taha Mustafa al-Khatib, resided alone in his home in Sarta, a small village located west of Salfit, with the rest of his immediate family living across the border in Jordan. Yaseen al-Khatib, the victim’s uncle, shared detailed testimony with regional outlet Al-Araby Al-Jadeed outlining the sequence of events that led to the killing.

    Per Yaseen’s account, Mustafa had been asleep when Israeli forces arrived at his home to conduct the raid. Moving slowly to wake and dress himself, he was delayed in responding to the soldiers’ demands at the door. Before he could exit to open the door, Israeli troops forced their way inside the property, advanced directly to his bedroom, and opened fire multiple times, striking Mustafa in the chest, head and hand.

    Witnesses also confirmed that after the shooting, Israeli forces cordoned off the area and blocked local residents from reaching the wounded man to administer emergency first aid. By the time Israeli troops withdrew from the village and Palestinian paramedics gained access to the home, Mustafa had already succumbed to his severe injuries. Paramedics subsequently transferred his body to a local hospital for processing. Graphic footage of the victim’s body inside the home circulated widely across social media platforms in the hours after the raid.

    This latest fatality pushes the total number of Palestinians killed by Israeli forces and settlers in the occupied West Bank since the beginning of 2026 to 72, according to official data from the Palestinian Ministry of Health. The death toll includes 17 children, five adult women and two elderly Palestinian people.

    Fatal shootings like this one are not an isolated incident: Israeli military forces conduct nightly raid and arrest operations across West Bank population centers, most of which are carried out in the early hours of the morning when residents are asleep. These operations regularly result in the death of Palestinian civilians and the detention of dozens more each month.

    Current data from Palestinian prisoners’ rights organizations shows that approximately 9,300 Palestinians are currently being held in Israeli detention facilities. Nearly half of these detainees are being held without formal charge or trial, under Israeli administrative detention laws that allow for indefinite detention based on secret evidence that the accused is not permitted to see.

    The incident comes amid growing international scrutiny of the expanding pattern of violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, linked to the ongoing expansion of illegal Israeli settlements, a process that a recent on-the-ground report by British journalist Peter Oborne characterized as state-supported ethnic cleansing. The report was published by Middle East Eye, an independent media outlet that provides original coverage of the Middle East and North Africa region.