标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Names and ages of children killed in strike on Iranian school

    Names and ages of children killed in strike on Iranian school

    A devastating aerial assault on the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab, Hormozgan province, has resulted in the deaths of at least 165 individuals, predominantly young children, according to multiple sources. The attack, attributed to joint US-Israeli military operations, employed a controversial ‘double tap’ tactic where a second strike targets first responders and survivors shortly after the initial explosion.

    Eyewitness accounts from Red Crescent medics describe a horrific scene where school administrators attempted to protect students by moving them to a prayer hall following the first impact. As parents arrived to retrieve their children, a subsequent missile struck the same shelter area, dramatically increasing the casualty count. School staff reported being rendered speechless by the overwhelming sounds of children’s screams and cries amidst the devastation.

    Middle East Eye has independently verified 61 victims through cross-referencing sources including Iran’s Gymnastics Federation, handwritten casualty lists, and Tasnim news agency reports. The documented fatalities include 25 boys, 26 girls, eight women, one man, and a two-month-old infant. Among the youngest confirmed victims were Sara Shayesteh (5), Ehsan Saleminia (6), and Salma Zakeri (6).

    US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth acknowledged the incident days after the strike, stating that an investigation was underway. The attack has sparked international condemnation and widespread mourning across Iran, with mass funerals attended by thousands of grieving community members.

    The extensive victim list includes:
    – Hana Dehqani, 8
    – Arya Bahadori, 9
    – Ahmad Soltani, 8
    – Athena Chamani-nezhad, 6
    – Mahna Zarei, 2 months
    – Mohammadreza Shahsavari, 8
    – Reza Ranjbar, 6
    – And numerous other children whose ages range from 5 to 12 years old

    This incident represents one of the deadliest attacks on an educational facility in recent Middle Eastern conflict, raising serious questions about targeting protocols and the protection of civilian infrastructure in warfare.

  • Fidan reveals failed Turkish attempts to stop Iran war

    Fidan reveals failed Turkish attempts to stop Iran war

    Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan has disclosed extensive diplomatic efforts by Ankara to prevent military confrontation between the United States and Iran, revealing that Tehran fundamentally misjudged Washington’s determination during critical negotiations.

    In a comprehensive briefing, Fidan detailed how Turkey initiated backchannel diplomacy following a historic January 27 phone conversation between President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and US President Donald Trump. During this exchange, Trump expressed support for Erdogan’s proposal to facilitate direct talks with newly elected Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian via teleconference—an offer Tehran ultimately declined.

    “Had the proposal for a trilateral meeting between the United States, Turkey and Mr. Pezeshkian been accepted by the Iranian side, it would have been a game-changing development,” Fidan stated, emphasizing that negotiations had reached a critical impasse requiring innovative diplomatic solutions.

    The minister described January’s security environment as particularly volatile, with Washington facing intense decision-making pressure regarding potential military action against Iran. “Those were truly dark days,” Fidan recalled. “Talk of war breaking out, of an imminent strike, was everywhere.”

    Three days after the Trump-Erdogan discussion, Turkey hosted Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Istanbul, where Turkish diplomats developed a novel negotiation architecture. The proposal involved separating four contentious issues into two categories: two matters for direct US-Iran discussion and two for resolution through regional mediation involving Turkey and other Middle Eastern nations.

    While American officials immediately accepted this framework, Iranian representatives requested consultation with senior leadership in Tehran. Turkish officials later learned that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei—recently deceased—opposed multilateral negotiations in Istanbul.

    Iran instead opted for bilateral talks in Oman, excluding regional powers Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, and Jordan from the process. By February 27, Fidan recognized the negotiations were stalling, though he believed extended dialogue might have produced agreements absent American military timetables and substantial Israeli pressure.

    Fidan suggested Iran’s misreading of Trump’s decision-making constraints ultimately weakened their diplomatic position. He expressed Ankara’s preference for limited military de-escalation rather than regime change, which would introduce “far more complex risks” regionally.

    The foreign minister indicated that Iran’s temporary leadership council—including President Pezeshkian—might present new opportunities for conflict resolution, describing the Iranian leader as someone Ankara could productively engage with on American concerns.

  • Israel ‘approved Lebanon attack’ hours before Hezbollah rocket fire

    Israel ‘approved Lebanon attack’ hours before Hezbollah rocket fire

    Tensions between Israel and Hezbollah have escalated dramatically following a series of preemptive military actions, bringing the region to the brink of renewed full-scale conflict. According to intelligence reports from Israel’s Channel 12 News, the Israeli security cabinet approved offensive operations against Lebanon on Sunday night after receiving intelligence indicating imminent Hezbollah attacks. This decision came shortly before Hezbollah launched rocket barrets into Israeli territory, which the group characterized as both retaliatory for recent targeted assassinations and preemptive against anticipated Israeli aggression.

    Sources close to Hezbollah leadership revealed to Middle East Eye that the militant organization detected preparations for significant Israeli military action and opted to strike first to disrupt attack plans and facilitate civilian evacuations from vulnerable areas. The group’s leadership viewed this move as strategically necessary to mitigate potential casualties from an expected Israeli assault.

    In response to Hezbollah’s rocket attacks, Israel has intensified aerial bombardments across southern Lebanon and Beirut’s southern suburbs, particularly targeting the Dahiyeh area. Lebanese health authorities report at least 61 fatalities and 335 injuries resulting from the ongoing military operations. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz issued stark warnings on social media platform X, declaring that “Hezbollah will pay a heavy price” and threatening further escalation.

    The conflict has triggered massive displacement, with approximately 65,000 Lebanese citizens registering at emergency shelters and an additional 10,000-20,000 believed displaced but not yet registered. Israel’s Northern Command has ordered widespread evacuations south of the Litani River, affecting an estimated 300,000 residents.

    In a significant political development, the Lebanese government has moved to ban Hezbollah’s military and security operations, with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam demanding the group surrender its “illegal” weapons. Meanwhile, Israeli military leadership, including Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, has emphasized that operations will continue until Hezbollah’s military capabilities are substantially degraded, asserting that the Lebanese government has failed to adequately disarm the organization.

    Rafi Milo, commander of Israel’s Northern Command, claims Hezbollah has “fallen into a strategic trap” as Israel implements attack plans developed over the past eight months. Israeli forces report striking approximately 250 targets across Lebanon and eliminating several senior Hezbollah commanders. Military officials have vowed to intensify operations in coming days regardless of Hezbollah’s actions, with potential targeting expanding to include major population centers such as Beirut, Tyre, and Sidon.

  • Forty nations meet in The Hague to discuss measures against Israel’s West Bank annexation

    Forty nations meet in The Hague to discuss measures against Israel’s West Bank annexation

    In a significant diplomatic mobilization, representatives from forty nations assembled in The Hague on Wednesday to formulate coordinated international responses to Israel’s policies in the occupied Palestinian territories. The conference, orchestrated by The Hague Group—a coalition established in January 2025 to address legal accountability for Israel’s actions—marked the largest gathering since the group’s inception.

    Convened against the backdrop of Israel’s controversial E1 settlement approval and recent governance overhaul in the West Bank, the meeting brought together diverse nations from Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America. Co-chaired by South Africa and Colombia, the assembly focused on translating political condemnation into concrete state-level actions regarding what participants characterized as de facto annexation of Palestinian lands.

    Participants unanimously reaffirmed commitment to fundamental international principles including the UN Charter, prohibition of territorial acquisition by force, and the right to self-determination. The conference yielded three specific measures for further development: enhanced accountability protocols for alleged international crimes including military service screening mechanisms, non-recognition policies through settlement goods import bans and corporate activity restrictions, and arms transfer halts with revised public contracting procedures.

    Colombian Vice-Minister of Multilateral Affairs Mauricio Jaramillo framed the discussion as addressing systemic impunity, stating Israel was ‘carrying out dispossession in plain sight.’ Palestinian Ambassador Ammar Hijazi welcomed the initiative as a rare operationalization of legal obligations, emphasizing that ‘the legal framework is not in dispute’ but implementation remains lacking.

    The meeting builds upon previous actions including The Hague Group’s July 2025 emergency summit in Bogotá, which demanded international sanctions against Israel. Recent months have seen several nations including Turkey, Spain, and Ireland implement independent sanctions aligned with the group’s objectives.

  • Turkey says Iranian missile over its airspace destroyed by Nato defences

    Turkey says Iranian missile over its airspace destroyed by Nato defences

    Turkish defense authorities confirmed on Wednesday that NATO air defense systems successfully intercepted and destroyed an Iranian ballistic missile transiting toward Turkish airspace. The incident represents a significant escalation in regional tensions and demonstrates NATO’s active defensive posture in the Eastern Mediterranean.

    According to official statements from Ankara, the projectile had traversed Iraqi and Syrian airspace before being neutralized by NATO’s integrated air and missile defense network. Ministry officials reported that missile fragments recovered in Hatay province’s Dortyol district confirmed the successful interception. The incident resulted in no casualties or property damage.

    Turkey’s defense ministry issued a stern warning following the interception, emphasizing the nation’s capability to protect its territorial integrity against any threat regardless of origin. While reaffirming Turkey’s commitment to regional stability, the statement explicitly reserved the right to respond to hostile actions against Turkish sovereignty.

    The incident occurs amid deteriorating regional security conditions following recent military actions against Iranian leadership. Iranian forces have employed a decentralized retaliation strategy, targeting Gulf nations with missile strikes that damaged infrastructure in Dubai and Saudi Arabia while disrupting Qatar’s LNG exports.

    Ankara’s diplomatic efforts to mediate between Washington and Tehran have collapsed following recent military actions. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan acknowledged the failure of mediation attempts despite proposing creative solutions to nuclear and ballistic missile disagreements. Fidan emphasized that any successful negotiations would require multilayered engagement given the unpredictable nature of current hostilities.

    Meanwhile, Turkey’s pro-Kurdish DEM Party criticized external intervention in Iran, arguing that regime change should emerge from internal popular will rather than foreign imposition. The party expressed concern that current military actions fail to address the aspirations of Iran’s diverse ethnic communities while acknowledging the Iranian regime’s history of human rights abuses.

  • Open University reverses UKLFI-influenced ‘ancient Palestine’ ban

    Open University reverses UKLFI-influenced ‘ancient Palestine’ ban

    The Open University (OU) has reversed its position on using the term ‘ancient Palestine’ in academic materials following significant scholarly backlash. This development comes after pressure from UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), who previously persuaded the university to abandon the terminology.

    In November 2025, UKLFI argued that references to ‘ancient Palestine’ in an OU humanities module could create a ‘hostile environment for Jewish and Israeli students’ and potentially violate equality legislation. The group claimed the term was historically inaccurate for periods before Roman Emperor Hadrian renamed the region ‘Syria Palaestina’ in the second century CE.

    Initially, the university’s Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences head Adrienne Scullion acquiesced to these demands in December, promising to eliminate the term from future materials and contextualize its use in existing ones. UKLFI celebrated this as a victory on their website.

    However, this decision triggered substantial academic opposition. Over 600 scholars and public figures, including prominent Israeli historians Ilan Pappe and Avi Shlaim alongside Palestinian historians Rashid Khalidi and Nur Masalha, signed an open letter demanding retraction. They argued the commitment threatened academic freedom, potentially violated the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, and represented complicity in ‘politically motivated attempts to erase Palestine from history.’

    The OU has now clarified its position through a spokesperson, stating academics remain ‘free to use the term ‘ancient Palestine’ where scholarly appropriate’ without mandatory contextual notes. The university explained its previous commitment to UKLFI applied only to a single module ‘scheduled for replacement.’

    This controversy occurs amidst broader patterns of institutional pressure. UKLFI has similarly targeted the British Museum and Encyclopaedia Britannica regarding Palestinian references, though the museum denied acting on UKLFI’s complaints. Academic experts maintain that ‘ancient Palestine’ is historically accurate, with OU classical studies lecturer Marchella Ward calling claims of its illegitimacy a ‘lie’ supporting ‘the erasure of Palestinians.’

  • At least 87 killed in US attack on Iranian warship off Sri Lanka’s coast

    At least 87 killed in US attack on Iranian warship off Sri Lanka’s coast

    A devastating naval confrontation has escalated tensions globally after a U.S. submarine torpedoed and sank an Iranian warship in international waters off the coast of Sri Lanka. The attack resulted in the deaths of at least 87 Iranian sailors, according to statements from the country’s deputy foreign minister on Wednesday.

    U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed American involvement during a Pentagon briefing, starkly declaring that ‘the Iranian navy rests at the bottom of the Persian Gulf’ while presenting visual evidence of the strike. This operation marks the first direct military engagement against Iran’s forces outside the Middle Eastern theater since hostilities began.

    The targeted vessel, the Iranian frigate Iris Dena, carried a complement of 180 personnel when it was struck. Sri Lankan naval authorities immediately launched search and rescue operations, managing to recover 32 survivors who were transported to Karapitiya Hospital in Galle for emergency medical treatment. Tragically, circulating images depicted emergency workers transferring deceased sailors to hospital mortuaries.

    Navy Commander Buddhika Sampath reported that rescue teams arrived to find only an oil slick where the warship had submerged, with no other vessels or aircraft observed in the vicinity. ‘We are hopeful we can rescue more people and will continue operations until we are sure,’ Sampath stated, noting that 61 sailors remain unaccounted for.

    The maritime tragedy occurred following a distress signal received by Sri Lankan forces from the Iranian ship. Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath informed parliament that the rescue mission was initiated promptly upon receiving the emergency communication.

    This naval engagement forms part of the fifth day of intensified military actions between the United States, Israel, and Iran, with reported civilian casualties exceeding 1,000 individuals—including at least 153 schoolgirls according to witness-confirmed local reports. In retaliation for the ongoing offensive, Tehran has launched strikes against Israeli and U.S. military installations throughout the Middle East, significantly raising regional tensions and international concerns about broader conflict escalation.

  • Armed Iranian Kurds weigh role in potential US-backed ground assault

    Armed Iranian Kurds weigh role in potential US-backed ground assault

    Amid escalating regional hostilities, the United States is reportedly evaluating strategic options to support Iranian Kurdish opposition groups based in Iraq for potential operations inside western Iran. Multiple US media outlets indicate the White House is considering backing these factions as part of broader efforts to pressure Tehran, though no final decisions have been confirmed.

    Several senior Kurdish officials from different opposition parties provided conflicting assessments to Middle East Eye regarding potential ground operations. A source within the Komala Party suggested it was the “right time” for fighters to return after 47 years in exile, while Siamand Moeini of the Kurdistan Free Life Party (PJAK) expressed uncertainty about going to war with Tehran. Amanj Zebaii of the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (PDKI) noted that “everything is possible” if Kurdish fighters entered Iran.

    The reporting coincides with intensified military actions along the Iran-Iraq border. US-Israeli airstrikes have targeted Revolutionary Guard facilities in multiple western Iranian cities including Mariwan, Urmiyeh, and Sanandaj. Simultaneously, Tehran has conducted drone strikes against Kurdish opposition camps in Iraq’s Kurdistan Region.

    Analysts suggest the US sees experienced Kurdish fighters as potential partners for any uprising in northwest Iran. Nicholas Heras of the Middle East Policy Council noted these fighters could serve as “key interlocutors” with US forces. However, significant trust issues remain from previous US disengagement from Kurdish partners in Syria.

    Military experts caution that without substantial air support and guarantees of political recognition, Kurdish forces would struggle to hold territory against Iranian counteroffensives. Former PJAK member Shamal Bishir warned that without proper backing, Kurdish groups could find themselves “exposed, holding territory without the means to secure it” if the Iranian state fragments without fully collapsing.

  • Israel orders civilians in half of southern Lebanon to leave

    Israel orders civilians in half of southern Lebanon to leave

    Israeli military authorities have issued a comprehensive evacuation directive for all residents residing south of Lebanon’s Litani River, signaling a significant escalation in cross-border hostilities. The order, communicated via social media by military spokesperson Avichay Adraee, affects hundreds of square kilometers and represents the most extensive displacement directive since fighting resumed earlier this week.

    The evacuation mandate coincides with confirmed Israeli military advancements into southern Lebanese territory, including the penetration of ground forces into the border town of Khiam approximately six kilometers from the Israeli frontier. This movement follows Tuesday’s authorization by Defense Minister Israel Katz for expanded military operations to secure additional positions in the contested region.

    Current hostilities mark the third day of renewed conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, triggered Monday when the Iranian-backed militia launched retaliatory strikes following the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Since then, Israel has conducted extensive aerial and ground operations across southern Lebanon, with particular focus on Beirut’s southern suburbs (Dahiyeh) and eastern regions.

    Lebanese health officials report at least 50 fatalities and 335 injuries from Israeli attacks since Monday, with overnight strikes claiming at least 11 additional lives. Medical infrastructure has sustained significant damage, including Bahman Hospital in Haret Hreik neighborhood which suffered collateral damage from a nearby building strike, injuring several healthcare workers.

    The conflict has expanded beyond traditional conflict zones, with an airstrike hitting a hotel in the predominantly Christian suburb of Hazmieh—marking the first Israeli attack near Beirut’s presidential palace and foreign embassy district. Meanwhile, Hezbollah has continued counterstrikes targeting Israeli military installations including the Haifa naval base and facilities near Ben Gurion Airport.

    Humanitarian concerns are mounting as Lebanon’s social affairs ministry reports approximately 65,000 displaced persons have registered at shelters, with an additional 10,000-20,000 estimated to be in transit or temporarily housed while awaiting formal registration.

  • ‘Isolated’ Iranian forces suspected of firing missile towards Turkey

    ‘Isolated’ Iranian forces suspected of firing missile towards Turkey

    A destabilizing incident occurred on Wednesday when a NATO missile defense system intercepted an Iranian ballistic missile heading near Turkish airspace. The event took place close to the southern city of Hatay, raising immediate concerns about regional escalation. According to sources speaking with Middle East Eye, the projectile may have been launched by isolated elements within Iran’s military, rather than representing a deliberate act by the central government in Tehran.

    This event is particularly notable as Iran had previously avoided Turkish airspace throughout its ongoing exchanges with the US and Israel. The missile was intercepted approximately 100 kilometers east of Turkey’s Incirlik Air Base, a strategic NATO asset, likely by alliance vessels stationed in the Eastern Mediterranean.

    Expert analysis suggests this incident may be a direct consequence of Iran’s ‘Mosaic’ doctrine—a decentralized military command structure designed for resilience. Oral Toga, an analyst at the Ankara-based Centre for Iranian Studies, explained that this system empowers regional commanders to operate autonomously, especially if communications with central command are severed. This decentralization, reportedly activated after recent strikes killed over 40 high-ranking Iranian officials, might have led to rogue elements firing without explicit orders.

    The situation was serious enough to prompt a diplomatic response. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan formally protested to his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, in a phone call, warning Tehran to prevent any actions that could widen the regional conflict. This diplomatic exchange underscores the delicate balance Turkey maintains as a NATO member hosting critical alliance assets, including an early-warning radar station, while navigating its complex relationship with Iran.

    Further compounding the situation, Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi had previously acknowledged in an interview that some military units had become ‘independent and somewhat isolated,’ operating on pre-issued general instructions rather than specific orders. This admission, coupled with a separate missile interception report in Syria’s Qamishli on the same day, suggests a pattern of potentially rogue operations that Tehran may not fully control.