标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Tallest building in Beijing is damaged after small airplane reportedly crashed into it

    Tallest building in Beijing is damaged after small airplane reportedly crashed into it

    On Friday, visual evidence posted to social media platforms sparked widespread concern after it suggested that debris from a small aircraft was found near CITIC Tower, Beijing’s tallest skyscraper, showing visible signs of exterior damage to the building.

    While the geolocation metadata and visual context of the shared photos and clips aligned with the iconic 528-meter structure’s location in Beijing’s Central Business District, independent third-party verification of the content’s authenticity has not been possible. The user-uploaded materials were also swiftly taken down from Chinese internet platforms shortly after being posted, limiting public access to the original imagery.

    Hong Kong-based English-language outlet South China Morning Post was the first major media outlet to publish a report claiming that the small aircraft had collided directly with the tower, which is commonly known by its local name China Zun. Published photos accompanying the early report showed what observers identified as a broken section of glass or a punctured hole on one of the skyscraper’s facades.

    Multiple witness accounts confirmed a large-scale emergency response at the scene: significant numbers of law enforcement officers, fire trucks, and ambulances were deployed to the area outside the supertall building, blocking off nearby access points as first responders assessed the situation.

    As of the latest updates, no official public statement has been released by Chinese national or municipal authorities regarding the nature, cause, or casualty toll of the incident. Investigations into what exactly occurred near the iconic Central Business District landmark are still ongoing, with no official confirmation of a crash available to the public.

  • Mediators worked through threats and strikes to broker the US-Iran deal, and challenges remain

    Mediators worked through threats and strikes to broker the US-Iran deal, and challenges remain

    On June 11, as tit-for-tat air strikes between the United States and Iran pushed the two nations to the brink of a catastrophic all-out war, a Qatari mediation jet sat grounded on a Tehran tarmac – its diplomatic passengers trapped mid-mission after hours of grueling overnight negotiations. This quiet, high-stakes standstill captures the chaotic, rollercoaster nature of the cross-regional diplomatic push led by Pakistan and Qatar that ultimately produced last week’s interim deal to end a conflict that has roiled Middle East security and sent shockwaves through the global economy.

    This exclusive behind-the-scenes account of the diplomacy leading to the truce is drawn from interviews conducted by the Associated Press with three senior Pakistani officials, two regional diplomatic sources and a diplomat directly briefed on the closed-door talks, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive negotiations. When approached for comment on Pakistan’s mediation role, the country’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs directed AP to prior public statements, noting it would continue facilitating talks between the two sides. The White House declined to comment, and representatives for Qatar and Iran did not respond to requests for comment.

    The most dramatic turning point came on that same June day, when then-US President Donald Trump reignited panic with a public threat of immediate large-scale military action, claiming the US would strike Iran “VERY HARD TONIGHT” and seize full control of Tehran’s oil and gas sector. With conflict on the cusp, regional mediators launched an urgent last-ditch effort to convince Trump to give diplomatic talks more time. According to the briefed diplomat, Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani spoke directly to Trump, urging him to delay planned strikes after confirming a tentative agreement was within reach. The gambit succeeded: Trump announced he was calling off the planned attacks, and just days later, Washington and Tehran signed the interim accord ending the hostilities that erupted after a February joint US-Israeli strike on Iran.

    The deal’s core terms center on reopening the Strait of Hormuz – the critical global oil and gas chokepoint Iran closed at the conflict’s opening – and lifting a US blockade to resume Iranian oil exports. It also sets a 60-day deadline to negotiate a wider, permanent agreement addressing Iran’s disputed nuclear program, with additional economic relief for Tehran tied to progress on that front.

    Unlike prior US-Iran talks, which relied on mediation from Oman and Qatar, Pakistan emerged as the lead facilitator early in the conflict after Iran harshly criticized Gulf states, many of which host US military forces. Though Pakistan has rarely led high-stakes international mediation, its geographic border with Iran and longstanding positive ties with both Tehran and Washington positioned it uniquely for the role. Negotiators used a secure, encrypted communications network to shuttle proposals between US and Iranian officials, with a Pakistani official confirming all staff were warned that any leak could carry a life sentence. Pakistan’s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, played a particularly central role, maintaining a direct communication line with Trump, officials confirmed.

    Charles Lyons-Jones, a former Australian diplomat who served in Pakistan and now works as a research fellow at the Lowy Institute, noted: “As the US-Iran war dragged on and both sides grew eager to reach a settlement, Munir’s unique cross-border connections in both Washington and Tehran became an invaluable asset.” A preliminary truce was reached in April, just weeks after the conflict began, and days later, US and Iranian delegations held their first high-level face-to-face talks in years in Islamabad. Trump later commented of the ceasefire: “I wouldn’t have really been in favor of it, but we did it as a favor to Pakistan, who are terrific people.”

    Within weeks, however, the fragile ceasefire began to fray, and Qatar stepped back into the breach. Qatar had initially refused to mediate after facing criticism from Iran, but by mid-May, after strikes targeting the Gulf nation ceased, both US and Iranian officials approached Doha to request help breaking the deadlock, the diplomat said. Qatar brought significant recent mediation experience to the table, having played a central role alongside Egypt in negotiating the Gaza ceasefire and the release of Israeli hostages. Working in lockstep with Pakistan, Qatari officials began making quiet, unannounced trips to Tehran to continue talks.

    Meanwhile, Egypt’s intelligence chief Hassan Rashad opened a direct communication channel with Gen. Ahmad Vahidi, head of Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard and a close confidant of Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, who has remained in deep hiding since the conflict began. Two regional officials confirmed that Egypt and Turkey also played a critical behind-the-scenes role in discouraging a number of Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, from joining the US-led coalition against Iran.

    Key compromises shaped the final interim text: Iran initially sought to delay any discussion of its highly enriched uranium stockpile, but mediators persuaded Tehran to include a commitment to reduce the stockpile in exchange for US promises to waive oil export sanctions and gradually unfreeze billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets. On financial relief, Iran initially demanded no less than $500 billion in war reparations, but eventually agreed to a pledge of $300 billion in pledged investment tied to a final permanent agreement – though it remains unclear which nations will contribute that funding.

    Throughout the negotiations, escalating violence in Lebanon repeatedly threatened to derail the entire process. Tehran-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah launched missile attacks on Israel in retaliation for the initial strike on Iran, prompting a devastating Israeli air campaign and ground invasion of southern Lebanon. Iran made a Lebanon ceasefire a non-negotiable condition of any final deal, a stance opposed by Israel and initially by the US, but language addressing the conflict was ultimately added to the draft agreement.

    On June 7, as Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsen Naqvi was in Tehran delivering a message to Khamenei urging him to sign off on the deal, Israel carried out a strike on Beirut. Iran retaliated with missile strikes against Israel, setting off a new round of tit-for-tat US-Iran strikes that culminated in the June 11 grounding of the Qatari mediation jet. After that crisis was averted, negotiations moved forward rapidly: Trump announced on June 13 that a deal would be signed the following day, and Qatari mediators returned to Tehran for 17 hours of last-minute intensive talks. Just as the parties neared a final agreement, Israel carried out a second strike on Beirut on June 14, crossing a red line Iran had explicitly drawn. Qatari mediators worked frantically to convince Iranian leaders that launching new retaliatory strikes “would only play into the hands of the deal’s opponents,” the diplomat said. Disuading Iran from immediate retaliation, they added, was what ultimately “got the deal over the line.” At Iran’s insistence, an explicit pledge to uphold Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity was added to the final memorandum, with Tehran demanding a full Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory – a step Israel has so far refused to take. The interim Memorandum of Understanding was finally signed on June 17.

    Negotiations for a permanent final agreement, scheduled to conclude by August, have already gotten underway in Switzerland after a brief delay, once again caused by ongoing violence in Lebanon. The diplomat explained that Iran has framed the Lebanon ceasefire as its top priority, noting: “Iran ‘viewed (the Lebanon ceasefire) as point number one, and if you can’t abide by point number one, then why should we discuss two, three, four?’” After the US and Iran brokered a new temporary truce between Israel and Hezbollah, the Swiss talks resumed on Sunday, with an early focus on creating a permanent monitoring mechanism to cement the Lebanese ceasefire. While Trump and Iranian officials have continued to exchange sharp public rhetoric – and Iran briefly paused the Swiss talks after what it called an insulting message from Trump – the diplomat described the current negotiating atmosphere as “quite positive,” noting that US and Iranian delegates have even shared coffee together during breaks in discussions.

    The situation remains fragile, with lingering threats of new hostilities both in Lebanon and around the Strait of Hormuz, but the successful brokering of the interim deal marks a rare breakthrough in decades of hostile relations between Washington and Tehran.

  • Duckett leads counterattack as England reaches 73-1 at tea in reply to New Zealand’s 438

    Duckett leads counterattack as England reaches 73-1 at tea in reply to New Zealand’s 438

    NOTTINGHAM, England – The third and final Test of England’s summer series against New Zealand at Trent Bridge delivered a dramatic second day on Friday, turning the tide of momentum after the Kiwis had dominated the opening session. A blistering 317-run opening partnership between Tom Latham and Devon Conway on Day One had left the home side reeling, with New Zealand posting a mammoth first-innings total of 438 before being bowled out shortly after lunch on Day Two. What followed was a disciplined England fightback, headlined by a major career milestone for all-rounder captain Ben Stokes and a rapid counterattack from opener Ben Duckett heading into the tea break.

    On a sweltering afternoon where temperatures peaked at 34 degrees Celsius (93 Fahrenheit), Stokes picked up where England’s bowlers left off on Thursday evening, when the side had clawed back four late New Zealand wickets to stem the visitors’ momentum. The captain claimed the first wicket of the day, forcing Daryl Mitchell to edge a catch behind to wicketkeeper Jamie Smith for 11 runs. He followed that up by dismissing Will O’Rourke, who sliced a catch to Emilio Gay at point, before notching his long-awaited 250th Test wicket. The milestone came via a fiery bouncer to Mitchell Santner, who feathered a catch to Jacob Bethell in the gully. Santner immediately called for a Decision Review System (DRS) challenge, but television replays confirmed the ball had brushed his glove, upholding the on-field umpire’s decision.

    Spinner Shoaib Bashir picked up two more wickets for the home side: he secured a return catch at the second attempt to remove Nathan Smith for 6, then dismissed Tom Blundell via lbw on review after the New Zealand wicketkeeper missed a reverse sweep. Jofra Archer wrapped up the innings by trapping Ben Sears lbw for a duck, leaving New Zealand all out for 438. Stokes finished with match figures of 4 for 70, pushing him to ninth place on England’s all-time list of leading Test wicket-takers. The 35-year-old’s standout performance comes just one week after he was recalled to the side alongside fast bowler Gus Atkinson, following their suspension from the second Test for disciplinary reasons.

    With New Zealand’s innings closed, England stepped out to bat needing to respond to the huge total, and got off to a flying start despite an early setback. Opener Emilio Gay became England’s only wicket to fall before tea, caught down the leg side by Blundell off O’Rourke’s bowling without scoring a run. That brought Duckett to the crease, who entered the Test having struggled for runs throughout 2024. The left-hander was gifted a second chance early on, when New Zealand third slip Henry Nicholls dropped a catch off Nathan Smith’s bowling when Duckett had only scored 8 runs. He made the visitors pay immediately, playing with characteristic aggression to reach an unbeaten 52 off just 37 balls by the tea interval. At the other end, debutant batter Jacob Bethell was also not out on 16, leaving England 73 for 1 from 14 overs at the break, with the home side well placed to build on its early fightback. Heading into the weekend, the three-Test series remains level at 1-1, with the winner of this final match set to claim series bragging rights.

  • Heavy rain pounds western Japan as 2 tropical storms approach

    Heavy rain pounds western Japan as 2 tropical storms approach

    TOKYO – A volatile combination of a stalled seasonal rain front and two oncoming tropical systems has unleashed catastrophic flooding across broad swathes of western Japan, leaving one person injured and causing widespread disruption to infrastructure just as the system tracks toward the Tokyo metro area.

    The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) confirmed Friday afternoon that Tropical Storm Mekkhala was churning northeastward off the western shoreline of Amami, Japan’s remote southern island. A second storm, Higos, is tracking close on Mekkhala’s heels, and forecasters project both systems will reach the Tokyo region by Saturday, bringing with them sustained, intense rainfall that threatens to worsen already dangerous conditions.

    Local reports from Japan’s national public broadcaster NHK detailed one early casualty Friday: a man was hospitalized after falling into a rushing, swollen waterway in Nara Prefecture. Visual footage from Kyoto captured the iconic Kamo River transformed into a surging channel of murky floodwater, prompting emergency officials to roll out flood warnings across multiple districts in Kyoto, Osaka and other neighboring prefectures in western Japan.

    As of Friday evening, Japan’s Fire and Disaster Management Agency recorded more than 30 private residences across Nara and Hiroshima that have been fully or partially inundated by rising floodwaters. Beyond property damage, the relentless downpour has snarled regional transportation networks, forcing the suspension of multiple local train routes and prompting airlines to cancel or delay dozens of flights serving the affected region.

  • South Korean court sentences ex-first lady Kim to 7 years for taking luxury gifts tied to favors

    South Korean court sentences ex-first lady Kim to 7 years for taking luxury gifts tied to favors

    In a landmark ruling that caps months of high-profile political fallout following the ouster of former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, Seoul Central District Court has sentenced ex-first lady Kim Keon Hee to seven years in prison after convicting her on multiple charges of bribery and influence peddling. Friday’s verdict adds a second major prison term to Kim’s ongoing legal troubles, coming several months after an appellate court handed her a four-year sentence in a separate case involving gifts from the Unification Church and illicit gains from a stock manipulation scheme. In delivering the judgment, presiding Judge Jo Soon-pyo emphasized the unique ethical obligations that come with being a first spouse, noting that a president’s partner is expected to maintain extraordinary levels of self-discipline and public accountability. “Nevertheless, defendant Kim Keon Hee neglected that social responsibility and repeatedly accepted valuables by exploiting her influence as a means of brokering favors,” Judge Jo stated. Alongside the prison sentence, the court ordered the full confiscation of all luxury gifts Kim was found to have received, including a high-value Van Cleef & Arpels diamond necklace, a Tiffany & Co. brooch, a Dior handbag, a storage case for a gold turtle figurine, and a celebrated painting by renowned Korean artist Lee Ufan. Clad in a gray business suit and white face mask, Kim bowed her head silently throughout the reading of the verdict. She has long acknowledged accepting the items in question, but has consistently denied any connection between the gifts and promises of political favor. Kim has remained in ongoing litigation across several separate cases since her arrest in August 2025, and her legal team has not yet issued a public statement on whether they will challenge Friday’s ruling. This conviction is the latest development in a sweeping political shakeup that reshaped South Korea’s leadership earlier this year. Yoon Suk Yeol, a conservative incumbent, was removed from office in April 2025, just months after he was impeached following his controversial and short-lived declaration of martial law in December 2024. The move came amid a bitter political standoff with the liberal opposition, which held a legislative majority and had blocked most of Yoon’s policy agenda during his term. Yoon was arrested in July 2025 and is currently facing trial across multiple criminal cases. He has already appealed a life sentence for rebellion charges connected to the martial law declaration, as well as a separate 30-year prison term for allegations that he ordered unauthorized drone flights over North Korea’s capital Pyongyang to stoke cross-border tensions and justify his domestic power grab. After winning a snap presidential election to replace Yoon, liberal President Lee Jae Myung authorized a series of wide-ranging investigations into the martial law declaration and a host of other allegations against Yoon, his administration, and his spouse. The bribery charges that led to Friday’s conviction were brought by a special prosecutor in December. The most high-profile count centers on a 2022 bribe: Kim was found guilty of accepting the Van Cleef & Arpels necklace and other luxury goods totaling 138 million won (equivalent to roughly $90,000) from Lee Bong-kwan, chairman of Seohee Construction, in exchange for using her influence to secure a government position for Lee’s son-in-law. Lee Bong-kwan also received a one-year prison sentence in Friday’s ruling, which has been suspended for two years. Beyond the construction chairman’s gifts, the court convicted Kim on four additional bribery counts: accepting a luxury watch from Seo Seong-bin, a business owner seeking government backing for his robotic dog enterprise; a Dior handbag and other gifts from Pastor Choi Jae-yong, who wanted a spot on a government-funded civilian diplomatic delegation; a gold turtle figurine and traditional Korean painting from Lee Bae-yong, a former head of the National Education Commission who lobbied for Kim’s informal policy influence; and the 140 million won ($90,900) Lee Ufan painting from Kim Sang-min, a former senior prosecutor who sought the ruling conservative party’s nomination for the 2024 legislative elections. All other co-defendants received lenient penalties: Seo Seong-bin and Lee Bae-yong were given suspended prison sentences, while Choi Jae-yong was ordered to pay an 8 million won ($5,200) fine.

  • Australia plans to strengthen laws banning children from social media

    Australia plans to strengthen laws banning children from social media

    Australia’s federal government is prioritizing legislative reforms to toughen a landmark national ban on social media use for children under 16, after mounting data and expert analysis confirmed the original policy has failed to block underage users from major platforms, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has confirmed.

    First implemented last December 10, Australia’s ban was a global first — no other country had previously codified an age-based prohibition on under-16s holding social media accounts on major platforms including Meta-owned Facebook and Instagram, Alphabet’s YouTube, and ByteDance’s TikTok. But in the seven months since the rule took effect, overwhelming evidence has shown the policy has fallen far short of its goals. Leading the push for stronger powers, Australia’s top online safety regulator eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has already signaled she is considering taking major platforms to court for failing to meet their obligations under the current law.

    Speaking to Parliament Thursday, Albanese confirmed his administration is actively reviewing all options to strengthen the existing framework. “We’re working on that as a priority because this is something that other generations didn’t have to deal with, which is why it is complex,” he told lawmakers. In a follow-up interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corp. Friday, Albanese added that the government is assessing whether existing laws are robust enough, and whether Inman Grant’s office currently has full authority to enforce the ban effectively.

    Independent data backs up claims that the original ban is not working. Internal data released by the eSafety office in March found that 70 percent of underage Australian children still maintain active accounts on major platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok. A separate study published Wednesday in the *British Medical Journal* went further, finding that 85 percent of Australian teens aged 12 to 17 continue to access platforms they are barred from using under current law.

    Lisa Given, an information sciences expert at Melbourne’s RMIT University, told the Associated Press that the government’s push for reform is a direct response to this overwhelming evidence of failure. “I do think it’s failing,” Given said. “Many kids in the media have reported that they also think that this is really a failed exercise.”

    The *Sydney Morning Herald* reported in early June that Inman Grant told a private interview that she currently lacks “potent powers” to enforce the ban, noting that “a regulator is only as good as the tools and the resources that they are given.” The AP requested comment from Inman Grant’s office Friday to verify the reporting, but did not receive an immediate response.

    Given explained that the current regulation puts the onus on platforms to take “reasonable steps” to remove underage accounts, but the law does not clearly define what qualifies as reasonable steps. If platforms fail to comply, they can face maximum fines of 49.5 million Australian dollars, equal to roughly $34 million U.S. — but enforcement has stalled without clear regulatory authority. “Either the eSafety Commissioner needs more powers or we’ve got to have some other approach to enforcement,” Given said, adding that courts will likely need to ultimately clarify what the law requires of platforms.

    Albanese confirmed that alongside strengthening the under-16 ban, the government will move forward with a broader digital duty of care law, which would hold social media companies legally accountable for foreseeable harms to users caused by platform content and algorithmic recommendation systems.

    Australia’s push to toughen age-based social media restrictions is part of a growing global trend. Just last week, the United Kingdom announced its own plans to ban children under 16 from most major social media platforms, framing the rule as a necessary protection for young people against harmful online content and excessive screen time. Canada, Brazil and Indonesia have already introduced similar age-based legislation or restrictions, while France, Spain, Denmark, Thailand and South Korea are all currently developing or studying comparable regulations to limit children’s social media access.

  • Asia stock markets slide as tech shares slump

    Asia stock markets slide as tech shares slump

    A widespread sell-off across the technology sector dragged Asian stock markets into steep negative territory on Friday, as investors grew increasingly wary that the multi-month rally in tech shares had outpaced realistic fundamentals.

    The downturn rippled across the region, starting with severe declines in South Korea’s benchmark Kospi index. An 8% intraday drop triggered the market’s automatic circuit breaker mechanism, designed to stem panic-driven trading, halting all transactions for 20 minutes. By the closing bell, the index had settled 5.8% down. This marked the third time this week alone the circuit breaker has been activated, and the fifth such event in 2026, highlighting the extreme volatility that has gripped South Korean equity markets in recent months.

    Friday’s sell-off followed sharp declines in major U.S. tech stocks the previous session. Apple saw its share price plummet 6% on Thursday — its largest single-day drop in over 12 months — after the company announced it would hike prices for its iPad and MacBook product lines to offset skyrocketing computer chip manufacturing costs. Microsoft also recorded losses after it revealed price increases for its Xbox gaming consoles, blaming elevated component costs. These moves stoked broader market fears that rising input costs will dampen consumer demand for tech devices, which could in turn cool demand for semiconductors, undoing much of the recent growth the chip sector has enjoyed amid the AI boom.

    Japan’s Nikkei 225 was not spared from the downturn, closing 4% lower, led by a 12.5% plunge in shares of SoftBank, the Japanese investment giant that has positioned itself as a leading backer of AI startups and infrastructure. Major regional benchmarks in Taiwan and mainland China also posted double-digit percentage declines for the session, deepening the regional market rout.

    Market analysts point to two core drivers of the correction: escalating input costs across the tech sector and growing skepticism over lofty valuations for AI-focused companies. David Makaryan, senior partner at global investment firm Alpha Pacific Group, noted that many traders are moving to lock in profits after months of steady gains, while the broader market is reassessing how much growth AI investment will actually deliver. “The long term investment case for AI remains compelling, but investors are becoming far more selective about which companies can justify the valuations the market has assigned to them,” Makaryan explained.

    Concerns are also growing over the hundreds of billions of dollars that large tech firms have earmarked for AI infrastructure buildout this year. Raymond Woo, an analyst with Kyoto University Innovation Capital, pointed out that the steep costs of commercializing new AI tools are already being passed downstream to consumers. This dynamic “naturally raises questions” about whether consumer demand will scale fast enough to match the massive current investment in AI, and whether current tech stock valuations are rooted in realistic growth projections, Woo said.

  • Quantum firms shun entanglement as Trump vows to outrun China

    Quantum firms shun entanglement as Trump vows to outrun China

    As the United States and China deepen their competitive standoff over cutting-edge quantum technology, private sector players across the global quantum ecosystem are rapidly reshaping their operational models to avoid being swept up in geopolitical crossfire. Tactics range from building localized domestic manufacturing hubs to splitting regional operations into independent units that can serve non-Western markets without triggering regulatory penalties.

    While physicists in laboratories race to master quantum entanglement – the bizarre physical phenomenon that binds particles across unlimited distances – corporate leaders in boardrooms are working overtime to avoid a far messier entanglement: the geopolitical split between Washington and Beijing.

    The most recent major escalation came this week, when US President Donald Trump signed an executive order mandating that federal agencies reinforce domestic quantum supply chains and manufacturing capacity, update the country’s national quantum development strategy, and beef up counterintelligence protections for the emerging technology. The order frames international competitors, specifically labeled adversarial nations, as direct threats to America’s goal of retaining global quantum leadership.

    Against this shifting regulatory and geopolitical backdrop, quantum firms are adopting vastly different strategies based on their geographic positioning. US-headquartered companies are prioritizing local customers and localized supply chains, while European and British industry players are positioning themselves to capture market share in both allied and non-aligned nations. For Taiwanese companies, stuck between the world’s two largest superpowers, the priority is to build sovereign domestic quantum capabilities before tightening export controls close off the window for development entirely.

    Industry leaders gathered at the 2026 Commercializing Quantum Global conference in London, hosted by Economist Enterprise, shared their adaptive strategies with Asia Times on the event’s sidelines. Participants included executives from Quantum Computing Inc. (QCI), Infleqtion, and ORCA Computing, alongside a board advisor from major manufacturing giant Foxconn.

    Yuping Huang, chairman and CEO of publicly traded US quantum photonics firm QCI, explained that his company has prioritized building out domestic US manufacturing to mitigate geopolitical risk. “Right now, we are not subject to export control restrictions, but that could change. When there are restrictions, we just have to follow the rules,” Huang said in the interview. “Quantum technology is open. We should use the open approach to studying and commercializing quantum. The quantum industry can benefit from reduced interference from geopolitical factors.”

    QCI is currently expanding a thin-film lithium niobate foundry in Tempe, Arizona, to produce both active and passive photonic chips, part of a planned domestic manufacturing footprint that spans multiple US states. When asked about plans to launch a separate overseas division for non-Western markets, Huang noted the company has not yet considered that structure. A US citizen who graduated from the University of Science and Technology of China in 2004 before earning his PhD in quantum physics from Michigan State University, Huang founded quantum photonics startup QPhoton in 2020 before merging it with QCI in 2022, and he remains the firm’s largest single shareholder.

    For Infleqtion, a US-based neutral atom quantum technology firm, the strategy centers on clear alignment with allied security frameworks. Ryan Hanley, the company’s UK chief technology officer, told the outlet that Infleqtion only partners with allied nations, aligned with shared national security values, and is well integrated into the AUKUS security partnership between Australia, the UK, and the US. He acknowledged that China boasts one of the world’s largest state-backed quantum investment programs and can scale technology rapidly thanks to its concentrated strategic focus, but Infleqtion has opted to align exclusively with allied blocs rather than attempt to straddle both sides of the rivalry.

    To balance market access and regulatory compliance, Hanley added that the firm has structured its UK and US operations as fully independent entities. This split structure allows products developed in the UK to be sold to a wider range of markets than those permitted under US export control rules. “That is a conscious business decision to do things separately, such that we can serve different parts of the market because of that export control,” he explained.

    The trend of US export restrictions on quantum technology has built incrementally over the past two years. During the Biden administration, Washington moved to cut off China’s access to advanced quantum tools, implementing export controls on quantum computers, critical components and related software in September 2024, followed by a ban on most US investments in China’s quantum sector that took effect in January 2025. In March 2025, the Trump administration added roughly 80 companies to its US export blacklist, more than 50 of which are Chinese, including six subsidiaries of Inspur Group that were accused of acquiring US technologies to advance military AI and quantum development. On May 21, 2026, the administration announced $2 billion in federal incentives through the CHIPS and Science Act for nine domestic quantum companies, including $1 billion for IBM to build a quantum-grade superconducting wafer foundry and $375 million for GlobalFoundries to establish a domestic quantum manufacturing facility.

    Speaking at the London conference, Ann Dunkin, a distinguished professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology and former chief information officer at the US Department of Energy, argued that the US faces structural challenges in the quantum race that go far beyond a lack of funding. “The US is very good at innovation, but not scaling things, and so we need to get in early to scale, or China will outpace us,” she said. “China is very good at scaling things, and you have seen industries where we have lost that battle.”

    Dunkin added that Western control of quantum manufacturing capacity is a critical strategic priority: “We want to be in a position where if there are going to be a handful of global foundries, we want the West to have that handful, or at least some of that handful. From a geopolitical standpoint, we run the risk otherwise of the same problem we have right now in many technologies, where we are dependent upon China for high-tech goods.”

    Multilateral cooperation among Western aligned nations has already formalized in recent years. In July 2024, the US and nine allied nations launched the Quantum Development Group (QDG) to coordinate quantum policy and build resilient cross-border supply chains. The bloc expanded to 13 members during its fourth meeting in Tokyo in September 2025, and at its fifth meeting in London in March 2026, members committed to deeper collaboration on research security, supply chain resilience, and global quantum standards development. Current QDG members include Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the US.

    Manjari Chandran-Ramesh, a partner at global deep-tech investment firm Amadeus Capital, expressed hope that geopolitical rivalry would remain background noise rather than a permanent barrier to industry progress, pointing to the QDG as proof that multilateral quantum cooperation remains achievable. She noted that European firms are uniquely positioned to benefit from the US-China split, thanks to robust research and manufacturing clusters across the continent that can support multiple qubit technology modalities. The existing foundry ecosystem anchored by institutions like Belgium’s imec, France’s CEA-Leti, and Finland’s VTT gives Europe the flexibility to serve a wide range of quantum hardware developers across different technology paths, she added.

    London-based photonic quantum computing firm ORCA Computing embodies the European open market approach. Co-founder and CEO Richard Murray noted that US policy has increasingly prioritized domestic firms and focused investment on homegrown players, while the UK’s framework is far more open to global participation. “The UK’s approach is better because it’s much more open,” Murray said. “The UK’s target is to attract globally leading quantum companies to build their systems in the UK, as well as supporting UK companies.”

    ORCA positions itself as a competitive global player in this open market, with existing customers spanning allied nations across Europe, North America, and Asia, including the UK Ministry of Defense, the UK National Quantum Computing Center, Poland’s Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center, and Montana State University in the US. The firm recently notched a major commercial milestone, deploying its PT-2 photonic quantum system at a major Japanese enterprise in partnership with trading house Toyota Tsusho. The company calls the installation the world’s first commercial deployment of a quantum computer in a live enterprise setting; the PT-2 fits in standard 19-inch server racks, requires no specialized cryogenic cooling, and was fully deployed in less than a week.

    While the US builds restrictive regulatory frameworks to limit Chinese quantum progress, Beijing is investing heavily to build out a fully domestic quantum ecosystem, from academic research to commercial deployment. Guo Guoping, a professor at the University of Science and Technology of China and secretary-general of the Chinese Computer Federation’s quantum computing committee, noted last year that tightened export controls on quantum chips and semiconductor manufacturing equipment from the US and Netherlands have made full indigenous development of the entire quantum technology chain a core strategic necessity for China.

    No region faces a more complicated balancing act than Taiwan, which is cut off from China’s quantum ecosystem by political tensions and excluded from the QDG’s allied framework, forcing it to pursue quantum development largely independently. Ching-Ray Chang, a board member at Taiwan-based manufacturing giant Hon Hai Precision Industry (better known as Foxconn) and director of the quantum information center at Taiwan’s Chung Yuan Christian University, said the geopolitical context for quantum development is fundamentally different from the era when Taiwan built its world-leading semiconductor industry.

    “Fifty years ago, when Taiwan started to make semiconductors, there was no classification at all. Everybody shared the knowledge with each other. But right now, even though you can pay money, sometimes you cannot get any technology transfer,” Chang explained. “Every country is trying to build its own quantum technology because this is some kind of sovereignty issue. You need to develop and control many things yourself; you cannot rely on others. Not only the patents, but also the production.”

    Chang acknowledged that Taiwan was late to enter the quantum race, as all of its top talent, capital, and resources remained tied to its dominant semiconductor industry, but the Taiwanese government and major local firms including Foxconn have already begun pouring investment into the sector. While Foxconn remains in an early development stage relative to global leaders, the firm plans to launch a prototype quantum computer as early as 2027.

  • Myanmar torches $600 million in seized heroin, meth and other drugs

    Myanmar torches $600 million in seized heroin, meth and other drugs

    YANGON, Myanmar – On Friday, towering plumes of black smoke rose over the outskirts of Myanmar’s most populous city as authorities incinerated more than 50 tons of seized illicit narcotics to mark the United Nations’ International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking. The destroyed drugs, which included heroin, opium, ketamine, methamphetamine, marijuana and crystal meth, carried a combined street value of roughly $600 million across all destruction events held nationwide. Of that total, $321 million worth of 31 distinct types of narcotics were burned at the Yangon site alone, according to Police Lieutenant Colonel Aung Myat Soe of Yangon’s Anti-Narcotics Police Force. Speaking to reporters at the bus station compound on Yangon’s edge where the burning took place, Aung Myat Soe noted that the 2024 total street value of destroyed drugs is more than double the amount destroyed in 2023. Parallel drug destruction ceremonies were also hosted in Mandalay and Taunggyi, the capital of eastern Myanmar’s Shan State – regions located much closer to the country’s major drug production hubs.

    Myanmar has long grappled with large-scale illicit drug production, a crisis deeply tied to decades of political instability and economic uncertainty rooted in ongoing armed conflict across the country. For generations, the nation has ranked among the world’s top producers of heroin and methamphetamine, and it remains a primary supplier of illegal narcotics to markets across East and Southeast Asia, even after repeated government crackdown attempts.

    Drug production has accelerated sharply since the 2021 military coup that ousted the democratically elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi, experts confirm. The coup plunged the country into a widespread civil war that pits the military-run State Administration Council against pro-democracy opposition forces and a coalition of ethnic armed organizations, most of which control large swathes of territory outside central government rule. In early 2024, the military government announced that it had carried out the largest illicit drug seizure in Myanmar’s recorded history, confiscating vast amounts of narcotics and drug manufacturing equipment from 12 production sites during raids across northern Shan State.

    The military government asserts that ethnic militias operating in contested border regions rely on the illegal drug trade to fund their insurgencies against state forces, and have little incentive to join national peace negotiations because of the massive profits the trade generates. While the military’s claim holds true for many armed groups, it is not universal: some anti-government factions have also carried out their own anti-narcotics operations. The Ta’ang National Liberation Army (TNLA), an ethnic armed group that seized large sections of northern Shan State during early civil war offensives before agreeing to a ceasefire with the military in October 2023, announced Thursday it would destroy approximately $5.5 million worth of seized narcotics in areas under its control. The 2024 general election held earlier this year, which the military won by a landslide, was widely dismissed by international observers as neither free nor fair, given that all major opposition groups were barred from participating and widespread voter intimidation was reported.

  • Serena Williams to face 20-year-old Maya Joint of Australia in Wimbledon opening round

    Serena Williams to face 20-year-old Maya Joint of Australia in Wimbledon opening round

    As the 2025 Wimbledon Championships prepare to kick off Monday, one of the greatest tennis players in history is preparing to step back onto the iconic grass courts of the All England Club for her first singles match in nearly four years. Serena Williams, the 42-year-old seven-time Wimbledon singles champion, secured a wild-card entry to the prestigious Grand Slam, drawing an opponent less than half her age for the opening round: 20-year-old Australian rising star Maya Joint. The comeback will not stop at singles for Williams, either; she will also pair with her older sister Venus, who celebrated her 46th birthday just last week, for the doubles draw.

    Williams’ gradual return to competitive tennis began with two low-stakes doubles warmup matches, but the comeback gained mainstream attention Sunday when the All England Club formally confirmed her wildcard singles entry. Joint, currently ranked 53rd in the WTA singles rankings, is no stranger to the Wimbledon big stage: she made her debut at the tournament last year, though she fell in the opening round to Russia’s Liudmila Samsonova in straight sets, 6-3, 6-2.

    Williams has not competed in a top-level singles match since a third-round exit against Australia’s Ajla Tomljanovic at the 2022 U.S. Open. In the emotional post-match press conference following that defeat, Williams declined to frame the moment as a retirement, instead saying she was “evolving” away from professional tennis to focus on other parts of her life. She welcomed her second daughter in 2023, and has made only limited appearances on tour in the years since.

    Williams’ last trip to Wimbledon came in 2022, when she suffered a surprise opening-round loss to then-world No. 115 Harmony Tan. Beyond Williams’ historic comeback, this year’s tournament carries other notable storylines: Italian star Jannik Sinner, the defending men’s singles champion, enters the draw as the world No. 1 and top men’s seed, while Belarus’ Aryna Sabalenka claims the top seed in the women’s draw. Wimbledon follows standard ATP and WTA ranking protocols to determine its seedings.

    One of the tournament’s most decorated active players, seven-time champion Novak Djokovic, is seeded seventh this year after a season of mixed results. Fans will be missing one of the top contenders, however: two-time former champion Carlos Alcaraz, who fell to Sinner in last year’s 2024 Wimbledon final, has been forced to withdraw from the 2025 tournament due to a lingering wrist injury.