标签： Asia

In a dramatic audio address broadcast from undisclosed locations in India, Bangladesh’s deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has launched scathing criticisms against the upcoming February elections, declaring them fundamentally compromised. The 78-year-old leader, now living in exile since her August 2024 ousting following massive student-led protests, broke her prolonged public silence to challenge the legitimacy of the electoral process.

Hasina’s forceful condemnation came during a panel discussion titled ‘Bangladesh at the Crossroads’ hosted in New Delhi, where she asserted that genuine democracy remains elusive under the current transitional government. Her message reached over 100,000 online viewers simultaneously, creating immediate political reverberations across South Asia.

The former leader, who previously governed Bangladesh for fifteen consecutive years, faces a death sentence imposed in absentia by a Dhaka court last November. The conviction centered on charges of crimes against humanity, including incitement to violence and systematic failure to prevent atrocities during her administration.

Current interim leader Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate recalled from exile to helm the caretaker government, maintains that the February 12 vote will establish new benchmarks for electoral integrity. Official statements from Yunus’ office emphasize the administration’s commitment to transparent and credible elections.

However, Hasina specifically targeted Yunus in her address, describing his influence as an oppressive shadow over Bangladeshi democracy. Her Awami League party, once the nation’s dominant political force, now operates under official prohibition with its activities criminalized.

The escalating tension between these rival visions for Bangladesh’s future complicates already delicate diplomatic relations between India and Bangladesh. New Delhi’s decision to provide sanctuary to the deposed leader has generated sustained friction since the transfer of power.

The Fujian Coast Guard has executed routine law enforcement operations in maritime territories adjacent to Jinmen, demonstrating China’s ongoing commitment to maintaining maritime security and sovereignty. These patrols, conducted as part of standardized procedures, represent the consistent implementation of China’s maritime governance policies.

The operations follow established protocols for monitoring and regulating activities within China’s jurisdictional waters. The patrols serve multiple purposes including maritime safety oversight, illegal activity prevention, and border security maintenance. Such exercises reflect the continuous efforts by Chinese authorities to ensure stability and lawful order in regional waters.

These maneuvers occur within the framework of China’s domestic laws and international maritime regulations. The Coast Guard’s presence in these waters constitutes normal practice for sovereign states exercising their legitimate rights to patrol territorial waters and exclusive economic zones. The operations align with China’s broader strategy of maintaining peaceful and regulated maritime environments through professional law enforcement capabilities.

The timing of these patrols corresponds with increased regional attention to maritime security matters, though officials emphasize their routine nature. China maintains that such activities represent standard procedure rather than exceptional measures, consistent with how coastal nations worldwide administer their maritime territories.

A comprehensive national survey has uncovered significant bipartisan support among American citizens for enhanced cooperation between the United States and China, even as concerns mount regarding how escalating geopolitical tensions are adversely affecting Chinese American communities.

The landmark study, conducted through collaboration between the Committee of 100 and the University of Chicago’s National Opinion Research Center (NORC), represents one of the most extensive independent social research initiatives in the United States. According to Alex Chew, NORC AmeriSpeak director and head of Amplify AAPI, this third iteration of the State of Chinese Americans research provides unprecedented breadth in examining public perceptions regarding issues impacting Chinese American communities.

The findings reveal that 59% of US citizens advocate for their government to strengthen collaborative efforts with China on diplomatic matters and policies of mutual concern. This perspective transcends political affiliations, with 65% of Democrats and 63% of Republicans expressing support for closer Sino-American cooperation.

The collaborative sentiment extends significantly into scientific and technological domains. Merely 23% of respondents endorsed prohibiting Chinese researchers from working within US institutions, revealing a substantial partisan divide—with only 16% of Democrats but 34% of Republicans supporting such restrictions.

Sam Collitt, research lead at the Committee of 100, emphasized that these findings demonstrate minimal public support for policies that would undoubtedly strain international relations and produce negative outcomes. The survey questions regarding researcher restrictions were formulated in response to numerous federal and state efforts to prosecute, restrict, and ban Chinese researchers from American institutions.

Collitt noted that these results align with recent surveys by Pew Research Center and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, suggesting that negative attitudes toward China among the American public may have peaked. However, researchers caution that it remains uncertain whether this represents a temporary fluctuation or the beginning of a sustained trend toward improved perceptions.

The research also highlighted how initiatives like the “China Initiative” program—which resulted in numerous Chinese American scientists facing false espionage allegations—exemplify how bilateral tensions directly harm Chinese American communities. As China narrows the economic gap with the United States, resulting in many Americans perceiving China as a threat, University of Maryland history professor Madeline Hsu suggests Americans need historical context, noting China’s pre-1800 status as an extremely wealthy civilization before its decline under Western imperial exploitation.

Jared Kushner, former Middle East adviser to President Donald Trump, has presented an ambitious vision for Gaza’s future featuring modern cities with sleek high-rises, attractive coastline developments, and state-of-the-art port facilities. His presentation at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, outlined a rapid reconstruction timeline claiming Gaza’s cities could be rebuilt within three years given adequate security conditions.

This optimistic projection emerges as world leaders gather to ratify the charter of the Board of Peace, a newly proposed body intended to oversee Gaza’s ceasefire and reconstruction process. However, the initiative faces significant international resistance and skepticism regarding its feasibility and potential implications for global governance structures.

Major European powers have expressed strong reservations about the Board of Peace, with Spain explicitly declining participation in the initiative. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez emphasized the country’s commitment to multilateralism and the United Nations system. European Council President Antonio Costa similarly voiced serious doubts regarding the board’s scope, governance structure, and compatibility with the UN Charter following emergency summit discussions in Brussels.

Academic experts have raised concerns about the potential undermining of United Nations authority. Ayman Yousef, Professor of International Relations at the Arab American University in Jenin, warned that such alternative bodies could weaken the UN’s mission and legal resolutions regarding the Palestinian question.

Practical obstacles further complicate the ambitious reconstruction timeline. The United Nations Office for Project Services estimates Gaza contains over 60 million metric tons of rubble—enough to fill nearly 3,000 container ships—requiring more than seven years for clearance alone, not including subsequent demining operations. Rights groups note that rubble clearance and demining activities have not substantially begun due to Israeli restrictions on heavy machinery entry.

Security concerns present additional complications. Conflict resolution expert Nomi Bar-Yaacov of the Geneva Centre for Security Policy described the high-rise development concept as “unrealistic,” noting Israel would unlikely accept structures providing clear visibility into its military installations near the border. Former US Middle East negotiator Aaron David Miller concluded the initiative lacks both bandwidth and guiding principles necessary for serious international participation.