分类: world

  • ‘Extremely high’ radiation detected inside Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant’s reactor

    ‘Extremely high’ radiation detected inside Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant’s reactor

    Fifteen years after a catastrophic 9.0-magnitude earthquake and devastating tsunami triggered one of the worst nuclear accidents in modern history, plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings (TEPCO) has made a landmark measurement inside the crippled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant: “extremely high” radiation levels detected within the facility’s No. 2 reactor.

    Published by TEPCO this Thursday, the findings mark the first time that operational staff have successfully recorded radiation readings inside one of the three reactors that suffered full core meltdowns during the 2011 disaster. According to Japan’s national public broadcaster NHK, the measurement was collected on April 16, when a fiberscope fitted with specialized radiation detection hardware was fed through existing plant piping into the sealed reactor chamber.

    At a measurement point roughly five meters above the reactor’s base, the device recorded a radiation dose of 4.7 sieverts per hour — a level officially categorized as “extremely high” by nuclear safety standards. To put this figure in context, a full-body exposure of just 5 sieverts is estimated to cause fatal radiation poisoning in half of all affected humans, highlighting the extreme hazards still present inside the damaged facility more than a decade after the accident.

    TEPCO officials confirmed that the new readings confirm the continued presence of a substantial volume of molten nuclear debris inside the No. 2 reactor. In the wake of the 2011 disaster, all three of the plant’s operating reactors (Units 1 through 3) suffered complete core meltdowns when the tsunami knocked out backup power for cooling systems, leaving behind an estimated total of 880 metric tons of highly radioactive molten debris spread across the three damaged reactor chambers.

    Moving forward, TEPCO announced it will conduct deeper analysis of the collected data to refine existing models of debris distribution, and will continue developing safe methodologies to eventually remove the radioactive material from the reactors. The removal of this debris is universally recognized as the single greatest technical hurdle to the full decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi plant, a decades-long project that has faced repeated delays and unforeseen challenges since cleanup efforts began.

  • Red Cross envoy applauds Beijing’s humanitarian action

    Red Cross envoy applauds Beijing’s humanitarian action

    On the 10th anniversary of a landmark bilateral envoy role, the International Committee of the Red Cross’ top representative to China has publicly praised Beijing’s growing contribution to global humanitarian efforts, highlighting its unwavering commitment to upholding international humanitarian law and diplomatic work to de-escalate global crises.

    Balthasar Staehelin, who serves both as the personal envoy of the ICRC President to China and head of the ICRC East Asia Regional Delegation based in Beijing, is the third official to hold the unique envoy post. The position, created in 2016, was the first country-specific envoy role the ICRC had ever established, a designation Staehelin says carries profound symbolic weight for the organization’s relationship with China.

    “The creation and continuation of this role clearly signals that the ICRC recognizes China’s rising global influence, and that we have a critical need to deepen constructive dialogue with both Chinese government bodies and civil society organizations,” Staehelin explained in his remarks, marking 10 years since the post was first created.

    Over the past decade, collaboration between the ICRC and Chinese stakeholders has expanded dramatically, Staehelin noted. Amid a global surge in active armed conflicts, ICRC teams operating in conflict zones now routinely coordinate with Chinese diplomatic missions, UN peacekeeping contingents deployed by China, and Chinese firms operating abroad. The organization also partners with Chinese companies active across Africa to build capacity for corporate social responsibility and safe operations in high-risk unstable environments, spanning a far broader scope of engagement than ever before.

    During his nearly three years of work based in China, Staehelin has observed a growing willingness among Chinese stakeholders to explore new avenues for contributing to international conflict resolution. He pointed to policy guidance laid out in China’s 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030), which outlines a clear trajectory toward expanded engagement in international humanitarian assistance. “We are already seeing increased funding allocations and grants directed to international humanitarian organizations, as well as expanded bilateral aid. There is a clear upward trend of doing more, and that is very positive,” he said.

    This policy shift is backed by tangible on-the-ground action. Recent high-profile examples include emergency cash aid delivered to southern African nations hit by catastrophic flooding earlier this year, and ongoing implementation of a $100 million humanitarian aid pledge for Palestine announced by China last December.

    Staehelin also drew attention to China’s increasingly active role in international conflict mediation, pointing to two landmark breakthroughs brokered by Beijing: the 2023 reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and the historic Beijing Declaration signed by competing Palestinian factions. He further highlighted the launch of the International Organization for Mediation (IOMed), the world’s first intergovernmental legal organization focused exclusively on resolving international disputes through mediation, which was initiated by China and is hosted in Hong Kong.

    “All these developments point to a shifting landscape: China is not only becoming more active in delivering humanitarian aid, it is also emerging as a key actor that proposes tangible solutions to global conflicts,” Staehelin said.

    He traced this growing engagement to deep-rooted cultural values that align closely with the ICRC’s core mission. “A strong ethos of solidarity and people-to-people connection is deeply embedded in Chinese society. The idea of shared common humanity runs through Chinese thought and tradition, and that aligns perfectly with the ICRC’s humanitarian mission,” he added.

    Staehelin also noted strong alignment between the ICRC’s core ideals and China’s Global Governance Initiative. “China’s approach to global policy is fundamentally people-centered. This focus on people is where our two frameworks strongly resonate. The emphasis on delivering tangible, on-the-ground impact and upholding international humanitarian law are core elements of China’s Global Governance Initiative that the ICRC fully identifies with.”

    That shared commitment was formalized in September 2024, when China joined the ICRC and five other nations to co-launch the Global Initiative to Galvanize Political Commitment to International Humanitarian Law. “China brought its significant political influence and global weight to launch this initiative, and that is deeply appreciated by the ICRC,” Staehelin said. “What we also see, and what we hope all nations will emulate, is that China consistently and explicitly references the importance of international humanitarian law in its global policy proposals.”

    Staehelin emphasized that China’s consistent reaffirmation of respect for international humanitarian law in UN forums and conflict resolution proposals fills a critical global need. “It is essential to maintain a global consensus that international humanitarian law is absolutely vital to protect civilian lives and create the conditions for lasting stability and peace,” he said.

    Drawing on three decades of experience in international humanitarian work, Staehelin also offered a stark assessment of the current global context. “We have seen the number of active armed conflicts double over the past 15 years. At the same time, many countries are increasing defense spending while cutting overseas development assistance budgets. That means needs are growing faster than ever, but available funding is shrinking,” he noted.

  • Briton in Netflix’s ‘Con Mum’ faces fresh charges in Singapore

    Briton in Netflix’s ‘Con Mum’ faces fresh charges in Singapore

    An 85-year-old British woman already facing fraud charges connected to a high-profile Netflix documentary has received dozens of additional accusations as investigators expand their probe into her alleged decades-long scam. Dionne Marie Hanna, a Singapore resident who became a household name after the streaming platform released *Con Mum* in March 2025, now stands accused of defrauding 14 people out of large sums of money to finance her opulent public persona.

    Hanna’s alleged scheme relies on one consistent, elaborate lie: she claims to be an illegitimate, wealthy member of Brunei’s royal family, set to receive a massive multi-million dollar inheritance that has been tied up in legal red tape. To access that inheritance, she tells her targets, she needs small upfront sums to cover legal fees, administrative costs, and bank processing charges — promising 10-fold repayment as soon as her assets are released. She has also leveraged sympathy by claiming she is terminally ill, and even told some victims she would donate large portions of her inheritance to local Singaporean Muslim charities and a mosque once it became available, court documents show.

    Prior to Thursday’s announcement, Hanna already faced five charges connected to allegations that she deceived three men across Singapore and France into transferring funds to her accounts. The 34 new charges bring her total count to 39, and expand the roster of alleged victims to include her own biological son, London-based Michelin-starred pastry chef Graham Hornigold. According to local Singaporean broadcaster Channel NewsAsia, the new accusations lay out a pattern of bold deception: in one case, Hanna convinced a man to cover hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal expenses for her, after promising to name him her stepson and repay him in full from her inheritance. In another, she persuaded a woman to give her money for supposed processing fees, with a guarantee that Hanna would purchase high-end vehicles including a Lexus and an Aston Martin, plus a luxury property in Singapore’s exclusive Sentosa Cove neighborhood, for her after the inheritance cleared.

    Hanna was first arrested and charged last year, after the production of *Con Mum* brought her alleged activities to public attention. The documentary follows Hornigold’s emotional journey reconnecting with Hanna, who reached out to him out of the blue claiming to be his long-lost mother. A DNA test confirmed her biological relation, and she quickly won over the chef and his inner circle by presenting herself as a wealthy, loving parent eager to make up for lost time. She initially lavished Hornigold, his former partner, and their friends with expensive gifts ranging from cars to property, but soon began asking for increasing sums of money to cover supposed inheritance-related costs. By the end of the ordeal, Hornigold told the documentary he had lost roughly £300,000 to her schemes. The film also notes that Hanna has prior convictions for fraud and shoplifting in the United Kingdom.

    Hanna currently faces charges of cheating and fraud by false representation, the latter of which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison if she is convicted. Her case is scheduled for a pre-trial conference in May 2025, as prosecutors continue to build their case against the 85-year-old.

  • War in the Middle East: latest developments

    War in the Middle East: latest developments

    The ongoing conflict in the Middle East has sent ripples across global energy markets and international diplomacy, with a flurry of new developments emerging over the past 24 hours that have heightened economic uncertainty and shifted geopolitical dynamics.

    One of the most significant warnings came from the International Energy Agency (IEA), which projects that strained global liquefied natural gas (LNG) markets—tightened significantly by the ongoing regional conflict—will remain constrained through the end of 2026 and into 2027. The energy volatility has already moved global markets: oil prices have continued their upward climb, while equity markets have faced downward pressure as investors grow increasingly anxious over stalled diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the crisis. Adding to market jitters are ongoing threats to critical energy chokepoints, with Iran maintaining its position of tension around the Strait of Hormuz and the United States upholding its blockade of Iranian ports.

    On the diplomatic front, French President Emmanuel Macron emphasized the urgent need for regional calm during his participation in an EU summit held in Nicosia, where scheduled talks with Middle Eastern leaders were on the agenda. “It is in everyone’s interest for stability to return as soon as possible and for the world’s economies to be reassured,” Macron stated.

    In a counterterrorism move, the U.S. State Department announced a reward of up to $10 million for any information leading to the leader of Kataeb Sayyid al-Shuhada (KSS), an Iraqi armed group backed by Tehran that Washington has formally designated as a terrorist organization.

    A limited win for de-escalation came with the announcement of a three-week extension to the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, made public by U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday. Speaking to reporters, Trump expressed optimism about long-term peace, saying “I think there’s a very good chance of having peace. I think it should be an easy one.” He also confirmed plans to hold high-level talks with leaders from both nations in the coming two weeks. The ceasefire extension was immediately tested, however, after Hezbollah announced it had launched rocket attacks targeting the Shtula settlement in northern Israel. The group claimed the strike was retaliation for Israeli violations of the ceasefire and an Israeli strike on the southern Lebanese town of Yater.

    Trump also addressed rising tensions with Iran, telling reporters at the White House that while the U.S. faces no immediate pressure to end the ongoing standoff with Tehran, “the clock is ticking” for the Iranian government as the conflict’s disruptions continue to harm the global economy. He explicitly ruled out the use of nuclear weapons against Iran, noting “A nuclear weapon should never be allowed to be used by anybody.”

    To bolster its military presence in the region, the U.S. military confirmed that the USS George H.W. Bush aircraft carrier has arrived in Middle Eastern waters, bringing the total number of U.S. Navy carrier battle groups deployed in the theater to three. Trump also issued a new operational order for U.S. naval forces in the region, saying “I have ordered the United States Navy to shoot and kill any boat, small boats though they may be…that is putting mines in the waters of the Strait of Hormuz.” Just days after a similar interdiction, the U.S. Defense Department also announced that U.S. forces had boarded a vessel in the Indian Ocean suspected of carrying material support to Iran, marking the second such operation in three days.

    On the sports front, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio distanced the American government from calls to bar Iran from this year’s World Cup, including a proposal that Italy take the Iranian national team’s place in the tournament. Rubio confirmed that Iranian footballers are welcome to compete, and denied that Washington had requested the team stay home. He did, however, note that members of the Iranian delegation with documented ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) may be denied entry.

    Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz reaffirmed his country’s military preparedness for wider conflict, stating that Israel is “prepared to resume the war” and is only waiting for authorization from Washington to push Iran back “to the Stone Age.”

  • A massive, unstable ice block stalls Everest climbers at base camp

    A massive, unstable ice block stalls Everest climbers at base camp

    KATHMANDU, NEPAL – A dangerous unstable ice formation has thrown a wrench into the 2024 spring Mount Everest climbing season, forcing hundreds of climbers and their Nepalese support teams to pause their summit bids just as operations are set to ramp up, Nepalese mountaineering officials confirmed Friday.

    The hazard is a massive hanging serac located along the standard climbing route between Everest’s base camp and Camp 1, a section of the iconic peak that already ranks among the most dangerous in the world. Himal Gautam, a representative from Nepal’s Department of Mountaineering, confirmed the ice block is shifting and poses an unacceptable level of risk for teams moving up the mountain. As of Friday, more than 800 total people – including permitted foreign climbers and their local guides – are stuck at base camp, waiting for officials to sign off on a safe passage forward, with expedition leaders and government teams working around the clock to re-evaluate conditions daily.

    This year’s spring climbing window, the most popular period for summit attempts on Everest, runs through the end of May. Nepal’s tourism department has already issued 410 summit permits to foreign climbers for the season, a number that will double when counting the required Nepalese Sherpa guides, porters, and support staff that accompany every expedition.

    The problematic serac sits within the Khumbu Icefall, a notoriously unpredictable glacial stretch that is universally regarded as one of the most treacherous sections of any Everest climb. The icefall is constantly shifting, dotted with gaping hidden crevasses and topped with overhanging ice blocks the size of 10-story buildings, any of which can collapse without warning.

    Preparing a safe route through the Khumbu Icefall falls to the Icefall Doctors, an elite team of experienced Sherpa guides who annually fix climbing ropes and install aluminum ladders across deep crevasses to open the passage for expeditions. This work is typically completed by mid-April, but the unstable serac has halted progress. The Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee, the organization that manages the Icefall Doctor team, is now planning to conduct an aerial survey to fully assess the serac’s stability. Committee chairman Lama Kazi Sherpa said the current avalanche risk is far too high for ground teams to work safely, so officials are adopting a wait-and-see approach, holding off on reopening the route until the ice block naturally melts to a safer size.

    This is not the first time a massive ice collapse in the Khumbu Icefall has caused tragedy on Everest. In 2014, a large chunk of glacial ice broke loose and triggered a devastating avalanche that killed 16 Sherpa guides who were moving client equipment up the mountain. That disaster remains one of the deadliest accidents in the recorded history of Everest climbing.

    Climbing teams typically time their summit bids for early to mid-May, when short, stable weather windows offer the best conditions for a push to the 8,848.86-meter (29,031.7-foot) peak. More than 4,000 climbers have successfully reached the summit since the first recorded ascent by New Zealander Edmund Hillary and Sherpa Tenzing Norgay on May 29, 1953.

  • Trump says ceasefire between Israel, Lebanon to be extended by 3 weeks

    Trump says ceasefire between Israel, Lebanon to be extended by 3 weeks

    On April 23, 2026, at the White House in Washington D.C., U.S. President Donald Trump made a key announcement: the fragile 10-day ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, which went into effect on April 16, will be extended by an additional three weeks. The announcement came just hours after the two nations wrapped up their second round of ambassador-level talks in the U.S. capital, a meeting that brought together senior diplomatic leadership from both sides alongside top U.S. officials.

    Trump confirmed the meeting took place in the White House Oval Office, with attendees including U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter, Lebanon’s Ambassador to the U.S. Nada Hamadeh Moawad, and U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa. In a post published to his social media platform Truth Social, Trump simply stated, “The Meeting went very well!”, offering no further specifics on the discussions that unfolded during the closed-door session.

    The U.S. leader also outlined Washington’s planned next steps in the region, noting the United States will partner with Lebanon’s national government to help the country build its defensive capacity against Hezbollah, the Iran-aligned political and military group that holds significant influence in southern Lebanon. Trump further shared his long-term diplomatic goal, saying he remains eager to host senior leadership from both nations in the near future: Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. This plan aligns with comments Trump made last week, when he said he expected the two leaders to visit the White House within one to two weeks to work toward a comprehensive permanent peace agreement that would resolve ongoing tensions related to Hezbollah.

    The original 10-day truce was implemented after weeks of escalating cross-border hostilities that unfolded amid the broader U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran. It is important to note that Israel and Lebanon have never maintained formal diplomatic relations. For decades, Israel has classified Hezbollah as an Iranian proxy force, and current negotiations are being conducted exclusively between the Israeli government and Lebanon’s official national government, with Hezbollah not participating directly in the talks.

    Despite the pause in large-scale fighting that the ceasefire brought, the truce has remained unstable throughout its first week, with low-level tensions persisting along Lebanon’s southern border, leaving regional observers cautious about the long-term prospects of the newly announced extension.

  • First ever talks to ditch fossil fuels as UN deadlock deepens

    First ever talks to ditch fossil fuels as UN deadlock deepens

    Against a backdrop of rising global temperatures driven by decades of fossil fuel consumption and repeated deadlock at United Nations climate negotiations, around 60 countries have convened this week in Santa Marta, Colombia, for a landmark gathering aimed at forging collective action to phase out coal, oil, and gas — a goal that major UN climate summits have repeatedly failed to deliver.

    The participating nations collectively account for approximately one-fifth of the world’s total fossil fuel production, counting major producers including Colombia, Australia, and Nigeria among their ranks. Notably absent from the talks, however, are the world’s largest fossil fuel-consuming and producing powers: the United States, China, and India.

    For years, progress on cutting fossil fuel dependence has stalled at the annual UN Climate Change Conference (COP), the global governing body for climate action. The consensus-based rule structure of COP negotiations means every participating nation holds veto power over final agreements, allowing large fossil fuel-producing blocs to block ambitious targets. This gridlock left many delegates deeply frustrated after last November’s COP30 held in Belém, Brazil, where efforts to adopt a formal global roadmap for a full fossil fuel phase-out collapsed in the face of opposition from major oil-exporting countries.

    Organizers emphasize that this new Colombian gathering is not intended to replace the COP process, but rather to complement it by building momentum that can break long-standing impasses. The urgency of this effort has been amplified by leading climate science, which warns that the window to limit global warming to the 1.5°C threshold — the safe guardrail set in the Paris Agreement to avoid the worst, irreversible climate impacts — is rapidly closing.

    “ We are inevitably going to crash through the 1.5°C limit within the next three to five years,” Professor Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, told BBC News. “Breaking through 1.5°C means we enter a far more dangerous world — with more frequent and intense droughts, floods, fires and heatwaves — and we are already approaching critical tipping points in major Earth systems.”

    Beyond climate science, shifting global geopolitics is reshaping the global energy conversation, adding new urgency to the push for transition. Under the second Trump administration, the world’s largest economy, the United States, has ramped up aggressive policies to expand domestic coal, oil, and gas production, creating global uncertainty about the pace of decarbonization. Many middle-power nations have since adopted a wait-and-see stance, hesitant to commit to fast transition without clearer global direction.

    Participants in the Santa Marta talks say the gathering’s core goal is to demonstrate that a critical mass of nations is already committed to shifting to renewable energy, giving hesitant countries the confidence to move forward. “We are committed to working with other countries to support those wishing to drive forward their transitions to clean and secure energy,” said UK Climate Envoy Rachel Kyte, who is in attendance. “We have the experience of our transition to share and the recent experience of driving to energy security with our clean power mission.”

    Recent geopolitical unrest has underscored the risks of continued fossil fuel dependence, pushing energy security back to the top of the global policy agenda. Ongoing conflict in the Middle East, combined with rising tensions in the strategic Strait of Hormuz through which 20% of the world’s daily oil shipments pass, has sent global oil prices climbing in recent weeks.

    “The urgency is multiplied. What’s happening has worsened the fossil fuel crisis we’re already in,” said former Irish President Mary Robinson, a founding member of the elders group of former global leaders, who is attending the talks. “This is exactly why this conference matters now.”

    These market disruptions are already shifting consumer and industry behavior, Rockström reported. After a recent advisory board meeting with automotive giant Mercedes-Benz, he noted that the company had seen a sharp uptick in European consumer demand for electric vehicles, driven by growing public desire for energy independence away from volatile global fossil fuel markets.

    The formation of this new “coalition of the willing” has sparked debate about whether it signals a permanent shift away from the consensus-based COP process. But observers and organizers alike argue it can instead revitalize global climate action. “Ultimately you don’t need all countries to drive global progress. You need a starting point,” said Katerine Petersen, a climate analyst with think tank E3G who is attending the gathering. “Then you need a coalition that can expand over time and show how it can and will be useful. And I think that’s what we’re expecting to see from Santa Marta.”

    Organizers stress the meeting remains complementary to COP, and key leaders from last year’s COP30 in Brazil are in attendance in Santa Marta. Conclusions from the Colombian gathering will be integrated into Brazil’s national fossil fuel phase-out roadmap, which the country will release ahead of COP31 scheduled to take place in Turkey this November. Even as domestic protestors in London rallied this week against plans for new UK oil and gas exploration, the Santa Marta meeting marks a key test of whether smaller, committed blocs can push the world faster toward a clean energy future when global negotiations stall.

  • Steve Rosenberg: Kremlin’s tightening grip on internet fuels public discontent

    Steve Rosenberg: Kremlin’s tightening grip on internet fuels public discontent

    Near the heart of Moscow, steps away from the Kremlin walls, dozens of Russian residents stand in an orderly line outside the presidential administration building. They have gathered not to protest openly, but to exercise one of the few legally permitted forms of civic action: submitting a formal petition urging President Vladimir Putin to roll back the Kremlin’s escalating crackdown on online access. What should be a routine act of democratic input, however, carries palpable risk in Russia’s increasingly authoritarian political climate. From across the street, uniformed security officers openly film both the petitioners and the reporting team documenting the event, a quiet but clear reminder that speaking out carries consequences. When asked if she feels afraid, Yulia, a small catering business owner waiting in the queue, admits openly: “Very scared. I’m shaking.”

    The Kremlin has been steadily tightening its grip on Russia’s digital cyberspace for years, but recent weeks have seen sweeping new restrictions that have upended daily life for millions of users. Access to globally popular messaging platforms including WhatsApp and Telegram has been sharply limited, while widespread mobile internet disruptions and full blackouts have been reported across multiple regions of the country. President Putin has publicly acknowledged the connectivity problems, framing the measures as necessary “operational work to prevent terrorist attacks.” He has also issued formal instructions to officials to preserve “uninterrupted operation” for critical internet services, but stopped short of promising to roll back the broader crackdown.

    For small business owners like Yulia, the restrictions are not just an inconvenience – they threaten her entire livelihood. Her catering operation runs entirely online, relying on global messaging apps to coordinate with clients and a public website to accept orders. “There were times recently when our website was not accessible. We couldn’t generate revenue,” she explained. “We are losing money every time there is a blocking of the internet, a blocking of Telegram and WhatsApp. Without internet access, my business in this form will not exist.”

    Russian officials defend the curbs as a matter of national and public safety. They claim that mobile internet blackouts help disorient attacking Ukrainian drones, a justification critics point out is undermined by the fact that drone strikes have continued in regions where connectivity has been fully shut off. Authorities also accuse international messaging platforms of refusing to comply with Russia’s strict local data storage laws, which require user information to be held on servers within Russian borders. Alongside restricting global services, regulators have launched a crackdown on virtual private networks (VPNs), tools that thousands of Russians use to circumvent government censorship and access blocked content.

    As the centerpiece of the Kremlin’s push for a “sovereign internet” – a closed, state-controlled network cut off from much of the global web – the government has aggressively promoted MAX, a new homegrown, state-backed messaging app. But the Russian public remains deeply skeptical of the platform. Many users worry the app is designed specifically to let security services surveil private communications, a concern echoed by opposition figures. “Many people think that this messenger is made especially by the government to check our messages,” said Boris Nadezhdin, a former member of parliament who was barred from running against Putin in the 2024 presidential election.

    Across much of Russia today, only government-approved websites and services are accessible to mobile users. Opposition analysts warn that a digital equivalent of the Cold War-era Iron Curtain is being constructed around the country, designed to cut Russian citizens off from outside information and unapproved content. “The idea is to divide Russia from the outside world,” said Andrei Kolesnikov, a columnist with independent opposition outlet Novaya Gazeta. “This world is believed to be poisonous to the brains of Russians. Russia was always blocked, primarily from the West, which was the source of ‘bad, revolutionary, liberal ideas’. It was always like this.”

    Unlike the Soviet era, however, generations of Russians have fully integrated the open internet into every part of daily life, making the new restrictions feel like a sudden and disruptive shock to routine. For many, the anger over the crackdown stems less from ideological demands for free speech and more from the loss of ordinary convenience that most people now take for granted. “It’s less to do with freedom of speech and more about habit,” explained Yulia Grekova, an activist based in Vladimir, a city 190 kilometers outside Moscow. “People have got used to paying for things and ordering taxis with their mobiles. They sit in the bus messaging friends. There are very few people who don’t use mobile internet for work, public services and to keep in touch with family. That’s why there’s such an angry reaction. Everyone’s affected.”

    Grekova has firsthand experience of how the Kremlin responds to public pushback against the internet restrictions. She recently attempted to organize a public rally in Vladimir to protest the curbs, but authorities blocked the event through a series of procedural stalling tactics. When she submitted applications for 11 different potential rally locations, officials rejected every site claiming street cleaning was scheduled for the requested date. City hall offered an alternative venue, only to reverse that approval a short time later, citing the risk of a Ukrainian drone attack. Grekova was later visited at her workplace by three police officers who served her a formal warning prohibiting any unsanctioned protest. “They filmed me signing the official warning from the prosecutor. I felt like some kind of terrorist,” she said. Similar attempts to hold protest rallies have been rejected across dozens of Russian cities, with authorities offering a range of absurd justifications, from scheduled roller-skating classes to residual COVID-19 restrictions.

    During a visit to central Vladimir, the impact of the crackdown was immediately visible: state media sites and domestic taxi apps functioned normally, but Google searches failed to load, and all independent news sites were completely inaccessible. Local residents described constant small disruptions that have upended ordinary routines. “It’s much harder to communicate,” said Maria, who was out walking with her infant child. “We want to keep across the latest news and trends. Instead, we’re lagging behind.” For some, the restrictions have compounded existing fatigue over the ongoing war in Ukraine. “In the past, when there was no internet, the world seemed a brighter place, because we knew less,” Maria said. “I try to avoid news about the war. I don’t want to fill my head with it. We’re tired of news about people being killed.” Other residents described far more practical disruptions: “Today I couldn’t pay for petrol. And my satnav is glitching,” said local resident Denis. Small business owners have been hit hardest, said Alexander, another local resident: “People are annoyed. Especially those with small businesses. They lose customers when they can’t access the internet.” For Grekova, the crackdown feels like a deliberate step backwards into a pre-digital era. “It feels like we’re going backwards, sliding back to the past,” she said.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov defends the restrictions as a temporary necessity driven by the current security environment. “In the current situation, security considerations dictate the need for certain measures,” Peskov told reporters in Moscow. “These are being taken and most of our citizens understand the need for them. It’s clear that internet restrictions inconvenience many people. But this is the period we’re in. Once the need for such measures disappears, services will be fully restored and return to normal.” But critics warn that the new restrictions have already become the permanent new normal, and that the Kremlin will only continue to ramp up controls rather than roll them back. “I don’t think that this regime is ready to go back,” Kolesnikov said. “They can only go forward in terms of more repressions. What is bad for the authorities is an accumulation of discontent and it could play out in the future. We don’t know in what shape. But it is evident that irritation and discontent are accumulating.”

    That discontent is already starting to bubble into public view. In recent weeks, a viral video posted to Instagram by prominent Russian celebrity blogger Victoria Bonya criticizing the internet crackdown has amassed tens of millions of views. While Bonya did not directly blame Putin, she told him directly: “There is a huge, thick wall between you and us, the ordinary people.” Under growing public pressure, Putin acknowledged last week that he could not ignore the connectivity problems facing Russian citizens, and instructed security officials to find ways to accommodate the “vital interests of citizens.” But the statement stopped far short of a policy reversal, with no mention of ending the broader restrictions.

    Public opinion polling suggests that Putin’s approval ratings have fallen to their lowest level since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, with internet restrictions just one of multiple sources of growing public unease. Russians are also facing rising food prices, strained public services, and growing war fatigue. “People begin to understand there is a direct connection between their everyday problems, like healthcare, food prices, problems with internet, and the politics of Vladimir Putin,” Nadezhdin said. “And this is a new situation in Russia.”

    After submitting her petition outside the Kremlin, Yulia has returned to work baking bread at her catering company, already planning how to adapt to the new online restrictions. Like many Russians, she says her family has a long history of adapting to massive political and social upheaval. “My great-grandfather was wealthier than average. In a Soviet village that was considered a sin. His property was taken away from him and he was moved to Siberia. But his family adapted. My parents went through the collapse of the Soviet Union: they adapted to a market economy. Now it’s my turn to adapt. Then it will be my daughter’s turn.” When asked what she expects for the future, Yulia says long-term planning has become impossible. “The future is not even mentioned in day-to-day conversations with friends and relatives. It’s like: what are we doing in three days, in a week, in a month? Nothing more than a month.” Across Russia, as restrictions tighten and daily life grows more unpredictable, a deep, pervasive sense of uncertainty is quietly rising.

  • Mass MS-13 trial held at El Salvador mega-jail

    Mass MS-13 trial held at El Salvador mega-jail

    In a historic, high-security proceeding at El Salvador’s controversial Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) — the world’s largest mega-prison — hundreds of alleged members of the transnational criminal gang Mara Salvatrucha, better known as MS-13, appeared before the court this week to face charges of mass murder, torture and organized terror. On Thursday, Agence France-Presse reporters granted access to the restricted facility witnessed a stark scene: 220 defendants, all clad in matching white t-shirts and shorts, heads shaved, secured by chains, sat motionless and silent in orderly rows of plastic chairs arranged across CECOT’s main assembly hall. Hundreds of additional co-defendants joined the proceeding remotely from other blocks of the facility. Among those on trial are roughly 20 alleged high-ranking MS-13 leaders, including Borromeo Henriquez (known by the alias “The Little Devil of Hollywood”) and Carlos Tiberio Ramirez (“Snaider of Pasadena”), alongside dozens of mid-level gang lieutenants. Most defendants bore the gang’s signature tattoos across their faces, necks, hands and scalps, with some staring directly at visiting press as heavily armored security guards bearing riot shields formed a protective perimeter around the courtroom. Prosecutors allege the group collectively carried out more than 29,000 brutal killings across El Salvador over decades of gang rule. During Thursday’s testimony, graphic accounts of the gang’s violence played over the courtroom’s public address system. One witness recalled, “We burned her genitals and buttocks,” describing a targeted killing ordered by gang leadership. Additional testimony from two witnesses confirmed that MS-13 commanders continued to order murders from inside prison walls, even amid widespread state crackdowns. Prosecutors have directly linked the two top accused leaders to roughly 9,000 crimes, and the men showed no visible reaction as the chilling charges were read aloud. The mass trial is the centerpiece of Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele’s high-profile “war on gangs,” a sweeping security crackdown launched in 2022 that has seen more than 90,000 suspected gang members arrested under a prolonged state of emergency. Bukele, who has openly styled himself as the “world’s coolest dictator” in media appearances, has compared the CECOT mass trial to the Nuremberg Trials that prosecuted Nazi leadership after World War II. CECOT director Belarmino Garcia echoed the government’s framing, telling reporters, “These individuals caused mourning and pain to our society for many years.” A uniformed CECOT security agent, who spoke on condition of anonymity, added of the witness testimony: “It’s a horrifying account that makes your hair stand on end.” The Salvadoran government invited international journalists to observe the fourth day of proceedings, though access was tightly controlled under strict security protocols. For Bukele, the crackdown on gangs has proven politically transformative: supporters credit him with turning El Salvador from a nation once labeled the murder capital of the world into a safer country, and his hardline approach has become a template for right-wing political candidates across Latin America seeking to capitalize on widespread public anger over violent crime. Yet the mass trial and Bukele’s broader security campaign have faced sharp international criticism, particularly from human rights organizations that warn the sweeping dragnet of arrests has inevitably swept up thousands of innocent people, many of whom were detained for months before being cleared of any links to gangs. The process of mass trying hundreds of defendants at once has also raised alarms about due process violations. Controversy extends beyond El Salvador’s borders as well: Last year, former U.S. President Donald Trump authorized the transfer of 140 alleged Venezuelan gang members to be incarcerated at CECOT, a move that U.S. courts later ruled was unlawful. In 2021, U.S. authorities also leveled allegations that undermined Bukele’s carefully cultivated tough-on-crime image, claiming his administration held “covert negotiations” with MS-13 and other gangs, offering financial incentives in exchange for reduced gang violence and political support for Bukele’s ruling New Ideas party. The CECOT mega-prison, purpose-built to hold tens of thousands of suspected gang members, and the ongoing mass trial have become defining symbols of Bukele’s polarizing approach to public security, dividing supporters who hail his success in curbing violence from critics who warn the campaign is eroding democratic norms and civil liberties in the country.

  • Soviet architecture vanishes as Central Asia drifts from Moscow

    Soviet architecture vanishes as Central Asia drifts from Moscow

    Thirty-five years after the collapse of the Soviet Union left the five Central Asian states independent, a quiet erasure of Soviet-era architectural and artistic heritage is accelerating across the region, driven by a growing ideological shift away from Moscow and state-led efforts to cement distinct national identities.

    In Dushanbe, the capital of Tajikistan, one striking example of this trend sits on the facade of a soon-to-be-demolished apartment block: a massive mosaic honoring Soviet cosmonauts and engineers, celebrating the union’s mid-century scientific breakthroughs. Like thousands of other Soviet relics across Central Asia, the artwork is set to be destroyed to clear space for a luxury new residential development. Local resident Rakhmon Satiev told AFP he holds out hope the mosaic could be carefully removed and reinstalled at the new site, but that wish has little chance of being fulfilled.

    Over the past decade, deliberate neglect and intentional demolition have gutted the region’s Soviet built heritage, from iconic architectural landmarks to public artworks including mosaics, frescoes, and monumental sculptures. “If a building is old and does not fit into the new city plan, it is torn down. The city is being rebuilt and renovated, and the past is vanishing,” Dzhamshed Dzhuraev, a prominent Tajik mosaic artist, explained in an interview with AFP. Behind his Dushanbe studio, a once-prominent monument to Soviet founder Vladimir Lenin stands hidden from public view, a relic of an era regional leaders now deem out of step with modern national narratives.

    Following their 1991 independence, the five Central Asian former Soviet republics — Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan — have seen their urban landscapes transform into a disjointed mix of gleaming new high-rises, crumbling Soviet-era buildings, informal shanties, and half-finished construction projects. For preservation advocates, the rate of heritage loss is alarming. Altynai Kudaibergenova co-founded Artkana, one of the region’s few independent groups working to save Soviet-era architectural heritage in Kyrgyzstan. She says the number of destroyed monuments is “striking,” and warns that Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan’s capital, still holds dozens of magnificent examples of socialist-modernist architecture — a style that has grown popular with international tourists and design fans on social media — that are now at risk of demolition.

    The widespread demolition is rooted in ideological change, as long-serving regional leaders have worked to position themselves as the founding fathers of new independent nations, prioritizing new symbols of national power over leftover markers of Soviet rule. Rarely do officials frame the campaign in explicit ideological terms, however. Even as the region balances enduring economic dependence on Russia with growing Chinese investment, government leaders cast the demolition drive as a practical, cost-effective measure. They argue that renovating aging Soviet-era structures is more expensive than building new developments from scratch, noting the region’s total population has grown to roughly 80 million, creating urgent demand for new housing.

    In Dushanbe, where the mayor is the son of long-ruling president Emomali Rakhmon, the push for urban renewal has centered on replacing Soviet-era landmarks with symbols of the current government. Prominent Tajik sculptor Safarbek Kosimov told AFP that the city’s administration “is doing everything possible to make the buildings as beautiful and comfortable as he can,” adding that Soviet-era mosaics are simply “no longer necessary.” Portraits of the 73-year-old incumbent leader have already replaced many of the demolished Soviet artworks on public building facades across the capital.

    Critics of the campaign say it erases important cultural history for private and political gain. “Most Soviet mosaics were designed to convey an ideological message, but their artistic value is also important,” preservation advocate Kudaibergenova said. “Unfortunately, businesses are rarely receptive to such considerations. Their main priority is selling square metres at a high price.” Multiple nonprofits and international monitoring organizations have documented widespread corruption and opaque collusion between government officials and real estate developers driving large-scale urban renewal projects across the region.

    In Bishkek, local painter Erkinbek Bolzhurov is currently fighting to save the city’s historic House of Artists, which sits adjacent to the former national printing house — a structure that has already been reduced to nothing but its outer walls. “We want the city to develop, of course, but not at the expense of our memory,” he said. “Great artists worked inside these walls. That is what makes the building unique — it has a history.”

    Across Central Asia, tight government control over public expression means authorities rarely consult local communities or preservation groups before approving demolition projects. Still, some artists hold out hope for a future shift in attitudes. Tajik mosaic artist Dzhuraev says he believes “the time will come” when public art like Soviet-era mosaics will again be valued as part of the region’s layered history. “Architects and urban planners should pay them more attention,” he said, adding that a revival of appreciation for this heritage is still possible.