分类: world

  • The UFO community has been waiting for answers. Has the Pentagon delivered?

    The UFO community has been waiting for answers. Has the Pentagon delivered?

    On a historic Friday marked by decades of speculation and demand for transparency, the U.S. government made its first public release of a collection of previously classified documents centered on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), commonly known as UFOs. The 162-document trove, which includes firsthand witness reports, declassified military memos dating back decades, and documentation from the Apollo Moon missions, drew intense attention from long-time UFO enthusiasts and casual observers alike, all waiting for answers about what may lie beyond Earth’s atmosphere.

    The release was quickly celebrated by former President Donald J. Trump, who framed the move as a break from decades of government secrecy. Writing on his Truth Social platform following the public launch of the document portal, Trump noted that prior administrations had failed to deliver transparency on the topic, adding, “the people can decide for themselves, ‘WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?’ Have Fun and Enjoy!”

    The U.S. Department of War launched a dedicated public website to host the declassified files, taking an unusual approach that offers raw material without official analysis or conclusions. In a statement posted alongside the archive, the department acknowledged the massive scope of the declassification effort, announcing that additional materials would be released in periodic tranches every few weeks as they are processed and cleared for public release. The website explicitly notes that all documents posted are unresolved cases, meaning the government has not reached a definitive conclusion on the origin or nature of the reported phenomena. It also called on private sector researchers and experts to contribute their own analysis and information to help unpack the materials.

    For people across the U.S. who have spent decades following UAP research and chasing answers to personal and family connections to sightings, the release marked a long-awaited milestone, even if it delivered no earth-shattering revelations. Elaine Loperena, a 69-year-old grandmother from Clovis, California, has waited for answers since she was a child, when her mother spotted a UFO hovering above while hanging laundry to dry. As an administrator of a large UAP-focused Facebook group, Loperena has seen public interest surge dramatically in recent years: when she joined the group three years ago, it had roughly 40,000 members, and it has now grown to nearly 100,000, with most of the growth coming in just the last few months.

    Loperena called the release a major step forward in the push for full disclosure, crediting Trump for moving the process forward after years of inaction from previous White House administrations. She noted that growing numbers of former military personnel and insiders have come forward with firsthand accounts, even on their deathbeds, making it impossible for the government to continue hiding information indefinitely. “The snowball is getting bigger,” she said, expressing hope that Friday’s release is just the first of many. She also emphasized that any full final disclosure should be bipartisan to overcome U.S. political divides and build public trust in the information released.

    Similar cautious optimism was shared by figures in Texas’s active UFO research community. John Erik Ege, a Texas-based therapist who has been a UAP “experiencer” since childhood and serves as regional director for the Texas chapter of the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON), called the release “a move in the right direction.” While he noted that most of the material released has been widely known among UFO enthusiasts for years, with no new bombshells or concrete evidence of extraterrestrial bodies or contact, he remains hopeful that future releases will bring more clarity. “I don’t think they’re trying to hide anything,” Ege said, adding that he believes Trump is unique among modern presidents in being willing to push forward with disclosure despite potential pushback.

    Daniel Jones, a 36-year-old Texas musician and fellow administrator of the Texas UFO Network’s 25,000-member Facebook page, who got engaged last year at a UFO festival, echoed that sentiment. He said he never expected the first batch of files to contain major revelations, but welcomed the release as a step toward greater government accountability and transparency for the general public, not just the existing UAP research community. “This first batch of files wasn’t, more than likely, going to contain anything extremely substantial,” Jones said, “but I’m hopeful to see more definition on the part of the government” in upcoming releases.

    Not all reactions to the release were positive, however. A small but vocal segment of the UAP community remains skeptical of the government’s motives. Ege noted that roughly 20 percent of active community members believe the release is a false flag effort designed to distract from other issues, stemming from a deep lack of trust in official institutions. Some skeptics within the community went further, criticizing the quality of the materials released. One prominent contributor to a major UAP discussion group noted that many of the released images are heavily compressed, distorted, or lack critical context or scale to identify what is being shown, with some images being reconstructed overlays based on witness testimony rather than original raw imagery of unknown objects. “That is not the same thing as releasing compelling evidence,” the contributor wrote, adding that the release “feels more like theater than disclosure.”

    Even with the mixed reactions, Loperena and other long-time enthusiasts remain optimistic that full disclosure is coming, and that more definitive evidence of extraterrestrial life will eventually be made public. They acknowledge that even with full official disclosure, there will always be naysayers who demand direct, personal proof. “You’re always going to have the naysayers,” Loperena said. “Some of those, it’s going to take an ET to show up and, you know, ask for dinner.” For now, the UAP community is waiting eagerly for the next tranche of declassified files, expected in the coming weeks.

  • Fuel shortages and high prices push adoption of EVs in Africa, led by Ethiopia

    Fuel shortages and high prices push adoption of EVs in Africa, led by Ethiopia

    Across the African continent, electric vehicle adoption is accelerating at an unprecedented rate, driven largely by policy and energy security action in Ethiopia. Severe fuel shortages and skyrocketing global oil prices, worsened by ongoing disruptions tied to the Iran war, have pushed East African nations to accelerate a shift from fossil fuel-powered transport to cleaner, cheaper electric alternatives.

    New data from China’s Ministry of Commerce underscores this rapid growth: total African electric vehicle imports from China jumped to 44,358 units in 2025, more than doubling the 19,386 units imported just one year prior. These shipments carry a total value of over $200 million, with demand concentrated heavily in Ethiopia. In 2024, Addis Ababa implemented a full ban on new imports of gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles, a policy that has reshaped the country’s automotive market. Today, more than 115,000 EVs operate on Ethiopian roads, accounting for roughly 8% of the nation’s entire vehicle fleet. In 2025 alone, Ethiopia accounted for one-third of all African EV imports from China, outpacing major regional markets including South Africa, Egypt, Morocco and Nigeria to claim the top spot.

    The urgency of Ethiopia’s transition stems from deep economic and energy strains. Each year, the country spends roughly $4.2 billion on fossil fuel imports, a burden that has severely drained its limited foreign currency reserves. It also spends up to $128 million monthly on fuel subsidies to cushion consumers from price volatility. The ongoing conflict in Iran has disrupted global oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway that carries roughly one-fifth of all Gulf region oil exports, leaving Ethiopia with a shortfall of more than 180,000 metric tons of fuel annually.

    Faced with these persistent supply shocks, the Ethiopian government has doubled down on its campaign to speed up EV adoption, framing the transition as a critical buffer against external energy market volatility. Industry analysts say the strategy offers clear long-term benefits for the country’s energy sovereignty.

    “From a general perspective, it is sustainable,” explained Hiten Parmar, executive director of The Electric Mission, a South Africa-based e-mobility advocacy organization. “By replacing imported fuel with domestically generated electricity, Ethiopia is strengthening its energy security position.”

    Ethiopia holds a unique advantage in its energy mix that supports a large-scale EV transition: over 90% of its national electricity production comes from renewable sources, primarily hydroelectric and solar power. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, the largest hydroelectric project on the continent, is expected to double the country’s total power generation capacity once fully operational, even as the facility has sparked a decade-long transboundary water dispute with downstream neighbors Egypt and Sudan. Parmar notes that this abundant domestic clean energy generation creates a solid foundation for a widespread shift to electrified transport.

    “It allows EVs to be powered by locally produced clean energy, rather than costly imports,” Parmar said. “By gradually adopting EVs, that intensive fuel import expenditure can be reduced and redirected into other critical development needs.”

    This trend is not isolated to Ethiopia. Governments across the African continent are rolling out policy frameworks and investment plans to support EV adoption: Egypt, South Africa and Morocco have all introduced a mix of consumer incentives, manufacturing investment commitments and clean energy buildout to speed their own energy transitions. According to the Africa E-Mobility Alliance, this early transition is already starting to ease regional pressure on global fuel demand.

    “That’s over 100,000 vehicle owners who are no longer directly exposed to pump price shocks,” said Bob Wesonga, policy and investments lead at the alliance. “In the medium to long term, this creates a buffer against global oil volatility.”

    For consumers and operators that have already made the switch, the cost savings are dramatic. “A private EV owner now spends roughly $4 a month on charging compared to about $27 previously spent on fuel,” Wesonga said. “For public transport operators, the difference is even more striking.”

    Despite these clear benefits and rapid growth, the EV transition across Africa faces significant structural barriers, analysts warn. While EV technology itself is already mature, scaling the necessary supporting infrastructure across vast, often rural landscapes remains a major challenge.

    Ethiopia has begun rolling out ultra-fast charging hubs in its capital Addis Ababa, but expanding this network to every region will require billions in new investment and years of construction. “The biggest hurdle is the last-mile power distribution,” Wesonga explained. “While Ethiopia has a surplus of generation, getting that power reliably to where it’s needed, especially outside Addis Ababa, remains a challenge.”

    Frequent power outages and administrative delays in connecting high-capacity charging stations have slowed infrastructure construction, even as consumer demand for EVs continues to climb. Today, most charging infrastructure remains heavily concentrated in the capital and along a small number of major intercity transport corridors, limiting widespread EV use outside of urban centers and creating a bottleneck for future growth.

    Ethiopia is attempting to address another major barrier, affordability, by building out domestic EV assembly capacity. Official data shows 17 EV assembly plants are already in the national pipeline, with plans to grow that number to 60 by 2030. The strategy is designed to localize production, cut vehicle costs and make EVs accessible to more consumers.

    Even so, affordability remains a major constraint for most households. While operating costs for EVs are far lower than fossil fuel vehicles, upfront purchase prices remain well out of reach for the majority of the population, relative to average national incomes. At the same time, the ban on new fossil fuel vehicle imports has pushed up prices for used combustion engine vehicles, creating additional financial barriers for low-income households looking to purchase any form of private transport.

    Parmar notes that this dynamic could create unintended social consequences if the transition is not carefully managed to protect vulnerable groups. “A national fleet transition is always gradual,” he said. “Existing combustion vehicles will remain in use for some time, and the transition needs to account for livelihoods tied to that system.”

    Even with these near-term challenges, both analysts agree the long-term trajectory of EV adoption across Africa is irreversible. Over time, lower operating and maintenance costs for EVs are expected to bring down overall transport costs, reduce the price of consumer goods and expand access to economic opportunity for millions across the continent. Ethiopia is already drawing lessons from leading EV markets such as China and Norway, where targeted policy support, large-scale infrastructure investment and consumer incentives have driven rapid mass adoption.

    “This is not just about transport,” Wesonga said. “It’s about reshaping how the country uses energy, and who benefits from that shift.”

  • New ‘Nakba’ in Jerusalem: Israel steps up Silwan demolitions near Al-Aqsa

    New ‘Nakba’ in Jerusalem: Israel steps up Silwan demolitions near Al-Aqsa

    Standing amid the crumbled concrete and twisted metal that was once his family home in occupied East Jerusalem, Fakhri Abu Diab’s gaze falls on a small corner where he once shared a warm cup of tea with his mother. For the 55-year-old Palestinian father of five and grandfather of 16, the rubble is more than just destroyed property—it is the erasure of a lifetime of memories, of a childhood spent tending nearby land with his mother, and of the tight-knit community life his family built over generations.

    Abu Diab’s home, located in the al-Bustan neighborhood of Silwan just south of Jerusalem’s Old City and Al-Aqsa Mosque, was demolished by Israeli authorities in early 2024. It is one of dozens of Palestinian homes leveled in the area this year as part of long-running plans to expand Israeli settler infrastructure and build religiously themed national parks. A veteran anti-occupation activist, Abu Diab shared his grief with Middle East Eye: “They demolished my childhood, my memories, and even the scent of my mother.”

    Silwan, a Palestinian district hugging the southern walls of the Old City, has been a flashpoint for Israeli displacement efforts for decades. Alongside other high-risk Palestinian neighborhoods including Sheikh Jarrah to the north of the Old City and Ras al-Amoud to the southeast, Silwan has been the target of systematic state-backed campaigns to clear land for expanding Israeli settlements. For years, sustained Palestinian resistance and international scrutiny slowed the pace of demolitions and expulsions—but that shifted dramatically after the outbreak of the Gaza conflict in October 2023.

    Since that time, Israeli authorities have sharply accelerated home demolitions and forced expulsions across occupied East Jerusalem, with al-Bustan emerging as one of the worst-affected zones. Across the entire city, an estimated 20,000 Palestinian-owned properties currently face active demolition orders. As Israeli forces have also stepped up violent crackdowns on local protest and dissent, Palestinian residents say they are increasingly isolated and defenseless, with little meaningful international support or global media attention focused on their plight. Local residents and rights activists warn that if the current pace of demolitions continues, entire Palestinian communities across Silwan, Sheikh Jarrah and Ras al-Amoud could be completely cleared. This demographic shift would leave Al-Aqsa Mosque surrounded entirely by Israeli settler compounds and biblical parks, cutting the holy site off from its surrounding Palestinian community.

    Today, the scale of destruction in al-Bustan is visible along every narrow, winding street, with piles of rubble and empty flattened lots appearing every few meters. “I used to live here with my wife, my children, and my grandchildren. Ten of us lived in this house,” Abu Diab said. “The suffering is not only in the demolition of the house, but in the demolition of our past, our lives, and our future.”

    The campaign to displace Palestinians from Silwan dates back to 1967, when Israel occupied East Jerusalem and immediately introduced laws that enabled the transfer of Palestinian property to Jewish ownership, while launching large-scale archaeological excavations in the district’s Wadi Hilweh neighborhood. Today, Silwan is home to roughly 55,000 Palestinians spread across 12 neighborhoods covering 6,000 dunams in the Kidron Valley and southern slopes of the Mount of Olives. For decades, three neighborhoods—Wadi Hilweh, al-Bustan and Batn al-Hawa—have borne the brunt of demolition and displacement campaigns, as powerful state-backed settler organizations push to clear the area to expand biblical tourist sites including the “City of David” and the planned “King’s Garden.” Since the early 2000s, more than 2,000 Palestinians across these three neighborhoods have faced expulsion threats, framed either as settler property claims or responses to alleged unpermitted construction. Between 2006 and 2023, Israeli authorities demolished an average of just one to two homes per year in Silwan, held back by ongoing Palestinian resistance and public pressure. But that pace has exploded since October 2023.

    Local residents and researchers confirm that Israeli authorities have demolished 54 homes in al-Bustan alone—more than half of the approximately 115 total homes in the neighborhood—since the Gaza war began. Most of the remaining properties now face imminent demolition. The Jerusalem municipality has adopted increasingly aggressive tactics to push residents out: it gives homeowners strict deadlines to demolish their own homes, imposing heavy financial penalties for any delay, and has openly warned residents that crews will return weekly to carry out demolitions if residents refuse to comply. Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher with Israeli human rights organization Ir Amim, calls the current campaign a devastating escalation that marks a dangerous turning point for Palestinian communities in the area. “The people of Silwan defended their homes for over 20 years, and now they feel they can no longer stop what is happening,” Tatarsky told Middle East Eye. “It increasingly looks as though Israel will wipe out al-Bustan. We do not know how to stop it.”

    The accelerated demolitions in al-Bustan are no accident, Tatarsky explains. The neighborhood, home to roughly 1,500 Palestinians, sits in a strategically critical position: it links the existing heavily guarded settler enclaves of Wadi Hilweh to the northwest and Batn al-Hawa to the east, where 2,500 Israeli settlers already reside. Clearing Palestinians from al-Bustan would create uninterrupted territorial continuity between these existing settler areas, and connect the Silwan settlements directly to West Jerusalem, which lies on the other side of the 1949 Green Line armistice boundary. The ultimate goal, Tatarsky says, is to normalize the erasure of Palestinian Silwan in Israeli public consciousness, rebranding the entire area as an extension of West Jerusalem tied exclusively to biblical Jewish history. “So al-Bustan is central to dramatically changing what Silwan is,” he added.

    Israeli authorities have publicly justified the demolitions by citing building code violations, claiming most Palestinian homes in al-Bustan were constructed without permits. But critics note that permits are effectively impossible for Palestinian residents to obtain under Israeli zoning rules, and the law is enforced selectively against Palestinians while ignoring violations by settler groups. Israeli newspaper Haaretz has reported that demolition orders for multiple al-Bustan properties were suddenly dropped after the land was sold to settler organizations, even as those same groups have been allowed to build an events hall, synagogue, restaurant and visitor center without required permits. The clear end goal, researchers say, is to clear al-Bustan to make way for the “King’s Garden” biblical archaeological park, which will connect to the existing “City of David” tourist complex built on seized Palestinian land in Wadi Hilweh.

    “There is no ownership dispute, no court ruling, and no justification for these executive measures other than transforming a built and inhabited neighbourhood into a park shaped by Zionist religious narratives,” said Ziad Ibhais, a Jerusalem affairs researcher. “That is what makes al-Bustan emblematic of the wider conduct of the occupation municipality in Jerusalem. These powers are being used against Palestinian landowners to impose nationalist-religious visions adopted by the [Israeli] occupation municipality on land over which it has neither sovereignty nor legal authority under international law.”

    International law widely recognizes Israel’s occupation of East Jerusalem as illegal, holding that an occupying power cannot claim sovereignty over occupied territory or make permanent demographic changes to the area. Currently, more than 233,000 Israeli settlers reside in occupied East Jerusalem, alongside more than 500,000 in the occupied West Bank, according to the Israeli NGO Peace Now. All Israeli settlements are widely regarded as a violation of international law.

    Two major settler organizations, Ateret Cohanim founded in 1978 and Elad founded in 1986, lead the displacement campaign in Silwan. Though formally registered as private non-profits, both groups operate with extensive backing from the Israeli state, receiving political support from the Israeli parliament, cooperating closely with Israeli police, and accessing direct government funding. “They are effectively an arm of the state,” Tatarsky noted.

    Palestinian residents have exhausted all available channels to stop the demolitions, bringing multiple legal challenges to both settler claims and municipal plans, and even drafting two alternative community development plans that would preserve existing homes while upgrading neighborhood infrastructure. In a recent proposal, most residents agreed to an extremely strict set of planning concessions to save their neighborhood, in negotiations with the Jerusalem municipality. But the municipality pulled out of talks in February 2024 and announced it would move forward with full demolition plans.

    The collapse of negotiations and lack of legal recourse has left residents in deep despair. Most families whose homes are demolished initially move in with extended relatives, while some manage to rent alternative housing elsewhere in Jerusalem—but skyrocketing housing prices put that option out of reach for many, forcing extended families to scatter across different regions. For Abu Diab, the damage goes far beyond housing insecurity: the displacement has destroyed the traditional Palestinian extended family social structure that sustained generations of residents. “Our way of life is to live together as extended families – with your children, your brothers, your cousins, all close to one another,” he said. “Now we are facing a housing crisis, a psychological crisis, and a health crisis. We have been completely scattered. They have destroyed our social fabric and our support system.”

    Tatarsky argues the accelerated demolitions are only possible because of the current regional context: with the international community focused almost exclusively on the Gaza conflict and many Western powers having signaled implicit support for Israeli actions, the Israeli government feels it can act with complete impunity to push through its long-term demographic goals in East Jerusalem. For Abu Diab, the stakes extend far beyond al-Bustan, extending to the future of Jerusalem’s Palestinian community as a whole. “Al-Bustan matters because it is where we were born and raised, but also because it is the heart of Silwan,” he said. “If Israel takes control of Silwan, it will pave the way for greater control over Al-Aqsa Mosque. If there is no real action, the area will change completely, and there will be a new Nakba for the people of Jerusalem.”

  • Watch: Declassified footage shows ‘unidentified anomalous phenomena’

    Watch: Declassified footage shows ‘unidentified anomalous phenomena’

    Newly declassified video footage capturing what U.S. officials term “unidentified anomalous phenomena,” commonly known as UFOs, has been released to the public, bringing fresh attention to long-running questions about unexplained aerial sightings across the globe. The declassified material, which documents multiple encounters with objects that do not match known aircraft or natural atmospheric phenomena, has reignited public curiosity about potential extraterrestrial activity and gaps in current government knowledge of airspace activity.

    Following the release of the footage, U.S. government agencies confirmed that after comprehensive analysis of the video and related reports from pilots, defense personnel and civilian observers, they have not reached a definitive conclusion about the nature and origin of the events captured on camera. Multiple sightings of these unidentified objects have been recorded in regions across the world, with many documented near sensitive military training areas and commercial flight routes, prompting ongoing review by national security teams.

    The release of the declassified footage marks a continued shift toward greater transparency from the U.S. government regarding UAP investigations, which were largely shrouded in secrecy for decades. While no conclusive evidence of extraterrestrial visitation has been confirmed to date, the lack of a definitive identification has led to ongoing calls for more rigorous, public research into the phenomena to better understand potential risks to national security and advance scientific knowledge.

  • Hovering objects and flashing lights: what we learned from UFO documents released by the Pentagon

    Hovering objects and flashing lights: what we learned from UFO documents released by the Pentagon

    In a historic move aligned with a presidential directive, the U.S. Pentagon has publicly released 161 declassified documents detailing decades of reported unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) — more commonly known as UFOs — spanning sightings from Earth-bound civilians to Apollo astronauts walking on the surface of the moon. Additional files are expected to be made public in the coming months.

    The disclosure, posted Friday to the Department of Defense’s official website, came at the direction of President Donald Trump, who ordered the release earlier this year after noting overwhelming public curiosity around the topic of extraterrestrial life. Trump first announced his plan to declassify the full cache of UAP-related records after growing public pressure for greater federal transparency, a conversation that gained new momentum following comments made by former President Barack Obama in a February interview.

    During that interview, Obama sparked global headlines when he referenced that aliens are “real, but I haven’t seen them.” He later walked back the provocative statement, clarifying that while statistical probability suggests extraterrestrial life could exist elsewhere in the universe, he never encountered any confirmed evidence of alien visitors during his time in office. Within weeks of Obama’s comments, Trump formally instructed the Pentagon to declassify all records related to UAP, UFOs and potential extraterrestrial life.

    The newly released tranche of documents includes decades of internal military memoranda, civilian witness reports, mission transcripts from NASA’s iconic Apollo program, declassified audio recordings, and military footage captured across the globe. Notably, the files contain previously secret communications from three of NASA’s successful moon landing missions in the 1960s and 1970s, all of which document unexplained sightings by astronauts on the lunar surface and in lunar orbit.

    Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin, the second person to walk on the moon, described a puzzling bright light source during his 1969 mission, according to a 1969 interview included in the release. Aldrin told interviewers the object was bright enough to stand out against the black backdrop of space, and the crew initially tentatively attributed it to a possible laser transmission from Earth.

    For Apollo 12, which landed on the moon later in 1969, astronaut Alan Bean reported seeing tiny particles and flashes of light “sailing off in space” that appeared to be “escaping the Moon” from his vantage point on the surface. Apollo 17 astronaut Jack Schmitt, who walked on the moon during the 1972 final mission of the Apollo program, similarly described a display of flashing lights so striking he compared it to a Fourth of July fireworks display. The crew of Apollo 17 ultimately hypothesized the lights could have been reflections from stray fragments of ice, but the observation remains formally unconfirmed.

    The records also date back further than the Apollo program: a 1965 audio recording from the Gemini 7 spaceflight captures astronaut Frank Boman reporting an unidentified object, which he called a “bogey,” alongside “trillions of little particles” floating to the left of his spacecraft to NASA mission control.

    Beyond space missions, the declassified files include dozens of civilian sighting reports collected across decades. One 1957 report to the FBI details a civilian witness account of a large, circular craft rising from the ground, while more recent interviews from 2023 include multiple accounts from U.S. residents describing hovering metal objects that emerged suddenly from bright light. The Pentagon also published previously unreleased 2022 military footage captured in multiple locations across the Middle East, including Iraq, Syria, and the United Arab Emirates, that the DoD labels as “unresolved unidentified anomalous phenomenon.” One clip, filmed at an undisclosed Middle Eastern location, shows an oval-shaped object moving rapidly from left to right across the frame, with the accompanying incident report flagging it as a “possible missile” that was never formally identified.

    Reaction to the release has split along political lines, even among members of the Republican Party who have long pushed for greater UAP transparency. Congressman Tim Burchett of Tennessee, a leading GOP advocate for UAP disclosure, praised the release in a post on X, calling it a “great start” toward greater government openness. Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, another transparency advocate, similarly called the disclosure “a massive first step in the right direction.”

    Not all political figures welcomed the move, however. Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a once-close ally of Trump who has since split with the president and left Congress, argued the disclosure was a deliberate distraction from far more urgent issues facing American voters, including persistent price inflation and ongoing conflict in Iran. “I’m so sick of the ‘look at the shiny object’ propaganda,” Greene wrote in a post on X.

    The release comes amid a years-long resurgence of public and congressional interest in UAP in the United States. In 2022, Congress held the first formal hearings on UFOs in more than half a century, and the U.S. military has repeatedly committed to increasing transparency around unexplained sightings reported by military personnel and pilots.

  • War in the Middle East: latest developments

    War in the Middle East: latest developments

    On a day marked by rapidly shifting geopolitical friction across the Middle East, multiple interconnected developments unfolded Friday, amplifying concerns over regional stability and global energy security.

    The most direct military action came from U.S. forces, which confirmed they had disabled two Iran-flagged cargo tankers that attempted to breach an American blockade of Iranian ports, a restriction that has been in place since mid-April. According to a statement posted on social platform X by U.S. Central Command, a Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet struck the vessels with precision munitions targeted at their smokestacks, successfully stopping the non-compliant ships from reaching Iranian territorial waters. This incident brings the total number of vessels forcibly halted by U.S. forces for alleged blockade violations to four.

    In a diplomatic push following the strike, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called on European NATO allies to take on a larger share of responsibility for securing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil supplies pass. Speaking after a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Rubio argued that Iranian efforts to assert unilateral control over the international waterway are unacceptable to the global community. He also raised questions about alliance commitments, noting that a core purpose of NATO’s U.S. force deployments in Europe has long been the ability to project power to regional contingencies, and that failure to address current threats requires a re-examination of this arrangement.

    Iran, for its part, has framed its influence over the strait as a major strategic advantage. Mohammad Mokhber, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, described control of the Strait of Hormuz as an opportunity as valuable as an atomic bomb, emphasizing that holding sway over a chokepoint that can directly move the global economy represents an unmatched strategic lever for the country.

    Diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions are already underway, with Qatar’s prime minister traveling to Washington Friday for talks with U.S. Vice President JD Vance. A source familiar with the closed-door meeting, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that the discussions would center on U.S.-Qatar bilateral relations, the unfolding standoff over Iran, global liquefied natural gas (LNG) market stability, and broader regional security. Qatar has served as a key neutral intermediary between the U.S. and Iran in past diplomatic engagements.

    Alongside the standoff over Hormuz, cross-border violence between Israel and Lebanese militant group Hezbollah continued to flare, despite recent truce efforts. Hezbollah announced Friday that it had launched a missile attack on an Israeli military base located south of Nahariya in northern Israel, saying the strike was carried out in retaliation for recent Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon and the southern suburbs of Beirut. Shortly after the Hezbollah announcement, Lebanon’s civil defence rescue organization confirmed one of its members had been killed in an Israeli airstrike on southern Lebanon, near the village of El Qlaile where video footage shows thick smoke rising from the impact site.

    In another setback for U.S. regional military operations, two anonymous Saudi sources told Agence France-Presse that Riyadh has prohibited the U.S. from using Saudi airspace and military bases for operations aimed at reopening the Strait of Hormuz. The sources clarified, however, that U.S. access to Saudi infrastructure and airspace remains intact for all other military and security purposes.

    The escalating tensions have already rippled into global economic policy, with the European Union announcing new rules Friday to protect airline passengers amid spiking fuel costs driven by Middle East supply fears. The EU made clear that airlines will no longer be allowed to add retroactive fuel surcharges to tickets that have already been purchased by customers. Separately, the EU Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) updated its rules to approve widespread use of Jet A, a U.S.-produced aviation fuel that was previously only permitted in Europe for return flights originating in the United States, a move designed to expand available fuel supplies amid potential shortages.

    Closing out the day’s developments, the United Arab Emirates confirmed that a recent Iranian attack using drones and missiles against the country left three people with moderate injuries, marking the latest direct escalation between Iran and Gulf Arab states.

  • India mends ties with Turkey after year of tension over Pakistan

    India mends ties with Turkey after year of tension over Pakistan

    One year ago, a landmark bilateral conference hosted by an Ankara-based Turkish think tank brought Indian and Turkish experts and officials together for the first time, opening with a wave of cautious optimism. Attendees on both sides leaned into shared historical bonds, recalling India’s early support for Turkey’s War of Independence, and even celebrated linguistic commonalities between the two nations, including overlapping terms like *hava* (meaning air) and *kısmet* (meaning fate). The gathering was explicitly designed to reignite closer cooperation between the two major emerging economies, which had managed to grow bilateral trade for years despite long-standing political friction rooted in conflicting geopolitical alliances. The core tension stemmed from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s close partnership with Pakistan and the broader Muslim world, which clashed with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s deepening strategic alignment with Israel. By all accounts, the conference was a striking success – but that success stoked immediate regional friction: multiple sources confirm Pakistani officials expressed frustration at being sidelined and not consulted ahead of the event.

  • Trump says Russia and Ukraine have agreed to his request for a 3-day ceasefire and a prisoner swap

    Trump says Russia and Ukraine have agreed to his request for a 3-day ceasefire and a prisoner swap

    In a surprise diplomatic announcement from Washington D.C. on Friday, former and current U.S. President Donald Trump said he had secured a tentative agreement from both the Russian and Ukrainian leadership for a 72-hour ceasefire and a large-scale prisoner of war exchange, framing the temporary halt to hostilities as a potential turning point in the three-year conflict between the two nations.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy quickly confirmed the deal in his own public statement, though as of Friday evening, no official confirmation or comment had been issued by Russian President Vladimir Putin or the Kremlin. Per Trump’s social media announcement, the ceasefire will run from Saturday through Monday, aligning with Russia’s annual Victory Day holiday marking the Soviet Union’s defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.

    “I am pleased to announce that there will be a THREE DAY CEASEFIRE (May 9th, 10th, and 11th) in the War between Russia and Ukraine,” Trump wrote on his social platform. “The Celebration in Russia is for Victory Day but, likewise, in Ukraine, because they were also a big part and factor of World War II.”

    The Republican president outlined that the ceasefire terms call for a full suspension of all offensive kinetic military operations across the front lines, paired with a reciprocal exchange of 1,000 prisoners of war from each side. The announcement comes on the heels of two earlier, short-lived unilateral ceasefire attempts — one from Russia earlier last week, and one from Ukraine — both of which collapsed within hours, with each side blaming the other for continued combat operations.

    Trump told reporters that he personally delivered the ceasefire request directly to both heads of state, adding, “Hopefully, it is the beginning of the end of a very long, deadly, and hard fought War.” The president also noted that broader negotiations to end the full conflict, which first erupted in February 2022, remain ongoing, saying, “we are getting closer and closer every day.” This marks a shift from Trump’s earlier inconsistent framing of the war: he has alternated between optimistic promises of a quick end to fighting and public statements suggesting Russia and Ukraine should be left to fight until one side achieves total victory.

    For Zelenskyy, the primary draw of the agreement is the chance to repatriate hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners of war, a core policy priority for the Kyiv government throughout the entire conflict. In a post on his official Telegram channel, Zelenskyy emphasized that freeing captured Ukrainian personnel outweighs any strategic concerns about Russia’s holiday celebrations. “Red Square matters less to us than the lives of Ukrainian prisoners of war who can be brought home,” he wrote.

    Shortly after his initial confirmation, Zelenskyy issued a formal presidential decree authorizing Russia to hold its traditional Victory Day military parade on Moscow’s Red Square, declaring the site a no-strike zone for Ukrainian forces for the duration of the event. Analysts view the decree’s framing as a deliberate choice to highlight Kyiv’s proven ability to strike targets deep within Russian territory, including the capital, while tying Ukraine’s military restraint directly to the new ceasefire agreement.

    Zelenskyy confirmed the deal was negotiated through U.S.-mediated diplomatic channels, publicly thanking Trump and the American negotiation team for what he called effective diplomatic engagement. He added that Kyiv is relying on Washington to enforce Russian compliance with the agreed terms. “We are counting on the United States to ensure that Russia fulfills its commitments,” Zelenskyy said, noting he had already instructed his national security team to complete all necessary preparations for the prisoner exchange without delay.

    Trump’s optimistic announcement comes just hours after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio offered a far more pessimistic assessment of ongoing peace talks during a press availability at the end of an official visit to Rome and the Vatican. Rubio told reporters that U.S. mediation efforts to end the four-year war had not yet yielded a productive breakthrough. “While we’re prepared to play whatever role we can to bring it to a peaceful diplomatic resolution, unfortunately right now, those efforts have stagnated,” Rubio said. “But we always stand ready if those circumstances change.”

    This report included contributions from Associated Press correspondents Hanna Arhirova in Kyiv and Giada Zampano in Rome.

  • UAE’s ruling al-Nayhan family receives tens of millions in EU farming subsidies

    UAE’s ruling al-Nayhan family receives tens of millions in EU farming subsidies

    A new joint investigation by independent climate and energy investigative outlet DeSmog, alongside European news partners El Diario and G4Media, has uncovered that the ruling royal family of the United Arab Emirates, the Al-Nahyan family, has collected more than €71 million ($84 million) in European Union agricultural subsidies over the past six years for farmland holdings across Romania, Italy and Spain. The investigation, which analyzed six years of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) beneficiary data between 2019 and 2024, traced 110 separate subsidy payments to a complex network of companies and subsidiaries controlled directly by the Al-Nahyan family and Abu Dhabi’s flagship sovereign holding firm ADQ.

    The Al-Nahyan family ranks as the second wealthiest royal family in the world, with a combined estimated net worth exceeding $320 billion, built almost entirely on the UAE’s massive untapped oil and natural gas reserves. The CAP, the EU’s flagship agricultural support program, distributes roughly $64 billion in annual payments to support European farmers and rural development, accounting for nearly one-third of the EU’s entire total annual budget. Industry analysts have long raised concerns that large shares of these public funds end up in the hands of wealthy foreign investors rather than small, local European agricultural operations, a finding this new investigation reinforces.

    The single largest subsidy haul uncovered by the investigation went to Romanian agribusiness firm Agricost, which operates the largest contiguous individual farm in the European Union, spanning 57,000 hectares — an area five times larger than the city of Paris. DeSmog’s analysis confirms that the vast imbalance in CAP distribution heavily favors large landowners: in 2024 alone, Agricost received more than $10 million in direct CAP payments, a sum more than 1,600 times higher than the average annual subsidy collected by a typical small EU farm.

    Over the past 15 years, the UAE has accelerated a global campaign of agricultural land acquisition, purchasing hundreds of thousands of hectares of fertile farmland across Africa, South America and Europe. Today, the UAE controls roughly 960,000 hectares of agricultural land worldwide, a push driven by the country’s urgent domestic food security needs. The Gulf nation’s harsh climate, characterized by extreme high temperatures, widespread chronic water scarcity, and nutrient-poor sandy soils, makes large-scale domestic crop production nearly unfeasible, leaving the country dependent on imports for as much as 90 percent of its total food supply.

    This global land grab has also sparked geopolitical controversy, with many analysts linking the UAE’s push for agricultural resources to its controversial involvement in the ongoing Sudan conflict, where Abu Dhabi backs the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary group that has been widely accused of perpetrating genocide against civilian populations. The UAE already holds extensive agricultural holdings in Sudan: UAE’s largest listed firm International Holding Company (IHC) and Jenaan Investment operate more than 50,000 hectares of farmland in the country, while the massive Abu Hamad agricultural project, a joint venture between IHC and Sudan’s largest private firm Dal Group, controls an additional 162,000 hectares of cultivated land. The project is paired with a newly built Red Sea shipping terminal, Abu Amama Port, constructed and operated by Abu Dhabi-based AD Ports Group to facilitate export of Sudanese agricultural produce.

    Within the EU, the Al-Nahyan family’s agricultural expansion is structured through three core holding companies based in Spain, Italy and Romania. Agricost, the giant Romanian farm operation, was acquired by leading UAE agribusiness group Al Dahra in 2018 for an estimated €230 million ($270 million). Al Dahra was originally founded by Hamdan bin Zayed Al Nahyan, brother of UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, before ADQ purchased a 50 percent stake in the firm in 2020. While full public details of Al Dahra’s current ownership structure are not available, DeSmog confirms the firm remains closely linked to members of the Al-Nahyan family: its board is chaired by Hamdan bin Zayed Al Nahyan, with his son Zayed bin Hamdan Al Nahyan — who is married to President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan’s daughter — also holding a key leadership role.

    DeSmog’s investigation also found that Al Dahra has acquired multiple agricultural operations across Spain since 2012, controlling more than 8,000 hectares of Spanish farmland that collected more than €5 million in CAP subsidies between 2015 and 2024. Both the Spanish and Romanian farm operations grow alfalfa and other animal feed crops, with the vast majority of produce destined for export, including shipment to the Gulf. Al Dahra holds a long-term government contract to supply animal feed to the UAE, which supports the country’s fast-growing domestic dairy sector. In 2022, ADQ also acquired major global fruit producer Unifrutti for an estimated $830 million. DeSmog’s analysis found that Unifrutti’s Italian farm holdings received at least €186,000 in CAP subsidies in the three years following the acquisition.

    Neither the Al-Nahyan family nor any of the companies named in the investigation responded to multiple requests for comment from DeSmog, with ADQ formally declining to issue a statement.

  • Greece’s examines mystery naval drone found in Ionian Sea

    Greece’s examines mystery naval drone found in Ionian Sea

    A newly surfaced unexplained naval drone recovered from Greek waters has reignited questions over the expanding scope of the Russia-Ukraine conflict beyond Black Sea coastlines. Local fishermen first spotted the uncrewed vessel on Thursday, tucked into a rocky cave off the Ionian Sea island of Lefkada, before alerting Greek authorities, the coast guard towed the several-metre craft to the nearby port of Vasiliki, where military investigators have now taken custody of it under the supervision of Greece’s defense ministry.

    Social media footage of the recovery shows the dark, unmarked drone being towed into the harbor, with its top hatch open and no identifying symbols visible to confirm its origin. Initial Greek media reports indicate the craft carried explosive ordnance, and its engine was still operational when fishermen found it, fueling speculation that it drifted into Greek territorial waters only recently. Military experts are now examining two leading theories about how the drone ended up off Lefkada: that it suffered a technical malfunction or lost communication with its ground control station.

    Local outlet Ta Nea has drawn a visual comparison between the recovered craft and Ukraine’s widely documented MAGURA V5 naval drone, a system Kyiv’s forces have used repeatedly to target Russian military and commercial vessels. That assessment has not yet been independently verified, and the BBC has reached out to both Greek and Ukrainian defense authorities for official comment on the discovery.

    One prominent hypothesis under investigation suggests the drone was intended to target vessels part of Russia’s so-called shadow fleet, a loose network of hundreds of oil and gas tankers that Moscow uses to bypass Western sanctions imposed following its 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Uncrewed naval drones have reshaped naval warfare in the two and a half years since the invasion began, allowing Ukraine to strike Russian assets far from its own coastline. In November 2025, Kyiv confirmed it used sea drones to attack two Russian oil tankers under Western sanctions in the Black Sea, with publicly verified footage showing the drones striking their targets before detonating in large fireballs. Just months earlier, in March 2026, Russia accused Ukraine of launching an uncrewed drone attack on a Russian sanctioned LNG tanker in the Mediterranean Sea between Libya and Malta. The Arctic Metagaz suffered severe damage in that alleged attack and was left drifting uncontrolled without crew on board, though Ukraine never claimed responsibility for the strike thousands of kilometers from its coast.

    As Greek investigators continue their analysis of the recovered drone, the discovery highlights how the spillover effects of the Russia-Ukraine war are increasingly being felt across the Mediterranean, bringing unplanned security risks to neutral coastal states.