分类: world

  • Israeli strike in south Lebanon kills 17 medical staff

    Israeli strike in south Lebanon kills 17 medical staff

    A direct Israeli military strike on a primary healthcare center in the southern Lebanese village of Burj Qalawiyeh has resulted in the deaths of 17 medical personnel, according to statements from Lebanese health authorities on Saturday. The attack, which occurred late Friday in the Bint Jbeil district, claimed the lives of doctors, nurses, and paramedics performing critical medical duties.

    Lebanon’s Health Ministry has formally accused Israel of systematically targeting emergency medical teams during rescue operations, reporting that 31 paramedics have been killed since hostilities began on March 2. The ministry’s statement condemned what it characterized as repeated attacks on healthcare infrastructure and personnel.

    The Israeli military, through its Arabic-language spokesperson Avichay Adraee, countered these allegations by asserting that Hezbollah has been utilizing ambulances for military purposes. Adraee issued warnings that Israel would continue to target any medical facilities or vehicles believed to be supporting Hezbollah’s military operations.

    This incident represents the most significant single loss of medical life since the conflict erupted following Hezbollah’s rocket attacks against Israel, which the group stated were in retaliation for the killing of Iran’s supreme leader. The ongoing violence has triggered massive displacement, with approximately one million people forced from their homes across southern Lebanon and parts of Beirut according to the Norwegian Refugee Council, affecting roughly 14% of Lebanon’s territory.

    The humanitarian crisis continues to deepen with Lebanon’s Health Ministry reporting 826 fatalities, including 65 women and 106 children, and 2,009 wounded since the conflict’s inception. In a separate incident Friday night, a family of six including four children were killed in an airstrike on their home in Nabatieh.

    In a significant escalation, Israeli forces destroyed a bridge over the Litani River, describing it as a “key crossing” for Hezbollah operations despite providing no concrete evidence. This marks the first acknowledged attack on Lebanese public infrastructure since the conflict began. Simultaneously, Israel distributed leaflets over Beirut threatening “Gaza-scale devastation” and further infrastructure attacks unless Hezbollah is disarmed, with Defense Minister Israel Katz warning that Lebanon’s government would “pay increasing costs through damage to infrastructure and loss of territory.”

  • Russia exploiting Iran war, Zelensky says after fresh bombardment

    Russia exploiting Iran war, Zelensky says after fresh bombardment

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has issued a stark warning that Russia is capitalizing on the ongoing Middle East conflict to escalate its assault on Ukraine, creating what he described as an opportunity for “even greater destruction” in Europe. This statement followed Russia’s latest large-scale aerial offensive overnight into Saturday, which resulted in significant casualties and infrastructure damage across multiple regions.

    The coordinated assault involved approximately 500 drones and missiles targeting Ukrainian territory, with interception systems successfully neutralizing most projectiles. Despite these defensive efforts, the attacks claimed at least five lives and left numerous civilians injured. The Kyiv region suffered particularly severe impacts, with energy infrastructure serving as the primary target alongside civilian structures including residential buildings, educational facilities, and businesses.

    President Zelensky emphasized the critical need for enhanced air-defense capabilities, characterizing them as a “daily necessity” for Ukraine’s survival. His urgent appeal for accelerated weapons deliveries comes amid concerns that missile depletion in the Middle East—where U.S.-aligned Gulf states are countering Iranian attacks—could severely impact Ukraine’s defensive capabilities.

    The geopolitical ramifications extend beyond immediate security concerns. Iran’s effective blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has triggered global oil supply disruptions, driving prices to approximately $100 per barrel. In response, the Trump administration temporarily suspended sanctions on Russian oil already loaded onto vessels, a move that has drawn criticism from Zelensky and European leaders while receiving Moscow’s endorsement.

    Furthermore, U.S.-led peace initiatives aimed at resolving the four-year conflict in Ukraine have been effectively derailed by the expanding Middle East hostilities, creating additional diplomatic complications for all involved parties.

  • Three more Iran football team members change minds over asylum

    Three more Iran football team members change minds over asylum

    In a significant reversal, three additional members of Iran’s women’s football delegation have withdrawn their applications for humanitarian protection in Australia and will return to Iran. The individuals have been identified by diaspora human rights activists as players Mona Hamoudi and Zahra Sarbali, along with technical staff member Zahra Soltan Meshkehkar.

    The initial asylum bids followed a politically charged incident during the Asian Cup tournament, where the team’s silent protest during Iran’s national anthem before their March 2nd match against South Korea drew severe criticism back home. Iranian state media labeled them “war traitors,” raising international concerns about potential repercussions.

    Australian Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke confirmed the developments, stating his government had “done everything it could to ensure the women were given the chance to have a safe future in the country.” He emphasized that while Australia provided genuine choices and supportive authorities, the players were making decisions within a difficult context beyond Australia’s control.

    Iran’s Sports Ministry celebrated the returns as a victory, claiming in an official statement that “the national spirit and patriotism of the Iranian women’s national football team defeated the enemy’s plans.” The ministry additionally accused Australia’s government of “playing in Trump’s field,” suggesting geopolitical motivations behind the asylum offers.

    The IRGC-linked Tasnim News Agency, which first broke the story, reported the three women were en route to Kuala Lumpur to rejoin their squad after “resisting psychological warfare, extensive propaganda and seductive offers.” Their departure reduces the number of remaining defectors from the original seven to just three, following another player’s decision to return on Wednesday.

    The situation developed after five team members initially refused to return following Iran’s elimination from the tournament, slipping away from minders at their Gold Coast hotel and being secured by Australian Federal Police. The remaining Iranian players departed Australia on Tuesday night, concluding a tournament that became unexpectedly politicized.

  • Trump urges UK and other nations to send warships to Strait of Hormuz

    Trump urges UK and other nations to send warships to Strait of Hormuz

    Former US President Donald Trump has issued a forceful appeal for a multinational naval coalition to secure the strategic Strait of Hormuz, following a series of attacks on commercial shipping that have disrupted global oil supplies. In posts on his Truth Social platform, Trump specifically called upon the United Kingdom, China, France, Japan, and South Korea to deploy warships to safeguard this critical maritime corridor.

    The urgency of Trump’s request stems from escalating hostilities between the US-Israel alliance and Iran, which have transformed the world’s busiest oil shipping channel into a conflict zone. Since the war began on February 28th, UK Maritime Trade Operations has documented at least 16 attacks on vessels in and around the strait, through which approximately 20% of global oil shipments typically pass.

    Tehran has explicitly stated its intention to maintain a blockade of the waterway as part of its military strategy. Iranian officials have warned that any tanker bound for the US, Israel, or their partners constitutes a legitimate target. This declaration came alongside intensified attacks on energy infrastructure throughout the Gulf region.

    Trump’s rhetoric remained characteristically combative, asserting that while “100% of Iran’s military capability” had been destroyed, the nation still posed a threat through potential drone attacks, mine deployments, or close-range missile strikes. He promised continued US military action, including bombing Iranian shoreline positions and engaging Iranian vessels, while offering “a lot” of support to nations participating in the proposed coalition.

    The UK Ministry of Defence responded cautiously, indicating they were discussing “a range of options to ensure the security of shipping in the region” with allied nations. This diplomatic language contrasted sharply with Trump’s previous comments, in which he stated he “couldn’t care less” whether allies contributed more to the war effort and accused UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer of seeking to “join wars after we’ve already won.”

    International reactions revealed further complexities. French President Emmanuel Macron previously expressed willingness to deploy warships for escort missions, but only after the most “intense phase of the conflict” had concluded. Meanwhile, Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey urged Prime Minister Starmer to resist pressure from Trump, emphasizing that deployment decisions should be based solely on UK national interests and subject to parliamentary approval.

    The strategic implications are substantial. Currently, not even the US Navy is escorting tankers through the narrow shipping lane, reflecting the dangerous operational environment. The effective closure of the strait and attacks on energy infrastructure have already triggered significant increases in global oil prices, demonstrating the economic vulnerability created by the regional conflict.

  • War in the Middle East: latest developments

    War in the Middle East: latest developments

    The Middle East conflict has entered a dangerous new phase with multiple fronts of escalation, according to latest developments verified by international agencies. Regional tensions have intensified following a series of drone and missile attacks targeting critical infrastructure across several nations.

    In a significant maritime security development, former US President Donald Trump has called upon multiple nations including China, France, Japan, South Korea, and Britain to deploy naval assets to secure the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil transit corridor. This request comes amid heightened threats to energy infrastructure throughout the region.

    Airport and military facilities have become prime targets in the escalating conflict. Kuwait’s international airport sustained drone strikes that damaged its radar systems, while a separate attack on a Kuwaiti airbase housing US military personnel resulted in injuries to Kuwaiti staff and significant property damage. Simultaneously, the United Arab Emirates reported attacks on its energy installations in Fujairah and its consulate in Iraqi Kurdistan, marking the second assault on the diplomatic compound within a week.

    The missile warfare between Iran and Israel has reached unprecedented levels. Iranian state television confirmed new missile launches toward Israel, while Jordan’s military reported intercepting 79 out of 85 projectiles targeting its territory. Explosions were heard over Jerusalem as Israel’s defense systems activated against incoming threats.

    Casualty figures continue to mount with Lebanon’s health ministry reporting 826 fatalities, including 106 children and 65 women, with an additional 2,009 wounded in ongoing hostilities with Hezbollah. An alleged US-Israeli strike on Isfahan’s industrial sector reportedly killed 15 people, though independent verification remains pending.

    Diplomatic channels show increasing strain as Turkey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan accused Iran of denying responsibility for ballistic missile launches toward Turkish territory despite technical evidence. Meanwhile, Iran’s envoy to Ukraine dismissed Kyiv’s support for US and Gulf allies in countering drones as ‘a joke’ in comments to AFP.

    UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, during his Beirut visit, emphasized that diplomatic options remain available to resolve the Israel-Hezbollah conflict while urging international support for Lebanon. In a notable development, Hamas publicly appealed to Iran to refrain from targeting neighboring countries while acknowledging Tehran’s right to self-defense against Israel and the United States.

    Oil operations from Iran’s Kharg Island continue normally despite recent attacks on the export hub, according to regional officials. The situation remains fluid with the US embassy in Baghdad also reporting a drone strike, as confirmed by Iraqi security sources and witnessed by AFP journalists.

  • Fear grips Iranians as missiles fall and loyalist forces roam the streets

    Fear grips Iranians as missiles fall and loyalist forces roam the streets

    Beneath the ongoing aerial conflict between the US-Israeli alliance and Iran, a profound internal crisis is unfolding within Iranian urban centers. In the fortnight since the demise of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, a palpable climate of apprehension has taken root among civilians, who now find themselves caught between external military threats and an increasingly aggressive domestic security apparatus.

    Pro-government paramilitary units and security forces have established a pervasive presence nationwide. These elements, including the Basij volunteer militia, now routinely stage orchestrated rallies, erect countless checkpoints, and directly confront citizens on public streets. This strategic mobilization has been openly encouraged by Iranian officials; Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf publicly urged loyalists to demonstrate their ‘presence in the streets’ via social media, a directive analysts interpret as an effort to project unwavering control after a significant leadership vacuum.

    The human impact of this strategy is severe and widespread. Personal accounts gathered from multiple cities describe a terrifying reality. Seema, a 42-year-old mother from Yazd, recounted being trapped in her car with her young son by motorcyclists chanting pro-regime slogans, who proceeded to violently assault her vehicle. In Tehran, residents like Ali describe an ‘oppressive’ and ‘toxic’ atmosphere, where young, armed volunteers man checkpoints to interrogate citizens with ‘pointless questions.’ The recent Quds Day rallies, an annual pro-Palestine event, were further stage-managed, with participants reportedly bused in to create an illusion of massive popular support for television broadcasts.

    Simultaneously, Iranian security officials have issued stark warnings against any form of dissent. National Police Chief Ahmad Reza Radan explicitly threatened to treat anyone protesting at the ‘enemy’s request’ as an enemy combatant. This has effectively ceded control of public spaces to regime loyalists, leaving ordinary Iranians feeling silenced and endangered. The situation is compounded by the fact that these very checkpoints and security installations have become secondary targets in the international conflict, with Israeli strikes hitting such positions in Tehran, raising the grim specter of civilian casualties.

    This convergence of external war and internal crackdown has generated complex and conflicting emotions among the populace. While many express deep-seated anger towards the regime’s repressive tactics, there is also growing disillusionment with foreign military action, which is seen as indifferent to civilian lives. As one Tehran resident, Ghazaleh, starkly summarized, citizens feel ‘trapped between two groups of criminals,’ where neither the Islamic Republic nor its international adversaries prioritize the welfare of the Iranian people. The prevailing fear is that the nation may endure the devastation of war only to emerge with an even more brutal and entrenched government.

  • Iranians grapple with whether to flee the country because of the war

    Iranians grapple with whether to flee the country because of the war

    KAPIKOY BORDER CROSSING, Turkey — Merve Pourkaz, a 32-year-old hairdresser from Iran’s eastern city of Golestan, made the arduous 1,500-kilometer journey to this alpine border crossing after explosions rocked her neighborhood. Her destination: the relative safety of Van, Turkey. ‘If they permit me, I’ll remain in Van until the war concludes,’ she told The Associated Press. ‘Otherwise, I may return home to face whatever fate awaits.’

    Pourkaz represents one of approximately 3.2 million Iranians internally displaced since the outbreak of the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran, according to UN estimates. While many seek refuge within Iran’s borders or in neighboring nations, a counter-movement sees citizens returning from abroad to protect familial homes and loved ones.

    Current migration patterns reveal complexity: UN data indicates only about 1,300 Iranians cross into Turkey daily, with some days witnessing more returnees than departures. However, neighboring countries and European nations are developing contingency plans amid concerns that prolonged conflict could trigger a full-scale migration crisis.

    This duality of movement is embodied by individuals like Leila Rabetnezhadfard, 45, who abandoned wedding preparations in Istanbul to return to her family in Shiraz, southern Iran. ‘How could I feel secure in Istanbul while my family endures wartime conditions?’ she questioned, citing practical constraints including limited housing space, medical needs, and high costs.

    The International Organization for Migration reports that while large-scale exodus hasn’t materialized, significant internal displacement continues toward rural areas near the Caspian Sea. Salvador Gutierrez, IOM’s mission chief in Iran, attributes this to ‘people prioritizing family unity, safety concerns, and logistical limitations.’

    Experts warn that infrastructure collapse could change this calculus dramatically. ‘If Tehran, a metropolis of 10 million, loses water supply, population movement becomes inevitable,’ noted Alex Vatanka of the Middle East Institute. Such development could strain borders with Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Turkey, and Iraq.

    Turkey, having absorbed millions during Syria’s civil war under its previous open-door policy, has adopted a different approach. Reports indicate preparations for border ‘buffer zones’ and temporary settlements, complemented by enhanced border security including 380 kilometers of concrete barriers and numerous observation posts.

    European officials simultaneously grapple with the potential renewal of the 2016 EU-Turkey migration agreement, which provided €6 billion for refugee support in exchange for border control. This comes amid rising anti-immigrant sentiment in Europe and fresh displacement crises elsewhere in the region, including over 800,000 displaced in Lebanon.

    Humanitarian organizations express alarm over dwindling resources. ‘We face potential grave humanitarian consequences precisely when funding has been severely reduced,’ stated Ninette Kelley of the World Refugee & Migration Council, highlighting concerns about global readiness for another large-scale displacement event.

  • Pakistan’s president says Afghan Taliban forces crossed a ‘red line’ with drone attacks on civilians

    Pakistan’s president says Afghan Taliban forces crossed a ‘red line’ with drone attacks on civilians

    Tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan’s Taliban government have dramatically escalated into open hostilities, with both sides exchanging aerial attacks across their shared border. The conflict reached a critical turning point when Afghan drones struck Pakistani territory, prompting President Asif Ali Zardari to declare that Kabul had “crossed a red line” and brought “grave consequences upon itself.

    The recent violence represents the deadliest fighting between the neighboring nations to date, with Pakistan reporting intercepted drones causing civilian injuries in Quetta and other areas. Simultaneously, Afghanistan alleges Pakistani airstrikes killed six civilians and wounded fifteen in Kabul and eastern regions. Kabul claims its air force subsequently targeted military installations near Islamabad and northwestern Pakistan in retaliation.

    Pakistan maintains its operations specifically target Pakistani Taliban militants and their support networks, denying any intentional strikes against civilians. Islamabad has characterized the situation as an “open war,” raising international concerns about regional stability amid broader Middle East tensions.

    Complicating the conflict, Afghanistan alleges Pakistani aircraft struck fuel depots belonging to private airline Kam Air near Kandahar airport, which reportedly supplies both civilian and United Nations flights. Pakistan counters that the Afghan Taliban government provides sanctuary to militant groups operating across the porous border, including those allied with India—a charge Kabul denies.

    The human cost continues to mount, with seven Pakistani police officers killed by a roadside bomb in Lakki Marwat district on Friday. Despite diplomatic efforts by China and Turkey to broker a ceasefire, the violence shows no signs of abating. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has urged peaceful resolution, warning that military action exacerbates tensions and threatens regional stability. China’s special envoy is currently shuttling between both nations promoting restraint, while Afghanistan’s foreign minister has expressed preference for dialogue over military conflict.

    Previous mediation attempts, including a Qatari-brokered ceasefire in October that temporarily reduced tensions, and subsequent talks in Turkey, have failed to produce a lasting agreement.

  • US embassy in Iraq hit as Mideast War enters third week

    US embassy in Iraq hit as Mideast War enters third week

    The Middle East conflict entered its third week with escalating violence, marked by a drone strike on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and significant disruptions to global energy supply lines. Iranian forces issued warnings to Emirati civilians to avoid port areas, coinciding with visible clouds of black smoke rising from Fujairah—a critical Emirati port housing oil storage and export terminals.

    This embassy attack represents the second assault since February 28, when U.S. and Israeli operations against Iran ignited widespread regional hostilities. The ongoing warfare has reportedly claimed over 1,200 lives in Iran and displaced approximately 3.2 million people, according to UN estimates. Despite superior U.S. and Israeli military capabilities, Iran continues its offensive operations, targeting at least ten neighboring nations and effectively blocking the strategic Strait of Hormuz to maritime traffic.

    The economic repercussions have been immediate and severe, with crude oil prices surging more than 40% since the conflict’s inception. Iranian media has threatened that U.S.-linked energy facilities would be “immediately destroyed” if Iranian oil infrastructure were targeted, though Teheran confirmed no damage to facilities on Kharg Island following U.S. strikes.

    President Trump announced plans for U.S. Navy escorts through the Strait of Hormuz to restore oil exports, while the Pentagon reported striking over 15,000 targets in Iran during the past two weeks. Israel’s military claimed responsibility for 7,600 strikes, primarily targeting Iran’s missile program.

    The conflict has expanded beyond the Gulf region, with Turkey reporting NATO forces intercepting ballistic missiles launched from Iran. Lebanon has been drawn into the hostilities, with Israeli strikes killing healthcare workers and targeting Hezbollah strongholds. Qatar intercepted missiles above Doha, while Saudi Arabia reported downing dozens of drones.

    Notably, Hamas urged Iran to exercise restraint regarding neighboring countries, creating a rare diplomatic rift between the allies. Within Iran, the Revolutionary Guards have threatened severe crackdowns on anti-government protests, maintaining an internet blackout since the conflict began.

  • Russian strike on the Kyiv region kills 4 and wounds at least 15, with peace talks stalled

    Russian strike on the Kyiv region kills 4 and wounds at least 15, with peace talks stalled

    KYIV, Ukraine — A severe overnight missile and drone offensive struck the Kyiv region, resulting in at least four fatalities and injuring 15 individuals, with three victims in critical condition. Mykola Kalashnyk, head of the regional administration, confirmed the assault damaged residential areas, educational facilities, enterprises, and critical infrastructure across four districts.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy identified energy infrastructure as the primary target, revealing Russia launched approximately 430 drones and 68 missiles. This escalation occurs amid heightened global tensions following the U.S. postponement of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, attributed to the ongoing Middle East conflict.

    Analysts observe Moscow strategically benefits from Middle East hostilities through surging global energy prices, while potentially diverting Western attention and military resources away from Ukraine. Zelenskyy urgently appealed to Western allies for enhanced air defense missile production, warning that Russia intends to exploit Middle Eastern turmoil to intensify European destruction.

    Simultaneously, Kyiv awaits White House approval for a major drone production agreement proposed last year. Zelenskyy separately criticized the U.S. 30-day waiver on Russian oil sanctions, estimating it could provide Moscow with approximately $10 billion in war funding.

    In retaliatory actions, Ukrainian drones struck Russia’s southern Krasnodar region, damaging the Afipsky oil refinery and Port Kavkaz infrastructure, injuring three individuals. These developments unfold as both nations claim tactical advances along the front lines, despite Russia’s invasion entering its fifth year.