分类： world

In an early morning military incursion on Monday, Israeli forces stormed the town of Beit Ummar, located northwest of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, leaving two Palestinians dead — one a 15-year-old child — and two others injured, local and official sources confirmed. The deadly confrontation unfolded near Karmei Tzur, an unauthorized Israeli settlement built on occupied Palestinian land in violation of international law.

According to on-the-ground reports, Israeli troops opened fire on a group of young Palestinian locals near the settlement perimeter. Two of those hit were left bleeding for an extended stretch before Israeli forces seized and retained their bodies, per local accounts. The two wounded victims were evacuated to nearby hospitals, where medical staff confirmed their conditions are currently stable. The Palestinian Ministry of Health officially identified the deceased as 15-year-old Reda Sami Hassan Awad and 19-year-old Issa Arafat Ismail Awad.

Israeli military officials defended the operation, stating that troops fired on the group after members allegedly threw Molotov cocktails and started small fires near the settlement boundary. Following the shooting, the Israeli military carried out an extensive house-to-house search operation across Beit Ummar.

In response to the killings, the town declared a full general strike to protest the fatal raid. The incident is part of a sharp upward trend in Israeli military incursions and settler expansion across the occupied West Bank, particularly in the Hebron governorate. Over recent months, Israeli forces have launched repeated incursions into Hebron neighborhoods, enforcing multi-day curfews, blocking access to work and basic services, and deploying armored vehicles and bulldozers to seal off community entrances. These raids often facilitate visits by Israeli officials to the occupied city under heavy military guard; earlier this month, far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir led a heavily secured convoy march through central Hebron, a move that stoked widespread Palestinian anger.

Local residents say the escalating raids have a clear strategic goal: expanding existing Israeli settlement outposts, connecting isolated settlements to one another, and permanently entrenching Israeli settler control across more Palestinian land in the West Bank. Leading international bodies including the United Nations and Amnesty International have repeatedly warned that this pattern of activity constitutes a systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing targeting Palestinian communities, forcing entire populations out of their historic lands to make way for Israeli settlement expansion.

The latest fatalities have pushed the total death toll from Israeli attacks in the West Bank to 70 since the beginning of 2026, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health. Of those killed, 17 are children, five are women, and two are elderly. Since the launch of Israel’s large-scale military campaign in the Gaza Strip, more than 1,100 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli troops and civilian settlers across the occupied West Bank.

A 21-year-old Bedouin Israeli man held on suspicion of arms smuggling by Israel’s internal security service Shin Bet has died in hospital after being found unresponsive in his cell at a southern Israeli prison, with his family and legal representatives claiming his body bore clear signs of severe abuse. The case of Saber Amitel, a Negev-based locksmith and welder with no prior criminal record, has reignited scrutiny of treatment of detainees in Israeli custody amid a sharp rise in prisoner deaths since the start of the Israel-Gaza war last October.

According to reporting from Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Amitel was arrested earlier in June and transferred immediately to Shikma Prison in the coastal city of Ashkelon, where authorities blocked him from meeting with legal counsel for days. His family only learned of his arrest after searching for him for two full days following his disappearance during a trip to Beersheba, and reported him missing to local police, who confirmed he had been taken into custody.

Officially, Israeli police have stated Amitel attempted to die by suicide in his cell. But family and lawyers reject this account outright, noting the extensive bruising they observed when they were finally granted access to the detainee at Ashkelon’s Barzilai Hospital on June 8. This access only came after Haaretz journalists contacted Israeli authorities to inquire about the previously unreported detention.

Amitel remained hospitalized in an unresponsive, brain-dead state hooked up to life support for 12 days before his death on June 20. His body was moved to the National Centre of Forensic Medicine for official examination, but the family has declined to permit an autopsy on religious grounds, limiting officials to only an external inspection of the body.

In an interview with Haaretz, Amitel’s father Odeh described the devastating shock of seeing his healthy son reduced to an unresponsive patient on life support. “From a healthy boy who was arrested while walking on his own two feet, he ended up in this condition,” he said. “He was under guard and handcuffed. Medical staff told us that this is how he arrived. They took a healthy kid away from me only to return him dead. There’s no law in this country anymore; people are being killed under torture.” Odeh added that his son was never given the opportunity to speak with interrogators prior to being found unconscious, and had never been a violent person.

Amitel’s legal team has filed an urgent legal petition with the Beersheba District Court, calling for an independent judicial investigation into the circumstances of the young man’s death. The petition names four parties as respondents: the Israel Prison Service, Shin Bet, Israeli police, and Barzilai Medical Center. Attorneys are also requesting access to full closed-circuit camera footage from Shikma Prison, official guard duty logs, and all of Amitel’s medical records from his time in custody.

“It is inconceivable that the police and Shin Bet detained a young man, healthy in body and mind, with no criminal record, who worked long hours at a factory supporting his family, and returned him to his family as a dead body,” attorneys Esther Bar Zion and Victor Ozen told Haaretz in a statement.

In response to media inquiries, the Israel Prison Service declined to comment on any personal or medical details related to Amitel, stating only that “the circumstances are being examined by the competent authorities.” Shin Bet issued its own statement claiming that “Amitel was interrogated in accordance with the law,” and repeated the official account that a suicide attempt was discovered in his cell on June 7, after which the detainee was transferred to hospital for treatment.

The death of Amitel comes amid a growing crisis in Israeli detention facilities, following the start of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza in October 2023. Rights monitors and Palestinian sources report that at least 100 Palestinian detainees have died in Israeli custody since the war began. Many analysts and advocacy groups believe the official death toll is a significant underestimate, and that the actual number of fatalities among detainees is far higher.

For anyone experiencing mental health crisis or suicidal thoughts, free, confidential support is available globally: In the United Kingdom and Ireland, contact Samaritans at 116 123; in the United States, call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or access online support at 988lifeline.org; additional international resources can be found at befrienders.org.

Five years after seizing power in a 2021 coup that ousted Myanmar’s democratically elected government and threw the nation into a devastating civil conflict, the country’s military regime has been implicated in the deaths of more than 700 civilian lives in just six months preceding its widely discredited 2025 election, according to a new United Nations Human Rights Office investigation. The report, which tracks violence from August 2025 through January 2026, draws on cross-verified data from multiple credible on-the-ground sources to confirm a minimum of 702 civilian fatalities, including 224 women and 153 children. The period in scope began when the military junta officially announced its long-promised electoral process — a vote dismissed by the global community as a fraudulent sham, after all major opposition parties were barred from participating and entire swathes of the country controlled by armed opposition groups were excluded from balloting. Myanmar’s civil conflict has already claimed thousands of lives and displaced millions of people across the country since the 2021 coup, with large territories remaining outside the junta’s control. The UN report singles out military air strikes as the single leading cause of widespread destruction and civilian suffering across the nation. The northwestern region of Sagaing, where the military has launched sustained offensives to retake territory from opposition groups, was identified as the deadliest area for civilians, accounting for 191 confirmed civilian deaths, including 60 women and 30 children. The investigation documents two particularly brutal mass casualty attacks that targeted civilian gatherings. In October 2025, a military strike on a crowd gathered outside a school in Chaung-U, Sagaing killed 23 people, four of them children, and wounded more than 60 more. At the time of the attack, attendees were holding a peaceful candlelit vigil to mark the end of Buddhist Lent, demand the release of political prisoners, protest military forced conscription, and reject the junta’s planned election. A second deadly strike in December 2025 hit a public tea shop in Tabayin, Sagaing where civilians had gathered to watch a football match, killing at least 19 people and injuring 20 more. Beyond junta-perpetrated violence, the report also documents ongoing human rights abuses against the Rohingya minority, who are targeted with killings, arbitrary detention, sexual violence, and forced recruitment at the hands of the Arakan Army. In a stark rebuke of fading global engagement with the crisis, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk emphasized that the people of Myanmar have already endured unthinkable suffering under military rule, only to be abandoned by the international community. Cuts to international assistance have drastically exacerbated hardship for millions of people across the country, Türk noted, adding that funding for local civilian protection initiatives has long been the only lifeline for communities facing constant, indiscriminate military attacks. The withdrawal of this support, he said, only compounds the harm already inflicted on vulnerable populations. In the months following the election, the junta has solidified its grip on power: in April 2026, Min Aung Hlaing — the general who led the 2021 coup — was sworn in as the country’s president. The election’s outcome was never in doubt: leading opposition parties were banned from running, conflict-affected regions were barred from participating, the military is constitutionally guaranteed a quarter of all parliamentary seats, and the junta’s own party, the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), secured nearly 80 percent of the remaining contested seats in a process rigged heavily in its favor. Following a period of major rebel gains starting in 2023, the junta has regained the upper hand across most of the country in recent months, boosted by expanded forced conscription drives and increased access to advanced drone technology that has strengthened its offensive capabilities.

As Western rhetoric around the so-called “China Shock 2.0” gains increasing traction ahead and during the recent G7 summit, global trade experts have pushed back against the narrative, arguing it is little more than a deliberate political construct designed to shield Western protectionist trade policies, rather than an evidence-based economic analysis.

The rehashed “China Shock” framing, experts warn, carries severe risks for the global economy: it threatens to erode the post-WWII multilateral trading system, fragment cross-border supply chains, and drive up production and consumer costs worldwide. Instead of viewing China’s steady industrial and technological advancement through a hostile lens, major Western economies should embrace collaborative engagement, they say, to harness China’s unparalleled production capacity for shared global growth.

The debate reignited during the three-day G7 summit, which concluded last Wednesday. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen opened the line of criticism, first implying without naming a specific country that “some countries produce too much and do not consume enough”, framing this dynamic as an increasingly dangerous threat to global economic stability. She later explicitly targeted China, calling China’s persistent trade surplus with the European Union “unsustainable”.

Von der Leyen’s remarks align with the growing “China Shock 2.0” narrative that has circulated in Western policy circles in recent months. Last month, the London-based Centre for European Reform think tank published a report claiming a new wave of Chinese competition is sending disruptive shocks through global goods markets, and many Western outlets amplified this narrative during the G7 summit to justify new trade restrictions targeting China.

Jian Junbo, director of the Center for China-Europe Relations at Fudan University’s Institute of International Studies, explained that the entire “China Shock” framework centers on unsubstantiated claims about imbalanced trade, with a specific focus on China’s manufacturing goods surplus with Western economies.

Sun Chenghao, head of the US-Europe Program at Tsinghua University’s Center for International Security and Strategy, noted that the current wave of hype around “China Shock 2.0” is fundamentally a political project, not an economic assessment. “It layers together Western anxieties over eroding industrial competitiveness, the rising costs of the green energy transition, and broader great power strategic competition with China, before reframing all these domestic issues as a Chinese ‘security threat’ for public consumption,” Sun explained.

The original “China Shock” thesis was first coined by Western economists in the 2000s, arguing that China’s export boom after joining the World Trade Organization displaced millions of manufacturing jobs in the United States and disrupted Western labor markets. Sun pointed out that the core logic of the updated 2.0 version has not shifted: both iterations blame China for internal economic challenges that Western economies have failed to address themselves, from uneven industrial restructuring to widening income inequality to mounting competitive pressure in advanced technology sectors.

Tu Xinquan, dean of the China Institute for WTO Studies at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing, echoed this assessment. He emphasized that what Western commentators label a “China Shock” is simply the natural outcome of market competition and the dynamics of comparative advantage in global trade. “For decades, developed countries grew accustomed to holding unchallenged technological dominance,” Tu noted. “Now that they face a legitimate, competitive market rival, they are quick to abandon the free market principles they have spent decades promoting to the rest of the world.”

Contrary to the narrative that frames China’s industrial upgrading as a global threat, experts argue that China’s progress has been a net benefit to the global economy, bringing affordable high-tech goods to markets around the world, boosting aggregate productivity, and improving consumer welfare on a global scale.

James Pethokoukis, a senior fellow at the Washington-based American Enterprise Institute, laid out this positive dynamic in a December article published on the think tank’s website. Pethokoukis acknowledged that China’s rapid economic growth has reduced the United States’ relative share of global GDP, but noted that it has delivered tangible benefits to American consumers by lowering the cost of a vast range of goods and cutting input costs for American manufacturers. The U.S. economy as a whole is “absolutely richer” from trade with China, he concluded, even if its global relative share has shrunk.

Tu further explained that China’s massive, integrated production base, paired with intense domestic competition that drives efficiency, allows Chinese manufacturers to deliver high-technology goods at drastically lower prices than international competitors, a dynamic that benefits consumers and businesses worldwide. This impact is particularly visible in the global renewable energy sector, where Chinese solar panels, wind turbines, and electric vehicles have driven down costs dramatically, accelerating the global clean energy transition.

Official Chinese trade data underscores this impact: Chinese renewable energy products are exported to more than 200 countries and regions worldwide, and Chinese manufacturing innovation has cut global solar power generation costs by more than 80 percent and wind power costs by more than 60 percent over the past two decades.

Sun warned that the Western push to frame normal industrial competition as a security threat carries long-term risks for the global economy. Over time, he said, this pan-securitization of trade will push up global production costs, reduce consumer welfare, fragment interconnected supply chains, and further erode the WTO-centered multilateral trading system that has underpinned global growth for decades.

Against this backdrop, trade and international relations experts are calling for a more rational, objective approach to China’s economic development, urging Western policymakers to pursue collaborative trade frameworks that drive shared global prosperity, rather than erecting new barriers.

Jian, from Fudan University, argued that what Western commentators call a “shock” is nothing more than normal market competition, which is inherently healthy for global market growth and prosperity. Blocking legitimate competition, he said, would only hold back overall economic development. “In this context, it is crucial to view this competition rationally and objectively, embracing a market-oriented mindset and promoting self-growth through cooperation with competitors,” Jian noted.