分类: politics

  • Four convicted over spyware scandal that shook Greece

    Four convicted over spyware scandal that shook Greece

    An Athens misdemeanor court has delivered landmark convictions in Greece’s extensive wiretapping scandal, sentencing four individuals for their role in illegally surveilling prominent citizens using Predator spyware. The case, widely dubbed “Greece’s Watergate,” exposed systematic targeting of 87 high-profile figures including government ministers, military officials, and journalists.

    The convicted defendants—two Greek nationals, Felix Bitzios and Yiannis Lavranos, and two Israeli citizens, Tal Dilian and Sara Hamou—were found guilty of violating telecommunications confidentiality and illegally accessing personal data. Despite being tried in absentia, each received suspended sentences pending appeal that could theoretically reach 126 years, though Greek law limits actual service to eight years for misdemeanor convictions.

    Notably, the court rejected defense pleas for mitigation, with the presiding judge noting defendants appeared to act alongside “unknown third parties” potentially including Greek and foreign intelligence officials. This finding prompted judicial authorities to refer case documents to the Athens Prosecutor’s Office for potential espionage investigations.

    The scandal originated in summer 2022 when Nikos Androulakis, now leader of Greece’s Socialist Pasok party, was alerted by European Parliament IT specialists about a malicious text message targeting his device. Subsequent revelations showed Androulakis had been simultaneously tracked by Greece’s National Intelligence Service (EYP) for “national security reasons.”

    Predator spyware, developed by Athens-based Israeli firm Intellexa, enables comprehensive device access including messages, cameras, and microphones. Though illegal in Greece at the time of deployment, controversial 2022 legislation later legalized state surveillance software under strict conditions.

    The verdict has intensified scrutiny around Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis’s administration, which directly supervised EYP during the surveillance period. While Mitsotakis acknowledged the scandal, no government officials have faced charges, prompting accusations of institutional cover-ups.

    Financial reporter Thanasis Koukakis, among those surveilled, told BBC the ruling provided satisfaction regarding privacy violations while affirming Greece’s rule of law safeguards. Legal representatives for victims emphasized the judgment must now trigger thorough investigation into potential felony offenses by additional conspirators.

  • German court says intelligence agency can’t designate the AfD party an extremist group for now

    German court says intelligence agency can’t designate the AfD party an extremist group for now

    A German administrative court has issued a significant injunction preventing the country’s domestic intelligence service from classifying the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as a proven right-wing extremist organization while litigation continues. The Cologne-based court’s decision temporarily suspends the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV)’s controversial designation made in May 2023, which had characterized AfD as threatening Germany’s democratic foundations through its anti-migrant rhetoric and activities.

    The judicial intervention comes as response to AfD’s legal challenge against the intelligence agency’s assessment. Although the court acknowledged evidence of anti-constitutional elements within certain party factions, it determined that these elements did not sufficiently establish a comprehensive pattern of systemic extremism across the entire organization to justify the designation at this procedural stage.

    This interim ruling represents a procedural victory for AfD, Germany’s primary opposition party, which secured second place in the most recent federal election. The suspension of the extremist label means the BfV cannot implement enhanced surveillance measures against the party until the court delivers its final verdict, for which no timeline has been established.

    The case has attracted international attention, previously prompting diplomatic exchanges between German and U.S. officials regarding the appropriate boundaries of political designation and monitoring. AfD leadership has celebrated the injunction as a triumph for democratic principles, while the intelligence agency must now await judicial clearance before proceeding with its constitutional oversight responsibilities.

  • Spain to check Gibraltar arrivals under post-Brexit deal

    Spain to check Gibraltar arrivals under post-Brexit deal

    In a significant development following years of post-Brexit uncertainty, the United Kingdom and European Union have finalized a comprehensive border agreement for Gibraltar that introduces a novel dual-check system while maintaining the territory’s unique status.

    The 1,000-page draft treaty, published Thursday, establishes that Spanish border officials will conduct secondary Schengen-style checks at Gibraltar’s airport and port facilities following initial screenings by Gibraltarian authorities. This arrangement notably avoids Gibraltar’s formal accession to the Schengen zone while addressing border control requirements.

    Spanish guards operating within designated special zones will be granted specific powers to “arrest, search and interview travellers where justified during border control operations,” according to the treaty provisions. The agreement paves the way for eventual removal of ‘La Verja’ – the 1.2km border fence separating Gibraltar from Spain, which approximately half of Gibraltar’s workforce crosses daily.

    Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares celebrated the arrangement as eliminating “the last wall in continental Europe,” while UK officials compared the system to existing procedures at London’s St Pancras station where both British and French officials conduct border checks for Eurostar passengers.

    The timing proved crucial, with pressure mounting ahead of April’s scheduled implementation of the EU’s new automated border system featuring biometric checks at the Gibraltar-Spain frontier. UK authorities had warned such measures would “devastate” Gibraltar’s economy, where British nationals constitute 86.5% of all airport departures according to recent tourism data.

    Gibraltar Chief Minister Fabian Picardo welcomed the agreement as delivering “the certainty our people and businesses need,” with provisional application targeted for April 10th – coinciding with the EU’s new border system implementation date after previous delays.

    Beyond border arrangements, the treaty establishes that most goods destined for Gibraltar will undergo EU customs clearance in Spain, eliminating need for border checks. Additionally, both UK and EU have committed financial contributions to a new fund promoting “training and employment” in Spanish regions surrounding the territory.

    The agreement represents the culmination of negotiations following a political deal reached in June 2023, with the draft now undergoing final legal review and translation before requiring ratification by both UK and European Parliaments.

  • Iran ‘offers US firms investment opportunities’ as crunch talks resume

    Iran ‘offers US firms investment opportunities’ as crunch talks resume

    As high-stakes nuclear negotiations resume in Geneva, Iran is reportedly attempting to leverage President Donald Trump’s business background by presenting potential investment opportunities in its energy sector. According to Financial Times sources, Tehran believes offering substantial financial returns could appeal to Trump’s deal-making instincts and create diplomatic breakthroughs.

    The proposed economic incentives, described by insiders as ‘a major economic bonanza,’ specifically target Trump’s business sensibilities with offers in oil and gas development, mining rights, and critical minerals. This unconventional diplomatic approach emerges as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi prepares to meet with US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner for the third round of talks amid escalating tensions over Iran’s nuclear activities.

    US officials have responded cautiously, with a senior administration official stating that no formal commercial offer has been presented to Washington. ‘President Trump has been clear that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon or the capacity to build one,’ the official emphasized, maintaining the administration’s consistent position on non-proliferation.

    Sources indicate Iran is studying Venezuela’s situation as a potential model, referencing Trump’s promise to open Venezuela’s oil industry to US companies following President Nicolas Maduro’s removal. Meanwhile, Iran has reportedly presented a proposal through Omani mediators designed to test US diplomatic sincerity. Iranian state media IRNA suggested that rejecting the proposal would ‘confirm the initial suspicion that the United States is not genuinely committed to diplomacy.’

    The economic overtures coincide with new US sanctions targeting over 30 individuals and entities allegedly enabling Iran’s illicit petroleum sales and weapons programs. Iranian officials have consistently denied developing nuclear weapons, with President Masoud Pezeshkian referencing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s long-standing ban on weapons of mass destruction dating back to the early 2000s.

  • Danish PM calls snap election with Greenland issue centre-stage

    Danish PM calls snap election with Greenland issue centre-stage

    Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has dissolved parliament and called an early general election, framing the next four years as critically decisive for Denmark’s national security and international positioning. The surprise announcement comes after months of political turbulence sparked by former U.S. President Donald Trump’s repeated attempts to acquire Greenland, a semi-autonomous Danish territory.

    Addressing parliament, Frederiksen emphasized that security considerations would form the cornerstone of Danish politics for years to come. ‘We as Danes and as Europeans will really have to stand on our own feet,’ she declared, specifically noting the need to ‘define our relationship with the United States.’

    The political crisis erupted when Trump publicly floated the idea of annexing Greenland, even briefly threatening military action against the NATO ally to seize the strategically valuable Arctic territory. Although Trump later withdrew threats of force, his administration continued pursuing avenues to establish American control over the entire island.

    Greenland’s significance stems from its geographic position between North America and the Arctic, making it ideally situated for early warning systems against potential missile attacks. Trump made unsubstantiated claims that the territory is ‘covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place,’ despite minimal evidence supporting these assertions.

    The United States maintains a permanent military presence of over 100 personnel at Thule Air Base in northwestern Greenland, a facility operated since World War II. Existing bilateral agreements permit the U.S. to deploy unlimited troops to the territory, though both Denmark and Greenland have consistently rejected ceding sovereignty.

    The confrontation escalated recently when Trump proposed sending a ship filled with medical supplies to Greenland, alleging inadequate healthcare provision—a claim promptly refuted by Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen, who highlighted Greenland’s universal free healthcare system unlike the United States.

    European allies have rallied behind Denmark, while Frederiksen’s electoral gamble represents a strategic pivot toward European unity and increased self-reliance. ‘We must rearm to ensure peace on our continent,’ she told lawmakers, stressing the need to ‘stick together in Europe and secure the future of the Danish Commonwealth’—comprising Denmark, Greenland, and the Faroe Islands.

    Frederiksen’s political future hinges on the mandate voters grant her Social Democratic party, the lead partner in Denmark’s current coalition government. The election outcome will determine Denmark’s approach to transatlantic relations amid growing geopolitical competition in the Arctic region.

  • Hillary Clinton to appear before US House panel investigating Epstein

    Hillary Clinton to appear before US House panel investigating Epstein

    In a significant reversal of their previous position, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton have consented to provide testimony before the House Oversight Committee regarding their connections to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    The Clintons, who had previously denounced the investigation as politically motivated and resisted subpoenas, agreed to testify as congressional contempt proceedings loomed. Their decision to cooperate averted potential legal consequences for defying congressional demands.

    Hillary Clinton, scheduled to appear before the panel on Thursday, has maintained through representatives that she has no recollection of ever meeting or communicating with Epstein. Former President Clinton, who will testify separately on Friday, has acknowledged knowing Epstein but stated he severed ties with him approximately twenty years ago. He has expressed regret over their past association and denied any awareness of or involvement in Epstein’s criminal activities.

    This deposition marks a historic event, representing the first time a former U.S. president has testified before a congressional committee since President Gerald Ford did so in 1983. The hearings will be conducted in Chappaqua, New York, near the Clintons’ residence. While such proceedings are typically closed-door, the couple reportedly negotiated for their testimonies to be public to prevent selective leaks to the media.

    The investigation, led by Republican committee chairman James Comer, has been described by him as a bipartisan effort to demonstrate that ‘no one is above the law.’ In contrast, the Clintons have previously accused Comer of engaging in ‘partisan politics’ and characterized the subpoenas as a ploy orchestrated by former President Trump to embarrass political rivals.

    The release of documents by the U.S. Department of Justice has revealed the extensive network of high-profile individuals connected to Epstein, including Bill Clinton. It is crucial to note that mere appearance in these documents does not imply any wrongdoing. Both Democratic and Republican committee members are expected to brief the press following Hillary Clinton’s deposition.

  • US justice department accused of withholding Trump-related Epstein files

    US justice department accused of withholding Trump-related Epstein files

    A significant political confrontation has erupted between Congressional Democrats and the Justice Department regarding the handling of sensitive documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal network. Representative Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, has publicly accused federal authorities of deliberately concealing files containing sexual abuse allegations against former President Donald Trump.

    According to Garcia, who has personally reviewed unreleased documentation, these files contain specific allegations made by a woman who claims she was sexually abused by Trump between 1983 and 1985, when she would have been between 13 and 15 years old. The Congressman asserts these allegations are not reflected in the publicly released Epstein documents.

    The Justice Department, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, has vehemently denied these accusations, stating that ‘NOTHING has been deleted’ and that documents were only withheld if they were ‘duplicates, privileged, or part of an ongoing federal investigation.’ The department maintains that some files contain ‘untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump’ that lack credibility.

    This controversy follows reports from NPR and The New York Times indicating that three FBI witness interviews totaling over 50 pages appear to be missing from the publicly available Epstein documentation. These interviews were conducted in 2019 as part of the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s accomplice who was convicted of sex trafficking in 2022.

    The White House has responded through spokeswoman Abigail Jackson, who emphasized that President Trump has ‘done more for Epstein’s victims than anyone before him’ by releasing thousands of pages of documents, cooperating with Congressional subpoenas, and signing the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

    Historical context reveals that Trump and Epstein maintained a social relationship from the late 1980s through the following decade, with Trump describing Epstein in a 2002 interview as a ‘terrific guy’ who ‘likes beautiful women… many of them on the younger side.’ The two reportedly fell out in the early 2000s, prior to Epstein’s first arrest.

    The released documents include emails from Epstein to Maxwell in 2011 suggesting Trump’s presence with an alleged victim, though the White House has identified this individual as the late Virginia Giuffre, who previously stated Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing.

    Garcia has formally demanded full disclosure of all withheld materials, accusing the Trump administration of orchestrating ‘the largest government cover-up in modern history.’ The Justice Department has committed to reviewing whether any files were improperly withheld while simultaneously accusing Democrats of ‘manufacturing outrage from their radical anti-Trump base.’

  • Danish prime minister calls a parliamentary election on March 24

    Danish prime minister calls a parliamentary election on March 24

    COPENHAGEN, Denmark — In a significant political development, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen declared on Thursday that the Scandinavian nation will conduct parliamentary elections on March 24. This electoral process will determine the composition of the Folketing, Denmark’s parliamentary body, for the subsequent four-year legislative term.

    The Danish parliamentary system comprises 179 seats, with 175 allocated to representatives from mainland Denmark and two seats each reserved for lawmakers from the kingdom’s semi-autonomous territories of Greenland and the Faroe Islands. While Danish law mandates general elections at minimum four-year intervals, the Prime Minister retains constitutional authority to call early elections at their discretion.

    The upcoming vote follows the previous general election held on November 1, 2022, which produced an unusual cross-spectrum governing coalition. Frederiksen, a center-left Social Democrat who has held the premiership since June 2019, currently leads a tripartite government comprising her Social Democratic party, the right-leaning Liberal Party led by Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen, and the centrist Moderate party headed by Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, a former prime minister.

    This political arrangement represents a rare coalition bridging traditional left-right ideological divisions in Danish politics. The March election will test the durability of this unconventional governing alliance and determine Denmark’s political direction for the coming term.

  • Human rights situation in Colombia is backsliding, UN warns as nation heads into elections

    Human rights situation in Colombia is backsliding, UN warns as nation heads into elections

    The United Nations has issued a stark warning that Colombia faces a dangerous regression to pre-peace accord human rights conditions, potentially undermining both national security and upcoming electoral processes. In its annual assessment released Thursday, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights documented alarming escalations across multiple conflict indicators throughout 2025.

    Rural communities have become battlegrounds for armed factions and drug trafficking organizations vying for territories vacated by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) following their historic 2016 disarmament. The statistical evidence reveals a disturbing trend: forced displacements surged by 85% to approximately 94,000 citizens, while murders targeting human rights defenders increased by 9%. Simultaneously, illegal armed groups imposed 12% more lockdowns—coercive measures that restrict civilian movement, prohibit farming activities, and force closures of educational institutions and businesses.

    Scott Campbell, the UN’s Colombia representative, characterized the report as “an early warning” highlighting numerous indicators demanding immediate attention to prevent further deterioration. While current violence levels haven’t reached the peak conflict era’s annual displacement of 300,000 people, the assessment emphasizes that governmental protections remain insufficient.

    A particularly insidious development involves rebel groups leveraging social media platforms to forcibly recruit minors. Although the UN verified 150 such cases in 2025, officials acknowledge significant underreporting due to families’ legitimate fears of retaliation.

    The administration of President Gustavo Petro—a former guerrilla member who pioneered “total peace” negotiations with remaining insurgent groups—has struggled to translate ceasefires into enhanced civilian protection. The report notes these diplomatic efforts have frequently failed to reduce attacks against non-combatants.

    Electoral security emerges as a critical concern, with documented attacks against 126 political leaders and 18 assassinations in the past year. The assassination of conservative presidential candidate Miguel Uribe in Bogotá—the first such incident in three decades—exemplifies the deteriorating security environment for democratic participation.

    With congressional elections scheduled for March 8 and presidential voting in May, the UN urges both current and future administrations to fully implement the 2016 peace agreement’s outstanding provisions. These include establishing agrarian conflict resolution mechanisms and developing sustainable alternative livelihoods to coca cultivation. Campbell emphasized that the existing peace accord provides a definitive “road map” toward achieving lasting stability and human rights protection.

  • China Coast Guard drives away Philippine vessels illegally intruding into Huangyan Island waters

    China Coast Guard drives away Philippine vessels illegally intruding into Huangyan Island waters

    In a recent maritime incident near Huangyan Island, Chinese Coast Guard vessels implemented lawful enforcement measures against Philippine ships that had entered contested waters. The encounter occurred on February 21, 2026, when multiple Philippine vessels gathered and crossed into what China claims as its territorial waters in the South China Sea.

    According to official reports, the Philippine ships engaged in photographing Chinese vessels and executing dangerous navigation maneuvers that involved crossing the paths of patrolling CCG ships. The Philippine Coast Guard vessel 4409 was additionally observed maintaining presence at a distance from the main engagement.

    The China Coast Guard responded with repeated verbal warnings before escalating to regulatory actions. These measures included targeted water cannon sprays and tactical navigation control operations that ultimately compelled the Philippine vessels to depart the area.

    Chinese authorities emphasized that their response demonstrated appropriate restraint and full compliance with international legal standards. The CCG’s on-duty fleet characterized the Philippine actions as a staged performance under the guise of escort and rights protection missions, noting that these activities occurred despite challenging weather conditions and increased maritime accident risks in the region.

    China reaffirmed its commitment to fulfilling maritime rescue responsibilities while maintaining an uncompromising position regarding territorial sovereignty. The incident highlights ongoing tensions in the strategically significant South China Sea waterways where multiple nations maintain competing territorial claims.