分类: politics

  • White House to review Trump’s security after shooting at dinner event

    White House to review Trump’s security after shooting at dinner event

    A security breach at the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner Saturday has triggered a full review of presidential protection protocols, after an armed suspect managed to approach a crowded ballroom housing former President Donald Trump, top U.S. officials and more than 2,000 attendees. A senior White House official confirmed to the BBC that senior leadership will convene a high-level meeting this week to examine the incident and refine security practices ahead of a packed schedule of high-stakes public events for the president this year.

    The suspect, 31-year-old Cole Tomas Allen, breached security perimeters and engaged in a brief shootout with law enforcement before being subdued by officers. A federal agent wearing a ballistic vest was shot during the exchange, but no fatalities or critical injuries to attendees were reported. The incident has sparked intense scrutiny of the U.S. Secret Service, the federal agency tasked with protecting the sitting president and other high-ranking government officials, after multiple security gaps were reported: attendees entering the Washington Hilton venue were not required to show valid photo identification, event tickets only listed table numbers without attendee names, and a single metal detector checkpoint was placed one level above the main ballroom entrances. Allen was stopped just near the top of the stairs leading directly to the ballroom doors.

    Despite widespread questions about the agency’s performance, President Trump has repeatedly voiced full confidence in the Secret Service’s actions. A senior White House official told the BBC that the president personally believes agents did an excellent job of neutralizing the threat and moving him and his inner circle to safety quickly. Even with that public backing, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles will lead the upcoming review meeting, which will include senior operations staff, Secret Service representatives, and officials from the Department of Homeland Security. The gathering will focus on dissecting which existing protocols successfully stopped the attack, while evaluating additional improvements to strengthen security for the large number of high-profile presidential events scheduled for the coming months.

    Among the upcoming major events are public gatherings tied to the 250th anniversary of the United States this July, a planned UFC fight hosted on the White House South Lawn, and official appearances tied to the 2026 World Cup. Separately, Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley, who was in attendance at the dinner alongside Trump, Vice President JD Vance and House Speaker Mike Johnson, has announced plans to hold a separate closed-door briefing with Secret Service leadership to examine the incident and existing security protocols. Grassley, 92, is fourth in the presidential line of succession.

    In an on-site briefing roughly two hours after the shooting was contained, Trump acknowledged the inherent risks of open public events for sitting presidents. “I can’t imagine that there’s any profession that is more dangerous,” he said of the work of Secret Service agents, reiterating his support for the agency despite the coming review.

  • ‘Looming’ risk of nuclear arms race, UN proliferation meeting hears

    ‘Looming’ risk of nuclear arms race, UN proliferation meeting hears

    A high-stakes four-week conference of signatories to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the global cornerstone of atomic non-proliferation efforts, kicked off Monday at United Nations Headquarters in New York. Delegates gathered against a backdrop of escalating geopolitical tensions and growing alarm among world leaders and experts that a new global nuclear arms race is increasingly likely.

    In his opening address to the gathering, UN Secretary-General António Guterres delivered a stark warning that the long-fraying foundations of the NPT are at a breaking point. “For too long, the treaty has been eroding. Commitments remain unfulfilled. Trust and credibility are wearing thin. The drivers of proliferation are accelerating. We need to breathe life into the treaty once more,” he said, echoing the dire warning he issued at the 2022 NPT review conference, when he stated humanity stood “one misunderstanding, one miscalculation away from nuclear annihilation.”

    Data released earlier this year by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) underscores these growing risks. As of January 2025, the world’s nine nuclear-armed states — Russia, the United States, France, the United Kingdom, China, India, Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea — hold a combined total of 12,241 nuclear warheads. The United States and Russia alone control nearly 90 percent of the global stockpile, and both nations have poured extensive resources into modernizing their arsenals in recent years. SIPRI also confirmed China has rapidly expanded its nuclear stockpile, a development that prompted the G7 to issue a formal warning over Moscow and Beijing’s growing nuclear capabilities just days before the conference opened.

    Recent policy shifts have further fueled global anxiety: US President Donald Trump has publicly stated he intends to resume nuclear testing, claiming other nations are already conducting covert tests, while French President Emmanuel Macron announced a major shift to France’s nuclear deterrence strategy in March, including a planned expansion of the country’s current arsenal of 290 warheads.

    French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot told conference delegates that the current moment carries unprecedented risk. “Never has the risk of nuclear proliferation been so high, and the threat posed by Iran’s and North Korea’s programs is intolerable for each and every state party to this treaty,” he said. Pyongyang’s advancing nuclear development program is widely identified as one of the most intractable sticking points that could derail any consensus agreement at the conference, alongside the ongoing war in Ukraine and disputes over Iran’s atomic activities.

    Conference president Do Hung Viet, Vietnam’s permanent representative to the UN, moved quickly to temper unrealistic expectations for the gathering. “We should not expect this conference to resolve the underlying strategic tensions of our time,” he said. Even so, he argued that incremental progress would carry global significance: “But a balanced outcome that reaffirms core commitments and set out practical steps forward would strengthen the integrity of the NPT. The success or failure of this conference will have implications way beyond these halls. The prospects of a new nuclear arms race are looming over us.”

    Adding to the tensions already at the conference, the United States, joined by allies Britain, the United Arab Emirates, and Australia, publicly condemned the appointment of Iran as a vice president of the meeting. Washington’s envoy to the conference called granting Tehran a leadership role an “affront” to all nations that uphold the NPT’s obligations.

    Beyond long-standing geopolitical disputes, a new issue is set to take a prominent place on the agenda: the role of artificial intelligence in nuclear command and control. A number of countries have pushed for binding commitments that ensure human leaders retain full control over all nuclear weapons decisions, amid growing fears that AI could raise the risk of accidental or unauthorized launch.

    Like past NPT review conferences, any final agreement requires consensus from all participating states, a high bar that has derailed the past two gatherings. In 2015, talks collapsed after the United States, a close ally of Israel, opposed plans to create a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Middle East. The 2022 conference hit an impasse after Russia objected to language referencing the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine.

    Seth Shelden, a representative of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), the Nobel Peace Prize-winning anti-nuclear organization, told Agence France-Presse that the erosion of trust is now visible across the global non-proliferation regime. “It is obvious that trust is eroding, both inside and outside the NPT,” he said, casting doubt on whether the four-week summit can deliver any meaningful, binding progress.

    The NPT, signed by nearly every country on Earth with only a handful of notable holdouts including Israel, India, and Pakistan, has three core missions: halt the spread of nuclear weapons, work toward complete global nuclear disarmament, and facilitate peaceful cooperation on civilian nuclear energy projects.

  • Melania Trump urges ABC to ‘take stand’ on Jimmy Kimmel after widow joke

    Melania Trump urges ABC to ‘take stand’ on Jimmy Kimmel after widow joke

    A fresh controversy has erupted around late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel, after former first lady Melania Trump publicly lambasted a hateful joke he made ahead of the 2026 White House Correspondents’ Dinner – where a would-be attacker later opened fire in an incident authorities suspect targeted senior Trump administration figures.

    The incendiary quip, delivered during Kimmel’s pre-dinner monologue on ABC on Thursday, targeted the former first lady directly. “Our First Lady, Melania, is here. Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow,” Kimmel joked. Just two days after the segment aired, 31-year-old suspect Cole Tomas Allen was tackled by Secret Service agents near a staircase leading to the dinner ballroom, which was packed with hundreds of journalists, government officials and high-profile public figures. No attendees were harmed in the incident, and Allen is scheduled to make his first court appearance on Monday.

    In the wake of the shooting, a clip of Kimmel’s joke resurfaced online and ignited widespread backlash across social media platforms, with many critics arguing that the comedian’s harsh rhetoric crossed a line and emboldened political violence. On Monday, Melania Trump broke her silence on the incident with a scathing public post on X, denouncing Kimmel’s comment as dangerous and unfunny.

    The former first lady called Kimmel’s remark “hateful and violent”, describing the joke about herself and her family as corrosive commentary that amplifies the deep political polarization dividing the United States. “His monologue about my family isn’t comedy – his words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America,” she wrote. Melania Trump went on to call on network executives at ABC, Kimmel’s long-time broadcaster, to take disciplinary action against the host for what she labeled his “atrocious behavior”. She questioned why network leadership has repeatedly enabled Kimmel’s inflammatory rhetoric, writing: “How many times will ABC’s leadership enable Kimmel’s atrocious behavior at the expense of our community.” She added that commentators like Kimmel should not be given a national platform to “spread hate” into American households each night.

    This is not the first time Kimmel’s controversial political commentary has gotten him pulled from air. Last September, the host was temporarily suspended after drawing outrage for remarks he made following the fatal shooting of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. During that monologue, Kimmel claimed that Trump’s Make America Great Again movement – commonly nicknamed “Maga” – was attempting to exploit Kirk’s murder for political gain. After a week off the air, Kimmel returned to the show and acknowledged that his comments had been poorly received. “I accept that some people felt my remarks about Kirk’s death had been ‘ill-timed or unclear or maybe both’,” he said at the time, adding “I get why you’re upset.”

    As of Monday, the BBC has reached out to ABC News for a response to Melania Trump’s latest demands, and the network has not yet issued a public comment on the controversy.

  • Former National Railway Administration head indicted with bribery

    Former National Railway Administration head indicted with bribery

    In an official announcement made Monday, China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) confirmed that Fei Dongbin, the former director of the National Railway Administration, has been formally indicted on suspicion of bribery following a year-long investigation by national supervisory authorities.

    The case follows a standard legal process for major corruption probes in China: after the National Commission of Supervision completed its fact-finding and investigation, the matter was transferred to procuratorial organs for prosecution review. The SPP first approved a formal arrest warrant for Fei, then designated the Changchun People’s Procuratorate based in northeast China’s Jilin Province to handle the prosecution of the case. The prosecuting office recently submitted its formal indictment to the Changchun Intermediate People’s Court, opening the next phase of judicial proceedings.

    Per official case documents, Fei is accused of abusing a series of senior positions he held over decades of work in both the national railway system and local government to extract illegal gains. His career included senior leadership roles as executive deputy director of the former Beijing Railway Bureau and former Jinan Railway Bureau, director of the former Hohhot Railway Bureau, mayor of Ulaanqab in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, vice-governor of central China’s Henan Province, and finally head of the National Railway Administration starting in September 2022. Prosecutors allege that Fei used his official influence to coordinate with other state functionaries to secure improper business and personal benefits for specific organizations and individuals, and in exchange, illegally accepted an exceptionally large sum of money and high-value assets.

    Throughout the prosecution review process, legal procedural requirements were strictly followed: prosecuting officials informed Fei of all his litigation rights as a defendant, conducted formal interrogations, and accepted and reviewed arguments presented by Fei’s defense legal team. Prosecutors have formally stated that Fei must bear criminal liability for the suspected bribery offense.

    A 55-year-old native of Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, Fei began his professional career in 1991, joining the Communist Party of China five years later in 1996. His entire career was rooted in public service, starting with an entry-level role at the former Shenyang Railway Bureau in his home province, where he rose through the ranks to hold senior roles including deputy director and chief engineer. Following 2017, Fei transitioned into senior local government roles, first serving as deputy Party chief and mayor of Ulaanqab, then vice-governor of Henan Province, before his appointment to lead the National Railway Administration in 2022.

    Fei’s tenure at the top of the national railway regulator ended abruptly when he was placed under official investigation for corruption in 2025. By December that same year, he was expelled from the Communist Party of China and removed from all public office, ahead of the formal indictment announced this week. The case is part of China’s ongoing national anti-corruption campaign that targets misconduct by senior officials across all critical public sectors, including transportation infrastructure.

  • Chinese and Kyrgyz defense ministers discuss bilateral military cooperation

    Chinese and Kyrgyz defense ministers discuss bilateral military cooperation

    On Monday, during an official invited visit to Kyrgyzstan, China’s Minister of National Defense Dong Jun met face-to-face with his Kyrgyz counterpart, Mukambetov Ruslan Mustafaevich, for high-level bilateral defense discussions.

    Prior to the formal negotiations, Minister Mukambetov extended a formal welcome to Dong by hosting a traditional honor guard ceremony, where the two leaders jointly inspected the guard of honor to mark the significance of the diplomatic meeting.

    According to an official statement released by China’s Ministry of National Defense immediately following the talks, the two defense chiefs held a thorough, in-depth exchange of views across a wide range of critical topics. These included the current state of bilateral state-to-state and military-to-military relations, evolving dynamics in the international and regional security landscape, and other shared concerns that impact both nations.

    Both sides reached a clear mutual agreement: they will continue to follow through on the consensus that has already been established by the two countries’ heads of state, and work to expand and deepen practical, on-the-ground military cooperation in the coming period. This meeting marks another step forward in strengthening the constructive defense partnership between China and Kyrgyzstan, aligning with long-term efforts to boost regional stability and cross-border mutual trust.

  • What to expect as Trump hosts the King

    What to expect as Trump hosts the King

    A high-stakes diplomatic meeting is set to unfold on United States soil, as former President Donald Trump welcomes King Charles III for a formal visit that unfolds against a backdrop of growing friction between Washington and London. The long-awaited royal trip arrives at a moment of deep division between the two long-standing allies, with the simmering crisis over Iran emerging as the core flashpoint that threatens to complicate discussions between the two leaders. For decades, the United States and the United Kingdom have maintained a so-called special relationship, built on shared security goals, economic ties and cultural alignment. But in recent weeks, disagreements over how to address escalating tensions around Iran have opened a rare and noticeable rift between the two governments, casting a shadow over this symbolic royal engagement. Analysts note that while the visit carries heavy ceremonial weight, behind the formal handshakes and state dinners, both sides will be navigating significant differences on Iran policy. Whether the meeting will ease the current strain or further highlight the divide between the two allies remains to be seen as the visit gets underway.

  • Israel sent air defence system and troops to UAE during Iran war, report says

    Israel sent air defence system and troops to UAE during Iran war, report says

    In a landmark development that underscores deepening security ties between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Israel deployed its Iron Dome air defence system – complete with operating troops – to the Gulf nation during the ongoing conflict with Iran, multiple senior officials confirmed to Axios in a report published Sunday.

    The deployment, the first time Israel has ever sent an operational Iron Dome battery to another country, was ordered shortly after the conflict began by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, following a direct phone call between Netanyahu and Emirati President Mohammed bin Zayed, the US-based news outlet reported. The shipment included a full working battery, interceptor missiles, and several dozen specially trained Israeli soldiers to operate the system.

    One senior Israeli official noted that this deployment makes the UAE only the third country in the world – after the United States and Israel itself – to host and use the Iron Dome air defence system in active conflict. During the 40-day war, which began on February 28 when a joint US-Israeli aerial offensive targeted Iranian leadership, hundreds of Iranian ballistic missiles and drones were launched at US military installations located within UAE territory and other Emirati targets. Israeli officials confirm the Iron Dome system successfully intercepted dozens of these incoming Iranian projectiles.

    This historic security deployment is just one piece of a far broader pattern of intensive bilateral cooperation between Tel Aviv and Abu Dhabi that has emerged since the start of the conflict, officials from both nations told Axios. The two countries have coordinated closely across both military and political spheres since hostilities began, when the joint US-Israeli strike killed Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei alongside multiple other senior Iranian government and military officials.

    Beyond the Iron Dome deployment, the Israeli Air Force conducted pre-emptive strikes against short-range Iranian missile positions in southern Iran, destroying the projectiles before they could be launched toward the UAE and other neighbouring Gulf states.

    Escalation of the conflict followed a joint US-Israeli bombing raid on Iran’s strategic South Pars gas field, a critical cornerstone of Iran’s national energy infrastructure, on March 18. In response, Tehran launched a widespread counteroffensive targeting energy infrastructure across the entire Gulf region, expanding attacks to hit hotels, airports, data centres, commercial ports, and US diplomatic missions across the Middle East.

    The UAE emerged as one of Iran’s most heavily targeted adversaries in the conflict. Emirati authorities confirm Iran launched approximately 550 ballistic and cruise missiles, plus more than 2,200 attack drones, at targets across the country. While the vast majority of incoming projectiles were intercepted by allied air defence systems, falling debris still caused substantial damage across key urban and economic centres in Abu Dhabi and Dubai, including at iconic landmarks such as Burj Al Arab and Palm Jumeirah, Dubai International Airport, and the Fujairah oil industrial zone.

    The sustained conflict has also taken a major economic toll on the UAE: Dubai’s global reputation as a leading luxury tourism destination has suffered significant damage, and the country’s oil exports have slowed to a fraction of pre-war levels.

    On April 8, the United States and Iran agreed to implement a temporary ceasefire that halted large-scale active hostilities and opened the door for bilateral negotiations. As of the latest reporting, these talks have not yet produced any major breakthrough toward a lasting peace agreement.

  • Suspect due in court over shooting at Trump gala

    Suspect due in court over shooting at Trump gala

    In the latest episode of escalating political violence rocking a deeply polarized United States, a 31-year-old California man accused of attempting to assassinate former President Donald Trump at a high-profile Washington DC gala is scheduled to make his first federal court appearance on Monday, marking the third alleged plot on the former president’s life in just two years.

    The alleged attack unfolded Saturday night at the Washington Hilton, the iconic venue that has hosted the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner for decades without security incident. Saturday’s gathering marked the first time Trump, who was in attendance alongside First Lady Melania Trump, Vice President JD Vance, multiple cabinet members, top congressional leaders, and hundreds of political and media guests, had accepted the WHCA’s invitation to attend the annual black-tie event.

    According to administration officials, the suspect, identified as Cole Allen, came to the venue with the explicit goal of killing Trump and other senior officials attending the media dinner. Allen was a registered guest at the hotel, and arrived armed with a shotgun, a handgun, and multiple knives. The New York Post reported that, shortly before launching his alleged attack, Allen sent a message to his family noting that his planned targets would be “prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest.”

    Camera footage shared by Trump online shows the suspect sprinting past a security checkpoint on the floor directly above the gala ballroom. After a short exchange of gunfire between Allen and Secret Service agents, the suspect was taken into custody at the scene. No fatalities were reported in the incident. The moment gunfire erupted, Secret Service agents immediately swarmed the ballroom to protect the former president, triggering chaotic scenes as dozens of attendees dove under tables for cover.

    Trump was quickly evacuated from the venue by his Secret Service detail. Speaking to reporters at a hastily convened late-night press briefing at the White House, Trump recalled that he initially mistook the sound of gunfire for a dropped serving tray before recognizing the danger. He told CBS News in an interview Sunday evening that he did not fear for casualties amid the chaos, saying, “I wasn’t worried. I understand life. We live in a crazy world.”

    Allen is expected to face initial charges of assault on a federal officer and use of a firearm during a violent felony during his 1 pm ET (1700 GMT) court appearance Monday. Legal officials note that additional charges are likely to be filed in the coming days as the investigation progresses. The incident has renewed public scrutiny of presidential security protocols, after Trump noted that the Washington Hilton venue was “not a particularly secure” facility. The former president also said he hopes the dinner can be rescheduled within the next month.

    Saturday’s alleged plot is the third known attempt on Trump’s life since 2024. During a 2024 campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, a gunman opened fire on the crowd, killing one attendee and wounding Trump lightly in the ear. Just months later, a second man was arrested after a Secret Service agent spotted a rifle barrel protruding from bushes along the perimeter of a West Palm Beach golf course where Trump was playing a round of golf.

  • Argentina’s leader bars journalists from government HQ, raising concerns about press freedom

    Argentina’s leader bars journalists from government HQ, raising concerns about press freedom

    BUENOS AIRES, Argentina — In a move that has sent shockwaves through Argentina’s democratic landscape, President Javier Milei has barred the entire corps of accredited reporters from entering the Casa Rosada, the country’s iconic presidential headquarters, capping off a months-long pattern of aggressive hostility toward independent journalism that mirrors the anti-media rhetoric of his ideological ally, former U.S. President Donald Trump.

    The unprecedented ban, implemented last week, followed a dispute over unauthorized footage filmed inside the presidential complex by reporters from Argentina’s Todo Noticias network. According to presidential spokesperson Javier Lanari, the move was implemented as a “preventative measure” after the outlet aired footage captured with hidden smart glasses, which the government frames as illegal espionage. But the network’s journalists push back against this characterization, noting they notified administration press officials of their filming plans in advance, and the footage only captured publicly accessible areas of the building that have been featured on national television before.

    Rather than limiting criticism of his administration, the ban has sparked unified condemnation from across Argentina’s political spectrum, press freedom organizations, and watchdog groups. For a nation that has celebrated a vibrant, independent press since the end of its military dictatorship in 1983, observers say the full exclusion of the press from the presidential seat marks the most severe attack on press freedom in four decades.

    “It’s the culmination of the government’s contempt for journalism and its value in a democracy,” explained Fernando Stanich, president of the Argentine Journalism Forum, a leading professional press association.

    Cristina Zahar, Latin America coordinator for the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, framed the administration’s actions as a clear sign of authoritarian drift, even as Argentina remains formally democratic. “An autocrat who tries to curtail press freedoms, who tries to prevent journalists from reporting and keeping society informed about public interest matters,” Zahar said.

    Milei, a radical libertarian outsider who rose to the presidency in 2023 on a platform of slashing government spending and upending Argentina’s established political order, has never moderated his provocative, anti-establishment rhetoric since taking office. An avid daily user of the social platform X, the president has leaned increasingly heavily into anti-media attacks in recent months. An analysis of Milei’s X feed conducted by leading Argentine daily *La Nación* between April 2 and 5 found that Milei published 86 original posts taunting and insulting journalists over just four days, and reshared an additional 874 similar attacks. Many of these posts repeated his signature slogan, “We don’t hate journalists enough,” repeated his false claim that 95% of Argentine journalists are active criminals, and included crude sexual innuendo or targeted insults directed at individual reporters critical of his administration.

    Hours after the press ban was implemented, Milei published an angry all-caps post attacking reporters as “disgusting scum,” adding “how about you try stopping the lies? Oh I forgot, you lot are corrupt junkies hooked on advertising bucks and bribes.” He also shared an AI-generated deepfake image that depicted a prominent Argentine television reporter wearing an orange prison jumpsuit, a clear threat of political prosecution against critical journalists.

    Long before the full ban on press access, Milei had restructured how his administration communicates with the public, sidelining traditional journalistic institutions in favor of unmediated social media outreach, a strategy also honed by Trump. Milei has never held a formal presidential press conference in his tenure, rarely grants interviews to established national outlets, and instead pushes his messaging through viral slogans and AI-generated memes. He frequently appears on right-wing influencer radio programs, and has hired prominent social media provocateurs for senior administration roles, a move that has emboldened his base to adopt stigmatizing, hostile language toward working journalists.

    Following Trump’s playbook of using legal action to harass critical outlets, Milei has filed defamation lawsuits against at least eight independent journalists over the past 12 months, and encouraged his political allies to do the same. Alejandro Alfie, a media reporter for Argentina’s largest newspaper *Clarin* who has investigated networks of anonymous pro-Milei troll accounts, currently faces four defamation lawsuits from Milei’s close allies that seek millions of pesos in damages. Alfie says he has faced ongoing threats of violence, doxxing, and harassment from Milei’s supporters, demonstrating that the president’s rhetoric carries tangible, dangerous real-world consequences.

    “People say, ‘Oh, it’s not real. It’s just social media.’ But when you have someone telling you on Instagram every day that they will kill your children, it is something else entirely,” Alfie said.

    Milei has also taken systemic steps to weaken press access beyond personal attacks and lawsuits. In 2024, he shut down Telam, Argentina’s long-running state news agency, which he accused of operating as a propaganda outlet for left-wing opposition parties — a move echoing Trump’s push to cut federal funding for U.S. public media outlets PBS and NPR over claims of biased coverage. Telam has since been restructured into a state-run advertising agency. Milei also signed changes to Argentina’s open records law that drastically reduced the volume of government information available to the public and reporters.

    Many correspondents who were barred from the Casa Rosada last week say the full ban did not come as a surprise. Over the past year, the administration has incrementally restricted press movement inside the building, closing off entire wings to reporters and capping attendance at official press briefings. Earlier this month, six accredited outlets were already barred from both the Casa Rosada and Argentina’s lower congressional chamber over unsubstantiated claims that their reporters were involved in Kremlin-backed disinformation, claims the outlets have emphatically denied.

    The Todo Noticias smart glasses incident, observers say, was merely a convenient pretext to extend existing restrictions to the entire press corps. “It was the perfect excuse to extend the punishment to the entire press corps,” said Jaime Rosemberg, a political correspondent for *La Nación* who was among the 60 blocked reporters.

    The backlash to the ban has been swift: an opposition lawmaker has already filed a lawsuit against the administration over the order, and a cross-party group of a dozen legislators has called for an urgent meeting with senior government officials to address what they call an “institutional undermining of freedom of expression.”

    The anti-press campaign comes as Milei faces growing political and economic headwinds: recent polling from AtlasIntel shows the president’s public approval rating has fallen to the lowest point of his presidency. His signature campaign promise to eliminate Argentina’s decades-long chronic inflation has stalled, unemployment has risen, and the national economy has contracted. Adding to his troubles, close ally and chief of staff Manuel Adorni is currently under investigation for misuse of public funds, a corruption scandal that echoes the elite misconduct Milei campaigned against.

    Many political analysts and journalists draw a direct line between the administration’s mounting challenges and its escalating attacks on the media, which have long served as a convenient scapegoat for unpopular outcomes. “It’s a very bad moment for the president,” Rosemberg said. “And often the easiest thing to do in that moment, what you have closest at hand, is to blame the press for everything.”

  • Congo creates a paramilitary mining guard backed by US and UAE funding

    Congo creates a paramilitary mining guard backed by US and UAE funding

    KINSHASA, DRC – The Democratic Republic of Congo officially announced the establishment of a specialized paramilitary mining guard on Monday, a $100 million security initiative backed by the United States and the United Arab Emirates. The move comes as Washington works to shore up alternative access to critical battery and tech minerals, amid a fragile peace process in Congo’s conflict-plagued eastern region.

    Per an official statement released by the country’s General Inspectorate of Mines, the new security unit will be rolled out in phased deployments. An initial contingent of 2,500 to 3,000 personnel is scheduled to complete six months of joint military training and enter active service by December this year. By the end of 2028, the force is planned to expand to more than 20,000 members, with a presence across all 22 of Congo’s mining-producing provinces.

    Core goals of the new force include strengthening state regulatory oversight of the $1 trillion-plus mining sector, cutting down on rampant illegal mineral smuggling, and rebuilding confidence among international investors looking to access Congo’s vast untapped mineral reserves. The $100 million price tag for the program is covered through partnership agreements with the U.S. and UAE, according to the statement.

    As a top global supplier of coltan, the ore that holds tantalum – a critical component used in everything from consumer smartphones and laptops to commercial aircraft engines – Congo holds enormous strategic importance for global tech and clean energy supply chains. For decades, however, the country has grappled with systemic illicit mineral trafficking and persistent insecurity, particularly in its eastern provinces. There, ongoing clashes between Congolese government forces and Rwanda-backed rebel groups have killed thousands of people and displaced hundreds of thousands more, leaving large swathes of key mining territory outside of state control.

    Rafael Kabengele, Inspector General of Mines, noted in the statement that Congolese President Félix Tshisekedi has made overhauling the mining sector a core policy priority, aiming to “clean up the entire mining sector, by eliminating practices that run counter to good governance, transparency and the traceability of minerals.”

    The new paramilitary guard will take over all mining security responsibilities currently handled by regular conventional military units. Its formal mandate covers protecting active mine sites, escorting mineral cargo from extraction sites to processing facilities and national border crossings, and safeguarding foreign direct investment in the sector.

    The initiative is a key part of Washington’s broader strategy to reduce China’s current dominance over global critical mineral supply chains, as demand for these resources surges amid the global transition to renewable energy and electric vehicle production. Last year, Congo and the U.S. signed a bilateral minerals partnership, which has already led to American firm Virtus Minerals acquiring a controlling stake in major copper-cobalt producer Chemaf. Multiple other Western companies have also expressed interest in developing new mining projects in the country, including for assets located in currently rebel-held territory.

    U.S. Geological Survey data shows that Congo produced roughly 40% of the world’s total coltan output in 2023. More than 15% of the global supply of tantalum originates from the Rubaya mining region in eastern Congo, which remains largely under the control of armed rebel groups.

    Eastern Congo has cycled between open conflict and fragile ceasefires for nearly three decades, with more than 120 active armed groups operating across the region. Last year, the Congolese and Rwandan governments signed a U.S.-brokered peace agreement, which was paired with the bilateral critical minerals deal that opened new access for U.S. firms and government stakeholders. While peace negotiations between the Congolese government and M23, the main Rwanda-backed rebel group, remain ongoing, active clashes have continued across multiple frontlines in the east, keeping the region in a state of persistent instability.