分类: politics

  • What to know about Code Noir, a shocking French law that oversaw the slavery of 1.4 million Africans

    What to know about Code Noir, a shocking French law that oversaw the slavery of 1.4 million Africans

    On Thursday, France’s influential lower legislative chamber, the National Assembly, took a landmark step toward reckoning with the nation’s slave-trading colonial history, voting 254-0 to formally repeal the 17th-century slavery edict known as Code Noir, or the Black Code. The bill will next advance to the French Senate for consideration, where backers of the repeal anticipate it will pass, though no official timeline for the upper chamber vote has been announced.

    First signed into law by King Louis XIV at the Palace of Versailles in 1685, Code Noir laid out the official legal framework regulating chattel slavery across France’s expanding colonial empire. What began as a set of 60 rules governing enslavement in France’s early Caribbean holdings — Martinique, Guadeloupe, and Saint-Domingue, the territory that would become the independent nation of Haiti after a successful enslaved uprising — was later extended to other French holdings including French Guiana, Louisiana, and the Indian Ocean islands of Réunion and Mauritius. French philosopher Louis Sala-Molins once described the document as “the most monstrous legal text of modern times,” a label that aligns with historical records of its brutal provisions.

    Over the course of France’s colonial slave trade, an estimated 1.4 million kidnapped African people were forcibly transported across the Atlantic Ocean in chains, making France the third-largest European slave-trading power behind only Portugal and Britain. The vast majority of enslaved people were forced to work in deadly, backbreaking conditions harvesting cash crops including sugar cane, coffee, cotton, and indigo for French colonial landowners. The labor was so lethal that the death rate among enslaved populations consistently outpaced birth rates, with planters simply replenishing their workforce by purchasing more kidnapped Africans from transatlantic slave traders.

    By 1789, Saint-Domingue alone held roughly 500,000 enslaved people — more than any other Caribbean colony of the era. The territory’s massive enslaved labor force produced the majority of the world’s sugar and coffee exports, earning it a reputation as the wealthiest colony on the planet at the time.

    While Code Noir was effectively rendered obsolete when France formally abolished slavery across its remaining colonies in 1848, it had never been formally removed from the country’s official legal statutes until the National Assembly’s historic vote this week.

    Every provision of the 337-year-old edict enshrined the dehumanization of enslaved people into law. Article 44 explicitly classified enslaved people as “movable property,” granting enslavers full legal right to buy, sell, mortgage, or bequeath enslaved people to their heirs, just like land or household furniture. Article 28 cemented this status by stating that enslaved people “could own nothing that does not belong to their master,” meaning any income or personal belongings an enslaved person acquired legally belonged to their enslaver. For more than a century after the edict took effect, enslaved people were not even granted legal personhood or formal names; starting in 1839, each enslaved person in French colonies was assigned only a serial number and registration code, with formal surnames only granted to people after abolition in 1848.

    The code codified extreme, often deadly punishments for people who resisted enslavement. Article 38 mandated punishment for people who attempted to escape bondage: for a first offense, the escapee would have their ears cut off and be branded with a fleur-de-lis, the official symbol of the French monarchy, on one shoulder. A second attempted escape resulted in the severing of a leg tendon and a second branding, while a third attempt carried a death sentence. Article 33 went even further, ordering capital punishment for any enslaved person who struck their enslaver, the enslaver’s wife, or their children hard enough to leave a bruise or draw blood, including any strike to the face.

    Many of the edict’s harmful provisions targeted marginalized groups beyond enslaved people as well. The very first article of Code Noir, before it addressed the regulation of slavery at all, ordered all Jewish people expelled from French colonies within a three-month window, labeling them “declared enemies of the Christian name.” Articles 2 and 3 forced all enslaved people to be baptized and raised in the Catholic faith, banning all public practice of any other religion. The edict also enshrined hereditary slavery, ruling that a child’s enslaved status followed the mother: any child born to an enslaved woman was born into slavery, even if the child’s father was a free person. Enslaved children were allocated just half the food rations granted to adult enslaved people.

    A small number of provisions were framed as nominal protections for enslaved people, requiring enslavers to provide basic food and clothing, banning excessive torture, and barring the separation of husbands, wives, and young children through sale. But historical research confirms these rules were almost universally ignored by colonial landowners, and enslavers who killed the people they held in bondage were almost never held legally accountable under the existing system.

  • From Arash to Epstein: Iran’s loaded billboard propaganda

    From Arash to Epstein: Iran’s loaded billboard propaganda

    In the months since the US-Israel military campaign against Iran launched in late February 2026, large, strategically placed billboards across Tehran’s busiest public corridors have flooded both traditional media and global social platforms. Constantly refreshed to align with shifting on-the-ground events, these outdoor installations are far more than urban decor: they represent a decades-long evolution of Iran’s state-led visual political communication, adapted for a modern digital age.

    Iran’s deployment of public space for ideological messaging traces back to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and expanded dramatically during the 1980s Iran-Iraq War, when murals and billboards were used to display revolutionary iconography, war memorials, and core ideological tenets to domestic audiences. Today, that model has been reimagined for global circulation. Designed from inception to be photographed, shared, and amplified online even amid Iran’s months-long national internet blackout, these contemporary billboards serve a clear dual purpose: to shore up collective national identity and unity during a period of open conflict, and to project the Iranian state’s narrative of power and resistance directly to international audiences. To reach these global targets, many now incorporate Hebrew and English text alongside native Farsi, a deliberate break from the purely domestic focus of past messaging.

    Researchers frame these installations as a core component of Iran’s broader state-led visual communications strategy, crafted specifically for viral spread across social media. To unpack the messaging and layered symbolism behind this campaign, we analyze five of the most widely circulated examples from Tehran’s urban landscape:

    ### 1. The Epstein Missile
    One of the most viral billboards in recent months, displayed at Tehran’s Valiasr Square in March 2026, features a cluster of Iranian missiles covered in handwritten symbolic inscriptions. The most prominent message, rendered in bold red Farsi, reads “To the girls of Minab” — a reference to a strike on a Minab girls’ school in the opening days of the war that Iranian authorities confirm killed 175 students and educators, with independent assessments pointing to U.S. forces as the likely perpetrators.

    Directly beneath that inscription, an English phrase adds a second provocative layer: “Epstein Island victim girls”, referencing the private island owned by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein where hundreds of young women were systematically sexually assaulted. A second missile bears the tribute “the girl with the pink jacket”, a reference to a young Iranian girl killed in a 2024 terrorist attack who was publicly identified by her distinctive pink jacket and heart-shaped earrings.

    This layered narrative weaves together seemingly disconnected events around a shared theme: vulnerable young women harmed by foreign violence, exploitation, and unaccountable political power. Rather than framing missiles purely as tools of destruction, the billboard reframes them as symbols of grief, remembrance, righteous revenge, and national defense. In this framing, Iran is not the aggressor in the conflict — it is a wronged power responding to injustice to protect its people.

    ### 2. “Masters of War”
    Displayed at Tehran’s Enqelab Square in October 2024, well before the full-scale war began, this high-impact billboard carried a direct multilingual warning. Above a stylized image of waves of incoming missiles lighting up the night sky over Israel (rendered to resemble a fiery meteor shower), a bold Farsi phrase reads “If you want war, we are masters of war”. Beneath it, a clear Hebrew message states “Israel must be wiped from the face of the earth”.

    By addressing Hebrew-speaking audiences directly, the billboard acts as both an explicit military warning and a deliberate show of psychological force, turning language itself into a tool of conflict. This multilingual choice signals a key shift in Iran’s urban propaganda strategy: no longer targeted solely at domestic pedestrians and commuters, the state designs these installations from the ground up for instant online circulation, knowing they will reach their intended target audiences across the border in Israel within hours of being erected.

    ### 3. Trump’s Sutured Mouth
    Targeted explicitly at Western, particularly American, audiences, this 2026 Valiasr Square billboard is a sharp, symbolic critique of U.S. policy toward Iran and the Strait of Hormuz. The core image shows U.S. President Donald Trump’s mouth, with a rendering of the Strait of Hormuz stitched (sutured) across its opening, paired with the blunt English headline “The Breaking Point”.

    The accompanying Farsi text translates to “its patience has run out”, and carries a clever literary pun: the Farsi word tang can mean both “narrowness/constraint” and refers to the “strait” (tangeh) of Hormuz, creating a double meaning that ties growing geopolitical tension over the waterway to the idea of Iran reaching an irreversible psychological and political breaking point. Beyond geopolitics, the image also satirizes Trump’s reputation for relentless public rhetoric and media attention: the sutures across his mouth symbolize the end of his unchecked influence and authority in the region, particularly when it comes to Iran and control of the Strait.

    ### 4. Arash the Archer
    Drawing on millennia of Persian cultural mythology, this July 2025 billboard at Tehran’s Vanak Square reimagines the legend of Arash the Archer for the modern conflict. In the iconic ancient tale, Arash sacrifices his own life to fire a decisive arrow during a mythic war between Iran and neighboring Turan, securing the borders of the Iranian homeland. On the billboard, Arash is depicted drawing his bow in the heat of battle, surrounded by modern Iranian missiles, framing contemporary Iranian soldiers as heirs to this legacy of sacrificial defense.

    The image also highlights the deep roots of modern Iranian political messaging in the nation’s centuries-old poetic, mythic, and heroic storytelling traditions, anchoring the current conflict in a long history of national struggle for sovereignty.

    ### 5. The Fishermen
    Displayed at Enghelab Square in April 2026, this billboard lays claim to Iranian dominance over the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz through a culturally resonant metaphor. The core image shows a massive fishing net stretched across the Persian Gulf, with captured American aircraft, drones, and naval vessels tangled inside. The Farsi text reads “The entire Persian Gulf is our hunting ground”, a clear assertion that the entire region falls under Iranian control and constant surveillance. The accompanying note “The Strait of Hormuz remains closed” emphasizes Iran’s ability to dictate access to one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints.

    Beyond its explicit geopolitical claim, the fishing net carries layered cultural meaning: just as traditional fishing relies on patience, resilience, careful planning, and long-term persistence rather than overwhelming brute force, the billboard frames Iran’s military strategy in the current conflict as rooted in these same deliberate, strategic qualities.

    *This analysis is by Hamideh Khaleghi Mohammadi, Lecturer in Media and Communications at the University of Sydney, and Ali Abbasi, Sessional Academic and Researcher in Media and Communications at the University of Sydney, republished with permission from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.*

  • Italy seizes gold, luxury villas and cash tied to Sicilian Mafia drug-trafficking gains

    Italy seizes gold, luxury villas and cash tied to Sicilian Mafia drug-trafficking gains

    MILAN – In a major strike against the Sicilian Mafia’s efforts to reconsolidate its financial stronghold, Italian law enforcement has confiscated over 200 million euros, equivalent to $232 million, in assets connected to the drug trafficking network of deceased notorious mafia boss Matteo Messina Denaro, anti-mafia prosecutors announced Thursday.

    At a press briefing detailing the operation, investigators outlined the wide scope of assets taken into custody: more than 12 kilograms (26 pounds) of high-purity gold bars, millions of euros in untraceable cash, a collection of high-end luxury watches, and approximately 20 upscale residential and commercial properties scattered across the country.

    Matteo Messina Denaro, one of Italy’s most wanted fugitives, spent 30 years evading capture before he was finally arrested in January 2023. Just nine months after his arrest, the 61-year-old mafia leader died at a prison hospital while serving multiple life sentences. He had already been convicted in absentia for dozens of high-profile murders, including his role as a mastermind behind the 1992 car bombings that killed Giovanni Falcone and Paolo Borsellino, two of Italy’s most prominent anti-mafia prosecutors.

    The landmark asset seizure is part of a long-running investigation into the multidecade money laundering trail that grew out of Messina Denaro’s international drug trafficking operation. Alongside the asset confiscation, law enforcement has already taken three suspects into custody tied to the network, and courts have approved seizure orders for all connected companies, offshore holdings, and financial accounts that make up the 200-million-euro criminal fortune.

    More than 150 elite financial police officers participated in coordinated search operations that stretched across Italy and seven offshore jurisdictions: Andorra, Gibraltar, the Cayman Islands, Switzerland, Lebanon, Monaco, and Spain, highlighting the global reach of Messina Denaro’s criminal enterprise.

    Giovanni Melillo, Italy’s national anti-mafia chief prosecutor, emphasized that the operation is a key part of a sustained national push to dismantle the Sicilian Mafia’s entire economic backbone. By stripping the organization of its accumulated criminal wealth, authorities aim to block the mafia from rebuilding powerful transnational criminal networks that can exert harmful influence over global finance, local communities, and public institutions through violence, intimidation, and corruption.

  • US justice department launches criminal investigation into Trump accuser E Jean Carroll, reports say

    US justice department launches criminal investigation into Trump accuser E Jean Carroll, reports say

    A major new development has emerged in the long-running legal battle between former President Donald Trump and writer E. Jean Carroll, with the U.S. Department of Justice launching a criminal investigation into whether Carroll committed perjury during her high-profile civil cases against Trump, multiple major U.S. media outlets have confirmed. Carroll, a one-time magazine columnist who successfully secured two civil defamation and sexual assault judgements against Trump, is now at the center of a federal probe focused on her testimony about outside funding for her legal actions against the former president.

    The inquiry centers on a 2022 deposition where Carroll stated she had not received any external financial support for her lawsuits against Trump. Court documents filed by Trump’s legal team in 2023 later revealed that Reid Hoffman, co-founder of professional networking platform LinkedIn, had contributed to covering a portion of Carroll’s legal fees and case-related expenses.

    This revelation was already challenged during the appeal process for Carroll’s first successful lawsuit against Trump. In a 2024 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found that Carroll had plausibly testified she had forgotten about the limited external funding arranged by her legal counsel, noting that the writer was not personally involved in decisions around who covered her litigation costs. The court upheld the original $5 million judgement against Trump in that first case, which stemmed from a jury finding Trump liable for sexual assault and defamation in 2023.

    That first case centered on Carroll’s allegation that Trump assaulted her in the dressing room of a New York City department store in the mid-1990s. The defamation claim arose from a 2022 Truth Social post where Trump denied the allegation entirely. A second civil trial in 2024 resulted in an additional $83 million defamation judgement against Trump, over comments he made in 2019 claiming Carroll fabricated the assault claim to boost book sales. Trump has repeatedly denied all accusations from Carroll, and has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the first 2023 judgement, with a promise to challenge the second ruling as well.

    According to sources cited by CBS News, the new criminal investigation is being led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois. CNN, which first broke news of the probe, noted that while Carroll’s deposition took place in New York, Hoffman’s non-profit organization is based in Chicago, placing the matter within the Northern District of Illinois’ jurisdiction.

    In a notable procedural development, sources confirmed that Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously served as Trump’s personal attorney during the appeals of the Carroll cases, has recused himself from the new investigation to avoid a conflict of interest. The BBC has reached out to the DOJ, Carroll’s legal representation, and Hoffman’s non-profit for official comment on the probe, and as of publication no official statements have been released from any of the parties.

    This new investigation comes as Trump, who returned to the presidency in 2025, has repeatedly called for the DOJ to pursue criminal prosecutions against a long list of his political and personal adversaries, a push that has sparked widespread debate over the independence of federal law enforcement in the current political climate.

  • Zelenskyy heads to Sweden as Ukraine touts drone expertise honed in war with Russia

    Zelenskyy heads to Sweden as Ukraine touts drone expertise honed in war with Russia

    On Thursday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy traveled to Stockholm to hold high-stakes bilateral defense negotiations with Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, marking another step in Kyiv’s ongoing push to secure additional military support from Western allies.

    Following the meeting, Zelenskyy announced via social media that the two nations are currently developing a landmark new defense assistance package, with negotiations advancing on an agreement to supply Saab Gripen fighter jets to Ukraine’s air force. This deal would mark a significant upgrade to Ukraine’s aerial capabilities, which have long been outmatched by Russia’s larger air fleet.

    A core pillar of Zelenskyy’s current global diplomacy has centered on reciprocal defense cooperation: Ukraine is now leveraging the specialized drone warfare expertise it has honed over more than four years of full-scale conflict with Russia to build deeper defense partnerships around the world. Zelenskyy confirmed that Ukrainian drone specialists have already assisted nations across the Middle East, particularly Gulf Arab states, in strengthening their air defense capabilities amid rising regional tensions tied to the Iran conflict. They have also provided support to U.S. military bases operating across the Middle East, he added. Beyond the Middle East, Ukraine has finalized joint drone production agreements with multiple European Union member states, where leaders share widespread concerns that Russian President Vladimir Putin holds broader military ambitions beyond Ukraine’s borders.

    On the battlefield, Ukraine’s domestic drone fleet has already proven to be a game-changing advantage against Russia’s much larger conventional military. Ukrainian drones routinely patrol the 1,250-kilometer front line stretching across eastern and southern Ukraine, and carry out deep strikes against Russian supply routes, slowing the advance of Moscow’s forces. In an updated assessment released late Wednesday, the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War confirmed this impact, noting that Ukraine’s successful mid-range and front-line drone strike campaigns have severely restricted Russia’s capacity to move troops to the front and resupply forward positions.

    Despite this tactical advantage, the conflict remains deeply lopsided in key areas. Russia currently occupies roughly 20 percent of Ukraine’s internationally recognized territory, including the Crimean Peninsula that Moscow illegally annexed in 2014. The human cost of Russia’s campaign has been staggering: the head of the United Kingdom’s GCHQ intelligence agency disclosed Wednesday that nearly 500,000 Russian soldiers have been killed in the conflict to date. Even so, Russia retains a significant quantitative edge in long-range ballistic missiles, which it has systematically used throughout the war to degrade Ukraine’s critical energy infrastructure and attack urban civilian centers.

    Last weekend, that escalating aerial campaign reached a new intensity when Russian forces launched a massive barrage against Kyiv, firing nearly 90 missiles alongside hundreds of attack drones in an attempt to overwhelm the capital’s air defense networks. In response to this escalating threat, Kyiv officials confirmed Wednesday that Zelenskyy has sent a formal letter to U.S. President Donald Trump and congressional leaders requesting additional American-made air defense ammunition to counter Russian ballistic missile attacks. In the letter, Zelenskyy stressed that Ukraine urgently needs more U.S. Patriot PAC-3 interceptors and other advanced air defense systems, warning that current delivery volumes have fallen to dangerously low levels as the ongoing Iran conflict diverts U.S. military stockpiles.

    As Kyiv prepares for expected further large-scale bombardments, no foreign diplomatic missions have followed Moscow’s recent recommendation to evacuate the capital ahead of what the Russian Foreign Ministry warned would be coming “systemic strikes” against Kyiv. On Thursday, Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry confirmed that all diplomatic missions based in the capital continue to operate as normal, with no suspensions or evacuations reported.

    The Associated Press continues to provide ongoing full coverage of the Russia-Ukraine war at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine.

  • Thai court acquits a progressive political leader on charges of royal defamation

    Thai court acquits a progressive political leader on charges of royal defamation

    BANGKOK – In a rare and closely watched ruling that has sent ripples through Thailand’s deeply polarized political landscape, the Bangkok Criminal Court issued an acquittal Thursday for Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, the prominent leader of Thailand’s Progressive Movement, clearing him of both royal defamation and computer crime charges stemming from a 2021 social media broadcast.

    The charges against Thanathorn originated from comments he made during a Facebook Live stream, where he criticized the administration of then-prime minister Prayuth Chan-ocha for its mismanagement of the national COVID-19 vaccination rollout. A core point of his criticism centered on a government vaccine production contract awarded to a firm owned by King Maha Vajiralongkorn. In its official statement, the court concluded that Thanathorn’s remarks were targeted at the Prayuth government’s policy failures, and carried no malicious or defamatory intent against the Thai monarchy.

    Thanathorn has long been one of the most visible critics of Thailand’s conservative political establishment. After co-founding the progressive Future Forward Party in 2018, the movement rose rapidly to claim third place in the 2019 general election, shaking up a political order dominated by military-backed factions for nearly a decade. However, the party was dissolved by the Constitutional Court in 2020 over alleged campaign finance violations, and Thanathorn was removed from parliament that same year over a technical dispute related to media shareholding.

    The party’s successor, the Move Forward Party, won a plurality of parliamentary seats in the 2023 general election, marking a historic breakthrough for Thai progressive politics. But conservative lawmakers and establishment actors blocked the party from forming a government, and Move Forward was itself disbanded by court order in 2024 over its proposal to reform the country’s controversial lese majeste law, Article 112 of the Thai criminal code. The movement’s latest iteration, the People’s Party, emerged as the second-largest bloc in the 2026 national election and currently serves as Thailand’s main parliamentary opposition.

    Article 112, Thailand’s lese majeste statute, imposes a maximum 15-year prison sentence for anyone convicted of insulting the monarchy. Critics of the law have long argued that it is systematically weaponized to suppress political dissent, a claim backed by data from human rights advocates. Thai Lawyers for Human Rights, an independent legal advocacy organization, records that more than 290 people – the majority of them young student activists – have faced Article 112 charges since pro-democracy protests led by youth activists erupted across the country in 2020. Those 2020 demonstrations centered demands on structural political reform, including changes to the lese majeste law itself. Acquittals in royal defamation cases are extremely uncommon in Thailand, where state institutions remain overwhelmingly aligned with conservative interests that guard the monarchy’s traditional status in national politics. A conviction on the additional charge under the Computer Crime Act would have carried a maximum five-year prison sentence.

    Speaking to reporters outside the courtroom immediately after the ruling, Thanathorn expressed relief and used the moment to draw attention to the dozens of political activists still detained on lese majeste charges. “They are not criminals in a literal sense,” he said. “They are in jail because they think and they speak.” He called for the immediate recognition of basic rights for all political prisoners held across the country. The Office of the Attorney General, which brought the case against Thanathorn, confirmed in a post-ruling press statement that it is currently reviewing the decision to consider whether to file an appeal.

  • Man cops $45,000 fine for distributing anonymous, illegal election pamphlets targeting Allegra Spender

    Man cops $45,000 fine for distributing anonymous, illegal election pamphlets targeting Allegra Spender

    A New South Wales man has received a substantial combined penalty of $45,000 after admitting to distributing tens of thousands of unauthorised, anonymous election pamphlets targeting sitting independent Member of Parliament Allegra Spender, in a case electoral officials have called one of the most blatant violations of Australian federal electoral law in recent memory.

    Jarrod Davis, a resident of the Wentworth electorate where Spender holds office, was ordered to pay $30,000 in civil penalties by the Federal Court on Thursday, following more than six months of legal proceedings initiated by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC). In addition to the penalty, Davis was also required to cover $15,000 of the AEC’s legal costs associated with the case, bringing the total financial penalty to $45,000.

    The illegal distribution of pamphlets took place in the lead-up to Australia’s upcoming 2025 federal election, across Spender’s Wentworth constituency. Davis disseminated approximately 47,000 anonymous leaflets, all targeted at the independent MP. According to an official statement from the AEC, the pamphlets failed to include the mandatory authorisation attribution required by federal electoral law, making their distribution a direct violation of national election regulations.

    Spender has publicly condemned the campaign, noting that the anonymous materials spread false, misleading, and deeply offensive claims about her record and policy positions. “This anonymous and misleading campaign is designed to undermine me and to benefit my political opponents,” Spender said in an official statement, adding that the lack of transparency around the pamphlets represented an attack on the integrity of local electoral contest.

    Despite the clear anti-Spender messaging in the distributed materials, the AEC has confirmed that it found no evidentiary link connecting Davis to any registered political party or opposing candidate standing for the Wentworth seat in the 2025 election. AEC Electoral Commissioner Jeff Pope emphasized that the court’s ruling sends a strong message about the importance of transparency in federal election campaign material.

    “Australian voters have a right to know the source of campaign material at a federal election, and today’s result reinforces this expectation as a fundamental aspect of electoral law,” Pope said. Legal observers note that the size of the penalty handed down in this case signals a firm stand by the courts against hidden, unregulated campaign activity that seeks to influence election outcomes without public accountability. The ruling also sets a clear precedent for future enforcement of electoral transparency rules ahead of the 2025 federal poll.

  • ‘Principled’: AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett defends Ben Roberts-Smith arrest

    ‘Principled’: AFP Commissioner Krissy Barrett defends Ben Roberts-Smith arrest

    Australia’s top federal law enforcement official has publicly outlined why authorities rejected a proposed voluntary surrender from former elite SAS soldier Ben Roberts-Smith, amid growing political scrutiny over the high-profile war crime arrest that has gripped national attention.

    In a defiant address during a Thursday Senate estimates hearing, Australian Federal Police (AFP) Commissioner Krissy Barrett defended the agency’s April decision to arrest Roberts-Smith at Sydney Domestic Airport, pushing back against widespread public and political backlash over the handling of the case.

    Barrett stressed that all investigative and procedural choices made by the AFP and the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) were rooted in principle, aligned with federal legislation and governance frameworks, and guided solely by evidence – not the notoriety or public standing of any individual.

    “We take an oath that we will faithfully and diligently carry out our duties without fear or favour, without affection or ill will. This is an extremely important point the Australian public can know,” Barrett told the hearing. “The AFP will determine cases on the evidence in front of us, and not because of name, fame, or background of any individual.”

    The hearing comes after days of questioning from Liberal Senator Michaelia Cash, who has challenged law enforcement officials over their approach to the Roberts-Smith case. In her detailed opening remarks, Barrett broke down the operational logic behind arresting Roberts-Smith at the Sydney airport rather than allowing him to turn himself in, or arresting him in the state of Queensland.

    Barrett explained that airports are classified as “sterile environments” with mandatory passenger screening and contained perimeters, factors that make arrest operations far safer for both responding officers and members of the public. Investigators also confirmed they had intelligence that Roberts-Smith had no known permanent address and was actively planning to relocate overseas, eliminating the option of waiting for a voluntary surrender. The choice of Sydney over Brisbane was a collaborative operational decision reached with partner agencies, Barrett added, dismissing widespread media speculation about hidden motives for the location as entirely inaccurate. She also noted that OSI officers were deployed specifically to the airport to provide support for Roberts-Smith’s family members who were travelling with him at the time of arrest.

    Addressing reports that Roberts-Smith had offered to hand himself in voluntarily ahead of the airport operation, Barrett confirmed that law enforcement had ultimately ruled the proposal unworkable. Citing the gravity of the charges against the former soldier – five counts of war crime-related murder, each carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment – Barrett said the surrender option was never considered a viable path for the investigation.

    Barrett also addressed unconfirmed reports of sensitive investigative information being leaked to media outlets ahead of the arrest. While she stressed there is no concrete evidence the AFP leaked any details, she confirmed the matter has been referred to the National Anti-Corruption Commission as a precautionary measure. “If the date of the individual’s arrest or other sensitive information was disclosed to anyone in the media, this could be an unauthorised disclosure, and in my view, anyone who disclosed that information should face consequences,” she said.

    Roberts-Smith was granted strict conditional bail earlier this year following his arrest. He has consistently maintained his innocence on all charges, has not entered any formal pleas, and his court proceeding remains ongoing.

  • Under President Milei’s austerity, disabled Argentines risk losing essential services

    Under President Milei’s austerity, disabled Argentines risk losing essential services

    For millions of Argentines living with disabilities, decades-old specialized therapy and support programs have long been more than just social services—they have been lifelines, opening doors to independence, connection, and personal growth that many could not access anywhere else. For 34-year-old Analía Celis, who lives with cerebral palsy and an intellectual disability, these programs transformed daily life: sports therapy softened the rigid muscle tension that limited her movement, baking gave her a tangible sense of self-reliance she had never known, and painting alongside peers allowed her to build connections when speech was a struggle. Today, that lifeline is being pulled away, a casualty of President Javier Milei’s sweeping austerity agenda that has gutted core funding for disability services across the country.

    Since taking office in late 2023, Milei, whose libertarian, small-government platform has positioned him as a leading figure in the global conservative backlash against liberal institutional norms, has frozen all federal payments to nonprofits and organizations that deliver therapeutic, educational, and social support to people with disabilities. Argentina is home to an estimated 5 million people living with disabilities, and advocates and family members warn that the funding freeze has rapidly dismantled a social safety net once considered robust by Latin American regional standards, stripping vulnerable people of the structured, personalized care they rely on.

    The financial strain has pushed many service providers to the edge of collapse. Martín Lucero, legal representative for Andar, a Buenos Aires-area nonprofit that operates a day support center for people with disabilities in Moreno, says his organization has been forced to sell off vehicles just to cover basic utility costs. Two months ago, Andar cut its free customized shuttle service that brought Celis and dozens of other participants to the center each day, leaving them stranded without access to programming. “The only solution can’t be cutting off a person from a space they need for their development,” Lucero said. “This is a political choice.”

    The nation’s disability support system has long operated on revenue generated by billing state-run insurance programs for services. For years, irregular government payments and reimbursement rates that failed to keep up with Argentina’s sky-high inflation left nonprofit providers with mounting debts. But six months ago, the flow of government funds stopped entirely, turning financial strain into a full-blown crisis. To cut costs, providers have slashed staff sizes, delayed employee salaries, reduced meal portions for program participants, and cut operating hours. While there is no official count of shuttered centers, disability rights groups estimate that up to 50 facilities have closed this year alone, many in remote rural provinces.

    At Andar, which serves 150 participants on its sprawling, park-like campus that includes a soccer field, community vegetable garden, and professional commercial kitchen where participants earn a small monthly wage through a catering service, roughly 30% of enrollees can no longer travel to the center. Therapists warn that without consistent, structured programming, people with disabilities can experience rapid regression in skills and quality of life. For Celis, that regression has already been devastating. Her 74-year-old mother, Clementina Tabares, now has to provide round-the-clock care for her daughter, forcing her to skip her own critical medical appointments. “She wakes up three or four times every night screaming that she wants to go to the farm,” Tabares said, describing how Celis now spends all day in bed, the window covered with a blanket to block sunlight, with rock music blaring to calm her frequent agitation. “She’s shutting herself away. That scares me.”

    For 28-year-old Roman Pontecorvo, an Andar participant who found a love for acting through the center’s programs, the potential closure of Andar would leave him with nothing. “I want to tell the president to look at us, to really see us, to come here and meet us,” Pontecorvo said. “If Andar closes, many of us will be left with nothing. It will be total chaos.”

    Disability rights advocates have pushed for a straightforward solution to the crisis: enacting a disability emergency law passed by Congress last year that would boost benefits that have lost 30% of their value to inflation and guarantee stable funding for service providers through 2026. But Milei has blocked the law from taking effect, arguing that its 0.35% of GDP fiscal cost would undermine his administration’s landmark achievement of a national budget surplus, Argentina’s first after decades of persistent deficits. Milei vetoed the bill last year, saying “using noble causes, they pass laws that drive the nation into bankruptcy,” but Congress overrode his veto. The dispute is now tied up in court, where the government is appealing a May 18 federal court ruling that ordered the administration to unfreeze payments within 72 hours to comply with the existing law. The judge’s ruling noted that “the interruption of treatment generates setbacks in development” for people with disabilities.

    Milei has instead introduced a sweeping new bill that would formally dismantle the existing system of federal funding for therapeutic centers, shifting responsibility to private insurance companies and provincial governments to negotiate payment rates with providers. The legislation would also impose strict new eligibility restrictions, ending federal subsidies for all disabled people except those living below the poverty line with “complete” and “permanent” disabilities. The bill has faced intense backlash from rights groups and is still awaiting debate in Congress.

    The Milei administration has framed its cuts to disability programs as part of a broader effort to root out fraud and waste in federal bureaucracy, echoing the anti-spending rhetoric of ideological allies like the former Trump administration in the United States. Months ago, Argentine officials amplified claims of widespread fraud, even highlighting a bizarre case where a dog’s X-ray was allegedly submitted to falsely secure disability benefits, echoing a similar false claim by billionaire Elon Musk that millions of dead Americans were receiving U.S. Social Security checks. But authorities have never presented evidence of systemic, widespread abuse, and the scale of existing fraud remains unconfirmed.

    Instead, the scandal that has emerged from the disability agency centers on high-level corruption accusations tied to Milei’s own inner circle. Leaked recordings from last year captured Diego Spagnuolo, the former director of Argentina’s national disability agency Andis, alleging that Karina Milei, the president’s sister and closest senior adviser, accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies seeking federal public contracts. Milei has denied any wrongdoing on his sister’s behalf. As auditing of the agency ramped up, the administration shut down Andis entirely, laying off hundreds of workers and folding disability programs into the Ministry of Health.

    While even critics of the old system acknowledge that greater transparency and anti-fraud reform are needed, they argue that the Milei administration’s goal is not to improve the system but to eliminate it entirely. Last year, the Civic Association for Equality and Justice successfully sued the government after Andis suspended 140,000 disability benefit checks over unproven fraud suspicions. Celeste Fernandez, the group’s co-director, noted that most of the suspended beneficiaries only missed required in-person assessments because the nearest assessment office was hundreds of miles from their homes, and many could not travel or understand the complicated summons. “Dismantling institutions without building alternatives leaves people abandoned,” Fernandez said. “The government is not carrying out a serious reform. It is simply emptying the system.”

  • Australia launches record $1.4B lawsuit against 3M over ‘forever chemicals’ at defense bases

    Australia launches record $1.4B lawsuit against 3M over ‘forever chemicals’ at defense bases

    On Thursday, the Australian government announced a landmark legal action against U.S.-based industrial conglomerate 3M and its Australian subsidiary, seeking more than 1.4 billion U.S. dollars (equivalent to 2 billion Australian dollars) in compensation for widespread toxic “forever chemical” contamination linked to firefighting foams used across national defense sites. The compensation claim, the largest the Australian federal government has ever pursued, stems from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, pollution that has affected soil and water resources at 28 defense installations across the country.

    PFAS are a class of synthetic human-made compounds that have earned the nickname “forever chemicals” due to their inability to break down naturally in the environment, leading them to accumulate in ecosystems and human bodies over decades. First widely adopted in the 1950s, PFAS became a staple ingredient in a range of household and industrial products thanks to their unique ability to resist heat, stains, grease, and water. For firefighting teams, PFAS-infused foam became a go-to solution for quickly extinguishing volatile fuel-based fires, making it a standard fixture at military bases and civilian airports globally.

    Australia filed the lawsuit at the country’s Federal Court, opening a high-stakes legal battle between the national government and one of the world’s largest manufacturing conglomerates, which has already confirmed it will vigorously contest the claim. In an official statement responding to the action, 3M pushed back against the allegations, noting that the company never manufactured PFAS on Australian soil and halted sales of the PFAS-containing products in question roughly 20 years ago. The company argues that the Australian Department of Defense continued to use the existing stockpiles of PFAS-laden firefighting foam for almost two additional decades after sales stopped, placing responsibility for the ongoing contamination on the department itself.

    The Australian government, however, accuses 3M of long withholding critical information about the severe environmental and public health risks posed by PFAS-containing foam. Attorney-General Michelle Rowland outlined that the federal government is seeking compensation to cover both past and future costs of addressing the contamination crisis, which has required extensive investigation, remediation, and public health monitoring across affected communities.

    PFAS contamination linked to defense base foam use first made national headlines in Australia in 2018, when the Department of Defense issued an official warning to residents living near Richmond Air Base, located on the outskirts of Sydney. After testing confirmed dangerous levels of PFAS in local groundwater, authorities advised nearby residents to reduce their consumption of locally caught fish and farmed eggs, sparking widespread community concern over long-term health impacts.

    Assistant Defense Minister Peter Khalil shared that the federal government has already spent roughly 920 million U.S. dollars (1.3 billion Australian dollars) on efforts to manage and mitigate the environmental damage caused by the PFAS contamination. To date, remediation teams have removed more than 200,000 metric tons of contaminated soil from affected defense bases and treated more than 13 billion liters of PFAS-tainted water. Khalil emphasized the government’s commitment to holding powerful entities accountable when Australian communities face harm from corporate activity, saying “We are prepared to take on powerful corporations when Australians and Australian communities have been impacted.”