分类: business

  • Elusive Shein boss hails Chinese roots in rare public appearance

    Elusive Shein boss hails Chinese roots in rare public appearance

    In a rare public address, Shein founder Xu Yangtian (also known as Sky Xu) has committed substantial investment to China’s fashion industry while reaffirming the company’s deep ties to its manufacturing homeland. Speaking at the High-quality Development Conference in Guangzhou, the reclusive billionaire announced plans to invest over 10 billion yuan ($1.45 billion) to establish a high-tech fashion hub in Guangdong province.

    Xu emphasized the symbiotic relationship between Shein’s global success and Guangdong’s industrial ecosystem, praising the region’s ‘world-class business environment’ and ‘complete industrial ecosystem.’ His remarks, delivered to provincial officials and business leaders, marked a significant departure from his typically private profile and were widely circulated across Chinese social media platforms.

    The investment pledge comes despite Shein’s strategic distancing from China in recent years, including its headquarters relocation to Singapore and exploration of stock market listings in New York and London. Xu acknowledged Guangdong as ‘fertile ground’ for development, noting that local support has already enabled Shein to generate over 600,000 jobs in the region.

    The announcement occurs against a backdrop of increasing challenges for Chinese global retailers. Shein currently faces EU investigations regarding potential digital law violations, including the controversial sale of childlike sex dolls through its platform. The company has responded by removing the listings and banning responsible sellers while strengthening platform regulations.

    Additional pressures include heightened scrutiny from Western markets, particularly regarding environmental sustainability concerns and labor conditions within fast-fashion supply chains. The company’s expansion plans continue nonetheless, with new retail locations scheduled to open in French cities following delayed launches in December.

  • New US tariff starts at 10%, Trump administration working to hike it to 15%

    New US tariff starts at 10%, Trump administration working to hike it to 15%

    The United States commenced enforcement of a provisional 10% universal import tariff on Tuesday, creating significant uncertainty in global trade circles as the Trump administration simultaneously works toward implementing a more substantial 15% levy. This development follows President Donald Trump’s recent Supreme Court defeat regarding previous tariff mechanisms.

    President Trump initially executed an executive order on Friday mandating a 10% tariff with a 150-day duration, designed to replace comprehensive duties previously invalidated by the Supreme Court. However, in a surprising reversal on Saturday, the president declared his intention to elevate the rate to 15%. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency subsequently notified shipping entities Monday evening that collections would commence at the lower 10% rate, citing the absence of updated formal presidential documentation.

    A White House official confirmed to Reuters that Trump maintains unwavering commitment to implementing the 15% tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, though no specific timeline was provided for this anticipated increase. The official emphasized that the president’s determination remains unchanged despite the current implementation at the reduced rate.

    The policy shift has generated considerable confusion within international trade markets, with no official explanation provided for the discrepancy between announced intentions and implemented rates. Financial analysts from Deutsche Bank suggested the situation might clarify following Trump’s scheduled State of the Union address, while maintaining that effective tariff rates would likely decrease overall compared to pre-Supreme Court ruling levels.

    Market reactions reflected this uncertainty, with global stocks opening lower Tuesday despite the less punitive than expected tariff rate. U.S. markets demonstrated resilience however, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbing 0.65%, the S&P 500 Index advancing 0.5%, and the technology-focused Nasdaq increasing 0.8% by midday trading.

    The new tariff structure presents particular complications for the European Union, which previously negotiated a trade agreement predicated on a 15% base tariff rate. European Commission Trade Minister Maros Sefcovic acknowledged a “transitional period” regarding the temporary tariff but received assurances from U.S. trade officials that Washington would honor existing agreements.

    Legal experts note that Section 122 authorization permits presidential imposition of duties for up to 150 days to address “large and serious” balance-of-payments deficits. Trump’s order cited a $1.2 trillion annual goods trade deficit, a current account deficit representing 4% of GDP, and reversal of the U.S. primary income surplus as justification. However, numerous economists and trade attorneys contest the characterization of an imminent balance-of-payments crisis, suggesting the new tariffs remain vulnerable to legal challenges.

    Concurrently, the Trump administration issued warnings to international partners against retreating from previously negotiated trade arrangements, threatening significantly higher duties under alternative statutory authorities should countries disengage from existing agreements. Japan, the European Union, Britain, and Taiwan all indicated preferences to maintain their current trade deals with the United States.

    ING’s Global Head of Macro Carsten Brzeski observed that despite the 150-day limitation on current measures, trade uncertainty will likely persist given the potential for consecutive extensions. Meanwhile, China’s commerce ministry expressed willingness to conduct additional trade discussions with the United States while simultaneously urging Washington to abandon its “unilateral tariffs.”

  • Domino’s slashes ‘crazy’ cheap pizza deals, profits surge $60m

    Domino’s slashes ‘crazy’ cheap pizza deals, profits surge $60m

    In a dramatic financial reversal, Domino’s Pizza Enterprises, Australia’s largest pizza franchise, has reported a monumental $60 million turnaround in profits, crediting its decision to eliminate deep discounting strategies. The company announced an after-tax profit of $40.9 million for the half-year, a significant recovery from the $22.2 million loss recorded during the same period last year.

    The strategic shift involved a deliberate move away from what Chairman Jack Cowin termed ‘crazy price stuff’—aggressive coupon deals that, while driving high sales volume, ultimately eroded franchisee profitability. This recalibration resulted in a 1.6% dip in overall company sales, a consequence the company anticipated and accepted in its pursuit of sustainable earnings.

    With 3,518 stores spanning Australia, New Zealand, Asia, and Europe, Domino’s new focus is on ‘profitable promotions.’ While same-store sales declined in the ANZ region (4.7%) and Asia (6.1%), they saw a modest 1.3% increase in Europe. Crucially, the health of the franchise network improved markedly, with average store profitability rising from $98,600 to $103,000—the first such increase in three years.

    Analyst Josh Gilbert from eToro highlighted the significance of the strategy, noting that Domino’s is now prioritizing the value of each transaction over sheer volume. This approach ensures franchisees remain profitable, which in turn fuels further investment and store expansion. Supporting this, the company has also reduced its advertising spend and interim dividend to 21.5 cents per share, reflecting a disciplined financial management approach despite a 14% drop in its share price following the announcement.

  • SpiceJet Jaipur–Dubai flight cancelled after 11-hour delay; passengers left stranded

    SpiceJet Jaipur–Dubai flight cancelled after 11-hour delay; passengers left stranded

    A major operational disruption unfolded at Jaipur International Airport on Tuesday as SpiceJet Flight SG-57 to Dubai was abruptly cancelled following an extensive 11-hour delay, leaving hundreds of passengers stranded without adequate support. The incident has sparked serious concerns regarding airline communication protocols and passenger welfare management during service interruptions.

    The flight was originally scheduled for a 9:40 AM IST departure but underwent multiple rescheduling throughout the day before ultimately being canceled around 8:30 PM IST. This left travelers, including vulnerable groups such as elderly passengers, women, and children, in a state of uncertainty and discomfort. Numerous passengers reported spending the entire day within airport premises, with some forced to wait outside terminal buildings due to insufficient facilities.

    Affected traveler Ankur expressed his frustration: ‘I have been here since morning. Had they provided timely information about the cancellation, I would have returned home instead of enduring this prolonged wait.’ The lack of transparent communication from airline representatives emerged as a primary complaint among stranded passengers, who also reported insufficient assistance during the extended delay period.

    While unofficial sources cited operational and technical challenges as contributing factors, SpiceJet had not issued an official statement regarding the incident at the time of reporting. Flight tracking platforms including FlightRadar confirmed the eventual cancellation of the Dubai-bound service.

    The incident occurs amid ongoing analysis of the India-UAE air corridor’s capacity challenges, with recent studies indicating potential service gaps affecting significant portions of passengers by 2035. This event raises pertinent questions about airline accountability and emergency response mechanisms in the rapidly expanding aviation market between the two nations.

  • Poll: US tariffs on Chinese goods ‘too high’

    Poll: US tariffs on Chinese goods ‘too high’

    A comprehensive survey conducted by the Council on Foreign Relations in partnership with Morning Consult reveals significant American opposition to current tariff levels on Chinese imports. The study, conducted January 7-8 among 2,203 nationally representative adults, found that 49% of respondents consider existing tariffs “too high,” while only 6% believe they are too low.

    The research emerges amid escalating trade tensions, with a new 10% universal tariff implemented this Tuesday through Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. According to White House officials cited by the Financial Times, this temporary levy is scheduled to increase to 15% within 150 days.

    Political affiliation substantially influences tariff perceptions, with 67% of Democratic supporters viewing current Chinese tariffs as excessive compared to 46% of Republicans who consider them “about right.” The survey indicates three-fifths of Americans believe even a modest 10% tariff increase would adversely affect consumers, middle-class households, small businesses, and the broader economy.

    The report cites Yale Budget Lab data showing peak tariff rates reached 135% in April 2025 before moderating to 24% by January. Other analyses from the Center for Strategic and International Studies estimate combined sectoral and IEEPA tariffs currently average 47.5%.

    Despite divided opinions on trade volume with China—over one-quarter of respondents expressed no clear preference—the survey reveals strong bipartisan support for cooperation on specific issues. Sixty-five percent of Americans endorse collaborative efforts in technological innovation, educational exchanges, poverty reduction, manufacturing modernization, and global health research.

    The findings suggest generational differences in China perceptions, with 38% of adults aged 18-34 describing China as a friend or ally compared to just 11% of those aged 65 and above.

    China’s Ministry of Commerce responded to developments by calling for revocation of unilateral tariffs and expressing willingness to engage in candid consultations during upcoming sixth-round economic talks. This follows last week’s Supreme Court ruling that President Trump exceeded authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act when imposing sweeping tariffs.

  • Paramount boosts Warner Bros offer to rival Netflix in takeover bid

    Paramount boosts Warner Bros offer to rival Netflix in takeover bid

    In a dramatic escalation of the media industry’s most consequential takeover battle, Paramount Skydance has substantially enhanced its acquisition proposal for Warner Bros Discovery, potentially undermining Netflix’s competing bid. The revised offer represents a strategic maneuver to position Paramount as the preferred suitor in this high-value corporate contest.

    The intensified negotiations follow Warner Bros’ decision to explore sale options last year, with Paramount now consenting to augment its purchase price by one dollar per share. This improved bid has been formally recognized by Warner Bros’ board as potentially constituting a ‘superior proposal’ that could justify abandoning its pre-existing arrangement with Netflix.

    According to corporate disclosure documents, Warner Bros intends to conduct additional discussions with Paramount before rendering a definitive verdict regarding the December agreement with Netflix. The streaming giant maintains a four-day window to submit a counter-proposal, though company representatives declined immediate commentary regarding the heightened bidding competition.

    Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos previously characterized the negotiation dynamics as ‘part of the process’ during a BBC interview, emphasizing the company’s disciplined acquisition philosophy. ‘We’re very disciplined buyers and we always have been,’ Sarandos remarked prior to Paramount’s improved offer, while acknowledging the inherent ‘price-discovery’ nature of major media acquisitions.

    Paramount Skydance, backed by technology billionaire Larry Ellison and helmed by his son David Ellison, has pursued an aggressive acquisition strategy throughout the past year. The company aims to establish itself as a dominant Hollywood entity through the Warner Bros purchase, though its previous offers were consistently rejected.

    The existing Netflix arrangement, valued at $27.75 per share or approximately $82 billion including debt obligations, would transfer Warner Bros’ film production assets and streaming services including HBO to the streaming platform. Under this scenario, Warner Bros would spin off its remaining operations—encompassing traditional television networks and CNN news division—as an independent corporate entity.

    Paramount’s revised proposal now offers $31 per share in cash compensation, supplemented by additional financial considerations for transaction delays. The sweetened deal includes a substantial $7 billion breakup fee provision should regulatory intervention prevent acquisition completion, alongside coverage of Warner Bros’ $2.8 billion termination penalty payable to Netflix if their merger agreement dissolves.

    The escalating bidding war has attracted regulatory scrutiny, with lawmakers expressing concerns about potential market consolidation effects and broader entertainment industry implications. During recent Congressional hearings, Netflix executives faced questioning regarding potential consumer price increases and cinematic exhibition industry consequences.

    Additional political dimensions have emerged through the Ellison family’s connections to the Trump administration, drawing attention from Democratic legislators. Warner Bros’ board maintains that no final determination has been reached, with further negotiations planned to evaluate whether Paramount’s proposal indeed qualifies as a definitively superior offer.

    Industry analysts suggest Warner Bros may be strategically orchestrating competitive bidding dynamics. Madison and Wall managing director Luke Stillman predicted prior to the latest offer revelation that acquisition values might ultimately reach $33 per share, indicating significant remaining negotiation leverage.

  • UAE carrier flydubai announces terminal change for Riyadh flights from Feb 25

    UAE carrier flydubai announces terminal change for Riyadh flights from Feb 25

    Dubai-based airline flydubai has implemented significant operational changes for its Saudi Arabian routes, announcing the relocation of all Riyadh flights from Terminal 3 to Terminal 5 at King Khalid International Airport (RUH) effective February 25, 2026.

    The terminal transition will commence with flights FZ 843 and FZ 844 marking the final departures from Terminal 3 on the Riyadh-Dubai route. Subsequently, flights FZ 849 and FZ 850 will initiate operations from the newly designated Terminal 5 facility on the same date.

    This strategic move comes as the Dubai-Riyadh air corridor continues to demonstrate substantial passenger volume, having recently been ranked as the world’s seventh busiest international route. Aviation industry data for 2025 revealed approximately 4.465 million available seats on this route, underscoring its significance within global aviation networks.

    The terminal reassignment reflects flydubai’s ongoing operational optimization efforts and potential infrastructure adjustments at Riyadh’s primary aviation hub. Passengers booked on Riyadh-bound or departing flights are advised to verify terminal information before commencing travel arrangements to ensure seamless transit experience.

    Industry analysts suggest such terminal reallocations typically aim to enhance operational efficiency, improve passenger flow management, and potentially accommodate future route expansions or increased flight frequencies on high-demand corridors.

  • Apple says some Mac Mini production will move to the US

    Apple says some Mac Mini production will move to the US

    In a strategic move signaling a shift in global manufacturing priorities, Apple Inc. has announced it will commence production of its Mac Mini desktop computers in the United States for the first time. The technology giant revealed plans on Tuesday for a substantial expansion of its manufacturing facility in Houston, Texas, where it will produce both Mac Mini devices and artificial intelligence servers.

    This decision emerges amid sustained pressure from the Trump administration to increase domestic manufacturing. President Donald Trump had previously singled out Apple, threatening tariff increases if the company failed to relocate iPhone production to American soil. Apple has already absorbed over $3 billion in tariffs during Trump’s second term.

    The announcement represents part of Apple’s broader commitment to invest $600 billion in the United States, as pledged last year. Chief Executive Tim Cook stated, ‘Apple is deeply committed to the future of American manufacturing, and we’re proud to significantly expand our footprint in Houston with the production of Mac mini starting later this year.’

    While Mac Mini computers currently represent less than 5% of total Mac sales and have traditionally been manufactured in Asia, this move symbolizes Apple’s responsiveness to political and economic pressures. The company also plans to establish an advanced manufacturing training center at its Houston location.

    The manufacturing shift comes during a period of trade policy uncertainty. Following the Supreme Court’s recent blockage of many Trump-era import taxes, the administration has proposed implementing a 10-15% global tariff rate.

    Financial markets responded positively to the announcement, with Apple shares climbing more than 2% on Tuesday. However, analysts caution that substantial changes to Apple’s extensive supply chain—which generates approximately half its revenue from iPhones manufactured in China, Vietnam, and India—will require significant time and strategic planning.

  • Paramount submits higher offer for Warner Bros Discovery in bid to block Netflix, source says

    Paramount submits higher offer for Warner Bros Discovery in bid to block Netflix, source says

    In a dramatic escalation of the high-stakes corporate battle for media supremacy, Paramount Skydance has formally submitted a heightened acquisition proposal for Warner Bros Discovery (WBD), according to a source with direct knowledge of the negotiations. This strategic maneuver aims to dismantle WBD’s existing arrangement with streaming titan Netflix, setting the stage for an unprecedented showdown in the entertainment industry.

    The revised bid, which improves upon Paramount’s initial offer of $108.4 billion ($30 per share), specifically addresses WBD’s previous concerns regarding financial certainty. While exact financial particulars remain undisclosed, this development represents a critical juncture in the contest for control of legendary entertainment properties, including the coveted “Harry Potter” and “Game of Thrones” franchises.

    Netflix, which had previously secured a $82.7 billion ($27.75 per share) agreement with WBD, retains contractual rights to match Paramount’s enhanced proposal. Industry analysts from MoffettNathanson suggest that an offer approaching $34 per share from Paramount could effectively conclude the bidding competition.

    The corporate drama has attracted significant attention from activist investors, with Ancora Capital accumulating a $200 million position in WBD and publicly pressuring the board to engage substantively with Paramount’s proposal. The investor group has threatened to vote against the Netflix arrangement and hold directors accountable during upcoming shareholder meetings if negotiations with Paramount are not reopened.

    Regulatory considerations present another complex dimension to this corporate saga. Paramount claims to have already secured preliminary clearance in Germany and asserts having a more straightforward regulatory pathway than Netflix. Conversely, a Netflix-WBD combination would create the world’s largest streaming platform with approximately 500 million subscribers, potentially triggering intense antitrust scrutiny from U.S. and European authorities concerned about market concentration and consumer choice.

    WBD shareholders are scheduled to decide on the Netflix proposal on March 20, though this timeline may shift given Paramount’s latest intervention. The outcome will fundamentally reshape the global media landscape, determining whether traditional studio assets align with streaming-first platforms or consolidate within expanded entertainment conglomerates.

  • Staff underpayment costs wipe $485m from Woolworths’ first-half net profit

    Staff underpayment costs wipe $485m from Woolworths’ first-half net profit

    Australian retail giant Woolworths has disclosed its financial performance for the first half of the fiscal year, revealing a substantial 49.4% decline in net profit to $374 million. This significant downturn primarily stems from a $485 million expenditure allocated to remediating underpaid salaried employees, following a Federal Court ruling issued last September.

    Despite the profit contraction, the supermarket chain demonstrated robust operational health with group earnings surging 14.4% to $1.66 billion. Profit before accounting for significant items showed impressive growth, climbing 16.4% to $859 million. The company’s Australian operations recorded sales growth of 3.6%, reaching $27.63 billion for the six-month period ending December, while earnings from these stores increased by 9.9% to $1.51 billion.

    Chief Executive Officer Amanda Bardwell characterized the supermarket sector as “highly competitive” while maintaining an optimistic outlook about the company’s trajectory. She emphasized that customers remain intensely value-conscious, frequently shopping across multiple retailers to maximize their purchasing power.

    “Our strategic focus remains on delivering continuous value to our customers, rebuilding trust within the community, sustaining sales momentum, and advancing our key priorities to benefit customers, team members, and shareholders alike,” Bardwell stated in her ASX announcement.

    In a move reflecting confidence in its financial position, Woolworths declared an increased interim dividend of 45 cents per share, up from the previous 39 cents, scheduled for payment on April 2.