作者: admin

  • Why Haiti v Scotland was antidote to the ills of world football

    Why Haiti v Scotland was antidote to the ills of world football

    For 28 long years, Scotland’s football fans had been locked out of the World Cup, forced to watch from the sidelines as the world’s biggest football tournament rolled on without them. So when thousands of members of the famous Tartan Army found themselves stuck in crippling traffic gridlock on the highway to Foxborough’s Boston Stadium ahead of their opening 2026 World Cup group match against Haiti, there was not a hint of frustration – only unbridled joy.

    Four hours before kickoff, a line of yellow school buses carrying jubilant Scottish supporters crawled along Interstate 95 at just one mile per hour. Fans leaned out of every window, belting out traditional anthems, waving blue and white flags, and turning the slow-moving convoy into an impromptu street party, completely unaware of the nail-biting tension that would unfold on the pitch hours later. The anticipation across the entire city of Boston was tangible; clusters of Scotland fans packed every street corner, turning the area into a sea of tartan that felt less like a visiting crowd and more than a joyful invasion.

    When the Scottish team walked out onto the pitch just before 9 p.m. local time, the Boston Stadium erupted into a cacophony of noise and color. Giant screens behind each goal captured every raw emotion on the stands, from tearful grins to thunderous cheers as the crowd sang *Flower of Scotland* with a ferocity that manager Steve Clarke would later note felt even more powerful on foreign soil than it does at Hampden Park. For a side that had waited a generation to return to the World Cup finals, the moment was electric – a raw, authentic rebuke to the commercialism and greed that plagues modern global football.

    The match got off to a promising start for Scotland, but the side quickly faded, letting Haiti, ranked 83rd in the world, grow into the contest. The Caribbean side grew bolder as the half wore on, creating more clear chances than the heavily favored Scots, even if they failed to convert their opportunities. With less than 30 minutes on the clock, a small section of the Tartan Army began chanting for Aston Villa midfielder John McGinn, urging their talisman to deliver a moment of magic. Two minutes later, he answered the call.

    McGinn’s winning goal was far from a technical masterpiece: the scruffy strike took two deflections before looping into the Haitian net, but that detail meant nothing to the jubilant crowd. It was Scotland’s first goal at a World Cup finals in a generation, and it put Clarke’s side 1-0 up, lifting their total of all-time World Cup finals wins from four to five. Rare moments like this do not need to be pretty to be perfect.

    Instead of pushing on to extend their lead after the break, Scotland retreated into a defensive shell, unable to impose their game on a hungry Haiti side. For the final 20 minutes, the Scots hung on desperately, their defense littered with errors and constantly pinned deep inside their own half. With 12 minutes left on the clock, the Tartan Army dug into their songbook for a dry, gallows-humored rendition of “No Scotland No Party” – a ironic tweak on their favorite anthem, as the entire crowd held its breath through every attacking Haiti thrust. The tension was so thick you could cut it: with six minutes remaining, Haiti striker Frantzdy Pierrot rose above center-back Grant Hanley and sent a header inches wide of the post, sending heart rates soaring across the Scottish section.

    A late equalizer would not just have stolen a point for Haiti – it would have gutted Scotland’s hopes of progressing out of the group stage, a historic first for the nation. If they could not beat Haiti, there seemed little hope of taking points from heavyweights Brazil or Morocco in their remaining group matches. Pierrot had another golden chance late on and missed again, while panicked Scottish defenders cleared lines frantically rather than playing the composed football they are capable of.

    What was supposed to be a relatively comfortable return to the World Cup stage for Scotland turned into a 90-minute rollercoaster of nerves, an exhausting contest that left both players and fans drained. But at the final whistle, the scoreboard still read 1-0, and the 36-year wait for a World Cup finals win was over.

    Post-match reactions summed up the conflicting mood in the camp: three points on the board, but plenty of work to do. McGinn, who spoke after the game beaming with pride, admitted the side has higher gears that they did not show on the night, a sentiment echoed by Clarke, who described the match as a must-win that his side had grinded out. Goalkeeper Angus Gunn acknowledged that the performance was far from perfect, but stressed that a World Cup win is still a win. Young winger Ben Gannon-Doak was Scotland’s stand-out player, his constant running causing Haiti problems all evening, while key stars like Billy Gilmour, Scott McTominay (who hit the post late on) and even McGinn failed to exert their usual control over the match outside of the winning goal.

    On Monday morning, the squad will return to their Charlotte base tired but victorious, with six days to iron out their mistakes before their second group match against Morocco back in Boston. The win sparked wild celebrations among the Tartan Army, but most supporters admitted the mood was more relief than unfiltered joy. Still, after waiting 28 years just to be back at the World Cup, even the most nail-biting win is enough. Thousands of fans are already planning to return for the Morocco match, ready for another night of anxiety and pressure – and adamant there is nowhere else they would rather be.

  • EU foreign policy chief compares Israel to apartheid South Africa: Report

    EU foreign policy chief compares Israel to apartheid South Africa: Report

    A leaked account of closed-door diplomatic talks has pulled back the curtain on a stark contradiction at the heart of European Union foreign policy: EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas has privately drawn a parallel between Israel’s treatment of Palestinians and the racial apartheid system that governed South Africa for decades, multiple sources familiar with the discussion have confirmed.

    The revelation, first reported by Euractiv, places Kallas’s off-the-record views in direct tension with her very public, unwavering support for Israel amid the ongoing devastating conflict in Gaza and accelerating Israeli settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank. According to individuals with direct knowledge of the meeting, Kallas made the comparison during confidential discussions with Mexican officials in Mexico City, where she led a high-level EU delegation on an official visit from May 20 to 22.

    During the conversation, Kallas referenced her 2024 visit to South Africa’s apartheid museum in Johannesburg, framing the structural systems Israel has imposed on Palestinian communities in Gaza and the occupied West Bank as analogous to the formal racial segregation that defined South Africa from 1948 through the early 1990s.

    Kallas’s characterization is far from unprecedented. For years, the United Nations, International Court of Justice, leading global human rights organizations, academic scholars, and international legal experts have formally classified Israel’s long-term domination of Palestinian territories as apartheid. Two EU member states, Ireland and Spain, have also publicly affirmed that Israel’s actions in occupied Palestinian territories meet the legal definition of apartheid.

    What makes Kallas’s leaked remarks so significant is the sharp dissonance with her public posture. Since taking office, Kallas has positioned herself as one of Israel’s most prominent defenders in European politics. She has repeatedly backed Israel’s military campaign in Gaza — a conflict that has killed more than 40,000 Palestinians according to Gaza health authorities, displaced most of the territory’s population, and triggered a catastrophic humanitarian famine that the International Court of Justice has warned amounts to a violation of the Genocide Convention. As recently as March 2025, during a joint press conference in Tel Aviv alongside Israeli officials, Kallas reaffirmed that the EU stood “in solidarity with Israel and its people,” adding that “the security of Israel is extremely important to the European Union” and emphasizing that Israelis “must feel safe in their homes.”

    Critics across the political spectrum have seized on the leaked remarks to condemn what they call Kallas’s selective application of international law. Kallas has been one of the most vocal advocates for harsh punitive measures against Russia for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, pushing for sweeping sanctions and unwavering diplomatic support for Kyiv. But when it comes to Israel, she has consistently framed the country’s actions as a legitimate exercise of its “right to self-defense,” even as Palestinians endure mass bombardment, a year-long total siege, mass displacement, and what Kallas herself privately acknowledges is an apartheid system of rule.

    Progressive members of the European Parliament have joined this criticism, arguing that the EU’s entire approach to the Gaza conflict is marked by hypocrisy when compared to its unified, forceful response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. MEPs have repeatedly demanded that Brussels adopt tougher sanctions on Israeli officials, suspend the long-standing EU-Israel Association Agreement, and end the political protection that the bloc has extended to Israel for decades.

    The leak of Kallas’s remarks also comes at a moment of intensifying internal power struggle over control of EU foreign policy. On June 11, the Financial Times reported that France and Germany are circulating proposals to restructure the bloc’s diplomatic architecture, a change that would significantly reduce Kallas’s authority and influence. Citing five senior EU officials briefed on the ongoing talks, the FT reported that the proposals would strip key powers from the European External Action Service (EEAS), the diplomatic body that supports the EU foreign policy chief.

    Any move to weaken Kallas and the EEAS would shift greater power over foreign policy to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the bloc’s national capitals. Von der Leyen has long sought to expand the commission’s role in setting EU foreign policy, and she is widely recognized as even more staunchly pro-Israel than Kallas.

    This report was originally based on independent reporting from Middle East Eye, which provides dedicated, in-depth coverage of the Middle East and North Africa region.

  • The world wants more high-protein products, but there’s not enough whey to go around

    The world wants more high-protein products, but there’s not enough whey to go around

    Across global consumer markets, demand for higher protein content in everyday food products has reached historic highs, but the international dairy sector is failing to keep up with the surge, triggering a crippling shortage and record-breaking price spikes that are rippling through the entire food supply chain.

  • New York Knicks win NBA championship for first time in over 50 years

    New York Knicks win NBA championship for first time in over 50 years

    After more than half a century of heartbreak and unfulfilled hope for New York Knicks fans across the globe, the historic franchise has finally captured its first National Basketball Association championship since 1973, sealing a tight 94-90 victory over the rising San Antonio Spurs in Game 5 of the 2026 NBA Finals held in San Antonio.

    Guard Jalen Brunson, the undisputed leader of the 2025-26 Knicks squad, delivered a legendary performance that earned him the Bill Russell NBA Finals Most Valuable Player Award, capping off a dominant postseason run with a standout showing in the title-clinching game. Photographs from the matchup capture intense on-court battles: Knicks center Mitchell Robinson going head-to-head with generational Spurs prospect Victor Wembanyama for loose balls and positioning, Brunson rising for a first-half shot over Spurs guard Stephon Castle, and a surprising celebrity appearance from Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, who took in the historic matchup from courtside in Texas.

    Back in New York City, thousands of ecstatic fans flooded iconic public spaces including Times Square, and packed organized watch parties outside Madison Square Garden, Radio City Music Hall and Wollman Rink, which were arranged in partnership between the city government and the Knicks organization. Supporters packed neighborhood sports bars within walking distance of the Garden, cheering every basket and defensive stop as the clock wound down on the Knicks’ historic win. Within minutes of the final buzzer, crowds poured into city streets to celebrate the long-awaited milestone that has united the entire five boroughs.

    In advance of the matchup, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani took to social media to urge celebrating fans to prioritize safety and look out for fellow attendees, reminding the public to make the night a reflection of New York’s best community values. His appeal for caution came on the heels of troubling isolated incidents of fan violence targeting Spurs supporters in New York in the days leading up to Game 5. Local media reports documented two separate attacks: one left a Spurs fan hospitalized, while a fast-food employee wearing a Spurs jersey was also assaulted by aggressive Knicks supporters. Both the Knicks and Spurs organizations, along with all active players from both teams, issued public statements condemning the unsportsmanlike violence and harassment ahead of the final game.

    The lead-up to the title decider also included a short-lived ticket controversy that sparked frustration among traveling New York fans. Early online notes from Ticketmaster sparked panic when it stated that any ticket purchases by fans living more than 150 miles from San Antonio’s AT&T Center would be automatically canceled and refunded without advance warning, leaving hundreds of traveling Knicks fans fearing they would be locked out of the championship-clinching game. New York Governor Kathy Hochul publicly called out the confusing policy on social media, writing: “Knicks fans finally get within one game of a championship and their reward is having their tickets canceled?” Ticketmaster quickly moved to correct the miscommunication, issuing a formal statement assuring fans that no valid tickets purchased through its platform would be canceled, easing concerns for traveling supporters.

    By the time the final buzzer sounded, all off-court controversies faded into the background, as New Yorkers turned their full attention to celebrating a win decades in the making. For a franchise that has endured decades of playoff disappointments, front-office chaos, and national mockery, the 2026 NBA championship marks the end of one of the longest title droughts in major North American professional sports.

  • Nagelsmann: Goalkeeper Manuel Neuer fit to start as Germany opens the World Cup vs Curaçao

    Nagelsmann: Goalkeeper Manuel Neuer fit to start as Germany opens the World Cup vs Curaçao

    HOUSTON — Ahead of Germany’s highly anticipated 2026 FIFA World Cup opening clash against debutant Curaçao this Sunday, head coach Julian Nagelsmann has confirmed that veteran goalkeeper Manuel Neuer has made a full recovery from the calf injury he sustained last month, and is fit to start the fixture. At 40 years old, Neuer is set to make history at this tournament: he will notch his fifth World Cup appearance, tying the all-time German record held by legendary former midfielder Lothar Matthäus. He is also the sole remaining player from Germany’s 2014 World Cup-winning squad still active on the national team.

    Neuer’s path to this tournament has been unusual. After retiring from international play, he was lured back to the national setup by Nagelsmann nearly two years after his last cap for Germany. Questions over his match fitness lingered after he picked up the left calf injury during Bayern Munich’s final Bundesliga match of the season in late May, forcing him to sit out the German Cup final against Stuttgart due to the muscular issue. But speaking on Saturday night on the eve of the opener, Nagelsmann brushed aside any remaining concerns over Neuer’s condition.

    “(He’s) definitely fit enough to start the game and he got better and better,” Nagelsmann told reporters. “He didn’t really have the rhythm, but now he found the rhythm. He played a lot, we trust him a lot and I think … in order to have a good World Cup, we need Manuel in top performance and I think he can bring that.”

    Neuer’s return to the national side has already proven to be an invaluable asset beyond his on-pitch contributions, particularly for the squad’s younger, less experienced players. As Germany looks to rebound from back-to-back early group-stage exits in 2018 and 2022, the veteran’s leadership has become a cornerstone of the team’s preparations. Bayern Munich teammate and 22-year-old rookie midfielder Aleksandar Pavlović, who is set to make his own World Cup debut this tournament, spoke glowably of Neuer’s influence.

    “Manuel is a world class player,” Pavlović said. “He always gives me tips. He helps me on the pitch and it is very important for me. I am very grateful for any tip he gives me and I’m trying to implement any tip he gives me.”

    Sunday’s opening fixture will also make World Cup history off the pitch, thanks to the stark contrast between the two sides’ dugouts. Four-time World Cup champion Germany enters the match as the overwhelming favorite against Curaçao, which is competing in its first ever World Cup as the smallest nation to ever qualify for the global tournament. While Curaçao enters the clash as clear underdogs, their head coach Dick Advocaat brings no shortage of elite tournament experience, having previously led the Netherlands at the 1994 World Cup and South Korea at the 2006 edition.

    At 78 years old, Advocaat will become the oldest head coach in World Cup history when he steps onto the touchline on Sunday. Opposite him, Germany’s 38-year-old Nagelsmann is the youngest head coach participating in this year’s tournament. The 40-year age gap between the two coaches is the largest ever recorded in a World Cup fixture. The two veteran and rookie coaches have nothing but praise for one another ahead of kickoff.

    “I think he’s a really cool coach,” Nagelsmann said of Advocaat. “I think it’s really cool and a great compliment for his work. I got to know him a few times and he’s always kind. As a young coach I always can learn from people like him.” When asked if he expected to still be coaching at 78, Nagelsmann laughed and responded, “I like my job, but I hope to do different things with my life at that age.”

    Advocaat returned the compliment, noting that Nagelsmann’s rise to the top job of a major national team at such a young age speaks for itself. “He must have something special and he has that otherwise he wouldn’t be the coach of the national team,” Advocaat said. “He’s an excellent coach.”

  • Scotland marks 28-year World Cup absence with 1-0 victory over Haiti in Group C

    Scotland marks 28-year World Cup absence with 1-0 victory over Haiti in Group C

    FOXBOROUGH, Mass. – In a historic World Cup Group C clash at Gillette Stadium on Saturday, Scotland claimed a long-awaited 1-0 victory over Haiti, courtesy of a deflected first-half goal from Aston Villa midfielder John McGinn that capped off a dramatic opening to the nation’s first World Cup tournament in 25 years.

    McGinn’s decisive strike arrived in the 28th minute, sparked by a close-range attempt from Scotland striker Che Adams that goalkeeper Johny Placide could only parry into open space inside the penalty area. Pouncing on the loose ball from 13 yards out, McGinn fired a low effort that ricocheted off a Haitian defender, wrong-footing Placide and bouncing into the back of the net. The goal broke a decades-long drought for Scotland, which had not notched a World Cup win since a 2-1 victory over Sweden at the 1990 tournament, and was making its first appearance at the global competition since 1998.

    The result was all the more sweeter for Scotland after Group C favorites Brazil and Morocco played to a 1-1 draw earlier the same day, leaving Steve Clarke’s side sitting atop the early group standings with three points from their opening fixture.

    Scotland nearly doubled their lead 11 minutes before McGinn’s goal, when captain Scott McTominay found space outside the box and unleashed a curling effort that clipped the top of the crossbar, bouncing just over the frame of the goal to deny the Manchester United star an opening goal.

    Haiti, which is only making its second World Cup appearance in history following their debut at the 1974 tournament in West Germany, pushed hard for an equalizer in the second half and came close to leveling the score twice. In the 74th minute, winger Ruben Providence delivered a pinpoint cross into the six-yard box for forward Wilson Isidor, but Isidor failed to make clean contact with the ball and the chance went begging. Ten minutes later, striker Frantzdy Pierrot got on the end of another cross to nod a header toward goal, but his effort drifted just wide of the left post, leaving Haiti still searching for its first ever World Cup point.

    The packed stadium was dominated by Scotland’s famously passionate fanbase, the Tartan Army, who turned the venue located 30 miles outside Boston into a sea of maroon, creating a raucous atmosphere from kickoff to final whistle.

    Looking ahead to the next round of group fixtures, Scotland will remain in Foxborough to face Morocco at Gillette Stadium next Friday, while Haiti will travel to Philadelphia to take on Brazil the same day.

  • Has Vinicius Jr brilliance just papered over the Brazilian cracks?

    Has Vinicius Jr brilliance just papered over the Brazilian cracks?

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup kicked off with a tense Group C opener at New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium, where five-time champions Brazil escaped a humiliating opening-match defeat thanks to a moment of individual magic from star forward Vinicius Jr, who forced a 1-1 draw against a dominant Morocco side.

    Heading into the tournament, Vinicius made his ambitions clear: he has not come to this World Cup to claim individual honors, but to lift Brazil back to the summit of global football. Just 90 minutes later, the Real Madrid winger proved he was willing to put in the work to back up those words, single-handedly rescuing his side when all looked lost.

    Trailing 1-0 from an early Ismael Saibari strike and outplayed for large portions of the first half, Brazil looked on course for their first opening World Cup defeat since 1934. That was until a well-placed pass from Bruno Guimaraes found Vinicius unmarked on the left edge of Morocco’s penalty area in the 62nd minute. Cutting inside onto his stronger right foot, the 25-year-old unleashed a thunderous strike that flew into the top corner of the net, leaving Morocco goalkeeper Yassine Bono with no chance of making a save. The strike, described by former England goalkeeper Joe Hart as a “lightning bolt” of quality, dragged Brazil back level and avoided an unwanted place in the history books.

    Despite the last-gasp equalizer, Brazil’s performance raised major questions about the squad’s depth and tactical balance, with analysts and former players unanimous in their criticism of the five-time champions’ ragged display. South American football expert Tim Vickery summed up the mood after the match, telling BBC Sport: “Ideally you want the team to make the stars, here you have a case of the star saving the team.”

    The underlying issues plaguing Brazil were clear for all to see. The current squad is heavily overloaded with attacking wingers, but critically short of depth in central midfield. Veteran 34-year-old Casemiro struggled to keep pace with Morocco’s dynamic midfield through the stifling New Jersey heat, and was substituted at half-time after failing to impose himself on the game. Defender Roger Ibanez also did not return for the second half as head coach Carlo Ancelotti, making his World Cup head coaching debut at the age of 67, scrambled to fix the team’s obvious shortcomings.

    Former Uruguay and Chelsea midfielder Gus Poyet said he was shocked by Brazil’s technical sloppiness, noting: “I was surprised how bad technically they were today. I don’t know if it was the pitch, maybe the pitch didn’t help but they were missing passes, simple passes that you would expect the Brazilian players to do well.”

    For long spells of the match, Brazil lacked the iconic swagger that has defined generations of Brazilian greats from Pele to Ronaldo, Ronaldinho to Zico. This indifferent form is not a new issue: Brazil narrowly qualified for the 2026 tournament after a disastrous qualifying campaign that saw them drop six defeats from 18 matches, finishing fifth in the South American standings and only securing their place in the final draw at the last minute. Ancelotti, the first foreign head coach to lead Brazil at a World Cup, was brought in specifically to steady the ship after that rocky qualifying run, and admitted after Friday’s draw that his side had fallen short of expectations.

    In his post-match press conference, the five-time Champions League-winning coach said: “I am sorry we didn’t play as well as we hoped. It wasn’t a bad result but we will keep picking up. We have to do better, that’s very clear. We have to have a more balanced team and we have to be more aggressive. I am not disappointed but I am not satisfied either. Not everything goes perfect and we have to accept criticism.”

    Vickery, however, noted that Brazil’s ability to snatch a draw despite a poor performance is exactly what makes them such a dangerous opponent at major tournaments: “How many teams can play that badly and still be in the game? It’s the individuality.”

    History also offers Brazil fans a glimmer of hope, with experts pointing out that this expanded 48-team World Cup is a marathon, not a sprint. Four years ago in Qatar, Argentina suffered a shocking opening defeat to Saudi Arabia, before going on to lift the trophy, a example of how slow starts do not rule out ultimate success.

    All eyes will remain on Vinicius, who entered this tournament already carrying the weight of expectation to become the next great Brazilian superstar. The equalizer against Morocco marked his 10th international goal for Brazil, with three of those strikes coming on American soil. Doubts have lingered ever since Brazil’s penalty shootout exit to Croatia in the 2022 World Cup quarter-finals, but the Real Madrid forward says he is ready to step into the leading role the national team needs.

    Speaking before the match, Vinicius said: “I feel great freedom and sincere trust from Ancelotti. He is sure I can do for the national team what I do for Real Madrid. I want to try to write the history of the country and the national team. We must do everything to win.”

    Brazil next face Haiti in Philadelphia on 19 June, before concluding their group stage campaign against Scotland in Miami on 24 June. They are still heavily favored to progress to the knockout stage, but Friday’s draw has left major questions unanswered. Brazil have not won the World Cup since 2002, marking a 24-year title drought for the most successful nation in World Cup history. A failure to go all the way this tournament will spark intense scrutiny over the future direction of Brazilian football, but for now, Vinicius’s moment of magic has kept their dream of a sixth title alive.

  • Trump and other G7 leaders are meeting without China. Is that a mistake?

    Trump and other G7 leaders are meeting without China. Is that a mistake?

    When the world’s leading wealthy democracies gathered for their first ever summit in a French countryside chateau in 1975, China was never in the room. That original gathering of six major powers, which would become the annual Group of 7 a year later after Canada joined, was created to coordinate policy for a slumping global economy — and Beijing’s absence was never controversial.

    At the time, China was mired in domestic political upheaval, decades away from its transformation into a global economic powerhouse. The idea of Mao Zedong, China’s revolutionary leader, joining U.S. President Gerald Ford and other Western heads of state for policy talks was unthinkable: Beijing had provided extensive military support to Ho Chi Minh’s communist forces in Vietnam, which ultimately defeated both U.S. and French military campaigns in the region. A seat at the 1975 Rambouillet summit would have never been on the table.

    Decades later, as then-U.S. President Donald Trump and other G7 leaders convened for their summit in the French Alpine town of Evian-les-Bains, that historic exclusion has started to look increasingly out of step with global reality. Today, China holds enormous influence over global economic stability and international affairs, prompting a pressing question that hangs over every G7 gathering: Does the bloc make any sense without China at the table?

    By any economic metric, China would qualify for membership without question. Following decades of rapid expansion after Mao’s death in 1976, China’s economy now outpaces every G7 member except the United States — it is larger than the economies of Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Canada combined. By that measure, a G7 summit without China is analogous to organizing a men’s soccer World Cup and excluding five-time champion Brazil, analysts note.

    John Kirton, a University of Toronto scholar who specializes in G7 research, summed up China’s transformation: “From being only a tiny, benign panda bear in 1975, China has become a great global dragon.” He added that many observers agree the G7 and the broader global community would benefit from Chinese membership, with a plausible answer to the question of inclusion being “Yes.”

    Yet a fundamental barrier stands in the way: the G7’s long-standing unwritten rule that membership is limited to functioning democracies. In their 1975 founding declaration at Rambouillet, the original leaders explicitly stated the bloc was built for nations “each responsible for the government of an open, democratic society, dedicated to individual liberty and social advancement.”

    China would never have met that threshold during Mao’s rule, when tens of millions died from famine and political upheaval tied to the Chinese Communist Party’s revolutionary campaigns. Under current President Xi Jinping, it still does not qualify: multiple independent global rankings, including Freedom House’s annual Freedom in the World report, Reporters Without Borders’ World Press Freedom Index and the Fraser Institute’s economic freedom ranking, all place China far behind G7 members when it comes to civil liberties and political openness.

    Even without a seat at the table, China is set to be the most consequential unspoken topic at the G7 summit. Beijing’s global clout touches nearly every policy area the bloc addresses, from trade to climate to national security. China posted a record annual trade surplus of nearly $1.2 trillion in 2025, maintaining a massive export imbalance that has long been a source of friction with other major industrialized economies. It controls a dominant share of the global supply of critical rare minerals required for green energy and advanced technology, its rapid military and tech advancement has sparked widespread anxiety among Western rivals, and it remains the world’s top emitter of greenhouse gases driving climate change.

    That makes China the unavoidable “elephant in the room” for the three-day Evian summit. As summit host, French President Emmanuel Macron has specifically set aside time for leaders to discuss rebalancing trade relations with China, amid growing fears that a surge in Chinese exports — particularly of electric vehicles — could harm domestic manufacturing sectors across G7 nations.

    While relations between Trump and other G7 leaders had been strained in the lead-up to the summit over disagreements on Iran policy and other contentious issues, China is widely seen as a unifying point for the bloc, according to Cédric Dupont, an international politics specialist at the Geneva Graduate Institute. “They agree on the same thing, you know: China is a problem,” Dupont explained.

    For its part, Beijing has watched G7 developments with open caution. Historically, the Chinese government has criticized the bloc as an outdated Cold War-era institution designed to advance Western ideological interests in a divided world. But in a statement provided to the Associated Press ahead of the Evian summit, China’s Foreign Ministry struck a more measured tone, saying “the G7 should serve as a catalyst for solidarity and cooperation rather than an amplifier of division and confrontation.”

    Beijing-based analyst Wang Zichen noted that China’s wariness stems from the bloc’s inherent alignment with U.S.-led Western power. “Beijing is wary of the G7 because it sees the group as structurally aligned with U.S.-led Western power, and increasingly as a venue where China is discussed as a challenge or threat,” Wang said. Even so, China cannot dismiss the G7’s influence: “China recognizes that the G7 still represents a very significant concentration of economic, technological, military and financial power,” he added.

    Beyond the democracy requirement, analysts argue that admitting China would irrevocably fracture the G7’s internal cohesion. Beijing’s authoritarian political system, core national interests and policy positions on flashpoints including Russia’s war in Ukraine and Iran’s nuclear program are fundamentally misaligned with those of Western G7 democracies. Even more, analysts warn Chinese membership could split long-standing alliances within the bloc, as individual nations could be tempted to strike separate side deals with Beijing to secure favorable terms on trade, critical minerals, technology and other key issues.

    “China inside would indeed be a Trojan horse,” Kirton said. “With a Chinese leader at the table, individual members might be tempted to break G7 ranks to secure special favors from him on the economic, critical minerals, digital technology and other issues they address.”

    Chris Alden, an international relations expert at the London School of Economics and Political Science, echoed that assessment, saying adding China “would make it very difficult for it [the G7] to function.”

    The bad experience of Russia’s brief membership also serves as a major warning for G7 leaders. The bloc’s last expansion, which added Russia as a full member in 1998, ended in acrimony: the G7 froze Russia out after Vladimir Putin seized Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, a move that foreshadowed Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. While Trump argued last year that excluding Russia was “a very big mistake,” the experience convinced most other G7 leaders that they should never again allow a non-democratic power to join their fully democratic bloc.

    Associated Press writers Ken Moritsugu and E. Eduardo Castillo in Beijing and Jamey Keaten in Geneva contributed reporting to this article.

  • Trump says Iran deal set for Sunday, but Tehran has yet to confirm

    Trump says Iran deal set for Sunday, but Tehran has yet to confirm

    A major diplomatic development over the end of the US-Israeli conflict with Iran has erupted into conflicting timelines this weekend, after former US President Donald Trump announced that a long-negotiated peace agreement would be signed Sunday to reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. The waterway, one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for global oil trade, has been closed throughout the recent escalation that roiled regional security and sent shockwaves through global energy markets.

    In a post shared to his Truth Social platform Saturday, Trump confirmed the deal’s purported timeline, stating that “The Deal is scheduled to get signed tomorrow, and immediately after it is signed, the Hormuz Strait is OPEN TO ALL.” Alongside the framework for ending hostilities, Trump outlined a key nuclear provision: the United States will take control of Iran’s existing stockpile of enriched uranium and permanently destroy the material. He detailed that once the region stabilizes, US B-2 stealth bombers will be deployed to extract and eliminate the nuclear material stored deep beneath fortified granite mountain sites, with downblending and disposal completed either in Iran or on US territory. Closing his statement, Trump extended an olive branch, saying “We look forward to working with Iran, and the entire Middle East, long into the future.” He also issued a veiled warning to Tehran over full implementation of the terms, noting “Hopefully, this process will all work out quickly, easily, and smoothly. If it doesn’t, we have the ultimate alternative, hopefully never to be used again!”

    Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif echoed optimism around the negotiations, announcing Saturday that Islamabad is prepared to complete an electronic signing of the agreement within 24 hours, with follow-up technical negotiations scheduled to kick off next week. “We are closer to a peace deal than ever before … We are confident that this historic peace deal will form a strong foundation for lasting peace,” Sharif wrote on his official social media channels.

    Despite the upbeat announcements from Washington and Islamabad, Iranian officials have pushed back directly on the Sunday signing timeline. Speaking to Iranian state media Saturday morning, foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei stressed that the memorandum of understanding would not be signed the following day, urging caution over premature timeline announcements. “We will have to wait and see about the exact date of the signing of the memorandum of understanding, although it will not be tomorrow,” Baghaei was quoted as saying. “The possibility of this happening in the coming days cannot be ruled out.”

    The conflicting statements come following nearly a week of intense armed conflict between Iran, Israel and the United States, the most severe escalation of tensions between the three parties since a ceasefire was reached in April. Just two days prior, on Thursday, Trump ramped up pressure on Iran by threatening to seize the country’s Kharg Island oil export terminal and launch a new round of military strikes. Within hours, he announced a sudden diplomatic breakthrough, claiming that a draft agreement had already been “approved” by “the highest level of Iranian leadership.”

  • Nigerian author accuses hospital of stalling review into her son’s death

    Nigerian author accuses hospital of stalling review into her son’s death

    One of the world’s most decorated contemporary authors, Nigerian writer Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, has gone public with searing accusations against a private Lagos hospital, claiming the facility has actively obstructed a mandatory coronial inquiry into the January death of her 21-month-old son, Nkanu.

    Nkanu, one half of a pair of twin boys born to Adichie via surrogacy in 2024, died on January 7 at Euracare Hospital, just days after Adichie, who normally resides in the United States, had traveled to Nigeria for the 2023 Christmas holiday. The toddler had first been admitted to Atlantis Hospital, another Lagos facility, for what clinicians classified as a worsening but still mild illness. Medical teams had arranged to transfer Nkanu to the United States for specialized care at Baltimore’s world-renowned Johns Hopkins Hospital, and he was referred to Euracare solely to complete pre-transfer diagnostic checks, including an MRI and a lumbar puncture, also called a spinal tap. He died shortly after completing these procedures at Euracare.

    In a dramatic break from her silence since the tragedy, Adichie published an open letter she sent to Euracare’s director back in April across her social media channels recently, laying bare her allegations and her grief. The coronial inquest into Nkanu’s death was scheduled to launch in April, but Adichie claims Euracare has spent months stalling, obscuring key details, and deliberately muddying the process of investigation. Most recently, the hospital filed a request with Nigeria’s Federal High Court to formally block the public inquiry entirely.

    Adichie and her legal team have levied formal claims of medical negligence against Euracare. They allege that clinical staff at the hospital denied Nkanu sufficient oxygen and administered excessive doses of sedation, a combination that triggered the cardiac arrest that killed the toddler. Adichie also called out the hospital’s official cause of death listed on Nkanu’s death certificate — bacterial meningitis — saying there is no verifiable medical evidence to support that diagnosis. She further accuses the facility of turning over incomplete and inaccurately altered medical records, a practice she described as strikingly unprofessional for a private tertiary hospital.

    In her public post accompanying the letter, Adichie opened up about the personal toll of the prolonged fight for answers. “The ultimate and utter loneliness of grief is that only you can know the true depth of your despair,” she wrote. “I long for, at least, peace to mourn, but Euracare Hospital has robbed me even of that.” She added, “If Euracare cares about the truth, then why create delays and distractions and now, finally, try to stop an inquest?”

    Euracare has pushed back against all allegations of wrongdoing. The facility has issued a statement offering its deepest sympathies to Adichie and her family over the loss of Nkanu, but maintains that all clinical care provided to the toddler aligned with global medical standards. The BBC has reached out to Euracare for additional comment in response to Adichie’s recent public allegations, and has not yet received a response.

    A preliminary investigation conducted by a panel convened by Nigeria’s Medical and Dental Council, the nation’s top regulatory body for medical practitioners and facilities, previously found evidence supporting a plausible claim of medical negligence against Euracare. Adichie’s legal team has submitted all evidence of the alleged negligence and obstruction to the Federal High Court as part of their response to the hospital’s motion to block the inquest. The court has not yet issued a ruling on the hospital’s request.

    Adichie, whose decades-long career has earned her global acclaim, is best known for award-winning works including *Half of a Yellow Sun* (2006) and *Americanah* (2013). Beyond her literary work, she has regularly taken part in high-profile global public events, recently hosting discussions with leading global figures including former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and former German Chancellor Angela Merkel.