作者: admin

  • AFL 2026: Western Bulldogs will ‘tread carefully’ with Tim English

    AFL 2026: Western Bulldogs will ‘tread carefully’ with Tim English

    The Australian Football League’s Western Bulldogs are moving deliberately and cautiously with star ruckman Tim English’s return to competitive play, after a fresh head knock reignited long-standing concerns over the athlete’s repeated concussion history.

    English’s latest injury occurred during last weekend’s victory over Port Adelaide, when he collided in a training drill with teammate Matthew Kennedy. Speaking to reporters on Thursday morning, Bulldogs head coach Luke Beveridge emphasized that the club would prioritize the athlete’s long-term health over a rapid comeback, stressing that no timeline for his return has been finalized.

    “We haven’t got an update for you today, we’ll wait and see how he goes over the next week and what his availability will be,” Beveridge told reporters. “I think because of his history — he’s been out of action at different times and spent a whole pre-season a couple of years ago non-contact — we’ll tread carefully.”

    English’s history of head injuries dates back to 2021 and 2022, when he sustained multiple concussions that forced him to sit out all contact drills during the 2024 pre-season to prioritize recovery. Without their starting ruckman, the Bulldogs have been forced to throw two inexperienced young tall players, Lachie Smith and Louis Emmett, into the rotation earlier than club officials had planned.

    Beveridge acknowledged that the club’s recruiting team is actively exploring the option of adding a supplementary ruckman via the upcoming mid-season draft, to ease the pressure on the club’s underprepared young talent. “Obviously, Lachie Smith has played a bit recently and dipped his toe in the water,” Beveridge said. “Louis Emmett has played some minutes there as a young player who is probably not ready for the ruck position, definitely not ready to be frank, but he’s a competitor and he’s done his best for us. It’s something that we’re thinking about, but is there a player available? And our recruiters are working through that at the moment.”

    The Bulldogs are also taking a measured approach to the return of veteran midfielder Tom Liberatore, who has not seen game action since Round 6. While Liberatore also has a recent concussion, Beveridge noted that the primary barrier to his comeback is a knee injury, with the head injury listed as a secondary concern.

    “He’ll be a while, Tom … he’s a fair way away with that knee,” Beveridge said. “Concussion I think is secondary at the moment, for me, we’re not really talking about it, we’re talking about the knee. He’ll have some tests along the way around the concussion, but I think it’s mainly just about the knee at the moment.”

  • Chris Wood to lead New Zealand at the World Cup after an injury-troubled Premier League campaign

    Chris Wood to lead New Zealand at the World Cup after an injury-troubled Premier League campaign

    New Zealand Football has finalized its 26-player squad for the upcoming FIFA Men’s World Cup, headlined by injured Nottingham Forest striker Chris Wood, who will captain the nation’s first World Cup side in 14 years. The announcement, made Thursday by head coach Darren Bazeley in Auckland, marks a milestone for New Zealand men’s football, with two players set to break new ground for the country on soccer’s biggest global stage.

    Alongside Wood, 36-year-old defender Tommy Smith earned a surprise recall, receiving his first All Whites call-up since late 2024 despite plying his trade in England’s fifth-tier National League. Both Wood and Smith featured in New Zealand’s 2010 World Cup squad in South Africa, making them the first New Zealand men ever to qualify for two World Cup tournaments. As team captain, Wood follows in the footsteps of New Zealand World Cup skippers Steve Sumner (1982 Spain) and Ryan Nelsen (2010), carrying the nation’s hopes of a historic first knockout stage berth.
    Bazeley acknowledged that cutting the preliminary pool down to 26 roster spots was one of the hardest challenges of his preparation, noting that 40 different players featured for the All Whites across 10 international matches over the previous 15 months, with more than 50 players tracked for selection in the years leading up to the tournament.

    “Naming a World Cup squad is a true privilege — the World Cup is the pinnacle of our sport, and it’s the ultimate dream for every player who steps onto the pitch,” Bazeley said in his announcement address. “We’ve spent years building toward this moment, evaluating every contender who put themselves forward for a spot.”
    The head coach added that his technical staff settled on a group they believe gives New Zealand the best possible chance to achieve an unprecedented result: advancing out of the group stage. Ranked 85th in the FIFA rankings, New Zealand was drawn into Group G alongside three higher-ranked opponents: No. 9 Belgium, No. 20 Iran and No. 29 Egypt. The All Whites have never advanced past the group stage in their two prior World Cup appearances, a fact Bazeley says his side is hungry to change.
    “This process is never easy, and we do not take the responsibility of selecting this squad lightly,” he said. “But I am confident we have put together the strongest possible group to compete against Iran, Egypt, Belgium and whoever comes next. Now the debate is over — it’s time to head to the tournament and seize this chance to make history for New Zealand.”
    Wood, who has missed extensive club action this season with injury, delivered a pre-recorded address to the squad announcement crowd from his base in England, saying he is eager to join his teammates and compete on the world stage.
    “I can’t wait to share this moment with all of you and make history together,” Wood said. “I hope we can make the entire country proud and show the world what New Zealand football is capable of.”
    The squad blends veteran experience with exciting young emerging talent, a balance that is on clear display across the roster. At the opposite end of the experience spectrum from 36-year-old Smith, 23-year-old midfielder Lachlan Bayliss earned a spot just two months after making his international debut. Bayliss enjoyed a breakout 2023-24 season with the Newcastle Jets in Australia’s A-League, and qualifies for New Zealand through his Kiwi father despite being born and raised in Australia.
    Other key selections include Auckland FC goalkeeper Michael Woud, who won a tight battle for the third goalkeeper spot behind starters Alex Paulsen and Max Crocombe. Up front, Wood will be backed by Australia-based veteran Kosta Barbarouses, Port Vale forward Ben Waine and Silkeborg winger Callum McCowatt. On the back line, Smith joins a deep group of central defender options including Michael Boxall, Tyler Bindon, Nando Pijnaker and Finn Surman.
    The full 26-player New Zealand World Cup squad is as follows:
    Goalkeepers: Max Crocombe, Alex Paulsen, Michael Woud
    Defenders: Tyler Bindon, Michael Boxall, Liberato Cacace, Francis de Vries, Callan Elliot, Tim Payne, Nando Pijnaker, Tommy Smith, Finn Surman
    Midfielders: Lachlan Bayliss, Joe Bell, Matt Garbett, Ben Old, Alex Rufer, Sarpreet Singh, Marko Stamenic, Ryan Thomas
    Forwards: Kosta Barbarouses, Eli Just, Callum McCowatt, Jesse Randall, Ben Waine, Chris Wood

  • France blames stomach bug for new cruise outbreak, lifts lockdown

    France blames stomach bug for new cruise outbreak, lifts lockdown

    In the wake of a sudden illness outbreak aboard a British cruise ship anchored off western France, local authorities have cleared asymptomatic passengers to disembark, after confirming that a common gastrointestinal virus — not the internationally concerning hantavirus linked to a recent fatal outbreak on another vessel — is the cause of the illness. The incident, which sparked initial public alarm following the death of a 92-year-old British passenger, has been brought under control through targeted precautionary measures.

    The Ambition, operated by UK-based Ambassador Cruise Line, carrying 1,233 passengers (the vast majority from Britain and Ireland) and 514 crew members, first reported a spike in gastrointestinal symptoms among passengers when it docked in Brest, Brittany, on Monday. The 92-year-old passenger died before the ship reached the Brittany port, and initial reports of his death alongside dozens of sick passengers triggered swift action: French officials ordered a full temporary lockdown of the vessel, which later sailed to its scheduled stop in Bordeaux, where it remained anchored while health officials conducted testing.

    Local government and regional health authorities confirmed in an official statement Wednesday that testing ruled out any connection to the hantavirus outbreak that killed three people on the Dutch-flagged MV Hondius, an incident that had already stoked global public health anxiety. They confirmed the outbreak on the Ambition is a viral gastrointestinal infection, with no severe cases recorded among those affected. Officials also clarified that the 92-year-old passenger’s death was caused by a heart attack, and no link has been found between his death and the gastroenteritis outbreak. Per international conventions, the man’s body remains on the vessel pending next steps.

    French authorities noted that the full lockdown was implemented out of an abundance of caution, specifically to prevent unnecessary public panic amid ongoing attention to the Hondius hantavirus incident. As of Wednesday, asymptomatic passengers were permitted to leave the ship, while those showing symptoms of the virus remain in isolation aboard the vessel. The cruise line confirmed that cases of illness began rising after new passengers boarded in Liverpool, UK, on Saturday, during the ship’s scheduled itinerary.

    The Ambition departed the Shetland Islands, Scotland, on May 6, made stops in Belfast and Liverpool before arriving in Bordeaux, and was originally scheduled to sail from Bordeaux to Spain before returning to Liverpool on May 22. Passengers aboard the ship described a calm atmosphere despite the temporary lockdown, with many continuing routine activities. “We are onboard with extra sanitation guidelines in place. It is not as bad as it was during Covid. People just going about as normal,” Seos Guilidhe, a 52-year-old passenger from Belfast, told AFP via Facebook while playing bingo aboard the ship Wednesday, before confirming that restrictions had been lifted and asymptomatic passengers were allowed to disembark. For infected passengers, however, the experience has been far less comfortable: “Two of us in one cabin with the bug is a challenge,” one infected passenger wrote on social media.

  • Iran holds World Cup send-off for national football team

    Iran holds World Cup send-off for national football team

    On Wednesday, Iran hosted a high-stakes, politically infused public send-off ceremony for its men’s national football team ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the historic tournament co-hosted by the United States, Mexico and Canada. Footage broadcast on Iranian state television showed thousands of fans packing Enghelab Square in central Tehran, where players clad in the national team’s signature red and black tracksuits were introduced to the cheering crowd from a central stage.

    Both head coach Amir Ghalenoei and Iranian Football Federation president Mehdi Taj joined the squad for the celebratory but tense event. In his remarks to attendees, Taj framed the national team’s participation in the upcoming tournament through a sharply political lens, noting that the squad would represent not just the Iranian people, but also the country’s fighters and current Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. “Our national team is the national football team of wartime,” Taj stated, adding that the side would serve as a “pillar of authority and resistance” on the global stage.

    Attendees waved Iranian flags and sang patriotic chants throughout the ceremony, with many holding up placards and portraits of the late former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who was killed in recent U.S.-Israeli strikes that sparked an ongoing regional war across the Middle East. One prominent placard carried a direct message to the squad, reading: “For the blood of the martyrs, sing the national anthem with firmness and without hesitation.”

    Iran has been drawn into Group G for the tournament’s group stage, where it will face off against New Zealand, Belgium and Egypt. As a World Cup participating nation, Iran will base its training and operations out of Tucson, Arizona for the duration of the tournament, and will kick off its 2026 campaign against New Zealand on June 15 in Los Angeles.

  • Berlin launches scheme to swap trash for treats

    Berlin launches scheme to swap trash for treats

    Berlin has kicked off an innovative new pilot program that turns environmentally conscious actions into tangible perks for both residents and visitors, drawing inspiration from a successful trial launched earlier this year in Copenhagen. Dubbed BerlinPay, the initiative centers on encouraging sustainable behavior across the German capital, with a particular focus on cleaning up the iconic Spree River that cuts through the heart of the city and boosting sustainable water tourism. The pilot program will run through June 14, and invites participants to earn rewards by completing eco-friendly activities beyond litter collection, from planting native flowers and watering urban greenery to switching from car trips to cycling. The city’s extensive network of summer-popular lakes and waterways, a major draw for tourists each year, also stands to benefit from the scheme’s environmental goals. Deputy mayor Franziska Giffey noted that Berlin’s water tourism sector is currently experiencing strong growth and is a key contributor to the local economy, but the increasing popularity of these waterways also comes with measurable environmental costs. Speaking at Wednesday’s launch press conference, VisitBerlin CEO Sabine Wendt explained that the project aims to encourage both Berlin residents and out-of-town guests to engage with the city in a more thoughtful, environmentally aware way. To join the initiative, participants register for free through the official VisitBerlin platform, where they can choose from more than 5,000 available activity slots. Around 40 partner organizations including local businesses, cultural associations, and public museums have signed on to offer rewards for completed actions, ranging from discounted meals at local restaurants and free canoe tours on the Spree to complimentary entry to Berlin’s world-famous museum collections. The core mission of the program extends far beyond cleaning up local waterways: organizers hope to foster long-term environmental awareness among both residents and the millions of tourists who visit Berlin each year. BerlinPay is directly modeled after Copenhagen’s CopenPay program, which launched in 2024 and saw impressive early results: more than 75,000 tourists participated in the initiative’s first month, bike rentals across the city jumped 29%, and volunteers collected multiple tons of improperly discarded litter. If the Berlin pilot delivers similar positive outcomes, Giffey confirmed the city plans to make BerlinPay an annual recurring event for the capital.

  • ​‘Our only crime is being Shia’: Pakistani workers say UAE surveillance led to deportations

    ​‘Our only crime is being Shia’: Pakistani workers say UAE surveillance led to deportations

    In early spring, the first wave of involuntary returns of Pakistani laborers from the United Arab Emirates slipped quietly across border checkpoints and into rural communities across Pakistan, with little fanfare and no advance warning. Men arrived back to their hometowns empty-handed, catching their families completely off guard. Within weeks, however, similar cases began to emerge from every corner of the country, forming a pattern that has sparked outrage and sectarian concern across South Asia and the Gulf.

    According to interviews with multiple Shia community leaders conducted by Middle East Eye, thousands of Pakistani workers – the vast majority of whom identify as Shia Muslim and had lived and worked in the UAE for decades – have been expelled from the Gulf state since mid-April in a campaign shrouded in official secrecy. None of the deportees interviewed received formal charges, advanced explanation, or access to legal appeal before being detained and placed on repatriation flights. For many of the men affected, the message is clear: their religious identity is the only explanation for their expulsion.

    “They did not tell us any reason,” explained Hussain Turi, a 45-year-old former taxi driver whose home district of Khurram, located along Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan, has received nearly 200 deported residents from the UAE in just a few months. “But we understood. Our only crime is being Shia.”

    Deportees describe a sudden, opaque process that leaves no room for pushback or clarification. Workers report being summoned to local police stations with no stated reason, held for days in overcrowded detention facilities and jails, and flown directly to Pakistan without ever being permitted to consult a lawyer, hear a formal accusation, or challenge their expulsion. Many had spent decades working low-wage jobs in construction, transportation, and service roles across the UAE, sending consistent remittances that supported entire extended families back in Pakistan.

    Similar patterns of targeted deportation of Pakistani Shia workers have been reported in Qatar earlier this year, drawing broader international attention to the issue after accounts spread across social media and international news outlets. Indian Shia organizations, including the All India Shia Personal Law Board, have also raised alarms over rising detentions and mistreatment of Indian Shia workers in multiple Gulf states, most notably the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

    Pakistan’s federal government has pushed back hard against these claims, dismissing all reporting of sect-based targeting as bad-faith propaganda. In a May 8 statement, the country’s interior ministry said that “all such reporting is malafide and part of vicious propaganda by vested interests,” adding that no country or sect-specific deportation campaign is underway, including in the UAE.

    But despite official denials, on-the-ground interviews with community leaders, deportees, and activists across multiple Pakistani provinces confirm that Shia workers have been disproportionately affected by the recent wave of expulsions. Prominent Shia cleric Allama Amin Shaheedi estimates that as many as 15,000 Pakistani Shia have either been deported or denied re-entry to the UAE in recent months, though the lack of official data and the secrecy surrounding the campaign make independent verification of the total scale impossible.

    Many deportees have requested anonymity or only agreed to speak on condition of being identified by their surname, fearing that public criticism will permanently bar them from returning to the Gulf to recover left-behind savings, businesses, vehicles, or unpaid wages. Even so, accounts collected across Pakistan are nearly identical in their description of how detentions and expulsions unfolded.

    “They approached me directly and asked for my ID. They already knew exactly who I was,” said Qaisar, a Shia man deported to Pakistan’s Chakwal District in Punjab, who described being intercepted by security officials at Dubai’s flagship Dubai Mall after being flagged via closed-circuit surveillance.

    Multiple deportees and community advocates say the campaign is rooted in a years-long systematic surveillance and profiling program targeted explicitly at Shia religious identity. The most commonly cited practice is mandatory biometric scanning of Emirates ID cards for all worshippers entering imambargahs – Shia congregation halls – a security requirement that interviewees say is almost never enforced at Sunni mosques across the UAE.

    Deportees and advocates argue that biometric data, identity records, and attendance logs collected at Shia religious sites over years have been used by UAE security agencies to map Shia religious networks and flag individuals for deportation. While no independent official evidence has confirmed this data collection practice, first-hand accounts consistently point to a coordinated system of religious tracking.

    “At the imambargahs, they ask us to scan our Emirates ID cards before entering,” said Abbas, a former employee of an architectural firm in Dubai who was deported to Lahore in late April. “People became afraid of attending because they believed their names were being recorded.”

    The dragnet has even accidentally swept up non-Shia workers who associated with Shia communities. Raziq, a Sunni laborer from Sargodha in Punjab, told MEE he was deported after being misidentified as Shia, because he regularly visited a local imambargah to access free meals he could not otherwise afford. “Despite being Sunni, I was deported for being Shia,” he said.

    Community members also allege that in recent years, UAE visa and employment permit officials have increasingly delayed, rejected, or suspended applications from Pakistanis who carry surnames traditionally associated with Shia communities, including Zaidi, Askari, Jafri, Hussain, Hasan, Turi, and Bangash. Applicants from Pakistani districts with large Shia populations, such as Khurram, Kohat, Quetta, Hunza, and Skardu, also report facing heightened, unexplained scrutiny during immigration and employment screening. Some applicants report being subjected to months-long unexplained “security checks,” while others say employers now quietly avoid hiring workers from perceived Shia backgrounds to avoid drawing scrutiny from security officials. MEE was unable to independently verify the full scale of these alleged restrictions, and UAE authorities have not issued any public comment on claims of surname-based profiling.

    Many deportees also say UAE security officials confiscated their bank cards, cash, and mobile phones before they were deported, leaving them stranded upon arrival in Pakistan with no access to their life savings or personal belongings. Others report being denied the opportunity to contact their employers, collect unpaid months of wages, or retrieve personal property before being forced onto repatriation flights.

    “Nobody accused us of a crime. Nobody showed us evidence,” said Haider Kazmi, an IT professional who had lived and worked in Dubai for a decade before his expulsion. “They looked at our faith and decided we no longer belonged there.” Kazmi added that the abrupt, unaccountable process left many deportees feeling deeply humiliated and dehumanized. “It was painful,” he said. “But as Shias, we are taught that hardship and persecution have always been part of our history.”

    Since the 2020 Abraham Accords that normalized relations between the UAE and Israel, Shia expatriates across the Gulf report a sharp deterioration in the security environment for public Shia religious practice. While Ashura commemorations and private majalis (religious council gatherings) are still permitted in some private locations, public Shia mourning rituals and religious events have come under steadily increasing surveillance, with worshippers facing detention and deportation. Human Rights Watch documented a clear rise in restrictions on Shia religious expression in the UAE as early as late 2020.

    Security analysts and community leaders agree that the recent wave of deportations is directly tied to escalating regional geopolitical tensions reshaping the Gulf, specifically the sharpened confrontation between Iran, the United States, and Israel that began on February 28. Gulf states including the UAE and Saudi Arabia have long viewed Shia communities and religious networks through the lens of potential Iranian influence, a perspective that hardened after the 1979 Iranian Revolution and intensified following the 2011 Arab uprisings. During periods of heightened regional conflict, these suspicions translate into increased scrutiny of Shia expatriate communities from Pakistan, Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

    At the center of Gulf security concerns is the doctrine of Wilayat al-Faqih, or “Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist,” the ideological foundation of the Islamic Republic of Iran developed by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini after the 1979 revolution. The doctrine grants Iran’s supreme leader sweeping religious and political authority, which adherents recognize as extending beyond Iran’s borders to Shia communities globally. While many Shia Muslims and senior Shia clerics around the world reject this claim of transnational authority, Gulf security establishments argue that it fosters divided loyalties that threaten the legitimacy of ruling monarchies.

    These longstanding anxieties were amplified on April 20, when the UAE’s State Security Department announced it had dismantled a clandestine network allegedly tied to Iran, claiming the investigation uncovered links to Wilayat al-Faqih ideology, reinforcing existing fears of Iranian influence among expatriate Shia communities. Regional tensions deteriorated even further after the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a joint US-Israeli strike on Tehran on February 28, an event that sparked widespread unrest across Muslim-majority nations, including violent Shia-led protests in Pakistan that left more than 35 people dead. The subsequent succession of Khamenei’s son Mojtaba Khamenei as Iran’s new supreme leader has deepened Gulf fears that Iran’s ideological project will continue unchanged.

    For Shia communities across the Gulf, the convergence of the Abraham Accords and the post-February war on Iran has supercharged official paranoia about perceived Shia loyalties, leaving tens of thousands of working-class Pakistanis displaced, stripped of their livelihoods, and with little legal recourse to reclaim their lives in the Gulf.

  • Trump’s meeting with Xi comes with much fanfare in China, but major breakthroughs may be elusive

    Trump’s meeting with Xi comes with much fanfare in China, but major breakthroughs may be elusive

    BEIJING – When former U.S. President Donald Trump launched the most intensive segment of his official visit to China on Thursday, diplomatic observers and policymakers on both sides entered the diplomatic summit braced for more symbolic spectacle than substantive progress. Key sticking points from bilateral trade to U.S. policy toward Taiwan and the ongoing conflict in Iran have created low expectations for landmark agreements, even as the visit unfolds against a backdrop of carefully curated ceremonial pageantry.

    Trump’s arrival in the Chinese capital Wednesday evening opened with an elaborate formal welcome ceremony. His motorcade processed down central Beijing thoroughfares lined with alternating American and Chinese national flags, past towering skyscrapers illuminated with large red Chinese characters reading “Beijing Welcome.” After the procession, the U.S. president traveled to his downtown accommodation with no public engagements scheduled for the rest of the evening.

    On Thursday, Chinese leader Xi Jinping is scheduled to meet Trump for an official welcoming ceremony at the Great Hall of the People, China’s top legislative venue located on the western edge of Tiananmen Square, which also hosts major state and cultural events. Following the opening ceremony, the two leaders will hold a one-on-one bilateral working meeting, after which Trump will tour the Temple of Heaven, a 15th-century imperial religious complex once used by Ming and Qing dynasty emperors to perform annual rituals for good harvest, that carries deep symbolic meaning for traditional Chinese concepts of cosmic order. The day will conclude with a formal state banquet hosted in Trump’s honor. A working meeting over tea and lunch is scheduled for the pair on Friday.

    The White House has pushed back against low expectations, maintaining that Trump entered the trip with clear goals to secure tangible outcomes before his departure. Senior administration officials have hinted that potential trade-related announcements could come during the visit, including a expected Chinese commitment to increase purchases of American agricultural goods including soybeans and beef, as well as U.S.-manufactured commercial aircraft. The Trump administration is also pushing to formalize a new bilateral Board of Trade designed to address longstanding commercial frictions between the two global economic powers through ongoing structured dialogue.

    Yet concrete details of any potential agreements remain elusive, even as geopolitical friction over the Iran conflict adds an extra layer of complexity to talks. China’s longstanding close economic ties to Iran have put Beijing at odds with Washington’s policy goals in the region, creating a major point of tension ahead of the summit.

    Trump’s three-day Beijing trip comes as the Iran conflict continues to dominate domestic U.S. political discourse, stoking growing fears of economic weakness in the U.S. as the country enters a heated midterm election cycle. With November’s congressional elections approaching, Trump’s Republican Party is fighting to retain control of both chambers of Congress, and the economic fallout from the Iran war has emerged as a top voter concern. The U.S.-led conflict with Iran has resulted in the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global chokepoint for oil and natural gas shipments, leaving energy tankers stranded and driving sharp spikes in global energy prices that threaten to undermine global economic growth.

    The extended, structured schedule of one-on-one engagement between Trump and Xi, set against the backdrop of formal diplomatic events, will create ample opportunity for the two leaders to tackle the full slate of thorny bilateral and global issues on the agenda. Beyond Iran and trade, those topics include the longstanding dispute over Taiwan and a proposed three-way nuclear arms limitation pact between the United States, China and Russia.

    Despite the open agenda, most diplomatic analysts expect little progress beyond ceremonial pleasantries and the mutual public praise that Trump and Xi have exchanged consistently for years. Jim Lewis, a technology policy fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, predicted that neither side will make meaningful headway on the two most contentious foreign policy issues up for discussion. “Trump will press the Chinese to help him on Iran. They’ll be unwilling. The Chinese will press Trump to make concessions on Taiwan. We’ll see what we get out of that,” Lewis explained.

    Back in Washington, domestic political tensions over the Iran conflict deepened Wednesday, when Senate Republicans again blocked Democratic legislation aimed at ending U.S. hostilities in Iran. The vote saw a rare party break from Alaska Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski, who crossed party lines to vote with Democrats, becoming the third Senate Republican to oppose continued U.S. military engagement in the conflict.

    As the world’s largest buyer of Iranian crude oil, China’s position on Iran is a core priority for the Trump administration. Trump has publicly downplayed suggestions that he will push Xi to take stronger action to pressure Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, though senior White House officials have confirmed that the president will make that case to Xi in closed-door negotiations.

    The president has also stressed that concerns over U.S. economic fallout will not soften his demands in negotiations over Iran, even amid a fragile current ceasefire. When asked as he departed the White House whether the financial strain on ordinary American households would factor into his Iranian negotiations, Trump responded bluntly: “Not even a little bit.”

    “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation. I think about one thing: We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said, adding that he believes “every American understands” that priority.

    The Trump administration has struggled to present a consistent public message on inflation and the Iran conflict, however. Vice President JD Vance told reporters Wednesday that Trump remained “laser focused” on tackling inflation, pushing back against the president’s own explicit comments that the U.S. economy was not a factor in resolving the war. When asked about Trump’s comments, Vance claimed, “Well, I don’t think the president said that. I think that’s a misrepresentation of what the president said.”

    Discussions over trade and Taiwan are also expected to be tense. The status of Taiwan looms large over the summit: China has long claimed the self-governing island as part of its sovereign territory, and Beijing has strongly objected to U.S. plans to sell advanced military weapons to Taipei. The Trump administration has already approved an $11 billion arms package for Taiwan, but has not yet moved forward with implementing the sale. Trump has also openly expressed greater ambivalence about U.S. commitments to Taiwan, a shift that has sparked widespread speculation about whether he could be open to rolling back American support for the island democracy.

    Taiwan is the world’s leading producer of advanced semiconductors, which are critical components for cutting-edge artificial intelligence development. Trump has sought to advance new trade deals with Taiwan that would incentivize increased chip manufacturing within the United States.

    Trump personally invited Jensen Huang, CEO of leading chipmaker Nvidia, to join him on Air Force One during a refueling stop in Alaska en route to Beijing. Huang is one of a dozen high-profile CEOs from the technology, defense, finance and agricultural sectors joining Trump’s official delegation. Other senior members of the U.S. delegation include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, as well as Trump’s son Eric Trump and daughter-in-law Lara Trump. Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who previously led Trump’s initiative to cut federal staffing and shrink the size of the federal government, is also part of the delegation.

    The U.S. and China reached a bilateral trade truce last year that eased tit-for-tat threats of steep new tariffs on each other’s goods. The White House says ongoing discussions have shown mutual interest in extending the agreement, though it remains unclear whether any formal announcement of an extension will come during this visit.

    Trump has said he will press Xi to grant greater market access to U.S. firms in China, saying he will urge his Chinese counterpart to “‘open up’ China so that these brilliant people can work their magic.” He is also seeking to extend an existing agreement that allows China to continue exporting rare earth minerals to the United States, a deal that has so far prevented Beijing from restricting global rare earth supplies in response to Trump’s earlier tariff threats.

    Senior U.S. officials have also confirmed that Trump will raise the proposal for a three-way nuclear arms pact between the U.S., China and Russia that would place caps on each nation’s nuclear arsenal, an idea that Beijing has previously viewed with open skepticism.

    Associated Press writer Seung Min Kim in Washington contributed reporting to this article.

  • US news reports of gloomy Iran war intel assessments anger Trump

    US news reports of gloomy Iran war intel assessments anger Trump

    A growing rift has erupted between the Trump White House and major U.S. news outlets after independent reporting revealed that classified U.S. intelligence assessments directly contradict the administration’s public claims that Iran’s military capabilities have been completely destroyed. The confrontation has sparked fresh alarms over escalating attacks on press freedom from the Trump administration, as policymakers face growing scrutiny over the trajectory of the ongoing conflict with Iran.

    The New York Times first broke the story on Tuesday, citing declassified internal assessments compiled earlier this month that draw a sharp distinction between the Trump administration’s upbeat public narrative and the confidential briefings provided to senior policymakers. According to the report, U.S. spy agencies have confirmed that Iran has rapidly reestablished operational access to the vast majority of its key missile infrastructure, including primary launch sites, mobile deployment units, and underground storage facilities that the administration claimed had been wiped out in joint U.S.-Israeli bombardment campaigns.

    Most concerning for senior national security officials, the assessments note that 30 out of Iran’s 33 active missile sites positioned along the Strait of Hormuz — one of the world’s most critical global energy chokepoints — are now fully operational once again. The reactivation of these sites puts U.S. naval vessels and commercial oil tankers transiting the strategic waterway at direct risk, the report added.

    The Times’ reporting followed a similar exclusive published one week earlier by The Washington Post, which outlined a confidential Central Intelligence Agency analysis delivered to top administration policymakers. The CIA assessment concluded that Iran’s economy could withstand a sustained U.S. naval blockade for a minimum of three to four months before encountering crippling hardship, contradicting administration claims that the blockade would force Tehran to capitulate in short order.

    The Post’s reporting also confirmed the core findings of the later New York Times assessment, noting that the broader U.S. intelligence community has determined that Iran retains the vast majority of its ballistic missile capacity despite weeks of intensive joint bombing campaigns. Citing an unnamed senior U.S. official, the outlet reported that Iran still holds roughly 75 percent of its pre-conflict inventory of mobile missile launchers and approximately 70 percent of its original stockpile of operational missiles. The official added that Iranian forces have successfully recovered and reopened nearly all of their underground weapons storage sites, repaired damaged missiles, and even completed assembly of new missiles that were near completion when the conflict began.

    Within hours of the Times’ publication, President Donald Trump took to his Truth Social platform to lash out at the reporting. Trump, who has repeatedly claimed Iran has been left with no functional military capacity, denounced the outlets’ reporting as “virtual TREASON,” arguing that the claims of intact Iranian military capabilities are false and outrageous. “They are aiding and abetting the enemy!” Trump wrote, doubling down on his original claim that “Iran has ‘no Navy, their Air Force is gone, all Technology is gone, their ‘leaders’ are no longer with us, and the Country is an Economic Disaster.”

    Beyond the divergence between public claims and classified intelligence on Iran’s capabilities, multiple independent reports have also revealed that the Trump administration has drastically understated the damage Iranian counterstrikes have inflicted on U.S. military assets across the Persian Gulf. In a report published late last month, NBC News cited three unnamed U.S. officials, two congressional aides, and an additional source familiar with the damage assessment, which found that U.S. bases and equipment suffered far more extensive damage than the administration has publicly acknowledged. The outlet added that repair costs are expected to reach into the billions of dollars.

    A subsequent Washington Post analysis of open-source satellite imagery reinforced these findings, documenting that Iranian strikes have damaged or destroyed at least 228 structures and pieces of equipment at U.S. military installations across the Middle East since the outbreak of hostilities. Targets have included aircraft hangars, troop barracks, fuel depots, fixed-wing aircraft, and critical infrastructure including radar systems, communications networks, and air defense installations — a scale of destruction vastly larger than the U.S. government has publicly admitted.

    Foreign policy analysts have already concluded that the Trump administration’s Iran strategy has suffered a major strategic failure 10 weeks into the conflict. Writing on Wednesday, Brookings Institution foreign policy scholar Phil Gordon argued that “10 weeks in, the strategic failure is undeniable” for the administration. Gordon warned that the greatest ongoing risk stems from the president’s inability to accept a setback: “The risk now is that having missed the opportunity to declare victory after the first few weeks, Trump can’t accept defeat and humiliation so will keep looking for the next quick fix, thereby likely only making things worse.”

    Top Trump administration officials have doubled down on attacks against the press for publishing the unflattering disclosures. Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth has already labeled U.S. media outlets “unpatriotic” and warned reporters to “think twice” before publishing classified information that contradicts the administration’s narrative. Earlier this week, The Wall Street Journal revealed that the U.S. Department of Justice issued subpoenas to the outlet’s journalists in March seeking records tied to their Iran war coverage.

    Katie Fallow, deputy litigation director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, called the subpoenas the latest example of the administration’s escalating campaign against press freedom. “Time and again, the administration has shown itself willing to disregard the First Amendment and long-standing limits on the use of government power to go after news outlets that publish embarrassing or critical information about the government,” Fallow said.

  • US commerce secretary details “off-putting” interaction with Epstein in testimony

    US commerce secretary details “off-putting” interaction with Epstein in testimony

    A congressional investigation into the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has made public sworn interview transcripts from two high-profile figures: U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Gateway Computers co-founder billionaire Ted Waitt. As of the release, neither man has faced any accusations of misconduct related to Epstein’s alleged criminal network from victims or investigative bodies.

    In his transcribed voluntary testimony before the House Oversight Committee on May 6, Lutnick outlined three brief encounters with Epstein, who was once his next-door neighbor in New York City. The commerce secretary, widely known as the key architect of the Trump administration’s global tariffs policy, told investigators that his first introduction to Epstein came in 2005, when he and his wife were invited to coffee at Epstein’s Manhattan home. During a tour of the residence, the couple was shown a room fitted with only a massage table and surrounded by candles. When Lutnick asked how often Epstein received massages there, the disgraced financier responded with a suggestive remark: “Every day and the right kind of massage.”

    Lutnick told the panel he found the comment deeply off-putting, and he and his wife left the property immediately after the exchange. He added that he made an explicit decision right then to cut off all personal and professional ties with Epstein, a statement he had previously given to congressional investigators. But newly released court documents from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Epstein investigation earlier this year revealed a previously undisclosed visit Lutnick made to Epstein’s private Caribbean island in 2012, years after he claimed to have severed all contact. The revelation sparked bipartisan demands for Lutnick’s resignation from the Trump Cabinet.

    During his recent testimony, Lutnick offered an explanation for the 2012 visit. He told the committee that Epstein’s staff reached out to his group unexpectedly while he was on a family vacation in St. Thomas, located just a short distance from Epstein’s private island. Lutnick said the unprompted contact left him unnerved, noting: “Without any communication for years, [how] would he inexplicably know where I’m going? It’s unsettling, actually.” The commerce secretary confirmed that he, his family, another couple and their children, plus accompanying staff, accepted the invitation for lunch. He emphasized that the group only dined outdoors on the island’s grounds and never entered any of the property’s buildings, describing the visit as unremarkable: “We sat outside, had lunch. It was boring. We left.” Lutnick also acknowledged one additional brief, casual interaction with Epstein in 2011 focused on construction scaffolding, which he described as completely meaningless and inconsequential.

    Alongside Lutnick’s transcript, the committee also released the record of its April 30 interview with Waitt, the billionaire tech entrepreneur. Waitt detailed his six-year romantic relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s convicted co-conspirator, which ran from 2004 to 2010. Waitt told investigators he had very limited direct contact with Epstein and never witnessed any illegal or harmful activity during his relationship with Maxwell.

    Waitt told the panel he understood Maxwell’s role with Epstein to be that of an estate manager, responsible for overseeing the financier’s multiple properties and staff. He added that he always felt uncomfortable with the dynamic between the pair, noting that Epstein held clear sway over Maxwell, who consistently deferred to him: “He did seem to have significant influence over her, she always kind of look[ed] up to him and I was not comfortable with that.” Waitt also confirmed that their relationship overlapped with Epstein’s 2008 guilty plea in Florida to charges related to the prostitution of a minor. He said Maxwell was subpoenaed to testify in the case during that time, and that she was visibly stressed by the legal proceedings but repeatedly denied any personal involvement in Epstein’s crimes.

    Waitt stated that he and Maxwell never cohabitated, as he maintained a primary residence in California while she lived mostly in New York. He denied having any knowledge of abuse or misconduct by either Epstein or Maxwell, and said he had no awareness of Maxwell ever traveling to Epstein’s private island during their relationship. He added that Maxwell was not publicly identified as a co-conspirator in Epstein’s crimes until after their relationship ended, and he did not learn of the formal charges against her until she was arrested by federal authorities.

  • Supporters of bill to aid Ukraine and sanction Russia hit number to force House vote

    Supporters of bill to aid Ukraine and sanction Russia hit number to force House vote

    A cross-partisan coalition of Ukraine supporters in the U.S. House of Representatives crossed a critical procedural milestone on Wednesday, securing the required number of signatures to force a floor vote on a package of new Ukraine aid and Russian sanctions, bypassing top Republican leadership in the chamber. The push for a vote, led by New York Democratic Representative Gregory Meeks, will bring legislation to the House floor in the coming weeks that codifies U.S. support for Kyiv. It proposes allocating more than $1 billion in direct security assistance to Ukraine, alongside an additional $8 billion in loaned funding for the war-torn nation.

    Proponents of the measure have repeatedly pushed the Trump administration to take a harder line against Moscow and ramp up military backing for Kyiv as its war with Russia enters its fourth year. To trigger a discharge vote — the procedural mechanism that allows rank-and-file lawmakers to bypass committee gridlock and leadership opposition — backers needed 218 signatures on a discharge petition. They hit that exact threshold on Wednesday, after California Independent Representative Kevin Kiley signed on as the decisive vote.

    The petition draws broad Democratic support, with 215 House Democrats adding their names, joined by just two House Republicans: Nebraska’s Don Bacon and Pennsylvania’s Brian Fitzpatrick. In his statement explaining his support for the petition, Kiley emphasized that the legislation would reinforce Ukraine’s negotiating position to reach a lasting, sustainable peace deal. He also added that the bill sends an unambiguous warning to Moscow that Russia’s ongoing backing for Iran’s targeting of U.S. military assets in the Middle East will not go unanswered by Congress.

    Despite the procedural breakthrough, House Speaker Mike Johnson, the chamber’s top Republican leader, has raised public concerns about the timing of the vote. Johnson noted that both Russian President Vladimir Putin and former President Donald Trump have recently signaled that the war could be nearing an end, and argued that Congress should wait to see how diplomatic efforts unfold before holding a vote. “The latest news out of Russia is that it looks like the war is scaling back, scaling down, coming to a conclusion. I think Vladimir Putin said that himself in the last few days, and so this would be a good time for Congress to see how that pans out,” Johnson told reporters this week.

    Trump echoed that optimistic tone on Tuesday, telling reporters ahead of a summit in Beijing that he expects Moscow and Kyiv to finalize a peace deal in the near future. “The end of the war in Ukraine I really think is getting very close,” Trump said. Putin similarly claimed in a speech last weekend that his full-scale invasion of Ukraine could be “coming to an end.”

    Those optimistic claims have been sharply contradicted by new violence on the ground, however. On Wednesday, the same day backers locked in the final petition signature, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that Russia launched a massive daytime drone barrage across Ukraine, deploying at least 800 drones in one of the largest single attacks of the entire war. The strike killed at least six civilians and wounded dozens more, including multiple children.

    That ongoing violence led Fitzpatrick, one of the two Republican supporters of the discharge petition, to reject the claim that the war is winding down. The GOP lawmaker stressed that he would only withdraw his backing for the bill if Russia fully withdraws all of its military forces from internationally recognized Ukrainian territory. “There’s people dying as we speak, so no, the war is not winding down,” Fitzpatrick said.

    Meeks, the lead sponsor of the effort, echoed that argument, noting that the vote will finally force every member of Congress to go on the public record with their stance on Ukraine support. “Members of Congress, some tell me that they are supportive of Ukraine. Well, we’re going to finally get a vote on the floor to make that determination,” Meeks said. He added that the House vote will build pressure on the U.S. Senate to act, and send a clear message to Trump that the American public supports standing with U.S. allies rather than aligning with the Kremlin.

    Even if the bill passes the House, its future in the Senate remains far from certain. For months, senators from both parties have debated a range of Russia sanction and Ukraine aid packages, but momentum stalled after Trump launched military strikes against Iran in late February. While most Senate Republicans have voiced nominal support for Ukraine, they have been reluctant to advance any legislation without explicit backing from the Trump administration. On Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune cast doubt on the chamber’s ability to take up Russia sanctions in the near term, noting that the Senate is already backed up with other pending legislation.

    South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, one of the most prominent GOP advocates for Russia sanctions in the Senate, offered a mixed assessment of the House-passed package this week, saying he supports some provisions but opposes others. Lawmakers from both parties have also expressed growing frustration over the Pentagon’s failure to disburse $400 million in previously approved military aid for Ukraine that Congress allocated last year. During a congressional hearing earlier this week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers the department is currently developing a plan to release the long-delayed funds.

    Support for Ukraine has emerged as one of the most persistent points of tension between Congress and the Trump administration, after Trump pledged during his campaign to rapidly end the war within days of taking office. To date, the administration has failed to make meaningful progress toward a negotiated peace deal, and has repeatedly moved to scale back military support for Ukraine and reduce U.S. security commitments across Europe.