作者: admin

  • South Korea’s Starbucks to shut for staff history lesson after backlash

    South Korea’s Starbucks to shut for staff history lesson after backlash

    South Korea’s Starbucks franchise has announced an unprecedented nationwide early closure of all its retail locations next week, a direct response to widespread public fury sparked by a tone-deaf promotional campaign that coincided with the anniversary of the 1980 Gwangju Uprising, a defining pro-democracy movement bloodily suppressed by the country’s former military dictatorship.

    The ill-fated promotion, labeled “Tank Day,” centered on the launch of new “Tank Series” reusable tumblers marketed for their large volume, and it launched on the very date that South Koreans commemorate the 1980 crackdown, in which military forces deployed by authoritarian ruler Chun Doo-hwan killed at least 165 unarmed civilian protesters — many locals and historians believe the actual death toll is far higher. Subsequent official investigations have also confirmed that troops carried out widespread indiscriminate beatings, torture, and sexual violence against civilians during the crackdown, a trauma the nation has only slowly reckoned with in recent decades.

    The Gwangju Uprising stands as a cornerstone of South Korea’s modern democratic journey: it became a unifying rallying point for pro-democracy activists over seven years, ultimately leading to the mass 1988 June Democracy Movement that ended Chun’s 8-year authoritarian rule. Chun was later convicted of treason and corruption in 1996, received a presidential pardon, and died in 2021 at age 90. In recent years, formal acts of accountability have included a 2018 government apology to survivors of sexual violence committed by troops, and a public apology this year from Chun’s own grandson, Chun Woo-won, who called his grandfather a “sinner and slaughterer” and expressed remorse for the delayed apology to victims’ families.

    Beyond the insensitive “Tank Day” name, which echoed the military tanks deployed to crush the uprising, critics also flagged a second problematic slogan used in the campaign: the Korean phrase “tak on the table,” which uses the word “tak” that is identical to the term used in a controversial 1987 police statement about the death of a student activist in custody. The franchise later confirmed that marketing teams selected the slogan after relying on an AI tool for creative suggestions.

    The backlash erupted rapidly last month, drawing condemnation from all corners of South Korean society. President Lee Jae Myung publicly called out the campaign as “inhumane and disgraceful” on social media, while consumer advocates organized boycotts that led to protests outside Starbucks locations across the country and a reported steep drop in sales for the chain.

    In the immediate wake of the scandal, Shinsegae Group, which holds the licensing agreement to operate Starbucks in South Korea, terminated the contract of the franchise’s national chief executive. Now, the company has announced sweeping corrective measures to address the public outrage. Starting this Monday, all Starbucks Korea employees will complete mandatory training focused on historical awareness and social sensitivity through educational video content. Next Wednesday, all locations across the country will close at 3 p.m. local time (6 a.m. GMT) for three hours of in-person historical education, and will not reopen until the following day. The company confirmed that Shinsegae Group Chairman Chung Yong-jin will personally participate in the mandatory training alongside frontline staff. This marks the first time Starbucks Korea has ordered a nationwide early closure of all stores since the brand first entered the South Korean market in 1999.

    In an initial statement after the scandal broke, the franchise offered a vague apology for “inconvenience and concern” caused to customers, but the sweeping new measures signal how seriously the company is taking the public backlash over its failure to recognize the sensitive historical context of the promotion.

  • The UK is banning children’s social media use. Here’s what other countries are doing

    The UK is banning children’s social media use. Here’s what other countries are doing

    In a landmark policy shift aimed at shielding young people from harmful online content and the risks of prolonged screen time, the United Kingdom has announced plans to prohibit all individuals under the age of 16 from accessing a suite of major social media platforms, including Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube.

    This move places the UK at the forefront of a growing international push to enforce age-based access controls for social media, a trend that has sparked intense debate across stakeholder groups. While many parents and child protection organizations have praised the new restrictions as a much-needed step to safeguard vulnerable youth, critics have raised two core concerns: the policies are largely unworkable in practice, and they carry significant risks to user privacy that have not been adequately addressed.

    To contextualize the UK’s new policy, a global scan of similar regulatory efforts reveals a coordinated wave of action targeting minor’s social media access:

    **Australia**
    Australia pioneered one of the world’s most sweeping nationwide under-16 social media bans when it rolled out its policy last December. The regulation bars users under 16 from holding accounts on 10 major platforms, covering Facebook, Instagram, Kick, Reddit, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube, and Twitch. Non-compliant tech firms face maximum fines of 49.5 million Australian dollars, equivalent to roughly 35 million U.S. dollars. To date, no penalties have been issued, but the Australian government reports that platforms have already closed nearly 5 million accounts confirmed to belong to underage users.

    **Indonesia**
    Back in March, Indonesian authorities unveiled their own restrictions, barring users under 16 from creating accounts on a wide range of platforms deemed to carry risks of addiction, pornography, online scams, and cyberbullying. The prohibited platforms include major global services such as YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live, and the popular gaming platform Roblox.

    **Malaysia**
    Malaysia’s regulatory framework requires all social media platforms with at least 8 million active domestic users — including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube — to implement mandatory age verification systems and block under-16 users from registering new accounts. Companies that fail to meet the requirements face financial penalties of up to 10 million Malaysian ringgit, or approximately 2.5 million U.S. dollars.

    **Brazil**
    Brazil has taken a more nuanced approach to regulation, with a new law that came into force in March stopping short of a full ban on under-16 social media use. Instead, the law requires all accounts held by users under 16 to be linked to a legal guardian to enable adult supervision. The legislation also outlaws intentionally addictive platform features, such as infinite scroll and automatic video playback. Additionally, it mandates that platforms implement robust age verification mechanisms that go far beyond simple self-declaration of age, to block minors from accessing inappropriate content.

    **Canada**
    Earlier this month, Canadian lawmakers introduced new legislation that would establish a dedicated national regulator, the Digital Safety Commission of Canada. Under the proposed rules, users under 16 would be barred from holding social media accounts unless platform operators can prove they have effective systems in place to remove harmful content, including nonconsensual intimate imagery, content that encourages self-harm in minors, and material that incites violence or spreads hatred.

    **Global Pipeline of New Regulation**
    A host of other nations are already in the process of developing or considering their own age-based restrictions on social media access for minors. This group includes France, Spain, Denmark, Greece, Thailand, and South Korea, signaling that the global trend toward stricter online protection for youth is only expected to accelerate in the coming months.

  • Drone strikes kill over 1,000 civilians in Sudan in the first 5 months of 2026, UN rights chief says

    Drone strikes kill over 1,000 civilians in Sudan in the first 5 months of 2026, UN rights chief says

    GENEVA – A senior United Nations official has sounded the alarm over a catastrophic escalation of civilian harm in Sudan’s four-year ongoing conflict, confirming that drone strikes alone have killed more than 1,000 non-combatant civilians across the war-torn northeast African nation between January and May 2026. U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk announced the grim findings during an address to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on Monday, highlighting that the growing deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles has drastically raised the death toll for civilian populations caught in the crossfire between Sudan’s warring factions.

    Türk’s remarks detailed a documented sharp uptick in three devastating trends of the conflict: expanded drone warfare, widespread sexual violence, and mass atrocities that meet international definitions of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Sudanese conflict first erupted on April 15, 2023, when a long-simmering power struggle between Sudan’s formal national military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) broke out into open armed combat, starting in the capital Khartoum before spreading to every major region of the country.

    Data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), a U.S.-based conflict monitoring organization, underscores the scale of the drone-driven surge in fatalities. By ACLED’s count, at least 2,670 people — a mix of combatants and civilians — died in drone-related incidents across Sudan in 2025. That marked a 600% jump in total drone-linked deaths and an 81% rise in the number of drone attacks compared to 2024 figures. Over the full first three years of the conflict, ACLED recorded at least 59,000 total fatalities, though the organization has cautioned that the actual death toll is almost certainly much higher, as widespread insecurity and collapsed communication infrastructure make full, accurate on-the-ground reporting nearly impossible.

    Most recently, a drone strike carried out by the RSF last week hit civilian sites in Sudan’s central city of el-Obeid, targeting a public cemetery and a commercial gas station. Local health officials confirmed that the attack left at least 15 people dead.

    According to Türk’s briefing, both the Sudanese military and the RSF have increasingly deployed explosive-laden drones in their operations, with repeated strikes targeting civilian infrastructure that is protected under international humanitarian law. Documented targets have included hospitals, hydroelectric dams, schools, open-air public markets, and camps for internally displaced people. Today, drone strikes have emerged as the deadliest single threat to civilians in Sudan’s conflict, a crisis that has been largely overshadowed by higher-profile international conflicts in Gaza and Iran in recent months.

    Beyond the growing carnage from drone attacks, Türk confirmed that rape and other forms of sexual violence have become rampant across regions controlled by both warring parties. The United Nations and independent international human rights organizations have documented mass rape and ethnically targeted killings that rise to the level of systematic crimes against humanity.

    The protracted conflict has also spiraled into what the UN describes as the world’s most severe ongoing humanitarian catastrophe. Approximately 34 million Sudanese — nearly two-thirds of the country’s entire population — currently require life-saving humanitarian assistance, while widespread fighting has reduced major urban centers to rubble and left critical basic services nonfunctional across most of the country.

  • France star Mbappe vows to increase defensive work

    France star Mbappe vows to increase defensive work

    As France enters the 2026 FIFA World Cup as two-time champions, their new captain Kylian Mbappe is making a public commitment to shore up a key gap in his game ahead of the team’s opening group stage match against Senegal on Tuesday. The 27-year-old striker, who completed a high-profile transfer from Paris Saint-Germain to Real Madrid in 2024, has faced mounting criticism in his second season at the Santiago Bernabeu, where the club finished the campaign trophy-less despite his individual success as La Liga’s top goalscorer.

    Much of the scrutiny has centered on Mbappe’s limited defensive output, a weakness backed up by official Opta data across Europe’s top five leagues. Among 1,490 players with at least 19 league appearances in the 2025-26 season, Mbappe ranked 1,350th in combined defensive metrics including interceptions, blocks, tackles, and recovered possession. His rate of just 0.14 tackles per 90 minutes placed him in the bottom five of the same ranking. Compounding these on-pitch questions, Mbappe also missed a portion of Real Madrid’s season with a hamstring injury, and the club’s trophy drought fueled growing fan frustration and unconfirmed reports of unrest in the first-team dressing room.

    The French star has not been without support in the face of this criticism. His international teammate Ousmane Dembele recently spoke out publicly, arguing that the negative commentary targeting Mbappe has gone “too far”. During a recent interview with French newspaper Le Parisien, where questions were posed by teammates and close friends, Mbappe’s younger brother Ethan – who currently plays for Ligue 1 side Lille – teased the captain over his defensive shortcomings. Rather than pushing back on the critique, Mbappe acknowledged the gap in his game and pledged to improve ahead of the World Cup.

    “I need to take the extra step [with my defensive work] because it’s something important for the team and I have to do it,” Mbappe told the outlet. “It will start this time because we want to win, and to win, I’m ready to do whatever because I want to win at all costs.”

    For Mbappe, this World Cup carries extra personal milestones beyond the team’s pursuit of a third global title. This is his first tournament as France’s full-time captain, having stepped into the role following Hugo Lloris’ retirement from international football in 2023. Already one of the most prolific goalscorers in World Cup history, with 12 goals in 14 tournament appearances to date – including a historic hat-trick in the 2022 final against Argentina – one more goal will tie him with Olivier Giroud as France’s all-time leading men’s international goalscorer.

    After kicking off their group stage campaign against Senegal, Didier Deschamps’ side will face Iraq and Norway in their remaining two pool matches as they look to progress to the knockout rounds of the 2026 World Cup.

  • London court convicts 2 men of plot to torch property linked to UK prime minister

    London court convicts 2 men of plot to torch property linked to UK prime minister

    LONDON – A London court has handed down guilty convictions to two foreign nationals in connection with a coordinated arson conspiracy targeting properties linked to United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer, a plot organized by an unidentified Russian-speaking figure who remains untraced and uncharged, authorities confirmed Monday.

    The series of deliberate fires were carried out in May 2025, targeting three sites connected to Starmer: the residential home he vacated after taking office as prime minister, a co-owned apartment building, and his former Toyota sport utility vehicle, which was completely destroyed in the blaze. Remarkably, no people were injured in the overnight attacks, though multiple residents experienced life-threatening fear and property damage. Starmer’s sister-in-law, who was residing in his former home at the time of the attack, recalled waking to a loud explosion and thick smoke that choked the stairwell, leaving her 9-year-old daughter panicked. Another occupant of the targeted apartment building was forced to flee to the building’s roof to escape toxic smoke that filled all interior hallways.

    According to trial evidence, the conspiracy was masterminded by an individual operating under the alias “El Money,” who recruited participants via the encrypted messaging platform Telegram. The ringleader offered 22-year-old Ukrainian national Roman Lavrynovych payment in cryptocurrency to carry out the arson attacks and capture video footage of the damage to be posted online, ensuring the attack received widespread public attention. El Money’s true identity has never been uncovered, and he has not been named in any charges connected to the plot.

    Commander Helen Flanagan, lead of the Metropolitan Police’s counterterrorism unit, told reporters that investigators have not uncovered concrete evidence linking the plot to a hostile state actor, as authorities have not been able to establish El Money’s underlying motive or confirm who he may be working for. Even so, Flanagan noted that the clear intent of the attack was transparent: “Clearly the tasking was to intimidate and create fear for the prime minister and to attack the U.K.”

    Alongside Lavrynovych, 27-year-old Romanian citizen Stanislav Carpiuc was also found guilty of conspiracy to damage property by fire at London’s Central Criminal Court. Carpiuc served as a middleman coordinating between El Money and the arsonist, while 35-year-old Ukrainian national Petro Pochynok, who was accused of being recruited to film the attacks for payment, was acquitted of all charges by the jury.

    Lavrynovych received additional convictions on two counts of arson that recklessly endangered human life. During his trial, the defendant admitted to carrying out the fires, telling the court he took the job to earn £3,000 ($4,000) to cover urgent medical costs for his ill father. He claimed he only followed through on the plot after direct threats from El Money, and testified that he had no knowledge the properties were linked to Starmer until after the blazes were set. He also told investigators he had never even heard of the UK prime minister before his arrest, and insisted he never intended to harm any residents.

    Court records show El Money provided step-by-step instructions for the attack, including exact details of each target, guidance on mixing flammable materials, and tactics to avoid detection by law enforcement. Recovered messages from Lavrynovych’s phone also revealed he had carried out other paid vandalism for El Money previously, including blacking out car windshields and placing anti-Islam posters in majority-Muslim neighborhoods of London.

    As part of the pre-arranged plan, El Money instructed Lavrynovych to send a secret message using the code word “geranium” if he was taken into police custody. Unusually, Lavrynovych was arrested shortly after sending the code, and he never received the promised payment for carrying out the three fires.

    The two convicted men are scheduled to receive their official sentencing this Friday, as the Metropolitan Police continues its investigation to track down the elusive ringleader El Money.

  • Former American businessman detained in Myanmar after alleged financial misconduct

    Former American businessman detained in Myanmar after alleged financial misconduct

    In a development that has drawn international attention, Adam Castillo, the former president of the American Chamber of Commerce (AMCHAM) in Myanmar and founder of a prominent local security firm, has been taken into custody shortly after arriving at Yangon International Airport. The detention comes as AMCHAM Myanmar conducts an internal investigation into suspicious financial activity linked to former board members of the organization.

    An anonymous associate of Castillo, who requested anonymity out of fear for personal safety, confirmed to the Associated Press that the 41-year-old U.S. national was detained on Thursday. Castillo, who leads AGS Myanmar — a risk management and security firm that also offers commercial cleaning and pest control services — has not issued any public response to the detention, and his company declined to elaborate on the situation beyond calling it an “ongoing matter”. Messages sent to Castillo via his personal website also went unanswered.

    U.S. State Department officials have confirmed they are aware of reports of the American citizen’s detention, but declined to provide further details, citing privacy protections for U.S. nationals abroad. Myanmar’s military-backed ruling administration, which has faced widespread international isolation since its 2021 coup and has limited communication with international media amid the ongoing civil conflict, has not released any official statement regarding Castillo’s arrest. Requests for comment from Myanmar’s central government, the Yangon regional administration, and the Yangon Regional Police Department went unanswered. Multiple military-aligned local media outlets, including NP News, have reported that the arrest followed a formal complaint filed against Castillo by AMCHAM Myanmar. Castillo led the organization, which advocates for American business interests operating in Myanmar, from 2023 through early 2025.

    When contacted for comment on the complaint, AMCHAM Myanmar’s executive director Myat Phyu The declined to share specific details of the case, but directed reporters to the chamber’s May 29 annual report, which addresses the ongoing investigation. According to the document, the current AMCHAM board discovered questionable transactions carried out by former board representatives last year, and immediately turned the matter over to an independent law firm for forensic review.

    The investigation uncovered that an unnamed former board representative signed a November 2024 contract with a Washington D.C.-based public relations firm. The firm paid $300,000 in connection with the deal, and the full sum was collected and disbursed outside of AMCHAM Myanmar’s official financial accounts. The annual report notes that the unauthorized signature exceeded the formal signing authority granted to individual board members, and the full board never approved the agreement. “AMCHAM Myanmar received no funds, made no payments, and received no services, and the matter was not disclosed to the statutory auditors,” the report reads.

    While the report confirms that two former board members are involved in the suspicious activity, it does not name either individual nor outline what internal legal or disciplinary actions the chamber has pursued to date. Myat Phyu The also declined to elaborate on details beyond what is included in the public report. In a June 12 statement posted to the organization’s official website, the AMCHAM board said it “has taken appropriate steps to safeguard the interests of the organization and its members.”

    Myanmar has been engulfed in widespread armed conflict since the military seized power from the democratically elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi in a 2021 coup. After the junta violently crushed peaceful mass protests against the takeover, pro-democracy guerrilla groups and ethnic minority militias launched a widespread armed resistance movement that has left much of the country divided and mired in ongoing violence. Since the coup, authorities have increasingly detained foreign nationals, most frequently foreign reporters covering the country’s political and humanitarian crisis.

    Public profiles on AGS Myanmar’s website list Castillo as a former U.S. Marine Corps officer who completed active duty tours in Afghanistan. He also currently serves as chair of Republican Overseas Myanmar, a group founded in 2024 that works to promote former U.S. President Donald Trump’s “America First” policy agenda across Myanmar and the broader Southeast Asian region.

    It remains unclear where Castillo traveled before his return to Yangon, but social media posts to his public Instagram account show he attended a business forum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, just one day before his arrest, where he promoted his recently published memoir. Castillo’s book, titled *Finding Our Voice*, chronicles his personal experiences living and working in Myanmar through the political upheaval, rising violence, and economic collapse that followed the 2021 military takeover. It is not yet known whether the publication of the memoir is connected to his detention.

  • UK’s ban on Palestine Action under terror legislation was lawful, Court of Appeal says

    UK’s ban on Palestine Action under terror legislation was lawful, Court of Appeal says

    LONDON – In a landmark ruling that has ignited fierce debate over the balance between national security and civil liberties in the United Kingdom, the London Court of Appeal confirmed on Monday that the British government acted within legal bounds when it designated protest group Palestine Action as an official terrorist organization.

    Leading the panel of judges, Chief Justice Sue Carr rejected the group’s core framing of itself as a legitimate civil disobedience movement focused on political advocacy. Instead, Carr emphasized that Palestine Action operates through a network of secretive, decentralized cells, which have targeted and destroyed property belonging to UK defense contractors and on British military installations.

    “To describe Palestine Action as a non-violent movement is not a defensible claim,” Carr wrote in the court’s judgment. “That core premise of the group’s argument is fundamentally and irreparably flawed.”

    Monday’s ruling reverses an earlier February decision issued by three senior High Court justices. In that initial ruling, judges acknowledged that the group had engaged in criminal activity to advance its political goals, but concluded the scope of those actions did not meet the threshold required for a full proscription as a terrorist organization. The government’s ban on the group remained in effect throughout the appeals process, pending the court’s final decision.

    In response to the ruling, Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori said the group would continue its legal challenge to the ban “all the way” to the UK Supreme Court, and if needed, to the European Court of Human Rights. Ammori called the proscription “one of the most extreme attacks on free speech and the right to protest in modern British history.”

    The British government first moved to outlaw the group in 2025, after activists breached security at a Royal Air Force base in June of that year to protest the UK’s ongoing military support for Israel’s military campaign against Hamas in Gaza. The Gaza offensive has killed more than 45,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, and that base break-in followed a string of earlier vandalism incidents carried out by the group across the UK.

    Under the terms of the proscription, Palestine Action is now listed alongside designated terrorist groups including al-Qaida and Hamas. Membership in the group, or even public support for it, is a criminal offense punishable by a maximum 14-year prison sentence.

    Already, law enforcement data shows more than 3,300 people have been arrested at protests across the UK simply for holding signs that read “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.” More than 700 of those individuals have been formally charged under the UK’s Terrorism Act, though none have yet been convicted of any offense related to those charges.

    Civil liberties advocates and supporters of Palestine Action warn that the widespread arrests of peaceful demonstrators represent a clear violation of long-standing rights to free expression and peaceful protest in the UK. The grassroots group Defend Our Juries issued a statement warning that the Court of Appeal’s ruling will lead to even more misallocation of police resources, wasting public funds on locking up ordinary people engaged in peaceful political advocacy. “It appears the courts have been instrumentalized to suppress opposition to genocide, when they should be doing the precise opposite,” the group said.

    Founded in 2020, Palestine Action has organized hundreds of direct action protests at military and defense industry sites across the UK, including repeated break-ins at facilities owned by Elbit Systems UK, an Israeli-owned arms manufacturer. UK government officials estimate the group’s actions have caused millions of British pounds in property damage, and argue that the disruptions pose tangible risks to UK national security.

    Even in its earlier February ruling, the High Court acknowledged that some of the group’s acts met the legal definition of terrorist activity, but judges held that those individual acts could be prosecuted through standard criminal law without needing to ban the entire organization.

    Just days before Monday’s appeal ruling, four Palestine Action members who broke into an Elbit Systems factory in Bristol, southwest England, in 2024 and damaged manufacturing equipment were sentenced to prison after a judge ruled their actions qualified as terrorist activity. More than 100 Palestine Action supporters were arrested outside the London court holding the sentencing hearing for holding a peaceful demonstration in solidarity with the activists.

  • How is Australia’s under-16 ban working out?

    How is Australia’s under-16 ban working out?

    In recent years, Australia has emerged as one of the first nations to implement strict regulations on social media access for minors, rolling out a nationwide ban that prohibits users under the age of 16 from creating accounts on major social platforms. Designed to protect young people from the well-documented harms of excessive online exposure – including cyberbullying, mental health struggles, and exposure to inappropriate content – the policy represented a landmark shift in global digital youth protection frameworks.

    Now, months after the ban entered into force, questions are growing over how well the regulation is actually working on the ground. Is the ban successfully locking out underage users, or have loopholes allowed younger Australians to continue accessing the platforms they use daily? To answer these critical questions, BBC correspondent Katy Watson launched an on-the-ground investigation to test the accessibility of major social apps for Australian minors.

    Watson’s inquiry centers on a simple but pressing question: can Australian youngsters still easily bypass age checks to access social media platforms? Many digital rights advocates and child protection experts have warned that age verification systems currently used by most social platforms remain woefully inadequate, relying largely on self-reporting that underage users can easily circumvent by falsifying their birth dates. The investigation will look into whether these warnings are reflected in real-world experiences, and what gaps remain in Australia’s pioneering age ban policy.

    As countries around the world debate their own rules for underage social media use, Australia’s experiment is being closely watched by policymakers, tech companies, and child welfare groups globally. The findings of Watson’s investigation will not only shape domestic debates over digital regulation in Australia, but also provide critical lessons for other nations looking to balance youth protection with the realities of modern digital life.

  • Brazil woman dies after rope-jumping instructors fail to attach cord

    Brazil woman dies after rope-jumping instructors fail to attach cord

    A devastating extreme sports accident has claimed the life of a 21-year-old woman in southern Brazil, leaving three instructors in custody and sparking new debate over unregulated extreme activities and government infrastructure management. The fatal incident unfolded Saturday at the iconic Ponte do Esqueleto, widely known as the Skeleton Bridge, an abandoned span that straddles the border between the São Paulo state cities of Limeira and Cordeirópolis.

    Maria Eduarda Rodrigues de Freitas, the victim, was guided to the edge of the 40-meter (131-foot) high bridge by the three men who were acting as her jumping instructors. Tragically, investigators confirmed the instructors failed to secure her safety rope to the bridge’s anchor point before pushing her off the edge. Viral social media footage captured the chaotic moments immediately after the jump: as Rodrigues de Freitas began plummeting downward, an onlooker can be heard shouting a panicked warning that the rope had not been attached.

    Emergency responders rushed to the scene after the fall, but medical personnel pronounced Rodrigues de Freitas dead at the location of the accident. She was laid to rest the following day, in a service attended by grieving family and friends.

    Local law enforcement has taken the three instructors into custody, and investigators are currently assessing whether to file charges of homicide with eventual intent. This legal classification applies in cases where an individual does not set out to intentionally kill, but willingly proceeds despite being aware their actions could result in another person’s death. Details about the instructors’ affiliation remain unconfirmed: local authorities initially stated they worked for a private commercial company offering commercial rope-jumping excursions, though some local reports suggest they may have been part of an informal, unregistered group of extreme sports enthusiasts.

    Unlike the more widely known bungee jumping, which uses elastic cords to create vertical bounces after a fall, rope-jumping relies on low-stretch climbing ropes. This design converts the energy of a free fall into a smooth pendulum-style horizontal swing, a feature that has made the activity popular among thrill-seeking practitioners.

    The Skeleton Bridge, the site of Saturday’s accident, has been abandoned for decades and falls under the ownership and management oversight of the Brazilian federal government. In the wake of the tragedy, Brazil’s Secretariat of Federal Assets (SPU) issued a public statement confirming the agency stands ready to provide all necessary assistance to law enforcement leading the investigation.

    Limeira’s municipal government has responded sharply to the incident, announcing it plans to file a lawsuit against the federal government over the neglected bridge. In an official statement, the city hall noted it had repeatedly pursued administrative actions and called for intervention from federal agencies responsible for the abandoned infrastructure. Rodrigues de Freitas’ death, the statement said, has made ongoing federal inaction “unsustainable and unacceptable.”

  • South African TV star arrested after allegedly kidnapping man in girlfriend dispute

    South African TV star arrested after allegedly kidnapping man in girlfriend dispute

    One of South Africa’s most recognizable entertainment figures, rapper and television host Molemo “Jub Jub” Maarohanye, is once again facing criminal allegations after police took him into custody this week, accusing the star of kidnapping a taxi driver and firing a weapon in his direction. According to official police statements, the alleged incident unfolded early on Sunday morning in Edenvale, a suburban town located approximately 16 miles northeast of Johannesburg.

    Authorities say Maarohanye confronted the taxi driver immediately after the driver had dropped off a passenger, at roughly 05:30 GMT. The confrontation stemmed from a personal dispute: Maarohanye reportedly accused the driver of entering a romantic relationship with his current girlfriend. Following the confrontation, the star allegedly forced the unnamed driver into his own vehicle before discharging a firearm toward the man. In a fortunate turn of events, the driver managed to escape the encounter without physical injury, and fled directly to a nearby local police station to file an official report.

    As of the latest updates, Maarohanye has not issued any public statement responding to the allegations brought against him. Police confirmed that the media personality is scheduled to make his first court appearance at the Germiston Magistrate’s Court on Wednesday, where the initial hearing for the case will be held.

    This arrest marks the latest in a long string of high-profile legal encounters for the once-leading South African musician, who rose to mainstream fame in the 2000s and early 2010s before his first major criminal conviction. In 2012, Maarohanye was found guilty of murder and attempted murder in connection with a high-profile drag racing incident that left four schoolchildren dead and two additional people injured. The conviction was overturned by South Africa’s High Court just two years later, and courts instead convicted him of the lesser charge of manslaughter.

    Most recently, in 2023, Maarohanye was arrested on a separate set of charges including rape, attempted murder, and assault, following accusations from a former romantic partner. Those charges were ultimately dropped by South Africa’s National Prosecuting Authority in 2024, after the agency concluded there were no reasonable prospects for a successful conviction in the case.

    Despite his lengthy legal history, Maarohanye has maintained a prominent public profile in South Africa in recent years. He currently serves as the host of *Uyajola 9/9*, a popular reality television series focused on exposing infidelity in romantic relationships that draws millions of viewers across the country.