作者: admin

  • Slovenia set for a right-wing government and a comeback for former Prime Minister Jansa

    Slovenia set for a right-wing government and a comeback for former Prime Minister Jansa

    Nearly two months after Slovenia held its closely contested parliamentary election, a path to a new government has finally emerged, with veteran right-wing politician Janez Jansa on track to retake the post of prime minister following his official nomination to the national parliament on Tuesday.

    A 67-year-old political figure who has already held the prime minister’s office three times previously, Jansa received his formal nomination from legislators of his own Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS). If confirmed by parliament, he will helm a new right-leaning coalition government that brings together multiple conservative-aligned groups, with extra backing provided by a first-term anti-establishment party that entered the legislature in the latest vote.

    As of Tuesday, parliamentary authorities had not yet announced a firm date for the final confirmation vote on Jansa’s premiership and his proposed cabinet. Slovenia’s public broadcaster RTV Slovenia has confirmed that Jansa already commands the support of 48 of the 90 total lawmakers in the country’s national assembly, putting him within reach of the backing needed to form a government.

    A successful confirmation would shift the small European Union member state sharply to the right politically, ending four years of liberal governance under outgoing Prime Minister Robert Golob. Jansa, a known admirer of former U.S. President Donald Trump and a long-time close ally of populist Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, most recently held the prime ministership from 2020 to 2022. It was in that year’s election that Golob’s liberal Freedom Movement party unseated Jansa’s government.

    Jansa has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of Golob’s outgoing administration, taking particular aim at the liberal government’s 2024 decision to formally recognize Palestinian statehood.

    The April 22 parliamentary election left Slovenia’s two major political blocs deadlocked: Jansa’s SDS and Golob’s Freedom Movement finished with nearly identical seat shares in the assembly. After weeks of negotiations, Golob ultimately failed to cobble together a viable liberal-led coalition, clearing the way for Jansa to step in and build his own right-wing government.

    The latest electoral process has been mired in controversy from the start, with widespread allegations of foreign interference and corrupt campaign practices. The Alpine nation, which has a total voting population of just 1.7 million, remains deeply politically split between liberal and conservative factions, a divide that is expected to shape the new government’s term in office.

  • Son of Mango boss arrested over father’s fatal fall from cliff

    Son of Mango boss arrested over father’s fatal fall from cliff

    Catalan law enforcement officials have taken 43-year-old Jonathan Andic, son of deceased Mango founder Isak Andic, into custody as part of a reinvestigation into the 2024 death of the global fashion industry icon. The detainment, which took place at Andic’s residence shortly after 11 a.m. local time on Tuesday, marks a major new development in a case that was originally ruled an accidental death before being reopened amid inconsistencies in testimony.

    Isak Andic, a 71-year-old Turkish-born business magnate who built Mango into one of the world’s largest fast fashion chains, lost his life in December 2024 after falling into a ravine during a hiking trip in the Montserrat mountain range outside Barcelona. Conflicting public reports have emerged over the years about who was present during the outing, with initial accounts placing only Isak and Jonathan together on the trail, while other claims note additional family members were in the area.

    Shortly after the incident, Catalan investigators closed the case in early 2025, concluding their initial review found no evidence of criminal conduct connected to Isak’s death. But per reporting from Spanish daily newspaper La Vanguardia, authorities made the decision to reopen the probe later that year after identifying unresolved discrepancies in statements Jonathan Andic provided to investigators.

    Jonathan Andic, who joined the Mango executive team in 2005, went on to lead the brand’s popular Mango Men menswear line before ascending to the position of vice-chairman of the company’s board of directors following his father’s death. He has repeatedly maintained that he bears no responsibility for the tycoon’s death. A representative for the Andic family confirmed to Reuters that Jonathan was undergoing formal police questioning following his detainment, and emphasized the family holds unwavering confidence that he will be cleared of any wrongdoing. Following his questioning, local reports indicate Andic was scheduled to appear before a judge in a Catalan court later the same day.

    Isak Andic co-founded Mango in 1984 alongside his brother Nahman, launching the brand from its first Barcelona storefront into a global retail powerhouse. Today, the fashion chain operates nearly 3,000 retail locations across 120 countries around the world. At the time of his passing, Forbes calculated Isak Andic’s personal net worth at approximately $4.5 billion (equal to around £3.6 billion).

    Following Isak’s death in 2024, Mango Chief Executive Officer Toni Ruiz released a statement honoring the brand’s founder, noting that his passing would leave an enormous gap across the company. “All of us are, in some way, his legacy and the testimony of his achievements,” Ruiz said at the time. “It is up to us, and this is the best tribute we can make to Isak and which we will fulfil, to ensure that Mango continues to be the project that Isak aspired to and of which he would feel proud.”

  • Father-of-8 security guard hailed as hero in San Diego mosque shooting

    Father-of-8 security guard hailed as hero in San Diego mosque shooting

    A devastating shooting attack at the Islamic Center of San Diego has left three community members dead, including a long-serving security guard hailed as a hero for actions that authorities confirm saved countless lives. In the wake of the Monday violence, investigators have confirmed the attack is being probed as a hate crime, with evidence linking the assailants to harmful hate rhetoric.

    The fallen security guard has been identified as Amin Abdullah, an 88-year-old father of eight who had served the San Diego mosque community for more than a decade, according to Tazheen Nizam, spokesperson for the Council on American-Islamic Relations-San Diego (CAIR-SD). Speaking at an official press conference hours after the attack, San Diego Police Chief Scott Wahl called Abdullah’s actions unequivocally heroic, emphasizing that his quick, brave response prevented an even higher death toll. “Undoubtedly, he saved lives today,” Wahl stated.

    Joining Abdullah in the fatal casualties were two other mosque community members, named by CAIR-SD as Mansour Kaziha and Nader Awad. The two attackers, a 17-year-old and an 18-year-old who have not yet been publicly identified, died from self-inflicted gunshot wounds shortly after the shooting, located in a vehicle just a few blocks from the mosque.

    The timeline of the tragedy began earlier Monday, when the mother of one of the teenage attackers contacted local police to report her son had run away with a friend and was potentially suicidal. As law enforcement launched a citywide search for the pair, officers discovered the three gunshot victims outside the mosque grounds hours later. Within minutes of that discovery, they located the two deceased suspects nearby.

    Friends and community members who knew Abdullah have paid tribute to his lifelong commitment to serving others. Shaykh Uthman Ibn Farooq, a family friend, told the Associated Press that Abdullah intentionally took on the security guard role specifically to protect innocent community members. Sam Hamideh, who knew Abdullah through mosque activities, told CBS News, the BBC’s US partner, that Abdullah’s kindness extended to everyone who crossed his path. “It didn’t matter who walked up… any random person could just walk up and, [Abdullah] would greet them, make sure they are OK,” Hamideh said. “Whether they were homeless off the street looking for something, whether it was a child or elderly.”

    Tributes have poured in across social media, with dozens of community members describing Abdullah as “the nicest man you’ll ever meet.” In an official statement released after the attack, the Islamic Center of San Diego honored his sacrifice, saying: “[He was] a courageous man who put himself on the line for the safety of others, who even in his last moments did not stop protecting our community.”

    Chief Wahl confirmed that investigators have already uncovered ties to hate rhetoric tied to the attack, confirming the case will move forward as a formal hate crime investigation.

  • France says G7 finance talks ‘frank, sometimes difficult’

    France says G7 finance talks ‘frank, sometimes difficult’

    Against a backdrop of escalating geopolitical tension and mounting economic instability, finance leaders from the Group of Seven major global economies wrapped up two days of talks in Paris on Tuesday, leaving French officials acknowledging that negotiations were marked by candid, at times strained, exchanges before the bloc agreed to a unified statement reaffirming commitment to multilateral collaboration.\n\nRoland Lescure, France’s finance minister, told reporters following the closed-door meetings that delegates engaged in open, unvarnished discussions to craft both immediate and long-term policy responses to pressing global economic challenges, with the core goal of safeguarding broad-based economic stability. The gathering included top finance officials from all G7 members, among them United States Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.\n\nDespite the friction in talks, the G7’s final official communique reaffirmed the bloc’s core pledge to work together through multilateral frameworks to counter growing risks threatening the interconnected global economy. The document framed current global conditions as a series of overlapping, complex challenges that demand coordinated policy action, pointing specifically to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East as a key driver of heightened economic uncertainty.\n\nIn the communique, G7 leaders noted that the Middle Eastern conflict has amplified existing risks to both global growth and persistent inflation, with cascading disruptions hitting critical global supply chains. The statement specifically called out acute pressures on energy, food, and fertilizer supply networks — disruptions that disproportionately harm low-income and vulnerable developing economies that rely heavily on global imports.\n\nOne of the most pressing geopolitical economic issues addressed was the persistent disruption to global shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical strategic waterway that carries roughly a fifth of the world’s daily oil trade. Since the escalation of regional conflict, Iran has implemented an effective blockade that has severely restricted shipping traffic through the strait. The G7 statement called for an immediate end to the disruption, urging a “swift return to free and safe transit” for all commercial vessels.\n\nThis week’s meeting in the French capital was held as France holds the rotating G7 presidency, and it served as a key preparatory step for the group’s full head-of-state summit scheduled for June 2025. That higher-level gathering will be hosted at the Alpine lakeside resort of Evian, with French President Emmanuel Macron set to chair the proceedings, and U.S. President Donald Trump expected to attend in person.

  • Ronaldo, 41, leads Portugal into his sixth World Cup

    Ronaldo, 41, leads Portugal into his sixth World Cup

    At 41 years old, global football icon Cristiano Ronaldo has cemented another legendary milestone in his decades-long career, earning a selection to Portugal’s 27-man squad for the 2026 FIFA World Cup this summer. The announcement, made by Portuguese head coach Roberto Martinez on Tuesday, paves the way for Ronaldo to compete at a record-breaking sixth World Cup — a feat few players in the history of the sport have ever come close to achieving.\n\nCurrently plying his trade with Saudi Pro League side Al-Nassr following stints at European giants Real Madrid and Manchester United, Ronaldo brings unmatched experience and goal-scoring pedigree to the Portuguese squad. As the all-time leading men’s international goalscorer with 143 goals to his name, the veteran striker has one major trophy missing from his extensive collection: a World Cup title. Ronaldo and Portugal have never advanced past the semi-final stage of the competition, leaving the five-time Ballon d’Or winner hungry to claim the sport’s biggest prize in what will likely be his final World Cup appearance.\n\nA storyline that has already captured global football fans’ attention is the potential reunion on the world’s biggest stage with Ronaldo’s long-time rival Lionel Messi. The Argentine great, who led his country to World Cup glory in Qatar 2022, is also set to compete at his sixth World Cup this summer, setting up the possibility of one more head-to-head clash between the two greatest players of their generation.\n\nRonaldo’s inclusion in the squad came as a mild surprise to some, after he was sent off for an elbowing incident in Portugal’s final qualifying match against the Republic of Ireland. The forward avoided a three-match suspension that would have ruled him out of the opening stage of the tournament, clearing his path to make history.\n\nCoach Martinez’s final 27-man selection held few major shocks outside of Ronaldo’s cleared suspension, with most of the nation’s top talent included in the roster. Joao Felix, Ronaldo’s teammate at Al-Nassr, earned a call-up, as did four Paris Saint-Germain stars: Vitinha, Joao Neves, Nuno Mendes and Goncalo Ramos. Manchester United’s creative playmaker Bruno Fernandes also made the cut, alongside Manchester City’s Bernardo Silva and Ruben Dias, who form a solid core of Premier League-based talent.\n\nIn terms of pre-tournament preparation, Portugal will warm up for the World Cup with friendly fixtures against Chile and Nigeria before kicking off their official campaign against DR Congo on June 17. After the opening match, Portugal will face Uzbekistan in Group K on June 23, before wrapping up their group stage play against Colombia four days later on June 27.\n\nThe full 27-man squad includes four goalkeepers: Diogo Costa of Porto, Jose Sa of England’s Wolverhampton Wanderers, Rui Silva of Sporting Lisbon, and Ricardo Velho of Turkey’s Genclerbirligi. The defensive line-up features Diogo Dalot and Jonny Evans of Manchester United, Ruben Dias and Matheus Nunes of Manchester City, Nelson Semedo of Turkey’s Fenerbahce, Joao Cancelo of Spain’s Barcelona, Nuno Mendes of France’s PSG, Goncalo Inacio of Sporting Lisbon, Renato Veiga of Spain’s Villarreal, and Tomas Araujo of Benfica. Midfielders include Ruben Neves of Saudi Arabia’s Al-Hilal, Samu Costa of Spain’s Mallorca, Joao Neves and Vitinha of PSG, Bruno Fernandes of Manchester United, and Bernardo Silva of Manchester City. The attacking corps is headlined by Ronaldo and Joao Felix of Al-Nassr, with additional options including Francisco Trincao of Sporting Lisbon, Francisco Conceicao of Italy’s Juventus, Pedro Neto of England’s Chelsea, Rafael Leao of Italy’s AC Milan, Goncalo Guedes of Spain’s Real Sociedad, and Goncalo Ramos of PSG.

  • Russia holds massive drills of its nuclear forces as Ukraine steps up its drone attacks

    Russia holds massive drills of its nuclear forces as Ukraine steps up its drone attacks

    On Tuesday, Russia initiated a sweeping, three-day set of exercises for its nuclear-capable military forces, a major show of strength that comes as Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian territory have grown dramatically in frequency and intensity in recent weeks.

    According to statements from the Russian Defense Ministry, the maneuvers are among the largest planned nuclear drills in recent years, involving a massive deployment of military hardware and personnel: 64,000 active troops, more than 200 missile launch systems, over 140 military aircraft, 73 surface warships, and 13 submarines. Eight of the participating submarines are armed with nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), putting the full scope of Russia’s sea-based nuclear deterrent on display. The drills will include live practice launches of both nuclear-capable ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, the ministry confirmed.

    The core focus of the exercises, Defense Ministry officials noted, is refining protocols for “the preparation and use of nuclear forces under the threat of aggression.” The drills also integrate joint training with Belarus, Russia’s closest western ally that already hosts Russian nuclear weapons on its territory, including the advanced new Oreshnik intermediate-range nuclear-capable missile system.

    The timing of the maneuvers is not accidental. They unfold against a backdrop of sharply escalating Ukrainian drone strikes deep inside Russian territory. Over the weekend, a large drone barrage targeted Moscow’s outlying suburbs, killing three civilians and damaging multiple residential and industrial buildings. These increasingly frequent and impactful strikes have created a growing challenge for the Kremlin, which has long attempted to frame the ongoing conflict in Ukraine as a distant operation that does not disrupt the daily lives of ordinary Russian citizens. The spread of attacks to major population centers close to the Russian capital has undermined that narrative.

    This nuclear saber-rattling aligns with a long-standing strategy Russian President Vladimir Putin has pursued since launching the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022: repeatedly drawing global attention to Russia’s massive nuclear arsenal to deter Western nations from expanding military support to Kyiv. Tuesday’s drills also kicked off on the same day that Putin began a high-profile two-day official visit to China, where he is set to reaffirm the deepening strategic partnership between Moscow and Beijing.

    Just one week before the drills, Putin publicly celebrated the successful test launch of the new Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile, a system designed to replace aging Soviet-era ICBMs and bolster Russia’s long-range nuclear strike capacity. In 2024, Putin enacted a revised Russian nuclear doctrine that significantly lowered the threshold for a potential Russian nuclear response: the document states that any conventional attack on Russia backed by a nuclear-armed power will be treated as a combined attack on the Russian state. Analysts widely view this revision as a direct warning to the West aimed at blocking Ukraine from gaining access to longer-range Western weapons that can strike deeper into Russian territory.

    Hardline Russian commentators and military hawks have long pressured the Kremlin to take harsher retaliatory action against Ukrainian drone attacks, arguing that Russia should target production facilities in NATO member European countries that supply Ukraine with drone components. Last month, the Russian Defense Ministry took an unprecedented step, publishing a public list of European factories it says are involved in manufacturing drones and parts for the Ukrainian military. The ministry issued a clear warning that any Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian territory using European-built hardware carry the risk of “unpredictable consequences” for the countries hosting those facilities, a threat that has raised tensions between Russia and the Western alliance even further.

  • NATO jet shoots down what’s believed to be a Ukrainian drone over Estonia

    NATO jet shoots down what’s believed to be a Ukrainian drone over Estonia

    On Tuesday, a NATO air policing F-16 fighter jet operated by Romania intercepted and shot down an unidentified aerial object later confirmed to most likely be a Ukrainian drone over southern Estonia, according to Estonian national authorities, intensifying already simmering cross-border tensions tied to Ukraine’s expanding long-range drone campaign against Russia.

    Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur told the Associated Press that the decision to engage the drone was based on its observed flight path, adding that preliminary assessments indicate the unmanned aircraft was originally intended to strike a target inside Russian territory. This incident marks the latest in a growing series of accidental incursions into NATO territory by Ukrainian drones targeting Russia, a pattern Western officials broadly attribute to extensive Russian electronic jamming operations that alter the course of incoming unmanned weapons.

    In the wake of the incident, Ukraine issued a formal apology for the unintended incursion. Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi announced via a post on X that Ukraine apologizes to Estonia and all Baltic allies for the accidental incident, adding that joint expert teams from Ukraine and Estonia are already developing new protocols to prevent similar events from occurring in the future. Pevkur confirmed that Estonian officials have repeatedly urged Ukraine to adjust flight trajectories for drone strikes on Russia to keep them as far from NATO territory as possible.

    Russia has seized on the incident to issue stark warnings of retaliation. The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) claimed in a Tuesday statement that Ukraine is preparing to launch drone strikes against Russian targets from the territory of Baltic NATO member states, alleging that Ukrainian military personnel have already deployed to Latvia. The statement warned that NATO membership would not shield Baltic states from what it called “just retribution”, noting that modern intelligence systems can accurately pinpoint the origin of any drone launch.

    Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs immediately refuted Russia’s claims, posting on X that Moscow’s assertions about Latvia allowing third parties to use its territory or airspace for attacks on Russia are entirely false. Tensions around stray drone incursions have already had concrete political fallout in the region: just last week, the entire Latvian government collapsed after Prime Minister Krišjānis Kariņš resigned, triggered when the defense minister was forced to step down over his handling of multiple suspected Ukrainian drone incidents and his party pulled out of the ruling coalition.

    While Estonia reaffirmed its unwavering support for Ukraine’s right to defend itself against Russian invasion, it also moved quickly to clarify its position on cross-border operations. Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna stated in an official release that Ukraine retains full legitimate right to target Russian military assets, but emphasized that Estonia has never granted permission for its airspace to be used for offensive strikes against Russia. Echoing the assessment of other Western officials, Tsahkna tied the accidental incursion directly to Russian electronic jamming efforts that divert Ukrainian drones off their intended courses.

    The downing comes amid a steady escalation of Ukraine’s long-range drone campaign against Russian infrastructure. As Ukraine’s domestic drone production capacity and technical sophistication have improved in recent months, Kyiv has ramped up strikes on key Russian energy facilities and military arms factories located hundreds of miles inside Russian territory. Just two days before the Estonia incident, Russian authorities reported that one of the largest Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian soil killed at least four people, three of them in areas surrounding Moscow, and wounded a dozen more.

    Long-range drone attacks have become a defining feature of the Russia-Ukraine war, now entering its fifth year since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. For NATO member Baltic states, which have been among the most vocal supporters of Ukraine’s war effort, these accidental incursions have created a tricky diplomatic and security balancing act, stoking internal political tensions while drawing aggressive saber-rattling from Moscow.

  • Animal welfare groups say 3 South African zoo elephants are depressed and sue to move them

    Animal welfare groups say 3 South African zoo elephants are depressed and sue to move them

    A landmark legal battle over the mental health of three captive elephants at Johannesburg’s public zoo is set to get a court hearing this week, pitting leading animal welfare advocates against city authorities in a case that could reshape animal protection standards across South Africa.

    The dispute centers on three elephants — Lammie, Ramadiba and Mopane — held in the zoo’s enclosure. Animal welfare groups, including Animal Law Reform South Africa, argue that the confined space and lack of species-appropriate stimulation have left the animals clinically depressed, and they are demanding the elephants be transferred to a larger, semi-wild conservation park where their complex biological and social needs can be met.

    David Bilchitz, board member of Animal Law Reform South Africa, one of the lead petitioners in the case, explained that the legal challenge focuses on whether South African state authorities are fulfilling their constitutional obligations to protect animal welfare. A core plank of the petitioners’ argument draws on a clause in South Africa’s Constitution that explicitly imposes a duty on governing bodies to safeguard animal well-being, and expert witnesses are set to testify in court to confirm the elephants’ poor psychological state.

    Unlike their wild counterparts, who naturally live in large herds of 20 to 50 individuals and roam across vast expanses of terrain, the three zoo elephants are confined to an enclosure only slightly larger than a standard soccer pitch. Bilchitz noted the space lacks key features elephants require for natural foraging and stimulation, including mature trees to feed on and mud pools to bathe in.

    “There is no doubt these animals are sad, depressed and deeply frustrated,” Bilchitz told the Associated Press. “They spend their days listless, standing around with nothing to engage them, and they’ve developed clear signs of psychological distress: repetitive rocking movements and other compulsive behaviors that are well-documented indicators of poor mental health in captive elephants.”

    Officials at the publicly owned Johannesburg Zoo have pushed back against the claims, defending their care of the three animals. In an official statement, the zoo argued that coverage of the elephants’ condition has amounted to a “media scourge,” maintaining that the trio are in good physical health, well cared for by staff, and remain a popular attraction for visitors. The institution also warned that relocating captive elephants to semi-wild sanctuaries does not always result in positive outcomes for the animals.

    The case is not entirely without precedent in South Africa. In 2024, an elderly bull elephant named Charley was successfully moved from another South African zoo to an extensive game reserve following advocacy from animal welfare groups. Charley had outlived all his herd mates in captivity, after spending 16 years performing in a circus, and experts confirmed he was suffering from profound loneliness. The zoo ultimately agreed to the relocation, allowing Charley to spend his final years in retirement in a more natural environment.

    The outcome of this new case could set a transformative legal precedent for animal welfare regulation across South Africa, testing the scope of constitutional protections for animals kept in captivity and potentially forcing a re-evaluation of housing conditions for elephants and other large wild animals in the country’s public and private zoos.

  • Honduran ex-president controversially pardoned by Trump speaks to BBC

    Honduran ex-president controversially pardoned by Trump speaks to BBC

    Just one month before U.S. special forces removed Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro from power, a starkly different outcome played out for another former Latin American head of state: Juan Orlando Hernández, ex-president of Honduras, who had been convicted on nearly identical drug trafficking charges, walked free after receiving a full presidential pardon from former U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Hernández had spent nearly four years behind bars at West Virginia’s maximum-security Hazelton Federal Correctional Institution, serving a 45-year sentence for his 2024 conviction on conspiracy charges linked to a transnational cocaine trafficking ring that moved 400 tonnes of the drug into the United States. Trump announced the pardon on his Truth Social platform on November 28, just 48 hours before Honduras’ general election. In the same post, Trump threatened to cut U.S. aid to Honduras unless his preferred candidate – Nasry Asfura of Hernández’s conservative National Party – won office. After a tightly contested race and delayed vote count, Asfura ultimately claimed victory.

    In an exclusive interview with the BBC from his current residence in the U.S., Hernández described his sudden release as an extraordinary turnaround, saying he is “thankful and just trying to rebuild my life” after half a decade of incarceration. He has forcefully rejected claims that the pardon was granted for political reasons, aligned with Trump’s long-stated regional policy rooted in a reinterpretation of the Monroe Doctrine, which frames the Americas as Washington’s exclusive sphere of influence.

    Most notably, Hernández pushed back hard against comparisons between his case and that of Maduro. Both right- and left-leaning sitting presidents were ultimately accused of large-scale drug trafficking, but Hernández secured Trump’s backing while Maduro faced forced removal. “My case is completely different,” he insisted, arguing that the entire criminal narrative around him was constructed by “leftist politicians in Honduras in tandem with left-wing politicians in Venezuela.” He claims upcoming evidence in Maduro’s upcoming U.S. drug trial will reveal that corrupt, drug-linked connections actually lie with members of Honduras’ left-wing Libre party, not his conservative administration.

    The pardon granted Hernández unconditional legal clearance for all the charges he was convicted of, leading the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss his pending appeal as moot, since the conviction no longer carried legal weight. The Trump administration has framed the pardon as a correction of what it calls a wrongful prosecution carried out under the Joe Biden administration.

    But for many Hondurans, the pardon does nothing to change their view of Hernández, who remains the most controversial Honduran president in recent memory, and was extradited to the U.S. in shackles to face trial. The decision sparked widespread protests both among Honduran communities in the U.S. and across Honduras, with demonstrators gathering outside the U.S. embassy in Tegucigalpa to condemn the move. “It’s a mockery for Honduras. This country doesn’t deserve that,” one local resident told Honduran television at the time.

    At Hernández’s 2024 sentencing, U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel branded him a “two-faced politician” who leveraged his presidential authority and Honduras’ national security forces to protect drug traffickers who bribed his administration and funded his political career. Prosecutors alleged he turned Honduras into a narco-state, a particularly notable charge given the country’s long-standing role as a key transit point for South American cocaine bound for U.S. consumers.

    Hernández has repeatedly denied all charges, pointing to a extradition law passed by his own administration – the same law that allowed his extradition to the U.S. for trial – as proof of his commitment to combating drug trafficking. He claims the law angered traffickers who ultimately coordinated to testify against him in retaliation.

    Among the most damning evidence introduced at trial was an alleged quote attributed to Hernández, in which he reportedly told a senior Honduran trafficker: “We’re going to shove the drugs right up the noses of the gringos.” Prosecutors also claimed he accepted a $1 million bribe from infamous Mexican drug lord Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán. Pressed on these claims, Hernández dismissed them as “false and ridiculous,” noting that El Chapo was already known to U.S. law enforcement at the time of the alleged meeting and was never in Honduras. “If you look at El Chapo’s trial, he doesn’t even mention Juan Orlando Hernández,” he told the BBC.

    He also rejected another key piece of prosecution evidence: handwritten ledger entries from a major Honduran trafficker that purportedly documented bribes paid to both him and his younger brother, Tony Hernández, a former Honduran congressman who is currently serving a life sentence in the U.S. for drug trafficking. Tony Hernández’s conviction two years before his brother’s trial was a core part of the prosecution’s case against Juan Orlando; Tony was secretly recorded meeting with a top Honduran trafficker, who later testified against both siblings, alleging a $250,000 bribe was paid for protection while Juan Orlando was running for president. When asked what Tony was doing at that meeting, Hernández acknowledged: “I ask myself the same question, it was a grave mistake.”

    Hernández has framed the entire case against him as a “political operation” built on the testimony of witnesses motivated by revenge, reduced sentences and entry into witness protection programs. He claims the prosecution was backed by an international alliance of left-wing politicians, including Democratic leaders in Washington, targeting him as a conservative leader. He and his family echo Trump’s description of the case as a “horrible witch-hunt” carried out by a politicized Biden-era Department of Justice, arguing the pardon merely corrected a gross injustice.

    However, multiple current and former officials from the Department of Justice, State Department and Drug Enforcement Administration who worked on the case told the BBC their investigation was conducted with full due process and no improper political interference. They emphasized that the investigation into Hernández began during Trump’s first term, and was not a Biden administration initiative. Ana María Méndez Dardón, Central America director at the Washington Office on Latin America research organization, confirmed the years-long investigation was built on solid evidence. “The conviction had strong evidence that supported finding Juan Orlando Hernández guilty as a drug trafficker,” she said. “There were many witnesses which exposed linkages with other transnational drug organisations, including El Chapo Guzmán. It was huge. And it goes beyond Juan Orlando Hernández as a former president and a former convicted drug trafficker.”

    Five months after his release, Hernández has still not been reunited with his family in person. He remains facing outstanding corruption and misappropriation of state funds charges in Honduras, and his wife Ana García Carías has been subject to U.S. visa restrictions since his 2020 arrest. Hernández says his top priority is securing permission to return to Honduras to be with his family, and he has ruled out any return to politics: “I’m not interested [in returning to politics]. My interest is in my family. I’ll never get back those four years I lost. Even today, I still haven’t seen them.” With his former National Party colleagues back in power in Tegucigalpa, however, Hernández is growing increasingly hopeful he will be allowed to return home. If he does, he will face the massive challenge of convincing the Honduran public, many of whom are frustrated by corrupt political elites avoiding accountability, of his version of events.

  • Israeli forces intercept the remaining activist flotilla vessels headed for Gaza

    Israeli forces intercept the remaining activist flotilla vessels headed for Gaza

    In a major escalation of tensions over Israel’s two-decade blockade of the Gaza Strip, Israeli military forces completed the interception of all remaining vessels from the Global Sumud Flotilla, an international activist mission organized to challenge the long-running naval closure and draw attention to the catastrophic humanitarian crisis facing Gaza’s nearly 2 million residents. The interdiction, carried out in international waters hundreds of kilometers off Gaza’s Mediterranean coast, has triggered widespread international condemnation and sharp diplomatic divisions over the operation.

    The flotilla, which departed from Turkish ports last week, launched the multi-vessel mission to draw global attention to severe shortages of basic necessities in Gaza, including housing, food, and life-saving medical supplies. Israeli forces began halting flotilla vessels roughly 268 kilometers from Gaza’s coastline on Monday, when they intercepted and detained crews from approximately 41 boats off the coast of Cyprus. By Tuesday, all remaining vessels had been stopped.

    Live streaming footage broadcast on the Global Sumud Flotilla’s official website showed armed Israeli soldiers boarding detained vessels, with unarmed activists wearing life vests complying by raising their hands. Soldiers proceeded to disable and destroy cameras mounted on the boats to document the mission. Flotilla organizers allege that Israeli troops fired rubber bullets at five of the intercepted boats, causing material damage to the vessels. The incident prompted Italy’s Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani to call for an urgent investigation into Israel’s use of force during the operation.

    In the aftermath of the interceptions, the Global Sumud Flotilla confirmed that hundreds of activists from more than 40 countries are being forcibly transported by Israeli vessels to an undisclosed port. The detained cohort includes more than a dozen Irish citizens, among them the sister of Irish President Catherine Connolly. Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin has publicly condemned the interception of civilian boats in international waters as “absolutely unacceptable.”

    The activist organization has issued urgent warnings about the well-being of detained crew members, pointing to testimonies from activists held during an earlier Israeli interception of a Gaza aid mission on April 30. Those accounts detailed repeated patterns of torture, severe physical abuse, and invasive sexual violence inflicted by Israeli forces during detention – allegations that Israeli officials have outright denied. The flotilla is demanding the immediate, unconditional release of all its detained participants, alongside the liberation of more than 9,000 Palestinian political prisoners held by Israel, and has called on global leaders to pressure Israel to meet these demands.

    International reaction to the interception has been deeply divided. Turkey and the Palestinian group Hamas have labeled the operation an act of open piracy in international waters. Italy, Spain, and Indonesia have all joined calls for Israel to immediately release all detained activists and guarantee their physical safety. In contrast, the U.S. Treasury Department has announced new sanctions against four European activists who were aboard the flotilla, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent characterizing the mission’s participants as “pro-terror.”

    Israeli officials have dismissed the entire flotilla initiative as “a provocation for the sake of provocation,” arguing that the vessels carried only a symbolic amount of aid and had no genuine intention of delivering humanitarian assistance to Gaza. The Israeli defense body that oversees humanitarian access to Gaza claims that sufficient aid is already entering the territory, noting that around 600 trucks of assistance cross into Gaza daily, a volume it says matches pre-war levels. However, this official account directly contradicts data published by the United Nations World Food Programme, which recorded a dramatic drop in humanitarian and commercial truck entries into Gaza during March, following the outbreak of conflict between Israel and Iran. The WFP data shows an average of only 112 trucks entered Gaza per day that month.

    One Italian activist, Daniele Gallina, avoided detention after he and six other crew members diverted their sailboat to a Cypriot port due to unplanned technical issues. In an interview with the Associated Press, Gallina emphasized that the mission’s purpose extended far beyond delivering aid. “What matters is not only the aid itself, important as it is, but the structural change it represents. It is also about challenging the collaboration of our own governments with these policies,” he said. Gallina rejected Israeli claims that the flotilla was a provocative act, noting that the entire mission was “entirely pacifist” and carried no weapons. He added that Israel’s response to the civilian mission underscores the open disregard for international law targeting peaceful humanitarian efforts. Despite the interception of the entire flotilla, Gallina said activists remain fully determined to continue their campaign “until Gaza is reached.”

    Background to the current confrontation dates back nearly 20 years. Israel imposed a naval blockade on Gaza after Hamas took control of the territory in 2007, and significantly tightened the restriction following the October 7, 2023, attacks led by Hamas on southern Israel that killed approximately 1,200 people and saw more than 250 people taken hostage. Israeli authorities justify the blockade as a necessary security measure to prevent weapons from reaching Hamas. Critics across the globe argue that the blockade amounts to unlawful collective punishment of Gaza’s entire civilian population. Egypt, which controls the only land border crossing into Gaza not administered by Israel, has also imposed severe restrictions on movement in and out of the territory.

    According to Gaza’s Ministry of Health, which is run by Hamas but staffed by medical professionals whose detailed casualty records are widely viewed as reliable by the international community, Israel’s retaliatory military offensive in Gaza has killed more than 72,700 people since the offensive began. The ministry does not publish a breakdown of casualties between civilians and combatants. The latest interception comes as global attention remains focused on efforts to secure a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, following months of devastating conflict.

    The report was filed from Nicosia, Cyprus, by correspondent Hadjicostis, with additional reporting contributions from Associated Press journalists Suzan Fraser in Ankara, Turkey, Derek Gatopoulos in Athens, Greece, Giada Zampano in Rome, and Fatima Hussein in Washington, D.C.