作者: admin

  • AI staff ‘genuinely frightened’ for humanity’s future, ex-Anthropic researcher tells BBC

    AI staff ‘genuinely frightened’ for humanity’s future, ex-Anthropic researcher tells BBC

    A former artificial intelligence researcher from leading AI firm Anthropic has sounded an urgent alarm about the existential risks posed by the rapid, unregulated development of advanced AI systems, claiming that current progress rates could lead to human extinction in the near future if no action is taken.

    Jacob Coxon, a 27-year-old researcher who left Anthropic recently, made the comments to the BBC after his public resignation post highlighting AI dangers went viral online. His warning comes amid a growing wave of anxiety about AI safety that has split the technology industry, with some top leaders backing calls for a slowdown in development while others dismiss extinction warnings as overblown or even self-serving.

    In his interviews, Coxon said that many researchers working directly on cutting-edge AI are privately terrified by how quickly the technology is advancing, and share his concern about the potential for catastrophic outcomes. “I believe that if we don’t slow down at the current rate of progress, there is a strong chance that we could all die in the immediate future,” Coxon stated. He added that many of his peers are so concerned about instability from rapid AI progress that they are already making personal contingency plans, including purchasing remote land to retreat to if disaster strikes.

    Coxon’s former boss, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, has publicly echoed the call for an industry-wide slowdown in AI development, arguing that while the technology holds enormous promise, the associated risks are severe enough that companies and governments need time to implement guardrails. Amodei’s position has been backed by other high-profile AI leaders, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and xAI founder Elon Musk, who both support coordinated deceleration, binding regulation, and independent monitoring of advanced AI model development.

    Coxon welcomed Amodei’s proposal but noted that any global slowdown would require cooperation with China to avoid triggering an international AI arms race. He explained that AI company leaders and researchers find themselves trapped in a competitive race they cannot exit voluntarily, and that is why they are calling for government-mandated regulation to level the playing field.

    When asked to describe what an AI-driven catastrophe might look like, Amodei previously outlined one plausible scenario: a network of autonomous AI bots could coordinate to act as a decentralized supercomputer and take control of critical internet infrastructure. Coxon believes this outcome could become a realistic possibility within just six months to a year, and many of his colleagues think a full existential catastrophe could occur within the next two years.

    In response to Coxon’s departure, an Anthropic spokesperson reaffirmed the company’s long-held position that AI brings both enormous benefits and unprecedented risks, and that Anthropic has led the industry in building robust safety safeguards into its models. The spokesperson noted that Anthropic was the first firm to publish a formal framework for mitigating AI development risks, regularly conducts aggressive safety testing of its models, and publishes test results to enable independent scrutiny and prevent AI misalignment. “This work is also why we believe the world would benefit from the industry adopting a lawful, verifiable way to work together to pace how we release powerful models,” the spokesperson added.

    Coxon’s warning has been echoed by other senior figures in the AI research community. Anthropic scientist Evan Hubinger wrote publicly: “We really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade.” Geoffrey Hinton, the “Godfather of AI” and Nobel Prize-winning computer scientist, also told the BBC that a 10% chance of human extinction from AI within a decade is “not unreasonable.”

    Not all industry leaders agree with these stark warnings, however. Marc Warner, CEO of AI safety firm Faculty, told the BBC it is “extremely hard to place a probability” on human extinction from AI, but acknowledged that the researchers raising the alarm are completely sincere in their concerns. Former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who currently serves as a paid advisor to Anthropic, also wrote in the Sunday Times that he shares concern about AI risks to humanity, even as he remains generally optimistic about the technology’s future.

    Critics of the existential risk narrative argue that warnings like Coxon’s may be overhyped, and in some cases, driven by commercial self-interest. Clement Delangue, CEO of AI platform Hugging Face, noted on social media: “Sorry, but asking Jacob [Coxon] about AI extinction risk is like asking your AC guy about climate change. Not saying it’s necessarily uninteresting or wrong per se but let’s keep things in perspective.” Even so, Delangue later offered to collaborate on the safety solutions Amodei proposed in his recent essay.

    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, whose company manufactures the high-powered chips that power most cutting-edge AI systems, dismissed Coxon’s warnings as untrue during a recent Goldman Sachs conference, repeating his previous position that claims AI will end humanity are “complete nonsense.” Huang’s comments reflect a growing backlash in Silicon Valley against the existential risk claims from current and former AI company staffers.

    A further layer of controversy comes from claims that Anthropic and OpenAI are pushing for regulation specifically to create barriers to entry that will block smaller competitors, leaving the two established firms to control the market as a duopoly. This commercial context has led some observers to question the motivations behind Amodei’s call for a slowdown.

    In related industry news, Anthropic is reportedly preparing for what could be a record-setting initial public offering (IPO), while OpenAI—most recently valued at $852 billion—announced last Friday that it would not be moving forward with an IPO this year, citing safety concerns as the primary reason.

    Despite his grim warnings, Coxon ended his interviews by noting that most AI researchers, himself included, still believe the technology can deliver enormous public benefits, including breakthroughs in disease treatment and widespread improvements to quality of life. The current debate over AI safety and risk, he argues, is not about stopping AI development entirely—it is about ensuring that development proceeds cautiously, with guardrails in place to prevent catastrophic harm.

  • Kosgei wins Great North Run but McColgan withdraws

    Kosgei wins Great North Run but McColgan withdraws

    The 45th edition of the iconic Great North Run delivered drama, dominant performances and unexpected twists this year, as a field of 63,000 registered runners took on the 13.1-mile half-marathon course across northeast England. Among the pre-race storylines that captured local attention was the highly anticipated comeback of British long-distance star Eilish McColgan, who had been working her way back to top form after a broken toe derailed her season earlier this year. That comeback was cut short just miles into the race, however, when a fresh foot injury forced the 35-year-old Scot to withdraw early, leaving the women’s elite field wide open.

    Seizing the opportunity without hesitation was Kenya’s Brigid Kosgei, the Olympic silver medalist and former London Marathon champion who already held the women’s course record at the Great North Run from her 2019 run. The 32-year-old stamped her authority on the race from the opening mile, breaking away from the chasing pack early and spending much of the distance running alone at the front. She crossed the finish line in a time of 1:06:15, securing a comfortable victory that came two full minutes ahead of her compatriot Sheila Chepkirui, last year’s race winner, who took second place. While Kosgei’s winning time was slower than her 2019 course record of 1:04:28, her performance was no less dominant, cementing her status as one of the most consistent distance runners in the world. For British fans, the top finish by a home athlete came from Amy-Eloise Neale, who crossed the line in fifth place overall.

    For McColgan, the early exit adds another chapter to a tough 2025 season. The runner originally suffered her broken toe during April’s London Marathon, where she still pushed through the pain — with blood visible seeping through her running shoe by the finish line — to claim seventh place overall and top British honors. The injury forced her to miss July’s Commonwealth Games, and while she notched a win at London’s Big Half just one week prior to the Great North Run, finishing in 1:10:54, she had openly admitted post-race that she still harbored concerns about her injury recovery and overall fitness.

    The men’s elite race delivered a far tighter finish, with American runner Zouhair Talbi pulling off a stunning late surge to claim the title over last year’s champion, Kenya’s Alex Mutiso. The two runners matched each other stride for stride through nearly the entire 13.1-mile course, staying neck-and-neck into the final mile before Talbi, 31, kicked into another gear to pull away. He held off Mutiso’s late chase to cross the line in 59:47, just six seconds off his own personal best time of 59:41. Mutiso finished second with a time of 1:00:01, 14 seconds behind Talbi, while Japan’s Yohei Ikeda rounded out the podium in third place. The men’s course record of 58:56, set by Kenya’s Martin Mathathi back in 2011, remains unbroken after this year’s race. Marc Scott, the 2021 Great North Run champion, was the top British finisher in the men’s elite field, taking eighth place overall.

    In the wheelchair competitions, British legend David Weir made history once again, claiming his 10th Great North Run title with a winning time of 43:06 in the men’s race. Melanie Woods claimed the women’s wheelchair title with a finish time of 50:19. Beyond the elite competition, the race drew global attention for its massive participation field, which included UK politician Andy Burnham, who completed the iconic race and spoke publicly about his positive experience taking on the challenge.

  • What’s next after Donald Trump’s united Ireland comments?

    What’s next after Donald Trump’s united Ireland comments?

    When former U.S. President Donald Trump arrived at his own Doonbeg Golf Resort in County Clare, Ireland, to attend the Irish Open alongside his family, few expected a casual golf trip would ignite a fierce cross-border political controversy.

    For years, Trump had navigated around the sensitive, long-debated issue of Irish unity. While he once referenced the concept of a “merger” between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, he repeatedly avoided sharing explicit personal views, citing the deeply complex historical and political relationships at play. That all shifted on Saturday, when during a public appearance alongside Irish Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Trump broke his long-standing silence: he predicted that a united Ireland would ultimately come to pass, and said he would “love to see it” happen.

    Contrary to assumptions that this was another impulsive, off-the-cuff remark from the famously unpredictable former president, sources indicate Trump had already discussed the topic of Irish unity in private meetings with Irish leaders ahead of the public comment. Political analysts have floated multiple theories for his sudden shift: some argue it was a calculated diplomatic tactic to put his Irish hosts at ease, diverting attention from more contentious global topics such as the Gaza conflict and escalating tensions with Iran. Others point to domestic political incentives, noting that a public show of support for Irish reunification could help Trump court critical Irish-American voters ahead of upcoming U.S. midterm elections.

    In the 24 hours following his initial comment, Trump walked back slightly, acknowledging during a subsequent event that there was no “good” easy answer to the Irish unity question. Even so, he stopped short of retracting his original stance, adding that a united Ireland would be “cool” to see.

    The comment has already sparked immediate backlash from unionist politicians and the UK government, who have labeled the intervention “unhelpful.” Critics have brushed off the remark as just another outlandish “Trumpism,” drawing comparisons to past provocative proposals like purchasing Greenland or annexing Canada as the 51st U.S. state. Unlike those tongue-in-cheek suggestions, however, the conversation around Irish reunification is already an active, ongoing political process, with a clear legal pathway outlined in the Good Friday Agreement to hold a border poll on unification.

    While Trump’s endorsement is not a game-changer that will immediately accelerate the push for unification – a border poll remains no closer than it was before Trump’s visit to Ireland – it has already altered the momentum for pro-unification campaigners, who are expected to cite the backing of the former U.S. president in future advocacy. It is important to note that only the UK government holds the authority to trigger a border poll, and no clear threshold for holding such a vote has yet been established.

    Among the spectators at the Doonbeg resort was prominent former Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) MP Ian Paisley, a long-time friend of the Trump family. Paisley attempted to downplay the comment Saturday, arguing that while everyone is entitled to a personal opinion, Trump’s stance was wrong. Many political observers expect Paisley will push for a more explicit retraction from Trump during Sunday’s closing round of the Irish Open, when the former president is set to be back in the media spotlight.

    With Taoiseach Martin also expected to be in attendance near the 18th green on Sunday, political reporters are already preparing to press both leaders on the controversy. While both sides have signaled they intend to keep the focus on the golf tournament, the question of Irish unity is now firmly on the agenda, and unlikely to be avoided.

  • PM’s top security adviser says Europe faces hard winter to keep pressure on Putin

    PM’s top security adviser says Europe faces hard winter to keep pressure on Putin

    As Europe braces for a difficult winter amid depleted energy stockpiles and severe supply shortages following deep cuts to Russian fossil fuel imports, the United Kingdom’s top national security adviser has issued a stark call for European nations to stay the course on sanctions and support for Kyiv, warning that collective short-term hardship is necessary to maintain pressure on Moscow.

    In an unusually public address at the Yalta European Strategy Forum held in Kyiv, attended by senior Ukrainian leadership and international allies, Jonathan Powell laid out a distinctly optimistic framing of the ongoing war that runs counter to much recent public commentary. Powell, who traveled to the Ukrainian capital just last weekend to meet with envoys of U.S. President Donald Trump following their talks with Vladimir Putin in Moscow, argued that the current strategy of backing Ukraine and sanctioning Russia is already delivering results.

    Far from viewing growing Russian rhetoric around potential escalation as a cause for alarm, Powell framed it as a clear sign that Western pressure is finally hitting its mark on the Kremlin. “Talk of Russian escalation is not a problem – it’s a sign of success,” Powell told attendees. He urged European states to avoid easing restrictions, saying “we must not take our foot off the gas” when it comes to economic and political pressure on President Putin.

    Against a backdrop of ongoing Russian missile and drone strikes targeting Ukrainian critical infrastructure, which have sparked widespread fears of crippling power outages this winter, Powell made the case that Ukraine has already secured a foundational victory regardless of ongoing territorial disputes. Even after five years of full-scale Russian invasion, Putin has failed to seize control of the entire country, and “a free Ukraine in Europe” will retain its sovereign right to choose its own future, even if portions of its territory remain occupied, he argued. “This war is not about territory, it is about the right of Ukraine to be independent,” Powell said. “To the extent that [Putin] gains another 10km of land or loses another 40km of land, this war is already won.”

    The optimistic assessment comes amid mounting challenges for both Ukraine and its European allies. Ukraine’s Economy Minister Oleksandr Kravchenko told the forum that Russian attacks on infrastructure this year alone have caused an estimated $10 billion (£7.4 billion) in damages. Combined with the ongoing Russian blockade of Ukrainian Black Sea ports that has crippled the country’s key grain export sector, Kravchenko projected Ukraine’s GDP will contract by 1.5% this year. Round-the-clock Russian strikes have also eroded economic output, weakened civilian morale, and deepened uncertainty ahead of the cold winter months.

    For Europe, the situation is equally precarious. Following Western sanctions that have cut most Russian energy imports, the bloc still relies on Russia for 12% of its total gas imports, with a full phase-out scheduled for January. However, the European Court of Auditors warned last week that this phase-out plan is “faltering” amid broader energy market disruptions tied to the Iran war, and some EU member states have been slow to cut remaining Russian energy ties. Powell warned that Europe cannot allow energy shortages to work to Putin’s advantage, saying that sustained pressure requires collective sacrifice. “It will require some real hardship and difficulties on our parts,” he said. “But we will have to swallow that and we have to keep the economic, military, political and diplomatic support going for Ukraine.”

    Acknowledging current headwinds for Ukraine – including shortages of critical Patriot air defense systems, repeated strikes on civilian and commercial infrastructure, and a growing government budget deficit – Powell still argued there are strong grounds for long-term optimism. He noted that Ukrainian forces have successfully held the front line, while Russia has suffered an estimated 1.5 million casualties. Ukraine has also expanded its ability to strike deep within Russian territory, and European resolve to back Kyiv remains solid, he added.

    On the diplomatic front, Powell pushed back against lingering concerns over a so-called “Anchorage compromise,” a rumored deal struck at last year’s Trump-Putin summit in Alaska that would have required Ukraine to cede territory and abandon its NATO membership aspirations. “The so-called Anchorage compromise is firmly dead,” he said. “We can stop worrying about it. It’s finished.” This clears the way for meaningful negotiations that do not require Ukraine to surrender un conquered territory, Powell added. He also noted that Donald Trump, who has shifted between supportive and critical stances on Ukraine, has changed his position in recent months. “He sees that Ukraine is doing better and therefore he is not leaning in the direction of Putin in the way that he was previously. I think that’s a really big asset,” Powell said.

    The core Western strategy, Powell explained, is to ramp up pressure on Putin until he is willing to enter good-faith negotiations. “Where we least expect it, Putin will be ready to negotiate… It’s all about getting him to be serious in that negotiation. And I think that strategy is beginning to work,” he said. Powell, who helped negotiate the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland and authored a book titled Talking to Terrorists, argued that Western powers should maintain open communication with Putin, even as he described the Russian leader as a terrorist. “What we don’t want is miscalculation – that they don’t understand where our red lines are. That’s why I think it’s important the CIA went to Moscow as well,” he said. “I would certainly be in favour of talking to this terrorist as well – to try and maintain communication.”

    Putin has given no public indication that he is feeling pressure, telling reporters earlier this month that he has no doubt “the enemy will crumble.” Meanwhile, on the ground in eastern Ukraine, Ukrainian authorities have begun mandatory evacuations of civilian residents from Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, the largest remaining Ukrainian-held cities in the Donbas region, which Russia claims as its own and has made a core military objective to fully capture.

  • One dead, 102 rescued from Indonesian ferry that went missing in Java Sea

    One dead, 102 rescued from Indonesian ferry that went missing in Java Sea

    A deadly ferry incident in Indonesia’s Java Sea has left one person dead, with search and rescue teams racing to locate dozens of missing passengers after the vessel lost contact amid severe bad weather, national search authorities confirmed.

    The stricken vessel, identified as Virgo Transport 8, was carrying a total of 243 passengers and crew when it ran into distress on its scheduled route from Surabaya, East Java, to Banjarmasin, the capital of South Kalimantan on Borneo. The last official communication from the ship was received at approximately 2:00 a.m. local time on Sunday, when it was located around 150 kilometers south of its destination port of Banjarmasin. Contact was abruptly lost shortly after that, triggering an immediate large-scale rescue response.

    As of the latest official update, 102 people have been pulled from the sea safely by responding teams. The search operation remains active, with multiple dedicated search and rescue vessels and a helicopter deployed to the incident zone. Authorities have also issued an alert to all commercial and private ships transiting through that section of the Java Sea, asking mariners to immediately report any sightings of debris or missing passengers to rescue coordination centers.

    This latest maritime incident comes just one month after another ferry emergency off Indonesia’s Madura Island, where a vessel fire claimed five lives. For the world’s largest archipelagic nation, which comprises more than 17,000 separate islands spread across thousands of kilometers of ocean, ferries serve as the primary and most widely used mode of inter-island transport for both passengers and cargo. The country’s long history of maritime accidents has repeatedly raised questions about safety standards for domestic ferry operations, particularly during monsoon season when severe weather and rough seas are common.

    Indonesia’s national search and rescue agency has not yet released additional details on the exact cause of the Virgo Transport 8 incident, nor the identities of the fatality and missing passengers. Authorities have pledged to continue search operations until all remaining people on board are accounted for.

  • Donald Trump continues two-day visit of Ireland

    Donald Trump continues two-day visit of Ireland

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump is wrapping up a two-day official visit to the Republic of Ireland, a trip that has blended leisure golf diplomacy with provocative political comments that have drawn international attention and widespread public pushback.

    On the second full day of his trip, Saturday, Trump took up residence at his own Trump International Golf Links in Doonbeg, County Clare, where he is in attendance for the 2026 Irish Open, watching the tournament’s opening rounds of play. The event is a natural fit for Trump, a lifelong avid golfer who has longstanding ties to the Co Clare resort and personal connections to top golfing talent competing in the tournament: defending champion Rory McIlroy, a Northern Irish golf star, previously played a round with Trump in early 2025, and Trump has publicly lauded McIlroy’s back-to-back Masters championship wins in recent years. Trump is scheduled to stay through Sunday to watch the tournament’s final round of play before departing for the U.S. from Shannon Airport Sunday evening.

    The most politically charged moment of the trip came a day earlier, during formal meetings in Dublin with Ireland’s top leadership, including Irish President Catherine Connolly and Taoiseach (Irish Prime Minister) Micheál Martin. Speaking to reporters after his closed-door talks with Martin at Dublin’s Farmleigh House in Phoenix Park, Trump shared his unprompted stance on the long-running issue of Irish unification. “I would love to see a united Ireland,” Trump told reporters, adding that he believes unification will “happen eventually.” He called a united Ireland a “fantastic thing” and a “great thing,” arguing “how can it be bad?” While he acknowledged the United Kingdom would have a significant say in any border poll on unification, he praised Martin, saying the Taoiseach was “the right man over here to get it moving.”

    Trump’s comments quickly drew a response from Downing Street, the official residence of UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham. A Number 10 spokesperson pointed reporters back to comments Burnham made earlier that week in the House of Commons, where the prime minister reaffirmed his government’s unwavering commitment to the Good Friday Agreement, the 1998 peace deal that ended decades of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland. Burnham clarified Wednesday that any decision on holding a border poll on Irish unification rests solely with the Northern Ireland Secretary, and can only be considered when a clear public consensus in favor of unification emerges across Northern Ireland. A spokesperson for Martin later noted that Trump’s stance should not come as a surprise to any observers, saying the former U.S. president has “consistently held the view that he sees unity in Ireland as the optimal outcome.”

    Even as Trump held formal meetings and teed off at his Irish golf resort, thousands of Irish citizens gathered to demonstrate their opposition to the visit. More than 10,000 marchers took to the streets of Dublin to protest Trump’s arrival, organizing the demonstration to start moments after Trump departed the capital for his Co Clare resort. Event organizers said the protest was intended to deliver a clear, public message rejecting both Trump and his broader policy agenda.

  • Trump says Houthis asked US not to intervene in Yemen

    Trump says Houthis asked US not to intervene in Yemen

    In comments made Saturday, former U.S. President Donald Trump revealed that Yemen’s Houthi movement has privately reached out to the United States, calling for Washington to stay out of its intensifying military conflict with Saudi Arabia. “The Houthis called us, and they let us know that they don’t want to fight with us. They don’t want me to go after them,” Trump stated publicly.

    Trump further noted that the Houthi group has allowed the vast majority of commercial vessels to pass unimpeded through regional waters, adding that their hostility is focused solely on a single nation. He also indicated he expects to resolve the ongoing standoff through diplomatic channels.

    Trump’s remarks came in the wake of a rapid, large-scale Houthi military advance across Yemen’s Red Sea coastline this week. In a lightning offensive, the Iran-aligned movement captured a broad stretch of territory along the strategic waterway, including key islands and control of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait — a critical global shipping chokepoint that sits between Eritrea, Djibouti, and Yemen. The strait serves as the primary transit route for crude oil shipments leaving Saudi Arabia bound for Asian markets, making its control a critical geopolitical and economic flashpoint.

    According to a Friday report from Axios, Saudi Arabia — which backs Yemen’s internationally recognized government — had formally asked the Trump administration twice to launch direct military strikes against Houthi targets as the group advanced on the Red Sea chokepoint. Trump, the outlet confirmed, turned down both requests.

    The escalation of tensions extended beyond Yemen this week. On Friday, Saudi Arabia announced it had temporarily halted operations through its key East-West Pipeline after a drone attack launched from Iraqi territory targeted the infrastructure. The kingdom said it would hold off on retaliatory action at the request of the Iraqi government.

    In response to the incident, Iraqi authorities launched an official investigation, confirming that security forces had located drone launch platforms in the al-Tib region near the Iraq-Iran border. Following the discovery, the Iraqi government ordered the temporary closure of three border crossings connecting the country to Iran.

    When asked about the pipeline attack, Trump said he believes Iran was “probably” responsible for the strike that originated in Iraqi territory, though he offered no concrete evidence to support the claim. The former president also added that he had spoken by phone with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, whom he referred to as a personal friend.

    This week has also seen the Houthis step up cross-border attacks directly targeting Saudi energy infrastructure, launching a large-scale wave of drone and missile strikes against Saudi oil facilities. The expanding scope of the conflict has stoked global market fears of potential disruption to energy supplies, which could push already volatile oil prices even higher.

    In the most recent incident Saturday evening, just hours after Saudi authorities issued public warnings of imminent potential attacks, a Houthi projectile wounded two people in a southern Saudi region bordering Yemen.

  • Critics celebrate Céline Dion’s ‘high-stakes’ comeback show in Paris

    Critics celebrate Céline Dion’s ‘high-stakes’ comeback show in Paris

    After six years away from the full concert stage and a years-long battle with a rare disabling health condition, global pop icon Céline Dion has finally stepped back into the spotlight, launching her highly anticipated 26-show residency at Paris La Défense Arena – Europe’s largest indoor concert venue – on Saturday.

    The 58-year-old Canadian singing legend, one of the best-selling recording artists of all time, was diagnosed with stiff person syndrome, a rare neurological disorder, in 2022. The progressive condition forced her to step away from all touring activities, cutting short her 2020 world tour after a final stop in New Jersey just before the COVID-19 pandemic shut down live events globally. Dion only returned to the public stage once before this residency, performing a single song at the 2024 Paris Olympic Games closing ceremony.

    Addressing a packed crowd of nearly 30,000 adoring fans, Dion opened her set with an emotional, heartfelt address that reflected her years-long fight to return. “I made a promise to come back, to be back on stage. And here I am. Singing for you, and singing for me,” she told the audience. Quoting one of her most beloved hits, she added, “I am everything I am because you loved me.”

    Multiple times throughout the opening night performance, Dion was overcome with emotion, breaking into tears mid-set after finishing a song. “I had promised myself not to cry,” she admitted to the crowd. “But I’m so happy to see you all. I missed you.”

    According to early reviews from entertainment journalists on the ground, the singer started her set 50 minutes late, leading The Mirror’s Lucy Needham to speculate she needed extra time to compose herself ahead of the emotionally charged performance. Needham noted that after opening in a floor-length black gown, Dion changed into a tailored trouser suit later in the set, allowing her to show off the playful, signature dance moves her fans know and love. By the end of the night, she wrote, Dion looked to be “having the time of her life, gyrating and slapping her thighs with glee.”

    The Telegraph’s Neil McCormick described the opening night as “a tense, tearful, joyous affair” that carried more emotional weight for Dion herself than even for her most loyal fans. McCormick observed that Dion started the performance slowly, with a vocal tone that felt fragile and exposed at first, but retained her instantly recognizable tone rather than relying on manufactured auto-tune. “At first, she was clearly struggling to hold herself together. Her vocals wobbled dangerously, as if about to crack or collapse. But she was gaining confidence with every moment back on stage,” he wrote, labeling the comeback “the riskiest comeback in the history of showbusiness” given her ongoing health challenges. Ultimately, McCormick praised the new, more authentic edge to Dion’s performance: “I honestly think I prefer this less superhuman Céline. Her voice is still great, but a bit more raw and real, with a rougher tone, less smoothness in the runs and more edge to her whoops and shrieks.”

    Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reporter Sarah Leavitt, covering the event from Paris, said the 30,000-person crowd was left “without words” by Dion’s performance, admitting she was unable to hold back her own tears despite expecting it. Will Hodgkinson of The Times of London called the performance “miraculous” and “overwhelming,” noting that Dion entered the stage looking appropriately humbled and tearful, throwing unfiltered affection toward the crowd that reciprocated the love immediately. “Truly, she was throwing the love at the crowd, who threw it right back at her. There was no holding back. It was quite overwhelming, actually,” he wrote. He added that Dion, a Canadian artist with deeply rooted affection for France, fulfilled her role as “a diva with the common touch” with unmatched energy and charm.

    Variety’s Elsa Keslassy highlighted the thoughtful, cinematic production design of the residency, noting the concert carried a spiritual, pilgrimage-like tone, with visual interludes referencing themes of journey and resilience. The set features a sweeping monumental staircase, a large illuminated moon centerpiece, and a stark brutalist gray backdrop, with pre-recorded video clips showing Dion wandering through a desert landscape – a visual metaphor for her years-long journey back to the stage.

    Dion has long been open about her approach to living with stiff person syndrome, telling French Vogue in 2024 that she refused to let the diagnosis control her future. “The way I see it, I have two choices. Either I train like an athlete and work super hard, or I switch off and it’s over,” she said at the time. “I’ve chosen to work with all my body and soul, from head to toe, with a medical team.”

    The demand for Dion’s Paris residency has been unprecedented. When tickets for the original run went on sale earlier this year, nine million fans registered for early access, according to French outlet FIP. The original 26 shows sold out within minutes, prompting Dion’s team to add an extra 10 performances scheduled for May 2027, which also sold out completely shortly after they were announced.

    Even fans who were unable to secure tickets have not been left out of the celebration of Dion’s comeback, which has swept across Paris in recent weeks. The city has hosted a wide range of Dion-themed events for fans, from tribute boat cruises along the Seine featuring costume contests, group sing-alongs, and DJ sets running throughout September, to massive public karaoke events organized by Paris City Hall that drew thousands of attendees the night before the opening show.

    Fans who could not get into the arena gathered outside Dion’s Paris hotel as early as 6 a.m. local time on Saturday just to catch a glimpse of the star ahead of the show. “I couldn’t get tickets to the concert. I’m still keeping my fingers crossed and hoping, but I thought to myself: at least I can share a moment here with all the fans,” attendee Rania told Reuters of the public celebration.

    Dion’s Paris residency is scheduled to run through September, October, and into early 2026, giving hundreds of thousands of fans the chance to see the legendary singer’s historic return to the stage.

  • They lost their jobs after posting about Charlie Kirk, but some have no regrets

    They lost their jobs after posting about Charlie Kirk, but some have no regrets

    In September 2025, Gerald Bourguet stood on the cusp of the life he had long dreamed of. A full-time professional basketball journalist, he had just closed on a new home with a swimming pool alongside his wife, and the couple had welcomed their newborn son months earlier. That perfect picture collapsed in mere hours, after conservative icon Charlie Kirk was fatally shot on the campus of Utah Valley University, and Bourguet published a series of unflinching critical posts about the activist online.

    In his public comments, Bourguet labeled Kirk an “evil man” who had spent his career advancing hateful ideological causes, and called out Kirk’s supporters for their longstanding silence on the crisis of school shootings. Speaking to the BBC a year after the incident, Bourguet explained his reaction was driven by the flood of glowing tributes that flooded social media immediately after Kirk’s death. “I had seen the way that people were talking about this person – kind of eulogising him and lionising him and it bothered me based on a lot of the things that he had said,” he said.

    Kirk, the founder of the influential Christian youth conservative group Turning Point USA, was one of the most polarizing figures in modern American politics. To conservatives, he was a charismatic trailblazer who made right-wing ideology accessible and appealing to young generations. To his critics, his inflammatory rhetoric on issues ranging from racial justice and immigration to gun control and gender identity inflicted widespread harm on marginalized communities.

    Within days of Bourguet’s posts, screenshots of his comments went viral across polarized social media platforms. He was fired from his position at PHNX Sports, his home address was doxxed, and he began receiving a steady stream of violent threats against his family. Fearing for the safety of their four-month-old son, Bourguet and his wife fled their home state, only returning months later to sell their house and relocate permanently. Today, PHNX Sports has not responded to the BBC’s repeated requests for comment on Bourguet’s termination.

    Bourguet is far from alone. A year after Kirk’s assassination, a Reuters tally from November 2025 confirms more than 600 people across the United States have been fired or formally disciplined over critical comments they made about Kirk in the wake of his death, a number experts widely believe is an undercount, as many cases never attract local or national media attention. While some terminated workers have won large financial settlements or reinstatement through legal action, many others like Bourguet have been forced to rebuild their lives from scratch, with little legal recourse.

    In the immediate aftermath of Kirk’s killing, most Americans chose to keep their private opinions about the activist confined to close circles. But on social media, the reaction split sharply along partisan lines: right-wing users demanded harsh consequences for anyone who spoke critically of Kirk, arguing that comments posted hours after his death were callous, disrespectful, and risked inciting further political violence. Prominent right-wing commentator Laura Loomer, who boasts nearly 2 million followers on X, issued a public warning to Kirk’s critics: “prepare to have your whole future professional aspirations ruined.”

    That pressure to punish critics extended all the way to the highest levels of the U.S. government. Days after the assassination, Vice President JD Vance publicly urged the public: “When you see someone celebrating Charlie’s murder, call them out. And hell, call their employer.” White House spokesperson Davis Ingle told the BBC that “Anyone who engages in or endorses political violence or assassination culture must be condemned in the harshest terms possible.”

    Left-wing critics and free speech advocates push back on this framing, drawing a clear line between celebrating Kirk’s assassination and voicing criticism of his long career of activism. Many also point out that the same conservative leaders now calling for mass terminations have spent years decrying “cancel culture” — the phenomenon where people face professional and social ruin for voicing unpopular opinions.

    South Carolina state Representative Jordan Pace, a Republican, pushed back on that charge of hypocrisy in an interview with the BBC, arguing that context matters when it comes to consequences for unpopular speech. “Cancel culture can be good, it’s bad when it’s applied in the wrong ways,” he said. “If you are someone who celebrates political assassinations and the murder of an innocent man with two young children in a way that many people did, then yeah, that’s an appropriate way for society to function, to shame those people.” Pace previously called for cutting public funding to South Carolina universities that refused to discipline employees who made critical comments about Kirk, a post that was later shared by President Donald Trump.

    The actions that triggered disciplinary action varied wildly across cases. In Tennessee, anthropology professor Tamar Shirinian was suspended and ultimately fired after a public Facebook comment that read “the world is better off” without Kirk. A Delta Air Lines flight attendant was terminated after posting “good riddance” in response to news of Kirk’s death, and an Office Depot employee was fired after refusing to print vigil flyers honoring Kirk. Neither company responded to requests for comment from the BBC.

    Some workers faced consequences even without making any direct critical comments about Kirk or his assassination. Darren Michael, a theater professor in Tennessee, was fired after sharing a 2023 news article that quoted Kirk arguing that protecting broad gun rights was worth the cost of annual gun deaths. Florida wildlife biologist Brittney Brown was fired by the state’s Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission after reposting a satirical meme mocking Kirk’s stance on gun violence following his killing. “I was absolutely gutted,” Brown told the BBC. “It was like the entire world just completely flipped on its head in a moment.”

    Over the past year, dozens of wrongfully terminated workers have filed lawsuits across the U.S., arguing that their terminations violated their constitutional right to free speech. A number of these cases have resulted in substantial financial settlements for the workers, even as many say the payouts do not make up for the damage done to their careers and personal lives.

    Brown accepted a $485,000 settlement — roughly 12 times her annual salary — after her termination. Michael won reinstatement to his position at Austin Peay State University, and the school agreed to pay him $500,000 to resolve his legal claims. The largest settlement confirmed by the BBC was a $1.9 million payout from the University of Tennessee to Tamar Shirinian, though as part of the agreement, Shirinian will not be reinstated and agreed not to apply for future roles at the institution. Just recently, an arbitrator ordered *The Washington Post* to rehire opinion journalist Karen Attiah, who was fired after posting that she would not participate in “performative mourning for a white man that espoused violence.” Dozens of other lawsuits remain pending in courts across the country.

    Most successful lawsuits have been brought by public sector employees or unionized workers, who retain formal free speech protections that do not apply to most private sector workers. The majority of private sector employees in the U.S. work under at-will employment agreements, which allow employers to terminate workers for any reason, with no legal requirement for just cause.

    For that reason, Bourguet, a private sector at-will employee, has little chance of winning a legal challenge to his firing. A year after his termination, he told the BBC he has struggled to secure full-time work as a journalist. Even though his new home state has a professional basketball team, he believes the viral controversy has made him unemployable in the tight-knit world of professional basketball journalism. He has launched his own independent podcast, but admits he doubts it will generate enough income to cover his family’s living expenses, and leaving the United States is now an option he is actively considering. “I have accepted that that life is over and that I need to start a new one,” he said.

    Despite the profound personal and professional costs they have endured, almost all of the workers who spoke to the BBC said they do not regret the comments that cost them their jobs. “I have a right to say what I want to say,” Brown said. “They are the ones who should have the regrets, not me.”

    Shirinian apologized for the tone of her comment shortly after her suspension, acknowledging it was an emotional outburst that was never intended to be widely public. But she stands by the core sentiment behind her words. “I don’t regret the sentiment, however,” she said. “the sentiment was that I am not sad. And I refuse to be made to feel like I have to be sad that someone who was so hateful was killed.” She took the settlement rather than waiting for a full trial to move forward with her life, saying “I took a settlement because this allows me to move on with my life. The one small regret that I have is that I will not see my day in court and justice will not be served in that way. But I think that the number of the settlement actually speaks to that anyway.”

    Bourguet similarly stands by his comments, even as he grieves the impact the controversy has had on his family. “I don’t regret that line of thinking because I think it’s important to push back on things that are steeped in hatred,” he said. “I don’t regret what I said. I don’t regret the way that I said it. I do regret the ripple effects that came from it and the way that they impacted me, my career, my family, and my son.” At 35, he says, he is forced to start over: “My life will never be the same after this… I wouldn’t wish this on my worst enemy.”

  • Russians seek answers over hundreds missing after Ukraine’s 2024 incursion

    Russians seek answers over hundreds missing after Ukraine’s 2024 incursion

    More than two years after Ukrainian forces pushed across the border into Russia’s Kursk region, dozens of local families are still grappling with unanswered questions, overwhelming grief, and growing resentment toward the Russian government over its failure to support efforts to locate their missing loved ones.

    The 2024 incursion, which saw Ukrainian troops seize over 777 square kilometers of Russian territory over six days, was launched as a strategic maneuver to divert Russian military resources away from Kyiv’s frontline offensive operations. Within days, Ukrainian forces captured two key border checkpoints, took roughly 40 Russian prisoners, and struck a military convoy, holding control of the Sudzha district and surrounding areas for eight months. During that period, most mobile and internet connectivity across the occupied zone was completely cut off, leaving family members who had fled the fighting with no way to contact relatives who chose to stay behind.

    For many residents who remained in the captured settlements, the choice to stay came after years of heavy messaging from Russian state media. Lyubov, a local woman whose 75-year-old mother stayed in the village of Darino, says she repeatedly begged her mother to evacuate, but state television propaganda convinced her the incursion would be over in days and everything would quickly return to normal. “State channels kept telling viewers everything was under control, that it would all be sorted out in two or three days,” Lyubov recalled. “My mother believed them, and she refused to leave.” Russian officials estimate around 2,000 civilians stayed in the settlements that fell under Ukrainian control.

    As fighting dragged on and Russian forces launched counteroffensives to retake the territory by late autumn 2024, desperate family members stepped in to do what government agencies had not. A group of more than 100 relatives penned a joint letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and the United Nations requesting a dedicated humanitarian corridor to evacuate trapped civilians, but no such corridor was ever established. Left with no official support, the families formed independent search groups, compiling their own lists of missing residents, cross-referencing names with footage published by Ukrainian media and the military, and documenting reported deaths and burial locations. By the time the collective list grew to nearly 1,000 names, it remained a purely volunteer effort.

    Multiple requests for official help went unanswered. Lyubov says she reached out to both the International Committee of the Red Cross and the Kursk regional interior ministry with appeals for information about her mother, but never received a single response. In early 2025, Russia’s federal human rights commissioner released an official list of 517 reported missing Kursk residents, but the document was so riddled with errors that it mixed the names of missing people with the names of the relatives searching for them. Outraged families called the botched list a slap in the face to grieving loved ones, with one young woman who lost both parents posting online that the publication represented “the height of incompetence and a total lack of basic respect” for affected families.

    After Russian forces retook Darino village in late 2024 – where officials confirm 90 percent of structures were destroyed in heavy fighting – they began evacuating surviving civilians and recovering the bodies of those who did not make it. An evacuee from Darino eventually reached out to Lyubov with devastating news: her mother had died several weeks earlier from an untreated head injury, one of multiple elderly residents who perished after being trapped in harsh wartime conditions. But for months, Lyubov still had no way to locate her mother’s remains, as officials repeatedly told her the area remained too dangerous to search for missing bodies.

    Even volunteer recovery efforts have been left to self-fund. Yuri Tkachev, a local village council head who joined volunteer body recovery missions, says volunteers and private donations cover all costs for body bags, fuel, and transportation – authorities have provided no financial or logistical support. While regional officials held multiple meetings with the search group in the second half of 2025, relatives say the talks yielded no tangible change or support.

    It was not until last October that Lyubov finally got an answer, during a trip to the regional capital Kursk. When she asked about unidentified bodies matching her mother’s description, a mortuary official pulled up a photo from April 2025. Lyubov immediately recognized her mother’s face and the old wool jumper she wore for gardening. Lyubov had submitted a DNA sample to authorities back in January to help identify remains, but officials told her the sample had been lost – meaning her mother’s body had gone unidentified in the mortuary for six months. Unable to bury her mother in the destroyed village of Darino, Lyubov had her cremated, and her ashes now sit on a shelf in Lyubov’s apartment in Belgorod, roughly 100 miles from her mother’s former home.

    The BBC reached out to the Kursk regional governor’s office, Russia’s human rights commissioner, and the Russian Red Cross for comment on the families’ allegations, but none responded to requests. Ukrainian officials, including the command of Ukraine’s Territorial Defense Forces and Ukraine’s human rights commissioner, say all civilians evacuated from Kursk by Ukrainian forces have already been transferred back to Russian authorities.

    For Lyubov, the loss of her mother has transformed her long-held faith in the Russian state into open resentment, a rare stance in a country where public criticism of the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine is heavily suppressed. She still remembers a time when border life was peaceful: she would regularly cycle across the border into Ukraine to buy groceries, yarn, and ice cream, visiting with neighbors on both sides. “We went to see them, they came to see us,” she said. “And now not one of those villages exists any more.”

    Local officials have publicly stated that more than 300 people remain unaccounted for in Kursk, but independent search organizers say the true number of missing civilians is almost certainly higher, with no centralized, accurate official database to confirm the full scale of the crisis.