作者: admin

  • Full text of Iran’s National Security Council statement on ceasefire

    Full text of Iran’s National Security Council statement on ceasefire

    After 40 days of open conflict that ignited when US and Israeli forces launched strikes on Iranian targets, triggering cross-regional retaliatory missile and drone attacks that pushed the Middle East to the brink of full-scale war, a two-week ceasefire has entered into force, opening a fragile diplomatic window to de-escalate tensions. The outbreak of fighting severely disrupted commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most critical chokepoint for global energy supplies, stoking widespread international alarm over the risk of a broader regional conflict that could send shockwaves through the global economy.

    The ceasefire agreement, announced by former US President Donald Trump, was brokered through extensive mediation led by the government of Pakistan, and it is conditional on the full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to commercial traffic, with formal negotiations set to kick off in Islamabad in the coming days. Both Washington and Tehran have claimed victory from the period of open conflict: US officials assert that American forces achieved all core military objectives set out at the start of hostilities, while Iranian authorities frame the ceasefire as a triumph that forced the United States to agree to negotiate based on Tehran’s pre-set 10-point framework of demands.

    Key agenda items for the upcoming talks include rules governing maritime transit through the Strait of Hormuz, full relief for Iran from international and US sanctions, and a negotiated settlement over the future presence of US combat forces across the Middle East. Iranian officials have stressed that the opening of negotiations does not mark a permanent end to hostilities, while their US counterparts have described the diplomatic process as a rare opportunity to forge a broader, long-term stability agreement. Most independent observers characterize the ceasefire as a temporary pause to de-escalate, rather than a durable resolution, with the final outcome of talks remaining deeply uncertain.

    In a full official statement released by Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Tehran framed the ceasefire as an undeniable, historic defeat for US and Israeli aggression. The statement credits what it calls the strategic prudence of Iran’s supreme leadership, the bravery of Iranian and Axis of Resistance fighters across the region, and the unified mass support of the Iranian people for forcing the US to accept Tehran’s 10-point terms as a basis for negotiations. The core demands laid out in the Iranian framework include a binding US commitment to refrain from future aggression against Iran, permanent recognition of Iran’s full sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, international recognition of Iran’s right to nuclear enrichment, full lifting of all primary and secondary sanctions on Iran, termination of all hostile UN Security Council and International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors resolutions against the country, full compensation for damages Iran has sustained from decades of US hostilities, complete withdrawal of all US combat forces from the Middle East region, and an end to all US support for military campaigns against the Axis of Resistance, including Hezbollah in Lebanon.

    The statement notes that from the opening hours of the conflict, US and Israeli leadership held wildly optimistic assumptions that a rapid military campaign would force Iran into full surrender, partition the country, and seize its natural energy resources. These plans failed entirely, the statement argues, due to coordinated defensive and offensive operations by Iran and its resistance allies that inflicted irreversible damage to US military infrastructure across the region, weakened the Israeli military’s position in occupied territories, and exposed the inability of the US-led coalition to achieve core war aims within the first 10 days of fighting.

    According to the Iranian official statement, the United States began reaching out through quiet diplomatic channels to request a ceasefire shortly after that, but Tehran rejected all initial appeals until all of its core preconditions were formally accepted. Tehran also notes that it has repeatedly rejected arbitrary deadlines set by the US, emphasizing that it places no value on timelines imposed by hostile powers. The ceasefire and negotiation process were approved by Iran’s Supreme National Security Council and supreme leadership after the US formally accepted all 10 of Iran’s core principles via Pakistani mediation, with talks set to open in Islamabad on April 10 and allocated a two-week window that can be extended by mutual consent.

    The statement stresses that the opening of negotiations does not mean an end to the conflict, and that hostilities will resume if the US fails to follow through on its commitments to finalize the agreement in line with Iran’s 10-point framework. It calls for full national unity across all Iranian political groups and civil society during the negotiation period, noting that the process is an extension of the battlefield fought under the supervision of Iran’s highest leadership. The statement concludes by warning that Iran remains fully militarily prepared to resume hostilities immediately if the US makes any concession or violates the agreed terms, while celebrating what it calls a historic turning point that has established Iranian regional dominance as the basis for any future security order in the Middle East.

  • The gift card Israel uses to buy US weapons

    The gift card Israel uses to buy US weapons

    For decades, the framing of U.S. military transfers to Israel as “arms sales” has obscured a critical, underreported reality: the vast majority of these transactions are not paid for by the Israeli government, but by American taxpayers. This hidden subsidy is now at the center of a growing congressional pushback, led by progressive lawmakers who are demanding an end to U.S. public funding for what they describe as destructive Israeli military operations.

    Earlier this year, four U.S. senators — Independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Democrats Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, Jeff Merkley of Oregon, and Peter Welch of Vermont — introduced joint resolutions of disapproval to block a $659 million shipment of 22,000 bombs to Israel, a transfer originally approved by the Trump administration. What makes this deal particularly contentious, the lawmakers argue, is that many of the weapons are being drawn directly from active U.S. military stockpiles, and the entire cost will be covered by U.S. taxpayers.

    In a public statement announcing the resolutions, Sanders emphasized that in the wake of widespread destruction caused by Israel’s far-right government under Benjamin Netanyahu across Gaza, Lebanon, and regional flashpoints like Iran, providing tens of thousands of new munitions is the last priority American taxpayers should be forced to fund. Van Hollen echoed this position, noting that Congress must use every legislative tool at its disposal to halt what the caucus frames as Trump’s escalation of regional conflict, starting with cutting off taxpayer-funded weapons transfers to the Netanyahu administration.

    Policy analyst Stephen Semler, a non-resident senior fellow at the Center for International Policy, recently published an in-depth data investigation that confirms the broad scope of taxpayer funding for U.S. arms transfers to Israel. As Semler explains, the label of “arms sale” is misleading by design. While Israel is officially listed as the purchaser in formal government notifications, the funding source is almost exclusively the U.S. Foreign Military Financing (FMF) program — an annual U.S. military aid package that provides Israel with at least $3.3 billion in public U.S. funds each year, which functions essentially as a taxpayer-funded “gift card” for Israeli weapons purchases.

    Semler illustrated this dynamic by examining the four most recent publicly notified arms sales to Israel, published in the Federal Register: a $740 million deal for armored personnel carriers, a $1.98 billion contract for tactical vehicles and accessories, a $3.8 billion transfer for attack helicopters and related weaponry, and a $150 million deal for utility helicopters and replacement parts. In every single listing, the “funding source” field is marked as Foreign Military Financing, meaning U.S. taxpayer money covers the cost. Only one deal included a minor contribution from Israeli national funds, making the overwhelming majority of the $6.7 billion in tested transactions fully U.S.-funded. The 22,000-bomb shipment targeted by the Senate resolutions? Both components of that deal are 100% FMF-funded.

    Expanding this analysis to cover the full four-year term of the Biden administration from 2021 to 2024, Semler compiled and cross-checked data from two official U.S. defense sources: the Defense Security Cooperation Agency’s (DSCA) Historical Sales Books for government-brokered Foreign Military Sales, and the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls’ (DDTC) Section 655 Reports for private commercial Direct Commercial Sales. The findings are stark: the Biden administration authorized a total of $22 billion in arms sales to Israel over that period, split between more than $13.2 billion in government-brokered deals and over $8.7 billion in commercial transactions.

    DSCA data shows 90% of government-brokered sales are covered by U.S. military aid, and while DDTC does not publicly disclose funding sources for commercial sales, Semler’s estimate based on Israel’s historic average of FMF spending on commercial arms puts that share at 68%. All combined, Semler calculates that U.S. taxpayers covered $17.8 billion of the $22 billion in total Biden-era arms sales to Israel — 81% of the total value, or nearly $18 billion in taxpayer subsidies that have been misrepresented as commercial sales.

    This reality undermines the most common policy justifications for continuing large-scale arms transfers to Israel. Proponents of the deals often argue they boost U.S. economic activity and create domestic jobs, but the fact that American taxpayers foot the bill eliminates any claim that the transfers bring meaningful foreign investment into the U.S. economy. Even the job creation argument falls apart under scrutiny: military spending is widely recognized as one of the least efficient ways for the U.S. government to generate new employment.

    Historical data backs this up: in 1985, the U.S. military budget stood at $295 billion, equal to $746 billion in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars, and the U.S. arms industry employed 3 million American workers. By 2021, the inflation-adjusted military budget had grown by $132 billion to $879 billion — an 18% real increase — but arms industry employment plummeted to just 1.1 million workers, a 63% drop in jobs despite massively increased public spending. The reliance on a job creation argument also tacitly reveals the weakness of national security justifications, Semmer argues: a policy that truly served core U.S. national security interests would not need to be defended on the grounds of job growth alone.

    As the Senate prepares to consider the resolutions to block the Trump-approved bomb shipment, the analysis makes clear that the debate is not just about Israel’s military actions in the Middle East — it is about the growing burden of U.S. taxpayer funding for foreign military operations. Semler concludes that American taxpayers are owed a refund for decades of hidden subsidies, rather than being asked to cover billions more in weapons costs under new and existing administrations.

  • Brit says he is not elusive Bitcoin creator named by New York Times

    Brit says he is not elusive Bitcoin creator named by New York Times

    One of the crypto world’s most enduring unsolved mysteries has reignited after a high-profile New York Times investigation recently named British Bitcoin entrepreneur and developer Adam Back as the anonymous inventor of Bitcoin, known only by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Back has publicly and firmly rejected the claim, dismissing the publication’s findings as a classic case of confirmation bias.

    In a post shared on X with the BBC, Back clarified his position in the Bitcoin ecosystem: “I’m not satoshi, but I was early in laser focus on the positive societal implications of cryptography, online privacy and electronic cash.”

    The 11,000-word feature from reporter John Carreyrou laid out several pieces of circumstantial evidence linking Back to Satoshi Nakamoto, including linguistic similarities between Back’s old emails and online posts and the writing style of the person behind the Satoshi pseudonym. The article also noted a correlation between Back’s online activity gaps and the timeline of Satoshi’s sudden disappearance from public crypto forums shortly after Bitcoin’s foundational white paper was published in 2008. The report claimed Back was absent from Bitcoin discussion boards during Satoshi’s most active period, only to reemerge after Satoshi vanished.

    Back pushed back against each of these claims directly. He countered that he was an active contributor to early Bitcoin forums, saying he actually “did a lot of yakking” on the platforms during the period in question. The remaining evidence cited by the New York Times, he argued, is nothing more than “a combination of coincidence and similar phrases from people with similar experience and interests.” Back also joked about his own relatively small Bitcoin holdings, writing online: “Kicking myself for not mining in anger in 2009.”

    The global fascination with Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity stems not just from the mystery itself, but from the enormous fortune the inventor is believed to hold. Satoshi mined more than 1 million Bitcoins in the early days of the cryptocurrency, when mining was far less competitive. That holding accounts for roughly 5% of the total 21 million Bitcoins that will ever exist, and at current market prices, the stash is valued at approximately $70 billion — enough to place Satoshi among the 20 wealthiest people on the planet.

    This recent accusation against Back is far from the first time someone has been publicly “unmasked” as Satoshi Nakamoto, and nearly all prior claims have been denied or disproven. In 2014, Newsweek magazine identified Japanese-American engineer Dorian Nakamoto as Bitcoin’s creator, a claim he immediately denied that has since been fully debunked. In 2015, two tech outlets Wired and Gizmodo pointed to Australian computer scientist Craig Wright, who later went so far as to claim publicly that he was Satoshi. After years of legal wrangling and unsubstantiated assertions, a UK High Court judge ruled Wright was not Satoshi Nakamoto — and Back himself testified as a witness against Wright’s claims during the proceedings.

    More recent attempts to name Satoshi have also fallen flat. In 2024, an HBO documentary named Canadian crypto expert Peter Todd as the inventor, a claim Todd called “ludicrous” and backed up with evidence discrediting the accusation. Just months later, a British man named Stephen Mollah held a London press conference to claim he was Satoshi, but his assertion was widely dismissed by the crypto community.

    For many core members of the Bitcoin community, the anonymity of Satoshi Nakamoto is not just a random curiosity — it is a core part of Bitcoin’s ideological identity as a decentralized, leaderless digital currency unconnected to any single person or institution. Back echoed this widely held view in his recent comments, writing that he does not know who Satoshi Nakamoto is, and “I think it is good for bitcoin.”

  • Beijing hires riders as food safety sentinels

    Beijing hires riders as food safety sentinels

    Amid growing public concern over the safety of China’s booming online takeout industry, Beijing’s municipal market regulatory authority has launched a new initiative that enlists thousands of food delivery riders as frontline food safety sentinels, expanding a co-governance model that has already been tested across multiple Chinese regions.

    Under the newly announced program, delivery riders are encouraged to document and report food safety violations they encounter during restaurant pickups, such as unlicensed business operations, unsanitary kitchen environments, and non-compliant food handling practices. A specialized in-app “snap and report” tool is provided to streamline the submission process. Reports are first screened by delivery platforms, with verified tips passed along to official regulatory teams for investigation. Riders earn cash or other rewards for confirmed violations, creating a closed-loop system that delivers public transparency and outcome feedback to contributors.

    The initiative marks a key expansion of China’s national push toward multi-stakeholder food safety co-governance, which combines formal government regulatory oversight, corporate platform responsibility, and grassroots public participation. Beyond individual case investigations, Beijing regulators plan to aggregate and analyze reporting data to map recurring risk patterns, enabling targeted regulatory inspections and industry-wide food safety training for food service operators.

    Several Beijing districts have already completed pilot testing of the model. Haidian District, home to the city’s major university zone and a dense cluster of restaurants, has appointed more than 1,000 participating riders as official food safety sentinels, while Tongzhou District has launched a dedicated mini-program to simplify and speed up the reporting workflow.

    Similar programs have already been rolled out across the country, from the coastal commercial hub of Shanghai to eastern Zhejiang Province, and southwestern Guizhou Province to the remote northwestern Qinghai Province and central Hubei Province. Local authorities in these regions have partnered with major delivery platforms to mobilize the country’s millions of delivery riders, who have unmatched daily access to back-of-house restaurant conditions, to supplement formal regulatory resources.

    Many localities have already recorded tangible early results from the model. In Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Guizhou, more than 400 riders have joined the program as voluntary sentinels. Since launching at the start of 2026, riders have submitted 42 credible violation reports, all of which were confirmed by regulators, leading to six formal enforcement investigations, according to local state-run outlet Guizhou Daily.

    One participating rider in Qiandongnan, surnamed Wang, shared his experience reporting a local restaurant where staff handled ready-to-eat food without face masks and no employees held valid required health certificates. “I took photos of the violations and uploaded them through the official reporting channel,” he explained. “Within just two days, regulators had confirmed the violations and ordered the restaurant to correct the issues immediately.” Wang received a reward for his verified report, and added that the extra role has made his daily delivery work feel more meaningful.

    Back in Beijing, the new initiative has drawn mixed reactions from the city’s delivery workforce and consumers, highlighting both its potential benefits and remaining challenges. Many riders and consumers have voiced strong support for the program. He Chengyu, a Beijing-based delivery rider with three years of on-the-job experience, noted that the policy creates a clear channel to improve overall industry hygiene standards. “We see the actual conditions in restaurant kitchens every single day that we work,” he said. “With clear rules and fair incentives, food safety for consumers should get a lot better.”

    Consumers have also echoed that support. Wang Haoqing, a finance professional who regularly orders takeout for work, said the new system adds an extra layer of reassurance for online food orders. Zhou Yan, a 32-year-old technology industry employee, agreed, pointing out that riders hold unique insight into actual restaurant hygiene that most consumers never see. “If you want to know which restaurants are actually clean, just ask the delivery riders — they know the situation better than anyone else,” she said, describing the policy as a very smart, practical solution to online food safety gaps.

    However, some riders have expressed caution about taking on the new responsibility, pointing to the already intense time pressure and algorithm-managed workloads that define the delivery industry. “We are already racing against the clock to hit on-time delivery targets,” one anonymous rider said. “Adding extra reporting responsibilities could hurt our delivery efficiency and ultimately cut into our monthly income.”

    In response to these concerns, Beijing regulatory officials have noted that targeted adjustments, including meaningful incentives for participation, pre-program training for riders, and streamlined, low-time-reporting tools, are core parts of the program design. These features are intended to balance the goal of improving food safety with protection for riders’ existing workloads and incomes.

  • AI weather model to aid BRI nations

    AI weather model to aid BRI nations

    Against a backdrop of globally rising extreme weather frequency and intensity, nations across the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) have voiced strong enthusiasm for a new China-initiated meteorological project that leverages artificial intelligence to upgrade weather forecasting capabilities and boost disaster preparedness. The initiative, officially launched in March 2026, is funded by China’s Ministry of Science and Technology and headed by the Center for Earth System Modeling and Prediction under the China Meteorological Administration (CMA).

    The project builds on the foundation of MAZU, China’s existing open-source early warning meteorological platform that has already been rolled out in BRI partner states including Pakistan and Ethiopia, where it currently supports real-time atmospheric monitoring and rapid disaster alert dissemination. For participating nations, the initiative addresses long-standing gaps in climate resilience that have held back sustainable development.

    Kouam Magloire, head of data processing at Cameroon’s national meteorological services, noted that the collaboration represents a transformative opportunity for his country to reinforce early warning infrastructure and improve response outcomes when extreme weather strikes. Mongolia, which regularly faces severe droughts, winter blizzards and other extreme events, also highlighted the urgent need for AI-powered nowcasting — short-term forecasts ranging from minutes to hours ahead that rely on high-resolution satellite and radar data. “Through this partnership, we aim to build a far more advanced long-term forecasting system that can better protect our communities,” said Altansuvd Bold, an engineer with Mongolia’s National Agency for Meteorology and Environmental Monitoring.

    Ethiopia, another BRI partner already hosting the MAZU platform, emphasized China’s leading position in both meteorological innovation and artificial intelligence development. “Ethiopia looks forward to accessing cutting-edge technology through this project, training local technical experts, and closing critical gaps in our national nowcasting and early warning services,” explained Leta Bekele Gudina, a senior expert at the Ethiopian Meteorological Institute.

    Data from the CMA underscores the urgent need for this intervention: between 1980 and 2022, BRI participating nations suffered an average of $214.7 billion in direct annual economic losses from meteorological disasters, accounting for 28.4% of total global losses from such events. Most of these countries face systemic constraints including sparse weather observation networks, limited computing infrastructure, and outdated forecasting technology, all of which hinder effective disaster preparedness and long-term sustainable growth.

    To tackle these overlapping challenges, the project’s core goal is to develop a fully integrated AI-powered forecasting system that delivers accurate predictions across all time scales, from immediate nowcasting out to sub-seasonal outlooks. The new framework combines traditional physical atmospheric models with cutting-edge machine learning approaches, and will be customized to fit the unique geographic and climatic conditions of each partner nation. A flexible, modular intelligent forecasting device will also be designed to adapt to nations with varying levels of existing technical infrastructure, removing barriers to deployment.

    Project leader Han Wei outlined the initiative’s implementation timeline: the platform will operate for a minimum of six months across more than six BRI partner nations, with early warning services expected to reach approximately 10 million vulnerable people once fully deployed. All AI forecasting models developed through the project will eventually be integrated into the existing MAZU platform to create a sustained, stable technological foundation for long-term international meteorological cooperation.

    Leading Chinese climate scientists have praised the initiative for aligning cutting-edge technology with pressing global development needs. Chen Deliang, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, noted that the project directly answers unmet urgent demands from BRI nations while advancing the practical application of artificial intelligence in the atmospheric sciences. Zhang Xiaoye, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, added that future work should focus on strengthening regional downscaling techniques to better tailor forecasting outputs to the specific needs of individual partner countries.

  • Pakistani PM says US-Iran ceasefire covers ‘everywhere’ including Lebanon

    Pakistani PM says US-Iran ceasefire covers ‘everywhere’ including Lebanon

    ISLAMABAD – In a surprise diplomatic announcement made Wednesday, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has confirmed that Iran, the United States and their respective allied factions have reached a deal for an immediate ceasefire that will be enforced across all affected regions, including Lebanon.

    Sharif shared the details of the breakthrough agreement in an official statement posted to the social media platform X, noting that the truce entered into force the moment the announcement was made.

    “I warmly welcome the sagacious gesture and extend deepest gratitude to the leadership of both the countries,” Sharif said in his statement. The prime minister extended a formal invitation to delegations from both nations to attend talks in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad this Friday, April 10, 2026. The upcoming negotiations are aimed at advancing toward a final, binding agreement that can resolve all outstanding disputes between the two long-adversarial states.

    Sharif praised both Tehran and Washington for demonstrating “remarkable wisdom and understanding” throughout the diplomatic process that led to the ceasefire deal. He added that he holds strong optimism that the newly scheduled “Islamabad Talks” will pave the way for long-term, durable peace in the region after years of escalating tensions.

  • Yangtze River underwater rail project goes full speed ahead

    Yangtze River underwater rail project goes full speed ahead

    A major milestone in China’s expanding high-speed rail network has captured public attention across Chinese social media, as the landmark Shanghai-Chongqing-Chengdu high-speed railway’s Yangtze River underwater tunnel hits a critical construction benchmark.

    Over the weekend following the late-March breakthrough, discussions of the cross-river tunnel project dominated national social platforms, with the topic “China to launch high-speed railway under the Yangtze River” trending on China’s leading microblogging platform Weibo at the end of March. As a core national infrastructure project listed in China’s 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030) outline, the full 2,000-kilometer high-speed rail corridor carries a total investment of 500 billion yuan, equal to approximately $72.8 billion.

    On March 29, after 23 consecutive months of safe, steady excavation, the domestically built “Linghang” shield tunneling machine completed a record 11.18-kilometer underwater digging run, successfully passing beneath the Yangtze River’s southern embankment. The tunnel in question, stretching between Chongming district in Shanghai and Taicang city in Jiangsu province, is the longest and largest high-speed rail cross-river tunnel ever built in China, with a total planned length of 14.25 kilometers. It is a central segment of the Shanghai-Chongqing-Chengdu high-speed railway, a key backbone route in China’s national “eight vertical and eight horizontal” high-speed rail network. Project estimates cited by China Central Television suggest the full corridor will generate up to 1.5 trillion yuan in added value across its entire industrial chain, delivering tangible economic benefits to more than 20 small and medium-sized cities along the route.

    The Linghang machine’s single-drive excavation run marks a new global engineering achievement. The project requires a 11.325-kilometer uninterrupted single-drive digging distance, with the machine’s cutter head measuring 15.4 meters in diameter and the tunnel reaching a maximum depth of 89 meters below the riverbed. Designed to accommodate high-speed trains operating at speeds up to 350 kilometers per hour, the tunnel will allow trains to cross the Yangtze River without reducing speed, a feat that demands extraordinary engineering precision.

    “At a speed of 350 km/h, the required construction precision falls within the millimeter range,” explained Wang Yi, deputy equipment manager for the project, in an interview with ThePaper.cn. Wang noted that underwater tunnel construction faces unique challenges from variable river water pressure, natural geological settlement, and other environmental factors. Even a minor alignment deviation can compromise operational safety and passenger comfort, placing extremely strict requirements on structural precision, track smoothness, and resistance to external interference.

    This milestone is far more than a technical breakthrough, Wang emphasized. It cements China’s global leading position in high-speed rail underwater tunnel construction and proves the country has fully mastered core technologies for ultra-high-speed underwater tunnel projects, creating replicable, scalable expertise that can be applied to similar infrastructure projects worldwide in the future.

    Shield tunneling machines, which require highly complex integrated systems and extreme manufacturing precision, are widely recognized as a key benchmark of a country’s advanced manufacturing capacity. A single Linghang-class machine is made up of more than 20,000 individual components, and its development tells a broader story of China’s decades-long progress in heavy manufacturing: from relying entirely on imported machinery 30 years ago to becoming a global industry leader.

    China’s journey to domestic shield machine development began in 2002, when research and development of the technology was added to a national key scientific research program, launching the country’s localization push. Just two years later, in 2004, China’s first domestically built metro shield machine was unveiled in Shanghai and deployed successfully for soft soil excavation. Over the subsequent two decades, Chinese-developed shield tunneling machines have achieved continuous technological breakthroughs, with rising levels of independent innovation and intelligent integration. Today, Chinese-made shield machines are exported to more than 40 countries and regions around the world, holding roughly 70 percent of the global market share.

    Once the full Shanghai-Chongqing-Chengdu high-speed railway is completed, it will drastically cut travel times between the Yangtze River Delta region in eastern China and the Chengdu-Chongqing economic hub in southwestern China, strengthening economic connectivity, facilitating regional integration, and driving balanced growth across the entire Yangtze River Economic Belt.

  • An officer and a hero, both in life and death

    An officer and a hero, both in life and death

    On the evening of October 31, 2025, a routine on-call shift at Yuwang Police Station in Ningxia’s Tongxin County turned into a fatal test of courage for 34-year-old duty officer Yang Guolin. The emergency call that came in that night carried an urgent plea: a tanker driver had collapsed inside the vehicle’s tank while cleaning it, lying unconscious at the bottom with no sign of movement. With the nearest professional rescue team more than 70 kilometers away — a 90-minute drive that the victim could not wait out — Yang and his colleague Ma Chao rushed to the scene immediately.

    When the two officers arrived, panic had already taken hold of the crowd gathered at the site. Climbing onto the top of the tank, Yang shone his flashlight through the narrow hatch, confirming the driver’s motionless form at the bottom. The air inside the sealed tank was thick with toxic fumes, and no professional breathing apparatus was available on site. Refusing to wait for backup, Yang grabbed the only protective gear that could be scavenged from bystanders: an N95 mask and a damp cloth, and lowered himself into the hazardous space.

    Inside the tank, suffocating fumes quickly overwhelmed Yang. After failing to rouse the unconscious driver, he pulled himself back to the hatch to catch his breath and call for a rope. When Ma Chao saw Yang’s lips turning purple — a clear warning sign of toxic poisoning — he begged Yang to pull himself out immediately. Yang’s response was short and unshakable: “If I come up, what happens to the driver?” He turned back into the tank to finish the rescue.

    What would have been a straightforward operation with proper equipment became a brutal battle against Yang’s own failing body. His fingers stiffened from toxic exposure, every movement drained the last of his strength, but he still managed to secure the rope around the driver’s torso and push the man up toward the hatch. When the driver began to slip back, Yang made one final, desperate lift to push him to safety.

    The driver survived. Yang collapsed inside the tank, less than two meters from the hatch he never reached. Though rescuers pulled both men out and rushed them to the hospital, Yang was pronounced dead shortly after arrival.

    Yang’s life was defined by quiet commitment to serving his community long before that fateful night. Born in 1991 to a rural family in Tongxin, Yang became the first university graduate in his family, graduating from Beijing City University in 2016. At a time when most young graduates from small towns chased opportunities in wealthy metropolises, Yang made the deliberate choice to return to his hometown. “We’re from Tongxin,” he often said. “We ought to do something for our hometown.”

    In 2018, he deepened that commitment by volunteering for a teaching post in Artux, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Taking over a fifth-grade Chinese class that ranked dead last in its year, he promised to lift their scores within a single semester. He spent long days and late nights preparing targeted lessons and tutoring struggling students, and by the end of the term, the class had climbed from last place to first. The experience reinforced his core belief: with full commitment, no task was impossible.

    Becoming a police officer had been Yang’s lifelong dream, and he pursued it with unwavering persistence for six years. Year after year, he took the national police entrance exam, even when his wife Li Ling gently urged him to give up his stubborn quest. “This is my life’s dream,” he would tell her. “No matter how hard it is, I want to keep trying.” In the summer of 2022, his persistence paid off: he finally put on the uniform he had chased for half a decade, and volunteered for the Yuwang Police Station posting — a remote station 78 kilometers from the county seat, widely known as one of the toughest assignments in the region.

    Starting out handling office paperwork, Yang quickly organized years of disorganized files and brought order to chaotic record-keeping. Unsatisfied with desk work, he requested a transfer to the case handling team, promising to master all core procedures within a month. From then on, he worked shifts in the field by day and studied legal texts and policing protocols line by line at night. It did not take long for him to earn a spot on the team.

    What made Yang beloved by local residents was his refusal to dismiss any problem as “too small” to matter. On a stormy autumn night, when a group of local villagers were owed more than 340,000 yuan in plowing wages and the muddy roads had become impassable to vehicles, Yang trekked more than one kilometer through rain and sludge to reach the site. Soaked to the bone, he mediated the dispute immediately, and did not leave until the employer paid the full owed amount on the spot.

    On another occasion, an elderly shopkeeper was left distraught after a customer underpaid him by 100 yuan — money the elderly man relied on for his livelihood. Yang reviewed the shop’s surveillance footage, tracked down the customer, and drove 40 kilometers that same night to recover the full amount. When the old man later brought homegrown vegetables to thank him, Yang refused the gift, saying the 100 yuan was the old man’s hard-earned money and he was only glad to return what was owed.

    In the summer of 2024, a string of shop burglaries left local merchants on edge. Yang spent days working the case, connecting incident patterns, analyzing clues, and eventually identified and arrested the culprit. After that, local shopkeepers often said: with Officer Yang around, we feel safe.

    Yang drew inspiration from the station’s long tradition of heroic service. Early in his career, after learning the story of Hai Xiaoping, a young officer who died of overwork and was named a second-class national hero model, Yang wrote in his notebook that he hoped to emulate Hai’s courage in the face of hardship and danger. That promise was fulfilled in his final act.

    After Yang collapsed, his colleague Ma Chao jumped into the tank to hold him, continuing to shout for help even after he was pulled out, exhausted and half-conscious, calling Yang’s name until he lost consciousness.

    Yang leaves behind his wife and an infant son. His last text exchange with his wife ended just 30 minutes before the emergency rescue call came. When he was laid to rest, dozens of villagers came spontaneously to pay their respects, including an elderly local man whom Yang had supported quietly for years, listing himself as the man’s emergency contact and visiting regularly with daily supplies. The old man had repeatedly invited Yang to stay for a meal, and Yang always said he was too busy, that he would come next time. There would be no next time.

    Yang served as a full-fledged police officer for just three years. In that short time, he handled more than 100 cases, earned the unwavering trust of both villagers and colleagues, and gave his last breath to save a stranger’s life. While many careers are measured by rank or length of service, Yang Guolin’s legacy will be forever tied to a damp cloth, a rope held by stiffening fingers, and a final choice to never leave someone behind.

  • Matthew Perry’s stepmother says ‘Ketamine Queen’ should get maximum sentence

    Matthew Perry’s stepmother says ‘Ketamine Queen’ should get maximum sentence

    Almost two years after the sudden accidental death of beloved *Friends* star Matthew Perry, the case surrounding his passing is approaching a key milestone, with one of his family members making an impassioned plea for harsh justice against the woman at the center of the drug distribution ring linked to his death.

    Perry, who earned global fame for his decades-long portrayal of quick-witted Chandler Bing on the iconic 1990s sitcom, was found unresponsive in the hot tub of his Los Angeles residence in October 2023. A Los Angeles medical examiner later officially ruled his death an accident triggered by the acute toxic effects of ketamine. The actor had openly discussed his decades-long battle with substance addiction, and was using ketamine as part of a clinically supervised treatment program for depression at the time of his death.

    Jasveen Sangha, a defendant dubbed the “Ketamine Queen” and a dual US-UK citizen who has been held in federal custody since 2024, is scheduled to be sentenced on Wednesday. She previously pleaded guilty to five federal charges, including one count of distributing ketamine that resulted in death or serious bodily injury. If the judge hands down the full penalty supported by prosecutors, she could spend more than 60 years behind bars.

    In a formal victim impact statement submitted to a California federal court on Tuesday, Perry’s stepmother Debbie Perry called for the harshest possible sentence, arguing Sangha’s illegal actions caused irreversible harm that stretches far beyond Perry’s death. “The pain you’ve caused to hundreds maybe thousands is irreversible,” she wrote. “There is no joy… No light in the window. They won’t be back.” She went on to criticize Sangha for leveraging her business acumen to profit from harming vulnerable people instead of building a legitimate career: “You caused this… You who has talent for business enough to make money chose the one way that hurts people.” Closing her statement, she urged the court to impose the maximum penalty to prevent Sangha from destroying more families: “Please give this heartless woman the maximum prison sentence so she won’t be able to hurt other families like ours.”

    Sangha has publicly expressed remorse for her role in Perry’s death. In an interview with *The Sun* conducted from her prison cell, she acknowledged full responsibility for her actions, saying: “There are no excuses for what I did. I am deeply sorry for the pain I caused, especially to Matthew’s family.”

    Sangha is one of five people convicted of felony charges connected to Perry’s death. The first two convictions came last year: Dr. Salvador Plasencia, who admitted to four counts of ketamine distribution in the weeks leading up to Perry’s death, received a 30-month prison sentence. Dr. Mark Chavez, another co-conspirator, was sentenced to eight months of home detention followed by three years of supervised release. Court documents reveal Chavez sold the ketamine to Plasencia, who then resold it to Perry at a markup of hundreds of percent, charging $2,000 per vial. In a text message uncovered by investigators, Plasencia laughed at Perry’s vulnerability, writing, “I wonder how much this moron will pay.”

    Court records outline Sangha’s role in the network: she worked through a middleman named Erik Fleming to supply 51 vials of ketamine to Kenneth Iwamasa, Perry’s personal assistant. On the day of Perry’s death, October 28 2023, Iwamasa administered at least three separate ketamine injections to the star, the combination of which led to his fatal overdose. After the transaction, Sangha instructed Fleming to erase all communication between them to cover up their activity. Iwamasa and Fleming are scheduled to be sentenced for their roles later this month.

  • Iran claims ‘historic victory,’ says US accepted terms ahead of talks

    Iran claims ‘historic victory,’ says US accepted terms ahead of talks

    Diplomatic efforts to de-escalate months of open conflict between the United States and Iran have moved forward this week, with formal negotiations scheduled to open Friday in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad, following a last-minute Pakistani-brokered agreement to pause military operations for two weeks. Both sides have framed the upcoming talks as rooted in a 10-point Iranian proposal, which Iran’s Supreme National Security Council calls a landmark victory that forced Washington to accept its core negotiating framework.

    In an official statement released Wednesday, Iran’s top security body outlined the key demands embedded in its 10-point plan, which include binding guarantees of no foreign aggression against Iran, permanent Iranian sovereignty and control over the Strait of Hormuz, full relief from crippling U.S. economic sanctions, a complete withdrawal of U.S. military forces from the broader Middle East region, and war reparations for damage inflicted during the conflict. The council emphasized that while upcoming talks will focus on ironing out final details of the framework, the preliminary agreement to negotiate does not mark a permanent end to hostilities. Iran will retain the right to resume full military operations if its full demands are not met, the statement added.

    The diplomatic breakthrough followed a flurry of activity on Tuesday, as Pakistani leaders issued a last-minute appeal to U.S. President Donald Trump to step back from a looming deadline that would have seen expanded U.S. attacks on Iran. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif publicly called on Trump to extend his 8 p.m. EST deadline for escalating attacks by two weeks, to give diplomacy space to resolve the conflict. Sharif also requested that Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil chokepoint that had been closed to traffic during the conflict, to all commercial shipping during the ceasefire period.

    Trump accepted the Pakistani proposal in a post on his Truth Social platform, announcing he would suspend all U.S. bombing and offensive attacks on Iran for 14 days. The U.S. president framed the pause as a bilateral ceasefire conditional on Iran fully reopening the Strait of Hormuz immediately, noting that Iran’s 10-point proposal provides a “workable basis” to move forward with formal talks. Trump added that the U.S. had already exceeded all of its initial military objectives in the conflict, and that negotiations were already advanced toward a long-term peace deal for the Middle East. He also confirmed that almost all core points of contention between the two countries have already been agreed to in preliminary talks.

    Iran’s Supreme National Security Council confirmed Wednesday that Tehran shared its full 10-point proposal with Washington via Pakistani intermediation, and that the U.S. has formally accepted the proposal’s core principles as the foundation for formal negotiations. The council added that talks are scheduled to run up to 15 days, with an option to extend the negotiating window if needed. Any final agreement reached in Islamabad will be formalized through international verification mechanisms, the statement noted.

    The Iranian statement also pushed back against external framing of the ceasefire, claiming that Iranian military forces and their regional allied groups had inflicted severe, widespread losses on adversary forces across the Middle East, forcing the U.S. and its partners to pursue a diplomatic end to the conflict. Iran’s core long-term objective, the council said, is to establish a new regional security architecture rooted in what it describes as Iran’s established military and political supremacy in the region, and Tehran will maintain pressure on adversaries until its negotiated gains are fully consolidated.

    In a call for domestic solidarity, the Iranian security council urged full national unity across the country during the sensitive negotiating period, and warned that any provocative misstep by U.S. or partner forces will be met with an immediate, forceful response. Iran will only agree to a formal, permanent end to the conflict once every term of its original 10-point proposal has been fully agreed and implemented, the council reaffirmed. Key topics on the negotiating table in Islamabad will include rules for maritime transit through the Strait of Hormuz, concrete plans for lifting U.S. sanctions, and the future of U.S. military deployments in the Middle East.