作者： admin

The ‘bird theory,’ a viral TikTok trend, has sparked widespread debate about its effectiveness as a litmus test for relationship health. The concept, rooted in the idea of ‘bids for connection,’ measures a partner’s responsiveness to seemingly trivial observations, such as pointing out a bird. Layne Berthoud, an occupational therapist from Los Angeles, inadvertently became a focal point of this trend when her TikTok video, featuring her husband Alexandre Berthoud, garnered nearly 5 million views in just five days. In the video, Layne mentions seeing a bird, and Alexandre’s curious response—’Oh yeah?’—unwittingly passed the test.

The ‘bird theory’ is based on the work of Dr. John Gottman, a renowned marriage researcher, who emphasizes the importance of couples acknowledging each other’s bids for connection. According to Gottman, couples who consistently respond to these bids are more likely to stay together. However, experts like Carrie Cole, director of research at the Gottman Institute, express reservations about using such tests to gauge relationship health. ‘What if your partner fails?’ Cole asks, highlighting the potential pitfalls of contrived scenarios.

The trend is part of a broader social media phenomenon, including the ‘orange peel theory’ and the ‘princess treatment’ debate, which reflect a collective desire to understand and validate intimate relationships. Alexandra Solomon, a clinical psychologist, notes that these tests echo the relationship quizzes found in women’s magazines, offering a sense of validation or camaraderie. However, she cautions against overinterpreting the results, emphasizing that a failed test should prompt deeper conversations rather than immediate conclusions.

Despite the popularity of these tests, experts agree that they often provide limited insight into the true dynamics of a relationship. Layne and Alexandre Berthoud, for instance, emphasize the importance of daily efforts to nurture their relationship, rather than relying on viral tests. ‘If I really had deep relationship questions, I probably wouldn’t record it,’ Layne said, ‘And I definitely wouldn’t post it.’

A high-profile scandal has erupted at the Sabarimala Temple in Kerala, India, following revelations that gold plating from several idols and temple structures has been stolen. The Kerala High Court has taken serious note of the matter, describing it as a ‘heist and plundering of gold.’ The court has established a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the disappearance of approximately 4.54 kg of gold since 2019. The investigation has led to the arrest of three individuals, including a former assistant temple priest, Unnikrishnan Potty, who is accused of orchestrating the theft. Temple records indicate that the gold was originally donated by disgraced billionaire Vijay Mallya in 1998-99 for the gold-cladding of idols and temple structures. The court has criticized the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB), which manages the temple, for allowing Potty to remove the idols for ‘repairs’ and for mislabeling gold-clad items as ‘copper plates.’ The scandal has sparked political unrest, with opposition parties demanding the resignation of Kerala’s Minister for Temple Affairs, VN Vasavan. The SIT has been given six weeks to complete its investigation, and the court has vowed to hold all culprits accountable, regardless of their status or influence.

Australia has broadened its pioneering social media ban for children under 16, adding Reddit and live-streaming platform Kick to the list of restricted platforms. This brings the total number of banned sites to nine, including Facebook, X, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, and Threads. Starting December 10, tech companies face fines of up to A$50 million ($32.5 million) if they fail to take ‘reasonable steps’ to deactivate existing accounts for minors and prevent new ones. The government emphasized that these platforms were selected because their primary or significant purpose is to facilitate online social interaction. More sites may be added as technology evolves. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, stated that delaying children’s access to social media allows them time to develop without exposure to harmful design features like opaque algorithms and endless scrolling. However, messaging services such as Discord and WhatsApp, gaming platforms like Lego Play and Roblox, and educational tools like Google Classroom and YouTube Kids are exempt. Federal Communications Minister Anika Wells defended the ban, asserting it aims to protect children from the ‘chilling control’ of online platforms. Critics, however, have raised concerns about data privacy and the reliability of age verification methods, which include ID documents, parental approval, and facial recognition technology. While polls show most Australian adults support the ban, some mental health advocates argue it could isolate children or drive them to unregulated parts of the internet. They suggest the government should focus on regulating harmful content and educating children about online risks. Notably, an Australian influencer family with millions of YouTube followers recently announced plans to relocate to the UK to circumvent the ban, ensuring their 14-year-old daughter can continue creating content. YouTube, initially exempt, was later included in the ban after the government cited it as the platform where children aged 10 to 15 most frequently encountered harmful content. Teens under 16 can still view YouTube videos but cannot create accounts, which are necessary for uploading or interacting on the platform.