作者： admin

In a high-level diplomatic meeting held in Beijing on Tuesday, China strongly criticized Japan for its recent provocative actions and statements regarding Taiwan, urging Tokyo to cease its interference in China’s internal affairs. The meeting, attended by Liu Jinsong, Director-General of the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s Department of Asian Affairs, and Masaaki Kanai, head of the Japanese Foreign Ministry’s Asian and Oceanian Affairs Bureau, highlighted growing tensions between the two nations. China demanded that Japan retract the controversial remarks made by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, who recently suggested the possibility of Japanese military intervention in Taiwan. This statement, made in Japan’s parliament on November 7, marked the first time an incumbent Japanese leader publicly broached such a sensitive topic. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning emphasized that Takaichi’s comments violate international law, undermine the one-China principle, and damage the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations. She called on Japan to take concrete actions to rectify its mistakes and provide a satisfactory response to the Chinese people. Observers noted that Japan’s refusal to retract the remarks reflects a broader strategy of balancing economic ties with China while pursuing political provocations. Additionally, Japan’s plan to revert the ranks of its Self-Defense Forces to pre-World War II names has drawn widespread criticism from Asian neighbors, who view it as a revival of militarism. Mao Ning condemned Japan’s recent security policy revisions, including lifting restrictions on weapons exports and reconsidering its Three Non-Nuclear Principles, warning against any attempts to challenge the post-WWII international order.

The UK Parliament is grappling with heightened concerns over Chinese espionage activities, following a series of warnings and incidents that have raised alarms among MPs and members of the House of Lords. The latest episode involves Simon Whelband, a Conservative councillor and staffer for MP Neil O’Brien, who was sanctioned by China in 2021. Whelband recently discovered an unsolicited LinkedIn message from an account named Shirly Shen, offering a job opportunity. Although the message appeared innocuous, Whelband reported it to Parliament’s security services, who advised him to block the account. This incident underscores a broader trend of Chinese operatives targeting parliamentary staff to gain insider insights. MI5 has identified two LinkedIn profiles allegedly used by Chinese security services as ‘civilian recruitment headhunters,’ aiming to solicit information from individuals in British politics. The security minister, Dan Jarvis, has acknowledged these concerns, emphasizing China’s low threshold for valuable information. The debate in the Commons has revealed widespread worries, including fears about Chinese-made buses equipped with ‘kill switches,’ military vehicles potentially acting as listening devices, and the construction of a new Chinese embassy in central London, which critics argue could serve as a spying hub. Despite these concerns, the UK government maintains a ‘pragmatic’ approach to China, recognizing the necessity of collaboration while being ‘clear-eyed’ about the risks. However, a growing number of MPs are advocating for a more skeptical stance, reflecting the complex and often conflicting dynamics of dealing with a superpower that is both essential and dangerous.

A groundbreaking initiative, the Anti-Zionist America Political Action Committee (Azapac), has launched a provocative video advertisement urging donations and volunteers to counter pro-Israeli lobbying groups in the United States. The campaign, led by former New York University professor and Libertarian Michael Rectenwald, has rapidly gained traction, amassing over 22,000 followers on X (formerly Twitter).

In the ad, Rectenwald criticizes the U.S. government’s perceived subservience to Israel, stating, ‘Our government acts like the servant of another country. That other country is, of course, the State of Israel.’ The video juxtaposes images of the Israeli flag outside U.S. Congressional offices with stark visuals of Palestinian casualties in Gaza, emphasizing the $33 billion in U.S. aid to Israel since October 7, 2023.

Azapac is already supporting two anti-Zionist candidates: Republican Aaron Baker in Florida, who aims to unseat long-serving Congressman Daniel Webster, and Independent Jose Vega in New York, challenging Democrat Ritchie Torres. The PAC’s mission is to challenge the dominant pro-Israel narrative in U.S. politics, which Rectenwald describes as ‘a national disgrace’ and ‘extortion.’

Political action committees (PACs) like Azapac are legally permitted to raise funds for or against candidates, with contributions capped at $5,000 per election cycle. In contrast, Super PACs like the American Israel Political Action Committee (Aipac) can spend unlimited amounts on advertising and voter outreach without direct contributions to candidates.

Azapac is not the first group to challenge Aipac’s influence. Last year, a coalition of over 20 progressive organizations formed Reject AIPAC to protect pro-Palestinian lawmakers from Aipac’s attacks. The coalition accused Aipac of advocating policies that violate human rights and international humanitarian law.

Rectenwald’s message resonates with growing criticism of Israel from both progressive and conservative circles, including supporters of Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again movement. ‘America isn’t a vassal state,’ he asserts. ‘We’re no one’s colony. If you’re done with the fear, done with our politicians taking bribes, then Azapac is your army.’

Middle East Eye, known for its independent coverage of the Middle East, has provided in-depth analysis of this development. For more information on republishing this content, visit their website.