作者: admin

  • US to screen for Ebola at airports, one American in DR Congo infected

    US to screen for Ebola at airports, one American in DR Congo infected

    The United States has rolled out new public health measures to block Ebola importation and spread, including mandatory airport screening for travelers from affected Central African regions, after a United States citizen working in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) tested positive for the deadly virus, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced Monday.

    The updated precautions come just after the World Health Organization (WHO) designated the ongoing Ebola outbreak in eastern DRC as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, the global body’s highest alert level for cross-border disease threats. During a press briefing, CDC Ebola response incident manager Satish Pillai confirmed that the infected American developed symptoms over the weekend and returned a positive diagnosis late Sunday. Medical teams are currently arranging to transfer the patient to Germany for specialized care, and six additional people who may have been exposed are being evacuated out of the region for mandatory health monitoring.

    There are currently 25 U.S. personnel based at the CDC’s DRC field office, and the agency is deploying an additional senior technical coordinator to support local response efforts at the request of global health partners. As of Monday, CDC officials assess the immediate risk of widespread Ebola transmission to the general U.S. public remains low. “We will continue to evaluate the evolving situation and may adjust public health measures as additional information becomes available,” the agency said in an official statement.

    Alongside expanded entry screening at all U.S. airports, the CDC has implemented new entry restrictions for non-U.S. citizens: any traveler who has visited the DRC, Uganda, or South Sudan in the 21-day incubation window for Ebola will be barred from entering the United States. The U.S. Embassy in Kampala, Uganda, has also temporarily suspended all routine visa services, with notifications already sent to all applicants impacted by the pause.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump noted Monday that he was concerned by the outbreak’s scale but added, “I think that it’s been confined right now to Africa.”

    As of Sunday’s official update from DRC Health Minister Samuel-Roger Kamba, the outbreak has been linked to 91 suspected deaths and roughly 350 suspected cases, with most infections recorded among people aged 20 to 39, and over 60% of cases affecting women. There is currently no licensed specific treatment or widely available vaccine for the Ebola strain driving the current transmission surge.

    The U.S. response has drawn criticism from global health experts, particularly in the wake of the Trump administration’s formal withdrawal from the WHO earlier this year. For weeks, current U.S. officials have declined to answer questions about how deep cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) – an organization that led coordinated response efforts during past Ebola outbreaks – have undermined current monitoring and containment work.

    CDC officials have pushed back on some criticism, emphasizing that the agency remains in close collaboration with international partners and local health authorities in affected countries. The new measures announced Monday include sustained deployment of CDC personnel to support outbreak containment, contact tracing of exposed individuals, and laboratory testing in affected regions. The U.S. State Department also announced Monday that it has mobilized $13 million in emergency funding to support immediate response operations.

    Still, Matthew Kavanagh, director of the Georgetown University Center for Global Health Policy and Politics, called the U.S. response to date “disappointing,” arguing that the new travel restrictions and entry screenings are “more theater than effective public health measures.” He noted that the Trump administration has long claimed it could replace WHO’s global outbreak response capacity with bilateral deals and domestic U.S. efforts, saying “This outbreak clearly shows that is a failed strategy.”

    During previous large Ebola outbreaks in Central Africa, coordinated action between USAID, CDC, and U.S.-funded non-profit organizations enabled rapid deployment of resources and swift containment of spread, Kavanagh explained. In contrast, “we’re weeks into an outbreak and only finding out about it after hundreds of cases and major spread including to the capital city of Uganda,” he said, adding that the current administration is “playing catch-up” to a rapidly evolving crisis.

  • ‘FedEx says your parcel has drugs’: The scam that trapped an Indian comedian

    ‘FedEx says your parcel has drugs’: The scam that trapped an Indian comedian

    In October 2024, Mumbai-based stand-up comedian Ankita Shrivastav received a routine phone call that would turn into an eight-hour ordeal of extortion and psychological manipulation, becoming a stark example of India’s exploding digital fraud crisis. The caller, claiming to represent FedEx, told Shrivastav that police had intercepted a package she had supposedly sent to Iraq containing illegal narcotics. The conversation quickly shifted to what scammers now call a “digital arrest”: the fraudsters connected her to two men posing as uniformed police officers over a video call, who ordered her to comply with their demands while her identity was being verified.

    For nearly a full workday, the fake officers controlled Shrivastav through her laptop camera: she was forbidden from turning off the device, leaving her home, or contacting any friends, family, or actual law enforcement. They bombarded her with detailed questions about her personal finances, bank accounts, and transaction history, repeatedly emphasizing the severity of the false charges and the legal trouble she would face if she did not cooperate. Speaking to the BBC, Shrivastav recalled the unrelenting pressure leaving her disoriented and emotionally drained, desperate to end the terrifying experience. By the time the scammers cut contact, she had authorized transfers totaling 900,000 Indian rupees, equal to roughly $9,300, only to realize minutes later that the entire operation was an elaborate scam.

    Like many scam victims, Shrivastav faced the added sting of judgment after the incident. “‘You’re educated, how did you get scammed?’ That is what everyone I told asked me,” she said, a question she has repeatedly asked herself. Shrivastav kept her experience private until April 2025, when she turned her trauma into a 30-minute stand-up set uploaded to her YouTube channel, designed to raise public awareness of how easily anyone can fall victim to these schemes.

    Shrivastav is far from alone in facing this type of cybercrime. New data from India’s National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) shows that cybercrime incidents rose nearly 18% year-over-year in 2023-2024, with total losses to digital fraud exceeding 220 billion rupees. Registered cybercrime cases hit 101,928 in 2024, a nearly 50% jump from just three years prior in 2021. Among the most common cons reported nationwide is the “digital arrest” scam, a rapidly evolving tactic where criminals impersonate police or government officials to falsely accuse victims of crimes, trap them in continuous video calls, and intimidate them into transferring funds.

    Digital scams extend far beyond fake arrests: fraudsters also deploy fake investment platforms, phishing emails and SMS messages to steal sensitive credentials such as one-time passcodes (OTPs) and account passwords, and increasingly use artificial intelligence to clone voices of loved ones or public figures to extract money. Experts note that while rising reported cases partly reflect improved reporting systems, the trend also underscores a dramatic shift in the nature of criminal activity in India. An editorial in *The Telegraph* framed the NCRB data as a reflection of “the emerging anxieties of a society that is being reshaped by technology, urbanisation and economic change,” noting that new forms of cybercrime are putting unprecedented pressure on India’s overstretched criminal justice system.

    For Shrivastav, that pressure has translated to little progress recovering her lost funds. After multiple trips to local law enforcement and banking institutions, she said she has yet to see any results: “The scammers were one step ahead of the police and bank authorities.” NCRB data supports her frustration: by the end of 2024, roughly 100,000 cybercrime cases remained stuck in the investigation pipeline, with close to 75,000 yet to go to trial.

    Indian authorities have not ignored the growing crisis. In 2020, the federal government launched the Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C), a national body that partners with domestic and international agencies to disrupt cybercrime networks. The government has also rolled out a dedicated 1930 cyber fraud helpline, an online portal for reporting and blocking fraudulent activity, run widespread public awareness campaigns, and updated data protection and technology laws to crack down on deepfake and AI-enabled voice scams. Most recently, Home Minister Amit Shah announced that I4C is collaborating with the Reserve Bank Innovation Hub to leverage artificial intelligence to identify and shut down “mule accounts” – the bank accounts and digital wallets scammers use to launder stolen funds while hiding their identity. India’s central bank is also currently drafting new regulatory measures to target digital scammers.

    Even with these interventions, cybercrime rates continue to climb. Journalist and author Soumya Gupta, who wrote *Bharat Bluff: Inside the cons of India’s internet revolution*, explains that the rapid expansion of internet and smartphone access across India has put hundreds of millions of new users at risk. Recent government data shows that more than 86% of Indian households now have internet access, but digital literacy initiatives have failed to keep pace with this boom. While public awareness campaigns and media reporting are slowly closing that gap, Gupta emphasizes that scamming relies far more on psychology than technology.

    In her writing, Gupta notes that scammers build schemes to exploit universal human vulnerabilities: fear, greed, core beliefs, and social connections. Once a victim is pulled into a scam, many struggle to extract themselves, either out of shame to admit their mistake or due to the sunk-cost fallacy that keeps them complying as more money is on the line. Scammers also closely track users’ online activity to craft personalized cons that feel credible and compelling to their targets.

    For Shrivastav, the scammers exploited two deep-rooted vulnerabilities: a cultural fear of police authority and a desire to protect her public reputation as a comedian. “From a young age, we’re taught to be afraid of the police and to obey authority. That ingrained fear overrode the alarm bells that were ringing in my brain,” she explained. “I was also eager to prevent any incident that would spoil my reputation among fans.”

    Sharing her story through stand-up comedy felt like a risky, vulnerable step – she worried audiences would judge her as foolish for falling for the scam. But she said the choice to go public was necessary: “I wanted people to know that if I – an educated, urban woman who considers herself to be street-smart – could get scammed, it could happen to anyone.”

    Gupta echoed Shrivastav’s call for caution, urging internet users to carefully protect their personal data online and follow two core rules: any offer that seems too good to be true almost certainly is, and if a situation feels off, stop all communication and reach out to a trusted source or official authority for help.

  • Three killed in San Diego mosque shooting, two attackers dead

    Three killed in San Diego mosque shooting, two attackers dead

    A horrific act of violence has shaken the Muslim community in Southern California, after a mass shooting at the region’s largest mosque left three people dead on Monday, with the two teenage attackers dying from self-inflicted gunshot wounds shortly after the assault, local law enforcement confirmed.

    According to San Diego Police Chief Scott Wahl, emergency dispatch received an active shooter call targeting the Islamic Center of San Diego — a sprawling worship complex that also hosts an adjacent school — and first responders arrived at the scene in just four minutes. When officers pulled up to the property, they immediately found three deceased victims lying outside the center’s main building. One of those killed has been confirmed as a security guard employed by the mosque, though the identities of the other two victims have not been released to the public as of Monday evening.

    Authorities also received follow-up reports of additional gunfire near the campus, where a local landscaper working in the area came under fire but escaped without injury. Law enforcement teams launched an immediate active shooter sweep of the mosque and the connected school, confirming that all staff, teachers and children inside the facility were unharmed. Following a short lockdown order that urged local residents to shelter in place, police announced the threat had been fully neutralized.

    Aerial television footage from the scene showed dozens of law enforcement patrol cars surrounding the mosque complex, with heavily armed response units congregating outside the main building and one person visible lying on the ground in a large pool of blood. A short distance from the worship center, officers found the suspects’ vehicle parked in the middle of a street, with the two attackers — a 19-year-old and a 17-year-old — dead inside from self-inflicted gunshot wounds. Chief Wahl confirmed that no officers fired their weapons during the response to the attack.

    Mosque imam Taha Hassane expressed shock and grief over the unprecedented attack on the community’s place of worship. “We have never experienced tragedy like this before. And at this moment all that I can say is, sending our prayers and standing in solidarity with all the families in our community here,” Hassane said. “It is extremely outrageous to target a place of worship.”

    Political leaders across levels of government have offered responses to the violence. Former U.S. President Donald Trump called the shooting a “terrible situation” during a press briefing, noting that he had received initial updates and would be reviewing the incident closely. California Governor Gavin Newsom was also briefed on the attack immediately after it unfolded, with his press office releasing a statement on social media platform X thanking first responders for their rapid work to secure the area and protect local residents, while urging the public to follow instructions from local law enforcement.

    The attack has prompted renewed conversations about religious-based violence and gun safety in the United States, as the San Diego Police Department continues to process evidence at the scene and investigate the motive for the assault on the Muslim community.

  • Why Elon Musk lost in the OpenAI court battle against Sam Altman

    Why Elon Musk lost in the OpenAI court battle against Sam Altman

    In a high-stakes legal showdown that has gripped the global tech industry, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has emerged on the losing end of his courtroom battle against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, rooted in a bitter dispute over the AI research lab’s dramatic transformation from a non-profit entity to a for-profit enterprise. BBC technology correspondent Lily Jamali was present inside the courtroom to observe the proceedings as Musk laid out his core allegation: that Altman had violated the terms of the original non-profit founding agreement that shaped OpenAI’s creation when he oversaw the company’s transition to a for-profit operating model.

    The conflict traces back to OpenAI’s founding in 2015, when it was launched as a non-profit research organization with a stated mission of developing artificial general intelligence that benefits all humanity. Musk was an early founding investor and board member, though he stepped down from the board in 2018 and eventually cut ties with the organization he helped bring to life. After OpenAI launched ChatGPT in 2022 and rapidly grew its user base and commercial valuation, Musk renewed his public criticism of the company, arguing that it had abandoned its original non-profit, public-benefit roots in pursuit of corporate profit.

    Musk’s lawsuit centered on the claim that Altman and other OpenAI leaders breached the binding founding contract that committed the company to remaining non-profit and open in its research activities. The legal battle has been closely watched across the technology sector, as it raises fundamental questions about the governance of high-stakes AI development, the fiduciary duties of founders of mission-driven tech organizations, and the balance between commercial innovation and public benefit in the rapidly growing AI industry. With the court’s ruling siding with Altman and OpenAI, the decision clears a key legal hurdle for the company as it continues its commercial expansion, while leaving Musk’s public campaign to hold OpenAI to its original founding mission without a legal victory.

  • Trump v Massie: Could president’s Republican nemesis survive $20m attack to oust him?

    Trump v Massie: Could president’s Republican nemesis survive $20m attack to oust him?

    As voters head to the polls for Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District Republican primary on Tuesday, the nation is watching one of the most explosive intraparty showdowns of the 2026 election cycle: a test of whether sitting Congressman Thomas Massie can defy former president Donald Trump and hold onto his seat. The contest has become a defining referendum on Trump’s unchallenged grip over the modern Republican Party, with national consequences for any other GOP lawmakers considering breaking with the party’s leader.

    The conflict between Massie and Trump stems from the Kentucky congressman’s repeated breaks with the White House on high-profile issues core to Trump’s agenda. Massie voted against Trump’s landmark 2025 tax and spending package, arguing it added trillions of dollars to the national debt; he backed efforts to roll back Trump’s tariffs on Canada; he supported measures to curtail Trump’s military operations in the Caribbean targeting suspected drug trafficking vessels and the ongoing U.S. military deployment in Iran. Most notably, Massie joined a bipartisan coalition that successfully pressured Trump’s own Department of Justice to release the full, unredacted files on deceased convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a move that infuriated the president.

    Trump’s response has been unrelenting. He has branded Massie with a barrage of vicious insults, calling him a “moron,” “lowlife,” “loser” and “major sleazebag,” even attacking other Republican politicians who dare to stand with the Kentuckian. When Colorado Congresswoman Lauren Boebert campaigned alongside Massie earlier this month, Trump called her “weak-minded” and “dumb” on his Truth Social platform, threatening to yank his endorsement of her re-election bid – a threat that carried little practical weight, as Colorado’s primary filing deadline had already passed, but sent a clear warning to any would-be dissenters. By March, Trump had handpicked his own challenger to unseat Massie: retired Navy Special Forces veteran Ed Gallrein, who has centered his entire campaign on being the president’s preferred candidate.

    The race has deepened divides within Kentucky’s local GOP, with officials and voters split sharply over Massie’s brand of uncompromising libertarian small-government conservatism. To his supporters, Massie is a principled lawmaker who keeps his word even when it costs him politically. “He’s one of the most consistent congressmen,” said Rex Morgan, a attendee of a Massie meet-and-greet in Shelbyville. “Even if it were to cost him his job, he will not go back on his word.” But to critics within the party, Massie’s intransigence is nothing more than political grandstanding, designed to grab media attention at the expense of the GOP’s broader agenda. With Republicans holding only a razor-thin majority in the House during Trump’s second term, Massie’s breaks have repeatedly delayed or derailed the president’s legislative priorities. “It’s not that you have to agree on every single issue, but at a certain point you’ve got to look at the big picture and say, how can we move this ball forward?” said Allen Volz, vice-chair of the Boone County Republican Party.

    Massie has walked a careful line to court the district’s deeply pro-Trump electorate – Trump won Kentucky’s 4th District by 35 points over Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election. He emphasizes that he has voted with the Trump administration 90% of the time, framing his occasional breaks as pushes to hold the Republican Party accountable to its small-government promises. “The problem we have is not that I’m voting against the Republican Party up there, it’s that the Republican Party up there is sometimes voting against Republican people back home. That’s the 10% of the time,” Massie explained at his Shelbyville event. He argues that his opposition to bloated spending packages improves final legislation, noting “the negotiation starts when one person says no. And if nobody says no, then you get the whole standing pile of crap.”

    By contrast, Gallrein’s campaign strategy has been straightforward: he leans entirely on Trump’s endorsement, printing it on yard signs, featuring it front-and-center on his website and social media, and making it the core of every ad buy. The former Navy SEAL, who owns a farm and events venue in Shelbyville, has run an unusually low-profile campaign: he has skipped nearly all primary debates, holds small, unannounced events, and declines almost all national media requests. “At the end of the day, Gallrein’s best argument is that Trump wants him,” said Trey Grayson, a former Kentucky secretary of state and Republican strategist. “I think their theory is there are enough folks for whom that’s enough that you get to 51%.”

    The race has attracted a raucous cast of national supporters on both sides, and has become the most expensive House primary in U.S. history, with total spending surpassing $32 million. Most of the outside money opposing Massie comes from three high-profile billionaires: Las Vegas casino magnate Miriam Adelson, and hedge fund managers Paul Singer and John Paulson, whose funding has been funneled through a pro-Trump super PAC called Kentucky MAGA and pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC, which opposes Massie’s criticism of U.S. military aid to Israel. Anti-Massie ads have flooded local airwaves, including one controversial spot that used artificial intelligence to generate fake images of Massie with progressive Democratic lawmakers Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar, falsely framing the trio as a threat to Trump’s agenda. Massie has fought back, outraising his opponent in large part thanks to a national grassroots donor base energized by his push for the Epstein files, and has run ads framing Gallrein as a puppet of wealthy special interests.

    As election day arrives, recent polling shows the race is a statistical dead heat. Political analysts note that Kentucky’s 4th District has demographic features that could work in Massie’s favor: it includes large swathes of more affluent, educated suburban voters around Louisville and Cincinnati, a demographic that is less reliably pro-Trump than the lower-income rural voters that have formed the core of the president’s recent base. Trump’s sagging national approval ratings, dragged down by rising gas prices and divisions within the GOP over his ongoing military campaign in Iran, also bolster Massie’s non-interventionist foreign policy brand. A Massie win would send shockwaves through the Republican Party, proving that it is possible for a sitting GOP lawmaker to break with Trump and survive. “A single house member going against the president of the US and prevailing?” said Grayson. “That’s a tell that maybe you can stand up and get away with it.” A loss for Massie, however, would cement Trump’s control over the party, sending a clear message that dissent from the president’s agenda will not be tolerated.

  • Students protest in Venezuela after deaths of political prisoner and his mother

    Students protest in Venezuela after deaths of political prisoner and his mother

    CARACAS, VENEZUELA – A solemn demonstration gripped Venezuela’s capital Monday, as dozens of protesters gathered to honor the life of Carmen Navas, an 82-year-old woman who died just days after finally learning her son had died in state custody nine months prior.

    Mostly made up of college students, the crowd staged a temporary blockage of a major Caracas highway, directing sharp blame at the Venezuelan government for both deaths: that of 51-year-old Víctor Hugo Quero, whose detention has been widely categorized as politically motivated, and his elderly mother Navas, who spent months searching for answers about her son’s fate. Chanting calls for accountability, protesters carried a large banner emblazoned with Navas’ portrait, and unified in slogans declaring “They didn’t die; they were killed!” and “Justice for Carmen!”

    Student leader Miguel Ángel Suárez summed up the public reaction to the pair’s deaths, noting, “What it stirs up in Venezuelans, in the Venezuelan youth, is rage.”

    The timeline of the tragedy stretches back to January 2025, when Quero was first taken into state custody. For nine months, Navas waged a relentless search for information: she visited detention facilities, courthouses, and multiple government agencies, repeatedly demanding confirmation that her son was alive. It was only 10 days before her own death that Venezuela’s prisons agency released an official statement confirming Quero had died in July, after being hospitalized for an underlying gastrointestinal issue while in custody.

    Per the government’s official account, Quero died of “acute respiratory failure secondary to pulmonary thromboembolism.” Officials attempted to justify the nine-month information blackout by claiming Quero had not provided emergency contact details for his family – a claim that has done little to quell public anger.

    The incident has sparked immediate condemnation from across Venezuela’s political opposition, local and international human rights groups, and family members of other people detained on political charges in the country. According to Foro Penal, a prominent Venezuelan prisoners’ rights organization, more than 400 people are currently being held in the country for politically motivated reasons.

    This development comes amid a string of ongoing political tensions across Latin America, with AP continuing full coverage of regional developments at its dedicated Latin America and the Caribbean hub.

  • Neymar picked for Brazil’s World Cup squad despite doubts on fitness

    Neymar picked for Brazil’s World Cup squad despite doubts on fitness

    RIO DE JANEIRO – In a surprise call-up that defied widespread local football pundit predictions, Brazil head coach Carlo Ancelotti has named 34-year-old star Neymar to the nation’s 26-man 2026 FIFA World Cup roster, locking in the forward’s spot for his fourth appearance at the global tournament. As Brazil’s all-time leading goalscorer with 79 international caps to his name, Neymar has faced an uphill battle to regain full match fitness since suffering a torn anterior cruciate ligament in his left knee back in October 2023. Since returning to his boyhood club Santos earlier this year, the forward has featured in 8 matches, notching four goals and two assists while working to build up match rhythm.

  • Selling children to survive: Afghan fathers forced to make impossible choices

    Selling children to survive: Afghan fathers forced to make impossible choices

    As the first pale light of dawn spreads over the dusty, arid streets of Chaghcharan, capital of Afghanistan’s hard-hit Ghor province, hundreds of jobless men already crowd the main square. They line the curbs, eyes scanning every passing vehicle, every potential passer-by, desperate for any day’s work that will put bread on their families’ tables. For most, this daily wait will end in disappointment. Forty-five-year-old Juma Khan is one of the lucky few: over the past six weeks, he has secured just three days of paid labour, earning between 150 and 200 Afghani – less than $3.20 – per day. His story lays bare the scale of the crisis unfolding across Afghanistan today. “My children went to bed hungry three nights straight,” Khan says, his voice heavy with despair. “My wife cried, my children cried. I had to beg a neighbour for money just to buy flour. I live in constant terror that my children will starve to death.”

    Khan’s agony is far from unusual. UN data paints an unthinkable portrait of crisis across the country: three out of every four Afghans cannot cover their most basic needs for food, shelter and healthcare. Unemployment has reached epidemic levels, what remains of the national healthcare system is teetering on collapse, and the international aid that once kept millions of Afghans alive has been slashed to a tiny fraction of its former volume. The country is now facing record-breaking famine risk: an estimated 4.7 million people – more than one-tenth of the entire population – are just one step away from catastrophic starvation.

    Ghor province sits at the epicentre of this disaster. In the daily job market in Chaghcharan, desperation hangs thick in the air. Rabani, another man waiting for work, says he received word days earlier that his children had gone without food for 48 hours. “I wanted to kill myself,” he says, his voice cracking with emotion. “But what good would that do my family? So I stay here, waiting for any work.” Seventy-eight-year-old Khwaja Ahmad can barely get a sentence out before he breaks down into sobs: “We are starving. My older children already died. I need work to feed the ones I have left, but I am too old – no one will hire me.”

    When a local bakery opens its doors and begins handing out stale bread to the waiting crowd, the loaves are torn apart in seconds, dozens of men scrapping for every crumb. Moments later, a chaotic rush erupts: a motorcyclist passes through looking for a single labourer to haul bricks, and dozens of men throw themselves toward him, desperate to be chosen. In the two hours reporters spent observing the square that morning, only three men were hired.

    A short drive from the square, across barren brown hills capped by the snow-capped peaks of the Siah Koh range, scattered mud homes tell the same devastating story. In one of these small dwellings, Abdul Rashid Azimi pulls his seven-year-old twin daughters Roqia and Rohila close, tears streaming down his face as he describes the unthinkable choice he has been forced to consider. “I am ready to sell one of my daughters,” he says. “I am poor, I am in debt, I have no other option. I come home after looking for work, hungry and parched and broken, and my children run to me asking for bread. What can I give them? There is no work anywhere. It breaks my heart, but this is the only way I can feed my other children.”

    Azimi’s wife Kayhan says their family survives on nothing but bread and hot water – they cannot even afford tea. Two of their teenage sons polish shoes in the town centre to earn pennies, while a third collects rubbish to burn for cooking fuel.

    Stories of child selling, once unthinkable in local communities, are now increasingly common. Saeed Ahmad already sold his five-year-old daughter Shaiqa two years ago, after the girl developed appendicitis and a liver cyst that required urgent surgery. “I had no money to pay for the operation,” Ahmad explains. “I sold her to a relative for 200,000 Afghani, roughly $3,200. I couldn’t take all the money at once – if I did, he would have taken her immediately. So I asked for just enough to cover her surgery, and arranged that he will take her in five years when he pays the rest. If I had any other option, I would never have done this. But if I didn’t, she would have died. This way, she gets to live, at least.” Shaiqa still lives with her father now, cuddling into his neck during the interview, but the clock is ticking down to her departure.

    Just two years ago, Saeed and his family, like millions of Afghans, received regular life-saving food aid – flour, cooking oil, lentils, and nutritional supplements for children. But steep, widespread cuts to international assistance over the past several years have stripped most Afghans of this support. The United States, once Afghanistan’s largest single donor, cut nearly all aid to the country last year, and other major donors including the United Kingdom have followed suit with deep cuts. UN data shows total aid received by Afghanistan so far this year is 70% lower than it was in 2025. A crippling multi-year drought, which has impacted more than half of Afghanistan’s 34 provinces, has only compounded the crisis, destroying crop yields and pushing millions of rural Afghans deeper into poverty.

    “We have received no help from anyone – not from the government, not from non-governmental organisations,” says local villager Abdul Malik.

    The Taliban government, which seized power in 2021 following the withdrawal of US and coalition foreign forces, blames the previous Western-backed administration for the current crisis. “During the 20 years of invasion, an artificial economy was built on an influx of US dollars,” Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesman for the Taliban government, told the BBC. “When the invasion ended, we inherited poverty, unemployment, and all of these problems.” Fitrat added that the government has plans to address the crisis through major infrastructure and mining projects that will create jobs and reduce poverty over time.

    But the Taliban’s own restrictive policies, particularly sweeping bans on women’s education, work, and public life, have been a major factor driving donor nations to cut assistance. When asked about this link, the government rejected responsibility, stating that “humanitarian assistance should not be politicised.”

    For millions of Afghans on the brink of starvation, long-term economic projects are too little, too late. The crisis is already killing hundreds of the most vulnerable – especially young children. A few weeks before reporters visited, Mohammad Hashem lost his 14-month-old baby girl to hunger and lack of medical care. “My child died because she was hungry and we had no medicine,” he says. “When a baby is sick and starving, what do you expect will happen?”

    Local elder says child mortality driven by malnutrition has risen dramatically in the past two years. There are no official death records kept in the province, but the local graveyard tells the story: reporters counted roughly twice as many small graves as adult ones, confirming the surge in child deaths.

    At Chaghcharan’s main provincial hospital, the scale of the crisis is impossible to miss. The neonatal unit, where sick newborns receive care, is overflowing: every bed is full, and some cots hold two underweight babies at once. Most of the infants are severely undernourished, and many cannot breathe on their own without oxygen support.

    When reporters visited, staff wheeled in a cot holding premature twin girls, born two months early to 22-year-old Shakila. One weighed just 2 kilograms, the other only 1kg. Both were placed immediately on oxygen, in critical condition. Their grandmother Gulbadan explained that Shakila had almost nothing to eat during her pregnancy, surviving on only bread and tea – that is why the babies were born so small and sick. A few hours after reporters left the hospital, the heavier of the two twins died before she could even be given a name. “The doctors tried everything, but she didn’t make it,” Gulbadan said the next day. “I wrapped her tiny body and brought her home. When her mother found out, she fainted. I just pray the other one survives.”

    Neonatal nurse Fatima Husseini says that on some days, up to three babies die in the unit. “When I started working here, it broke my heart every time a child died,” she says. “Now, it has become normal. We see it so often.” Dr Muhammad Mosa Oldat, head of the unit, says the infant mortality rate here reaches as high as 10% – a figure he calls “completely unacceptable.” “Every day, more and more malnourished babies are brought in, but we do not have the resources to treat them properly,” he says.

    In the paediatric intensive care unit, six-week-old Zameer is fighting for his life against meningitis and pneumonia – both easily treatable conditions, but the hospital has no MRI scanner to properly diagnose and manage his case. Even more shockingly, the public hospital does not provide most medications for patients: families have to buy all required drugs from private pharmacies outside, which most cannot afford. “Sometimes we can reuse leftover medicines from families that can afford them, for babies whose parents have no money,” Fatima says.

    Even when stabilised by hospital staff, most poor families cannot afford to keep their children in hospital for ongoing care. Gulbadan’s surviving granddaughter was gaining weight and her breathing had stabilised after a few days, but her family took her home because they could not pay for continuing care. Baby Zameer was also taken home by his parents for the same reason. Now, their tiny bodies will have to fight for survival on their own, with no medical support to help them.

  • ‘Like madmen’: Palestinian family attacked in their sleep by Israeli settlers

    ‘Like madmen’: Palestinian family attacked in their sleep by Israeli settlers

    In the pre-dawn darkness of Sunday, a brutal assault by dozens of Israeli settlers upended the life of the Shalalda family in the al-Daraja region, just east of the West Bank city of Hebron, leaving four family members injured and deepening a long-running pattern of settler intimidation designed to push Palestinians off their ancestral land.

    The attack began around 3 a.m., when Mohammed Shalalda, who was sleeping on the roof of his family’s decades-old home, woke to the sound of intruders. Before he could fully register what was happening, more than 15 settlers dragged him from his sleeping spot, beating him repeatedly with kicks and wooden clubs even as his blood soaked the ground.

    “I started screaming to wake the residents and rescue me, but the settlers put a blanket over me and continued beating me violently. I was bleeding, and I didn’t know where the bleeding was coming from; my whole body was their prey,” Shalalda told independent outlet Middle East Eye in an interview after the assault.

    During the beating, the settlers repeatedly demanded Shalalda tell them where the family’s sheep were kept. When he answered the family had no sheep present that night, they intensified the attack, spraying tear gas directly into his face from canisters they had brought to the scene.

    Hearing his brother’s screams from inside the home, 36-year-old Amer Shalalda rushed outside to intervene. The settlers turned on him too, beating him severely before tying a rope around his neck. Seeing his brother being attacked, a badly injured Mohammed Shalalda shouted at the group, prompting one settler to pull a knife from his pocket and stab Shalalda in the leg — the same leg that was targeted in a previous settler attack.

    As neighbors attempted to intervene, the number of attacking settlers grew, eventually splitting into five separate groups of at least 10 people each. Inside the home, 60-year-old Suad Shalalda and her 20-year-old daughter Arwa, who had been woken by the screams of Mohammed and Amer, initially hid inside, too afraid of being attacked to venture outside. Their safety did not last, however: the settlers soon stormed the home, ransacking every room.

    Arwa Shalalda grabbed her phone to call for emergency help, but a settler snatched the device from her hand before she could make a call. When Suad Shalalda pushed the intruder away to protect her daughter, he shoved her forcefully into a wall, cutting her head open when her skull struck the plaster. Another settler struck Arwa in the head, leaving a deep gash, before the group sprayed gas directly into the women’s faces, targeting their eyes. Before leaving, the settlers smashed all mobile phones they found in the home to eliminate any evidence of the attack.

    Eventually, a growing crowd of local residents gathered to chase the settlers off the property. The attackers fled before they could steal the family’s livestock, but not before leaving a trail of injury and destruction across the home.

    The Shalalda family has lived and worked as livestock farmers in al-Daraja for more than 35 years, but they have faced repeated, near-fatal attacks from Israeli settlers seeking to claim the land for settlement expansion. Despite the violence, the family says they have no intention of leaving the only home they have ever known.

    “There’s no leaving from here. We have nowhere else to live but this area where we built our homes, raise our sheep, and make our living from farming. This attack is not the first against us, and it won’t be the last,” Mohammed Shalalda said. Suad Shalalda added that leaving would only achieve the goal of far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, whose policies have enabled and encouraged settler harassment of Palestinian communities across the West Bank. “They were like madmen, wreaking havoc in the house. I didn’t know what to do,” she told Middle East Eye.

    Al-Daraja is an open rural agricultural area on the eastern edge of Sair, bordering desert grazing lands, and holds strategic value for its fertile farmland, designated grazing areas, and historic herding routes. In recent years, and especially since October 2023, the eastern districts of Sair — including al-Daraja, Wadi Sair, and Jorat al-Khail — have emerged as major flashpoints for rising settler violence, as groups push to expand existing settlement outposts and the nearby formal settlements of Asfar and Kodovim.

    Settlers in the region have carried out a systematic campaign of intimidation to force Palestinian communities out: they block farmers and herders from accessing their land, remove residents at gunpoint from grazing areas and agricultural roads, set fire to olive, almond, and grape orchards, cut down mature trees with chainsaws, steal livestock, and harass Bedouin and pastoral communities to pressure small Palestinian population centers to relocate.

    Data from a recent report by the Palestine Liberation Organisation’s (PLO) Department of Labour and Planning underscores the dramatic surge in this violence. The report recorded 799 separate attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians and their property in April 2025, representing a 135% increase compared to the same month in 2024. Between the start of 2025 and early May, 18 Palestinians have been killed by settlers, most from gunshot wounds. In April alone, there were 37 separate shooting attacks targeting Palestinians, settlers uprooted or destroyed 2,414 Palestinian-owned trees, and stole or slaughtered 488 head of livestock belonging to local farmers. Settlers also damaged 53 vehicles by arson and stone throwing, burned and destroyed five Palestinian homes, agricultural facilities, and service structures near Jerusalem and Nablus, and attempted to establish 20 new settlement outposts in April — the highest number of new outpost attempts recorded in a single month.

    As of the end of 2024, approximately 778,000 Israeli settlers reside in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank, alongside an estimated 3.4 million Palestinians, according to United Nations data. The surge in settler violence has been widely linked to the expansionist policies of Israel’s current far-right government, which has relaxed restrictions on settler activity and formalized dozens of previously unauthorized outposts.

  • MPs question lack of action on hate speech at Tommy Robinson’s anti-Muslim rally

    MPs question lack of action on hate speech at Tommy Robinson’s anti-Muslim rally

    A mass far-right rally organized by notorious convicted extremist Tommy Robinson in central London has sparked widespread outrage across British Muslim communities and political circles, with critics slamming the UK government for its failure to publicly denounce virulent anti-Muslim rhetoric delivered from the event’s main stage.

    Held Saturday and drawing an estimated crowd of 60,000 attendees, the “Unite the Kingdom” rally was led by Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known by his pseudonym Tommy Robinson — a far-right activist with a long rap sheet that includes convictions for violence, fraud, and contempt of court. Footage captured at the event captured Robinson making a series of inflammatory, anti-Muslim remarks: he told attendees he would “stop Islam” if he took national power, called for a mass “remigration” policy that would force ethnic and religious minorities out of the country, and demanded the military be deployed to remove migrants from government-funded accommodation hotels. Robinson went even further, declaring publicly that “it’s time for many Muslims to leave this country,” and urged the gathered crowd to prepare for what he framed as a coming “battle of Britain.”

    Robinson was not the only speaker to spread anti-Muslim animus at the rally. Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, who goes by the name Posie Parker and leads a small fringe group called the Party of Women, told the crowd that “it is not too late to get Islam out of every single official office in this country… we have to remove Islam from every single place of authority.” In a widely condemned stunt, three members of French anti-Islam far-right group Collectif Nemesis took the stage wearing full burqas as a deliberate mockery of Muslim women who choose to wear the Islamic veil. Alice Cordier, the group’s founder, told the crowd the movement stands “alone against the system that wants to destroy our Christian civilisation,” doubling down on the group’s open anti-migrant and Islamophobic ideology.

    In the aftermath of the rally, Muslim civil society organizations and cross-party political figures have launched sharp criticism of the UK government, which has not issued any formal condemnation of the anti-Muslim remarks made from the stage. While Prime Minister Keir Starmer did criticize the rally in advance of the event, warning “I will not let the likes of Tommy Robinson use their hate to drag our country backwards,” no senior minister has publicly addressed the specific hate speech delivered during the gathering.

    Independent Member of Parliament Ayoub Khan, speaking to independent news outlet Middle East Eye, rejected attempts to frame the remarks as ordinary heated political debate, arguing that the comments amounted to open, public anti-Muslim agitation. “Any government that fails to respond decisively to such rhetoric is failing in its basic duty to protect equal citizenship and public safety,” Khan said. “Ministers cannot claim to oppose extremism while remaining silent as an entire minority community is demonised in plain sight.”

    Fellow MP Iqbal Mohamed echoed that criticism, noting that speakers faced no immediate pushback from the government after calling for the exclusion of Muslims from public life, demanding Muslims leave the country, and mocking Muslim women’s religious clothing. “That tells you all you need to know about this government’s stated commitment to combatting Islamophobia,” Mohamed said, adding that political leaders have a clear responsibility to speak out consistently and take meaningful action against all forms of bigotry, including anti-Muslim hate.

    Baroness Shaista Gohir, a member of the House of Lords and CEO of Muslim Women’s Network UK, condemned the burqa mocking stunt as a deliberate act of public humiliation. “It was deliberate humiliation of Muslim women and a public display of anti-Muslim hostility aimed at dehumanising visibly Muslim women and reducing their religious dress to a source of ridicule and contempt,” Gohir said. “Such stunts have a direct and harmful impact on the safety and well-being of Muslim women.”

    Leading national Muslim organizations have amplified these calls for action, demanding the Metropolitan Police launch a full investigation into the rally speakers’ comments as potential incitement to religious hatred. The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), the UK’s largest umbrella group for Muslim communities, said Robinson’s remarks were not protected political speech — they were criminal incitement. The group questioned why this virulent hate targeting Muslims is tolerated, when comparable rhetoric directed at any other minority community would almost certainly result in prosecution and immediate political condemnation.

    The Muslim Engagement and Development Initative (Mend) also condemned the rally’s rhetoric as incitement to religious hatred and violence against British Muslims, and announced it would file a formal request with the Metropolitan Police to obtain the force’s internal legal assessment explaining why no rally speakers had been arrested on hate crime charges. Thus far, Metropolitan Police have confirmed 20 total arrests were made at the rally, nine of which were for alleged hate crimes — but none of those arrests targeted the event’s featured speakers.

    The criticism over government silence comes amid ongoing scrutiny of UK policing and political responses to protests, with critics pointing to a stark contrast in how the government and police handled a simultaneous pro-Palestine Nakba Day march also held in London the same day. Three arrests were made at the pro-Palestine gathering: one for carrying a sign reading “Globalise the intifada” (a slogan recently criminalized under UK public order law), a second for a sign reading “We will not surrender, victory or martyrdom,” and a third for displaying support for Palestine Action, a direct action group the government banned as a terrorist organization last year.

    Ahead of the far-right rally, the government had announced it had barred 11 foreign far-right agitators from entering the UK to attend the event, including high-profile Colombian-American anti-Muslim campaigner Valentina Gomez. Middle East Eye, which first reported on the post-rally criticism, has reached out to the Metropolitan Police for comment on the calls for an investigation into the rally speakers’ remarks, and had not received a response as of publication.