作者: admin

  • River water smashed into tunnel and chased me for 20 minutes, Nepal worker tells BBC

    River water smashed into tunnel and chased me for 20 minutes, Nepal worker tells BBC

    Last week, catastrophic flash floods swept through river valleys across Nepal, triggering a deadly collapse at a hydropower construction tunnel along the Trishuli River that left hundreds of workers missing and thousands dead. In harrowing first-person interviews with the BBC, surviving workers have shared their accounts of the terrifying moments that unfolded when river water breached the tunnel they were building.

    Pemba Dundu Tamang, one of the workers who narrowly escaped the rushing floodwaters, was part of a 30-person crew pouring concrete lining inside the tunnel when the disaster struck. The first sign of trouble, he recalled, was an unexpected, violent gust of wind that ripped through the tunnel, sending splintered plywood flying through the air and shaking loose large construction equipment. Outside the tunnel mouth, nearby riverside homes had already been torn from their foundations and swept away by the surging water.

    “I ran toward the tunnel entrance,” Tamang described. “The water was chasing behind me and I was running ahead of it.” For 20 minutes, he fled uphill, with the deluge nipping at his heels, until he emerged from the tunnel disoriented and numb with shock. By the time he reached safety, the devastating reality of what he had lost began to sink in.

    Tamang lost six members of his family—including his mother, older brother, sister-in-law, and three young nieces and nephews—who were staying at their riverside home when the flood hit. Only his wife, son, and one nephew survived the disaster. His colleague Itha Ghale suffered an equal loss, losing eight family members including his mother and eldest daughter; only Ghale, his wife, and three sons survived. “I feel life is meaningless now. Surviving feels miserable. I do not know where to eat or where to go,” Tamang said. “The dead are at peace. It is those of us who survived who suffer.”

    Beyond the personal toll on these workers, the disaster has brought widespread devastation across Nepal. Official counts put the national death toll at more than 1,000, with roughly 4,000 people still unaccounted for. Hundreds of the missing are hydropower workers like Tamang, who were employed across a sprawling network of construction tunnels for hydropower projects running along the Trishuli River, which generates over 99% of Nepal’s total electricity supply.

    Tamang and Ghale were working on the Upper Trishuli 3B Hydropower Project, a major facility scheduled to come online in 2027 that was designed to reuse water from an upstream plant to add additional capacity to Nepal’s national energy grid. Around 50 to 60 workers escaped the tunnel with Tamang, but dozens more remain trapped inside, he said.

    Nepal’s military has launched a large-scale search-and-rescue operation across the affected region, with crews pumping air into submerged and blocked tunnels to sustain any potential survivors still trapped. Soldiers have also been assigned to recover bodies and implement public health measures to prevent the spread of waterborne disease in the flood aftermath. “We are focused on search-and-rescue efforts at the tunnels, our work is continuing,” Nepal Army spokesman Raja Ram Basnet told AFP.

    International teams of specialists from China, India, and Nepal are also on-site, operating heavy excavators and clearing tonnes of debris to reach trapped workers at multiple hydropower construction sites. Tamang, who took shelter in the nearby village of Shanti Bazar for two days before military rescuers reached him, says he holds out hope for the colleagues still trapped. “There are probably still some survivors inside. I would be happy if they were rescued quickly,” he said. “I know many people who are still trapped there.”

    The disaster has also sparked new discussion about disaster preparedness in Nepal’s mountainous, flood-prone river valleys. A new analysis by an international coalition of mountain hazard experts—including researchers from the Asian Mountain Academic Alliance, the Stimson Centre, and China’s Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment—found clear warning signs of impending instability in the upstream glacier in the days before the flood triggered the disaster.

    Satellite imagery captured before the event showed the glacier surface was accelerating, meltwater had changed to a sediment-heavy brown colour, and a large crack was forming in the surrounding rock—all clear indicators that a collapse and downstream flood was imminent. While the avalanche that triggered the flood moved too quickly to warn communities immediately upstream, experts say a functioning early warning system would have given 10 minutes or more of warning to downstream communities and construction sites—time that could have saved hundreds of lives. Tamang echoed this assessment, saying more lives could have been saved if adequate emergency resources had been in place before the flood hit.

    As the search continues for missing workers and flood victims, survivors like Tamang are left grappling with the loss of their families and uncertain futures. Many, including Tamang, fear that if the damaged hydropower projects are shuttered indefinitely, they will be left without work and unable to feed their surviving families. “If things continue like this, we will go hungry,” Tamang said. “Sometimes I feel it would have been better not to survive.”

  • ‘I have fired 40 of my agents for being corrupt’, says Nigeria’s anti-corruption chief

    ‘I have fired 40 of my agents for being corrupt’, says Nigeria’s anti-corruption chief

    Nigeria’s top anti-graft watchdog has carried out a major internal clean-up, removing more than four dozen of its own employees over allegations of corruption and financial misconduct in the three years since current leadership took office. The announcement came from Ola Olukoyede, chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), during a public briefing in the nation’s capital Abuja, where he outlined the agency’s progress and structural reforms since he assumed leadership in October 2023.

    According to Olukoyede, more than five of the dismissed staff have already been formally charged and are facing prosecution in court, while investigative case files are still being compiled for the remaining terminated employees to move forward with legal proceedings. The EFCC, Nigeria’s primary agency tasked with probing financial crimes including advance fee fraud, money laundering, and public sector corruption, regularly pursues high-profile cases against sitting politicians, senior public officials, prominent business leaders, and other figures accused of diverting or misappropriating public funds.

    In comments to reporters at the briefing, Olukoyede confirmed the scale of internal accountability measures, noting that he had personally authorized the dismissal of over 40 staff members over his three-year tenure over proven charges of corruption and financial malpractice. As part of a broader package of internal reforms to strengthen ethical standards across the agency, Olukoyede revealed that the EFCC’s existing Department of Internal Affairs has been formally rebranded as the Department of Ethics and Integrity, to reflect its renewed mandate of upholding professional integrity within the commission.

    To further mitigate risks of conflicts of interest and improper influence, the EFCC has also introduced a new mandatory policy regulating gifts and hospitality received by agency staff. The new rule requires all EFCC officers to formally declare any gifts received that exceed an undisclosed monetary threshold, a requirement that extends even to gifts sent by relatives living outside of Nigeria.

    Olukoyede emphasized the non-negotiable need for internal probity in the agency’s anti-corruption mission, stating: “You must be sure that your hands are clean. You can’t be fighting corruption when your hands are soiled with corrupt practices.” When the BBC reached out to the EFCC to request additional details on the specific allegations against the dismissed former employees, the agency declined to release further information, noting the data was not currently available for public disclosure.

    Beyond internal reforms and staff dismissals, Olukoyede highlighted a string of strong enforcement outcomes achieved during his tenure, announcing that the EFCC had recovered a record 1.23 trillion naira (equivalent to approximately $925 million or £683 million) in stolen funds, with an overall conviction rate for prosecuted cases exceeding 75% between October 2023 and July 2026.

    Breaking down the agency’s operational output, Olukoyede reported that over the 33-month period, the EFCC received 49,673 public petitions alleging financial crimes, completed investigations into 39,615 separate cases, filed 14,476 formal charges with the courts, and secured 10,872 criminal convictions. In the first half of 2026 alone, the agency secured 1,370 convictions from just 1,889 filed cases, a result Olukoyede said demonstrates the commission’s improving efficiency and focus on evidence-based prosecutions.

    “These results reflect diligence, resilience and a prosecutorial approach anchored on evidence and courtroom outcomes,” he added. Data presented at the briefing also revealed a shifting priority in the EFCC’s caseload, with a growing share of investigations now focused on cybercrime and cyber-enabled fraud, alongside traditional corruption cases involving high-profile public officials.

  • US borrowing costs hit fresh highs over inflation fears

    US borrowing costs hit fresh highs over inflation fears

    Renewed military strikes in the Middle East have sent global oil markets into volatility, pushing crude prices above $92 per barrel and amplifying long-running concerns about sticky U.S. inflation. This geopolitical and economic pressure triggered a fresh surge in U.S. government borrowing costs on Tuesday, with the 10-year Treasury yield – the benchmark effective interest rate for U.S. government borrowing – climbing to 4.79%, its highest point since January 2025.

    Beyond impacting how much the federal government pays to access capital, movements in the U.S. bond market have far-reaching ripple effects across the domestic economy. Benchmark Treasury yields directly shape the interest rates consumers pay for everyday forms of borrowing, including home mortgages, auto loans, and credit card balances. Already, 30-year fixed mortgage rates have jumped to nearly 6.7%, a one-year high, following the recent bond market selloff.

    The sharp uptick in borrowing costs has coincided with growing market speculation that the U.S. Federal Reserve will greenlight a new interest rate hike when it meets later this month. Persistent above-target inflation has left policymakers open to further tightening, with top Fed officials signaling that stubborn price growth could force decisive action.

    In a public speech delivered Tuesday, Federal Reserve Governor Michael Barr emphasized that inflation has remained unacceptably elevated for five years. “If it does not cool, then I think we should act decisively to raise rates,” Barr warned. His remarks echoed comments made the previous week by Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh, who told attendees that policymakers would “have work to do” if they cannot confirm that cost-of-living pressures are easing for U.S. households.

    Latest official inflation data puts annual price growth at 3.4% as of July, a full 1.4 percentage points above the Federal Reserve’s longstanding 2% target. Despite this overshoot, the central bank has held its benchmark policy rate steady for months at a range of 3.5% to 3.75%. While Warsh has declined to elaborate on his personal outlook for rate policy, shifting investor expectations following recent official comments have pushed the probability of a September rate hike sharply higher.

    For bond markets, persistent inflation is the core driver of rising yields – the term used to describe the effective interest rate governments pay to investors who buy their debt. When governments issue bonds, they are essentially selling interest-bearing IOUs to raise capital for public spending. Bond investors routinely demand higher yields when inflation is high or projected to stay elevated, to offset the eroding impact of price growth on their future returns. Since U.S. Treasury yields serve as a global benchmark for borrowing, this shift pushes up borrowing costs across nearly every major economy worldwide.

    Inflation is not the only factor weighing on bond investors. Growing anxiety over ballooning government debt levels across the world, paired with uncertainty over the future returns of Big Tech’s massive artificial intelligence investments, has also put upward pressure on yields. In the U.S. specifically, total national debt has crossed the $40 trillion threshold, doubling over the past 10 years under both the Trump and Biden administrations.

    Last week, 30-year Treasury yields reached levels not seen since 2008, prompting a policy response from the Treasury Department. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that the U.S. government would expand debt buyback programs in an effort to cool rising rates. However, the positive market reaction to the announcement faded quickly, leaving yields to resume their upward climb.

    Economists warn that the sustained rise in borrowing costs carries meaningful downside risks for U.S. economic growth. Higher interest rates make both consumer borrowing and business investment less attractive. If households pull back on discretionary spending and companies pause expansion plans in response to elevated rates, the broader economy could slow sharply, tipping the balance between cooling inflation and triggering a downturn.

  • Vance calls Michigan Senate candidate El-Sayed ‘evil’ at campaign rally

    Vance calls Michigan Senate candidate El-Sayed ‘evil’ at campaign rally

    A heated Michigan Senate campaign has devolved into raw personal confrontation this week, after U.S. Vice President JD Vance delivered a blistering attack on Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed at a campaign rally for Republican nominee Mike Rogers in suburban Detroit Monday night. Vance, a close ally of former President Donald Trump, labeled the 41-year-old Muslim candidate “a very, very evil” person seeking to “destroy” the United States, framing El-Sayed as a divisive extremist who represents a dangerous rising force in American politics.

    The vice president’s tirade came after El-Sayed made controversial remarks about Vance’s family, specifically suggesting that Vance’s late grandfather would not accept Usha Vance, the Hindu Second Lady and Vance’s wife. Addressing that comment directly, Vance issued a sharp public warning: “keep my wife’s name the hell out of your mouth.”

    Vance also sought to tie El-Sayed to far-left streamer Hasan Piker, who once claimed the U.S. “deserved” the 9/11 terrorist attacks. El-Sayed appeared alongside Piker during his primary campaign, but has repeatedly denied sharing Piker’s views and publicly distanced himself from the 9/11 comment. Undeterred, Vance repeated unsubstantiated insinuations that El-Sayed sympathizes with terrorists and aligns with anti-American ideology, claiming the candidate sided with attackers over victims of a shooting at a Detroit-area synagogue.

    Within hours, El-Sayed pushed back forcefully against Vance’s accusations during an interview with CNN, turning the “evil” label back on the Trump administration’s policy agenda. He argued that the real harm facing American communities comes from what he called the Trump White House’s unethical policy choices: “Evil is ripping healthcare away from working people in exchange for tax breaks for billionaires. Evil is making people pay more for groceries and gas while pushing for trade wars and actual war. Evil is dividing people for your own gain. Evil is selling out your morals for a little bit of power.”

    El-Sayed also moved to clarify his earlier comments about Usha Vance, explaining that his remarks were never intended as a personal attack. Instead, he said, they were meant to illustrate what he frames as Vance’s core political belief: that some people are inherently “more American than others” based on their identity or background.

    The contest between El-Sayed and Rogers, a long-time former law enforcement official and seasoned political figure, has already become one of the most closely watched races of the 2026 midterm elections. Michigan is a critical battleground state: it went to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election, and flipped back to Donald Trump in 2024, making this Senate seat a key target for both major parties as they fight for control of the upper chamber.

    A recent poll released by Michigan-based research firm Epic-MRA shows the race remains tight, with El-Sayed holding only a narrow four-point lead over his Republican opponent ahead of the general election. The rapid escalation of personal hostility between the candidates has underscored the deep polarization that continues to shape competitive electoral contests across the U.S. ahead of 2026’s voting.

  • Germany blames Russia for last month’s attempted drone attack at Leipzig airport

    Germany blames Russia for last month’s attempted drone attack at Leipzig airport

    BERLIN — In a significant escalation of diplomatic tensions between Berlin and Moscow, the German government formally announced Tuesday that it holds Russia directly responsible for an attempted explosive drone attack at Leipzig/Halle Airport last month, a key logistics hub critical to Western military and humanitarian support for Ukraine.

    The foiled plot first came to light on the evening of August 4, when security personnel discovered an explosives-laden drone positioned near a Ukrainian-owned aircraft parked at the airport. Bomb disposal experts successfully carried out a controlled defusion of the device before it could be detonated, preventing potential mass casualties and major infrastructure damage.

    German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt told reporters the botched attack aligns with a well-documented pattern of aggressive covert activity that Western officials have labeled “Russian hybrid operations.” “The German government has conducted a thorough investigation and comes to the clear conclusion that Russia is responsible for the hybrid attack in Leipzig on August 4,” Dobrindt stated.

    In response to the alleged plot, Berlin has announced sweeping retaliatory diplomatic measures. Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul confirmed that the Russian consulate general in Bonn will be shut down permanently, effective September 18. Additionally, the operating contract for the Russian House, a prominent Russian cultural center located in central Berlin, will be terminated immediately.

    Leipzig/Halle Airport is far more than a standard commercial cargo hub: it serves as a primary logistics gateway for Western support to Ukraine, and regularly hosts Ukrainian Antonov transport aircraft that carry military and humanitarian aid into the war-torn country. It also hosts the NATO Strategic Airlift International Solution (SALIS) program, which conducts near-daily operations moving military equipment to NATO battle groups deployed along the alliance’s eastern flank, stretching from Finland in the north to Romania in the south, while also supporting mission deployments for both the EU and individual NATO member states.

    This is not the first time the airport has been targeted in suspected sabotage linked to Russia. In 2024, an incendiary device detonated at an on-site logistics center, igniting a fire in a freight container that was preparing to be loaded onto a cargo plane bound for Ukraine. Western security officials have long suspected that attack was coordinated by Russian intelligence services.

    For years, Western governments have accused Moscow of running a coordinated continent-wide campaign of sabotage, covert attacks, and disruptive activities across Europe. The core goal of this campaign, officials say, is to erode public and political support for Ukraine in the face of Russia’s full-scale invasion, and to destabilize political and social order within European Union and NATO member states. Moscow has repeatedly denied all accusations of involvement in sabotage activities across Europe.

  • Man Utd fail in attempt to sign Ait-Nouri from Man City

    Man Utd fail in attempt to sign Ait-Nouri from Man City

    On the final day of the summer transfer window, Manchester United saw two high-stakes, last-minute attempts to strengthen their squad collapse, leaving the Premier League side empty-handed in their late push to address defensive and midfield depth gaps.

    For weeks leading up to the deadline, United’s coaching staff under manager Michael Carrick had prioritized shoring up the left-back position, an area identified as a key squad weakness. After ruling out moves for Barcelona’s Alejandro Balde and Racing Santander’s Jorge Salinas, with less than 12 hours remaining before the window closed, United pivoted to a surprise target: Algerian full-back Rayan Ait-Nouri from cross-city rivals Manchester City.

    United exclusively explored a loan arrangement for the 25-year-old, ruling out any permanent purchase up front. However, Manchester City’s only acceptable terms for a temporary exit included a mandatory obligation to buy Ait-Nouri at the end of the loan spell — a condition United rejected outright. City later confirmed that Ait-Nouri would remain at the Etihad Stadium for the current season.

    Ait-Nouri joined City from Wolverhampton Wanderers for a £31m transfer fee in June 2025, but his debut campaign at the club fell short of expectations. He made just 12 starts in Premier League play and 31 total appearances across all competitions, and currently sits third in Enzo Maresca’s left-back depth chart, behind starter Josko Gvardiol and young prospect Nico O’Reilly. He has been named to the matchday squad for all three of City’s opening 2026/27 fixtures but has yet to take the pitch this season.

    Notably, a completed transfer for Ait-Nouri would have made him the first player to move directly between the two Manchester rivals for an agreed transfer fee in more than 27 years. The last such direct transfer saw Terry Cooke leave United for City for a £1m fee in January 1999. In recent decades, only Owen Hargreaves and Carlos Tevez have made the cross-city switch, both joining City after their United contracts expired — Tevez’s arrival famously included City’s provocative “Welcome to Manchester” publicity campaign that stoked the already fierce rivalry between the clubs.

    United’s failure to land an experienced new left-back has forced a last-minute change of plans for the club’s own young prospect, 19-year-old Harry Amass. Amass served as backup to first-choice left-back Luke Shaw through most of pre-season, but has not been named to Carrick’s matchday squad for either of United’s opening two Premier League games. He had been widely expected to leave on a loan deal to gain first-team minutes, but will now remain at Old Trafford to provide defensive cover. He is still expected to be third in the depth chart, however, after Noussair Mazraoui filled in for the injured Shaw during United’s 5-2 opening weekend win over Ipswich Town.

    Alongside the collapsed Ait-Nouri deal, United also saw their pursuit of highly-rated 18-year-old Leicester City midfielder Louis Page fall through. United’s interest in Page, who plays in England’s League One with the Foxes, was first revealed by BBC Sport back in August, but the writing was on the wall for the deal when Leicester named Page in their starting line-up for a league fixture against Plymouth Argyle on transfer deadline day itself. Multiple sources later confirmed the transfer would not be completed, and Page will remain at Leicester for the coming season.

    Leicester held firm on their valuation of the teenage prospect, demanding more than £10m to sanction the sale. Page only made his senior first-team debut in August 2025, but has already earned a strong reputation after 25 first-team appearances for the club. It was widely understood that United had planned to loan Page straight back to Leicester for the remainder of the season to continue his development, as the Red Devils have already spent more than £150m on senior international midfield reinforcements this summer.

    United’s new midfield signings Youri Tielemans and Andrey Santos have already made their debuts for the club, while £70m summer addition Carlos Baleba, signed from Brighton & Hove Albion, will miss the next two weeks of action with a minor ankle injury.

  • Watch: Judge orders deadlocked Clancy jurors to keep deliberating

    Watch: Judge orders deadlocked Clancy jurors to keep deliberating

    A high-profile homicide trial in Massachusetts has hit a procedural snag, after a jury announced it was unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the case against Lindsay Clancy. Clancy, a 32-year-old Massachusetts woman, stands accused of murdering her three young children in a tragic 2023 incident that unfolded in the basement of the family’s suburban home.

    Following days of deliberation that saw jurors fail to bridge their divides on a final verdict, the presiding judge made the rare decision to direct the deadlocked panel to return to closed-door deliberations in an effort to find consensus. Court observers confirmed that the instruction came after the jury sent a note to the judge indicating they were stuck and could not agree on a guilty or not guilty finding.

    The case has gripped local communities across the state, with the brutal nature of the alleged crimes sparking widespread public discussion about domestic violence, maternal mental health, and access to psychiatric care for at-risk parents. Legal analysts note that while directing deadlocked jurors to continue deliberating is within a judge’s discretionary authority, the move often raises questions about whether a mistrial will ultimately be declared if the panel remains at an impasse. As of the latest court update, jurors have resumed their deliberations, with the public awaiting a final outcome in one of the most tragic criminal cases the region has seen in recent years.

  • Frances hits Shein and Temu with fast fashion fees

    Frances hits Shein and Temu with fast fashion fees

    France has officially implemented a landmark tiered levy on ultra-fast fashion apparel this week, a regulatory move designed to rein in the growth of budget e-commerce clothing giants while addressing the sector’s well-documented environmental harms. The new fee structure, which entered into force on Tuesday, was authorized by a national law passed this past June that specifically targets major players in the ultra-fast fashion space, including China-linked brands Shein, Temu and AliExpress.

    Ultra-fast fashion, a business model defined by rapid production of low-cost, trend-driven clothing that encourages frequent consumer turnover, has come under growing fire from European policymakers for its outsized carbon footprint, textile waste generation, and unfair competition with traditional apparel retailers. French officials argue that the low price points of these e-commerce giants have spurred a dramatic surge in disposable clothing consumption across the country, amplifying environmental damage at a time when France is pushing for broader sustainability reforms in the fashion industry.

    The legislation defines ultra-fast fashion based on two core metrics: the total volume of clothing a retailer places on the French market each year, and the cost of repairing a damaged garment relative to its original purchase price. The per-item levy scales upward based on how a brand performs against both criteria, with initial 2026 fees ranging from just €0.50 for basic underwear to €2 for cotton T-shirts, €9 for denim jeans, and €12 for outerwear jackets. By 2030, the maximum per-item fee is set to rise to nearly €20, though the levy will be capped at 50% of a garment’s pre-tax retail price to avoid excessive cost increases for low-budget items.

    Notably, the French government confirmed in July that the levy will not apply to established European fast fashion retailers such as H&M and Zara, a carve-out that has drawn criticism for appearing to favor domestic and regional industry players while targeting foreign e-commerce brands. China’s Ministry of Commerce has already pushed back against the law, labeling it discriminatory, a non-tariff trade barrier, and a potential violation of core World Trade Organization (WTO) trading principles.

    Mathieu Lefevre, the French minister leading the regulatory push, has defended the policy, emphasizing that the environmental and economic harms of the ultra-fast fashion model are already widely recognized by climate and industry experts. The rollout of the levy comes at a pivotal moment for Shein, the largest of the targeted brands, which just completed its initial public offering (IPO) on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The company closed its first day of public trading with a valuation of $26.2 billion, a sharp drop from the nearly $100 billion valuation it commanded in private funding rounds just a few years ago. Shein has faced mounting headwinds in recent years, including intensifying global competition, ongoing trade tensions between China and Western nations, and persistent scrutiny over the ethical standards of its global supply chain.

    In a statement to the BBC ahead of the levy’s implementation, Shein argued that the targeted regulation would have a direct negative impact on household budgets across France. At a time when French consumers are already grappling with the ongoing fallout from the global cost-of-living crisis, the company said the new fees would only further erode ordinary shoppers’ purchasing power. Temu, another Chinese-owned e-commerce platform that has faced widespread criticism from policymakers in the United States and United Kingdom, has pushed back against being categorized as an ultra-fast fashion brand. A Temu spokesperson told the BBC that the company acknowledges the importance of the environmental goals behind France’s new legislation, but noted that Temu operates as a third-party online marketplace rather than a clothing manufacturer, and therefore does not fit the definition of an ultra-fast fashion retailer. AliExpress has not yet issued a public comment on the new levy as of Tuesday’s implementation. The policy is widely seen as a test case for broader European Union regulation of ultra-fast fashion, with Brussels currently drafting its own region-wide rules to curb the sector’s environmental impact.

  • A series of heatwaves leads Britain to record its hottest summer

    A series of heatwaves leads Britain to record its hottest summer

    LONDON – The United Kingdom’s national weather service has confirmed that the country’s 2026 summer, a season defined by back-to-back blistering heatwaves, widespread drought, and destructive wildfires, stands as the hottest ever recorded in British history. Provisional data from the Met Office, which has tracked temperature trends across the nation since 1884, shows this summer shattered the previous record set just one year prior.

    The mean average temperature for summer 2026 hit 16.5°C (61.7°F), eclipsing 2025’s average of 16.1°C (61°F). That 2025 reading had itself broken the prior record of 15.7°C (60.2°F) set in 2018, marking an accelerating pattern of record-breaking heat that climate scientists tie directly to anthropogenic climate change. Alarmingly, all five of the hottest summers recorded in the U.K. have occurred since 2003.

    “These records are now breaking with increasing frequency, reflecting the influence of human-induced climate change,” said Amy Doherty, head of the Met Office’s National Climate Information Center. “Particularly notable is how much we’ve exceeded the previous summer mean temperature record, set just last year.”

    Met Office climate modeling quantifies the stark impact of human greenhouse gas emissions: researchers calculated that fossil fuel pollution and other human-caused warming have made an extreme hot summer like this one 130 times more likely than it would be in a pre-industrial climate. Without human emissions, a summer this hot would be expected to occur roughly once every 1,000 years. Today, that same level of heat is projected to occur once every nine years on average.

    Heatwaves began plaguing the U.K. as early as late May, with recurring heat events striking every month through the end of summer, including two separate heatwaves in July alone. The extreme heat brought tangible, devastating harms across the country. The U.K. Health Security Agency estimates that 2,877 excess deaths in England were linked to the May and June heatwaves. A June 26 high of 38°C (100.4°F) in Norfolk set a new record for the hottest June temperature ever recorded in the region, while the year’s overall peak temperature hit 38.1°C (100.6°F) in London on August 13.

    Regional temperature breakdowns show England, Wales, and Northern Ireland all set new mean summer temperature records. Scotland bucked the trend, recording its sixth-warmest summer on record, with cooler and wetter conditions than the rest of the U.K. Even with the milder conditions in Scotland, the impacts of the persistent heat and lack of rainfall remain widespread: all of Wales and the vast majority of England are still experiencing official drought conditions months after the heatwave season began.

    “Our hottest summer ever is a brutal reminder that we’re not waiting for climate change to arrive in Britain; we’re living in the middle of it,” said Katie White, the U.K.’s Minister of Climate Transition. “With kids too hot to sleep, families worrying about older relatives, farmers watching fields dry out, and firefighters and our armed forces battling wildfires, we’ve all woken up to a reality none of us wants for the people and places we love.”

  • Exclusive: British Museum’s Bayeux Tapestry sponsor backs Israeli defence tech fund

    Exclusive: British Museum’s Bayeux Tapestry sponsor backs Israeli defence tech fund

    When the British Museum opened its doors to the public on Thursday morning, it launched what has been billed as the most anticipated exhibition in its 273-year history: the first display of the Bayeux Tapestry on English soil in almost a century. The 70-meter medieval embroidery, which chronicles the 1066 Norman Conquest of England, has been housed in France since the Middle Ages, and British negotiators have worked to secure a temporary loan of the fragile artifact since 1931. After nearly 100 years of diplomatic efforts, the tapestry finally arrived in London this summer under heavy security, with an 11-month exhibition run planned.

    Demand for tickets has been unprecedented: all allocations for the exhibition’s first four months sold out within hours on the single busiest sales day in the museum’s history, drawing projections that hundreds of thousands of visitors will view the work before it returns to France. This landmark cultural event would not have been possible without a £5 million ($6.75 million) sponsorship from Igor Tulchinsky, founder, CEO and chair of U.S.-based investment firm WorldQuant, who was named the exhibition’s official sponsor in February. Tulchinsky, who maintains a low public profile, stood alongside senior dignitaries including King Charles III, French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham at the exhibition’s official opening reception last week, where the leaders viewed the tapestry through its protective security casing. A fundraising gala in Tulchinsky’s honor is scheduled to take place at the museum next month to recognize his support.

    But new revelations about Tulchinsky’s lesser-known business interests have sparked fierce backlash and renewed ethical scrutiny of the British Museum, which has already faced intense criticism in recent years over its removal of Palestinian heritage references from its galleries and its history of controversial corporate partnerships. In April, two months after Tulchinsky signed on to sponsor the tapestry exhibition, he launched WorldQuant Genesis, a Tel Aviv-based venture capital fund focused on early-stage defense technology startups. The fund is led by retired Israeli Major General Saar Tzur, who stepped down from his senior command posts leading the Israeli military’s Northern Corps and Manoeuvre Array in October 2024, just one year into Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza that has been accused of genocide by multiple human rights and legal bodies.

    Following his retirement from the military, Tzur joined the advisory board of Ottopia, an Israeli technology startup that provides remote control technology for unmanned military vehicles deployed by the Israeli army in Gaza. In public statements on Ottopia’s website, Tzur has described these teleoperated vehicles as critical “force multipliers” for Israeli operations in Gaza, noting that the technology allows soldiers to carry out combat operations without putting troops at risk. Ottopia markets its technology as “battle proven” in direct combat and target engagement, counting remote-controlled bulldozers and explosive-laden armored personnel carriers (APCs) among its products. Company founder Amit Rosenzweig has confirmed that these explosive APCs have been supplied to Israeli forces operating in Gaza, explaining that operators can control the vehicles from a safe location using a joystick.

    Human rights groups have directly linked the widespread use of these remote-controlled explosive vehicles to widespread civilian casualties, mass displacement, and systematic destruction of civilian and cultural infrastructure in Gaza. According to Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, Israel first deployed these vehicles in densely populated residential areas of Gaza in May 2024, with use intensifying that October as part of the Israeli military’s “Generals’ Plan” to depopulate and forcibly displace all residents from northern Gaza. Between August and October 2025, the group recorded that Israeli forces deployed an average of 15 explosive remote vehicles per day, dropping an estimated 100 tonnes of explosives on residential neighborhoods monthly and destroying roughly 300 residential units every day. Gaza residents describe the blasts from these vehicles as far more destructive than conventional airstrikes, with entire multi-story buildings reduced to fine rubble in seconds, forcing mass panic and displacement.

    While an October 2025 ceasefire agreement paused large-scale use of the vehicles, Euro-Med Monitor has documented a renewed escalation in their deployment across northern and eastern Gaza over the past two months. While the group has not been able to independently confirm that the vehicles it has documented use Ottopia technology, it notes that the vehicles match the description of systems marketed by the firm and Tzur. Beyond civilian harm, the widespread use of these weapons in populated areas has put Gaza’s millennia-old cultural heritage at severe risk. While no direct hits to heritage sites from these vehicles have yet been recorded, multiple iconic heritage sites—including the Old al-Omari Mosque, the Byzantine Church of Jabalia, and al-Sheikh Saad Mosque—are located in areas where large-scale vehicle operations have taken place, and have sustained damage from adjacent attacks. Euro-Med Monitor estimates that more than 70% of Gaza’s total documented cultural heritage sites have already been destroyed or damaged during the current conflict, a pattern the group says matches the definition of cultural genocide laid out in a recent UN report.

    Tulchinsky has publicly confirmed his longstanding support for Israel and the Israeli military, noting that he has provided direct financial donations to the Israeli military since the start of the war in October 2023, and that WorldQuant has maintained an office in Israel since 2009. “Even against the backdrop of the complex reality, my commitment to Israel and its future remains intact,” he said in a statement following the launch of WorldQuant Genesis, which has already invested in Israeli defense tech startup NavAiro, which develops counter-drone technology for the military. There is no proven direct link between Tulchinsky’s fund and Ottopia, but campaigners say Tulchinsky’s clear ties to the Israeli defense industry that has overseen the destruction in Gaza make his sponsorship of a major cultural institution deeply unethical.

    Artists for Palestine UK, a leading network of cultural workers and artists, has called the British Museum’s decision to accept Tulchinsky’s sponsorship “outrageous” and “shameful.” “How can the museum’s trustees possibly have come to the conclusion that Tulchinsky, with his links to the ongoing erasure of Gaza and parts of Lebanon, was a suitable sponsor?” the group said in a statement. “And, more fundamentally, how are basic ethical standards, human rights and international law not guiding factors in such decisions, even before considerations of reputational damage?”

    This is not the first time the British Museum has faced criticism over its sponsorship choices: the institution previously drew widespread protests for accepting a £50 million 10-year sponsorship deal from fossil fuel giant BP to fund its major masterplan redevelopment. It also faces ongoing calls from UK Members of Parliament for an investigation into its removal of multiple references to Palestine from its public galleries. The Guardian also recently revealed that the museum hosted a private preview of the Bayeux Tapestry for Peter Thiel, the billionaire founder of Palantir, a U.S. tech firm that provides advanced AI and data analysis tools to the Israeli military. Neither the British Museum, WorldQuant nor Ottopia have responded to multiple requests for comment from Middle East Eye on the revelations.