作者: admin

  • North Korean leader Kim backs China’s push for ‘multipolar world’ in talks with foreign minister

    North Korean leader Kim backs China’s push for ‘multipolar world’ in talks with foreign minister

    Diplomatic relations between North Korea and longtime ally China are entering a fresh period of deepened cooperation, following high-level talks in Pyongyang that saw North Korean leader Kim Jong Un publicly align with Beijing’s core policy priorities amid shifting global geopolitics, North Korea’s state-run Korean Central News Agency confirmed Saturday.

    During Friday’s closed-door meeting with visiting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Kim made clear that Pyongyang unreservedly supports China’s efforts to safeguard its territorial integrity under the long-held one-China principle — Beijing’s formal stance that Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory. The North Korean leader also laid out Pyongyang’s positions on a range of unspecified regional and global issues of shared concern, stressing that steady, expanded development of bilateral ties has grown far more critical in today’s tense geopolitical climate, KCNA reported.

    Wang, who is wrapping up a two-day official trip to North Korea, noted that the bilateral relationship has advanced to a “new phase” following the 2023 summit between Kim and Chinese President Xi Jinping. This visit marks Wang’s first trip to Pyongyang in seven years, and he held preliminary in-depth discussions with North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Sun Hui on Thursday focused on expanding cooperation, rebuilding people-to-people exchanges, and aligning views on key global affairs. Neither North Korean nor Chinese state media have publicly disclosed whether talks covered U.S. policy or the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

    The high-profile engagement aligns with Kim’s long-running diplomatic strategy: by embracing the vision of a multipolar global order and rejecting what he frames as U.S.-led unipolar hegemony, the North Korean leader has worked to break years of international isolation by strengthening ties with major powers at odds with Washington. While Russia has emerged as Kim’s top foreign policy priority in recent years — with Pyongyang supplying thousands of troops and large stockpiles of weapons to support Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine — Kim has simultaneously moved to rebuild closeness with China, the North’s historical primary ally and most important economic lifeline.

    Last September, Kim joined Chinese President Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin for a World War II commemoration in Beijing, where he held his first summit with Xi in six years, a move designed to frame Pyongyang as a core member of a unified bloc countering U.S. influence. Just last month, the two Asian neighbors completed the first stage of restoring cross-border travel connectivity, resuming direct flights and passenger train services that had been completely suspended at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

    Wang’s trip to Pyongyang comes ahead of a widely anticipated rescheduled summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, set to take place in Beijing in May. Some South Korean officials have expressed cautious hope that the U.S.-China talks could open a new diplomatic pathway to engage Pyongyang. Kim has cut off all substantive dialogue with Washington and Seoul since the 2019 collapse of his nuclear diplomacy with Trump during the U.S. leader’s first term. In the years since, Kim has adopted an uncompromising hard-line stance toward South Korea — which he now labels North Korea’s “most hostile” adversary — and has repeatedly rejected U.S. offers to restart talks, demanding that Washington drop its requirement for North Korean denuclearization as a precondition for any negotiation.

  • Trump has handed JD Vance his most difficult mission yet

    Trump has handed JD Vance his most difficult mission yet

    Against the backdrop of a six-week Iran war that has roiled the Middle East and sent shockwaves through the global economy, U.S. Vice President JD Vance finds himself at the center of the most high-stakes diplomatic challenge of his tenure, leading American peace talks with Tehran in Islamabad, Pakistan. What has made his already difficult mission even more complex? A lighthearted off-script joke from President Donald Trump during a White House Easter lunch that laid bare the vice president’s awkward, high-risk predicament.

    “If the deal doesn’t go through, I’m blaming JD Vance,” Trump quipped to the room of senior administration officials, including Vice President (then Secretary of State) Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, drawing laughter. Then he added the punchline that underscored Vance’s no-win starting position: “If it does happen, I’m taking full credit.”

    The mission Vance now leads is nothing short of a political minefield. To reach a lasting end to the conflict that erupted in late February, Vance must reconcile the competing demands of mutually distrustful stakeholders spanning three continents. At the top of the list is Trump himself, a mercurial commander-in-chief who has flip-flopped between calling for rapid peace and threatening to wipe out Iran’s entire civilization. Just days before the current temporary ceasefire, Trump demonstrated his volatile negotiating style: he gave Iran a 24-hour deadline to reach a deal, took to Truth Social to warn that “a whole civilization will die” if Tehran refused, and then announced the ceasefire less than two hours before his escalation deadline expired. Even Vance openly described the current truce as “fragile,” a framing that diverged from the president’s more upbeat messaging.

    Beyond Trump, Vance must win buy-in from a weakened but still defiant Iranian regime that retains critical leverage through its control of the Strait of Hormuz, a key global energy chokepoint. He also has to assuage Israeli concerns over a regional ceasefire, convince war-weary European allies that have refused to assist in reopening the strait to back the deal, and keep the hawkish wing of Trump’s Make America Great Again base satisfied – all while positioning himself for a potential 2028 presidential run.

    What makes this assignment particularly tricky for Vance is that it cuts directly against his long-stated foreign policy positions. A former Iraq War Marine, Vance has long opposed endless U.S. military entanglements abroad. As recently as the eve of the Iran war, he told The Washington Post that Trump would never allow the U.S. to be dragged into another permanent Middle East conflict, and he reportedly voiced deep private skepticism about launching strikes on Iran before the war began. “Vance has signaled a desire for restraint in American foreign policy. That’s pretty hard to square with the American war against Iran,” explained Jeff Rathke, president of the Washington-based American-German Institute.

    Despite these public and private misgivings, Trump hand-picked Vance to lead the delegation, which also includes veteran special envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who led preliminary indirect talks before the ceasefire. Some observers have questioned whether the choice was intentional, handing Vance a potentially unwinnable assignment that would damage his political future if talks collapse. But a senior anonymous U.S. official countered that Vance was selected to signal the administration’s seriousness about reaching a durable deal, a framing that has been welcomed by regional allies. “It shows that America is seriously coming to the table,” noted Assaf Orion, a retired Israeli brigadier general.

    Vance has been actively positioning himself as a core loyalist and key enforcer of Trump’s “America First” foreign policy agenda since taking office. He made international headlines with a blistering takedown of European immigration and free speech policies at the 2025 Munich Security Conference, and he instigated a high-profile shouting match with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office over U.S. aid. Just this week, he made an unprecedented appearance in Hungary to campaign for re-election for Trump ally Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, cementing his reputation as a sharp-elbowed global proxy for the president.

    Still, at 41 years old and just a few years removed from his entry into national politics as a U.S. Senator, Vance remains a relative newcomer to high-level international diplomacy. Unlike Witkoff and Kushner, he was not involved in the detailed preliminary talks between the U.S. and Iran, and Orion notes that the pair’s workload across simultaneous negotiations over Ukraine, Iran and Gaza raises questions about technical expertise on the ground in Islamabad.

    Before departing Washington for Pakistan, Vance sought to tamp down overblown expectations, telling reporters: “If the Iranians are willing to negotiate in good faith, we are certainly willing to extend an open hand.” He added that Trump had provided the negotiating team with “some pretty clear guidelines,” though the president’s well-documented tendency to reverse course leaves Vance exposed: if Trump accepts a deal only to backtrack later, the vice president will likely shoulder the blame.

    As U.S. allies around the world watch closely to see if Vance can deliver, the question hanging over the Islamabad talks remains open: can Vance pull off a deal that satisfies all competing parties, or will he become the fall guy if negotiations collapse? For Vance, the outcome will not only shape the future of the Middle East and the global economy, but also his own prospects of leading the country in 2028. As Trump put it shortly before Vance departed: “He’s got a big thing. We’ll see how it all turns out.”

  • Safe to go in the water? State’s real-time shark warnings

    Safe to go in the water? State’s real-time shark warnings

    Coastal safety has received a digital upgrade in South Australia, with state authorities launching an updated real-time online shark sighting service designed to keep beachgoers, fishers and water sports enthusiasts informed of potential risks before they enter the ocean.

    Managed by the state’s Department of Primary Industries and Regions (PIRSA), the revamped platform empowers members of the public to submit firsthand shark sighting reports that are published instantly for the community to access. To maintain data accuracy, PIRSA staff conduct post-submission reviews to filter out duplicate entries and false reports, ensuring the information available to users remains reliable.

    In a public statement announcing the update, PIRSA emphasized that the platform’s core improvement is its accessibility: it now makes it far simpler for anyone spending time on or near the coast to stay updated on recent shark activity in their local area. The agency encouraged community participation, noting that prompt reporting from members of the public helps keep all coastal visitors safe. To make reporting even more convenient, QR code stickers linking directly to the reporting page have been placed at dozens of high-traffic coastal locations and selected local tackle shops.

    Since the upgraded service went live, multiple confirmed and unconfirmed sightings have already been submitted by both community members and South Australia Police. The most recent entry, filed at 12:30 p.m. on April 10, documented an unidentified shark spotted off the coast of Aldinga by a law enforcement officer. Earlier sightings include a suspected thresher shark seen at Port Moorowie on April 7, and a potential great white shark spotted near Robe on South Australia’s Limestone Coast on April 5.

    The launch of this new public safety tool comes just days after a high-profile shark incident that highlighted the need for better real-time information sharing. Over the Easter weekend, 16-year-old surfer Oliver Tokic-Bensley was bitten by a shark at Middleton Beach. Speaking to Australian Broadcasting Corporation News after the attack, Tokic-Bensley said he considered himself extraordinarily fortunate to avoid catastrophic injury. “I felt something sharp, I sort of jumped when it got me and then I kicked my foot away and luckily it didn’t hold onto me,” he recalled, noting he escaped without losing his foot.

  • Watch the Artemis II re-entry: Separation, blackout, then splashdown

    Watch the Artemis II re-entry: Separation, blackout, then splashdown

    After a landmark 10-day journey around the Moon, the four-person crew of NASA’s Artemis II mission has successfully completed their voyage and returned safely to Earth, capping off a critical milestone in humanity’s push to return humans to the lunar surface. The final phase of the mission unfolded in a carefully choreographed sequence that space agencies and space enthusiasts around the world watched in real time.

    Before the crew could touch down back on our planet, the spacecraft first executed its planned separation maneuver, detaching the crew capsule from the service module that had supported the vehicle through its deep space voyage. This separation is a critical step that clears the way for the capsule’s atmospheric entry, and mission controllers confirmed the maneuver happened exactly as planned.

    Following separation, the capsule entered the period of communications blackout that is standard for all atmospheric re-entry from deep space missions. As the vehicle streaks through Earth’s atmosphere at hypersonic speeds, friction with atmospheric particles creates an intense layer of ionized gas around the capsule that blocks all radio signals, leaving mission controllers on the ground waiting anxiously for contact to be restored. For those watching the live broadcast of the mission’s conclusion, this 10-minute period of silence built palpable tension, even though engineers had run countless simulations to confirm the capsule’s heat shield could withstand the 2,800-degree Celsius temperatures generated during re-entry.

    When the blackout ended and signals from the capsule reconnected with ground control, the room at NASA’s mission control center erupted in applause. The capsule then deployed its parachute system in stages, slowing from hypersonic speed to a gentle descent before making a smooth splashdown in the Pacific Ocean, as planned. Search and rescue teams were already on station to retrieve the crew and the capsule, and initial reports confirm all four astronauts are in good health.

    This mission marks the first crewed voyage around the Moon in more than 50 years, since the final Apollo mission in 1972. It serves as a final full test of NASA’s Space Launch System rocket, Orion capsule, and all supporting systems before the Artemis III mission, which is planned to land the first woman and first person of color on the lunar surface. Data collected during Artemis II will help engineers refine designs for future lunar landings and lay the groundwork for long-term lunar exploration and eventual human missions to Mars.

  • Artemis II mission was a triumph. Now comes the hard part

    Artemis II mission was a triumph. Now comes the hard part

    NASA’s Artemis II mission has made history, delivering a flawless 10-day mission that carried four astronauts on a circumlunar flight around the Moon’s far side and returned the crew safely to Earth. The Orion spacecraft exceeded performance expectations throughout the journey, and the stunning high-resolution imagery captured by the crew has reignited widespread public excitement, particularly among young people, about the future of human deep-space exploration. But this milestone immediately raises a pressing question: will the children now captivated by Artemis actually get to see humans live and work on the Moon in their lifetimes, or even travel to Mars, as the broader Artemis program promises? While it may sound pessimistic, the reality is that a single circumlunar loop was always the relatively straightforward step. The massive, unprecedented engineering and logistical challenges that come next leave the answer to that question very much open: it could happen, or it might not.

    This is not the first time the world has stood on the cusp of a new era of lunar exploration. When Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first humans to walk on the Moon in July 1969, widespread public expectation held that this was just the beginning, that permanent lunar outposts and regular crewed missions to deep space would follow quickly. That future never materialized, because the Apollo program was never rooted in a long-term commitment to exploration—it was a product of Cold War geopolitics, designed explicitly to prove U.S. technological superiority over the Soviet Union. Once that goal was achieved with Armstrong’s iconic “one small step,” the program lost its political momentum. Just a few years after the first landing, public interest plummeted, television viewership for subsequent Apollo missions dropped off sharply, and all remaining planned lunar landings were canceled mid-program.

    Today, NASA says its ambitions are fundamentally different. Under current administrator Jared Isaacman, the agency has laid out an ambitious roadmap: the first crewed Artemis lunar landing will take place in 2028, followed by one landing per year after that. By the fifth Artemis mission, scheduled for the end of 2028, NASA plans to begin assembling the first long-term lunar base, developed in partnership with international space agencies including the European Space Agency (ESA). Josef Aschbacher, ESA’s Director General, frames this long-term vision as a scientific and economic certainty. “The Moon economy will develop,” he says. “It will take time to set up the various elements, but it will develop.”

    Yet for all the grand plans, the program already faces significant headwinds, to paraphrase the famous line from Apollo 13’s commander: “Houston, we’ve had a problem.” To put the first boots back on the lunar surface since 1972, NASA relies on two private contractors to build next-generation lunar landers: Elon Musk’s SpaceX, which is developing a 35-meter tall lunar variant of its Starship rocket, and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin, which is building the more compact but equally ambitious Blue Moon Mark 2 lander. Both programs are running well behind their original schedules, according to a stark March 10 report from NASA’s own Office of Inspector General.

    The report found that SpaceX’s lunar Starship is at least two years behind its original delivery target, with additional delays widely expected. Blue Origin’s Blue Moon is no less troubled: it is already at least eight months behind schedule, and nearly half of the design issues flagged in a 2024 review remain unresolved more than a year later. These new landers are a world away from the tiny Apollo-era Eagle module that carried just two astronauts to the lunar surface in 1969, only large enough for a short surface stay to collect rock samples before returning to Earth. The new generation of landers must carry massive amounts of infrastructure: scientific equipment, pressurized rovers capable of supporting long-duration exploration, and the core initial components for the lunar base itself.

    Moving this much mass to the lunar surface requires unprecedented amounts of propellant—far more than can be launched on a single rocket. To solve this problem, the Artemis program plans to build an orbital propellant depot in Earth orbit, which would be refilled by more than 10 separate tanker rocket launches over the course of months. The concept is elegant on paper, but executing it is extraordinarily difficult. Keeping super-cold liquid oxygen and methane stable in the vacuum of space, then transferring them between multiple spacecraft, is one of the most demanding engineering challenges in the entire program.

    Dr. Simeon Barber, a space scientist at the Open University, notes that Artemis II itself was delayed twice this year before launch, all due to problems with fueling on the ground. “If it’s difficult to do on the launch pad, it’s going to be much more difficult to do in orbit,” he points out. The next major milestone, Artemis III, is scheduled for mid-2027, and is designed to test how the Orion crew capsule docks with one or both landers in Earth orbit. But given that SpaceX’s Starship has yet to complete a successful orbital test flight, and Blue Origin’s heavy-lift New Glenn rocket has only managed two launches to date, Barber describes the 2027 target as “a very steep ask.”

    NASA’s decision to stick to a 2028 target for the first crewed landing is partially driven by political considerations. The deadline now aligns with the current U.S. administration’s space policy, which requires an American crew back on the lunar surface by 2028, a timeline that falls within the current presidential term. Independent analysts almost universally reject the 2028 target as unrealistic, but Congress has backed the date with billions of dollars in taxpayer funding, in large part because of a new geopolitical competitor in lunar exploration: China.

    Over the past two decades, China has emerged as a global economic and military superpower, and its space capabilities have expanded at a dramatic pace. China has publicly committed to landing its own taikonaut on the lunar surface by around 2030, with a far simpler technical approach than NASA’s plan: China uses two rockets, carrying a separate crew module and lander, and avoids the complex in-orbit refueling that is a core part of the Artemis architecture. If Artemis slips as widely expected, China could beat the U.S. back to the lunar surface.

    Beyond the Moon, the long-term goal of sending humans to Mars looms large. Elon Musk has publicly said he intends to put the first humans on Mars before the end of the 2020s, but most independent experts agree that the earliest feasible timeline for a human Mars landing is the 2040s. The challenges of a Mars mission dwarf even the hardest problems of lunar exploration: the journey alone takes seven to nine months, exposing the crew to lethal levels of deep space radiation with no possibility of a rescue mission if something goes wrong. Mars’s thin, unpredictable atmosphere makes landing a full-sized crewed spacecraft, then launching it back to Earth, an engineering problem of almost unimaginable complexity.

    Even with all these delays and challenges, Artemis II has indisputably put human deep-space exploration back on the global agenda. Private space companies are building new rockets and landers with unprecedented urgency, and international partners are actively debating the depth of their long-term engagement. A drive around the Kennedy Space Center following the Artemis II launch makes that shift tangible: new facilities built by Blue Origin, ongoing construction of SpaceX infrastructure, all clustered near the historic NASA centers that sent the first Apollo missions to the Moon. This new public-private partnership marks a fundamental shift in how human spaceflight is organized, and even if timelines slip, it has already restored NASA’s pioneering momentum that faded after the Apollo era.

    As ESA astronaut Alexander Gerst told Aschbacher after returning from a mission on the International Space Station, the view of Earth from space changes everything. Gerst said he wished every one of the eight billion people on Earth could go to space just once, to see the small, fragile, beautiful blue planet that we all share, and recognize how poorly we have cared for it. As Aschbacher put it: “That would create a very different life on planet Earth.”

  • Back to Earth: What happens to the Artemis II astronauts now?

    Back to Earth: What happens to the Artemis II astronauts now?

    After a groundbreaking journey that pushed the boundaries of human space exploration, the four-member Artemis II crew has completed their mission and splashed down safely off the coast of California, re-entering Earth’s atmosphere at a blistering speed of 25,000 miles per hour (40,000 kilometers per hour). This mission marks a historic milestone: the crew traveled farther into deep space than any human group before, surpassing the 1970 Apollo 13 record of 248,655 miles by more than 4,000 additional miles.

    During their lunar fly-by, the crew carried out a rare, unforgettable observation: using specialized eclipse viewers to watch a solar eclipse from their unique vantage point in space, capturing stunning images of the Moon backlit by the Sun from NASA’s Orion spacecraft. Even before their landing, the crew connected with audiences back on Earth, holding conversations with reporters, their families, and former U.S. President Donald Trump while still in orbit.

    For astronauts, space travel remains the defining peak of their professional lives, despite the unique hardships that come with extended time off-planet. Mission specialist Christina Koch noted ahead of splashdown that even minor inconveniences – from freeze-dried meals to limited private facilities for hygiene – were a small price to pay for the opportunity to explore deep space. The four crew members, commander Reid Wiseman, mission specialists Christina Koch and Victor Glover, and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen, now begin their transition back to life on Earth, following a standard post-mission protocol.

    Immediately after splashdown, the crew was retrieved by a waiting U.S. warship, where medical teams conducted urgent initial health assessments. They were then airlifted by helicopter to shore, before transferring to NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston for further evaluation. Extended time in microgravity inevitably causes physiological changes: without Earth’s gravitational pull, muscle and bone mass deteriorate, particularly in the postural muscles of the back, neck, and calves. Even with the crew’s rigorous in-orbit exercise routine, some muscle loss is unavoidable, with up to 20% mass loss possible over just two weeks. However, NASA experts note the Artemis II mission’s relatively short duration means long-term health impacts are expected to be minimal. Compared to the five to six month typical stays on the International Space Station, the Artemis II crew’s time in space aligns with the short two to three week missions of the 1981-2011 space shuttle era, putting them at far lower risk of severe physiological degradation.

    Psychologically, returning to Earth brings a mix of emotions for the crew, all seasoned, highly trained space explorers selected for their emotional stability. Koch already shared from orbit that she will deeply miss the close teamwork and shared sense of purpose that defines life on a deep space mission. Like many astronauts before them, the Artemis II crew gained a profound new perspective on Earth from space: seeing the planet hanging in the black void of space reinforced how interconnected all humanity is, and how fragile our shared home is. “It truly emphasized how alike we are, how the same thing keeps every single person on planet Earth alive,” Koch explained. While many astronauts report being reluctant to leave the excitement and purpose of space work, the crew expressed immense excitement to reunite with their loved ones after the high-risk mission.

    For Wiseman, who lost his wife to cancer in 2020 and has raised their two teenage daughters as a single father, the reunion holds particular weight: he had prepared his daughters for the worst-case scenario before launch, showing them where his will was kept in case of a fatal accident. For Hansen’s family, the anticipation has been building for months. “Our two daughters and son were so, so excited to see their dad living his dream,” Dr. Catherine Hansen, Jeremy Hansen’s wife, told BBC World Service’s Newsday. “When Jeremy is back safely, we will absolutely come together. First just the five of us in a quiet environment to hear some of those private stories, and then we will absolutely celebrate with the world.”

    Looking ahead, the Artemis II crew’s futures remain tied to NASA’s ambitious lunar exploration program. While NASA does not disclose private details of crew members’ post-mission plans, the three NASA-affiliated astronauts remain active members of the agency’s astronaut corps, and all four Artemis II crew members are eligible to fly on future Artemis missions. The program is already gearing up for Artemis III, currently scheduled for 2027, and Artemis IV in 2028 – with Artemis III marked as the mission that will return human boots to the lunar surface for the first time since Apollo 17 in 1972, though industry analysts widely expect the landing date to be pushed back.

    One confirmed upcoming engagement is a visit to the White House: former President Trump, who first established the Artemis program during his first term in 2017, called the crew while they were in space to extend an invitation for a formal reception in the Oval Office. “I’ll ask for your autograph, because I don’t really ask for autographs much, but you deserve that,” Trump told the crew, adding that he planned to give them “a big salute on behalf of the American people and beyond that.” It remains unclear whether Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen will join the Washington visit.

    The biggest change the crew can expect after their mission is a sharp rise in public profile. Unlike many recent astronaut crews, the Artemis II four have captured global public attention, with round-the-clock news coverage and viral social media content turning them into household names. Adjusting to this new level of fame will likely be one of the biggest transitions they face as they settle back into life on Earth.

  • Final push for votes as challenger to Hungary’s Orbán scents victory

    Final push for votes as challenger to Hungary’s Orbán scents victory

    On the eve of Hungary’s most consequential national election in a generation, the country’s two leading political forces are pushing their campaigns to the final 24-hour stretch, as challenger Péter Magyar mounts a historic bid to unseat Viktor Orbán’s ruling Fidesz party, which has held uninterrupted power for 16 years.

    Addressing thousands of energized supporters ahead of voting, Magyar declared his movement was on the cusp of securing a two-thirds parliamentary majority, urging his base to put in a final push before heading into the voting booths. Following his speech, the opposition leader worked the crowd, posing for selfies with voters in a display of grassroots connection that has become a hallmark of his campaign. His final campaign stop will be in Debrecen, Hungary’s second-largest city located in the country’s northeast, while Orbán—who trails Magyar in most independent opinion polls—will close out his campaign with a major rally in the capital, Budapest.

    The momentum of the anti-Fidesz movement was on full display Friday night, when tens of thousands of Hungarians packed Budapest’s Heroes’ Square and the adjacent streets for a united anti-incumbent concert, one of the largest public opposition gatherings in the country in decades. For first-time voter Fanni, who traveled two hours from her southern village to attend the event with her mother, the election represents a once-in-a-generation opening for change. “I don’t think I’d support Magyar in an ideal world, but this is our only shot to turn things around,” she said, adding that she could feel a palpable shift across the country.

    Orbán’s greatest vulnerability heading into the vote is the broad, cross-sectional public anger that has coalesced around Magyar’s opposition movement. A former Fidesz insider who broke with the party over its corruption and authoritarian turn, Magyar has built his new grassroots political party, Tisza, into a unifying force for disparate anti-Orbán groups across the political spectrum.

    The incumbent prime minister has received high-profile backing from prominent American conservative figures in the final days of the campaign: U.S. Vice President JD Vance completed a two-day campaign swing in support of Fidesz, and former President Donald Trump pledged late Friday that he would leverage “the full economic might of the United States to strengthen Hungary’s economy” if Orbán secures another term.

    Though Hungary is a small landlocked Central European nation with just 9.6 million residents, Orbán has positioned himself as a pivotal global player over his tenure. A close ally of both Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, he has emerged as a leading disruptive force within the European Union, consistently blocking Brussels’ policy initiatives on Ukraine and alienating his EU allies while maintaining close economic and political ties to the Kremlin.

    While pro-Fidesz pollsters still argue the incumbent holds a narrow edge—pointing to the large share of undecided “shy Fidesz voters” who do not share their voting intentions with pollsters—Orbán’s campaign has lacked the energy and momentum that has defined Magyar’s challenge. Orbán’s core message to voters has been a warning that the opposition could eliminate all the economic and political progress his government has built over 16 years, and he has called for national unity amid global uncertainty. His strategy of framing the EU and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as the primary threats to Hungarian sovereignty has failed to close the gap: most independent polls show Magyar holding a steady 10-point lead over Fidesz.

    Magyar, a centre-right conservative who spent years in senior roles within Fidesz before breaking away, has run a grueling national campaign, delivering as many as seven public speeches a day across villages, towns and cities across the country. Speaking to supporters in the small northwestern town of Mosonmagyaróvár, he framed the election as a historic opportunity for regime change to reverse Orbán’s authoritarian turn.

    Tisza’s coalition has drawn support from across the ideological spectrum, but its greatest strength is among young Hungarians, many of whom have never known any government other than Fidesz. “Right now, there’s no future for young people in this country,” said Laura, a first-time voter who attended a Magyar rally with her friend Napsugár.

    Political analyst Zsuzsanna Végh, a researcher with the German Marshall Fund of the United States, confirmed that a clear generational shift is underway: opinion polls put Fidesz’s support among voters aged 18 to 29 at less than 10 percent. She also noted that the opposition has made significant inroads in small towns and even rural villages, long considered Fidesz strongholds. “While large rally crowds don’t guarantee election outcomes, the scale of engagement and mobilization that Magyar has achieved is unprecedented in Hungary,” Végh said.

    A Magyar victory would end 16 years of Orbán rule and roll back many of the incumbent’s controversial policies, but to dismantle the pro-Fidesz institutional infrastructure that has been built in the judiciary and state bodies over the past 16 years, Magyar needs to win a two-thirds parliamentary majority. That will require flipping control of many long-held Fidesz municipal seats, including in Székesfehérvár, Hungary’s medieval “city of kings” located an hour south of Budapest. Orbán visited the city on Friday, reminding supporters that it has long been a safe Fidesz seat; losing the city would be a major humiliation for the party.

    One local stallholder in Székesfehérvár’s covered market estimated that 90 percent of local residents still back Fidesz. For Agota, a retired pensioner, the opposition’s pro-EU and pro-Ukraine stance poses a clear risk to Hungary. “I’m genuinely afraid they will drag Hungary into the war,” she said.

    Anti-EU and anti-Ukraine rhetoric has been the centerpiece of Orbán’s campaign, repeated nonstop on pro-Fidesz television networks and news websites, and featured on campaign posters that pair Zelensky and Magyar under the slogan “They are dangerous!”

    But György Wáberer, one of Hungary’s wealthiest businessmen, has accused Fidesz of deliberate fear-mongering over the EU and Ukraine to distract from its corruption and close alignment with the Kremlin. “April 12 is a fateful date: you will decide whether Hungary belongs to Europe or to Russia,” Wáberer said, drawing a fierce rebuke from a senior Orbán administration official who labeled Wáberer a traitor who sold out his country.

    Notably, Magyar has allowed Russian state propaganda television crews to cover his rallies, telling them they are witnessing authentic regime change in action, while his supporters have repeatedly chanted “Russians go home” — a clear reflection of growing public frustration with Orbán’s close ties to Putin. The same chant has even broken out at Orbán rallies, where protesters have disrupted the prime minister’s speeches.

    Orbán’s alignment with Putin has delivered cheap Russian fuel to Hungarian consumers throughout the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, but the chant “Russians go home” carries deep historical resonance in Hungary, dating back to the 1956 revolution against Soviet occupation.

    Even in loyal Fidesz territory like Székesfehérvár, opinions are deeply divided. At a local flower stall, 73-year-old Eva said she believes it is long past time for a change, while her daughter-in-law Andrea argues that Magyar is arrogant and dismissive of the progress Fidesz has delivered. “Fidesz has to go, they have stolen so much and the country is dying,” Eva said. Andrea pushed back, noting that Fidesz has renovated six local schools and built new hospital facilities in the city. Eva countered that much of the public funding for those projects was siphoned off by corrupt insiders close to Orbán.

    Widespread allegations of corruption and cronyism have pushed millions of former Fidesz voters away from the ruling party at both the local and national level. Over 16 years in power, big public infrastructure contracts have consistently been awarded to members of Orbán’s inner circle, while independent media outlets have been systematically bought up by allies of the prime minister. After nearly two decades in uninterrupted control, Fidesz may finally be facing its moment of reckoning at the ballot box.

  • Streep and Hathaway in Shanghai to promote sequel

    Streep and Hathaway in Shanghai to promote sequel

    Two decades after the cultural phenomenon that was *The Devil Wears Prada* first hit cinemas, Hollywood icons Meryl Streep and Anne Hathaway have made a much-anticipated appearance in Shanghai to drum up excitement for their upcoming sequel, holding a star-studded promotional gala at Taikoo Li Qiantan on Friday.

    The red carpet event marked a landmark reunion for the beloved on-screen duo, who drew cheers from hundreds of waiting fans with their fashion-forward looks that highlighted emerging Chinese creative talent. Hathaway stepped out in an elegant layered gown crafted by Chinese designer Susan Wang, while 76-year-old Streep paired her tailored blue Saint Laurent ensemble with a delicate floral brooch from renowned Chinese jewelry artist Cindy Chao.

    For Hathaway, the warm reception from Chinese fans moved her to tears as she took the stage. The actress, who first won over global audiences more than two decades ago in *The Princess Diaries*, greeted the crowd in Mandarin and opened up about the long-standing support she has received from Chinese moviegoers throughout her career. “China and Chinese fans have given me so much support. You have embraced me. You have supported my films … I just want to say how much it means to me, to be here sharing tonight with you,” she told the assembled audience.

    Earlier that same day, during an exclusive roundtable interview at Shanghai’s Peninsula Hotel, Streep opened up about what it meant to return to one of her most iconic roles: the sharp, intimidating fashion magazine editor Miranda Priestly, a character loosely inspired by *Vogue* editor-in-chief Anna Wintour.

    The Oscar-winning actress admitted that even in her most imaginative moments, she never expected to step back into Miranda’s shoes two decades after the original film’s release. “I never in my wildest dreams imagined that we would do a sequel 20 years later at this age,” she told China Daily. Streep added that she particularly appreciated the creative choice to align the character’s age with her own. “I like that Miranda is 76 years old. I like that very much, because I am 76 and I like to see that woman on the screen,” she explained.

    Streep also shared an unexpected update on her off-screen relationship with the real-life inspiration for her character: the pair have grown from casual acquaintances to close friends over the past 20 years, and even recently collaborated on a *Vogue* cover shoot together.

    The 2006 original *The Devil Wears Prada*, adapted from Lauren Weisberger’s bestselling 2003 novel, was a massive global box office success that earned two Academy Award nominations and remains a cultural touchstone for fashion and film fans around the world. The upcoming sequel recontextualizes the franchise for a dramatically changed media landscape, exploring fresh themes of fashion, industry power dynamics, and personal autonomy in the modern digital age.

    In a notable release schedule shift, *The Devil Wears Prada 2* will hold its global premiere in China on April 30, two weeks ahead of its North American theatrical launch. The film will be available to audiences across China in multiple premium formats including 2D, CINITY, IMAX, Dolby Cinema, and China Giant Screen.

  • Big change exposes past sexual misconduct among medics

    Big change exposes past sexual misconduct among medics

    A landmark change to Australian health regulation law has pulled back the curtain on more than 100 historical sexual misconduct findings against registered health practitioners across the country, marking a major shift toward greater transparency for patient safety.

    Before the new national law reform took effect, public access to professional disciplinary records was heavily restricted. Members of the public could only view active disciplinary sanctions against medical workers, meaning any completed or expired disciplinary action for sexual misconduct was hidden from view, leaving patients unaware of past violations by practitioners they might see for care. Under the updated rules, any proven finding of sexual misconduct against a registered health worker will remain permanently listed on the practitioner’s public record, eliminating the secrecy around historical offenses.

    This week, an initial record review completed by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) identified 107 practitioners with past sexual misconduct findings that have now been added to the public searchable register. Breakdowns by region show New South Wales has the highest number of newly disclosed cases at 35. Of the 107 practitioners whose records have been updated, 21 are still actively practicing in Australia, while the remaining 86 hold cancelled or lapsed registrations.

    The disclosure of these first 107 cases is only the first step in a broader retrospective review. AHPRA confirmed it is currently processing roughly 5,000 additional historical records to identify and publish other unreported sexual misconduct findings. The new transparency rules apply to every health profession regulated by the agency, covering not just doctors, but also nurses, dentists, psychologists, pharmacists, physiotherapists, and other registered health care workers.

    In a statement on the reform, AHPRA Chief Executive Justin Untersteiner emphasized that the new policy puts decision-making power directly in the hands of patients, allowing them to make fully informed choices about their own health care. “Sexual misconduct by registered health practitioners is an unacceptable breach of trust that undermines public health and safety,” Untersteiner said. He noted that the patient-practitioner relationship is uniquely built on trust, as patients often seek care when they are at their most vulnerable. A breach of that trust does not just harm the individual patient, he explained – it causes lasting damage to the entire health care system.

    Untersteiner added that sexual misconduct violations leave permanent, deep harm for survivors. To support patients who wish to report concerning behavior by a practitioner, AHPRA has assigned dedicated staff and specific resources to handle concerns, and he encouraged anyone with information to come forward.

  • US immigration appeals board decides Mahmoud Khalil can be deported

    US immigration appeals board decides Mahmoud Khalil can be deported

    A decades-long legal permanent resident of the United States and prominent Palestinian rights activist has moved one step closer to forced removal from the country, after the federal Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued a final deportation order in his case Thursday. The outcome has reignited fierce debate over the erosion of free speech protections and the politicization of U.S. immigration institutions under the second Trump administration.

    Unlike the independent federal judiciary that oversees most U.S. legal proceedings, the BIA operates as an entity under the executive branch, falling directly within the oversight of the Department of Justice alongside the nation’s entire immigration court system. This structural dependency has long drawn criticism from civil liberties advocates, who argue it leaves immigration rulings vulnerable to political pressure from the sitting White House.

    Khalil’s legal team, which includes counsel from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), has unequivocally framed the BIA’s final order as unlawful retaliation for the activist’s peaceful, public advocacy for Palestinian human rights. In response to Thursday’s ruling, attorneys confirmed they will pursue further appeal to challenge the decision.

    A separate federal civil case remains ongoing, in which Khalil alleges U.S. authorities violated his constitutional rights by targeting his activism. A critical court order from this ongoing litigation currently blocks Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from arresting Khalil or carrying out his deportation until the civil case reaches a conclusion.

    “The only thing standing between the government and its unconstitutional goals is the intervention of a federal district court last summer,” explained Brett Max Kaufman, an ACLU attorney working on Khalil’s defense. “Without the protection of a habeas court, the government could target anyone for this kind of retaliation. That makes today’s ruling a stark reminder of what is at stake in Mahmoud’s case. We will continue to use every available legal avenue to protect our client and defend First Amendment protections against this cruel, unrelenting campaign.”

    Habeas corpus, the legal principle at the center of the case, traces its origins to 13th-century England, where it was established to prevent the monarchy from detaining people arbitrarily without due process. Today, the protection applies to all people present on U.S. territory, regardless of whether they hold U.S. citizenship.

    Now 31, Khalil holds U.S. legal permanent resident status, a designation granted to Green Card holders that carries most of the same rights and obligations as citizenship short of voting. Back in June 2024, a federal court ordered Khalil’s release from ICE detention, with Judge Michael Farbiarz noting there was credible evidence that immigration charges had been brought specifically to punish Khalil for his speech — a finding that would violate constitutional protections.

    But the case has shifted steadily against the activist this year. In January 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that Judge Farbiarz lacked legal jurisdiction to intervene in the deportation proceedings. That ruling cleared the way for potential re-arrest of Khalil, handing a major victory to the Trump administration in a high-profile case that tests the boundaries of free speech for non-citizen activists, including international students and legal permanent residents.

    Khalil has rejected the BIA’s ruling and said the outcome came as no surprise. “I have committed no crime. I have broken no law. The only thing I am guilty of is speaking out against the genocide in Palestine — and this administration has weaponized the immigration system to punish me for it,” Khalil said in a public statement. “My family is here. My life is here. I reject any attempt to intimidate me out of my home based on lies and ideological attacks. This is not justice. This is just another attempt to retaliate against me.”

    Khalil rose to prominence as a lead negotiator for pro-Palestinian student demonstrators during the 2024 Gaza solidarity encampment at Columbia University, where he was a graduate student. The campus protest was organized to oppose Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, which the Gaza health ministry reports has killed more than 72,000 Palestinians as of 2025.

    The Trump administration, which has repeatedly framed pro-Palestinian campus activism as equivalent to antisemitism, launched a targeted crackdown on student organizers earlier this year. ICE plainclothes agents arrested Khalil outside his Columbia University campus apartment in March 2025. Agents initially claimed they had revoked Khalil’s student visa, but when Khalil’s wife presented agents with his Green Card proving permanent resident status, agents stated that status had also been revoked.

    Without notifying Khalil’s legal team or his family, authorities transferred Khalil to an immigration detention center in central Louisiana, even though his habeas case was pending in New York and he had previously been held in detention in nearby New Jersey. Khalil was one of the first high-profile activists affiliated with an elite U.S. university to be detained as part of the administration’s crackdown.

    He ultimately spent 104 days in ICE custody, forcing him to miss two milestone life events: the birth of his first child and his own graduation ceremony from Columbia University.