UK lawmaker says she is suing Elon Musk’s company over fake Grok bikini images

LONDON — A landmark legal challenge targeting artificial intelligence accountability has emerged in the United Kingdom, as a sitting Labour Party legislator has launched a privacy invasion lawsuit against Elon Musk’s AI development firm xAI over deepfake explicit images generated without her consent by the company’s Grok chatbot.

Jess Asato, who serves in the UK parliament for the governing party, revealed Thursday that the unauthorized deepfake content was produced in January, shortly after she publicly spoke out against the growing proliferation of non-consensual deepfake pornography across digital platforms. According to Asato’s account, an anonymous party leveraged Grok’s image generation capabilities to create fake photos of her wearing a bikini that were never shot or authorized by her.

The formal legal claim was submitted to London’s High Court this week, with Asato arguing that xAI violated the UK Data Protection Act through the misuse of her private personal information. Beyond seeking monetary damages for the harm she has endured, the lawmaker has a larger strategic goal: to establish a binding legal precedent that holds AI developers legally responsible for dangerous design flaws in their systems that enable harmful misuse.

In a statement explaining her decision to pursue legal action, Asato drew a parallel between the online violation and a physical offense. “Nobody would be able to walk up to me in the street and strip me and put me in a bikini, and I don’t see why anybody should be able to do that to me online, because the feeling, while it is not quite the same, is very similar,” she said. “It is like somebody has digitally stripped me without my consent.”

Asato also said she encourages other people who have suffered similar harm from AI-generated non-consensual deepfakes to join her legal action, framing the case as a broader fight for digital privacy safety.

This lawsuit comes amid a growing global backlash against the spread of non-consensual deepfake pornography, which has triggered widespread calls for tighter regulation of AI tools. Back in January, after the incident involving Asato drew public attention and international outcry, xAI announced it would update Grok’s policies to ban users from editing images of real people to remove clothing.

The UK passed a national law last year that explicitly criminalizes the creation or solicitation of non-consensual deepfake images of adults, but Asato argues that existing accountability frameworks are incomplete. Even after companies patch dangerous flaws in their AI systems, she notes, irreversible harm has already been done to victims of misuse.

“Once the damage is done, the damage is done,” Asato said. “If you think about any other products, like a car, for example, that might have been manufactured with a fault, it doesn’t matter if, you know, the cars get recalled and the faults are fixed and no more harm is done.” Companies must still be held responsible for the harm their flawed products caused before the fix, she argues.

As of Thursday, xAI had not issued any immediate public response to requests for comment on the new lawsuit.