US Supreme Court allows Texas to use redrawn voting maps in midterms

The U.S. Supreme Court has authorized Texas to implement a controversial congressional redistricting map that could significantly bolster Republican representation in the 2026 midterm elections. The unsigned ruling, issued Thursday, grants the state’s emergency request to suspend a lower court decision that had blocked the map over allegations of racial gerrymandering.

In what appears to be a 6-3 decision along ideological lines, the Court’s conservative majority concluded that Texas met the requirements for emergency judicial relief. The majority opinion stated that the lower court had “committed at least two serious errors” in its preliminary assessment of the case. The three liberal justices filed dissenting opinions opposing the decision.

The legal battle stems from redistricting legislation passed by Texas’s Republican-controlled legislature and signed by Governor Greg Abbott in August. In November, a federal district court found substantial evidence that the new voting districts constituted unconstitutional racial gerrymandering and ordered the state to revert to previous congressional boundaries.

The redistricting conflict escalated dramatically when Democratic state lawmakers staged a walkout during the summer to prevent voting on the proposed map. This political maneuver sparked similar redistricting efforts in other states, including California, where voters approved new congressional maps in a November special election specifically designed to counterbalance Texas’s potential gains.

The Supreme Court’s intervention represents a significant development in the ongoing national battle over electoral maps, with potentially far-reaching consequences for partisan control of Congress.