In a surprising diplomatic development, former U.S. President Donald Trump has declared the establishment of a “framework of a future deal” concerning Greenland during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The announcement came through his Truth Social platform on Wednesday, following discussions with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.
This declaration follows weeks of heightened tensions after Trump threatened economic sanctions against eight close U.S. allies who opposed his controversial plans to acquire the semi-autonomous Danish territory. While Trump characterized the meeting with Rutte as “very productive,” the NATO leader clarified that Danish sovereignty over Greenland was not discussed during their conversation.
Both Danish and Greenlandic authorities have responded with firm statements reaffirming that sovereignty remains non-negotiable. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen emphasized that while Denmark remains open to discussions on “security, investments, economy,” the nation’s sovereignty is not subject to negotiation. This position was echoed by Aaja Chenmitz, one of Greenland’s two representatives in the Danish parliament, who asserted that “Nothing about us without us” regarding any negotiations affecting Greenland.
The diplomatic standoff appears to center on reports suggesting the potential transfer of sovereignty over specific areas of Greenland for U.S. military bases, similar to Britain’s sovereign base areas in Cyprus. U.K. Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper expressed hope for trilateral discussions involving Denmark, Greenland, and the United States while emphasizing that Greenland’s sovereignty must be protected.
Strategic concerns driving U.S. interest include countering perceived threats from Chinese and Russian activities in the Arctic region and securing access to Greenland’s vast reserves of rare earth minerals, crucial for modern technologies. NATO allies have proposed alternative security arrangements, including an “Arctic Sentry” initiative modeled after the Baltic Sea surveillance mission, to address U.S. security concerns without compromising sovereignty.
The existing 1951 defense agreement between the U.S. and Denmark already permits unlimited U.S. military personnel in Greenland, with over 100 permanently stationed at the Pituffik base. Potential negotiations may focus on modernizing this agreement rather than transferring sovereignty, despite Trump’s previous insistence that “Countries have to have ownership and you defend ownership, you don’t defend leases.”
This development represents the latest chapter in Trump’s longstanding interest in acquiring Greenland, continuing a tradition of U.S. presidential interest in the strategically vital Arctic territory that dates back decades.
