In a recent development, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth disclosed that three individuals were killed in a US military strike targeting an alleged drug-smuggling vessel in the Caribbean. The incident, which occurred on Saturday, is part of a broader campaign initiated by the Trump administration to combat drug trafficking into the United States. Since September, these strikes have sparked significant controversy, with experts questioning their legality under international law and Latin American leaders condemning the actions as violations of human rights.
Hegseth claimed the targeted boat was operated by a designated terrorist organization and was navigating international waters along a known drug-smuggling route. However, he provided no concrete evidence to substantiate these allegations. The announcement was accompanied by a video purportedly showing the vessel being struck, though the footage was grainy and lacked clarity.
The Trump administration has defended the strikes as necessary measures against ‘narco-terrorists,’ particularly those linked to Venezuela. Critics, however, argue that the operations are politically motivated, aimed at exerting pressure on governments in the region, such as those of Colombia and Venezuela, which have been at odds with US policies. Colombian President Gustavo Petro has labeled the attacks as ‘murder,’ while Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro accused the US of fabricating a war.
The US has intensified its military presence in the Caribbean, deploying warships, fighter jets, and drones, ostensibly to curb drug trafficking. However, military analysts suggest the scale of the deployment exceeds what is necessary for such operations. The UN’s human rights chief, Volker Turk, has condemned the strikes, stating they violate international human rights law and result in an unacceptable loss of life.
Domestically, the legality of the strikes has also been questioned, with some US lawmakers arguing that congressional approval is required. Despite these concerns, the Trump administration has maintained its stance, threatening further military action in the region.