标签： North America

In a significant move to combat organized crime and corruption, the United States has imposed sanctions on the El Mayo faction of the Sinaloa Cartel, one of Mexico’s most notorious drug trafficking organizations, along with several of its alleged associates, including a sitting federal lawmaker. The announcement was made by the U.S. Treasury Department on Thursday, September 18, 2023, as part of an intensified effort to pressure Mexican crime groups and their political allies. The El Mayo faction is accused of producing and trafficking fentanyl, a deadly synthetic opioid, as well as other illicit drugs such as cocaine, marijuana, heroin, and methamphetamine. Among the sanctioned individuals is Hilda Araceli Brown Figueredo, a federal lawmaker representing Baja California for the ruling Morena party and former mayor of Rosarito. The U.S. Treasury alleges that Brown maintained close ties with a cartel operative, enabling the El Mayo faction to exert control over parts of Rosarito’s municipal government and shield its criminal activities. Brown has publicly denied the allegations, stating her commitment to continue her work. The sanctions also target five individuals and 15 companies linked to the cartel. This action coincides with a visit by John K. Hurley, the U.S. Treasury’s under secretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, to Mexico City for discussions with Mexican officials. The Biden administration has continued the Trump-era policy of designating Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations and pressing Mexico to investigate and prosecute corrupt politicians with cartel ties.

The U.S. media landscape is undergoing a seismic shift, marked by heightened tensions between the Trump administration and major broadcast networks. The indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel’s long-running ABC show has become the latest flashpoint in this ongoing conflict. Kimmel, a staple of late-night comedy, faced backlash after making controversial remarks following the murder of Charlie Kirk, which appeared to mock President Trump and his supporters. This incident has reignited debates over media bias and government interference in editorial content. The Trump administration, led by Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr, has been actively scrutinizing media companies, accusing them of liberal bias and threatening regulatory action. Carr, described by Trump as a ‘warrior for free speech,’ has expanded the FCC’s purview to include tech giants like Apple and Google, alleging they participate in a ‘censorship cartel.’ The administration’s aggressive stance has prompted some media companies to settle lawsuits and revise editorial policies, while others, like The New York Times, have vowed to resist intimidation. Critics, including some conservatives, warn that these actions could endanger free speech. Meanwhile, media consolidation and the conservative leanings of certain owners have made the industry more susceptible to government pressure. Despite these challenges, some outlets remain defiant, asserting their commitment to independent journalism.

In a significant development within the conservative political landscape, Erika Kirk, the widow of slain activist Charlie Kirk, has been unanimously elected as the new CEO of Turning Point USA. The announcement came on September 18, 2025, just days after her husband was fatally shot during an event at Utah Valley University. The organization, founded by Charlie Kirk to mobilize young voters for Republican causes, now faces a critical juncture in its mission. Vice President JD Vance and his wife Usha were present as Air Force Two transported Charlie Kirk’s body to Phoenix, Arizona, on September 11, 2025. The accused shooter, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, allegedly fired the fatal shot from a rooftop during the campus event. Erika Kirk, 36, has vowed to continue her husband’s legacy, emphasizing her Christian faith and conservative values. In a poignant video address, she declared, ‘The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry.’ The board of Turning Point USA expressed confidence in her leadership, stating that Charlie Kirk had prepared the organization to endure even the greatest challenges.

In an unprecedented move, former President Donald Trump’s administration has sought the U.S. Supreme Court’s approval to dismiss Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, a decision that threatens the long-standing independence of the central bank. The legal battle, initiated on September 18, marks the first time a sitting president has attempted to remove a Fed official since its establishment in 1913. The Justice Department filed a request to overturn a September 9 ruling by U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, which temporarily blocked Trump from firing Cook. Cobb determined that Trump’s allegations of mortgage fraud against Cook, which she denies, were insufficient grounds for removal under the Federal Reserve Act. Cook, appointed by President Joe Biden, participated in the Fed’s recent decision to cut interest rates by a quarter percentage point, a move aimed at addressing job market concerns. The legal dispute raises significant questions about the Fed’s autonomy in setting monetary policy, a cornerstone of its operational independence. Trump’s administration has argued that the president has ‘unreviewable discretion’ to remove Fed governors ‘for cause,’ though the law does not define what constitutes such cause. Cook, the first Black woman to serve as a Fed governor, has countered that Trump’s actions are politically motivated, stemming from her monetary policy stance. The case has broader implications for the global economy, as concerns over the Fed’s independence could undermine confidence in its ability to manage inflation and stabilize financial markets. The Supreme Court, with a 6-3 conservative majority, has previously sided with Trump in similar cases, but its stance on the Fed’s unique structure remains uncertain. The outcome of this legal battle could set a precedent for presidential authority over independent federal agencies.

In a significant legal development, a federal appeals court has upheld protections for Venezuelan immigrants residing in the United States, despite efforts by the Trump administration to revoke their Temporary Protected Status (TPS). The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco, declined to halt a lower court’s ruling that deemed the administration’s attempt to end TPS for 600,000 Venezuelans unlawful. The three-judge panel emphasized that terminating TPS would expose these individuals to wrongful deportation, family separation, and job loss, outcomes Congress never intended. The Department of Justice has indicated plans to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which previously sided with the administration in a related case. The TPS program, established in 1991, offers temporary work authorization and deportation relief to migrants from countries facing crises such as natural disasters or armed conflict. The Biden administration had extended TPS to Venezuelans and Haitians, but Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem reversed these extensions in February 2025, claiming they were no longer justified. The recent ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by affected migrants and the National TPS Alliance, challenging Noem’s actions. While the decision primarily impacts Venezuelans, it also indirectly supports Haitian immigrants, whose TPS status was similarly revoked. The legal battle highlights the ongoing tension between immigration policies and humanitarian protections in the U.S.

A federal judge has issued a significant ruling against the Trump administration’s efforts to deport unaccompanied Guatemalan migrant children with active immigration cases. Judge Timothy Kelly, appointed by President Trump and based in Washington, D.C., upheld a previous judicial block on the policy, strongly criticizing the administration’s unsubstantiated claim that the children’s parents desired their deportation. The ruling came in response to a legal challenge sparked by the administration’s surprise attempt to deport 76 Guatemalan minors in U.S. custody on August 31. Initially, Justice Department lawyer Drew Ensign asserted that the children’s parents had requested their return, but this claim was later retracted. The reversal followed a Reuters report citing an internal Guatemalan attorney general document, which revealed that most parents of the approximately 600 Guatemalan children in U.S. custody could not be reached, and many of those contacted opposed their children’s return. In a 43-page opinion, Judge Kelly described the administration’s justification as ‘crumbling like a house of cards’ and emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the parents’ alleged wishes. The judge’s decision prevents the rapid deportation of these children while their cases remain active. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice have yet to comment on the ruling. Under federal law, unaccompanied migrant children are placed in government-run shelters until they can be reunited with family or placed in foster care. A Guatemalan mother, who spoke anonymously, expressed her son’s desire to remain in California despite her longing for his return. She works long hours at a restaurant, earning just enough to cover basic necessities.

In a recent development, former U.S. President Donald Trump has urged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to consider revoking the licenses of television networks that provide predominantly negative coverage of him. This statement came amidst the controversy surrounding the suspension of ABC host Jimmy Kimmel, who was taken off air indefinitely following his remarks about the murder of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. Kimmel had suggested that the suspect was a Maga Republican, despite authorities stating the alleged gunman was influenced by leftist ideology. Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, criticized the media’s portrayal of him, claiming that 97% of network coverage was negative, yet he won the election decisively. He questioned why such networks should retain their broadcasting licenses. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr supported the suspension of Kimmel, emphasizing the need for broadcasters to adhere to public interest standards. However, legal experts argue that the First Amendment protects free speech, making it unlikely for the FCC to revoke licenses based on political disagreements. The incident has sparked a broader debate on cancel culture and free speech, with prominent figures like former President Barack Obama condemning the suspension as a dangerous escalation of regulatory threats against media. Meanwhile, others, including media personalities like Piers Morgan and Greg Gutfeld, have criticized Kimmel’s comments as misleading and offensive. The controversy continues to unfold, raising questions about the balance between accountability and censorship in media.