标签: North America

北美洲

  • Trump gave $45,000 cash gifts to Natalie Harp and two other aides, public records show

    Trump gave $45,000 cash gifts to Natalie Harp and two other aides, public records show

    Newly released official financial disclosure documents from the Trump administration have thrown a spotlight on an unprecedented practice: sitting U.S. President Donald Trump has distributed six-figure cash gifts to four of his most trusted inner-circle White House staffers, a move that has sparked fresh debate over compliance with federal ethics rules.

    According to the disclosures, the total value of the gifts amounts to $157,000. Longtime loyal aide Natalie Harp and two other unnamed senior staff each received $45,000, while Walt Nauta, Trump’s long-serving aide and Director of Oval Office Operations, was given $22,000. Notably, none of the other 91 declared White House employees reported receiving any similar gifts from the president, a discrepancy that has yet to be explained by administration officials.

    All four gift recipients are widely recognized as members of Trump’s closest personal and political circle. Harp, a 35-year-old aide who has worked alongside Trump for years, is one of his most trusted confidantes, tasked with drafting his frequent posts on the Truth Social platform. She gained national media attention last month when it was revealed she was one of the handful of people who accompanied Trump during his unannounced plane swap while departing Turkey.

    Nauta, a U.S. Navy veteran, first served as Trump’s military valet during his first presidential term, and continued working as a personal assistant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate after he left office in 2021. In 2023, he was indicted alongside Trump on charges related to the mishandling of classified national security documents, though the case against him was ultimately dismissed. The two other recipients include Margo Martin, a communications advisor who documents Trump’s public and private activities for social media, and 26-year-old Chamberlain Harris, Trump’s executive assistant who was appointed to the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts earlier this year, where he oversees construction projects at the White House and other Trump-aligned initiatives in Washington D.C.

    The White House has defended the cash gifts, framing them as personal holiday presents unrelated to the recipients’ official government duties, and fully compliant with U.S. federal law. “The president has a longstanding practice of giving Christmas gifts to people in his orbit, including at times employees and aides, both in government and in his time in the private sector,” a senior White House official said in a statement to the BBC. “The gifts at issue here have nothing to do with any of these individuals’ official government duties, and are entirely permissible under relevant legal and ethical standards.”

    Under current federal regulations, government employees are barred from accepting outside compensation tied to their official work, but the administration argues these gifts fall under the exception for personal social gifts. However, ethics experts have raised questions about the credibility of this explanation. Cassandra Burke Robertson, a law professor and director of the Center for Professional Ethics at Case Western Reserve University, noted that the gift amounts align closely with pay scales for the staffers’ roles, rather than reflecting the arbitrary nature of personal friendship gifts.

    “If it were compensation, it’s not allowed. Of course, that’s where the administration’s argument comes in, that it’s a social gift done out of friendship. Not compensation…the question is then whether that is a credible explanation,” Robertson told the BBC. She added that the amounts “seem to be standard” based on each recipient’s employee level, which suggests that the size of the gift was tied to their employment position, not their personal relationship with the president.

    Robertson also pointed out that even if the gifts are technically legal, they add to growing public concern over perceived conflicts of interest within the Trump administration, coming on the heels of recent controversies tied to prediction markets and cryptocurrency dealings. “It does add to a generalised perception of really rampant conflicts of interest,” she said.

    Historically, there are no recorded instances of a sitting U.S. president giving large cash gifts to White House staff. While it is common for sitting presidents to give personal mementos and souvenirs to staffers, the practice has never involved large cash disbursements to a small group of inner-circle aides. For example, former President Barack Obama gave former press secretary Robert Gibbs a framed borrowed necktie as a personal gift ahead of the 2004 Democratic National Convention, a far cry from the five-figure cash gifts disclosed this week.

  • Mother demands answers, weeks after black woman found hanging from Mississippi tree

    Mother demands answers, weeks after black woman found hanging from Mississippi tree

    More than a month after 29-year-old Tasia Fortune’s body was discovered hanging from a tree on the property of an abandoned Jackson, Mississippi home, her grieving family and a restless local community are still pushing for transparent information from law enforcement and state officials.

    Fortune’s mother, Christy Spivey, who resides in Kentucky, told the BBC she is consumed by frustration over repeated delays and a lack of communication from investigating officers. Spivey last saw her daughter alive at a family reunion in late July, when Fortune mentioned she was considering moving back home to be closer to her family. When Spivey was finally called to identify her daughter’s remains at a funeral home ahead of burial, she was too devastated to look directly at the body, only glancing at it from the corner of her eye. She ultimately chose burial over cremation, holding out faint hope that new investigation findings could one day require an exhumation for further testing.

    For weeks after the 3 August discovery of Fortune’s body, police offered no public updates on the case, and Spivey says her repeated requests for information about the investigation’s progress went completely unanswered. That changed only this Tuesday, when Jackson Police Chief RaShall Brackney confirmed for the first time that the department has treated Fortune’s death as a potential homicide from the first day of the probe, as investigators wait for formal autopsy results from the state medical examiner’s office. Brackney explained to the BBC that labeling all pending death investigations as potential homicides is standard policy to preserve critical evidence before an official cause of death is confirmed; prior to Tuesday’s announcement, the department had only described the matter as a general death investigation. The medical examiner’s office has declined to comment on the active case.

    Anxiety over the case has spread rapidly across majority-Black Jackson, amplified by Mississippi’s long, brutal history of racial terror lynchings against Black Americans. Fortune’s death marks the third incident in less than a year where a body was found hanging from a tree in the state. In September 2025, two bodies — one a Black man, the other a white man — were discovered on the same day. Both were officially ruled suicides, but the mother of the Black victim, Trey Reed, continues to dispute that finding.

    The prolonged lack of clarity has fueled widespread distrust in local and state authorities. Two online petitions have gained tens of thousands of signatures: one calls for an independent investigation into the office of Mississippi’s chief medical examiner Dr. Staci Turner, who has overseen the recent string of cases involving Black decedents, while the other demands the FBI launch a federal probe into Fortune’s death. The BBC has requested comment from Dr. Turner but has not yet received a response.

    Local leaders have echoed the community’s calls for urgent action. Jackson City Councilman Kenneth Stokes told the BBC he has visited the neighborhood where Fortune reportedly lived multiple times and has never seen police officers conducting investigative work at the site. “All cases are important, but this one — a hanging in Mississippi — should rise to the top of the priority list,” Stokes said. He sent formal requests for assistance weeks ago to federal prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Mississippi and to the FBI, but has yet to receive any reply from either agency. “Nothing from nobody. It’s like nobody cares,” Stokes added. The BBC has also contacted both federal offices for comment with no response as of press time.

    U.S. Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett has formally requested federal intervention, sending a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice asking for a full investigation into the recent string of Mississippi deaths, including Fortune’s, labeling them potential “modern-day lynchings” and referencing the state’s well-documented history of anti-Black violent terrorism. The DOJ has not yet responded to requests for comment on the request. Notably, Mississippi is not alone: this year alone, four Black Americans have been found hanged from trees in North Carolina, three of which have been ruled suicides with an autopsy still pending for the fourth.

    While Stokes stresses he has not concluded whether Fortune’s death was a racially motivated lynching, he says the only thing that matters to him and the community is getting clear, accurate answers. For young Black residents including Brandon King, president of the Jackson State University student chapter of the NAACP, the uncertainty has created a pervasive climate of fear. “This is supposed to be the state capital. This is where I’m supposed to feel the most safe,” King told the BBC. “Right now, the feeling is that you could be next. This is in your own backyard.”

    For Spivey, the anger and grief remain raw. “What is the hold up?” she asked, echoing the question that has gone unanswered for more than a month for her family and thousands of others demanding accountability.

  • Listen: Juror in Lindsay Clancy trial speaks about lone holdout

    Listen: Juror in Lindsay Clancy trial speaks about lone holdout

    In a rare public comment following the high-profile proceedings in the Lindsay Clancy trial, one sitting juror has broken silence to shed new light on the closed-door deliberations that shaped the case’s outcome. The juror, who chose to speak on condition of anonymity to protect their privacy amid intense public scrutiny of the trial, opened up about the tense dynamics that unfolded inside the jury room during days of closed discussions.

    According to the juror’s account, the 12-member panel included a handful of what they described as “big personalities” – individuals who were unafraid to voice strong, unwavering opinions and push back heavily against perspectives that clashed with their own. Despite the charged atmosphere and strong convictions held by most jurors, the panel ultimately maintained enough respect for differing views to avoid rushing a decision. Most notably, the juror confirmed that one panel member stood alone as a holdout on the verdict, refusing to align with the majority position even as discussions stretched on.

    In a striking twist to the behind-the-scenes account, the speaking juror emphasized that the majority of the panel defended the lone holdout’s right to hold a dissenting opinion. Rather than pressuring the outlier to abandon their position or rush a compromise, jurors acknowledged the importance of allowing every panel member to weigh in fully and stand by their conclusions, even when that meant extended deliberations. The comments offer an unprecedented look into how jury dynamics function in high-emotion, publicized criminal cases, highlighting the tensions between majority consensus and individual conviction that are core to the U.S. jury trial system.

  • Anthropic researcher believes more than 10% chance AI ‘could kill all humans’

    Anthropic researcher believes more than 10% chance AI ‘could kill all humans’

    The global debate over artificial intelligence safety has entered a urgent new phase, as current and former researchers from leading AI developer Anthropic have issued stark warnings that rapid, unregulated progress could put the entire human species at risk within the next 10 years.

    Evan Hubinger, a leading AI alignment researcher at Anthropic — the company behind the popular chatbot and coding assistant Claude — shared his grim assessment in a viral post on X that has now been viewed over 10 million times. Hubinger clarified that current-generation AI models carry a low level of existential risk, but warned that the technology’s accelerating pace of self-improvement means there is a greater than 10% chance supercharged AI could kill all humans by the mid-2030s.

    While Hubinger did not outline a specific scenario for how AI could cause human extinction, his comments mark a deepening of the conversation around AI risk: the debate has shifted in recent months from whether advanced AI poses a genuine threat to humanity to just how severe that threat could become. Hubinger added that while Anthropic is making a good-faith effort to address safety concerns, the company currently has no actionable plan to solve the critical problem of AI alignment — the process of embedding human ethical values into AI systems to ensure they align with human priorities — and is not on a clear path to solving it ahead of the arrival of superintelligent AI.

    Hubinger’s post came in response to comments from Jacob Coxon, a former AI researcher who recently left Anthropic after previous stints at OpenAI. Coxon accused both of the leading AI firms of acting irresponsibly, noting that advanced AI systems will soon reach superhuman capability, allowing them to breach nearly any cyber defense, upend entire industries overnight, and accumulate significant real-world power and resources. OpenAI has been contacted for comment on the accusations, but has not yet issued a response.

    Wendy Hall, a prominent computer scientist who advises the United Nations on AI policy, told the BBC she was stunned by the social media posts from the two researchers. Hall suggested the warnings could be a calculated PR move as both Anthropic and OpenAI prepare for highly anticipated initial public offerings, but added that if the comments are genuine, investors should reconsider backing firms that acknowledge such severe risks without a clear mitigation plan. “Why would someone want to say that? I would plead with investors not to invest in this company if that is their value system,” she said.

    In a separate development that has raised further questions about AI safety collaboration, the Financial Times reported this week that Anthropic has declined to share its latest frontier AI model with the UK’s AI Safety Institute (AISI), one of the world’s leading global bodies tasked with assessing and mitigating AI risk. Anthropic has declined to comment on either its former and current employees’ social media posts or the report about withholding its model from the AISI. A UK Cabinet Office spokesperson did not directly confirm or deny that the model was withheld, instead stating that the UK government “continues to collaborate closely with industry partners, including Anthropic, to make models safer.”

    Warnings over AI safety have grown increasingly urgent across the industry in recent months, as new evidence emerges that leading firms are struggling to contain emerging risks from autonomous AI systems. Earlier this summer, multiple major AI developers — including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta — publicly disclosed incidents where their own autonomous AI agents successfully carried out cyber-attacks, a development that many alignment researchers see as proof that current safety efforts are falling short.

    In Anthropic’s own August safety report, the company assessed that the risk of its future highly capable models becoming misaligned and causing catastrophic, AI-initiated harm through automated weapons research and development was low, but it also noted that its confidence in that low-risk assessment has dropped compared to previous reports. The company wrote that it is already seeing “early signs of potential acceleration” in AI capability gains that are outpacing safety progress.

    Calls for urgent action to slow AI development and strengthen global oversight have grown in recent months from even the highest levels of the industry. In 2023, the CEOs of OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic jointly warned of the existential risk posed by unregulated advanced AI. More recently, OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki called for “extreme caution” around rapid AI progress, arguing that greater intervention is needed to ensure humans retain control of future technological development. Anthropic’s own top leaders, Dario Amodei and Jared Kaplan, have also backed calls to slow the pace of frontier AI development.

    Earlier this year, an open letter signed by more than 1,300 AI industry employees called on the U.S. government to support a global international effort to build the technical and governance frameworks needed to deliberately slow the pace of advanced autonomous AI development, to give safety researchers time to close the gap between capability gains and risk mitigation.

  • White House pulls Tetris-style ‘Build The Wall’ game after copyright concern

    White House pulls Tetris-style ‘Build The Wall’ game after copyright concern

    Weeks after the Tetris Company issued formal concerns over unauthorized use of the iconic game’s design and intellectual property, the White House has pulled a controversial Tetris-inspired political minigame titled “Build The Wall” from its official website.

    The now-removed game, which tasked players with stacking colored blocks to construct a barrier along the U.S. southern border, was one of five political arcade-style minigames hosted on a new section of the White House site. On September 4, the official Tetris Company account on the social platform X publicly distanced itself from the project, stating it had no involvement in the game’s development and that the organization takes copyright violations extremely seriously. The company added: “At Tetris we believe in the power of connection and building people together, not dividing them. To our fans everywhere: we love you, we see you, and we’re grateful to have you in the Tetris community.”

    To date, the White House has declined to respond to multiple requests for comment from media outlets including the BBC, and has not released an official explanation for the decision to take the game offline. This is not the first time the Tetris Company has enforced its intellectual property rights: in 2012, the firm reached an out-of-court settlement for an undisclosed sum with the creators of Mino, an iPhone game it accused of copying the core visual and mechanics of the original Tetris experience.

    Four other political minigames remain available on the White House website’s arcade section, each drawing their own criticism for their political messaging and borrowings from existing popular games. One title, “Flappy Bill,” is a direct clone of the 2013 viral hit Flappy Bird, reworked to task players with guiding a bald eagle through obstacles modeled after National Mall monuments. A second, Rio Run, adapts the classic mobile game Snake to frame gameplay as patrolling a river border; when a player collides with the map edge, a counter labeled “Deported” displays how many people the player “caught” during the round.

    The collection of games has already sparked pushback from political opponents. Connecticut Democratic State Senator Matt Lesser criticized the initiative in a public X post, writing: “Heating oil is near an all-time high but hey you can play Border Tsar Tom Homan in a video game,” highlighting what critics see as a misplaced priority ahead of critical domestic policy needs.

    This episode is far from an isolated incident: it marks the latest in a string of controversies stemming from the Trump administration’s ongoing effort to weave pop culture and video game references into its official political messaging on social media. In October 2025, the official White House X account faced widespread condemnation for sharing an AI-generated image of President Trump dressed in iconic armor from the blockbuster Halo video game franchise. Just months later, in March 2026, the account posted a viral video that blended footage of U.S. military strikes in Iran with popular film and game clips, including a line from Halo’s central character Master Chief: “finishing this fight.” Steve Downes, the voice actor behind Master Chief, publicly condemned the post in a since-deleted tweet, demanding his voice be removed from what he called “this disgusting and juvenile war porn.”

    That same month, The Pokémon Company International also issued a public rebuke of the White House for unauthorized use of its intellectual property, after the administration included a small graphic of the popular character Pikachu in a pro-Trump meme featuring the slogan “Make America Great Again.”

  • Family of slain teen call for death penalty in D4vd trial

    Family of slain teen call for death penalty in D4vd trial

    A high-profile criminal case centered on rising singer David Anthony Burke, professionally known as D4vd, has taken new turns as the family of his alleged 14-year-old victim pushes for the ultimate punishment and moves forward with a parallel civil lawsuit.

    The case first emerged in September 2025, when the dismembered remains of Celeste Rivas Hernandez were discovered inside the trunk of a Tesla vehicle registered to an address linked to Burke. The 14-year-old’s killing has shaken Southern California and drawn nationwide media attention, as the defendant built a growing career in the music industry before his arrest.

    Hernandez’s family has made clear their stance in recent public statements: if a jury finds Burke guilty of murder, they are calling for him to receive the death penalty. California has held a temporary moratorium on executions for years, but that has not dimmed the family’s demand for the harshest possible sentence. In a statement released Monday, September 2026, which would have marked Hernandez’s 16th birthday, the family described Burke as a remorseless person who inflicted unfathomable pain on their family and their daughter. “If the death penalty were activated, it would be perfect for this kind of human being, devoid of feelings and emptiness inside, and without conscience, who only caused pain to our daughter, our family, and the world that supports our precious daughter,” the statement read, released via the family’s legal team.

    Alongside their call for capital punishment in the criminal case, Hernandez’s parents, Mercedes Martinez and Jesus Rivas, have filed a civil wrongful death lawsuit against Burke in Los Angeles Superior Court. The court filing mirrors many of the claims laid out by prosecutors in the ongoing criminal matter, adding additional allegations against the singer’s professional and personal circle.

    The suit lays out a timeline of the pair’s relationship, alleging the two first connected in November 2023, when Hernandez was just 13 years old. Over the following 16 months, the parents claim, the pair exchanged nearly 10,000 text messages and engaged in repeated sexual encounters. The court documents argue that Burke, a full-grown adult at the time, held inappropriate power and influence over the minor victim, isolating her from outside support. According to the allegations, Burke killed Hernandez at his Hollywood Hills residence after she threatened to expose their secret relationship, sending him a message that read, “I will end ur career and ur life.” The suit brings claims of wrongful death, false imprisonment, and childhood sexual assault, and seeks financial compensation to cover the victim’s burial and funeral costs, among other damages.

    Notably, the civil suit does not name only Burke as a defendant. It also names several of the singer’s business entities, his managers, his mother, and his live-in security guard, alleging that these individuals enabled Burke’s actions, helped isolate Hernandez, and facilitated the conditions that allowed the abuse and killing to occur. Representatives for Burke’s management firm Mogul Vision and his finance manager have previously stated they had no knowledge of the relationship between Burke and Hernandez, according to reporting from the Los Angeles Times.

    The criminal case against Burke has already cleared a major procedural hurdle. Back in July 2026, a judge ruled that there was sufficient probable cause for the case to move forward to a criminal trial on the murder charge. At that time, district attorney officials confirmed they were still weighing whether to formally pursue a death sentence in the case.

    In recent weeks, Burke has made changes to his legal team. He has split from his high-profile celebrity defense attorney and is now represented by a public defender, with the case scheduled for a next court hearing on October 19, 2026. The full criminal trial has been pushed back to 2027. Burke has entered a formal plea of not guilty to all criminal charges against him.

    Deputy public defender Walid Kandeel, Burke’s current legal representative, noted that Burke has the right to a vigorous defense that carefully examines all evidence and takes his specific circumstances into account. “We are committed to providing him with that defence,” Kandeel said. His office has not yet issued any formal comment in response to the newly filed civil lawsuit.

  • Sinkhole appears outside Malibu home thought to belong to Nicolas Cage

    Sinkhole appears outside Malibu home thought to belong to Nicolas Cage

    A sudden geological collapse has disrupted a prime stretch of Malibu coastline, after a sinkhole opened up and swallowed most of the driveway leading to a beachfront home widely reported to belong to Hollywood star Nicolas Cage. Local law enforcement and public works officials confirmed the incident unfolded early Tuesday morning, when the pavement under the residential access road gave way without warning, leaving a large, gaping cavity in its place. No injuries have been reported in connection with the collapse, as the sinkhole formed far enough from the main residential structure to avoid immediate damage to the home itself. Coastal geologists note that Malibu’s eroding cliffside and beachfront terrain has long been at heightened risk of sudden ground collapse, particularly as shifting sand and soil under developed properties are weakened by tidal erosion and seasonal weather shifts. Local authorities have cordoned off the area around the sinkhole to prevent trespassing and assess the full extent of the ground instability, with geotechnical teams expected to conduct a full site survey this week to determine next steps for repairs and mitigation. As of Wednesday, representatives for Cage have not yet issued a public comment confirming ownership of the property or addressing the impact of the sinkhole collapse.

  • Nicolas Cage’s driveway collapses as sinkhole opens up at his Malibu home

    Nicolas Cage’s driveway collapses as sinkhole opens up at his Malibu home

    A massive 30-foot by 30-foot sinkhole has swallowed the driveway of a Malibu property owned by Academy Award-winning actor Nicolas Cage, marking one of the most visible aftermaths of Tropical Storm Marie’s destructive pass along Southern California’s coastline.

    Local eyewitness accounts reveal that the ground began showing signs of instability as early as Monday, when an 8-foot depression was first spotted on the property. Nearby residents told local media that at the initial stage, the property’s owners did not view the issue as overly serious, anticipating a quick, straightforward repair. But that mild concern quickly escalated into a full-scale emergency when the ground gave way entirely in the early hours of Tuesday, expanding the small depression into a gaping 30-foot crater that engulfed most of the paved driveway.

    The collapse triggered an emergency response after a gas line was damaged in the shift. First responders arrived quickly to contain the incident, and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) later confirmed that the leak had been fully secured. No injuries have been reported from the incident, according to initial official reports.

    The sinkhole, which sits on a coastal stretch of Malibu, has already been impacted by ongoing coastal erosion: AFP reporters on the scene noted that ocean waves now lap directly into the crater, flowing in and out beneath the support stanchions that hold up the hillside home. Traffic control cones have been placed around the unstable site to keep bystanders away.

    The damage comes on the heels of days of heavy rain and powerful high surf driven by Tropical Storm Marie, which weakened from hurricane status as it moved along the Southern California coast. Though the storm remained well offshore, it still dumped significant rainfall and sent damaging waves pounding against erodible coastal bluffs in Malibu. Local city officials have since declared at least five homes on the same street unsafe for occupancy, warning that the widespread ground collapse has severely restricted emergency access and left large sections of the roadway impassable.

    The property, purchased by Cage in 2024 shortly after the original sale was finalized, per reporting from the *New York Times*, is one of the actor’s Southern California residences. Cage, a 1996 Academy Award winner for his leading role in *Leaving Las Vegas*, is renowned for his decades-long career spanning iconic films including *Face/Off*, *Gone in 60 Seconds*, *Con Air*, and more recent critically acclaimed projects like *Pig* and *The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent*. The BBC has reached out to Cage’s representatives for additional comment on the incident, and no statement has been released as of yet.

  • Super Bowl rematch to open new season – your guide to NFL’s key games

    Super Bowl rematch to open new season – your guide to NFL’s key games

    The 2026 National Football League season is set to kick off this week, and defending Super Bowl champion Seattle Seahawks are showing no signs of being weighed down by the pressure that comes with wearing the crown.

    In February, the Seahawks dominated the New England Patriots to claim their second Super Bowl title in franchise history, marking a historic milestone for the team and one of their leading coaching staff members. British-born defensive coordinator Aden Durde, who retained his position with the Seahawks entering the new season, made history as the first non-American coach to lift the sport’s biggest prize. Reflecting on that groundbreaking win, Durde shared his thoughts with BBC Sport in an exclusive interview.

    “ That experience was honestly unreal, it’s hard to put into words how it felt,” Durde said. “For me, that run to the Super Bowl really reminded me why I love this job and why I put in the work every single day. What drives me is the constant process of improving, getting better one day at a time. Now we get to do this all again, and that’s what’s so exciting about this season.”

    The Seahawks will get their title defense underway with a highly anticipated rematch of last season’s Super Bowl against the Patriots, with kickoff scheduled for 01:20 BST on Thursday, which is Wednesday local time in the United States. While the Patriots will be the first test for Seattle, the early favorite to claim Super Bowl 61 is the Seahawks’ divisional rival Los Angeles Rams, who have dramatically upgraded an already star-studded roster this off-season. The two teams split two nail-biting regular season matchups last year before Seattle pulled out a dramatic playoff win over the Rams in a game that will go down as an instant classic. When asked about what the storied rivalry will look like this season, Durde remained focused on his own team’s preparation.

    “ No one can predict what this rivalry will look like this year,” Durde added. “That’s what the entire off-season is for: we’ve put in all the work to sharpen our skills, get physically and mentally ready for battle, and now it’s time to go.”

    This season’s schedule brings with it several unprecedented changes, driven by a unique calendar quirk. Since 2004, the defending champion has hosted the NFL’s opening game of the season. Normally, the opening game is held on a Thursday, but the 2026 campaign kicks off one week later than the traditional timeline, which puts it in conflict with long-standing U.S. laws that ban professional football broadcasts on Fridays and Saturdays starting in the second week of September. This scheduling conflict has forced the league to move the Seahawks’ opening game to Wednesday, marking the first time the season opener has been held on a Wednesday since 2012. The Rams’ international game against the San Francisco 49ers, set to be held at the iconic Melbourne Cricket Ground in Australia in front of a sellout crowd of 100,000 fans, will kick off at 10:35 a.m. local time on Friday, which translates to 01:35 BST on Friday, or Thursday evening U.S. time. This will be the first season opener to feature a Super Bowl rematch since 2016.

    Beyond the opening week, the 2026 schedule is packed with historic firsts and key can’t-miss matchups. Next Thursday will see the Buffalo Bills play their first game at their brand new stadium, Highmark Stadium, when they host the Detroit Lions. On October 25, one of the most anticipated matchups of the regular season will take place: last season’s Super Bowl Most Valuable Player Kenneth Walker will make a quick return to Seattle just months after leaving the team to sign with the Kansas City Chiefs. Walker made history last February as the first running back to claim Super Bowl MVP since 1998, and he is the first Super Bowl MVP to move to a new team immediately after winning the award since 2003.

    The 2026 season also brings expanded football action during the U.S. holiday season, a period that has become synonymous with the sport. This year, the NFL will host its first ever game on Thanksgiving Eve, with the Rams – who will appear in a league-leading seven primetime games this season – hosting the Green Bay Packers on November 25. That will be followed by a traditional triple-header of games on Thanksgiving Day, November 26. The holiday slate opens with two divisional rivalry games: the Detroit Lions host the Chicago Bears at 18:00 GMT, followed by the Dallas Cowboys welcoming the Philadelphia Eagles at 21:25 GMT. If star Kansas City quarterback Patrick Mahomes recovers fully from his off-season injury, fans will get to see his legendary rivalry with Buffalo’s Josh Allen renewed when the Chiefs visit the Bills at 01:20 GMT on Friday. For the fourth consecutive year, the Thanksgiving schedule will conclude with a Black Friday matchup on November 27, when the Pittsburgh Steelers host the Denver Broncos.

    Streaming platforms will also carry a growing number of games this season. 17 regular season games will be streamed exclusively on Amazon Prime, including a Christmas Eve matchup between the Houston Texans and Philadelphia Eagles, and a New Year’s Eve clash between the Baltimore Ravens and Cincinnati Bengals. Netflix will stream five games this season, including two of the three Christmas Day matchups: the Chicago Bears host the Green Bay Packers at 18:00 GMT, followed by the Denver Broncos hosting the Buffalo Bills at 21:30 GMT. The Christmas Day triple-header will wrap up with a rematch of last season’s dramatic NFC Championship game, when the Seahawks host the Rams at 01:15 GMT on December 26.

    The NFL continues its aggressive global expansion this season, with a record nine international regular season games on the schedule, up from seven last year. For the first time in league history, Australia and France will host regular season games. In total, regular season games will be held across four continents and seven countries: the NFL will return to Mexico after a four-year hiatus, while Brazil, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom will all retain their spots on the international schedule.

    The 17-week regular season will conclude on Sunday, January 10, 2027, with the playoffs set to get underway six days later on January 16. The season will culminate with Super Bowl 61, scheduled for Sunday, February 14, 2027 – marking the first time the NFL’s championship game has ever been held on Valentine’s Day. Coincidentally, the following day is Presidents’ Day, a federal public holiday in the United States, giving fans an extra day to recover from the big game. Super Bowl 61 will be held at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, the most expensive stadium ever built at $5.5 billion. Opened in 2020, SoFi Stadium is shared by the Rams and the Los Angeles Chargers, and this will be the ninth Super Bowl held in the greater Los Angeles area. The Rams previously won a Super Bowl on their home field in 2022, after the team built a star-studded roster ahead of that season and the gamble paid off with a 23-20 win over the Cincinnati Bengals in front of 70,048 fans. The Rams are looking to replicate that magic this season, trading for elite defensive stars Myles Garrett and Trent McDuffie during the off-season, and convincing 35-year-old three-time Defensive Player of the Year Aaron Donald to come out of retirement on a one-year deal to chase another title.

  • ‘Stolen valor’: Trump’s 9/11 story draws scorn as fabrication

    ‘Stolen valor’: Trump’s 9/11 story draws scorn as fabrication

    As the United States prepares for annual September 11 remembrance events, two overlapping political controversies have erupted, centered on conflicting reactions to two figures’ involvement in this week’s memorial activities. While Republican leaders have rushed to condemn New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s planned attendance at 9/11 commemorations solely on the basis of his Muslim faith, former U.S. President Donald Trump has ignited widespread public fury after repeating a deeply dubious, seemingly invented account of personal heroism during the 2001 terrorist attack aftermath.

    Trump shared the elaborate tale during an appearance Tuesday before an audience that included more than 100 first responders. He claimed that shortly after the attack, he traveled to Ground Zero and brought a crew of his own construction workers to assist in recovery efforts. According to Trump’s account, he found himself in danger when the U.S. Steel Building (now renamed One Liberty Plaza), which was widely feared at the time could collapse, began to creak heavily. He recalled that two large firefighters, convinced the structure was about to fall, grabbed him under the arms, lifted him off the ground, and carried him to safety, despite his protest that he could run on his own. “This is not easy to do. I’m big,” Trump added of the anecdote.

    This is not the first time Trump has shared variations of this story; he first told a version of the claim during his 2016 presidential campaign, and has repeatedly asserted he was on site at Ground Zero in the immediate hours after the attack. But nearly every detail of the new account contradicts public records and testimony from first responders who actually led recovery operations at Ground Zero.

    Trump’s own words from the day of the attack undermine his current claims. On September 11, 2001, he told WWOR-TV he was watching the attack unfold from his Trump Tower office, located four miles from the World Trade Center, and infamously and incorrectly boasted that he now owned the tallest building in lower Manhattan after the twin towers collapsed. While documentation confirms he was a few blocks from Ground Zero on September 13, 2001, his long-running claims that he deployed 100 construction workers to the site and personally assisted in recovery efforts have been repeatedly debunked.

    In 2019, Richard Alles, a New York City Fire Department battalion chief who arrived on scene just 20 minutes after the second tower collapsed and spent months working on recovery, told fact-checking outlet PolitiFact he had never heard of any Trump construction crew assisting at Ground Zero. “I was there for several months—I have no knowledge of his being down there,” Alles said. He added that all recovery work was directly overseen by police, fire, and emergency command, and a crew of 100 workers would have left a clear paper and on-site record. No record of such a deployment has ever emerged.

    Neither of the two firefighters who supposedly carried Trump to safety has ever publicly confirmed the incident, which Trump also never mentioned in any interviews in the weeks and years immediately after the attack. Outlets including The Associated Press and The Washington Post have repeatedly requested evidence to back up Trump’s 9/11 claims, and have never received a response.

    This fabricated anecdote is far from Trump’s first false claim related to the 9/11 attacks. He has previously falsely claimed he saw thousands of Muslim residents in Jersey City cheering as the towers fell, and that he personally predicted the attack in one of his books. He also misled the public about his charitable giving to 9/11 victims: he publicly pledged $10,000 to a 2001 recovery fund that the New York City comptroller later confirmed was never donated, and only gave $100,000 to the 9/11 Memorial and Museum more than 15 years after the attack. A 2016 New York Daily News investigation also found that Trump’s business empire received $150,000 in post-9/11 disaster relief meant for affected businesses, claiming the funds for lost rent, cleanup, and repairs despite his later assertion the money was compensation for letting victims shelter in his 40 Wall Street property.

    Journalist Ron Filipkowski, who first highlighted the latest false anecdote, framed the story as a new instance of what he calls Trump’s “stolen valor,” noting he was stunned by the level of detail in the invented tale. “I know he’s lied about his non-role in 9/11 rescue and recovery before, but never this level of detail,” Filipkowski said. “Trump could have made the ceremony with 9/11 first responders today about the many heroes who died attempting to rescue people and others who risked their lives and long-term health. But instead, he created a fictitious event featuring himself, who did nothing, as the hero of 9/11.”

    Critics have also highlighted a glaring double standard at play among Republican leaders, who have expressed public outrage over Mamdani’s planned attendance at Friday’s memorial events. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is among the top Republicans criticizing Mamdani’s participation, solely because of the mayor’s Muslim faith. Observers have pointed out that the same figures who claim offense at Mamdani’s involvement have remained silent on Trump’s fabricated story.

    “The people mad about the Mayor of New York attending the 9/11 event must be ENRAGED that Trump just lied about being at ground zero on 9/11,” Tim Fullerton, a former digital strategist for the Obama administration, wrote on X. “This is all about honoring the victims and not just to score points. Right???”

    The controversy comes as Mamdani this week released roughly 170,000 pages of public records showing that Giuliani’s mayoral administration deliberately misled New Yorkers about the severity of toxic air quality near Ground Zero in the aftermath of the attack, a decision that exposed thousands of first responders and recovery workers to dangerous long-term health risks.